Perspective Nr. 2 - 2011

download Perspective Nr. 2 - 2011

of 31

Transcript of Perspective Nr. 2 - 2011

  • 8/3/2019 Perspective Nr. 2 - 2011

    1/31

    humanitarian and interational affairs magazine #2/2011

    special report

    Quest for Paradise the American dream yet again.

    op-ed

    Rajendra Pachauri head of the UNs climate change panel onthe humanitarian costs of climate change.

    In 2010, more people were displacedby climate-related disasters than by

    wars and armed conficts .

    profile

    Kristalina Georgieva a popular commissioner

    Time To Run

  • 8/3/2019 Perspective Nr. 2 - 2011

    2/31

    PersPectiveNO. 02.2011

    Content 0211PERSPEcTIVE a humaNITaRIaN aNd INTERNaTIONal affaIRS magazINE

    06OP-ED

    Rajendra K. Pauchauri, Chair-

    man o the UNs Intergovern-

    mental Panel on Climate

    Change sums up the panels

    conclusions with regard to how

    humanitarian issues may be in-

    fuenced by climate change.

    30PrOfilE:Kristalina GEOrGiEva

    Kristalina Georgieva was ap-

    pointed an EU commissioner

    almost by accident, but she

    has won acclaim in her posi-

    tion as head of the European

    Unions department for hu-

    manitarian aid and crisis re-

    sponse.

    50HOmE-GrOwn DEmOcracy

    Somaliland unilateraly de-

    clared itsself independent 20

    years ago. No country has, ho-

    wever, recognised Somaliland

    as a sovereign state.

    46BlacK marKEt fOr

    Human OrGans

    In recent years, a large black

    marked for human organs has

    arisen. Throughout the world,poor people are willing to

    have their organs removed in

    return for money.

    34tHE QuEst fOr ParaDisE

    For many Mexicans the US re-

    presents their only hope of a

    better future, and every day

    thousands of Mexicans at-

    tempt to enter the US illegally.

    10DisPlacED By tHE wEatHErIn 2010, 42 million people were displaced by natural disasters. This number is

    set to increase with climate change.Konica Minolta Business Solutions Norway AS Nydalsveien 26 0484 Oslo www.konicaminolta.no

    Konica Minolta products present concepts and features

    which make it easy to consider the environment.

    Eco-friendly innovations can be found throughout the entire

    lifecycle of every device, including strict production standards,

    efficient operation and intelligent recycling. Furthermore, the

    manufacture of consumables, the transport of products and

    our procurement policy are part of the Konica Minolta mission

    to save resources and create new value.

    Theres only one world. We know it takes a great deal of

    effort to keep it a friendly pl ace.

    It takes the right ideasto shelter our planet.

  • 8/3/2019 Perspective Nr. 2 - 2011

    3/31

    4PersPectiveNO. 02.2011

    PersPective is on sale in the ollowingcountries: Australia, Austria, Belgium,Canada, Cyprus, France, Italy, Japan,Luxembourg, the Netherlands, NewZealand, Portugal, Spain, the UK, andthe USA.

    editor in chief Erik Giercksky

    editorHarriet Rudd

    Production manager Erik Tresse

    Writers and contributors

    Ola G. Alteren, Christopher Eads,Gunhild Forselv, Grete Gaulin, LindaJeanette Gresslien, Kaja Haldorsen,Roald Hvring, Ragnhild M.W. Jordheim,Vikram Kolmannskog, RajendraPachauri, ystein Mikalsen, Otto vonMnchow, Elisabeth Rasmusson, Andr

    Savik, Astrid Sehl, Erik R. Selmer, LisettaTrebbi, Birgit Vartdal, Rol Vestvik, TonjeM.Viken, Adam Zyglis and Tor vreb

    circulation services

    Naweed [email protected]

    sales

    Pineapple Media Limited,172 Northern Parade, Hilsea,Portsmouth, Hampshire PO2 9LT, UK

    design Tet Design

    PrintingGamlebyen Graske

    circulation15,000

    cover Photo Scanpix

    Publisher

    The Norwegian Reugee Council

    Questions regarding the nrc should

    be directed to:

    [email protected]

    The views expressed in Perspectivedo not necessarily refect the viewso the NRC

    norWegian refugee council

    Box 6758 St. Olavs Plass0130 OsloNorway

    The Norwegian Refugee Council(NRC) is an independent, humanitariannon-governmental organisation whichprovides assistance, protection anddurable solutions to refugees and in-ternally displaced persons worldwide.

    over the last years humanitarian or-

    ganisations all around the world have

    witnessed how the changing climate

    s increasing the burden o their work. The

    Norwegian Reugee Council predominantly

    works or reugees rom armed conict, but

    we are experiencing that climate change is

    adversely aecting the people we try to help.

    A dramatic example is the 2010 Pakistan

    oods, which displaced 11 million people,

    among them 30,000 Aghans living in a re-

    ugee camp in one o the regions most seri-

    ously devastated by the oods. Their camp

    was swept away by t he oodwater. Without

    relatives in the immediate area there was

    ittle they could do to help themselves and

    being aliens - they were the last to receive

    government aid. As a result this group b eca-

    me extremely vulnerable.

    It is highly probable that the number o

    natural disasters and, in consequence, the

    numbers o displaced people, will continue

    to rise as the planet becomes warmer, and

    weather conditions deteriorate as a result

    o the changing climate. Ofering assistance,

    support and protection to such groups o

    displaced people will, thereore, constitute

    a large part o humanitarian work in the de-

    cades to come.

    PeoPle Without Protection

    In contrast to reugees rom war, those dis-

    placed by climate change are oered little or

    no protection in international conventions

    or by international law. We know ull well

    that such specifc guarantees are not alwaysenough to provide actual protection but,

    nothing else, they oer a legal, moral, and

    normative ramework or demanding, or ar-

    guing or, necessary protection.

    The NRC is thereore concerned about the

    uture. We eel that this so-called protecti-

    on gap should be given ar more attention

    than is currently the case. That is why we

    have decided to dedicate a large section o

    this issue o Perspective to the humanitari-

    an aspects o climate change.

    resPonsibility

    The UN High Commissioner or Reugees is

    very clear that something has to be done to

    improve protection or those displaced by

    climate change. He does not, however, rec-

    ommend re-negotiating the Reugee Conven-

    tion in order to include this group. He is wor-

    ried that the end result would not be more

    protection or those in need but, conversely,

    reduced protection or reugees rom war.

    This is, perhaps, hardly surprising in light o

    the recent hostile reaction in some parts o

    Europe to the inux o people seeking secu-

    rity in the wake o the Arab uprisings.

    According to the Old Testament, God,

    addressing Cain, asked, Where is your bro-

    ther, Abel? and Cain replied, How should

    I know? Am I my brothers keeper? Cain had

    killed his brother, and buried him, so, Cain,

    hoping to divert Gods attention, attempted

    to do so by rejecting the idea that he could

    be expected to watch over Abel.

    Western prosperity could not have been

    achieved without extensive green-house gas

    emissions: now the Developing World is su-

    ering rom those negative consequences o

    Western economic expansion. We cannot

    ignore the misery that we have been instru-

    mental in causing by reusing to ace up to

    our obligations to provide help or those in

    need. n

    nn In contrast to refugees from war,those displaced by climate change are of-fered little or no protection in internationalconventions or by international law.

    editorial

    Am I My BrothersKeeper

    F

    Take an international mastersdegree in International Studieor Peace and Conflict Studies

    One semester in Norway, courses developed and taught by PRIO

    (Peace Research Institute Oslo). Remaining semesters taught at Stellenbo

    University, South Africa or The Australian National University, Canberra.

    For more information:

    www.prio.no/education

    [email protected]

  • 8/3/2019 Perspective Nr. 2 - 2011

    4/31

    6PersPectiveNO. 02.2011

    PersPectiveNO. 02.2011

    The major ndings rom the report show that i

    global temperatures increase as projected, this

    will trigger a range o humanitarian challenges

    and adverse impacts on water, ecosystems, ood pro-

    duction, coastal areas, and human health.

    Since 1975 the incidence o extreme high sea level

    and the requency o heavy precipitation events have

    increased. Available research points towards a signi-

    cant uture increase in heavy rainall events in many

    regions, including some in which the mean rainall is

    projected to decrease. The resulting increased ood

    risk poses challenges to society, physical inrastruc-

    ture and water quality. It is likely that up to 20 percent

    o the world population will live in areas where river

    ood potential could increase by the 2080s. Increases

    in the requency and severity o oods and droughts

    are projected to adversely afect sustainable develop-

    ment. In coastal areas sea level rise will exacerbate wa-

    ter resource constraints due to increased salinisation

    o groundwater supplies. Overall, hundreds o millions

    o people would be exposed to increased water stress.

    FOOD PRODUCTION

    Climate change and variability would have serious

    implications or global ood security and millions o

    armers dependent on rained agriculture. Food pro-

    duction and the livelihoods o armers could ace se-

    rious issues as a result o complex, localized negative

    impacts on smallholders, subsistence armers and

    shing communities. There would be tendencies or

    cereal productivity to decrease in low latitudes and to

    increase at mid to high latitudes at a 1C global mean

    annual temperature change relative to the end o the

    last century. However, in low latitudes at temperature

    increases o above 3.5 C productivity o all cereals is

    projected to decrease.

    HUMAN HEALTH

    Climate change would have signicant impacts on

    human health as well. There would be an increasing

    burden on communities rom malnutrition, diarrheal,

    cardio-respiratory and inectious diseases. There

    would also be increased morbidity and mortality rom

    heat waves, oods and droughts. At temperature in-

    creases o even up to 2 degrees C elsius it is projected

    that a changed distribution o some disease vectors

    might occur.

    Small Island states and low lying coastal areas

    are particularly vulnerable to the impacts o cli-

    mate change. Projected sea level rise could ood the

    homes o millions o people living in the low lying ar-

    eas o South, Southeast and East Asia. It will exacer-

    bate coastal inundation, storm surges, erosion, and

    other coastal hazards, thus threatening vital inra-

    structure, settlements and acilities that support the

    livelihood o island communities.

    MIGRATION

    The Second Assessment report (SAR) o the IPCC dis-

    cussed population movement in response to envi-

    ronmental impacts and the attraction o large urban

    areas. Human populations show signifcant tenden-

    cies to adapt to inter- annual variability o climate via

    migration, although migration may be the last o a

    complex set o coping strategies. In some cases, im-

    migration is more permanent and does not involve

    large areas. For example, ater three successive ty-

    phoons hit Tau Island in American Samoa in 1987,

    1990 and 1991, about one third o the population

    abandoned their homes and moved to Pago Pago on

    Tutuila Island, putting more population pressure on

    the limited economic opportunities and services o

    that island.

    ETHICS AND EQUITY

    The AR4 concludes that neither adaptation nor mitiga-

    tion alone can avoid all climate change impacts; how-

    ever, they can complement each other and together

    signicantly reduce the risks o climate change. Miti-

    gation eforts and investments over the next 2 to 3

    decades will have a large impact on opportunities to

    achieve lower stabilization levels. A wide array o ad-

    aptation options is available, but more extensive adap-

    tation than is currently occurring is required to reducevulnerability to climate change.

    Adaptive capacity is intimately connected to social

    and economic development, but it is not evenly dis-

    tributed across and within societies. Unortunately,

    several communities and locations most vulnerable

    to the impacts o climate change are the ones which

    would nd their capacity to adapt most inadequate

    to deal with projected changes. This raises several is-

    sues o ethics and equity, which would be explored in

    detail in the Fith Assessment Report o the IPC C.n

    OP-ED

    The Humanitarian Impact Of Climate Change

    RAjENDRA K PACHAURI

    is Chairman o the In-ergovernmental Panel

    on Climate Change(IPCC), a scientifc

    body established bythe United Nations

    Environment Programand the World Meteor-ological Organization.

    The Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) of the Intergovernmental Panel on ClimateChange (IPCC) has, in much greater depth than was possible in previous assessments,dealt with humanitarian issues related to climate change.

    nnIt is likely that

    up to 20 percent o the world

    population willlive in areas

    where river-foodpotential couldincrease by the

    2080s.

    ILLUSTRATION bY ADAM ZYGLIS: Zyglis is the sta cartoonist or The Bualo News. His cartoons are internationally syndicated and have appeared in mpublications around the world, including The Washington Post, USA Today, The New York Times and Los Angeles Times.

  • 8/3/2019 Perspective Nr. 2 - 2011

    5/31

    8 PersPectiveNO. 02.2011 PersPectiveNO. 02.2011

    uganda

    CraCk-downSince mid-April, politicians and activ-

    ists have staged a series of walk-to-

    work marches in order to demon-

    strate against rising fuel and food

    prices. Police have used violent

    measures to try to stop the protests.

    Several people have been killed, and

    opposition leaders have been arrest-

    ed. On 10 May police sprayed dem-

    onstrators with a pink liquid in an at-

    tempt to stop a mass-rally.

    On 12 May, in the midst o the pro-

    tests, Ugandan President, Museveni,

    was inaugurated as President or his

    ourth presidential term. Museveni

    has ruled Uganda since 1986, and

    was re-elected President in February

    2011 by a clear margin.

    Several opposition leaders have

    taken active parts in the protests, in-

    cluding the main opposition leader,

    Dr. Besigye. Besigye claims the Feb-

    ruary elections were rigged. The

    President, on the other hand, has ac-

    cused Besigye o exploiting the situ-

    ation and trying to start Egyptian-

    style protests in Uganda.

    Museveni was or years credit-

    ed with introducing democratic re-

    orm and improving human rights in

    Uganda but, o late, has been criti-

    cised or resorting to anti-democratic

    methods.

    Syria

    rising death toll

    There are continual reports of

    security forces killing protest-

    ers in Syria. By the end of May,

    almost 1,000 people had been

    killed in the ongoing unrest.

    Since 15 March, protesters

    have been taking to the streets

    demanding democratic re-

    form and an end to the Baath

    partys monopoly of power.

    In April, Syrian President,

    Bashar al-Assad, lifted the

    emergency law that has been

    in force since 1963, but he hasdone little else to introduce

    democratic reform. Interna-

    tional pressure is mounting on

    al-Assad, either to initiate re-

    forms or resign. In late April,

    the US imposed targeted sanc-

    tions against members of the

    regime. Both the US and the

    most important regional pow-

    er, Turkey, have warned Assad

    that his time is running out.

    yemen

    deteriorating seCurityThe protests in Yemen have been in processsince January. The regime has cracked down on

    protesters, killing some 180 people. The Gul

    States have brokered several deals in which

    President Ali Abdullah Saleh has agreed to step

    down, but the President has always withdrawn

    rom the agreement at the last moment.

    The security situation outside o the capi-

    tal has also deteriorated and - according to the

    International Crisis Group - an armed group

    linked to Al Qaida has assumed control over an

    area in the south.

    Libya

    stalemateAter months o fghting, the battle

    or power seems to have reached a

    stalemate. A number o Gaddafs

    ner circle have deected, and sever

    members o his amily have been

    killed. Despite these losses, and tw

    months o NATO bombing, opposi-

    tion troops appear unable to achie

    a military breakthrough.

    At the end o May the Internation

    Criminal Courts (ICC) Chie Prosec

    tor requested the issue o a warran

    or the arrest o Colonel Gaddaf.

    Gaddaf is accused o personally ha

    ing ordered attacks on unarmed ci

    vilians. There is hope that a warran

    will urther isolate Gaddaf. Howev

    er, questions have been voiced as t

    why only Gaddaf is being targeted

    while the leaders o Syria and Yem

    go ree. Such a warrant must be ap

    proved by three judges o the court

    beore coming into orce.

    u: crack down on walk-to-work marches

    s: security orces shoot demonstrators

    lb: Gaddaf accused o war crimes

    y: unresolved

    h sp1

    3

    2

    4

    99,1724,881 7,727 9,6025,069 8,645

    un TrOOPS Were engaged in

    PeaCe-KeePing miSSiOnS in 2010.

    Th num of UN toop nd y 2,4 pnt ompd wth 2009.

    SOurCe: GlObal Peace OPeraTiONs, UN (Unm)

    2,4%increasein

    thenumber ofun troopsde-ployed in 2010.

    NIGERIA

    INDIA

    EGYPT

    BANGLADESHPAKISTAN

    top five contributors to un peace-keeping forces:

    1

    3

    2

    4

    PhOTO:scanpix

  • 8/3/2019 Perspective Nr. 2 - 2011

    6/31

    10PersPectiveNO. 02.2011

    PersPectiveNO. 02.2011

    Climate Change and displaCement

    42 million people weredisplaced by naturaldisasters last year. 90 percent o them were victimso so-called climate-relateddisasters.

    The numbers o displaced by natural disas-

    ters now exceeds, by ar, the numbers dis-

    placed by war, armed conict and political

    persecution. In 2010, the estimated number

    o reugees stood at 43 million, but only a

    raction o these were newly displaced, many

    are victims o protracted crises and have

    been reugees or years, or even decades.

    Natural-disaster displacement varies great-

    y rom one year to the next but, overall, the

    number seems to be increasing. This is per-

    haps not surprising as, over the last 20 years,

    the number o natural disasters has doubled,

    rom approximately 200 to more than 400

    per year. All over the world climate change is

    orcing people to ee their homes.

    The poor are worst aected, but people liv-

    ng in the developed world are suering the

    consequences as well. In 2005, Hurricane

    Katrina ooded 80 per cent o New Orleans,

    displacing 800,000 people. In April and May

    2011, violent storms struck the US, attening

    houses and killing several hundred people.

    With all probability the numbers o those

    killed, injured and displaced by extreme

    weather will only continue to increase as hu-

    man-induced climate change comes into ull

    orce. It is to be expected, that in the uture,

    more and more people may - or longer or

    shorter periods- be orced to ee their homes,

    to escape the violence and turmoil o the in-

    clement weather.

    These developments are causing great

    concern among humanitarian agencies.

    The high number o displaced are putting an

    enormous strain on resources, but perhaps

    a more undamental worry is while reugees

    rom war and persecution are protected by

    nternational conventions, it is highly un-

    clear what laws and policies protect those

    displaced by climate change.

    Time To Run

    DRoughT anDconflicT: thepastoralists inSouth Sudanvictims o botdrought and aconict.Experts disagwhether or no

    there is a cleacorrelation between warmeclimate and increased levelconict. Therno doubt, howthat within SoSudan, as in oparts o Aricmany local coicts are triggby disagreemover access tscarce watergrazing resou

    all PhoToS bRune eRakeREraker worksin classical Epean documetary photograbordering on photography.the past 20 yhe has travelltroubled regioin Asia, AricaLatin America

  • 8/3/2019 Perspective Nr. 2 - 2011

    7/31

    12PersPectiveNO. 02.2011

    PersPectiveNO. 02.2011

    Climate Change and displaCement

    The wilder weather is accelerating human-

    itarian problems, and agencies at the ront

    line o disaster response are worried.

    Through our work we see that climate

    change has eects here and now, says

    Lisetta Trebbi, Climate Adviser at theNorwegian Reugee Council.

    She gives examples rom countries

    where the NRC is active: droughts and

    oods in Kenya and Somalia triggering

    competition or resources, in addition to

    increasing the spread o cholera and diar-

    rhoea. Land erosion in Burundi. Cyclone

    Nargis, devastating homes in Myanmar.

    I could go on and on. People are having

    problems coping, and so are the humani-

    tarian agencies, she says.

    millionS DiSPlaceDThe projections or the number o peo-

    ple who will migrate or be displaced as a

    result o climate change vary greatly. For

    example, the last report rom the Inter-

    governmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC) quotes estimates that 150 million

    people may be displaced by 2050. In the

    Stern Review o the Economics o Climate

    Change, the estimated number is 200 mil-

    lion displaced persons by 2050.

    These numbers are subject to a high

    degree o uncertainty, primarily because

    there has been no baseline inormation on

    current levels o disaster-related displace-

    ment, explains Trebbi. To address this

    gap the Internal Displacement Monitoring

    Centre (IDMC) started monitoring dis

    ter-related displacement on a yearly b

    Last year alone, 42 million people we

    displaced by sudden-onset natural dis

    ters. 90 per cent o them were victims

    climate-related disasters, such as stor

    and oods.

    The numbers displaced by natural

    asters are oten high. Experts, howev

    er, agree that much o the sudden-on

    disaster displacement is temporary a

    victims seldom move more than a sh

    distance. The eectiveness and succe

    o response, recovery and rehabilitat

    eorts largely determine or how lon

    people are displaced. For example, i

    Philippines people may remain displ

    Escaping Wild

    WeatherIn 2010, Russia suered its hottest summer in more than a 100 years, bringingabout droughts and sparking o wildfres. Recently the US state o Alabama wasravaged by tornados.Worldwide, natural disasters are becoming the new norm,but nowhere is the reality harsher than in the developing world.by: Vikram Kolmannskog

    moRning in Dacca: Bangladesh is one o the countries that has been hardest hit by natural disasters and climate change. They are at risk rom both sudden-onset disasters, such as cyclones and oods, and slow-onset disasters, caused by rising sea-levels and melting ice in the Himalaya s.

  • 8/3/2019 Perspective Nr. 2 - 2011

    8/31

    14PersPectiveNO. 02.2011

    PersPectiveNO. 02.2011

    Climate Change and displaCementor months or years as a result o a disas-

    ter that would displace people or only a

    ew days, or weeks in Japan.

    It is oten a question o ability and

    will, explains Trebbi. How quickly can

    we respond to a disaster by evacuating

    people, and ullling their basic needs

    or such things as ood and shelter?

    How quickly can we rebuild houses and

    homes? And, importantly, o what qual-

    ty are the rebuilt houses? For example,

    n Myanmar, we are now trying to build

    houses that are more resistant to storms

    and extreme weather.

    many cauSeS of migRaTionThere is rarely a simple and direct corre-

    ation between natural disasters and hu-

    man mobility. This becomes particularly

    clear in slow-onset disasters such as rising

    sea-levels or drought. People have many

    reasons or moving. These are oten inex-

    tricably linked.

    Environmental migration is part o

    arger migration dynamics, explains Dr.

    Francois Gemenne at the Institute o Sus-

    tainable Development and International

    Relations at Sciences Po in Paris. While

    conducting research on the small island

    state o Tuvalu, he ound that people

    gave many reasons or leaving, including

    amily, school, work and uncertainties

    about the uture o the islands when the

    sea levels rise. Even the political agree-

    ment to limit the rise in global average

    temperature to 2 degrees Celsius, endan-

    gers the existence o some o these small

    island states.

    In slow-onset disasters the line be-

    tween migration and displacement be-

    comes particularly blurred. Dr. Gemenne

    and most other social scientists recog-

    nise that the degree o choice can be con-

    sidered along a continuum. At the early

    stages o sea-level rise or o drought,

    movement is requently considered as

    voluntary migration. It is one o several

    options. In many parts o the world, cy-

    clical and seasonal migration to obtain an

    additional income is normal during di-

    cult times. It is now increasingly recog-

    nised that migration can also be an adap-

    tation strategy, says Dr. Gemenne.

    While it is hard to determine when

    the movement becomes orced displace-

    ment, it nevertheless remains impor-

    tant, says Trebbi at the NRC. The rea-

    son is that migrants are considered to

    have dierent needs and are treated di-

    erently in law and policy rom [involun-

    tary] displaced people.

    An average o more than 75 mil-

    lion people were annually aected by

    droughts between 2000 and 2009, but

    the problems o ascribing causation and

    determining the element o orce, means

    that no global estimates or displacement

    are available. Another challenge is that

    even a relatively small number o dis-

    placed people, might be a proportionate-

    ly large part o the population o some o

    the island nations. With less than 12, 000

    inhabitants, migration and displacement

    rom Tuvalu could in itsel t hreaten the

    existence o the nation.

    noWheRe To goIn one way or another, all countries will

    be aected by climate change, but some

    will be more immediately and particu-

    larly aected. The IPCC highlights the

    Small Island Developing States, Arica,

    mega-deltas such as the Ganges-Brahma-

    putra delta in Bangladesh, and the Polar

    Regions.

    Migration and displacement means

    that eects in one country may inuence

    other countries and regions as well, says

    Trebbi. However, I am very critical o

    those drawing a picture o oods o reu-

    gees arriving in Western countries.

    Migration and displacement may be

    internal or cross-border, or temporary

    or permanent movements, but experts

    agree that it is likely that the majority

    o people will remain within their own

    country now and in the near uture. They

    also agree that it is important not to over-

    look those who do not move during dis-

    asters. While some remain because they

    are, at least to some degree, able to cope,

    others may in act be orced to stay. O-

    ten the most vulnerable people do not

    have the resources to move, explains Dr.

    Gemenne.

    Clearly, climate change has many e-

    ects on human movement. The nature

    and the extent o movements will be

    greatly determined by policy respons-

    es, not only by environmental chang-

    es, says Dr. Gemenne. These policy

    responses include mitigation policies

    to deal with the reduction o climate

    change; adaptation policies so people

    can cope with environmental changes,

    and o course migration and displace-

    ment policies.

    The WhoS Who of climaTe changenaTional goveRnmenTS perorm their mostimportant task at the negotiations arena.Ultimately, national governments bear the re-sponsibility or reaching agreements to allthese questions and to take political actionbeore the consequences o climate changebecome too catastrophic.National governments in highly aected areasalso play an important role defning nationalneeds or adaptation measures through theirNational adaptation programmes o action(NAPAs). National policies or reducing emis-sions, integration o climate change adapta-

    tion into development policies and initiativesor mitigation in aected areas, are other ar-eas o responsibility o the national g overn-ments.

    The uniTeD naTionS is the keeper o the ne-gotiation process. The Climate Change Secre-tariat, on one hand, drives the negotiations bymaking all the practical arrangement or thevarious meetings, preparing the ofcial docu-ments, and coordinating with the secretariato other relevant international bodies and con-ventions. On the other hand, the secretariatis monitoring the implementation o commit-

    ments under the Convention and the Protocol.The secretariat is situated in Bonn and em-ploys some 400 sta.

    The civil SocieTy, United Nation programmesand the international multilateral system play acrucial role trough thousands o organizationsand individuals, oering opinions, suggestions,and both political and scientifc/technical advice.These actors come together, or individually, tothe negotiation arena, where they are allowedaccess to the negotiators and where they canshare their views and expertise without having

    any ormal role at the negotiation table.Outside the negotiating arena, the climatechange issue has been promoted as the onedefning development issue o our time. Thishas led to all development actors scramblingto fnd ways where their contribution canmake a dierence on the ground. This agendais dominated by UN agencies, multilateralfnance institutions (notably the World Bankand regional development banks), large In-ternational Non- Governmental Organi-sations and local civil society organisations.Adaptation- and local mitigation programmesorm important parts o this work.

    ecuaDoR:

    A Two-yeaDisaster

    Most migration in Ecuado

    used to be been internal.

    Heads o households have

    ditionally ound short-term

    employment in the cities o

    other wealthy regions o th

    country in order to earn a

    ditional income. Since the

    1990s this has changed.

    The El Nio event o 199

    1998 was unusual in both

    strength and duration.

    The El Nio Southern Os

    cillation (ENSO) is a cyclica

    variation o the atmospher

    general circulation that lea

    to droughts or oods. It ha

    curred or millennia and th

    ect o the climate change i

    certain, but there are conc

    that extreme events associ

    with it might become more

    quent and more intense.

    Agriculture is an impor

    part o the Ecuadorian ec

    omy, and the 1997-1998 o

    damaged more than 100,0

    hectares o rst-class agri

    tural areas. Roads, telecom

    munication and water sup

    networks were also heavil

    damaged, or, in most case

    totally destroyed. Thousa

    lost their properties and j

    In addition, there was a w

    er economic crisis related

    to a collapse o internatio

    al oil prices. This combina

    tion weakened the Ecuad

    an economy, and there we

    ewer opportunities or teporary internal movemen

    Migration abroad increase

    dramatically with Spain a

    the EU as the main destin

    tions.

    main SouRce: Alvarez Gila, O.,Lpez de Maturana Diguez, VUgalde Zaratiegui, A., 2009. Edor. EACH-FOR.

    alaSka:

    Ice Melting Under their FeetIn Alaska, temperatures have increased by

    between 2 and 3,5 degrees Celsius over a

    period o 35 years, and sea ice is decreas-

    ing and permarost is thawing. These

    changes requently lead to erosion. As a

    result several indigenous communities

    have been orced to relocate. Environ-

    mental studies indicate that they might

    submerge them within the next 15 years.

    One o the communities that have been

    orced to relocate is Shishmare. Tony A.

    Weyiouanna, one o the inhabitants o the

    island says that since the time o his grand-

    ather the water level has increasingly

    risen, seasons have become shorter, sum-

    mers and winters warmer, with a result-

    ing thinning o the ice. The loss o land

    through erosive action with an increasing

    risk to property and lives has caused a dan-

    gerous situation, he explains.

    The only viable solution is to relocate

    the island community to a nearby main-

    land location that has access to the sea,

    thereby making possible the continued

    subsistence liestyle o the community,

    preserving the culture and integrity o the

    community.

    The 2006 Alaska Village Erosion Tech-

    nical Assistance Program established by

    the US Congress evaluated the dierent

    costs associated with erosion control as

    opposed to relocation. It also identied a

    number o governance issues that need to

    be addressed, including establishing a gov-

    ernment agency with authority to relocate

    communities, and designated unding and

    criteria or choosing relocation sites.

    The humanitarian crisis in Alaska clearly

    demonstrates the need to create clear relo-

    cation principles and guidelines based on

    human rights.

    main SouRce: Bronen, R., 2008. Alaskan com-munities rights and resilience. Forced MigrationReview 31, pp. 30-32.

    The loss of

    land through ero-sive action with anincreasing risk toproperty and liveshave caused a dan-gerous situation.

    Tony a. Weyiouanna,resident o Shishmare

    PeoPle of The aRcTic: indigenous way o lie in the Arctic is is seriously threatened by clim ate change.

  • 8/3/2019 Perspective Nr. 2 - 2011

    9/31

    16PersPectiveNO. 02.2011

    PersPectiveNO. 02.2011

    Climate Change and displaCement

    No Guaranteeo Protectionby: Vikram Kolmannskog

    The reugee denition o the 1951 Reu-

    gee Convention does not mention climate

    change or natural disasters. A reugee is

    someone outside o his or her country o

    nationality who is unable or unwilling to

    return because o a well-ounded ear o

    persecution on account o race, religion,

    nationality, membership in a particular

    social group, or political opinions.

    Some advocates have suggested amend-

    ng the Reugee Convention denition,

    but there are major actors opposed to

    this. The convention was drated ater the

    Second World War to deal with the reu-

    gee crises in Europe. Today, there is a di-

    erent situation and political climate or

    reugees. According to their 2009 policy

    paper, the United Nations High Commis-

    sioner or Reugees (UNHCR) considers

    that any initiative to modiy this deni-

    tion would risk a renegotiation o the 1951

    Reugee Convention, which [] could re-

    sult in a lowering o protection standards

    or reugees and even undermine the in-

    ternational reugee protection regime al-

    together.

    n neeD of PRoTecTionHowever, the agency is very clear thatsomething must be done. This is not an

    over the horizon' issue. There is a grow-

    ng consensus that the eects o climate

    change are already being elt, says Dr.

    Volker Trk, Director o International

    Protection at UNHCR. One o UNHCRs

    mandated responsibilities is to assist in

    the progressive development o inter-

    national law related to orced displace-

    ment. We eel that it is our responsibility

    to draw attention to this legal gap and to

    spur reection about how to ll it.

    National legislation, policies and insti-

    tutions are absolutely central. Regional

    cooperation rameworks should buttress

    action at national level. There is also a

    need to develop a global guiding rame-

    work or instrument, recommends Dr.

    Trk. To tackle the myriad o problems

    created by climate change, international

    solidarity and responsibility-sharing will

    be needed more than ever.

    In order to encourage high-level inter-

    national discussion on displacement and

    climate change, the UNHCR is both initi-

    ating and participating in several discus-

    sions on the topic, one o which will take

    place at the Nansen Conerence on Cli-

    mate Change and Displacement in Oslo

    in early June.

    The Nansen conerence is hosted by

    the Norwegian Minister o Development

    and Environment and the Minister o

    Foreign Aairs. The Foreign Minister,

    Jonas Gahr Stre, supports Dr. Trks ar-

    gument: There are weighty humanitar-

    ian reasons or establishing a protective

    ramework or external displacement

    resulting rom sudden-onset natural dis-

    asters, including where climate change

    plays a part. They are not reugees in the

    legal sense, but they are nonetheless in

    need o help.

    Some aRe RefugeeSSome commentators and scholars have

    been quick to conclude that those dis-

    placed in the context o climate change are

    not reugees according to the Convention.

    This is a too hasty conclusion, claims

    Lisetta Trebbi, Climate Adviser o the Nor-

    wegian Reugee Council. We believe that

    a dynamic and contextual interpretation

    o existing law shows that some people

    are, indeed, reugees. This is important

    because we dont know how much more

    we can hope to achieve in terms o protec-

    tion or this group o people.

    In their 2009 policy paper on climate

    change and natural disasters, the UN-

    HCR claries that some situations are

    covered by the Convention, including

    when the victims o natural disasters

    ee rom their homeland because theirGovernment has consciously withheld

    or obstructed assistance in order to pun-

    ish or marginalize them on one o the

    ve grounds set out in the reugee deni-

    tion. For example, it is not unusual or a

    member o a marginalised ethnic group,

    or a political dissident, to be denied cru-

    cial assistance during a disaster. I they

    ee the country as a consequence, they

    could possibly be considered as reugees.

    In addition, there are oten several rea-

    We could be moving toward a future where the majority of displacedpeople have been forced to leave their homes,without any right toreceive protection and support.

    RefugeeS: th

    Inuits, in Greeland, will perhnumber amonfrst people wwill have to recate as a resuclimate changIt is unclear wlegal rights otection and suport people dplaced by climchange can cunder internaal law.

    This is not an'over the horizon' is-

    sue. There is a grow-ing consensus thatthe eects o climatechange are alreadybeing elt.DR. volkeR TRk, Director o International Pro-tection at UNHCR

  • 8/3/2019 Perspective Nr. 2 - 2011

    10/31

    18PersPectiveNO. 02.2011

    PersPectiveNO. 02.2011

    Climate Change and displaCementsons why a person moves. In the case o

    Somalia, several reugees mention both

    persecution and drought as reasons or

    eaving. I drought and conict coincide,

    we will not split hairs, inorms a senior

    UNHCR sta member, responsible or the

    reugees in Kenya. Moreover, in the So-

    mali case, many countries recognise the

    displaced persons as prima acie reugees

    because o the severe humanitarian cri-

    sis in the country. UNHCR also claries

    that there are regional reugee conven-

    tions with broader denitions that may

    more easily include those eeing natural

    disasters. Clearly, the situation or those

    displaced is not as black or white as some

    portray it.

    SPecial STaTuSHowever, there is still agreement that

    many, i not most, o the cross-border dis-

    placed will not be considered reugees,

    and there have been calls to strengthen

    their protection.

    But why should we give special pro-

    tection to them as opposed to others in

    need, such as those eeing general pov-

    erty? It may be arbitrary to single out the

    environment as a driver o migration and

    displacement, rather than ocusing on the

    needs and rights o all those who are or-

    cibly displaced, admits Proessor Jane

    McAdam, o the University o New South

    Wales, Australia. However, I also ap-

    preciate that getting states to agree to ex-

    panded protection obligations towards a

    wider class o orced migrant, would con-

    stitute an enormous political challenge.

    Some experts highlight that we have

    a special responsibility towards those

    displaced because o the environmental

    disruptions that we have induced. Oth-

    ers go urther and argue that we should

    have special conventions or those dis-

    placed by the eects o climate change,

    separating them rom the wider group

    o environmentally displaced persons.

    Proessor McAdam and most other hu-manitarian experts disagree with this ap-

    proach insoar as it relates to rights or

    the migrant or displaced person. From

    the viewpoint o the migrant or displaced

    person, it doesnt make any dierence

    From the viewpoint o the migrant or displaced person, it doesnt make any diference whether the environmental disruption is climate - related or not.RofeSSoR Jane mcaDan

    ScenaRioS foR The fuTuRe: so far, poor and undeveloped countries are those that have suffered the most as a result rom natural disasters and climate change, but in the course o the past year natural di saster has also caused enormous damage and humansuering in the industrialised world. By the end o May 2011, the hurricanes had brought about at least 300 deaths in the US.

  • 8/3/2019 Perspective Nr. 2 - 2011

    11/31

    20PersPectiveNO. 02.2011

    PersPectiveNO. 02.2011

    Climate Change and displaCement

    Tuvalu:Sinking Island StateSinking Island States are oten used

    as an example o how difcult a per-

    sons legal position may become as a re-

    sult o climate change. These states are

    threatened by sea-level rises, and there

    is a danger that they may become in-

    habitable, leaving their citizens literally

    stateless. Whether it would in act also

    render them stateless in a legal sense is

    not clear.

    With an average elevation o one me-

    ter above sea level, the island nation

    o Tuvalu is extremely vulnerable to

    sea-level rise. There are also other en-

    vironmental problems relating to wa-

    ter shortage, waste disposal, and over-

    population. Frequent saltwater oodingand accelerated coastal erosion are con-

    sequences o a changing environment.

    Some people still believe, that with

    international support, it will be pos-

    sible or the country to survive. How-

    ever, more and more people are leav-

    ing or other countries out o ear that

    the islands will be ooded. I dont

    want to wake up one morning with the

    island washed away I preer to leave

    now, beore I have no other choice,

    says Nooaloa Petero. There are ap

    proximately 3,000 Tuvaluans in Ne

    Zealand. Uncertainties about the u

    rather than immediate environmen

    concerns, seem to be the main migr

    tion drivers. In most cases, environ

    tal actors are mixed with economi

    social actors, such as amily, schoo

    work opportunities.

    Contrary to rumours in the medi

    there is no environmental migratio

    agreement between Tuvalu and Ne

    Zealand. The Pacic Access Catego

    a scheme that allows an annual qu

    o Pacic islanders to settle in New

    land. They are required to meet str

    gent conditions, including a good cmand o English and the oer o a j

    A seasonal migration scheme has a

    been implemented to allow the isla

    ers to come and work, predominan

    ly in the agricultural sector, or six

    nine months. Neither New Zealand

    Australia has planned or any proa

    migration policy.

    main SouRce: Gemenne, F., and Shen, S.,2009. Tuvalu and New Zealand. EACH-F

    banglaDeSh:Between sea-level rise andmelting glaciersby: Vikram Kolmannskog

    As citizens o a delta-nation, Bangla-

    deshis are used to living with and ben-

    efting rom ooding, but now climate

    change is contributing to an increase

    in oods, riverbank erosion, cyclones

    and other disasters. The country is

    aced with sea-level rise rom one side

    and melting Himalayan glaciers aect-

    ing the rivers on the other side. A sea-

    level rise o one metre would threaten

    to put 50 per cent o the country un-

    der water.

    A high number o Bangladeshis have

    already lost their livelihoods as a re-

    sult o natural disasters, and have been

    orced to look or work elsewhere. To-

    day, most Bangladeshi migration is in-

    ternal, and predominantly rom rural

    to urban areas. In some cases heads o

    households migrate temporarily to nd

    work, in others, entire amilies move

    and settle permanently.

    Many people also settle illegally in In-

    dia in search o a better lie. Oten they

    end up in prostitution, or in sweatshops

    under slave-like conditions, or are de-

    ported. The massive movements that

    are likely in 20 or 30 years could also

    pose a threat to regional security. Oth-

    ers do not have the means to migrate.

    Trafcking, particularly o women and

    children, has been reinorced by recent

    disasters and increased vulnerability.

    Bangladesh is oten highlighted as a

    country that has managed to reduce

    casualties and economic loss by good

    disaster-risk management. The ofcialdeath tolls in recent disasters are ar

    lower than in previous ones. One im-

    portant measure has been the building

    ostorm shelters in villages at risk. This

    saves human lives, and livestock, and

    resources. As a result people in these

    villages eel less and are thereore less

    inclined to move.

    main SouRce: Poncelet, A., 2009, Bangladesh.EACH-FOR.

    whether the environmental disruption is

    climate-related or not.

    One approach that has been discussed

    s expanding so-called complementa-

    ry protection. Complementary orms o

    protection have been granted to people

    who do not t so well into the reugee

    denition, but nonetheless are consid-

    ered to be in need o protection. Oten

    this protection is based on human rights.

    In the case o environmental displace-

    ment, academics have ocused on the

    prohibition to return anyone to torture,

    nhuman or degrading treatment, also

    known as non-reoulement. NRC has

    taken this line, says Trebbi. Persons

    with particular vulnerabilities should be

    protected against return to the very di-

    cult circumstances that exist during

    and ater a major disaster. Finnish and

    Swedish immigration laws even contain

    explicit provisions to extend either tem-

    porary or permanent protection to or-

    eign nationals who cannot return saely

    to their home country because o an en-

    vironmental disaster.

    PRoTecTion fRom youR oWn STaTeWhile much o the ocus is on the norma-

    tive gap or cross-border displaced per-

    sons, most people want to, or have to,

    remain within their own country. This in-

    cludes people moving because o climate

    change and natural disasters. In their

    case there is already a normative rame-

    work in place. The Guiding Principles

    on Internal Displacement already provide

    a sound ramework to protect those dis-

    placed within their own country, clari-

    es Dr. Trk.

    Experts are quick to admit that the ex-

    stence o a normative ramework does

    not in itsel solve all problems. Among

    the Guiding Principles we nd participa-

    tion and non-discrimination. Yet, when

    the Asian Tsunami hit Sri Lanka in 2004,

    certain sher olk were permanently re-

    ocated inland with no means o survival

    allegedly, or their own saety. However,

    the danger o living so close to the sea

    was not so great that tourist resorts could

    not be built on their ormer land. In con-

    nection with Hurricane Katrina in 2005,

    the US authorities were criticised or

    discriminating against poor Aro-Amer-

    cans. For example, the evacuation plan

    was to take your car and drive as ast as

    you could out o there, but not everyone

    had a car.

    In some cases, correct implementation

    is not a matter o will, but o ability. With

    more than 11 million people displaced

    as a result o oods l ast summer, the Pa-

    kistani authorities were overwhelmed

    by the extent o the disaster. The inter-

    national humanitarian agencies were o

    crucial help, says Trebbi o the NRC.

    The organisation played a role in distrib-

    uting tents and other emergency equip-

    ment.

    migRaTion aS a SoluTionWe are working with the assumption

    that the displacement dimension will

    in all probability be dwared by the mi-

    gration dimension, says Dr. Trk at UN-

    HCR. While most experts and humani-

    tarians seem to agree on this, the debate

    has largely ocused on sudden-onset dis-

    asters, and displacement. So how should

    we address slow-onset disasters such as

    drought and the grey area between volun-

    tary migration and orced displacement?

    Dr. Trk shares some reections. Mi-

    gration will be both a rational and in-

    evitable adaptation strategy to climate

    change processes. Migration-manage-

    ment systems should be more sensitive

    to the migration needs o those impacted

    by the environment.

    Proessor McAdam believes that this

    has both an internal and an external di-

    mension.

    First, aected states need to identiy

    vulnerable areas and determine whether

    or not adaptation will enable people to

    continue living in them. I not, they need

    to consider internal migration strategies.

    Secondly, other countries should con-

    sider expanding migration opportunities

    to acilitate international movement by

    those who desire it.

    There is agreement that some o the

    most vulnerable people do not have

    the resources to move at all. A particu-

    lar acilitation o their migration may be

    needed.

    global guiDing PRinciPleSWhile there may be little political appetite

    or a new convention at this time, there has

    been some talk o taking an approach simi-

    lar to the Guiding Principles on Internal

    Displacement and trying to come up with

    global guiding principles on environmen-

    tal displacement. Guiding principles would

    have an inormative and guiding value or

    states and humanitarian actors as well as

    some normative orce i agreed upon by

    several states and important actors.

    The Norwegian Foreign Minister, Jo-

    nas Gahr Stre, sees potential in this

    approach: It is quite possible that the

    Guiding Principles on Internal Displace-

    ment could be used as a basis or ad-

    dressing sudden-onset environmental

    displacement across borders.

    UNHCR is pinning high hopes on the

    Nansen Conerence. They would also like

    to see the development o some guiding

    principles. It would be an important

    contribution i the conerence were to

    recommend some basic principles, espe-

    cially regarding the protection o those

    displaced across international borders,

    says Dr Trk.

    Clearly, the question o protection or

    people migrating or displaced in the con-

    text o climate change is a complex one.

    Some people should be protected as reu-

    gees or internally displaced persons, ac-

    cording to existing law. For others, legal

    innovations may be needed. Perhaps this

    year will see the development o some

    Nansen Principles.

    main SouRceS:Climate change and displacement, Forced Mi-gration Review 31, 2008.Inormal Group on Migration/Displacement andClimate Change o the IASC, 2008.Climate Change, Migration and Displacement:Who will be aected?: Working paper submittedby the inormal group on Migration/ Displace-ment and Climate Change o the IASC. UN-FCCC.Kolmannskog, V., 2009. Climate Changed: Peo-ple Displaced. Oslo: NRC.Ramesh, R., 2008. Paradise almost lost: Mal-dives seek to buy a new homeland.Guardian, 10 November 2008, available at:http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/nov/10/maldives-climate-change [accessed 29April 2011]UN High Commissioner or Reugees, ClimateChange, Natural Disasters andHuman Displacement: A UNHCR Perspective,

    14 August 2009, available at: http://www.unhcr.org/reworld/docid/4a8e48b2.html [accessed27 April 2011]CRED (Centre or Research on the Epidemiolo-gy o Disasters), 2010. 2010 Disastersin Numbers.IDMC, 2011. Preliminary fgures or 2010.IPCC, 2007. The Fourth Assessment Report.Kolmannskog, V., 2009. Climate Changed: Peo-ple Displaced. Oslo: NRC.Under-Secretary-General or Humanitarian A-airs and Emergency Relie Coordinator, 2008.Opening Remarks. Dubai International Humani-tarian Aid and Development Conerence and Ex-hibition. Dubai 8 April 2008.

    SeRiouS PRoblem: while a sinking island-state scenario is a serious one, the number o peaected will be relatively small. E lsewhere, millions may be threatened. The man pictured his just one o the 11 million people displaced by the oods in Pakistan.

  • 8/3/2019 Perspective Nr. 2 - 2011

    12/31

    22PersPectiveNO. 02.2011

    PersPectiveNO. 02.2011

    Climate Change and displaCement

    The worlds leaders are locked in a battle over futureglobal power, causing the worst possible environmentfor reaching the consensus needed to reduce climatechange.

    Deadlockedby: Linda Jeanette GresslienEveryone agrees that climate change

    must be addressed now, beore the conse-

    quences become unmanageable. Even so,

    there is little or no progress in internation-

    al negotiations on emission reductions.

    Why are global leaders so incapable o

    reaching consensus?

    The answer to that is complex, but a

    undamental aspect is the geopolitical ri-

    valry between China and the US. Neither

    country wants to be the rst to commit to

    reductions in green house gas emissions

    that may jeopardize economic expansion.

    As long as US domestic concerns make

    t impossible to win Senate approval or

    emission restrictions, little progress will be

    orthcoming on the international scene.

    Their xation on each other necessarily

    paralyses international cooperation, given

    that the US is unable to implement eec-

    tive climate policies due to its domestic po-

    itical situation, says Proessor Sebastian

    Oberthr, Academic Director o the Insti-

    tute or European Studies at the Vrije Uni-

    versiteit in Brussels.

    The uS, china anD euOver the past three decades, nine environ-

    mental treaties have been negotiated and

    signed by the US, including the 1997 Kyo-

    to Protocol. None received enough votes

    to enable Senate ratication, and it now

    seems clear that within the US administra-

    tion there is no wish or a new agreement

    because they are themselves unable to

    commit to much action.

    When no pre-existing domestic regu-

    lation exists, powerul interest groups,

    like the oil, coal, utility and manuactur-

    ing industries, ear environmental legisla-

    tion will hurt them economically. Senators

    rom regions highly dependent on these

    industries, thereore, consistently vote

    against the introduction o mandatory cli-

    mate- policy measures.

    A more useul approach to unlocking the

    situation would be to establish a coalition

    between China and the other advanced de-

    veloped countries, Oberthr believes. He

    thinks such an agreement would have vital

    inuence on the US domestic climate de-

    bate, thereby creating possibilities or the

    US to implement measures linked to the

    agreement. Such an agreement would also

    make it possible or the EU to regain a lead-ing position in the global climate debate.

    Ever since the negotiations on the Cli-

    mate Change Convention in 1991, the EU

    has been a driving orce in the shaping o

    international climate policies. With a tar-

    get o a 30 per cent emission reduction,

    the EU is still trying to push emission re-

    ductions internationally, but in Copen-

    hagen the EU learned the lesson that, as

    a medium-sized power in climate politics

    - when compared to the two biggest emit-

    Over the three past decades, nine environmental treatieswere negotiated and signed by the US, including the 1997 Kyotoprotocol, but did not receive enough votes or Senate ratifcation

    SoluTionS: adaptation measures might reduce displacement caused by climate-change. However, only an international ag reement to reduce greenhouse gas emissions can signifcantly reduce the risk owidespread uture displacement. The photo shows a group o displaced people rom southern Ethiopia. The woman on the stretcher is pregnant, and too weak to walk.

  • 8/3/2019 Perspective Nr. 2 - 2011

    13/31

    24PersPectiveNO. 02.2011

    PersPectiveNO. 02.2011

    Climate Change and displaCement

    ters, the US and China - it cannot deter-

    mine neither the agenda or the outcome

    onegotiations

    PReScRiTPTion foR DiSaSTeRDuring the Copenhagen Climate coner-ence in 2009, several issues proved impos-

    sible to resolve, including the number o

    international agreements to be negotiated,

    the uture o the Kyoto Protocol; i.e. the

    targets or maximum global temperature

    increase, carbon concentrations and ag-

    gregate emission reductions, the method

    o determining country targets, and the

    role o agricultural and orestry policies.

    Only two main outcomes were pro-

    duced; the tentative political declara-

    tion and the continuation o UN nego-

    tiations. The Copenhagen Accord is an

    agreement among heads o governments

    alluding to limiting temperature rise to

    2 degrees Celsius. Targets or industrial-

    ized countries and actions or developingcountries were set to be dened volun-

    tarily; an outcome that WAS - according

    to James Hansen, head o the NASA God-

    dard Institute or Space Studies in New

    York City - grossly unair to the next gen-

    eration, and a prescription or di saster.

    We cannot seem to nd a nation that

    is willing to stand up and tell the truth. I

    we allow warming o 2 degrees Celsius,

    we will have set the planet on an unstop-

    pable course back toward Pliocene con-

    ditions, when sea level was 15-25 meters

    higher than today, Hansen says.

    abDicaTionS of ReSPonSibiliTieSAccording to Bjrn Samset, senior re-

    search ellow at the Center or Inter-national Climate and Environmental

    Research, global leaders acknowledge hu-

    man-induced climate change, and its con-

    sequences. He underlines, however, that

    one important challenge is the abdication

    o responsibilities.

    Frustration at the lack o results in glob-

    al negotiations has led politicians and en-

    vironmental activists, such as, or exam-

    ple, ormer Caliornia Governor, Arnold

    Swarzenegger, to initiate talks at a sub-

    The coPenhagen ac-coRD non binDingcommiTmenT

    TemPeRaTuReS - Governments will

    work to combat climate change"recognizing the scientifc view thatthe increase in global tempera-ture should be below 2 degreesCelsius"

    gReenhouSe gaS emiSSionS - TheAccord does not set targets orgreenhouse gas emissions exceptto urge "deep cuts in global emis-sions".

    aDaPTaTion - The Accord prom-ises to help countries adapt tothe damaging impacts o climate

    change such as droughts, stormsor rising sea levels.

    2020 TaRgeTS - In an annex, richnations list national goals or cutsin greenhouse gas emissions, and

    developing nations set measuresto slow the rise o emissions by2020.

    veRificaTion - Developed nationswill submit emissions goals orUN review. Developing nations'actions will be under domes-tic review i unded by their ownbudgets but "subject to interna-tional measurement, reporting andverifcation" when unded by or-eign aid.

    DefoReSTaTion - The text sees a"crucial role" or slowing deorest-

    ation trees store carbon dioxideas they grow.

    maRkeTS - The accord says coun-tries will "pursue various ap-proaches, including opportunities

    to use markets" to curb emissions.aiD - Developed nations promisenew and additional unds "ap-proaching $ 30 billion or 2010-12" to help developing countries.In the longer term, "developedcountries commit to a goal o mo-bilizing jointly $100 billion a yearby 2020". S ources o fnance arenot settled.

    gReen funD - Countries will setup a "Copenhagen Green ClimateFund" to help channel aid. Thedeal will also set up a "Technology

    Mechanism" to accelerate use ogreen technologies.

    RevieW - The accord will be re-viewed in 2015.

    kyoTo PRoTocolThe Kyoto Protocol is an inter-national agreement linked to thUnited Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Themajor eature o the Kyoto Protocol is that it sets binding targetor 37 industrialized countriesand the European community oreducing greenhouse gas emis-sions. These amount to an aver-age o fve per cent against 199levels over the fve-year period2008-2012.

    aDaPTing: the changing weather and climate is orcing people to take measures to adapt to new circumstances. Many move to large, urban centres where they end up among the urban poor.

  • 8/3/2019 Perspective Nr. 2 - 2011

    14/31

    26PersPectiveNO. 02.2011

    PersPectiveNO. 02.2011

    Climate Change and displaCement

    Somalia:Secondary Displacementby: Vikram Kolmannskog

    Most Somalis are pastoralists, and they

    have always moved to greener pastures

    during droughts. A dierence now is that

    the droughts aect even the traditional

    areas they migrated to in times o hard-

    ship. Some resort to erratic and abnor-

    mal migration. Others settle in the citieswhere they oten become part o the ur-

    ban poor.

    There are also massive movements to

    areas with rain. Today, mobile phones

    enable people to inorm each other

    about areas o rainall, and as a result

    wealthier pastoralists transport large

    numbers o livestock by trucks to these

    areas, thereby creating a sudden and

    massive pressure on pasture land. This,

    in turn, oten makes the area more prone

    to environmental degradation; which

    creases competition or scarce resou

    causes conict, and triggers urther d

    placement.

    Drought also contributes to anoth

    orm o secondary and long-distance

    placement. In war-torn South and Ce

    tral Somalia, some people rst escap

    the violence in Mogadishu and go to

    countryside, or another Somalian tow

    but drought and environmental degr

    tion in these areas, orce them to mo

    urther. Some end up in Kenya or oth

    countries.

    main SouRce: Kolmannskog, V., 2010. Climchange, human mobility, and protection: Initevidence rom Arica. Reugee Survey Qua29, pp. 103-119.

    In war-tornSouth and CentralSomalia, some people

    frst escape the violencein Mogadishu and goto the countryside,or another Somaliantown, but drought andenvironmental degra-dation in these areas,

    orce to move urther.

    Our parents hon-estly did not know thattheir actions could harm

    uture generations, we,the current generation,can only pretend that wedid not know.JameS hanSen, NASA Goddard Institute orSpace Studies

    national level. While such talks may have

    a more realistic chance o reaching agree-

    ment on emission reductions, other ex-

    perts stress the importance o continuing

    the process towards an eective legally

    binding multilateral ramework, because

    ultimately - that is what is needed or air,

    sustained and eective global action.

    James Hansen, however, stresses that

    the only way o going global is to im-

    pose an across-the-board ee on all ossil

    uels. He nds that the Kyoto protocol has

    proved to be inefcient; emissions were

    increasing by 1.5 per cent annually prior

    to the protocol; since then they have in-

    creased 2.5 per cent per year. In order to

    have a chance o stabilizing the climate,

    he claims, emissions would need to de-

    crease by 5 per cent annually. Instead

    ossil uels are currently subsidized, both

    directly and indirectly. Since countries

    like China and India never will accept a (n

    emission) cap, a carbon ee is the only ap-

    proach to a rapid decrease in emissions.

    noRTh SouTh inJuSTiceIn act, a majority o developing countries

    reject any limitation o their uture emis-

    sions in order to solve a problem that, so

    ar, has largely been created elsewhere.

    Powerul industrial nations, on the other

    hand, ear losing comparative advantages

    and reuse to curtail their own excesses un-

    less developing countries make similar sac-

    rices. At the Cancun conerence, the West

    accepted voluntary actions by developing

    countries and agreed to provide partial -

    nance. Nevertheless, the money and con-

    cessions had little impact on negotiations;

    China, Brazil and India never reciprocated

    with any compromises. Thus negotiations

    o these reorms remain ambiguous. A pos-

    sible solution is or the North to provide

    large-scale nancial and technical support,

    but there exists a trust issue.

    The South ear that i it were to accept

    its air share o the climate burden, the

    North would take unair advantages o itsexibility, holding it hostage to its newly-

    made commitments while continuing to

    dodge their own. The North doubts that

    the South is committed to solving the cli-

    mate problem, and ear being locked to

    a system in which the North are obliged

    to nance climate measures, whilst the

    South are allowed to ree ride orever.

    inTeRgenaTaTonal inJuSTiceBjrn Samseth states that there is no long-

    er an issue o whether or not we will ex-

    ceed global 2C target; it will most certain-

    ly happen, but we can delay the process,

    giving us time to adjust.

    It is highly unlikely that the November

    2011 Climate Conerence in South Arica

    will provide any tangible results. One

    o the major issues will most certainly

    be the question o the international le-

    gal ramework or cooperation, and in

    particular the uture o the Kyoto Proto-

    col. The EU is likely to ace considerable

    pressure to agree to a second commit-

    ment period under the Protocol, thereby

    securing its continuation beyond 2012.

    However, among the negotiating parties,

    nancial interests still seem to outweigh

    climate-change concerns, and experts

    and activists do not hold high hopes that

    an agreement will be reached.

    According to Hansen the basic issue

    should not be economics, but inter-genera-

    tional justice.Our parents honestly did not

    know that their actions could harm uture

    generations, we, the current generation,

    can only pretend that we did not know.

    SouRceS:EU Leadership on Climate Change: Living up tothe Challenges - Article by Pro. Dr. SebastianOberthr.Global Climate Governance ater Cancun: Op-tions or EU Leadership - Article by Pro.Dr. Se-

    bastian Oberthr.Signed but Not Ratifed: Limits to U.S. Participa-tion in International Environmental Agreements -Article by Guri Bang (CICERO).Innside Copenhagen: The State o Climate Gov-ernance - Article by Radoslav S. Dimi trov.The Case or Young People and Nature: A Pathto a Healthy, Natural, Prosperous Future - Articleby James Hansen ( Columbia University EarthInstitute, New YorkReuters- Factbox: The Copenhagen Accord andglobal warming.http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/03/31/us-climate-accord-actbox-idUS-TRE62U1B120100331

    aDaPTaTion To climaTechange

    examPleS of aDaPTion meThoDS:

    human healTh

    Moderate temperature increases byplanting trees Prepare grain storages or emergency

    eeding stations

    WaTeR

    Promote shore protection techniques Improve early warning systems and

    ood hazard maps or storms Protect water supplies rom contami-

    nation by saltwater

    agRiculTuRe anD foReSTRy

    Alter the timing o planting dates toadapt to changing growing conditions Alter cropping mix and orest species

    that are better suited climate change Breed new plant species and crops

    that are more tolerant to climate change.

    uniTeD naTionS fRame-WoRk convenTion on cli-maTe change (unfccc)

    The parties to the convention have metannually since 1995 in a Conerences othe Parties (COP) to assess progress indealing with climate change.

    1997 - coP 3: Kyoto, Japan. Most industri-alized countries and some central Euro-pean economies in transition agreed tolegally binding reductions in greenhousegas emissions or the period 2008-2012.The protocol was rejected by the US in2001.

    2009 coP 15: Copenhagen, Denmark.The overall goal was to establish a newglobal climate commitment rom the pe-riod rom 2012 onward. The negotiationshad unresolved issues and resulted onlyin a non-binding agreement The Co-penhagen Accord.

    2010 - coP 16: Cancun, Mexico. The con-erence ailed to achieve a second com-mitment period or the Kyoto Protocol,but reassured a continued process under

    the UN ramework. It agreed a "GreenClimate Fund", a "Climate TechnologyCentre" and the need or internationalcoordination and cooperation with regardto climate change induced displacement,migration and planned relocation. TheCancun agreements are criticized or notproviding concrete proposals or how theclimate und will be fnanced.

    2011- coP 17: Durban, South Arica. A pri-mary ocus o the next conerence will beto secure a global climate agreement asthe Kyoto Protocols frst commitment pe-riod (2008-2012) is about to end.

    DRoughT: drought and soil erosion present a serious problem in many parts o the world. This photograph is o a dried-out river bed in Tigray, EthiopiaIn Somalia, droughts are a n important cause o displacement, whilst Guatemal a, Honduras and Nicaragua have suered several seasons o severedrought.

  • 8/3/2019 Perspective Nr. 2 - 2011

    15/31

    28PersPectiveNO. 02.2011

    Climate Change and displaCement

    DiSPlaceDby naTuRalDiSaSTeRS

    figuRe 1: 2008-2010 Countries with the highest levels o displacement

    Europe andOceania

    Asia Americas Arica

    Asia was consistently the continent mostaected in terms o the absolute numberand percentage o people displaced. Itwas also the continent where the eventswith the highest number o people dis-placed took place. The Americas and thenArica tend to ollow Asia as the secondand third most aected continents.

    From a global perspective, large-scaledisasters dominated the fgures and theworlds attention, and caused more than90 per cent o total displacement re-ported each year. The most dramatic di-erence between each year can be un-derstood by the size and number o thelargest events or mega-disasters.

    numbeR of PeoPle DiSPlaceD (millionS)

    cauSe of DiSPlacemenT 2008 % 2009 % 2010 %

    climaTe-RelaTeD DiSaSTeRS 20.3 56% 15.2 91% 38.3 90%

    geoPhySical DiSaSTeRS 15.8 44% 1.5 9% 4.0 10%

    ToTal 36.1

    16.7

    42.3

    The orced displacement o men, women and children rom their homes

    by natural disasters is a large-scale, global phenomenon. A report newly re-

    leased by the Norwegian Reugee Councils Internal Displacement Monitor-

    ing Centre, highlights the magnitude o the problem:

    At least 42.3 million people were newly displaced by sudden-onset

    natural disasters in 2010.

    Climate related hazards, such as oods and storms, were responsible or

    most o the displacement each year, and as such the most important driver

    o displacement. With climate change accelerating, this is a challenge that is

    expected to grow.

    figuRe 2: The scale o disasters triggering displacement relative to the global estimate or each year

    2008

    2008

    100 000 000

    90 000 000

    80 000 000

    70 000 000

    60 000 000

    50 000 000

    40 000 000

    30 000 000

    20 000 000

    10 000 000

    0

    50 000 000

    45 000 000

    40 000 000

    35 000 000

    30 000 000

    25 000 000

    20 000 000

    15 000 000

    10 000 000

    5 000 000

    0

    2009

    2009

    2010

    2010

    all yeaRS

    Displacement by medium-small disas-ters (Less than 100,000 displaced perevent)Displacement by large disasters(100,000 - 999,999 displaced per event)Displacement by mega-disasters(1 million and over displaced per event)

    While the global estimates highlight therole o the largest disasters and their im-pact on the scale o displacement g lob-ally, smaller scale disasters are ar l ess

    visible. It is more difcult to fnd dataor some countries and regions than orothers. Improved data collection and in-creased sharing o inormation should bepromoted to strengthen the monitoringand response to displacement.

    43 MILLION DISPLACED

    ORDINARY PEOPLE DOINGEXTRAORDINARY WORK

    www.norcapweb.no

    NORCAP (Norwegian Capacity) is the worlds most frequentlyused emergency standby roster. Since 1991 we have secondedpersonnel to more than 6000 assignments globally. NORCAP

    consists of 850 ordinary women and men who are ready to deployto international operations within 72 hours.

  • 8/3/2019 Perspective Nr. 2 - 2011

    16/31

    30PersPectiveNO. 02.2011

    PersPectiveNO. 02.2011

    profile Kristalina GeorgievaShe became EU commissioner almost by accident,but Kristalina Georgievasleadership of the European Unions department for humanitarian aid and crisisresponse has brought her both praise and popularity.

    Preparing forDangerous TimesI oten say that I have the best job in the Commission, because

    t is about helping people in their most dire moment o need.

    But it is also the worst job, because there are so many people

    who need help, and unortunately these numbers are not de-

    clining, Georgieva explains.

    PASSIONATE TRAVELLER

    My interview with Georgieva takes place in her spacious oce

    n the Berlaymont building in Brussels. It is the end o a busy

    day, in particular or Georgieva, who had spent the previous

    night travelling back rom Washington. Nonetheless she shows

    no sign o jet lag.

    I was well trained in my previous job in the World Bank,

    she says, that position also required a lot o travelling, and I

    have a very good team that provides the help I need to be able

    to maintain the energy my job requires.

    Travelling takes up a lot o her time. In addition she also has

    to travel to Soa in order to spend time with her amily. Her

    husband and daughter live in the Bulgarian capital, Soa. Fortu-

    nately she claims to be a passionate traveller.

    CONFLICT AND DISASTER

    In recent months, much o Georgievas time has been dedicated

    to orming and implementing EU policies designed to alleviate

    the grim consequences o the Arab uprisings. In early March,

    as part o this eort, she travelled to Tunisia to inspect camps

    which were being overwhelmed by tens o thousands o migrantworkers feeing the violence in Libya. She has also been deeply

    nvolved in the successul evacuation o between 5 and 6,000

    European Union citizens rom Libya, and the EUs eorts to as-

    sist the more than 700,000 third country nationals, that fed

    Libya, to return home.

    As events unolded in North Arica and the Middle East, ca-

    tastrophe struck on the other side o the world, in Japan. At the

    end o March, Georgieva was the rst high-level internation-

    al politician to visit Japan to witness the consequences o the

    earthquake, the subsequent tsunami, and nuclear crisis that

    struck the country.

    INTERNATIONAL CAREER

    Though still frmly linked to her home country through am-

    ily ties, Kristalina Georgieva has not worked in Bulgaria since

    1991. She let to pursue a career as an environmental econo-

    mist, frst as a visiting proessor at a number o universities

    around the world, later as a consultant to the World Bank,

    which very soon decided to employ her. In the course o the

    next 16 years she rose through the World Bank hierarchy, run-

    ning World Bank programmes in Russia, Asia, China and the

    Pacifc region, beore becoming Vice-President o the Bank in

    2008.

    She remained in this position until, quite unexpectedly

    and it the middle o the night - Bulgarian Prime Minister,

    Boyko Borisov phoned to ask i she would agree to become

    Bulgarias nominee to the EU Commission. Only a ew days

    earlier, Borisovs frst choice or the position, Bulgarian or-

    eign minister, Rumina Jeleva, had come under strong pres-

    sure during a hearing beore the European Parliament, when

    representatives started raising doubts about her qualifca-

    tions and fnancial interests.

    I took the job or two reasons; it was necessary or Bulgaria

    to nominate a new candidate as quickly as possible and, giv-

    en the nature o the portolio, I elt that that I was qualied,

    Georgieva says.

    A POPULAR POLITICIAN

    In the short time she has been in oce, Kristalina Georgievahas managed to impress many people, both in Brussels and

    beyond. 11 months ater she became a commissioner, readers

    o the Brussels based EU-aairs newspaper, European Voice,

    named her both European Commissioner o the Year and Euro-

    pean o the Year. Her success was endorsed by NGO representa-

    tives, colleagues and associates in the EU capital.

    These rewards also triggered praise and enthusiasm in her

    home country. The Bulgarian media speculated in the possi-

    bility that Georgieva might stand as presidential candidate or

    the ruling centre-right party GERB in the 2011 presidential elec-

    tions. These rumours have since been denied.

    There isa new breed

    of politicianswho support

    left-wing orright-wing views

    depending onthe issues. I am

    one of them.

    By: Birgit Vartdal

    EU COmmISSIONER: Kristalina Georgieva is one o the worlds most inuential aid politicians. As head o the EUs department or humanitarian responshe controls the worlds second largest aid budget. Photo: European Parli

  • 8/3/2019 Perspective Nr. 2 - 2011

    17/31

    32PersPectiveNO. 02.2011

    PersPectiveNO. 02.2011

    CONSERVATIVE AND LEFT-WING

    Georgieva is not member o any political party, and she has

    been a technocrat all her lie. She does, however, have strong

    inks to GERB. Asked to place hersel upon the traditional let-

    wing, right-wing political spectrum, she says:

    There is a new breed o politicians who support let-wing

    or right-wing views depending on the issues. I am one o them.

    When it comes to scal matters and economic discipline, I

    place mysel on the conservative side. In issues related to de-

    velopment, human rights and the envi-

    ronment, I belong to the political let.

    GERB is a centre-right party, but it is also

    a party that on many domestic issues

    acts more like a centre-let party, she ex-

    plains.

    Kristalina Georgieva does ollow Bul-

    garian politics, but it is EU policy that lls

    her agenda.I always ocus on the job I have. As

    ong as I am in this job it has my ull dedi-

    cation ,and I have three and a hal years

    to go, she laughs.

    DANGEROUS FUTURE

    When Georgieva came into oce, one o her rst policy initia-

    tives was to start preparing the EU or a uture that was likely

    to experience more requent and more serious disasters. Her

    communication on strengthening European disaster response

    was published in October last year.

    This is a very pragmatic approach to strengthening Europes

    ability to deliver support in times o disaster. It has ve clear

    and concrete steps: rstly, introduce more scenario planning;

    in other words, anticipate what type o disasters that are likely

    to happen, secondly, appraise the EUs collective humanitarian

    resources, thirdly, determine what resources we do not have,

    and decide on the best ways o acquiring them, ourthly, organ-

    ise our logistics and transport in advance and, nally, establish

    a European emergency response-centre to coordinate our ac-

    tions, she explains.

    The new European emergency re-

    sponse centre is scheduled to be opera-

    tional at the end o 2011.

    AID IN TImES OF CRISIS

    Another topic keeping Kristalina Geor-

    gieva busy, is the ongoing debate over the

    EUs multi-annual nancial ramework.Her aim is to secure an annual outlay o 1

    billion euro or humanitarian aid, an ob-

    jective she thinks it should be possible to

    achieve even in times o nancial crisis.

    I think we have a strong case. We need to relate this und-

    ing request to events that have taken place over the last years.

    Needs are increasing, and EU spending on humanitarian meas-

    ures has already reached a level o a billion euro or more. We

    have made a commitment to the UN to spend 0.7 per cent o

    our GDP or development purposes, including humanitarian

    aid, Georgieva argues.

    AID AND INDEPENDENCy

    The debate over the new long term EU budget has also created

    concerns about the independent standing o humanitarian aid.

    Reports earlier this year suggested that the humanitarian aid

    dossier could all under the purview o the blocs new external

    action service led by Catherine Ashton.

    Over my dead body! Kristalina Georgieva exclaimed (accord-

    ing to the EUobserver) when, in February, she was conronted

    with these rumours in ront o a Brussels audience. Now, a ew

    months later, her response is more relaxed.

    She says she is confdent that EU aid will

    never become a oreign policy tool, as it is,

    or example, in the United States.

    I am very confdent that Europe has

    made the right choice to keep humanitar-

    ian aid impartial, independent and neutral.

    In 2009, or the frst time, Europe also es-

    tablished a commissionaire o humanitar-ian aid, and it is my duty to protect this in-

    dependence, she says, characterising the

    uncertainty still voiced among humanitar-

    ian aid workers as a natural reaction to the ongoing changes in the

    EU administration.

    When change takes place, there is o course uncertainty, as

    well as a risk o wrong decisions being made. But we are now

    beyond that stage; rstly, it is now clear that the humanitar-

    ian unding instrument will be independent rom the oreign

    policy instrument. Secondly, it has been decided that my ser-

    vice will stay outside the external action service. And thirdly,

    we have -via precedence established a working partnershi

    in which we collaborate without sacricing the independe

    that is so important or humanitarian workers, the EU aid

    chie adds.

    SOLIDARITy

    In her recent visits to Japan and Libya, Kristalina Georgieva

    was impressed by the resilience shown by ordinary people

    ing under dicult circumstances. In her blog she chronicle

    her personal impressions rom the e

    and refects upon what lessons can b

    learned rom these tragedies.

    While Libya and the Ivory Coast a

    marked by conficts grounded in sup

    pression o some people by others. In

    pan it was a orce o nature that brou

    the country to its knees. This taught

    that even the best prepared [or t ackling disasters] are no longer sae. My

    counterpart on disasters in the US sa

    something very important when we m

    recently. He said: while we have a tradition to prepare or t

    disasters we can imagine, we now have to prepare or the u

    thinkable - or the disasters we dont have the skills to addre

    would add that in the ace o disasters we all have to be hum

    and accept that we need to build global solidarity, because

    the uture it will no longer be a question o developed coun

    helping developing countries, it will be about human race,

    ryone helping each other, says Kristalina Georgieva.

    KRISTALINA

    GEORGIEVA

    BORN: Sofa, Bulgaria, 1953

    EDUCATION: M.A in Political Ecoomy Sociology (1976). Ph.D inEnvironmental Economics (198

    CAREER: currently serving as European commissioner or inter-national co-operation, humanitaian aid and crisis response. Shestarted her career as assistant,then proessor at the Universityo National and World EconomySofa (1977-93). Later she hepositions as visiting proessor aa number o universities aroundthe world. In 1992, she becamea consultant to the World Bankon environmental policy. In thecourse o the next 16 years sherose through the hierarchy, run-ning programmes in Russia, AsChina and the Pacifc region, be

    ore becoming Vice-President othe World Bank in 2008.

    IN ThE FIELD 3: visiting disaster areas in order to a ssess the situation frst hand is an important parto Georgievas job. In August 2010, she visited Pachwar, Pakistan, and talked to people aectedby the Pakistan oods. Photo: EU/AFP/Katsumi Kasahara

    N ThE FIELD 1: Georgieva and President Salva Kiir Mayardit discussing theon-going humanitarian problems in South Sudan.

    Photo: EU/AFP/Katsumi Kasahara

    IN ThE FIELD 2: at the end o March 2011, Georgieva travelled to Japan to oversee the delivery o aid romthe EU and to discuss civil protection with the Japanese authorities. The EU aid shipment contained 70 tonso relie items, including blankets, mattresses and sleeping bags. Photo: EU/AFP/Katsumi Kasahara

    profile Kristalina Georgieva

    I always ocuson the job I have. Aslong as I am in this

    job it has my ulldedication.

    I am very conf-dent that Europe hasmade the right choice

    to keep humanitar-ia