Performance Budgeting and Budgeting Reform
-
Upload
morgan-hogan -
Category
Documents
-
view
117 -
download
30
description
Transcript of Performance Budgeting and Budgeting Reform
Performance Budgeting and Budgeting Reform
Performance Budgeting Course,
APFDC, Shanghai, October 2010
Prepared by Marc Robinson1
绩效预算及预算改革
绩效预算课程 APFDC ,上海 2010 年 10 月
Budgeting reform broader than PB 预算改革比绩效预算面广 Elements of budgeting reform are more fundamental
预算改革中的要素更为重要◦ Should precede PB 预算改革应该先于绩效预算
Elements of reform which should accompany introduction of PB 伴随绩效预算采用过程的改革要素◦ To help it to succeed 以促使绩效预算成功
Relation between PB and Medium-Term Budgeting 绩效预算与中期预算的关系
This Session
2
本节要点
Budgeting framework capable of controlling aggregate spending 能够控制总支出的预算框架◦ Able to ensure fiscal sustainability 能够确保财政可持续性
System capable of ensuring public money spent on approved purposes
能够确保公共资金被用于被批准用途的系统◦ Probity 公正性
If these don’t exist, focus on them prior to introducing performance budgeting!!
如果这些先觉条件不存在,那么,在采用绩效预算之前重点考虑它们
Budgeting prerequisites for PB
3
绩效预算的预算前提条件
Budgeting reforms to support performance budgeting
4
支持绩效预算的预算改革
PB too often a purely technical exercise: 绩效预算常常是一种纯粹的技术性工作:
◦ In generating performance information 产生绩效信息◦ Budget classification by programs 按项目进行预算分类◦ Performance indicators etc 绩效指标等等
And nothing changes 没有改变◦ No impact on budget allocations 对预算分配没有影响◦ No impact on efficiency and effectiveness 对效率和有效性没有影响◦ Performance information not really used 没有真正使用绩效信息
Contrast with successful countries 与成功国家相比 Why? What can be done about this? 为什么?怎么办?
The Challenge
5
面临的问题
Political factors may be to blame:
政治因素可能是罪魁祸首◦ Political system, culture, or leadership 政治制度、文化或领导体系◦ Political focus on performance essential 对绩效的政治关注
Absence of complementary MFR reforms: 缺乏配套的结果导向的管理改革
◦ To make public management results-focused 使公共管理呈结果导向
Budgetary system can be major factor: 预算制度可能是主要因素
1. Prioritization processes weak 预算的优先顺序安排流程不合理2. Expenditure inflexibilities 支出缺乏灵活性
Factors behind failure
6
失败背后的因素
Obstacles to cutting or shifting spending 削减或转移支出时所面临的障碍 Fatal to performance budgeting because: 对绩效预算来说是灾难性的,这是因为
◦ Effectiveness requires spending reallocation 为保证有效性,需要重新分配支出◦ From ineffective/low priority programs 从无效 / 低优先级项目中转移预算◦ Efficiency demands wasteful spending cut 提高效率要求削减浪费的开支
Employment inflexibilities 就业缺乏灵活性◦ Inability to shift or shed civil servants 无法轮岗或裁减公务员
Legally earmarked expenditure: 法律规定的专用支出◦ Can only be used for one purpose 只能被用于单一目的◦ A form of “extra-budgetary fund” 一种“额外预算基金”的形式 ◦ But should be limited 但应在一定限度内
Expenditure Inflexibilities
7
支出缺乏灵活性
PB: use of performance info (PI) in budget 绩效预算:绩效信息在预算中的使用
◦ Prioritization & performance pressure 优先顺序安排和绩效压力 Good PI not enough 只有好的绩效信息是不够的
◦Must be used in budget decisions 必须在预算决策中加以运用
Expenditure prioritization process 支出的优先顺序安排过程◦ Where best to allocate resources 将资源分配到哪儿更好
Two aspects 两个方面◦ What new spending initiatives? 有什么新的支出倡议?◦ Where to cut existing spending ? 现有开支可否削减?
Spending review a particularly critical element 支出审查是个特别关键的因素
◦ Close link with performance budgeting 与绩效预算密切相关
Prioritization & PB
8
优先顺序安排和绩效预算
Processes to identify/make cuts: 确认并消减支出的进程◦ Low-priority and ineffective programs 低优先级和低效率的项目◦ Duplication or conflict between programs 重复项目或存在冲突的项
目◦ Inefficient practices 低效率的做法
Often a weak element of budgeting 通常预算中的薄弱元素◦ Incrementalism 渐进主义
Planning often weak on SR 支出审查环节的计划往往较差◦ More about new spending priorities 更多关于新的支出优先顺序
Spending Review (SR)
9
支出审查
Expenditure management benefits: 支出管理的优点◦ Making room for new spending 为新支出留出空间◦ Maintain control of aggregate spending 保持对支出总额的控制
Performance pressure on ministries: 对政府部门的绩效压力◦ Wish to protect their programs against central SR 希望保护他们的项目免于中央支出审查◦ Link with management improvement and program re-design
processes 与管理水平改善和项目重新设计过程相联系 ‘Whole-of-government’ coordination 整体政府工作的协调
Benefits of SR
10
支出审查的优点
One-off/in-depth SR: 一次性 /深度的支出审查◦ For fiscal consolidation 目的是财政稳固◦ Or change of government 或政府换届
Ongoing SR needed also: 持续性支出审查还需要◦ Regular part of budget preparation 预算编制的常规部分◦ Annual in most countries 大多数国家一年一次◦ Every 2-3 years in some countries 有些国家 2-3 年一次◦ Main focus during this session 本次课程的要点
One-off vs. Ongoing
11
一次性与持续性支出审查
Expenditure Review Committee (ERC) 支出审查委员会◦ Part of annual budget process 年度预算过程的一部分◦ Prime minister and other senior ministers 总理和其他高级部长◦ Reinforces minister of finance 强化财政部长责任
More detailed during consolidations
财政稳固期间更详细 Strong Ministry of Finance support 来自财政部的坚定支持
◦ Detailed advice to the ERC 对支出审查委员会的详细建议 Incentives to spending ministries 对支出部门的激励
◦ Retention of savings 保留储蓄
Australia
12
澳大利亚
Spending Reviews under Labour 工党领导下的支出审查◦ Every three years 每三年一次◦ Process for setting (multi-year) budgets (多年 ) 预算设定程序
“Comprehensive” spending reviews “全面”支出审查◦ More in-depth 更深入◦ But not truly comprehensive 但是,并非真正的全面
Finance minister/ministry process 财政大臣 / 财政部处理◦ No involvement of cabinet 没有内阁参与 ◦ Not even of Prime Minister 甚至首相也不参与 ◦ Reflected specific political situation 反映具体的政治局势
UK
13
英国
Essential information base for SR 支出审查的必要信息基础
◦ Basis for MoF/central agency advice 财政部 / 中央代理机构建议的基础
Focus must be centrally guided 审查重点必须由中央指导◦ Choice of programs, issues to be examined 项目选择,待审查的问题◦ Don’t let spending ministries dictate 不要让支出的部门来独断
Evaluation and external review
14
评价及外部审查
Plan separate from/prior to the budget 计划与预算分离或优先于预算
◦ Public statement of spending priorities 对支出的优先顺序安排进行公开◦ Budget the financial expression of the plan 对计划的财政收支进行预算
Common weaknesses of this approach: 该方法的常见缺陷◦ Fails to really prioritize 没有真正按项目或计划优先顺序来安排◦ Low priorities not identified 不确认优先级别低的项目◦ Only high priorities & often too many 只有高优先级别,并且常常太多◦ Not subject to an explicit budget constraint 没有明确的预算约束◦ Political rhetoric 政治修饰
Planning and the Budget
15
计划及预算
Real prioritization is in the budget: 预算中真正的优先顺序 ◦ Hard budget constraint forces choices 固定的预算约束迫使做出选择◦ Part of, not prior to, budget process 是预算过程的一部分,而不是提前作出
Integrate planning with the budget 将规划和预算结合在一起 Institutional question 体制问题
◦ Separation of planning and finance ministries 计划部门和财政部门分离
Planning and the Budget
16
计划及预算
Model where prioritization delegated to sectoral groups of ministries 给各部委支出的优先顺序安排做模型◦ Within sector envelopes 在部门范围内
Linked with early MTEF models 与早先的中期支出框架模型相联系 Canadian inspiration 加拿大的启示
◦ Policy & Expenditure Management System 政策与支出管理制度 ◦ Sectoral committees not good at identifying cuts 部门委员会不擅长确认预算削减量◦ How to allocate between sectors? 部门之间如何分配 ?
Sector-wide approach
17
全部门办法
The center can’t decide everything 中央不能决定一切 ◦ Can’t make a detailed resource allocation 不能做出详细的资源分配
Much prioritization at ministry level 部委层面大量的优先级处理 Pressure on agencies to allocate better 对机构面临的更好地分配预算的压力 Incentive of retaining savings 保留储蓄的激励
◦ To fund new initiatives 以资助新举措 Central spending review pressure 中央支出审查压力
Prioritization within Ministries
18
部委内的优先顺序处理
Medium-Term Budgeting
19
中期预算
PB often combined with MT budgeting 绩效预算常与中期预算相结合
◦ Elements of budgeting reform package 预算改革方案的原则
Link has long been made 长期有关联◦ View of originators of program budgeting 项目预算创始人的观点
What is the relationship? 它们之间关系是什么◦ Is MT budgeting essential for PB? 中期预算对绩效预算来说必不可少吗?
Start with close look at MT budgeting 首先仔细审视中期预算
◦ Different interpretation and models 不同的解释和模型
PB and Medium-Term Budgeting
20
绩效预算和中期预算
Avoid sudden fiscal adjustments 避免突然的财政调控 ◦ Anticipate expenditure and revenue challenges, and deal
with in advance 预计支出和收入间的矛盾,并预先处理 More sustainable fiscal policy 更多可持续的财政政策
◦ Reduced likelihood of deficits and debt getting out of control 降低赤字和债务失控的可能性
More funding predictability 更大的拨款可预测性 ◦ Sudden cuts less likely 突然裁减预算更小的可能性◦ Better planning and management as results 结果是更好地计划和管理
Objectives of MT Budgeting
21
中期预算的目的
Clear picture of MT fiscal trends 清楚描述中期财政趋势◦ Expenditure & revenue projections 支出及收入预测
MT aggregate fiscal policy 中期总财政政策 ◦ Clear objectives over the MT 清晰的中期目标
Consistent expenditure/revenue policy 一致的支出 /收入政策 ◦ Compatible with fiscal policy over MT 同中期财政政策兼容
MT expenditure ceilings 中期开支上限◦ For ministries and/or aggregate spending 针对政府部门 / 或支出总
额◦ Indicative or fixed? 指导性的或固定不变的?
Medium-Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF) 中期支出框架
◦ Incorporates these – and often other – elements of MT budgeting 除了包括这些,通常还有其他的中期预算框架
Key Elements of MT Budgeting
22
中期预算关键要素
Prioritization in MT perspective: 中期视角的优先级处理◦ Program budgeting approach 项目预算方法◦ Based on program costs and benefits 基于项目的成本和效益◦ MT estimates of program costs superior 中期预算在估计项目成本上占优势◦ Purely annual estimates can be misleading 纯粹的年度估计可能产生误导◦ Allocation decisions can be sustained 分配决策能够持续
Greater security of future funding 未来资金安排更安全
◦ Helps managers on results 帮助管理人员进行结果导向的管理
How MT budgeting helps PB
23
中期预算怎样有助于绩效预算
Program-based Fes◦ Make it possible to develop program-specific expenditure
projections 根据项目来估计支出成为可能 ◦ Better quality Fes◦ To catch cost drivers of expenditure policy 理解支出政策的成本驱动力
PB & Fixed Ministry Ceilings 绩效预算及固定的预算上限◦ Performance information used in budget 预算中使用的绩效信息◦ Essential for good prioritization 对良好优先级处理来说,是必不可少的◦ Which is essential for fixed ceilings 对固定的预算上限来说,哪个是必不可少的
How PB Helps MT Budgeting
24
绩效预算怎样有助于中期预算
Get basics of budgeting right before PB 在绩效预算前了解基本情况
◦ Proper control of spending 适当地控制支出◦ Reasonable level of probity 合理的公正水平
PB needs accompanying budget reforms 绩效预算需要预算同时进行改革
◦ Attack on expenditure rigidities 对支出固定死板的责难◦ Expenditure prioritization process 支出的优先级别安排过程◦ Spending review critical 支出审查十分关键◦ Properly linking planning and budgeting 计划与预算恰当相联
Medium-term budgeting 中期预算◦ Can strongly reinforce performance budgeting 能够极大地增强绩效预算
Conclusions
25
总结