Pension Scheme in Japan
Transcript of Pension Scheme in Japan
1
Pension Scheme in Japan:Pension Scheme in Japan:Problems and Reform EffortsProblems and Reform Efforts
byby
Noriyuki TakayamaNoriyuki Takayama
Professor of Economics, Hitotsubashi UniversityProfessor of Economics, Hitotsubashi [email protected]@ier.hit--u.ac.jpu.ac.jp
http://www.ier.hithttp://www.ier.hit--u.ac.jp/~takayama/u.ac.jp/~takayama/
IUJ Convocation, 23IUJ Convocation, 23rdrd February 2005 February 2005
2
OrganizationOrganization
●● Brief Outline of Pension ProvisionsBrief Outline of Pension Provisions
●● DemographyDemography
●● Basic Facts: Basic Facts:
Identifying Main JPN ProblemsIdentifying Main JPN Problems
●● The 2004 Reform BillThe 2004 Reform Bill
●● Future Policy OptionsFuture Policy Options
●● Concluding RemarksConcluding Remarks
3
Brief Outline of Pension ProvisionsBrief Outline of Pension Provisionsbefore the 2004 Reformbefore the 2004 Reform
●● 22--tier Benefitstier Benefits
●● ContributionsContributions
●● The Biggest BusinessThe Biggest Business
4
TwoTwo--tier Benefits (DB)tier Benefits (DB)
●● Basic FlatBasic Flat--rate Benefits (PM, PP)rate Benefits (PM, PP)
66,200 yen = USD 63066,200 yen = USD 630
●● EarningsEarnings--related Benefits (40Yrs)related Benefits (40Yrs)
28.5% of Career Average Monthly Real 28.5% of Career Average Monthly Real EarningsEarnings
●● Replacement Rate (OneReplacement Rate (One--earner Couple)earner Couple)
Around 60% Net (233,000 yen = USD 2,200)Around 60% Net (233,000 yen = USD 2,200)
●● CPI IndexationCPI Indexation
●● Normal Normal PensionablePensionable Age: 65Age: 65
5
Contributions/Transfer from GRContributions/Transfer from GR
●● ContributionsContributions
13.58% of 13.58% of AnnualAnnual WagesWages
13,300 yen = USD 125 (PM, PP)13,300 yen = USD 125 (PM, PP)●● Subsidy from General RevenueSubsidy from General Revenue
1/3 of Flat1/3 of Flat--rate Basic Benefitsrate Basic Benefits●● Mainly PAYG, but Mainly PAYG, but
with Partial with Partial PrefundingPrefunding
6
The Biggest Business in JapanThe Biggest Business in Japan
●● Aggregate SS Pension Benefits Aggregate SS Pension Benefits
44 tr. Yen = USD 420 billion in 200344 tr. Yen = USD 420 billion in 2003
(9% of Japanese GDP)(9% of Japanese GDP)
cf. The Automobile Industrycf. The Automobile Industry
40 tr. Yen (Domestic Output in 2000)40 tr. Yen (Domestic Output in 2000)
●● Rapidly GrowingRapidly Growing
7
DemographyDemography
●● TFRTFR
●● Total No. of PopulationsTotal No. of Populations
●● Proportion of 65+Proportion of 65+
8
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1945 1955 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005 2015 2025 2035 2045YEAR
1.29 in 2003
1.63
1.39
1.10
high variant
low variant
medium variant
Source: National Institute of Population and Social Security Research (2002), Population Projections for Japan: 2001-2100
Trends in the Total Fertility Rate of Japan
9
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090 2100YEAR
(million)
low variant
medium variant
high variant
Source: National Institute of Population and Social Security Research (2002), Population Projections for Japan: 2001-2100
Actual and Projected Population of Japan
10
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090 2100YEAR
(%)
Year 2005 20.0% (Japan)
high variant
medium variant
low variant
Source: National Institute of Population and Social Security Research (2002), Population Projections for Japan: 2001-2100
Proportion of the Elderly (+65) in Japan
11
Basic Facts Basic Facts
●● Deficit in Current AccountDeficit in Current Account●● Balance Sheet:Balance Sheet:
Huge Excess LiabilitiesHuge Excess Liabilities●● SS Pension Contributions:SS Pension Contributions:
Heavy Burdens OutstandingHeavy Burdens Outstanding●● Too Much Income Transfers between Too Much Income Transfers between
GenerationsGenerations
●● Increasing DropIncreasing Drop--outout
12
2.08
-2.84
3.95
-0.70 -0.61
-4-3-2-1012345
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003(YEAR)
(trillion yen)
Current Account of the KNH
13
920 1100
130
0
500
1,000
1,500(Tr Yen)
PensionLiabilities
Transfers
Contri-butions
((as at 31as at 31stst March 2005March 2005))
Excess LExcess L::50 Tr. Yen50 Tr. Yen
800
170
130
0
500
1,000
1,500
PensionLiabilities
F.R.Transfers
Excess LExcess L::500 Tr. Yen500 Tr. Yen
Part One (PAST)Part One (PAST) Part Two (FUTURE)Part Two (FUTURE)
KNH Balance Sheet:KNH Balance Sheet:Before ReformBefore Reform
Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities
1,050
(Tr Yen)
14
55.6 43.9
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
SS Contributions Tax (Central Gov.t)
(trillion yen)
Which Is More, SS Contributions or Tax Revenues?FY 2003 National Budget, Japan
15
13.811.9
29.0
17.59.1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Consumption Tax Personal IncomeTax
SS PensionContributions
SS Health CareContributions
Corporate IncomeTax
(trillion yen)
Main Income Sources of Japan’s Central GovernmentFY 2003 National Budget, Japan
16
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0-14
15-19
20-24
25-29
30-34
35-39
40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59
60-64
65-69
70-74
75-79 80
+ Age
(10,000 yen)
before Redistribution after Redistribution
Source: Ministry of Health and Welfare, The 1996 Income Redistribution Survey
Per-capita Income by Age in Japan
17
O thers11%
Interestand
Dividends5%
Wagesand
Salaries6%
SSPensionBenefits
78%
median income: 3.38 million yenSource: The 1989 NSFIE (elderly couples: median income group)
SS pension benefits are the major source of retirement income
18
Drop-out from SS Pensions (Non-employees)Delinquency in Paying Pension Contributions
37.2
15
20
25
30
35
40
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 YEAR
%
19
The 2004 Reform Bill (1) The 2004 Reform Bill (1)
●● Increasing ContributionsIncreasing Contributions
by 0.354 point Every Yearby 0.354 point Every Year
→→18.30% from 2017 onwards 18.30% from 2017 onwards
by 280 yen Every Yearby 280 yen Every Year
→→16,900 yen from 2017 onwards16,900 yen from 2017 onwards
●● Increasing Subsidies Increasing Subsidies
FlatFlat--rate Basic Benefits (1/3rate Basic Benefits (1/3→→1/2)1/2)
20
The 2004 Reform Bill (2) The 2004 Reform Bill (2)
●● Reducing Benefits by Considering Reducing Benefits by Considering ““Demographic FactorsDemographic Factors”” in Indexing in Indexing Benefits between 2005 and 2023Benefits between 2005 and 2023
Replacement Rate for a Replacement Rate for a ““ModelModel”” CoupleCouple
Benefits at Age 65:Benefits at Age 65:
60% (2004) 60% (2004) →→ 50% (2023) 50% (2023)
Current Pensioners:Current Pensioners:
60% (Age 65) 60% (Age 65) →→ 43% (Age 84)43% (Age 84)
21
40
45
50
55
60
65 70 75 80 85
(Age)
(%)
born in 1939born in 1944born in 1949born in 1954born in 1959
Replacement RateReplacement Rate
22
1200
970
190
0
500
1,000
1,500(Tr Ye n)
C ontri -butions Pe nsion
Liabi l i tie s
Transfers (G R)
(as at 31st March 2005(as at 31st March 2005))
Excess AExcess A::420 Tr. Yen420 Tr. Yen
170740
150
0
500
1,000
1,500(Tr Yen)
PensionLiabilities
F.R.
Transfers (GR)
Excess LExcess L::420 Tr. Yen420 Tr. Yen
Part One (PAST)Part One (PAST) Part Two (FUTURE)Part Two (FUTURE)
KNH Balance Sheet: KNH Balance Sheet: After ReformAfter ReformIncentiveIncentive--compatible?compatible?
Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities
320
1,390
23
Future Policy OptionsFuture Policy Options
●● Strengthening IncentiveStrengthening Incentive--CompatibilityCompatibility
Shift to NDCShift to NDC
●● Handling Legacy PensionsHandling Legacy PensionsDiminishing Excess LiabilitiesDiminishing Excess Liabilities
●● Strengthening Private InitiativesStrengthening Private Initiatives
24
Strengthening IncentiveStrengthening Incentive--CompatibilityCompatibilityShift to NDCShift to NDC
●● Direct Link between Contributions Direct Link between Contributions
and Pension Benefitsand Pension Benefits
““Every Yen CountsEvery Yen Counts””
→→Increased CredibilityIncreased Credibility
25Handling Legacy PensionsHandling Legacy PensionsThree OptionsThree Options
●● Reducing BenefitsReducing Benefits
●● Increasing ContributionsIncreasing Contributions
●● Increasing SubsidiesIncreasing Subsidies
26
920970
50
0
500
1,000
1,500(Tr Yen)
C ontributionsPe nsion
Liabi l i tie s
Transfers (G R)
(as at 31st March 2005(as at 31st March 2005))
Excess AExcess A::0 Tr. Yen0 Tr. Yen
170 740
290
280
0
500
1,000
1,500
PensionLiabilities
F.R.
Transfers (GR)
Consumption Tax
(Tr Yen)
Excess LExcess L::0 Tr. Yen0 Tr. Yen
Part One (PAST)Part One (PAST) Part Two (FUTURE)Part Two (FUTURE)
KNH Balance SheetKNH Balance Sheet::Alternative ReformAlternative Reform
Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities
970
740
27Conclusions (1)Conclusions (1)Importance of the Balance SheetImportance of the Balance Sheet
●● describe the current financial situationsdescribe the current financial situations
●● imply how smoothly SS benefits are imply how smoothly SS benefits are financed in the futurefinanced in the future
●●assess impacts of alternative policy assess impacts of alternative policy measures on future financingmeasures on future financing
●●The BS will be in a huge deficit even if the The BS will be in a huge deficit even if the income statement of SS pensions enjoys income statement of SS pensions enjoys a surplusa surplus
28
Conclusions (2)Conclusions (2)
●● How to provide adequate income to older How to provide adequate income to older persons, while keeping the SS pension persons, while keeping the SS pension schemes financially sustainable?schemes financially sustainable?
Theory of Policy AssignmentTheory of Policy Assignment
Automatic Balancing MechanismAutomatic Balancing Mechanism
What Matters is the Taste of PieWhat Matters is the Taste of Pie
29
ReferencesReferences
1.1. N. N. TakayamaTakayama, , ““The Balance Sheet of Social The Balance Sheet of Social Security Pensions in Japan,Security Pensions in Japan,”” PIEPIE--DP, No.235, DP, No.235, 2004.2004.
2.2. N. Ogawa and N. N. Ogawa and N. TakayamaTakayama, , ““Demography Demography and Ageing,and Ageing,”” PIEPIE--DP, No.251, 2005.DP, No.251, 2005.
3.3. Website:Website:www.ier.hitwww.ier.hit--u.ac.jp/~takayama/indexu.ac.jp/~takayama/index--e.htmle.html
www.ier.hitwww.ier.hit--u.ac.jp/pie/English/discussionpaper/index.htmlu.ac.jp/pie/English/discussionpaper/index.html