Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

97
The adequacy of phylogenetic trait models Matthew Pennell @mwpennell

description

Talk on assessing the adequacy of phylogenetic trait models. Presented at Evolution 2014.

Transcript of Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Page 1: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

The adequacy of phylogenetic trait modelsMatthew Pennell @mwpennell

Page 2: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

In collaboration withRich FitzJohn Will Cornwell Luke Harmon

Page 3: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk
Page 4: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

R2=0.67; p=0.002 R2=0.67; p=0.002

R2=0.67; p=0.002 R2=0.67; p=0.002Anscombe 1973

Page 5: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Is the model appropriate?

If not, what are we missing?

Page 6: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Is the model appropriate?

And if not, what are we missing?

Page 7: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●● ●

For simple regression models

Coo

k’s d

istan

ce

Observation

Page 8: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

●●

For simple regression modelsRe

sidua

ls

Fitted values

● ●

Page 9: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Statistical tests of model adequacycompliment visual intuition

Page 10: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

For phylogenetic trait models

Plotting the relevant data is challenging

No general methods for assessing model adequacy

Page 11: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Especially for complex models

θ1

θ2

θ3

Page 12: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

For phylogenetic trait models

Plotting the relevant data is challenging

No general methods for assessing model adequacy

Page 13: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Our approach

Page 14: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Establishing scope

Quantitative traits

Univariate trait models

Tip states assume to ~ multivariate Gaussian

Page 15: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Fit a model to comparative data

Use "tted parameters to simulate data

Compare observed to simulated data

The general idea

Page 16: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

The general idea

Fit a model to comparative data

Use "tted parameters to simulate data

Compare observed to simulated data

Page 17: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

The general idea

Fit a model to comparative data

Use "tted parameters to simulate data

Compare observed to simulated data

Page 18: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Old statistical idea

θ

Pr(D

|θ)

θ

Pr(θ

|D)

Parametric bootstrapping

Posterior predictive simulation

Page 19: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

If we re-ran evolution, how likely are we to see a dataset like ours?

Page 20: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Simulated data similar to observedModel likely adequate

Simulated data very different from observedModel likely inadequate

Page 21: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Comparing observed to simulated data

No two datasets are exactly alike

Use test statistics to summarize data in meaningfulways

Page 22: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

No two datasets are exactly alike

Use test statistics to summarize data in meaningfulways

Comparing observed to simulated data

Page 23: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Species are not independent data points

Calculate test-statistics on contrasts

Comparing observed to simulated data

Page 24: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Species are not independent data points

Calculate test statistics on contrasts

Comparing observed to simulated data

Page 25: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Independent contrasts

A

B

C

Ci

Cj

n-1contrasts for n tips

Under BM modelC ~ Gaussian(0, σ)

Page 26: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

When model is not Brownian motion

Contrasts no longer expected to be ~ Gaussian

Rescale branch lengths of phylogeny

Page 27: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

When model is not Brownian motion

Contrasts no longer expected to be ~ Gaussian

Rescale branch lengths of phylogeny

Page 28: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

For models that predict tip states to be multivariate Gaussian

ln L = -0.5[n ln(2π) + ln|Σ| + (Y - μX)’Σ-1(Y - μX)]

Page 29: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

For models that predict tip states to be multivariate Gaussian

ln L = -0.5[n ln(2π) + ln|Σ| + (Y - μX)’Σ-1(Y - μX)]

Y is the observed tip states for the n species

μ is the mean of observed data

X is a column vector of 1

Σ is the expected variance-covariance matrixfor the tip states under the model

Page 30: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

For models that predict tip states to be multivariate Gaussian

ln L = -0.5[n ln(2π) + ln|Σ| + (Y - μX)’Σ-1(Y - μX)]

Y is the observed tip states for the n species

μ is the mean of observed data

X is a column vector of 1

Σ is the expected variance-covariance matrixfor the tip states under the model

Page 31: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

For models that predict tip states to be multivariate Gaussian

ln L = -0.5[n ln(2π) + ln|Σ| + (Y - μX)’Σ-1(Y - μX)]

Y is the observed tip states for the n species

μ is the mean of observed data

X is a column vector of 1

Σ is the expected variance-covariance matrixfor the tip states under the model

Page 32: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

For models that predict tip states to be multivariate Gaussian

ln L = -0.5[n ln(2π) + ln|Σ| + (Y - μX)’Σ-1(Y - μX)]

Y is the observed tip states for the n species

μ is the mean of observed data

X is a column vector of 1

Σ is the expected variance-covariance matrixfor the tip states under the model

Page 33: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

The Σ matrix

If we "t a Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model

Σij = σ2/2α(1-e-2αT)e-αCij

Page 34: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

The Σ matrix

If we "t a Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model

Σij = σ2/2α(1-e-2αT)e-αCij

σ2 rate of diffusion

α pull towards optimum

T tree height

Cij shared branch lengthbetween tips i and j

Page 35: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

The Σ matrix

If we "t a Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model

Σij = σ2/2α(1-e-2αT)e-αCij

σ2 rate of diffusion

α pull towards optimum

T tree height

Cij shared branch lengthbetween tips i and j

Page 36: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

The Σ matrix

If we "t a Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model

Σij = σ2/2α(1-e-2αT)e-αCij

σ2 rate of diffusion

α pull towards optimum

T tree height

Cij shared branch lengthbetween tips i and j

Page 37: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

The Σ matrix

If we "t a Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model

Σij = σ2/2α(1-e-2αT)e-αCij

σ2 rate of diffusion

α pull towards optimum

T tree height

Cij shared branch lengthbetween tips i and j

Page 38: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Building a unit tree

Rescale branch lengths by the amount of co(variance) we expect to accumulate under the model

A

B

C

vi’ = ΣAB - ΣAC

vi

Page 39: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Unit tree example

Ornstein-Uhlenbeck modelσ2 = 0.5 | α = 1

A

B

C

A

B

C

Page 40: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

The nice thing about unit trees

Transformation applies to most* models ofcontinuous trait evolution

If model is adequate, contrasts on unit tree will beI.I.D. ~ Gaussian(0, 1)

Page 41: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Also applies to PGLS-style models

Create unit tree from parameter estimates

Compute contrasts on the residuals

If model is adequate contrasts of residuals will beGaussian(0,1) - same test statistics apply

Page 42: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Can compute test statistics onunit tree contrasts to assess adequacy

Page 43: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Var(contrasts)

|Con

tras

ts|

Ancestral state Node height

Contrasts2

Den

sity

Den

sity

Contrasts XCu

mul

ativ

e Pr

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

}

|Con

tras

ts|

|Con

tras

ts|

Page 44: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

Var(contrasts)

|Con

tras

ts|

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

Ancestral state

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

Node height

Contrasts2

Den

sity

Den

sity

Contrasts XCu

mul

ativ

e Pr

}

|Con

tras

ts|

|Con

tras

ts|

Page 45: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

Var(contrasts)

|Con

tras

ts|

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

Ancestral state

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

Node height

Contrasts2

Den

sity

Den

sity

Contrasts XCu

mul

ativ

e Pr

}

|Con

tras

ts|

|Con

tras

ts|

Page 46: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

Var(contrasts)

|Con

tras

ts|

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

Ancestral state

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

Node height

Contrasts2

Den

sity

Den

sity

Contrasts XCu

mul

ativ

e Pr

}

|Con

tras

ts|

|Con

tras

ts|

Page 47: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

Var(contrasts)

|Con

tras

ts|

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

Ancestral state

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

Node height

Contrasts2

Den

sity

Den

sity

Contrasts XCu

mul

ativ

e Pr

}

|Con

tras

ts|

|Con

tras

ts|

Page 48: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

Var(contrasts)

|Con

tras

ts|

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

Ancestral state

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

Node height

Contrasts2

Den

sity

Den

sity

Contrasts XCu

mul

ativ

e Pr

}

|Con

tras

ts|

|Con

tras

ts|

Page 49: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

Var(contrasts)

|Con

tras

ts|

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

Ancestral state

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

Node height

Contrasts2

Den

sity

Den

sity

Contrasts XCu

mul

ativ

e Pr

}

|Con

tras

ts|

|Con

tras

ts|

Page 50: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Simulating new datasets

Tree has already been transformed

Simulate m new datasets under BM with σ2 = 1

Page 51: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Calculate test statistics on contrasts of simulated data

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

}●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

}

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

}

Page 52: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Compare observed test statistics todistribution of simulated test statistics

Page 53: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Putting it all together

Page 54: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Estimate θ

Page 55: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Estimate θ

Build unit tree

Page 56: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Estimate θ

Build unit tree

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

Test statisticsobs data

Page 57: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Estimate θ

Build unit tree

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

Test statisticsobs data

Simulate BM data

Page 58: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Estimate θ

Build unit tree

Test statisticsobs data

Simulate BM data

Test statisticssim data

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

Page 59: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Estimate θ

Build unit tree

Test statisticsobs data

Simulate BM data

Test statisticssim data

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

Compare sim to obstest statistics

Page 61: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

arbutus R package

Designed to interact with other R packages

Object-oriented

New models and test statistics can easily be added

Page 62: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

arbutus R package

library(diversitree)lik <- make.bm(phy, data)div.fit <- find.mle(lik, x.init=1)

arbutus(div.fit)

library(geiger)g.fit <- fitContinuous(phy, data, model = “BM”)

arbutus(g.fit)

Page 63: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

E.g.: seed mass evolution in Fagaceae

Page 64: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model

}

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

Page 65: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model

}

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

Page 66: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Are common trait models adequatefor real comparative data?

Page 67: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Analysis of 337 comparative datasets

Brownian motion

ree important plant functional traits

72 datasets (20-2,200 spp.) for speci"c leaf area

226 datasets (20-22,817 spp.) for seed mass

39 datasets (20-936 spp.) for leaf nitrogen

Wright et al. 2004Kleyer et al. 2008

Kew SID 2014

Page 68: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Brownian motionZanne et al. 2014

Page 69: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

For each dataset

Fit three simple models of trait evolution (Brownian Motion, Ornstein-Uhlenbeck, Early Burst)

Compared model "t using AIC

Assessed the adequacy of the best-supported model

Page 70: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Model comparison using AIC

Datasets (1-337)

AIC

w

Brownian motion

Brownian motion Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Early Burst

Page 71: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Here’s the dark side

Page 72: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Best model rejected (p>0.05) - ML

72/72 speci"c leaf area datasets

185/226 seed mass datasets

39/39 leaf nitrogen datasets

Page 73: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

p-values -- REML est. of σ2

p-value0 0.80

Den

sity

Speci"c leaf area Seed mass Leaf nitrogen

Page 74: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Models get worse as trees get bigger

Log(Tree Size)20 11,000

Dist

(sim

, obs

)

Speci"c leaf area Seed mass Leaf nitrogen

Page 75: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Simple, commonly used modelsare often woefully inadequate

Page 76: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

But...we already knew that

Page 77: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

We are (often) here

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

Page 78: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

This is how we learn about biology!

Page 79: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Learn about issues with the data

Page 80: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Common issues with data

Phylogenetic error (topology & branch lengths)

Measurement error

Biologically interesting ‘outlier’ species

Page 81: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Learn about evolutionary processes

●●

Page 82: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Many ways to add complexity

Time heterogeneous models

Different models for different parts of the tree

Biologically motivated models

Page 83: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Test statistics can help us make informed decisions

May suggest types of models that have not even beendeveloped yet

Page 84: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Does it matter if a model is inadequate?

Page 85: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

It depends on the question...

}

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

What is the rate of seed mass evolution?

Single optimum OU model is very misleading

Page 86: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

It depends on the question...

What is the rate of seed mass evolution?

Single optimum OU model is very misleading

}

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

Page 87: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

It depends on the question...

Was there an “early burst” in seed mass evolution?

Inadequate OU model likely doesn’t affect inference

}

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

Page 88: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

It depends on the question...

Was there an “early burst” in seed mass evolution?

Inadequate OU model likely doesn’t affect inference

}

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

Page 89: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Model adequacy is not binary

Whether the model is “good enough” depends on what questions you are asking

Page 90: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Some concluding thoughts

Page 91: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Understanding how a model fails can provide interesting biological insights

Page 92: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Pay attention to parameter estimates

Look carefully at the data

Plot the test statistics

Keep the question in mind

Page 93: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Pay attention to parameter estimates

Look carefully at the data

Plot the test statistics

Keep the question in mind

Page 94: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Pay attention to parameter estimates

Look carefully at the data

Plot the test statistics

Keep the question in mind

Page 95: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Pay attention to parameter estimates

Look carefully at the data

Plot the test statistics

Keep the question in mind

Page 96: Pennell-Evolution-2014-talk

Advice and encouragementJosef UyedaDaniel CaetanoPaul JoyceGraham Slater

Amy ZanneRoxana HickeyAnahi EspindolaSimon Uribe-Convers

FundingNSFNSERC

NESCentUniversity of Idaho

NESCent Tempo & mode working group