PENALTY Chapter 5. PENALTY CONTINGENCY The immediate, response-contingent REMOVAL of a REINFORCER...

33
PENALTY Chapter 5

Transcript of PENALTY Chapter 5. PENALTY CONTINGENCY The immediate, response-contingent REMOVAL of a REINFORCER...

Page 1: PENALTY Chapter 5. PENALTY CONTINGENCY The immediate, response-contingent REMOVAL of a REINFORCER resulting in a decreased frequency of that response.

PENALTY

Chapter 5

Page 2: PENALTY Chapter 5. PENALTY CONTINGENCY The immediate, response-contingent REMOVAL of a REINFORCER resulting in a decreased frequency of that response.

PENALTY CONTINGENCY

• The immediate, response-contingent REMOVAL of a REINFORCER resulting in a decreased frequency of that response

BEFORE BEHAVIOR AFTER

Page 4: PENALTY Chapter 5. PENALTY CONTINGENCY The immediate, response-contingent REMOVAL of a REINFORCER resulting in a decreased frequency of that response.

Graph

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

None Traditional Penalty

Threats

Threats

Interventions

Page 5: PENALTY Chapter 5. PENALTY CONTINGENCY The immediate, response-contingent REMOVAL of a REINFORCER resulting in a decreased frequency of that response.

Penalty Principle

• A response becomes less frequent if loss of a reinforcer or a decrease in a reinforcer has immediately followed it in the past.

Page 6: PENALTY Chapter 5. PENALTY CONTINGENCY The immediate, response-contingent REMOVAL of a REINFORCER resulting in a decreased frequency of that response.

Punishment, penalty, or escape?

Before Behavior After

Ed has painful rock in shoe

Ed shakes rock out of shoe

Ed has no painful rock

Jo has no dust in eyes

Jo blows on dusty surface

Jo has painful dust in eyes

Bill has $2 Bill jumps on furniture

Bill loses $1

Page 7: PENALTY Chapter 5. PENALTY CONTINGENCY The immediate, response-contingent REMOVAL of a REINFORCER resulting in a decreased frequency of that response.

What contingency?

Before Behavior After

Shock Lever press No shock

No shock Lever press Shock

Food pellets Lever press No food pellets

Page 8: PENALTY Chapter 5. PENALTY CONTINGENCY The immediate, response-contingent REMOVAL of a REINFORCER resulting in a decreased frequency of that response.

Contingency Table

Stimulus, event, or condition Present Remove

Reinforcer Reinforcement Penalty

Aversive Condition

Punishment Escape

Page 9: PENALTY Chapter 5. PENALTY CONTINGENCY The immediate, response-contingent REMOVAL of a REINFORCER resulting in a decreased frequency of that response.

Specific Penalty Contingencies

• Response cost

• Time out from positive reinforcement

Page 10: PENALTY Chapter 5. PENALTY CONTINGENCY The immediate, response-contingent REMOVAL of a REINFORCER resulting in a decreased frequency of that response.

Response-Cost Contingency

• The immediate response-contingent removal of a tangible reinforcer resulting in a decreased frequency of the response

Page 11: PENALTY Chapter 5. PENALTY CONTINGENCY The immediate, response-contingent REMOVAL of a REINFORCER resulting in a decreased frequency of that response.

Response Cost

Behavior:

Sam bounces a basketball off of mother’s head

Before:

Sam has new basketball

After:

Sam no longer has new basketball

Page 12: PENALTY Chapter 5. PENALTY CONTINGENCY The immediate, response-contingent REMOVAL of a REINFORCER resulting in a decreased frequency of that response.

Time-out ContingencyThe immediate response-contingent removal of

access to a reinforcer resulting in a decreased frequency of that response.

Diagram this contingency. What do you need to know?

Page 13: PENALTY Chapter 5. PENALTY CONTINGENCY The immediate, response-contingent REMOVAL of a REINFORCER resulting in a decreased frequency of that response.

Need to Know?

• The target behavior (response)– YELLING OUT

Page 14: PENALTY Chapter 5. PENALTY CONTINGENCY The immediate, response-contingent REMOVAL of a REINFORCER resulting in a decreased frequency of that response.

Time Out

Behavior:

Frank yells out

Before:

Frank has access to attention/toys

After:

Frank has no access to attention/toys for 3 minutes

Page 15: PENALTY Chapter 5. PENALTY CONTINGENCY The immediate, response-contingent REMOVAL of a REINFORCER resulting in a decreased frequency of that response.

Response Cost vs. Time-Out

• Response Cost– Removal of the

reinforcers themselves

– Loss of earned reinforcers

– Lost forever

– tangibles

• Time-Out– Removal of access to

reinforcers

– Loss of opportunity to earn reinforcers

– Lost temporarily

– Activities

Page 16: PENALTY Chapter 5. PENALTY CONTINGENCY The immediate, response-contingent REMOVAL of a REINFORCER resulting in a decreased frequency of that response.

Time-Out

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Baseline Reinforcement Time-Out

Yelling Out

Intervention

% of time

Page 17: PENALTY Chapter 5. PENALTY CONTINGENCY The immediate, response-contingent REMOVAL of a REINFORCER resulting in a decreased frequency of that response.

Law of Effect

• The effects of our actions determine whether we will repeat them.

results

Page 18: PENALTY Chapter 5. PENALTY CONTINGENCY The immediate, response-contingent REMOVAL of a REINFORCER resulting in a decreased frequency of that response.

E. L. Thorndike

Page 19: PENALTY Chapter 5. PENALTY CONTINGENCY The immediate, response-contingent REMOVAL of a REINFORCER resulting in a decreased frequency of that response.

Cats in a puzzle box

• Responses made just prior to “pleasant events” are more likely to be repeated, while responses made just prior to “unpleasant” events are more likely to diminish.

Page 20: PENALTY Chapter 5. PENALTY CONTINGENCY The immediate, response-contingent REMOVAL of a REINFORCER resulting in a decreased frequency of that response.

Pleasant events

• Satisfiers

Page 21: PENALTY Chapter 5. PENALTY CONTINGENCY The immediate, response-contingent REMOVAL of a REINFORCER resulting in a decreased frequency of that response.

Unpleasant events

• Annoyers

Page 22: PENALTY Chapter 5. PENALTY CONTINGENCY The immediate, response-contingent REMOVAL of a REINFORCER resulting in a decreased frequency of that response.

Rolling Over the Dead Man

• Not being tardy

• Not eating junk food

• Not speeding

Page 23: PENALTY Chapter 5. PENALTY CONTINGENCY The immediate, response-contingent REMOVAL of a REINFORCER resulting in a decreased frequency of that response.

Basic Behavioral Contingencies

R e in fo rce m e nt E sca pe

R e in fo rce m e ntF req u en cy In cre ases

P u n ish m e nt

R e spo n se C o st T im e -O ut

P en a lty

P u n ish m e ntF re qu en cy D ec re ases

B a sic B eh av io ra l C on tin ge n cies

Page 24: PENALTY Chapter 5. PENALTY CONTINGENCY The immediate, response-contingent REMOVAL of a REINFORCER resulting in a decreased frequency of that response.

Penalty & Reinforcement

Before:

Sam has no attention

Before:

Sam can play with toys

After:

Sam has attentionBehavior:

Sam bounces ball off his mother’s head

Inappropriate Natural Reinforcement Contingency

Performance-Management Penalty Contingency

After:

Sam can’t play with the toys

Page 25: PENALTY Chapter 5. PENALTY CONTINGENCY The immediate, response-contingent REMOVAL of a REINFORCER resulting in a decreased frequency of that response.

Review

• Contingency Table

Page 26: PENALTY Chapter 5. PENALTY CONTINGENCY The immediate, response-contingent REMOVAL of a REINFORCER resulting in a decreased frequency of that response.

Contingency Table

Remove

Page 27: PENALTY Chapter 5. PENALTY CONTINGENCY The immediate, response-contingent REMOVAL of a REINFORCER resulting in a decreased frequency of that response.

Contingency Table

Stimulus, Event, or Condition

Remove

Page 28: PENALTY Chapter 5. PENALTY CONTINGENCY The immediate, response-contingent REMOVAL of a REINFORCER resulting in a decreased frequency of that response.

Contingency Table

Stimulus, Event, or Condition

Remove

Page 29: PENALTY Chapter 5. PENALTY CONTINGENCY The immediate, response-contingent REMOVAL of a REINFORCER resulting in a decreased frequency of that response.

Contingency Table

Stimulus, event, or condition Reinforcer Aversive

condition

Remove Penalty Escape

Present Reinforcement Punishment

Page 30: PENALTY Chapter 5. PENALTY CONTINGENCY The immediate, response-contingent REMOVAL of a REINFORCER resulting in a decreased frequency of that response.

Contingency Table

Stimulus, event, or condition Present Remove

Reinforcer Reinforcement Penalty

Aversive Condition

Punishment Escape

Page 31: PENALTY Chapter 5. PENALTY CONTINGENCY The immediate, response-contingent REMOVAL of a REINFORCER resulting in a decreased frequency of that response.

Reversal Designs

An experimental design in which we reverse between intervention and baseline conditions to assess the effects of those conditions.

Page 32: PENALTY Chapter 5. PENALTY CONTINGENCY The immediate, response-contingent REMOVAL of a REINFORCER resulting in a decreased frequency of that response.

Definition of ABA Design

An experimental design in which the intervention and baseline conditions are reversed to assess the effects of those conditions

0

20

40

60

80

100

days

nu

mb

er

of tim

es A B A

Page 33: PENALTY Chapter 5. PENALTY CONTINGENCY The immediate, response-contingent REMOVAL of a REINFORCER resulting in a decreased frequency of that response.

Before Behavior After

Ed has painful rock in shoe

Ed shakes rock out of shoe

Ed has no painful rock

Jo has no dust in eyes

Jo blows on dusty surface

Jo has painful dust in eyes

Bill has $2 Bill jumps on furniture

Bill loses $1