Peer Project Learning
Transcript of Peer Project Learning
Florencio R. Pinela Harvard University: Visi0ng Scholar Professor at ESPOL Educa0on: Florida Ins0tute of Technology & ESPOL
Youngjin Seo Harvard University: Postdoctoral Fellow Educa0on: Seoul Na0onal University
Started by Judith A. Ramaley, STEM is designed to
revoluAonize the teaching of subject areas such as
MathemaAcs and Science by incorporaAng Technology
and Engineering into regular curriculum.
Goals for U.S. STEM Educa0on • GOAL 1: Expand the number of students who ul0mately pursue advanced degrees and careers in STEM fields and broaden the par0cipa0on of women and minori0es in those fields.
• GOAL 2: Expand the STEM-‐capable workforce and broaden the par0cipa0on of women and minori0es in that workforce.
• GOAL 3: Increase STEM literacy for all students, including those who do not pursue STEM-‐related careers or addi0onal study in the STEM disciplines.
Na0onal Research Council (2011), Successful K-‐12 STEM Educa0on.
v The instructor’s primary role shiEs from delivering informa0on to managing a complete set of instruc0ons and process.
v The students’ role shiEs from being passive recipients of informa0on to one of accep0ng responsibility for the ini0al exposure to the course content so that they will be prepared for the in-‐class teamwork.
Michaelsen, L., Sweet, M. & Parmalee, D. (2008), The essen0al elements of Team-‐Based Learning.
“Students should be prepared .….
q To pass the Test q To Know q To Create
Eric Mazur’s AP50 introduc0on, h^p://bit.ly/AP50firstclass (Chrome only)
Teachers have developed and used various approaches of teaching that fit the criteria for student-centered learning. Many of these developers have created original names for their approaches. There is a broad spectrum of named approaches, which include • Active Learning (Bonwell & Eison, 1991) • Collaborative Learning (Bruffee, 1984) • Inquiry-based Learning • Cooperative Learning (Johnson, Johnson, & Smith, 1991) • Problem-based Learning • Peer Led Team Learning (Tien, Roth, & Kampmeier, 2001) • Team-based Learning (Michaelson, Knight, & Fink, 2004) • Peer Instruction (Mazur, 1997) • Inquiry Guided Learning • Just-in-Time Teaching • Small Group Learning • Project-based Learning • Question-directed Instruction
Peer Project Learning
Peer Instruc0on
Team-‐Based
Learning
Project-‐Based
Learning
Peer Assessment
Peer Project Learning
Peer Learning (Classroom Ac0vity)
Project Learning (Laboratory Ac0vity)
Pre-‐Reading (textbook, ar0cle, video, anima0on etc.)
The class starts with a short quiz. (The quiz must be graded)
Lecture (Brief Presenta0on)
First Round Ques0ons
(Student poll 1)
Second Round Ques0ons
(Student poll 2)
Eric Mazur
A set of problems is given to the students to be
solved individually.
The students in a team share, explain, and discuss their answers to submit a final team
report.
The team report must include
explana0ons as well as answers, which will be reviewed by instructor.
The ECQ is an individual quiz with essay form, and must be relevant to the
Conceptual Problems.
The goal of ECQ is to ensure that students par0cipate in the lecture with responsibility.
The ECQ should deal with the basic and core concepts in the course, and not exceed 30
minutes.
GroupEng, h^ps://www.groupeng.org/
AP50 Harvard University
• The project in TBL is a teamwork ac0vity in which students have a chance of gaining knowledge and skills by applying concepts, laws and principles covered by lectures.
• Through the project, students can learn both conceptual and procedural knowledge.
1. The project consists of open-‐ended problems, which are intriguing and
challenging to students. 2. The project covers contents in the lecture for students to apply concepts
and skills. 3. Through the project, students reinforce the competencies especially
valuable nowadays such as problem solving, cri0cal thinking, collabora0on, communica0on and crea0vity.
4. The project allows students to make decisions about how they manage their 0me efficiently and concretely to meet each dead line.
5. The project includes reflec0ve processes like peer and team assessment to give feedback on the quality of their work just in 0me.
6. Students have an opportunity to present and share their outcomes to other people outside as well as their classmates and instructor.
KrisAn Sainani, professor at Stanford University said in science, research is a king, and it's
important, but over the past decade universiAes have started to pay more aSenAon to the “soE
wriAng skills" that scienAsts also need.
The TradiAonal Lab Report The tradiAonal lab report is known to create several pedagogical shortcomings in the introductory physics course, parAcularly with regard to promoAng students’
engagement and encouraging quality wriAng.
The “LeSer” Project Reports In PPL, we propose the use of a “LeSer Project Report” as an alternaAve to a
tradiAonal lab report in order to create a more authenAc wriAng experience.
Lane, W. B. (2014), Le^ers home as an alterna0ve to lab reports. The Physics Teacher, 52, 397-‐399.
1. Each team selects a real person, recipient, to address the final project report, but the recipient should not be an expert in science.
2. The recipient must be able to learn some scien0fic knowledge from the final project report.
3. A team writes the final project report in the tone of a le^er, considering both the correctness of informa0on and the clarity of expression.
4. The final project report includes the setup of project in sufficient detail, the scien0fic laws and formulas used, and the results and discussions obtained.
5. The descrip0on of project should be clear and precise enough so that other students in the course can easily repeat the whole process of project.
PROJECT FINAL GRADE
PEER ASSESSMENT
REPORT
REPORT PRESENTATION
Final Grade
Project Grade/Peer assessment
(30%)
End chapter Quiz (30%)
Final Accumula0ve Test (30%)
Pre-‐Reading Quiz (10%)