Peer-delivered HIV testing and counseling among people who inject drugs in Bangkok, Thailand
description
Transcript of Peer-delivered HIV testing and counseling among people who inject drugs in Bangkok, Thailand
Page 1
Peer-delivered HIV testing and counseling among people who inject
drugs in Bangkok, ThailandLianping Ti 1
Kanna Hayashi 1,2
Karyn Kaplan 3
Paisan Suwannawong 3
Evan Wood 1,4
Julio Montaner 1,4
Thomas Kerr 1,4
1British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, St. Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada2Interdisciplinary Graduate Studies Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada3Thai AIDS Treatment Action Group, Bangkok, Thailand4Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Page 2
HIV EPIDEMIC IN THAILAND
0
10
20
30
40
50
60Thailand HIV Prevalence by Risk Group (Median Values), 1989-2011
Injection Drug Users
Direct female commercial sex workers
Indirect female com-mercial sex workers
Male clients at STI clinics
Blood donors
Pregnant women at an-tenatal care clinics
Perc
ent (
%)
Source: MOPH Thailand
Page 3
HIV TESTING• Reduce HIV-related
morbidity and mortality
• May minimize high-risk behaviour
• Provide linkages to HIV treatment and care services
Wood et al. (2006). Impact of HIV testing on uptake of HIV therapy among antiretroviral naïve HIV-infected injection drug users. Drug and Alcohol Review, 25, 451-454.
Page 4
BARRIERS TO HIV TESTING IN THAILAND• Uptake of HIV testing <20% among IDU in Asia-Pacific
• 2003 “War on Drugs” campaign
• Fear of HIV-positive test result
• Stigma and discrimination
• Breaches of patient confidentiality
Page 5
OBJECTIVES• Seek – Test – Treat - Retain
• Explore acceptability of novel methods of testing and counselling (VCT)
Page 6
MITSAMPAN COMMUNITY RESEARCH PROJECT• A collaborative research effort involving:
• Peer researchers involved in all stages of the project• Former/active drug users trained as peer researchers
Interviewers Outreach workers
• Three completed cycles to date (2008, 2009, 2011)
Page 7
MITSAMPAN HARM REDUCTION CENTER (MSHRC)
Photo by Rico Gustav
Page 8
METHODS• Recruited IDU through peer outreach and word-of-mouth
• Completed interviewer-administered questionnaire
• Eligibility criteria: Injection drug use in the previous six months Reside in Bangkok or adjacent provinces Informed consent
• Data collected in 2011• Restricted sample to HIV-negative IDU or IDU of unknown
HIV serostatus
Page 9
RESULTS
Yes44%
No56%
Willingness to receive peer-delivered pre-test
counsellingMSCRP 2011 Cohort
(n=350)
Yes38%
No62%
Willingness to receive peer-delivered rapid
HIV testingMSCRP 2011 Cohort
(n=350)
Yes36%
No64%
Willingness to receive peer-delivered post-
test counsellingMSCRP 2011 Cohort
(n=350)
Page 10
RESULTSWillingness to receive peer-delivered pre-test counselling
Multivariate associations
AOR (95%CI)
Binge use* 2.39 (1.46 – 3.95)
Higher than secondary level education
1.98(1.25 – 3.16)
Male gender 0.52 (0.29 – 0.90)
Willingness to receive peer-delivered rapid HIV testing
Multivariate associations
AOR (95%CI)
Binge use* 2.23 (1.36 – 3.70)
Higher than secondary level education
2.06 (1.27 – 3.39)
Ever incarcerated
2.68(1.56 – 4.72)
Avoid HIV tests 0.24(0.10 – 0.52)
Ever been to MSHRC
1.63(1.02 – 2.62)
Willingness to receive peer-delivered post-test counselling
Multivariate associations
AOR (95%CI)
Binge use* 2.40 (1.48 – 3.93)
Ever incarcerated 1.94 (1.16 – 3.33)
Avoid HIV tests 0.23(0.09 – 0.52)
AOR: adjusted odds ratio, CI: confidence interval, MSHRC: Mitsampan Harm Reduction Center*Activities in the previous six months
Page 11
RESULTSWillingness to receive peer-delivered pre-test counselling
Multivariate associations
AOR (95%CI)
Binge use* 2.39 (1.46 – 3.95)
Higher than secondary level education
1.98(1.25 – 3.16)
Male gender 0.52 (0.29 – 0.90)
Willingness to receive peer-delivered rapid HIV testing
Multivariate associations
AOR (95%CI)
Binge use* 2.23 (1.36 – 3.70)
Higher than secondary level education
2.06 (1.27 – 3.39)
Ever incarcerated
2.68(1.56 – 4.72)
Avoid HIV tests 0.24(0.10 – 0.52)
Ever been to MSHRC
1.63(1.02 – 2.62)
Willingness to receive peer-delivered post-test counselling
Multivariate associations
AOR (95%CI)
Binge use* 2.40 (1.48 – 3.93)
Ever incarcerated 1.94 (1.16 – 3.33)
Avoid HIV tests 0.23(0.09 – 0.52)
AOR: adjusted odds ratio, CI: confidence interval, MSHRC: Mitsampan Harm Reduction Center*Activities in the previous six months
Page 12
DISCUSSION• Substantial proportion willing to get peer-delivered VCT
at a drug user-run drop-in centre
• Peer-delivered VCT could reach key groups who may be missed through traditional public health methods IDU who were previously incarcerated IDU engaged in high intensity drug use
• Need for HIV prevention education efforts for IDU Increase awareness of HIV risks and transmission Target IDU with lower education and those who avoid HIV tests
Page 13
CONCLUSION• Current HIV testing approaches in Thailand are
limited• Need for ongoing HIV prevention education efforts• Potential of novel approaches to VCT for IDU
Photo by BC-CfE
Page 14
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS• MSCRP participants
• MSHRC, TTAG, & O-Zone House staff and volunteers
• Chulalongkorn University: Dr. Niyada Kitaying-Angsulee
• BC-CfE staff: Tricia Collingham, Deborah Graham, Caitlin Johnston, Calvin Lai, Peter Vann
• MSCRP staff: Prempreeda Pramoj Na Ayutthaya, Arphatsaporn Chaimongkon, Sattara Hattirat
Page 15