Pedo Record Final
description
Transcript of Pedo Record Final
K.S.R. INSTITUTE OF DENTAL SCIENCE & RESEARCH
This is to certify that this is the bonafide record of the work done by Dr. Thiruvenkadam G in the Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, K.S.R. Institute of Dental Science & Research during his post graduation from 2011-2014.
Date:
Signature of the HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT
Library DissertationTopicCognitive and emotional changes : From infancy through adolescence
DateSignature
Selection of Topic:
First copy for correction:
Corrected on:
Second copy for correction:
Correction on:
Submission:
DissertationTopicDateSignature
Approval of Topic:
Article Collection:
Discussion on Materials & Methods:
Pilot Study:
Study Completed on:
DateSignature
Title:
Introduction:
Aim &Objectives:
Review of Literature:
Materials :
Result :
Discussion & Conclusion:
Submission of Dissertation:
Continuous Evaluation of Dissertation Work Done By Guide / CoGuideDate:Name of the Faculty / Observer: S.NoPoints to be consideredPoor0Below Average1Average2Good3Very Good4
1.Periodic consultation with guide / co - guide
2.Regular collection of case material
3.Depth in analysis / Discussion
Total score
Evaluation of Seminar PresentationTopic:Date:Name of the Faculty/Observer:S.NoItems for observation during presentationPoor0Below Average1Average2Good3Very Good4
1.Whether other relevant publication consulted
2.Whether cross references have been consulted
3.Completeness of preparation
4.Clarity of presentation
5.Understanding of Subject
6.Ability to answer question
7.Time scheduling
8.Audio visual aids used
9.Overall performance
10Any other observation
Total score
Evaluation of Journal Review PresentationTopic:Date:Name of the Faculty/Observer: S.NoItems for observation during presentationPoor0Below Average1Average2Good3Very Good4
1.Article chosen
2.Extent of understanding of scope and objectives of the paper by the candidate
3.Whether cross references have been consulted
4.Whether other relevant publication
5.Ability to respond to questions on the paper / subject
6.Audio visual aids used
7.Ability of defend the paper
8.Clarity of presentation
9.Any other observation
Total Score
Evaluation of Teaching SkillDate:Name of Faculty / Observer:S.NoItems for observation StrongPointWeakPoint
1Communication of purpose of the talk
2Evokes audience interest in the subject
3The introduction
4The sequence of ideas
5The use of practical examples and / or illustrations
6Speaking style
7Attempts audience participation
8Summary of main points at the end
9Asks questions
10Answers questions asked by audience
11Rapport of speaker with his audience
12Effectiveness of the talk
13Uses AV aids appropriately
Evaluation from the clinical case presentation
Name of the trainee:Name of Faculty / Observer:S.NoItems for observation during presentationPoor0Below Average1Average2Good3Very Good4
1.Completeness of history
2.Whether all relevant points elicited
3.Clarity of presentation
4.Logical order
5.Mentioned all positive and negative
6.Accuracy of general physical examination
7.Diagnosis: whether it follows logically from history and findings
8.Investigations required
Complete list
Relevant order
Interpretation of investigations
9.Ability to react to questioning whether it follows logically from history to finding
10.Ability of defend diagnosis
11.Ability to justify differential diagnosis
Grand Total
Dental Health Camps
NoDateName of School / AreaSignature
Conference / Workshops
NoDateConferences / Workshops Attended
Paper / Poster Presentation
NoDateTitle of paper/poster presented
Publication NoTitle and Journal DetailsSignature
Leave Particulars
NoDateNo of DaysSignature