PDF (1178 K)
-
Upload
truongduong -
Category
Documents
-
view
255 -
download
4
Transcript of PDF (1178 K)
A study of stress concentration effect around
penetrations on curved shell and failure modes for
deep-diving submersible vehicle
Ching-Yu Hsua,*, Cho-Chung Liangb, Sheau-Wen Shiahc,Chan-Yung Jend
aDepartment of Marine Mechanical Engineering, Chinese Naval Academy, 669 Chun Hsiao Road,
Tsoying, Kaohsiung 813 Taiwan, R.O.C.bDepartment of Mechanical and Automation Engineering, Da-Yeh University, 112. Shan-Jiau Road,
Da-Tsuen, Changhua 515, Taiwan, R.O.C.cDepartment of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, University of National Defense Chung Cheng
Institute of Technology, Ta-Shi, Tao-Yuan 335, Taiwan, R.O.C.dInstitute of System Engineering, University of National Defense Chung Cheng Institute of Technology,
Ta-Shi, Tao-Yuan 335, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Received 5 December 2003; accepted 12 March 2004
Available online 18 January 2005
Abstract
For deep-diving submersibles, penetrations in the pressure hull induced by discontinuities in the
shell can generate stress concentration effects that represent one of the most interesting and
challenging areas of structural design. However, only the slightest trace of rational theory, collateral
test results or application techniques have been reported in open literature. Therefore, in this paper,
an opened shallow cylindrical shell and deep-diving submersible vehicle GUPPY is adopted to
investigate. In this study, the finite element procedure based on the Hibbitt and Karlsson’s
methodology is used to analyze the curvature effects and failure modes influence on stress
concentrations around opening. These results can hopefully provide valuable insight for the future
the designer of all underwater vehicles.
q 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Stress concentrations; Curvature effects; Penetrations; Deep-diving submersible vehicle
Ocean Engineering 32 (2005) 1098–1121
www.elsevier.com/locate/oceaneng
0029-8018/$ - see front matter q 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2004.05.011
* Corresponding author. Tel.: C886 7 5834700x1702; fax: C886 7 5834861.
E-mail address: [email protected] (C.-Y. Hsu).
C.-Y. Hsu et al. / Ocean Engineering 32 (2005) 1098–1121 1099
1. Introduction
Penetrations are necessary either for access or for the passage of piping, ventilation
ducts, uptakes, and electrical systems. A hole can be found in a missile skin, aircraft
fuselage, a ship hatch, boilers and submersible pressure hulls, amongst other numerous
situations. For instance, a modern submarine has more than 300–400 openings in its
pressure hull.
On the deep-diving submersible vehicles penetrations are also discovered. During the
past three decades a number of deep-diving submersible vehicles (DSV) has been
developed for many diverse fields, e.g. the oil industry, scientific deepwater marine
research, underwater cable and piping laying, deep ocean mining, as well as submarine
rescues. In most cases, deep-diving submersible vehicles must dive to a depth of 1000–
4000 m. Most of DSV pressure hulls are single or multiple sphere configurations for
external hydrostatic pressure loading. Some of the most used forms of pressure hulls are
shown in Fig. 1 (Allmendinger, 1990; Jackson, 1992; Watson, 1971; Gorman and Louie,
1991).
Penetrations are a major design consideration. For deep-diving submersibles, major
penetrations are limited to access hatches and viewports. There are local stress variations
around the penetrations that affect the design’s depth limitations, as well as the cyclic life
Fig. 1. The deep-diving submersible vehicle (Allmendinger, 1990; Jackson, 1992; Watson, 1971; Gorman, 1991).
C.-Y. Hsu et al. / Ocean Engineering 32 (2005) 1098–11211100
of the pressure vessel. Small penetrations affect only local stresses, but large penetrations
could affect the design’s collapse depth. Hence, the problem of stress concentrations
around holes in the shell is very important and cannot be neglected by a study in deep-
diving submersible vehicle.
While the structure designer proceeds with stress analysis for the opened shell, the
holes in the shell are neglected to simplify the problem. For instance, the submersible
pressure hull that is fabricated with great axisymmetric precision is subsequently
punctured randomly. The designer used the ideal structure model to calculate the
structure’s strength. Thus, the analysis results could not reflect the actual situation.
Stress concentration around holes in shells is a relevant issue at the design stage.
Therefore, precisely analyzing the stress distributed around the holes of the shell is crucial
for the shell structure design. The stress around the holes on flat plates has received
extensive interest (Patel et al., 1969; Abdul-Mihsein et al., 1979; Mangalgiri, 1984;
Pinchas and Jacob, 1985; Gao, 1996). Those investigations focus primarily on the plate
loaded for in-plane force, internal pressure and other conditions. Nevertheless, stress
around the hole on the curved shell has seldom been mentioned. Table 1 summarizes more
significant investigrations.
For a military submarine, the most appropriate pressure hull consists of a cylinder, cone
and dom shell. However, for deep-diving research spherical pressure hulls, which can bear
a high hydrostatic pressure, are frequently preferred. McKee (1959) thoroughly described
the displacement, weight, external shape and structure of US and German submarines used
in World War II. According to that investigation, the spherical pressure hull offers a better
strength/weight ratio than a cylinder and cone. Garland (1968) described the design
requirement and fabrication procedures used to construct the pressure hull of a deep
submergence vehicle (DSV). Watson (1971) presented the design, construction and
operational experiences of the deep-diving submersible vehicle GUPPY. According to his
result, the structural failure attributed to buckling of a shell may occur at nominal stress
levels far below the yield strength of the material. Gifford and Jones (1971) discussed the
feasibility of applying FEM (Finite Element Method) to analyze current and future deep
submersible vehicles. That investigation also examined the structural response of the
dicontinuous member of a deep submergence pressure hull, e.g. plug hatches, juncture
rings and viewport. Winker and Nordseewerke (1983) reviewed the design trends of
conventional submarines, including extension of the submerged cruising range between
two snorkelling periods, reduction of noise radiation, and introduction of an improved
rescue system. Faulker (1983) studied the underlying structural mechanics and design
philosophy with simple strength formulations deemed appropriate for manual calcu-
lations. Gorman and Louie (1991) assessed the merits of advanced hull shapes,
architectures and materials via a novel methodology. In 1993, in addition to reviewing
manned and unmanned submersible vehicles systems, Garzke et al. (1993) highlighted the
importance of the systems in the exploration of ocean bottom geology and underwater
wrecks, e.g. the Titanic and Bismarck. Those contented that developing deep-diving
manned and unmanned submersibles could lead to new architectural fields. Liang et al.
(1997) proposed a minimum weight design of a submarine pressure hull under hydrostatic
pressure with constraints on factors, e.g. general instability, buckling of shell between
frames, plate yielding and frame yielding. Liang et al. (1998) investigated the non-linear
Table 1
The synopsis of the study for the hole in the shell
Author Synopsis Notes
Bonde and Rao
(1980)
Model: two equal circular elastic inclusions in a pressurized
cylindrical shell
Loading: pressure loading
Method: analytical method
Result: the interaction between the two inclusions is more
pronounced at qZ08 than at any other angle. Maximum
shell stress increases as the inclusions come closer. The
effect of inter-inclusion distance on bending stresses is more
pronounced than on membrane stresses
Bull (1982) Model: cylindrical shell with large circular cut-out
Loading: axial compression, torsion and three point bending
Method: experimental and finite element analysis
Result: stress concentration factors around the hole are
obtained from the experimental and finite element analysis
Deans (1990) Model: ring-reinforced shell with opening
Loading: end loading, external pressure
Method: finite element method
Result: a series of tables of the stress concentration factors
(SCF) in areas adjacent to the opening are obtained and,
using these SCF, modeling rules for utilization of part
models are developed
Dyke (1965) Model: an infinite thin shallow cylindrical shell
Loading: axial tension, internal pressure, and torsion
Method: analytic method
Result: three ranges of curvature parameter are defined by
the dimensionless parameter b
Foo (1992) Model: cylindrical shells with a single cutout
Loading: tensile and torsion loading
Method: non-linear mathematical programming techniques
Result: approximate lower bounds to the limit load and
torque of cylindrical shells with a single cutout is obtained
Hooke and
Demunshi
(1977)
Model: two cylindrical holes intersecting at right angles in
an infinite homogenous, isotropic, elastic body
Loading: uniform tension at an infinite distance from holes
Method: the point matching or boundary value least
squares’ technique
Result: the effect of the intersection on stress distribution is
very much localized in nature and decreases rapidly as the
point is moved away from the intersection along each of
holes. When the load is perpendicular to both holes, the stress
concentration factor has been found to be increased by
decreasing the ratio of the hole radii from 5.43 for equal sized
holes to 7.28 with one hole much larger than the other. Where
the holes are under hydrostatic pressure the stress concen-
tration factor varies from 2.99 with equal sized holes to 3.53
with one hole much larger than the other
(continued on next page)
C.-Y. Hsu et al. / Ocean Engineering 32 (2005) 1098–1121 1101
Table 1 (continued)
Author Synopsis Notes
Huang (1972) Model: an infinite elastic–plastic plate with a circular hole
or inclusions
Loading: pure tension and shear at infinity
Method: semianalytical method based on fourier series and
finite difference
Result: the validity of Neuber’s relationship between stress
and strain concentration factors for the plane stress
problems is examined and a generalized Stowell formula for
the stress concentration factor is proposed for problems in
which the applied loading may be pure shear as well as pure
tension
Meyer and
Dharani (1991)
Model: a buffer strip laminate containing a circular cutout
Method: the classical shear-lag stress–displacement
relations
Result: lower modulus and higher failure strain buffer strips
are most efficient in increasing the notched strength of
laminates with circular cutouts
Palazotto
(1977)
Model: cylindrical shell with cutout
Loading: compressive loading
Method: the finite difference method
Result: the bifurcation load is within 11% of the
collapse force for each configuration
Pattabiraman
and Ramamerti
(1977)
Model: a cylindrical shell with a cutout
Loading: asymmetric bending
Method: superposed method
Result: the cutouts located at the bottom experience
greater stresses than those at the top and stresses
increase with load angle
Paul and Rao
(1995)
Model: thick FRP finite laminated plates containing two
circular holes
Loading: transverse uniform loading
Method: The finite element displacement method, along
with the Lo-Christensen-Wu high order bending theory
Result: the results obtained by this theory compare
favourably with the exact elasticity solutions, which
demonstrates the validity of the method. The variation of
the stress concentration factor, with respect to plate
thickness, hole size and distance between holes, is
presented in graphical form and discussed
(continued on next page)
C.-Y. Hsu et al. / Ocean Engineering 32 (2005) 1098–11211102
Table 1 (continued)
Author Synopsis Notes
Sanders (1970) Model: an arbitrary shape cutout of shallow shells
Method: Betti–Rayleigh principle
Result: obtained integral representations of general
solutions
Starnes (1972) Model: thin cylindrical shells with a circular hole
Loading: axial compression
Method: experimental method and analytical method based
on a simplified Rayleigh–Ritz type approximation
Result: The experimental results indicated that the character
of the shell buckling was depended on a parameter which is
proportional to the hole radius divided by the square root of
the product of the shell radius and thickness. The analytical
method provided an upper bound for the buckling stresses
of the cylinders tested with hole radii less than 10% of the
shell radii, and verified the dependence of the shell buckling
characteristics on the parameter used to correlate the
experimental results
C.-Y. Hsu et al. / Ocean Engineering 32 (2005) 1098–1121 1103
transient dynamic response of a submersible pressure hull which sustains the hydrostatic
pressure and/or shock wave.
Although the above investigations have provided numerous preliminary results related
to shells with holes and deep-diving submarine pressure hulls, to our knowledge, the effect
of a curved angle on the shell and the failure modes of the deep-diving spherical vehicle
under external pressure have not been systematically studied.
In light of the above developments, this work elucidates the curvature effects on stress
concentrations around a circular hole in an opened shallow cylindrical shell and the failure
modes of the deep-diving spherical vehicle under external pressure using the finite element
method. Design data are also developed for stress distribution around the hole for different
curved angles of the shell and for different failure modes for the deep-diving spherical
vehicle. Results presented herein provide a valuable reference for the designer of a shell
structure.
2. Theoretical background
The finite element procedure based on Hibbitt and Karlsson (1979, 1996) methodology
is adopted herein to investigate the curvature effects and failure modes’ influence on stress
concentrations around penetrations on an opened shallow cylindrical shell and Guppy type
shell under external pressure. The procedure uses the Newmark time implicit integration
scheme and Newton’s method, which includes dynamic equilibrium interaction
considering the half-step residual convergence tolerance. The plasticity relations, based
on von Mises’ yield criterion, assume the isotropic hardening rule for the elastroplastic
behavior of the material under study. The governing equation, solution method and
convergence tolerance are described as follows.
C.-Y. Hsu et al. / Ocean Engineering 32 (2005) 1098–11211104
2.1. Governing equation
The basis of the displacement-based finite element procedure is the principle of virtual
displacement. The surface traction at any point on surface S is the force fs per unit of
current area. Also, the body force at any point within the volume V of the material under
consideration is f b, per unit of volume.
Then the force equilibrium for the volume is:ðS
f sdA C
ðS
f bdV Z 0 (1)
By using the Gauss theorem and the definition of Cauchy stress, the virtual work
equation can be obtained as:ðV
tdedV Z
ðS
duf SdS C
ðV
duf bdV (2)
where t, e, and u denote the stress, strain and displacement, respectively. In addition, t, e,
and u are an equilibrium set:
f S Z nt;vdu
vx
� �t C f b Z 0; t Z tT (3)
and de and du are compatible:
de Z1
2
vdu
vxC
vdu
vx
� �T� �(4)
and du is compatible with all kinematics constraints.
The left-hand side of Eq. (2) is replaced with the integral over the reference volume of
the virtual work rate per reference volume, as defined by any conjugate pairing of stress s
and strain 3:ðV
sd3dV Z
ðS
ff SgTdudA C
ðV
ff bgdudV (5)
and since
du Z ½N�due; d3 Z ½B�due; s Z ½D�3 Z D½B�due;
where [N] represents interpolation functions which depend on some material coordinate
system, and [B] defines the strain variation from the variations of the kinematic variables
which are derivable immediately from the interpolation functions once the particular strain
measure to be used is defined. In addition, [D] denotes the relation between stress and
strain. Moreover, ue expresses the vector of nodal displacement of an element. The non-
linear equilibrium equations can be derived to the following from:ðVe
½B�T½D�½B�uedVe Z
ðSe
½N�Tff sgdSe C
ðV
½N�Tff bgdVe (6)
C.-Y. Hsu et al. / Ocean Engineering 32 (2005) 1098–1121 1105
This system of equations form the basis for the displacement-based finite element
analysis procedure, and has of the following form:
FnðumÞ Z 0 (7)
where Fn is the force component of the nth variable in the problem, and um denotes the
displacement of the mth variable.
2.2. Solution method
Herein, Newton’s method is used as a numerical technique for solving the non-linear
equilibrium equations. Allow cmiC1 to be the difference between the approximate solution
and exact solution to the discrite equilibrium equation. Eq. (7) can be denoted as:
Fnðumi Ccm
i Þ Z 0 (8)
Expanding the left-hand side of this equation in a Taylor series about the approximate
solution umi leads to:
Fnðumi ÞC
vFn
vupðun
i ÞcpiC1 C
v2Fn
vupvuqðum
i ÞcpiC1c
qiC1 C/Z 0 (9)
If the ith iteration solution umi is a close approximation to the exact solution, the
magnitude of the (iC1)th iteration solution umiC1 is small. Then, the first two terms
mentioned above can be neglected. In addition, the non-linear system of equations can be
expressed as follows:
Jnpi c
piC1 ZKFn
i (10)
where Jnpi is the Jacobian matrix:
Jnpi Z
vFn
vupðum
i Þ (11)
Then the next approximation to the solution is:
umiC1 Z um
i CcmiC1 (12)
2.3. Convergence tolerance
The convergence tolerance x of Eq. (12), which is an iteration process, is measured by
comparing the consecutive quantities of cmiC1 to see if they are sufficient small. Restated,
jumiC1 Kum
i j Z cmiC1%x (13)
3. Problem description
An opened shallow cylindrical shell and a Guppy type pressure shell which is
constructed of a spherical shell subjected to external pressure, are modeled to elucidate
Fig. 2. The opened shallow cylindrical shell profiles.
C.-Y. Hsu et al. / Ocean Engineering 32 (2005) 1098–11211106
how curvature and failure modes influence stress concentrations around a circular hole.
Their geometrical configuration, boundary condition, material property and element mesh
are described as follows.
3.1. Geometrical configuration and boundary condition
3.1.1. Opened shallow cylindrical shell
Fig. 2 presents the profiles of an opened shallow cylindrical shell and Table 2 lists the
detailed dimensions, where some symbols are defined as follows:
L:
the side of the shell and LZRap/180ZconstantP:
external pressurer:
the radius of the holeR:
the radius of curvature of the shellst:
thickness of the shella:
the curved angle of the shellb:
the location angle of the hole in the shellThe upper surface that comes into contact with the external pressure loading is defined
as the outer surface. The lower surface is the inner surface.
Eighteen curved angles (a) are considered in this study. Four sides of the shell are
considered as fully fixed.
Table 2
Detailed dimension of the opened shallow cylindrical shell
Curved angle, a
(8)
Radius of curva-
ture, R (m)
The side of the shell, LZ0.254 m; the radius of the hole, rZ0.0254 m; the external pressure, PZ6895 Pa; the location
angle of hole of the shell, b; the thickness of the shell, t.
Note: LZRap/180
0 Infinity
1 145.53
2 72.77
3 48.51
4 36.38
5 29.11
6 24.26
7 20.79
8 18.19
9 16.17
10 14.55
15 9.70
20 7.28
30 4.85
40 3.64
45 3.23
50 2.91
60 2.43
C.-Y. Hsu et al. / Ocean Engineering 32 (2005) 1098–1121 1107
3.1.2. Guppy type pressure hull
The Guppy type pressure hull is shown in Fig. 1 and her model is a single spherical
configuration with two hemispherical viewports forward and one hemispherical access
hatch overhead. Fig. 3 presents the geometrical configuration of a spherical shell and
Table 3 lists the detailed dimensions.
Herein, the boundary conditions are described as follows:
ux Z4x Z4y Z4zZ0, uys0, uzs0 at the nodes on the symmetric (Y–Z) plane, and
uy ZuzZ4x Z4y Z4zZ0, uys0 at the node A, where ux, uy, and uz denotes
displacements in the global X-, Y- and Z-direction; fx, fy, and fz denote rotation about
the global X-, Y- and Z-direction, respectively.
The upper surface that comes into contact with the external pressure loading is defined
as the outer surface. The lower surface is the inner surface.
3.2. Material property
3.2.1. Opened shallow cylindrical shell
The model is assumed herein to be constructed of high-tension steel (HTS). The
material properties are described as follows:
Young’s modulus: EZ2.04!1011 Pa
Poisson’s ratio: nZ0.3
Yield stress: syZ3.24!108 Pa
Fig. 3. The geometrical configuration of a Guppy type pressure hull.
C.-Y. Hsu et al. / Ocean Engineering 32 (2005) 1098–11211108
Table 3
The geometrical dimensions of a spherical shell
Spherical shell Manhole Viewport
The center of circle
(sphere) (R, q, f)
OZ(0, 08, 08) O1Z(0.8201 m, 08, 08) O2Z(0.8382 m, 678, 188)
Radius (m) RZ0.84455 r1Z0.2032 r2Z0.1016
Thickness (m) 0.0127 0.0508 0.0508
C.-Y. Hsu et al. / Ocean Engineering 32 (2005) 1098–1121 1109
3.2.2. Guppy type pressure hull
The model is assumed here to be constructed of HY100 high-tension steel. The material
properties are described as follows:
Young’s modulus: EZ2.10!1011 Pa
Poisson’s ratio: nZ0.29
Ultimate stress: suZ7.935!108 Pa
Yielding stress: syZ6.90!108 Pa
Mass density: rZ7.828!103 kg/m3
3.3. Loading
3.3.1. Opened shallow cylindrical shell
This study considers only the external pressure loading 6.8948!103 Pa (1.0 psi).
3.3.2. Guppy type pressure hull
There is a diving depth: for every 100 m, water pressure increases 9.795!105 Pa in
standard sea water. This study considers only the external hydrostatic pressure loading.
3.4. Meshing
In this study, the opened shallow cylindrical shell with the circular hole was modeled
by 9-node doubly curved thin shell elements and the Gyppy type shell was modeled using
two curved thin shell elements. The one is a 3-node triangular curved thin shell element.
The other hull is a 4-node doubly curved thin shell element
The 9-node doubly curved thin shell element has five degrees of freedom per node
(three displacement components and two in-surface rotation components)—ux, uy, uz, fx,
fy, and has four Gauss integration points in this element (Fig. 4). The 3-node triangular
curved thin shell element and 4-node doubly curved thin shell element also has five
degrees of freedom per node—ux, uy, uz, fx, fy, (Figs. 5 and 6).
The positive normal of the element is given by a right-hand rule going around the nodes
of the element in the order that they are given on the element data line.
3.4.1. Opened shallow cylindrical shell
There are 18 opened shallow cylindrical shell models, and each is modelled with
specified curved angle (a). At the specified curved angle (a), the relative finite element
model is illustrated in Fig. 7. The finite element model is meshed by 212 doubly curved
thin shell elements.
Fig. 4. Nine-nodes doubly curved thin shell element.
C.-Y. Hsu et al. / Ocean Engineering 32 (2005) 1098–11211110
3.4.2. Guppy pressure hull
The spherical submersible pressure hull was modeled using two curved thin shell
elements. The one is a 3-node triangular curved thin shell element (Fig. 5). The other hull
is a 4-node doubly curved thin shell element (Fig. 6). Owing to symmetry, only half of the
model is studied, as shown in Fig. 8. The pole circle of the spherical shell was modeled by
the former element and the others were modeled by the latter element. The 1/2 spherical
shell was meshed by 1584 four-node doubly curved thin shell elements and 40 three-node
triangular curved thin shell elements.
Fig. 5. The 3-node triangular curved thin shell element.
Fig. 6. The 4-node doubly curved thin shell element.
C.-Y. Hsu et al. / Ocean Engineering 32 (2005) 1098–1121 1111
3.5. von Mises stress definition
This study considers the von Mises stress (or equivalent stress) to reveal the stress
distribution phenomenon around the hole. The von Mises stress is defined as follows:
Fig. 7. Mesh of the opened shallow cylindrical shell.
Fig. 8. The finite mesh diagram of 1/2 spherical shell.
C.-Y. Hsu et al. / Ocean Engineering 32 (2005) 1098–11211112
von Mises Stress
sM Z
ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi1
2½ðs1 Ks2Þ
2 C ðs2 Ks3Þ2 C ðs3 Ks1Þ
2�
r(14)
where s1, s2, s3 denotes the principal stress
otherwise,
von Mises stress on the outer surface is denoted as so.
von Mises stress on the inner surface is denoted as si.
C.-Y. Hsu et al. / Ocean Engineering 32 (2005) 1098–1121 1113
4. Numerical results
4.1. Curvature effects on stress concentrations around the circular hole in opened shallow
cylindrical shell
In this study, the shell thickness is maintained at a constant value of 22.23 mm. The
curved angle a is expressed in degree form, ranging from 0 to 608. In addition, eighteen
curved angles are considered as follows:
aZ0; 1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6; 7; 8; 9; 10; 15; 20; 30; 40; 45; 50; 608
Figs. 9–12 summarize the analysis results of curvature effects.
Figs. 9 and 10 display von Mises stress around the circular hole on outer and inner
surface of the opened cylindrical shell for different curved angles aZ0–608, respectively.
These figures reveal the following:
1.
Extreme stress occurred about aZ0–58 for both outer and inner surfaces.2.
For the outer surface (Fig. 9):(a) The form of von Mises stress so resembles an exponential decay function.
(b) Maximum stress occurs on curved angle aZ38 and appears at the location angle
around the hole aZ908 where the value is 24.81 MPa.
Fig
. 9. The von Mises stress (Pa) so on outer surface for different curved angles of a (8) of the shell.Fig. 10. The von Mises stress (Pa) si on inner surface for different curved angles of a (8) of the shell.
C.-Y. Hsu et al. / Ocean Engineering 32 (2005) 1098–11211114
3.
For the inner surface (Fig. 10):(a) Maximum von Mises stress appears at curved angle aZ08. Herein, the location
angle is bZ458. Maximum stress values are 18.48 Mpa.
(b) Two groups of the series line are shown in Fig. 10. The group of the location angles is
less than bZ458, revealing that the curved angle increases and the stress around the
hole decreases as well. For the other groups, minimum stress appears in the interval
in which curved angles range from aZ0 to 98 and the form of stress line resembles a
concave form. In these groups, the observation that the curved angles exceed aZ208
reveals the curved angle increase and the stress around the hole will decrease.
4.
The comparison of the maximum stress so is about 25% higher than that of si. Figs. 11and 12 summarize the stress distribution configuration around the hole boundary for
different curved angles. These figures reveal the following results:
(a) Extreme stress nearly occurs at around bZ0, 45, 90, 135 180, 225, 270, 3158, for
both outer and inner surfaces.
(b) If the shell is flat (aZ08), maximum stress appears at bZ45, 135, 225, 3158. In
addition, the value is 18.48 MPa.
(c) In the outer surface (Fig. 11):
(i) When the curved angle ranges from aZ0 to 308, maximum stress occurs on
location angle bZ90, 2708.
Fig. 11. The von Mises stress distribution (Pa), so around the hole on inner surface for different curved
angles of a (8).
C.-Y. Hsu et al. / Ocean Engineering 32 (2005) 1098–1121 1115
Fig. 12. The von Mises stress distribution (Pa), si around the hole on inner surface for different curved
angles of a (8).
C.-Y. Hsu et al. / Ocean Engineering 32 (2005) 1098–11211116
Fig. 13. The von Mises stress (Pa) around the access hatch on inner and outer surface for pressure hull of actual model.
C.-Y. Hsu et al. / Ocean Engineering 32 (2005) 1098–1121 1117
(ii) Maximum stress gradually increases from aZ0 to 38 and gradually decreases
from aZ4 to 608.
(d) For the inner surface of the shell (Fig. 12):
(i) If the curved angle ranges from aZ0 to 98, maximum stress occurs on location
Fig. 14. The global buckling of pressure hull of actual model from buckling mode shapes (mode1wmode10).
C.-Y. Hsu et al. / Ocean Engineering 32 (2005) 1098–11211118
C.-Y. Hsu et al. / Ocean Engineering 32 (2005) 1098–1121 1119
angle bZ0, 1808. When the curved angle ranges from aZ9 to 608, maximum
stress occurs on location angle bZ90, 2708.
(ii) The maximum stress gradually decreases from aZ0 to 608.
4.2. The failure modes of Guppy type pressure hull vessel under uniform external pressure
For the Guppy type pressure hull, shell thickness is maintained at a constant value of
12.70 mm and shell thickness arround the access hatch and viewports linearly increases
from 12.70 to 50.8 mm. Under uniform external pressure, a thin-walled spherical pressure
hull can collapse from external pressure in three different modes, due to axisymmetric
yield, ultimate stress or by buckling manner. The failure modes depend on a number of
factors, including thickness, radius ratio of the vessel and the mechanical properties of its
construction material.
Failure due to yield is perhaps the most important failure mode of vessels under
external pressure. From Fig. 13, we can find that the diving depth of the HY-100 steel at
yielding strength is 800 m, the hydrostatic pressure is 7.836!106 Pa, and the maximum
von Mises stress around the access hatch on inner surface of the spherical shell is 6.87!108 Pa at q1Z08.
The failure mechanism may be divided into two areas—plastic buckling at stress
levels below the proportional limit of the stress–strain curve and inelastic buckling at
stress levels above the proportional limit. The eigenvalue buckling analysis is
generally used to estimate the critical load of stiff structures and can provide useful
estimates of collapse mode shapes.
The critical buckling load, Pcr, is defined by:
Pcr Z P0 Cli !P (15)
where P0 is the dead load, P is caused by application of pressure, and li are the
eigenvalues. Fig. 14 indicates the first ten buckling mode shapes. This finding suggests that
the first buckling mode eigenvalue is 334, critical buckling load is 3.34!107 Pa, and
buckling collapse depth is 3410 m.
5. Conclusion
This study elucidates the curvature effect on stress concentrations around a circular hole
in the curved shell and the failure modes of the Guppy type pressure hull under external
pressure loading using the finite element method.
Based on the results presented herein, we can conclude the following:
5.1. Curvature effect for an opened shallow cylindrical shell
1.
Extreme stress always occurs at about bZ0, 45, 90, 135, 180, 225, 270, 3158 fordifferent curved angles a.
C.-Y. Hsu et al. / Ocean Engineering 32 (2005) 1098–11211120
2.
If the shell is flat, i.e. aZ08, maximum stress appears at bZ45, 135, 225, 3158.3.
For the outer surface:(a) When the curved angle ranges from aZ0 to 308, maximum stress occurs on
location angle bZ90, 2708. Stress gradually decreases from aZ0 to 38 and
gradually increases from aZ4 to 308.
(b) If aZ40 and 458, maximum stress appears at the bZ67.5, 112.5, 247.5, 292.58.
(c) If aZ50 and 608, maximum stress appears at the bZ45, 135, 225, 3158.
4.
For the inner surface of the shell,(a) If the curved angle is aZ0–88, maximum stress occurs on location angle bZ0,
1808.
(b) When the curved angle is aZ9–608, maximum stress occurs on location angle
bZ90, 2708. Stress gradually decreases from aZ0 to 608.
5.
For different curved angles, most maximum stress levels gradually decrease with anincreasingly curved angle. This finding suggests that the shell that has larger curved
angles can more aptly resist to external pressure loading.
5.2. For the Guppy type pressure hull
This study examines the results presented herein. We can conclude the following:
1.
The stress level around holes on the spherical shell is higher than at other sections.2.
The stress level increases with the increasing radius of the shell penetration.3.
The stress level of critical sections of the hull structure always occurs around holes.These phenomena are induced by the discontinuity and stress concentration. Therefore
when the designing, the shell’s thickness must be reinforced around holes.
4.
We can find that the diving depth of the HY-100 steel at yielding strength is 800 m.5.
The buckling collapse depth of the Guppy type pressure hull is 3410 m.References
Abdul-Mihsein, M.J., Fenner, R.T., Tan, C.L., 1979. Boundary integral equation analysis of elastic stresses
around an oblique hole in a flat plate. J. Strain Anal. 14, 179–185.
Allmendinger, E.E., 1990. Submersible Vehicle System Design. SNAME, NJ p. 49.
Bonde, D.H., Rao, K.P., 1980. Stresses around two equal circular elastic inclusions in a pressurised cylindrical
shell. Comput. & Struct. 11, 257–263.
Bull, J.W., 1982. Stress around large circular holes in uniform circular cylindrical shells. J. Strain Anal. 17, 9–12.
Deans, D., 1990. Effect of openings in ring-reinforced shells. Marine Technol. 27, 56–64.
Dyke, P.V., 1965. Stresses about a circular hole in a cylindrical shell. AIAA J. 3, 1733–1742.
Faulker, D., 1983. The collapse strength and design of submarines, In: RINA Symposium on Naval Submarine,
paper No. 6.
Foo, S.S.B., 1992. On the limit analysis of cylindrical shells with a single cutout. Int. J. Pressure Vessels and
Piping 49, 1–6.
Gao, X.-L., 1996. A general solution of an infinite elastic plate with an elliptic hole under biaxial loading. Int.
J. Pressure Vessels and Piping 67, 95–104.
Garland, C., 1968. Design and fabrication on deep-diving submersible pressure hull. SNAME Trans. 76, 161–
179.
C.-Y. Hsu et al. / Ocean Engineering 32 (2005) 1098–1121 1121
Garzke, W.H., Yoerger, D.R., Harris, S., Dulin, R.O., Brown, D.K., 1993. Deep underwater exploration vehicles-
past, present and future. SNAME Trans. 101, 485–536.
Gifford, L.N., Jones, R.F., 1971. Structural Analysis of Deep Submergence Pressure Hulls, vol. 12. LS-HI of
SNAME, Hawaii pp. 1–18.
Gorman, J.J., Louie, L.L., 1991. Submersible pressure hull design parametric. SNAME Trans. 99, 119–146.
Hibbitt, H.D., Karlsson, B.I., 1979. Analysis of Pipe Whip. EPRI (Report NP-1208).
Hibbitt, Karlsson&Sorensen Inc., 1996. ABAQUS Theory Manual, Pawtucket, USA.
Hooke, C.J., Demunshi, G., 1977. Stress concentration factors around the intersection of two cylindrical holes in
an infinite elastic body. J. Strain Anal. 12, 217–222.
Huang, W.-C., 1972. Theoretical study of stress concentrations at circular holes and inclusions in strain hardening
materials. Int. J. Solids Struct. 8, 149–192.
Jackson, H.A., 1992. Fundamentals of submarine concept design. SNAME Trans. 100, 419–448.
Liang, Cho-Chung, Hsu, Ching-Yu, Tsai, Huei-Rong, 1997. Minimum weight design of submersible pressure hull
under hydrostatic pressure. Comput. & Struct. 63 (2), 187–201.
Liang, Cho-Chung, Lai, Wen-Hao, Hsu, Ching-Yu, 1998. A study of nonlinear response of submersible pressure
hull. Int. J. Pressure Vessels and Piping 75, 131–149.
Mangalgiri, P.D., 1984. Pin-loaded holes in large orthotropic plates. AIAA J. 22, 1478–1484.
McKee, A.I., 1959. Recent submarine design practices and problems. SNAME Trans. 67, 623–652.
Meyer, E.S., Dharani, L.R., 1991. Stress concentration at circular cutouts in buffer strip laminates. AIAA J. 29,
1967–1972.
Patel, Sharad, A., Birnbaum, Michael, R., 1969. Creep stress concentration at a circular hole in an infinite plate.
AIAA J. 7, 54–59.
Palazotto, A.N., 1977. Bifuraction and collapse analysis of stringer and ring-stringer stiffened cylindrical shells
with cutouts. Comput. Struct. 7, 47–58.
Pattabiraman, J., Ramamerti, V., 1977. Stress around a small circular cutout in a cylindrical shell subjected to
asymmetric bending. J. Strain Anal. 12, 53–61.
Paul, T.K., Rao, K.M., 1995. Finite element stress analysis of laminated composite plates containing two circular
holes under transverse loading. Comput. & Struct. 54 (4), 671–677.
Pinchas, B.-Y., Jacob, A., 1985. Interlaminar stress analysis for laminated plates containing a curvilinear hole.
Comput. & Struct. 21, 917–932.
Sanders, J., 1970. Cutouts in shallow shells. J. Appl. Mech., Trans. ASME January, 374–383.
Starnes Jr., J.H., 1972. Effect of a circular hole on the buckling of cylindrical shells loaded by axial compression.
AIAA J. 10, 1466–1472.
Watson, W., 1971. The design, construction, testing, and operation of a deep-diving submersible for ocean floor
exploration. SNAME Trans. 79, 405–439.
Winker, K., Nordseewerke, T., 1983. Trends in the design of conventional submarine, In: RINA Symposium on
Naval Submarine, paper No. 7