PBN for ANSPs: Concept 2030 for ANSPs - Panel.pdf · •A shared vision and intense collaboration...
Transcript of PBN for ANSPs: Concept 2030 for ANSPs - Panel.pdf · •A shared vision and intense collaboration...
PBN for ANSPs: Concept 2030Jeff Cochrane, NAV CANADA
Phil Rakena, Airways New ZealandJeff Williams, Tetratech AMT
Why PBN for ANSPs: Concept 2030?
• PBN remains ICAO air navigation priority
• CANSO Vision 2020 commitment for PBN
• 15yr Operator/ANSP equipment lifecycle
• Identify PBN technologies (current & future), capabilities, resources, challenges for ANSPs
• Assist CANSO members with strategic PBN planning for 2030.
Executive Summary
• PBN = safety and consistency; enables CCO/CDO, ATFM
• Globally PBN implementation slips behind ICAO targets
• ICAO GANP, IATA, SESAR, NextGen provide strong insight into where PBN is heading
• Some ANSPs are well ahead of ASBU targets; others have no PBN Implementation plan or strategy
• Given 15-yr replacement life cycle, 2030 capabilities are being considered now
Introduction
• CANSO thought leadership – adding value for members• Drive alignment and harmonisation of aviation
standards• ANSP success depends on addressing and investing in
the needs and expectations of all stakeholders. • A shared vision and intense collaboration will ensure
we make the right decisions at appropriate times. • PBN for ANSPs: Concept 2030 will help shape our
collective future and progress PBN as a major driving force in aviation - building operational safety, efficiency, and capacity.
Operational Vision
• PBN is an enabler for 4D efficiency, across FIRs
• Target environment RNP 2, RNP 1, RNP APCH..
• Oceanic/Remote Continental
• Enroute
• Terminal
• Approach with Vertical Guidance (APV)
PBN Navigational Infrastructure
• GNSS (4 core constellations)
• Multi-Constellation (MCDF)
• SBAS (DF), GBAS, ABAS
• Data management
• Contingency Infrastructure
• Regulations
Safety
• Implementing RNP APCH with vertical guidance (APV)– ICAO Assembly ResolutionA37-11
• PBN enables straight-in and APVapproaches
• Collaborative SMS enabling timelyapprovals and reduced duplication
• Performance based regulation standards replace the need for unique safety cases
Environmental & Community
• Technical challenges are largely resolved; Environmental issues are taking precedence
• ANSPs and airport operators must work closely with environmental communities early
• State level guidance will be provided to ensure appropriate level of public consultation
• Community involvement will be the standard change management process
RPAS and UAS
• Smaller RPAS operating <500ft AGL / outside controlled airspace will not be part of ATM system
• Instead they may be managed by UAS Traffic Management (UTM) system
• Larger RPAS may meet TSO certification standards and operate in controlled airspace
– Barometric Altimetry challenge
Discussion
• Is this concept too aggressive?
• Is it realistic?– Operations: Oceanic/Enroute/Terminal/Approach
– PBN Navigational Infrastructure
– Safety
– Environmental & Community
– RPAS andUAS
• Does this align with your currentnavigation strategy?
• Tell us where this concept may helpdrive strategy and investment decisions?
Thank you!