PBN Deployment – New Zealand Domestic Airspace CAA PBN Forum November 18 2009 Auckland.
-
Upload
maud-dennis -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
Transcript of PBN Deployment – New Zealand Domestic Airspace CAA PBN Forum November 18 2009 Auckland.
PBN Deployment – New Zealand Domestic Airspace
CAA PBN Forum
November 18 2009
Auckland
Background Drivers
• Modern FMS
• Ground aids reaching end of life
• Operational efficiency
• Environmental
• ICAO
• IATA
70 % rule
• FAA experience.
• Less than 70% users able to use – don’t implement
• More than 70% users able to use – implement
• and withdraw conventional
In the beginning
• Establish RNAV as the default language/method of navigation and ATM
• at AA, WN and CH– 1/. RNAV STAR
– 2/. RNAV SID
– 3/. RNAV En-route between
– 4/. RNAV approach as supplement to ILS
Followed by
• Establishing RNAV as default language/method of navigation and ATM
• at all airports with regional control towers– 1/. HN, RO, TG
– 2/. NV, DN, WP
– 3/. NS, WB
– 4/. OH, PM, NP
– 5/. NR, GS
Ideal roll out – ATC perspective
• Airport specific - implement as a package
• RNAV STAR
• RNAV Approach
• RNAV SID
• Separation charts to enable management
• Staff training
Current anomalies/difficulties
• Some regional airports have parts of the package.
• Result of nav aids reaching end of life.
• Mixed fleet equipage.
• Complex lateral separations
• Mixed messages.
Existing PBN procedures
• RNP10 (RNAV 10) in OCA
• RNP4 Trans-Tasman
• RNAV Enroute
• RNAV SIDs and STARs
• RNAV(GNSS) 57 locations
• APV @ 16 runways
• RNP AR @ Queenstown
• RNP AR @ RO, AA, WN, CH coming
So what’s to come
• Establish/confirm the Regional PBN Plan
• Initial scoping meeting – July 09
• ATC planning meeting - 5,6,7,8 Oct 09
• Feedback from regional CCs
• Ongoing coordination with users.
• User meeting 1 Dec 09
• Generic Tower Model established (Feb 2010)
Generic Regional Tower model
• McDonalds
• Supermarket
• From RNAV En-route to Feeder Fix
• RNAV STAR to Approach.
• Approach will be RNAV (GNSS).
• Upgrade to APV (Baro V NAV).
• Need to limit choices
• Assume VORs (used as approach aid) will go ?
• ICAO – PBN APV to all instrument runways by 2016
Chunks – step one
• Queenstown
• By itself – unique – jet – terrain – RNP AR
• Current ATM very inefficient with regards to traffic “flow”
• Departure example, 23 minute delay once RNP approach “committed”.
• Review in progress.
• Next meeting 23, 24, November
Chunks - step two
• RO, HN, TG
• Plan Feb, March, April 2010
• Implement Nov 2010
Chunks – step three
• NV, DN, WP Plan May, June 2010
• NS, WB Plan July, Aug 2010
• OH, PM, NP Plan Sept, October 2010
• NR, GS Plan Feb March 2011
• Implement through 2011
PBN – Issues/Considerations
• Customer needs – sort this out first
• Fleet capability
• Charting standards
• Procedure design capability
• Regulator capability (rules) to approve PBN operations
• Public vs. Tailored RNP AR
• ATM considerations - Mixed mode operations
• What noise there is gets concentrated
• Who’s going to pay?
PBN – Issues/Considerations (2)
• Equipment performance standards
• RAIM Prediction service
• Back-up procedures
• Contingency – DME/DME, DVOR
• Flight planning requirements – ATM
• Training requirements
ATM system ability
• A lost message.
• ATM system still needs to monitor and assist the aircraft with PBN
• Current ground system could provide much more.
• Off track alert - Turn initiation - Cleared altitude vs actual climb
• For ATC to use this ability aircraft need
• Enhanced mode s - capable of up grade to
• ADS-B
RNAV Arrivals – Noise Concentration
Thank you