PBMAS An Overview 2015 PBMAS and Intervention Activities.
-
Upload
gervais-gordon -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
2
Transcript of PBMAS An Overview 2015 PBMAS and Intervention Activities.
PBMAS
An Overview 2015 PBMAS and Intervention Activities
PBMAS Acronyms
PL Performance Level RI Required Improvement SA Special Analysis PJSA Professional Judgment Special
Analysis YAE Year After Exit MSRMinimum size Requirement
PBMAS
A district-level accountability system that reviews the effectiveness of the following federal and state program areas: Bilingual Education/English as a Second Language Career and Technical Education No Child Left Behind Special Education
PBMAS
Districts receive Performance Levels (PLs) in each area
TEA stages districts for interventions based on performance level cut pointsSpecific to each programDiffers from year-to-year
Calendar/Communication Plan
MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SAT/SUN
2015
28 September 29 30 1 October 2 3/4
5 6 7 8 9 10/11
12 13 14 15 16 17/18
19 20 21 22 23 24/25
26 27 28 29 30 31/1 November
2 3 4 5 6 7/8
october
MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SAT/SUN
2015
26 October 27 28 29 30 31/1 November
2 3 4 5 6 7/8
9 10 11 12 13 14/15
16 17 18 19 20 21/22
23 24 25 26 27 28/29
november
30 1 December 2 3 4 5/6
Let’s Take a Look
How does State Accountability and PBMAS correlate?
Accountability and 2014 PBMAS Indicator Correlations
Staging
How Did We Get Here?
Staging Process
Each program staged separately. Special Education staging incorporated 4 federal
requirements with PBMAS indicators to make staging determinations.
Rank districts by the number of PL 4s, 3s, and 2s. Determine where natural cut points come for the
different stages.
So What is a PL?
A performance level (PL) is the result that occurs when a standard is applied to a district’s performance on an indicator. The performance levels available for indicators in the 2015 PBMAS include Not Assigned (NA) (including Not Assigned through SA or DI), 0, 0 SA, 0 RI, 1, 1 SA, 2, 2 SA, 3, and 3 SA. SA refers to special analysis, which is described in the Minimum Size Requirements and Special Analysis section. RI refers to Required Improvement, which is also described in a separate section. DI refers to data integrity and is used in combination with the NA performance level to address situations where compromised data render any other performance level impossible to determine.
PBMAS indicators all include a range of PLs, and each PL range has an established set of cut points. Throughout the PBMAS indicators, the higher the PL is, the lower
the district’s performance is.
Staging Process
Criteria for Selection of Districts for
2015-2016 On-site Reviews Districts with one or more program areas staged at a
level 4 Districts meeting the above criteria but also having
received an-site review in 2014-2015 are exempted for an additional review this year, and will instead be provided post-visit interventions (PCVI)
41 districts with at least one stage four
12 of these districts were visited last year and will be PVI
29 on-site reviews
PBM Guidance Document
Another Reminder
The staging for special education of a district =
District’s determination status
24
Events
Contacts
Escalations
Noncompliance
Communication Log
Bilingual Education/English as a Second Language (BE/ESL) Stage 2
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Stage 1
SPED Determination Status: Needs Interventions Stage 3
Performance-Based Monitoring (PBM)
Mayberry ISDRegion 30
TEC §39.306(a)Each board of trustees shall publish an annual report describing the educational performance of the district and of each campus in the district that includes uniform student performance and descriptive information as determined under rules adopted by the commissioner. The annual report must also include:
(3) The district’s current special education compliance status with the agency.
25
TAPRAEIS
26
201
2014-2015 Texas Academic Performance Report
District Name: Mayberry ISD
District Number: 709543
2015 Accountability Rating: Met Standard
PBM Special Education Monitoring Results Status: Completed: Noncompliance Follow-up
Previous
Reporting
27
201
2014-2015 Texas Academic Performance Report
District Name: Mayberry ISD
District Number: 709543
2015 Accountability Rating: Met Standard
Special Education Determination Status: Needs Substantial Interventions
Beginning this year
Special Education Compliance ReviewsFor districts that receive a stage 3 or 4, the district is required to conduct a compliance review.
New templates to conduct this compliance review can be in the used by districts to conduct the review.
New chart indicates which templates to use for the review depending on the indicators in which a district has received a performance level of 2, 3, or 4.
A new reporting template to report what the district identified during the compliance review.
28
Special Education Compliance Templates 9 templates:
Properly constituted ARD committee(includes questions about surrogate/foster parents
IEP Development/Implementation Commensurate School Day Participation in State Assessments LRE Current Evaluation Certified/qualified staff Behavior/discipline Transition
Special Education
Special Education Additional Indicators STAAR Alt 2 Participation SPED Regular Class >= 80% SPED Regular Class < 40% SPED Representation (Student Groups) SPED DAEP, ISS, OSS
BE/ESL
BE / ESL Additional Indicators
TELPAS Reading Proficiency TELPAS Composite
CTE
CTE Additional Indicators
Nontraditional Males Nontraditional Females
NCLB
Interventions
So Now What?
ISAM
Identify district staff member with ISAM (Intervention Stage and Activity Manager) access If no staff member has access, request
access IMMEDIATELY!
We Are in Stage 1or 2…Why Do We Need Access to ISAM? Assign program contacts in case you are
selected for random validation Assign DCSI Click on
“Summary”
We Are in Stage 1or 2…Why Do We Need Access to ISAM? Make sure the correct year is selected All contact information can be entered
from this link
Click on “Contacts”
We Are in Stage 1or 2…Why Do We Need Access to ISAM?
Complete all contact information
Add multiple programs, as necessary
Performance-Based Monitoring All interventions will occur through the TAIS
process Multiple events have integrated interventions
District Leadership Team (DLT) Core Analysis Team is now the DLT
Must include a District Coordinator of School Improvement (DCSI)
Composed of key district personnel and stakeholders determined by the district
Should include: representatives from program(s) staged for intervention District staff responsible for school improvement Curriculum and instruction staff representative Other programs impacting student performance/program
effectiveness
District Leadership Team (DLT) Districts should also consider selecting
participants from the list on pp. 4-5 of the “Changes in PBM Guidance Document”
DLT list does not have to be submitted, unless requested
DLT Meeting
In preparation for this meeting: Identify appropriate data to review and
templates to complete (district decision)Notify team members in advance to bring
additional data to the meeting, as neededCreate an agenda with date of meeting and
sign-in section
Templates
Optional Format Improvement Plan template available
on the PMI website at:http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index2.aspx?id=2147495557&menu_id=2147483703
Team Meetings
Conduct team meeting Briefly review PBMAS and the area/indicators in
which your district was flagged Discuss the intervention process Share locally-determined templates (FDA, etc.) Gather information from the team, and complete
templates Complete Targeted Improvement Plan Complete Corrective Action Plan, IF NECESSARY
Finalizing Documents
Polish documents created by the team Schedule and conduct follow-up team
meetings, as necessary If appropriate, have sub-committee meet to
work on documents
Submitting Documents
If submissions are required, have district ISAM user upload documents, as necessary
Submitting Documents If submissions are NOT required:
File electronic copies of the completed templates and meeting agendas/sign-ins with at least two district employees who can readily access and provide the documents should your district be selected for random validation
File hard copies of the completed templates and meeting agendas/sign-ins in a location where at least two district employees can readily access the documents should the need arise to provide the documents to TEA
TAIS Intervention Process
What Interventions Are Required?
Roundtable Discussion from Program Areas
BE/ESLCTENCLBSpecial Education
RF
Q and A TAIS Training Work session with program areas