Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough
description
Transcript of Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough
![Page 1: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
PSCD01 - 11 Oct. 2005
UTSC
![Page 2: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Understanding of extrasolar and solar planetary systems through theory of their formation
Introdroducing extrasolar systems
Protoplanetary disks
Disk-planet interaction: resonances and torques, numerical calculations, mass buildup, migration of planets
Dusty disks in young planetary systems
Origin of structure in dusty disks
![Page 3: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Already the Ancient...…had a good theory of star and planet formation
![Page 4: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Some of the earliest recorded physics was very far-sighted & essentially correct! Predicted: evolution (formation/decay), role of disks, and diversity of “worlds”=planets.
Atomists (Ionian materialists) devoted 50% of theirphilosophy to cosmos, not microcosmos
![Page 5: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
C.)
Democritusbibliography: 60 vol, none survived
480C.)
Leucippus
THEN: = NOW:Worlds () Planetary systems (terra firma + atmosphere + moons + sun + stars)
matter:- made of the same types cosmic (solar)abundanceatoms and void everywhere- evolving yes- large variety yes - include Earth-like worlds ? NASA's goal
HOW ANCIENT GREEK ATOMISTSdeduced ("invented") other worlds
![Page 6: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
From: Diogenes Laertius, (3rd cn. A.D.), IX.31
“The worlds come into being as follows: many bodies of all sorts and shapes move from the infinite into a great void; they come together there and produce a single whirl, in which, colliding with one another and revolving in all manner of ways, they begin to separate like to like.” Leucippus
(Solar nebula of Kant & Laplace A.D. 1755-1776? Accretion disk?)
“There are innumerable worlds which differ in size.In some worlds there is no Sun and Moon, in others they are larger than in our world, and in others more numerous. (...) in some parts they are arising, in others failing.They are destroyed by collision with one another. There are some worlds devoid of living creatures or plants or any moisture.” Democritus(Planets predicted: around pulsars, binary stars, close to stars?)
There are infinite worlds both like and unlike this world of ours. For the atoms being infinite in number (...) there nowhere exists an obstacle to the infinite number od worlds. Epicurus (341-270 B.C.)
![Page 7: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
(...) it follows that there cannot be more worlds than one.
Aristotle [On the Heavens]
Plato and Aristotle
Aristotle's work rediscovered and enthusiastically accepted during the 12th century Renaissance at the new universities (Paris, Oxford)
e.g., Roger Bacon (1214-1292) cites the impossibility of vacuum between the hypothetical multiple worlds.
Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) also accepts Aristotle's arguments about impossibility of other worlds, despite a growing controversy within Church.
![Page 8: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Obviously, a very ancient and worthy quest…
…as well as controversial
![Page 9: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
OTHER WORLDS: the pendulum starts swinging
Franciscans: God can create other worlds.
Idea of Earth's uniqueness censored under the threat of excommunication :In 1277 bishop of Paris, Etienne Tempier, officially condemns 219 passages from Aristotle taught at universities, among others that "the First Cause cannot make many worlds".
Many supporters of other worlds, e.g., William of Ockham (ca.1280-1347).Mikolaj Kopernik's heliocentric system (1543) seen as supporting other worlds. Giordano Bruno: infinite number of inhabited terrestrial planets. Burned at stake 1600 by Holy Roman Inquisition (though not predominantly for that!).
William of Vorilong (ca. 1450) thought that it is "not fitting" for Christ to go to another world to die again. And there is no mention of other worlds in Scriptures.Johannes Kepler (1571-1630) did not believe that stars are distant suns or that they may have planets.
And so on, until the end of 20th century came...
![Page 10: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Kant-Laplace nebula ~ primitive solar nebula ~ accretion disk~ protoplanetary disk ~ T Tauri disk
R. Descartes (1595-1650) - vortices of matter
-> planets
I. Kant (1755) - nebular hypothesis
(recently revived by: Cameron et al, Boss)
P.S. de Laplace (1796) - version with rings
![Page 11: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Stars and Brown Dwarfs…form in stellar nurseries from/with protostellar disks
![Page 12: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
![Page 13: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Oph Giant Molecular Cloud, 160 pc awaycontains numerous dark clouds
![Page 14: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Oph V380 Ori + NGC1999
GMCs contain: dark clouds, cores, Bok globulesGMC mass / solar mass ~ 105
![Page 15: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Dark clouds
L57 Barnard 68
![Page 16: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
![Page 17: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
![Page 18: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
![Page 19: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
UKAFF (UK Astroph. Fluid Facility)
Our tools…parallel supercomputers:dozens to thousands of fast PCsconnected by a very fast network
UTSC: SunGrid cluster, ~200 cpus
![Page 20: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
ANTARES/FIREANT
Stockholm Observatory
20 cpu (Athlons)mini-supercomputer
(upgraded in 2004 with 18 Opteron 248CPUs inside SunFireV20z workstations)
![Page 21: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Matthew Bate(2003), Bate and Benz (2003)SPH, 1.5M particles
starting from turbulentgas cloud
![Page 22: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Simulations produce large numbers of Brown Dwarfs
![Page 23: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Brown Dwarfs in OphiucusNumerous
![Page 24: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Trapezium cluster in Orion
with many Brown Dwarfs
HST/NICMOS
F110W+F160W
![Page 25: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
5 M_jup planet around a 25 M_jup Brown Dwarf in 2MASS1207
There are rater few such star-bound brown dwarfs (so-called brown dwarf desert) but… the desert isn’t barren:
ESO/VLT AO HST/NICMOS, 1.6um
![Page 26: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Primordial diskshave many names:
protostellar disks
T Tau disks
proplyds
protoplanetary disks
solar nebulae
![Page 27: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Protoplanetary disks == protostellar disks = solar nebulae
![Page 28: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
![Page 29: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
![Page 30: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Young protoplanetary disks (proplyds)are rather bland in appearance
No gaps or fine detail seen in the density, exceptfor rather sharp edges <== photoevaporation
Photoevaporation is like boiling off gas by striking the hydrogen atoms with UV photons, kicking electrons and ions, and raising local kT to conditionsresembling HII regions. Photoevaporation only works in regions where gravitational binding energy is less than kT: outer parts of cloud complexes, far-away disk regions
gravitational binding = grav.potential well’s depth =-GM(r)/r (for spherical systems)
![Page 31: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
![Page 32: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Percentage of optically thick “outer disks” (at ~3 AU)
From: M. Mayers,S. Beckwith et al.
Conclusion:Major fraction of dustcleared out to several AU in 3-10 Myr
This is the timescalefor giant planet formation
0.1 1 100 1000 MyrAge
10
![Page 33: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
The evolutionary sequenceThe birth of planetary systems
![Page 34: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Formation of disks and planets up to T Tau phase
![Page 35: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Formation of disks and planets post- T Tau phase
![Page 36: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
![Page 37: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
![Page 38: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Dusty disksaround main-sequence stars
1. Transitional
2. Debris disks
3. Zodiacal light
![Page 39: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Infrared excess stars (Vega phenomenon)
![Page 40: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Source: P. Kalas
![Page 41: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
At the age of 1-10 Myr the primordial solar nebulae = protoplanetary disks = T Tau accretion disksundergo a metamorphosis
They lose almost all H and He and after a brief period astransitional disks, become low-gas high-dustiness Beta Pictoris systems (Vega systems).
Beta Pictoris
A silhouette disk in Orionstar-forming nebula
![Page 42: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Prototype of Vega/beta-Pic systems
![Page 43: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Beta Pictoris
11 micron image analysis converting observed fluxto dust area (Lagage & Pantin 1994)
B Pic b(?) sky?
![Page 44: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
![Page 45: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Chemical basis for universality of exoplanets:
cosmic composition (Z=0.02 = abundance of heavy elem.)
cooling sequence: olivines, pyroxenes dominant, then H2O
![Page 46: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Hubble Space Telescope/ NICMOS infrared camera
![Page 47: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
HD 141569A is a Herbig emission star>2 x solar mass, >10 x solar luminosity,Emission lines of H are double, because they come from a rotating inner gas disk. CO gas has also been found at r = 90 AU. Observations by Hubble Space Telescope (NICMOS near-IR camera).
Age ~ 5 Myr
transitional disk
![Page 48: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
HD 14169A disk (HST observations), gap confirmedby the new observations
![Page 49: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Gas-dust coupling? Planetary
perturbations? Dust avalanches?
HD 141569A: Spiral structure detected by (Clampin et al. 2003)Advanced Camera for Surveys onboard Hubble Space Telescope
![Page 50: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Radial-velocity planetsaround normal stars
![Page 51: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
![Page 52: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
-450: Extrasolar systems predicted (Leukippos, Demokritos). Formation in disks-325 Disproved by Aristoteles
1983: First dusty disks in exoplanetary systems discovered by IRAS
1992: First exoplanets found around a millisecond pulsar (Wolszczan & Dale)
1995: Radial Velocity Planets were found around normal, nearby stars,via the Doppler spectroscopy of the host starlight, starting with Mayor & Queloz, continuing wth Marcy & Butler, et al.
![Page 53: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Orbital radii + masses of the extrasolar planets (picture from 2003)
These planets were foundvia Doppler spectroscopyof the host’s starlight.
Precision of measurement:~3 m/s
Hot jupitersRadial migration
![Page 54: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
![Page 55: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Like us? NOT REALLY
![Page 56: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
![Page 57: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Masset and Papaloizou (2000); Peale, Lee (2002)
Some pairs of exoplanets may be caught in a 2:1 resonance
![Page 58: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Marcy and Butler (2003)
![Page 59: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
~2003
2005
![Page 60: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
From Terquem & Papaloizou (2005)
Mass histogram semi-major axis distr.
![Page 61: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
M sin I vs. a
![Page 62: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Eccentricity of exoplanets vs. a and m sini
![Page 63: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
![Page 64: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Metallicity of the star
![Page 65: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
The case of Upsilon And examined: Stable or unstable? Resonant? How, why?...
![Page 66: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Upsilon Andromedae two outer giant planets have STRONG interactions
Innersolarsystem(samescale)
![Page 67: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
![Page 68: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
.
1
2Definition of logitude of pericenter (periapsis) or misalignment angle
![Page 69: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
In the secular pertubation theory, semi-major axes (energies) are constant (as a result of averaging over time).
Eccentricities and orbit misalignment vary, such asto conserve the angular momentum and energy of the system.
We will show sets of thin theoretical curves for (e2, dw).[There are corresponding (e3, dw) curves, as well.]
Thick lines are numerically computed full N-body trajectories.
Classical celestial mechanics
![Page 70: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
ecce
ntr
icit
y
Orbit alignment angle
0.8 Gyr integration of 2 planetary orbitswith 7th-8th order Runge-Kutta method
Initial conditionsnot those observed!
![Page 71: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
Upsilon And: The case of very good alignment of periapses: orbital elements practically unchanged for 2.18 Gyr
![Page 72: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
N-body (planet-planet) or disk-planet interaction?Conclusions from modeling Ups And
1. Secular perturbation theory and numerical calculations spanning 2 Gyr do agree.2. The apsidal “resonance” (co-evolution) is expectedand observed to be strong, and stabilizes the systemof two nearby, massive planets3. There are no mean motion resonances4. The present state lasted since formation period5. Eccentricities in inverse relation to masses, contrary to normal N-body trend tendency for equipartition.Alternative: a lost most massive planet - very unlikely6. Origin still studied, Lin et al. Developed first modelsinvolving time-dependent axisymmetric disk potential
![Page 73: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
Diversity of exoplanetary systems likely a result of:
disk-planet interaction a m? (low-medium) e
planet-planet interaction a m? (high) e
star-planet interaction a m e?
disk breakup (fragmentation into GGP) a m e? metallicity
X
XXX
X X
![Page 74: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
Disk-planet interaction:
resonances and wavesin disks, orbital evolution
![Page 75: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
![Page 76: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
![Page 77: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
.
.
.
SPH (Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics)Jupiter in a solar nebula (z/r=0.02) launches waves at LRs. The two views are (left) Cartesian, and (right) polar coordinates.
![Page 78: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
Inner and Outer Lindblad resonances in an SPH disk with a jupiter
![Page 79: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
![Page 80: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
![Page 81: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
Illustration of nominal positions of Lindblad resonances (obtained by WKB approximation. The nominal positions coincide with the mean motion resonances of the type m:(m+-1) in celestial mechanics, which doesn’t include pressure.) Nominal radii converge toward the planet’s semi-major axis at high azimuthal numbers m, causing problems with torque calculation (infinities!).
On the other hand, the pressure-shifted positions are the effective LR positions, shown by the green arrows. They yield finite total LR torque.
![Page 82: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
Wave excitation at Lindblad resonances (roughly speaking,places in disk in mean motion resonance, or commensurabilityof periods, with the perturbing planet) is the basis of the calculation of torques (and energy transfer) between the perturber and the disk. Finding precise locations of LRs isthus a prerequisite for computing the orbital evolution of a satellite or planet interacting with a disk.
LR locations can be found by setting radial wave numberk_r = 0 in dispersion relation of small-amplitude, m-armed, waves in a disk. [Wave vector has radial component k_r and azimuthal component k_theta = m/r]
This location corresponds to a boundary between the wavy andthe evanescent regions of a disk. Radial wavelength, 2*pi/k_r, becomes formally infinite at LR.
![Page 83: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
LR locations are found from setting k_r = 0 in dispersion relation, which in a Keplerian disk reads (using W for Omega, the angular speed of disk material):
W^2 - m^2 (W - W_p)^2 + c^2 (k_r^2 + m^2/r^2) = 0
where W_p is the pattern speed of waves, e.g. equal to the orbital frequency of the planet if it’s orbit is circular.
In the pre-1993 theories, it was assumed that waves satisfyWKB relationship k_r>>m/r, and so the m^2/r^2 term was neglected, which resulted in the following condition for W(or W_LR):
W_LR = W_p m/(m+-1) (the + sign for OLR, - for ILR).
But can we neglect the azimuthal component of the wave vector?
![Page 84: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
WIND
k
![Page 85: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
Refraction of a density wave in a differentially rotating disk
The wave is launched (at a Lindbladresonance located along the vertical axis)in azimuthal direction, but graduallyrefracts toward a radial, tightening,wave departing to +infinity radially.
r
k
LR
k = wave vector|k| = 2*pi/wavelength
![Page 86: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/86.jpg)
Refraction of a density wave - why the pre-1993 WKB treatment was inaccurate.The wave is launched (at a Lindbladresonance located along the vertical axis)in azimuthal direction, but refracts moreand more toward a radial, tightening,wave departing to r=+ (radially).
r
k ~ m/r
LR
WKB is OK here, because k_r >> m/r
WKBnot good here, because k_r < m/r
k = (k_r, m/r) components of the vector
k~k_r
![Page 87: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/87.jpg)
H=h=z (diskthickness=verticalscale height)
The reason for torque cutoff and the dominanceof eccentricity damping over excitation
OLR: de/dt > 0ILR: de/dt < 0
Wave (with m arms)
Satellite potential (m-harmonic)
(r-a)/h
![Page 88: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/88.jpg)
![Page 89: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/89.jpg)
--> m(z/r)Ecc
entr
icit
y pu
mpi
ng
Eccentricity in type-Isituation is always strongly damped.
![Page 90: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/90.jpg)
Conclusion about eccentricity:
As long as there is some gas in the corotational region(say, +- 20% of orbital radius of a jupiter), eccentricity is strongly damped.
Only if and when the gap becomes so wide that thenear-lying LRs are eliminated, eccentricity is excited.(==> planets larger than 10 m_jup were predicted to be on eccentric orbits (Artymowicz 1992).
In practice, this may account for intermediate-e exoplanets.
For extremely high e’s we need N-body explanation:perturbations by stars, or other planets.
![Page 91: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/91.jpg)
![Page 92: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/92.jpg)
Disk-planet interaction:
numerics
![Page 93: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/93.jpg)
Mass flows through the gapopened by a jupiter-class exoplanet
----> Superplanets can form
![Page 94: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/94.jpg)
Binary star on circular orbitaccreting from a circumbinary disk through a gap.
Surface density Log(surface density)
An example of modern Godunov (Riemann solver) code:PPM VH1-PA. Mass flows through a wide and deep gap!
![Page 95: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/95.jpg)
AMR PPM (Flash) simulation of a Jupiter in a standard solar nebula. 5 levels/subgrids.(P
epli
nski
an d
Ar t
y mow
icz
2 004
)
![Page 96: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/96.jpg)
What does the permeability of gaps teach us about our own Jupiter:
- Jupiter was potentially able to grow to 5-10 m_j, if left accreting from a standard solar nebula for ~1 Myr
- the most likely reason why it didn’t: the nebula was already disappearing and not enough mass was available.
![Page 97: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/97.jpg)
Numerical Troubles:
resolution
grav. softening and zones where torques are ignored
self-gravity of gas (neglected)
gas heating (and other effects)
the usual troubles: boundary conditions, instabilities, unexplained crashes,
the unusual troubles: extreme vortex production and/or variability of flow in some codes
===> Comparison or Test Problem
mini-workshop May 2004 in Stockholm (EU Network on Planet Origins)paper to be submitted Very Soon
(www.astro.su.se/groups/comparison/)
![Page 98: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/98.jpg)
AMRA FARGO
FLASH-AG FLASH-AP
Comparison of Jupiter in an inviscid disk after t=100P
FLASH-AP
![Page 99: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/99.jpg)
RH2DNIRVANA-GD
PARA-SPH
Jupiter in an inviscid disk t=100P
RODEO
![Page 100: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/100.jpg)
Surface density comparison
![Page 101: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/101.jpg)
Disk-planet interaction:
new strange migrationmode
![Page 102: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/102.jpg)
Migration Type I :embedded in fluid
Migration Type II :more in the open (gap)
Ward(1997) (1986,1993)
time
radius
Viscousevolution
![Page 103: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/103.jpg)
Migration Type I :embedded in fluid
Migration Type III partially open (gap)
Migration Type II :in the open (gap)
![Page 104: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/104.jpg)
Type I-III Migration of protoplanets/exoplanets Disks repel planets:
Type I (no gap) Type II (in a gap)
Currently THE problem is: how not to lose planetary embryos (cores) ?
II
I
M/M_Earth
TimescaleWard (1997)
![Page 105: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/105.jpg)
A gap-opening body in a disk: Saturn rings, Keeler gap region (width =35 km)This new 7-km satellite of Saturn was announced 11 May 2005.
To Saturn
![Page 106: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/106.jpg)
Type I-III Migration of protoplanets/exoplanets If disks repel
planets: Type I (no gap) Type II (in a gap)
If disks attract planets: Type III
Q’s: Which way do they
migrate? How fast? Can the protoplanets
survive?
II
I
…....III……..
M/M_Earth
Timescale
![Page 107: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/107.jpg)
Variable-resolutionPPM (Piecewise Parabolic Method)[Artymowicz 1999]
Jupiter-mass planet,fixed orbit a=1, e=0.
White oval = Roche lobe, radius r_L= 0.07
Corotational region outto x_CR = 0.17 from the planet
disk
disk gap (CR region)
![Page 108: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/108.jpg)
Consider a one-sided disk (inner disk only). The rapid inward migration is OPPOSITE to the expectation based on shepherding (Lindblad resonances).
Like in the well-known problem of “sinking satellites” (small satellite galaxies merging with the target disk galaxies),Corotational torques cause rapid inward sinking. (Gas is trasferred from orbits inside the perturber to the outside.To conserve angular momentum, satellite moves in.)
![Page 109: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/109.jpg)
Now consider the opposite case of an inner hole in the disk. Unlike in the shepherding case, the planet rapidly migrates outwards.
Here, the situation is an inward-outward reflection of the sinking satellite problem. Disk gas traveling on hairpin (half-horeseshoe) orbits fills the inner void and moves the planet out rapidly (type III outward migration). Lindblad resonances produce spiral waves and try to move the planet in, but lose with CR torques.
![Page 110: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/110.jpg)
Outward migration type IIIof a Jupiter
Inviscid disk with an inner clearing & peak density of 3 x MMSN
Variable-resolution,adaptive grid (following the planet). Lagrangian PPM.
Horizontal axis showsradius in the range (0.5-5) a
Full range of azimuthson the vertical axis.
Time in units of initialorbital period.
![Page 111: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/111.jpg)
Are there ANY SURVIVORS of type III migration?!
YES!
![Page 112: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/112.jpg)
Edges or gradients in disks:
Magneticcavities aroundthe star
Dead zones
![Page 113: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/113.jpg)
Unsolved problem of the Last Mohican scenario of planet survival in the solar system:
Can the terrestial zone survive a passage of a giant planet?
N-body simulations, N~1000 (Edgar & Artymowicz 2004) A quiet disk of sub-Earth mass bodies reacts to the rapid
passage of a much larger protoplanet (migration speed = input parameter).
Results show increase of velocity dispersion/inclinations and limited reshuffling of material in the terrestrial zone.
Migration type III too fast to trap bodies in mean-motion resonances and push them toward the star
Evidence of the passage can be obliterated by gas drag on the time scale << Myr ---> passage of a pre-jupiter planet(s) not exluded dynamically.
![Page 114: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/114.jpg)
![Page 115: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/115.jpg)
Summary of type-III migration New type, sometimes extremely rapid (timescale < 1000
years). CRs >> LRs Direction depends on prior history, not just on disk properties. Supersedes a much slower, standard type-II migration in disks
more massive than planets Very sensitive to disk density gradients. Migration stops on disk features (rings, edges and/or
substantial density gradients.) Such edges seem natural (dead zone boundaries, magnetospheric inner disk cavities, formation-caused radial disk structure)
Offers possibility of survival of giant planets at intermediate distances (0.1 - 1 AU),
...and of terrestrial planets during the passage of a giant planet on its way to the star.
If type I superseded by type III then these conclusions apply to cores as well, not only giant protoplanets.
![Page 116: Pawel Artymowicz, University of Toronto at Scarborough](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062221/56813cbb550346895da66781/html5/thumbnails/116.jpg)
1. Early dispersal of the primordial nebula ==> no material, no mobility2. Late formation (including Last Mohican scenario)