Pathways for Deep Decarbonization in California...Fo,rma1tions 7 Industry is the sector that is most...

11
Melanie Kenderdine Principal, Energy Futures Initiative Sacramento, CA August 15, 2019 Optionality, Flexibility & Innovation: Pathways for Deep Decarbonization in California ENERGY FUTURES - INITIATIVE - 1

Transcript of Pathways for Deep Decarbonization in California...Fo,rma1tions 7 Industry is the sector that is most...

  • Evolving Energy Realities: Adapting to What’s Next

    Melanie KenderdinePrincipal, Energy Futures Initiative

    Sacramento, CAAugust 15, 2019

    Optionality, Flexibility & Innovation: Pathways for Deep Decarbonization in

    California

    ENERGY FUTURES - INITIATIVE -

    1

  • 17.7

    8.0

    5.0 4.03.6 3.0

    2.01.7

    22.0

    16.0

    9.1

    6.3 5.9 5.9

    1.4 0.7 0.4

    12.8

    7.2 6.75.5 4.3 4.3

    3.6 3.11.0

    8.4

    5.13.9 3.6

    4.5

    0.2 0.20

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25N

    GCC/

    CCUS

    Rene

    wab

    les/

    Up to

    10-

    hr S

    tora

    ge

    Stor

    age/

    NGC

    C H

    ybrid

    s

    Dec

    arbo

    nize

    d Im

    ports

    RNG

    Use

    Rene

    wab

    les/

    5-hr

    Sto

    rage

    H2 D

    opin

    g

    Dem

    and

    Resp

    onse

    LDV

    CAFE

    LDV

    LCFS

    LDV

    Elec

    trific

    atio

    n

    HDV

    CAFE

    HDV

    LCFS

    Low

    er L

    DV

    VMT

    Low

    er H

    DV V

    MT

    Othe

    r VM

    T

    HDV

    AFVs

    CCUS

    Fuel

    -sw

    itch

    to H

    2

    Best

    Man

    agem

    ent P

    ract

    ices

    Auto

    mat

    ion/

    Addi

    tive

    Man

    ufac

    turin

    g

    Fuel

    -sw

    itch

    to N

    atur

    al G

    as

    Biog

    as C

    aptu

    re

    RNG

    Use

    Low

    er F

    ugiti

    ve E

    mis

    sion

    s

    CHP

    Ener

    gy E

    ffici

    ency

    CHP

    Elec

    trific

    atio

    n

    RNG

    Use

    Biog

    as C

    aptu

    re

    Optim

    ize

    Ferti

    lzer

    Redu

    ce F

    uel

    Electricity Transportation Industry Buildings Agriculture

    GHG

    Em

    issi

    ons

    Redu

    ctio

    n Po

    tent

    ial

    (MM

    TCO 2

    e)

    TransportationElectricity Buildings AgricultureIndustrySource: EFI analysis

    GH

    G E

    mis

    sion

    s Red

    uctio

    n Po

    tent

    ial M

    MT

    CO2e

    Electricity68.616%

    Rest of Economy360.884%

    Industry100.423%

    Rest of Economy329.077%

    Agriculture 33.88%

    Rest of Economy395.592%

    Buildings39.49.2%

    Rest of Economy390.090.8%

    Industry: 23% Transportation: 39% Electricity: 16%

    Buildings: 9% Agriculture: 8%

    Source: EFI using data from CARB

    Sectoral Emissions in California, 2016ENERGY FUTURES - INITIATIVE -

    Rest of Economy 259.97

    61%

    2

  • 17.7

    8.0

    5.0 4.03.6 3.0

    2.01.7

    22.0

    16.0

    9.1

    6.3 5.9 5.9

    1.4 0.7 0.4

    12.8

    7.2 6.75.5 4.3 4.3

    3.6 3.11.0

    8.4

    5.13.9 3.6

    4.5

    0.2 0.20

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    NGC

    C/CC

    US

    Rene

    wab

    les/

    Up to

    10-

    hr S

    tora

    ge

    Stor

    age/

    NGC

    C H

    ybrid

    s

    Dec

    arbo

    nize

    d Im

    ports

    RNG

    Use

    Rene

    wab

    les/

    5-hr

    Sto

    rage

    H2 D

    opin

    g

    Dem

    and

    Resp

    onse

    LDV

    CAFE

    LDV

    LCFS

    LDV

    Elec

    trific

    atio

    n

    HDV

    CAFE

    HDV

    LCFS

    Low

    er L

    DV

    VMT

    Low

    er H

    DV V

    MT

    Othe

    r VM

    T

    HDV

    AFVs

    CCUS

    Fuel

    -sw

    itch

    to H

    2

    Best

    Man

    agem

    ent P

    ract

    ices

    Auto

    mat

    ion/

    Addi

    tive

    Man

    ufac

    turin

    g

    Fuel

    -sw

    itch

    to N

    atur

    al G

    as

    Biog

    as C

    aptu

    re

    RNG

    Use

    Low

    er F

    ugiti

    ve E

    mis

    sion

    s

    CHP

    Ener

    gy E

    ffici

    ency

    CHP

    Elec

    trific

    atio

    n

    RNG

    Use

    Biog

    as C

    aptu

    re

    Optim

    ize

    Ferti

    lzer

    Redu

    ce F

    uel

    Electricity Transportation Industry Buildings Agriculture

    GHG

    Em

    issi

    ons

    Redu

    ctio

    n Po

    tent

    ial

    (MM

    TCO 2

    e)

    TransportationElectricity Buildings AgricultureIndustry

    Identified Emissions Reduction Potential of Sector-Specific Pathways for Meeting the 2030 Targets

    Source: EFI analysisSource: EFI analysis

    TransportationElectricity Buildings AgricultureIndustry

    ENERGY FUTURE - INITIATIVE

    3

  • Sectoral GHG Emissions Reductions Achieved by 2030 From Top Two Technology Pathways*

    Electricity68.616%

    Rest of Economy360.884%

    Industry100.423%

    Rest of Economy329.077%

    Agriculture 33.88%

    Rest of Economy395.592%

    Buildings39.49.2%

    Rest of Economy390.090.8%

    Industry: 23%Need 40 MMT reduction by 2030

    Top 2 pathways get halfway there

    Transportation: 39%Need 68 MMT reduction by 2030

    Top 2 pathways get 44% of way there

    Electricity: 16%Need 27 MMT reduction by 2030

    Top 2 pathways get 100% of target

    Buildings: 9%Need 15 MMT reduction by 2030

    Top 2 pathways get 93% of way there

    Agriculture: 8%Need 13 MMT reduction by 2030

    Top 2 pathway gets 35% of the target

    *From 2016 emissions baseline, growth not assumed

    ENERGY FUTURES - INITIATIVE -

    Rest of Economy 259.97

    61%

    4

  • Hourly trends in solar and wind capacity factors in CA for 2017 aligned to normalized variation in hourly load relative to peak daily load

    Over the course of a year large-scale dependence on both wind and solar will result in significant periods requiring very large-scale back-up options

    Source: CAISO data, EFIanalysis

    1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11121314 15 16 17 18 19

    20 21 22 2324 2526 27 2829 30

    31

    323334 35 363738 39 40 4241

    43 44 45 46 4748 49 50 51 53 555457

    52 565958 6463 676566626160

    6

    687069 7271 7374 7675 78 8077 828179 83 84858687888990

    Significant Challenges for Utility Scale Battery StorageChallenges with Integrating Intermittent RenewablesENERGY FUTURES - INITIATIVE -

    Jan

    Feb

    Apr ,,......~ ..,.-

    May

    Jun

    Jul

    Aug

    Sep

    Oct

    5

  • Seasonal Variation in Solar & Wind

    Metered Solar Generation Wind Generation

    1.5 TWh in January

    3.2 TWh in June

    Delta: 1.7 TWh

    0.6 TWh in January

    2.0 TWh in June

    Delta: 1.4 TWh

    Wind/Solar Seasonal Delta Between January and June, 2016

    3.1 TWhSource: EFI, compiled using data from CAISO

    ENERGY FUTURES - INITIATIVE -

    3.5 - 2016

    3.0 - - 2017

    2.5 - 2018

    2.0

    1.5

    1.0

    0.5

    0.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May

    2.5 - 2016

    - - 2017

    2.0 - 2018

    1.5

    1.0

    0.5

    Jun Ju l Aug Se May Jun Ju l Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

    6

  • Industry: Multiple Subsectors, Combustion and Non-Combustion Emissions Require a Range of Pathways

    Industry Sector Energy Consumption by Fuel Type Potential Sequestration Sites for Industrial Facilities

    ENERGY FUTURES - INITIATIVE -

    ENERGY FUTURES - INITIATIVE -

    Distillate Fuel Oil 5%

    Petroleum Coke 4%

    Asphalt & Road Oil 4%

    ..----- Motor Gasoline 2%

    Hydrocarbon Gas Liquids

    1%

    Lubricants & Kerosene

    1%

    Other Petroleum Products

    11%

    + Cement Plants • Ga,s Process,i ng Pia nts ,, O i I 1Refi1n eries

    • Ui l & Gas Reservoirs Saline· Fo,rma1tions 7

  • Industry is the sector that is most difficult to decarbonize. Innovation

    is needed in hydrogen, carbon capture, storage and utilization, and

    biogas.

    Expanded 45Q Tax Credit for Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS), AOTAENERGY FUTURES

    - INITIATIVE -

    Estimated and Measured First-of-a-Kind Costs for CCS Applied to Different Plants

    Cement

    IGCC

    Natural Gas Combined Cycle

    Iron & Steel

    Oxyfuel

    Supercritical P

    So

    Th Th re

    Fertilizer

    Biomass-to-Ethanol

    . $23-33

    I $21-21

    ■ $20-27

    100

    $67-119

    $63-121

    $60-121

    $81-148

    $80-160

    150 $USO Per Ton of CO2

    $104-194

    Tax Credit Value Available for Different Sources and Uses of CO2

    200 -nd indus a s. They -

    0

    Minimum Size of Eligible Carbon Capture Plant by Type {ktCOz/yr)

    al ill~ Type of CO2 Storage/Use 1111■-■ Dedicated Geological 500 100 100 34 36 39 42

    Storage

    Storage via 500 100 100 22 24 26 28 31

    EOR

    Other Utilization 25 25 25 19 22 24 26 28 31 Processes1

    1 Each CO2 source cannot be greater than 500 ktCOifyr 2 Any credit will only apply to the portion of the converted CO2 that can be shown to reduce overall emissions

    8

  • Biogas/Renewable Gas for Decarbonizing Agriculture Sector

    33.8

    20.3

    -4.5

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    2016 Emissions Biogas Capture 2030 Target

    GH

    G E

    mis

    sion

    s (M

    MTC

    O2e

    )

    Utilizing agricultural residues and manure as biogas feedstocks for RNG could provide up to 46.6 Bcf/year of carbon-neutral gas by 2030…Biogas capture also could provide

    emissions reductions and economic benefits to the Agriculture sector ….Diverting methane into a useable product in the form of RNG can have a significant net impact on CO2e levels—potentially reducing the Agriculture sector’s emissions 13 percent by 2030.

    RNG Generation Potential in California (Mcf CH4/year) Biogas Capture Pathway and 2030 Target (MMTCO2e)

    Source: EFI Analysis

    ENERGY FUTURES - INITIATIVE -

    RNG Generation Potential (Mcf CH4/yr) S200 201-400 40 -600

    - 601-800 - >800

    9

  • Meeting the Clean Energy Ministerial’starget of 30 million

    electric vehicle sales by 2030

    would require 314 kt/yr. of cobalt,

    almost three times the 2017 level for all uses. At those

    rates, reserves would last 23 years.

    Carbonbrief.org

    Lithium, Cobalt, Nickel Production/Reserves

    Tesla’s global supply manager for battery metals, told

    a closed-door Washington

    conference of miners, regulators

    and lawmakers that the automaker sees

    a shortage of key EV minerals coming

    in the near future…Tesla will continue to focus more on nickel, part of a plan by Chief Executive

    Elon Musk to use less cobalt in

    battery cathodes.Electrek, May, 2019

    NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION OR CITATION

    10

    Lithium Production/Reserves (metric tons)

    Source: USGS, 2019

    Cobalt Production/Reserves (metric tons)

    Nickel (metric tons)

    ENERGY FUTURES - INITIATIVE -

    al ia

    jnshas.a)

    Madagascar M o r o cco Papua New Guinea Philippines Russi a Sout h AfTica O ther countries

    WDTld total 1-ounded .

    New Caledoni a 1 '° Philippines Russi a South, Africa O t her countri es

    WOTk:I total (1-oun ded)

    40,000

    14,200

    800

    800 869,000

    w

    51 000

    800 500

    1,1600 885 000

    - . . .. . -;-a"•""Jir7"■ - - -. . . ..

    1

    73.000

    2 .200 3.:3 1 0 4 ,600 .5,900 2 .:300

    215. 366. , .214. ,

    48. 1 46.000

    2 , 1 60,000

    90,000

    2 ,300 3 ,200 4 ,600 5 ,900 2 ,200 7 .000

    1 40 000

    2 1 0 ,000 340,000 2 1 0 ,000

    4 4,000 1 80.000

    2 , :300,000

    1 40.000 17.000 56.000

    280,000 250.000

    24.000 640,000

    6 900 000

    4 ,800.000 7 600 000 3 '.700:000 6 . 500.000

    8'9,000,000

    10

  • Breakthrough Technology Portfolio, Post-2030

    Seasonal Storage Direct Air Capture, Large Scale Carbon Management

    Source: EFI Analysis, NREL

    ENERGY FUTURES - INITIATIVE -

    Smart Cities

    Hydrogen from Electrolysis

    Seasonal Storage

    Ir.

    alg Building Performance Technology

    ~ Bioenergy

    Electolyzer + H2 Storage (Power2Gas) + Fe/Generator

    Seasonal Thermal

    High Temp Thermal {CSP)

    Building or Load shifting

    Pumped Hydro

    CAES

    Flow Battery =::J Lead Acid Battery

    Li-Ion Battery

    Flywheels

    Supercapacitors

    Regulat ion load Following

    milliseconds seconds minutes hours

    Seasonal Energy Storage Options

    Energy Shifting

    days months

    i&_ Floating Offshore Wind -0 4 Advanced Nuclear

    lcAPTURE I

    Dilute Sources

    ,1/ I

    -/Q,-o 6 u~ ----- -- - -.,,.. --- --- __.._, Concentrated Sources ,..

    r' r'

    1111 ·~ 111111

    ~ Clean Cement ~fl.-◄ ► .,,.,,, ..... Advanced Photovoltaics

    0 Li-ion Battery Recycling ~ Direct Air Capture

    I UTILIZATION I l sroRAGE I

    Products or Fuels Biological

    -~ ·~ Enhanced Recovery Geologic

    ,. t •-r• -··· --..• • .,•·· ~ ··-•• .... ■ •·

    11

    Slide Number 1Slide Number 2Slide Number 3Slide Number 4Slide Number 5Slide Number 6Slide Number 7Expanded 45Q Tax Credit for Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS), AOTASlide Number 9Slide Number 10Slide Number 11