Patents 2012
-
Upload
nur-amanina -
Category
Documents
-
view
20 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Patents 2012
Slide 1
Patents
Jeremy Wade
Lawyer
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 2 What is a patent?
• Temporary monopoly to exploit an invention
• Governed by the Patents Act 1990 (Commonwealth
legislation)
• Patent rights are not automatic - they must be applied
for and granted
• May be granted for any device, substance, method or
process which is new, inventive/innovative and useful
• Different to copyright, trade marks and registered
designs
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 3 Nature of patent monopoly• National in scope - no global patent
• Length of monopoly - 20 years for standard patents
(extendible to 25 for some pharmaceutical standard
patents) and 8 years for innovation patents, measured
from filing date
• Monopoly may be cut short - patents subject to revocation
• Right to exclude others from exploiting an invention during
the life of the patent
• No guarantee of exploitation - it is subject to prior rights
held by third parties
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 4 Rationale (Venetian Statute (1474))
WE HAVE among us men of great genius, apt to invent and discover ingenious devices... Now, if provision were made for the works and devices discovered by such persons, so that others who may see them could not build them and take the inventor's honour away, more men would then apply their genius, would discover, and would build devices of great utility and benefit to our commonwealth.
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 5 Rationale
• Quid pro quo
• monopoly in exchange for teaching the world the
invention
• Provide opportunity to profit from invention and
thereby encourage investment
• Enables anyone to use the technology once the
patent expires
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 6 Rationale
• On balance society benefits
• granting a limited patent monopoly is better than
inventors keeping their technology secret, potentially
forever (a 'trade secret')
• an infamous example...
• Question: what life-saving technology was kept secret by a
single family for over a century until 1728?
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 7 Rationale
• Answer: the Chamberlens' forceps
• the family practiced obstetrics for generations
• retained monopoly by keeping the invention secret
• blindfolded women in labour;
• ordered all others to leave the room whilst using the secret
invention; and
• otherwise kept the forceps in a sealed box.
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 8 Two types of patents in Australia
• Standard
• Innovation
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 9 Standard patent
• 20 year term (up to 25 years for certain
pharmaceutical patents)
• Unlimited number of claims
• Examined only after paying the examination fee
• Usually take 2 to 4 years from filing to grant
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 10 Innovation patent
• Available only in Australia
• For inventions that are not sufficiently inventive to meet the inventive threshold required for standard patents
• Maximum term of 8 years
• Maximum 5 claims
• Application only examined for compliance with formal requirements before it is registered
• Usually granted within 1 to 3 months
• Cannot be enforced against an alleged infringer unless it has been examined for substantive compliance- i.e 'certified'
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 11 Parts of a patent
• Specification - fully describes the invention, including the best method known to the applicant of performing the invention and generally includes figures (diagrams)
• Claims - define the boundaries of the patented monopoly
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 12 Example: Patent No. 702534
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 13 The Specification
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 14 Figure 1
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 15 Extract from the specification
• Figure 1 shows, in very diagrammatic form, a latch assembly 1
incorporating one embodiment of the invention which is shown
mounted in an edge of a door 2. The assembly 1 includes a latch
bolt 3 which is movable between an extended latching position,
as shown, and a retracted position in which the head 4 of the bolt
3 is at least substantially contained within the assembly casing 5.
A spring 6 urges the bolt 3 towards the latching position, and the
bolt 3 can be withdrawn into the retracted position by operation of
either an inner actuator 7 or an outer actuator 8. In that respect,
"inner" and "outer" respectively relate to the inner side and the
outer side of the door 2 relative to the space to which access is
controlled by the door 2.
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 16 The claims (claim 1)
• A latch assembly including,
• [(i)] a casing,
• [(ii)] a latch bolt mounted on the casing so as to be movable relative thereto between an extended latching position and a retracted release position,
• [(iii)] a first actuator operable from an inner side of the assembly to cause movement of the latch bolt to said release position,
• [(iv)] locking means operable from said inner side of the assembly to adopt an active condition and thereby render said first actuator inoperable,
• [(v)] a second actuator operable from an outer side of the assembly to cause movement of the latch bolt to the release position, and
• [(vi)] lock release means which is responsive to said operation of the second actuator so as to thereby render said locking means inactive.
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 17 Example: patent application 2011201639
- Scaling documents on a touch-screen
display
• 1. A computer-implemented method, comprising: at a device with
a touch screen display:
• displaying at least a first portion of an electronic document at a first
magnification;
• detecting a gesture on or near the touch screen display corresponding to a
command to zoom in by a user-specified amount;
• displaying decreasing portions of the electronic document at increasing
magnifications, in response to detecting the gesture; and
• displaying a respective portion of the electronic document at a predefined
magnification if, upon detecting termination of the gesture, the
magnification exceeds the predefined magnification.
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 18 Example: application 2011201639 - Scaling
documents on a touch-screen display
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 19 Example: Innovation patent application
2001100012 (NOT certified)
• A transportation facilitation device including:-
• [i] a circular rim;
• [ii] a bearing in which a hollow cylindrical member is rotatable
about a rod situated within the hollow cylindrical member; and
• [iv] a series of connecting members connecting the circular rim
with the hollow cylindrical member to maintain the circular rim and
the hollow cylindrical member in substantially fixed relation;
wherein
• [v] the rod is positioned on an axis perpendicular to the plane of
the circular rim, and substantially central of the circular rim.
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 20 Example: Innovation patent application
2001100012 (NOT certified)
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 21 Who may apply for a patent?
• The actual inventor(s), or
• Any other person(s) entitled to ownership, such as an
assignee(s), or
• An employer where the invention was devised in the
course of employment
• UWA v Gray
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 22 Applying for a Patent
• Lodge a complete or provisional patent application
• If a provisional application, must file a complete application within 12 months
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 23 Applying for a Patent - Examination
• File with patent office
• Request examination
• Examiner conducts investigation of the merits of the application
• Objections are raised and answered (may require amendment)
• If accepted it is advertised
• Anyone who claims that the patent should not be granted can file
a notice of opposition
• If no-one opposes, or opposition overcome, the patent will be
granted
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 24 Patentability requirements• Must:
• be patent eligible subject matter (be a manner of
manufacture within the meaning of section 6 of the
Statute of Monopolies); AND
• be novel (new); AND
• be inventive (standard patent) or innovative
(innovation patent); AND
• be useful;
• Not have been secretly used in Australia before the
priority date with the patentee's authorisation
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 25 Section 6 Statute of Monopolies 1623
“[Monopolies prohibited except] letters patent…
of the sole working or making of any manner of
new manufactures… to the true and first
inventor… ".
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 26 National Research Development Corp. v
Commissioner of Patents (1959)
• An artificially created state of affairs in the field of
economic endeavour
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 27 Subsequent decisions- patentable
subject matter• An artificial state of affairs, in the sense of a
concrete, tangible, physical, or observable effect,
which cannot be peripheral or subordinate to the
substance of the invention
• The transfer of legal rights of ownership or
entitlement is not physical
• An unpatentable invention does not become
patentable merely by performing one or more
steps on a computer
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 28 What is patentable- technology neutral
• Products
• Chemical compounds
• Genetically altered life forms
• Methods of use
• Manufacturing processes
• The application of computer software and algorithms
• Business methods
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 29 The Wright Brothers' Flying Machine
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 30 Hills Hoist
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 31 Victa Lawn Mower
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 32 Polaroid Camera
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 33 Cochlear Hearing Aid
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 34 What is not patentable?
• Mere ideas
• Mathematical formulae
• Human beings and biological processes for their
generation
• Artistic creations
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 35 Grant v The Commissioner of Patents
• Invention was an asset protection method involving the
following elements:
• establishing a trust having a trustee,
• the owner making a gift of a sum of money to the trust,
• the trustee making a loan of said sum of money from the trust
to the owner, and
• the trustee securing the loan by taking a charge for said sum
of money over the asset.
• Not patentable as it did not produce a concrete,
tangible, physical, or observable effect
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 36 Must be New and Inventive/Innovative
• Must be novel (new)
• Must involve an inventive step (not obvious) or
an innovative step
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 37 Background concepts• Person skilled in the art - uninventive skilled worker in
the field
• Priority date - the date the patent is filed or possibly the
date of filing of an earlier related application
• Prior art - information in a document made publicly
available or information made publicly available through
doing an act (anywhere in the world*) before the priority
date
• Common general knowledge - background knowledge to
the person skilled in the art
*for patents filed after April 2002
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 38 Novelty (new)
• "Novel" relative to the "prior art base"
• This means that it was not publicly disclosed before the priority date
• By a single piece of prior art (i.e. document or act) or
• By two or more pieces of prior art that would be treated as a single piece of prior art by a person skilled in the relevant art
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 39 Inventive step (not obvious) - standard
patents only• "Inventive" relative to the prior art base
• Not inventive if an obvious next step:
• to a person skilled in the art
• in light of the common general knowledge as it
existed before the priority date considered on its own
or
• in combination with 1 or more pieces of prior art that
the person skilled in the art would have ascertained,
understood and regarded as relevant
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 40 Innovative step - innovation patents
only
• An innovative step will be found if the invention
which is claimed differs from the prior art base
such that any difference identified in the
invention as claimed makes a substantial
contribution to the working of that invention
• Irrelevant whether the identified difference is
obvious
• Irrelevant whether the identified difference is
slight
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 41 Other requirements
• Is useful - the invention must achieve what has
been promised in the specification
• Note on "Raising the Bar" reforms: additional
requirement for specification to describe "specific,
substantial and credible use" will apply to all
applications where examination is requested after 14
April 2013
• Was not secretly used in the patent area before
the priority date
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 42 Example - Dura-Post v Delnorth
• Claim 1:
“A roadside post comprising an elongate body formed of
sheet spring steel and having a longitudinal axis, a
transverse axis transverse to said longitudinal axis, a
front face and a rear face, said front and rear faces
transversely extending generally parallel to said
transverse axis, wherein said body is elastically
bendable through 90 degrees from an unbent state
about said transverse axis.”
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 43 Example - Dura-Post v Delnorth
• One piece of prior art (known as the “Supaflex Guide Post”)
embodied all of the features of claim 1, except that the
Supaflex Guide Post was constructed of a plastics material,
whereas the claim was directed to roadside posts “formed of
sheet spring steel”.
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 44 Example - Dura-Post v Delnorth
• The court held that claim 1 was novel over the Supaflex
Guide Post
• The court held that claim 1 defined an innovative step
over the Supaflex Guide Post
• The question was not whether the substitution of steel for
plastic resulted in a better roadside post
• The question was not whether it was obvious to make the
Supaflex Guide Post using sheet spring steel instead of a
plastics material
• The question was whether the use of sheet spring steel
contributed to the working of the roadside post
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 45 Example - Dura-Post v Delnorth
• The court held the utility requirement was satisfied
• The object of the invention was stated to be “to substantially
overcome or at least ameliorate one or more of the
disadvantages of the prior art”
• Identified disadvantages of prior art were:
• Prior steel posts were generally not resilient, plastically deforming
upon impact, and had to be manually restraightened
• Timber posts would fracture on impact
• Plastic or plastic/rubber composite posts deteriorated due to UV
exposure and repeated impacts over time
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 46 Infringement - patentee's rights
• A patentee has the exclusive rights to exploit, and to
authorise others to exploit, the patented invention
• Two types of patent infringement:
• Primary or direct infringement; and
• Secondary or indirect infringement
• Patentees (and exclusive licensees) can commence
court proceedings for patent infringement to enforce
their patent rights
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 47 Primary infringement
• Primary infringement occurs when a person
"exploits" the patented invention without the
patentee's authorisation
• Intent is irrelevant for primary infringement
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 48 Primary infringement - exploit
• "Exploit" in relation to an invention, includes:
(a) Products — make, hire, sell or otherwise dispose
of the product, offer to make, sell, hire or otherwise
dispose of it, use or import it, or keep it for the
purpose of doing any of those things; or
(b) Method or process — use the method or process
or do any act mentioned in paragraph (a) in respect
of a product resulting from such use
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 49 Secondary infringement (s 117)• If the use of a product by a person would infringe a patent,
the supply of that product by one person to another is an
infringement of the patent by the supplier unless the supplier
is the patentee or licensee of the patent
• Use has the following meanings:
• (a) if the product is capable of only one reasonable use, that use; or
• (b) if the product is not a staple commercial product – any use of the
product, if the supplier had reason to believe that the person would
put it to that use; or
• (c) in any case – the use of the product in accordance with any
instructions or inducement given to the person by the supplier or
contained in an advertisement published by or with the authority of
the supplier.
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 50 Infringement - issues
• Requires the taking of all essential parts of the
invention (i.e. all essential integers of a claim)
• Construction of claims hotly contested
• Words given the meaning:
• which the person skilled in the art would attach to
them
• in the light of common general knowledge and what
disclosed in the body of the specification
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 51 Revocation
• Not a manner of new manufacture
• Not novel
• Does not involve an inventive/innovative step
• Not Useful
• Secretly used
• Claims not 'fairly based'
• Note on "Raising the Bar" reforms: new more onerous 'support'
requirement will apply to all applications where examination is
requested after 14 April 2013
• Obtained by fraud, false suggestion or misrepresentation
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 52 Remedies available to a patentee
• Interlocutory injunction - preserve the status quo
• Final injunction - permanently stop infringement
• Delivery up - hand over or destruction of
infringing goods
• Damages or an account of profits
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 53 Practical issues for inventor
• Keep invention secret until application filed
• Seek advice of a patent attorney
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Slide 54
Patents
Jeremy Wade
Lawyer
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________