Participatory Budgeting – Southampton’s experience ‘Your Health, Your Community, Your Vote’...
-
Upload
vivian-gunnin -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Participatory Budgeting – Southampton’s experience ‘Your Health, Your Community, Your Vote’...
Participatory Budgeting – Southampton’s experience
‘Your Health, Your Community, Your Vote’
28th June 2008
The context Southampton’s New Deal for
Communities programme
£48.7m to spend over 10 years
Led by a partnership board
Delivered according to themes
Thornhill Community Health Group funding Joint initiative with Southampton City
PCT to build a new health clinic in Thornhill
NDC return on funding for health clinic - £100,000 a year for 10 years
Overseen by Thornhill Community Health Group – PCT, Southampton City Council, Thornhill Plus You, residents
Participatory budgeting - timescales
December 2006 – idea first discussed in Thornhill
February 2007 – agreement from Community Health Group to develop PB
June 2007 – PB planning day with representative from the PB Unit
January 2008 – Agreement from Southampton City Council and Southampton City PCT to go ahead
March 2008 – Southampton named as one of 10 pilots
June 28th, 2008 – ‘Your Health, Your Community, Your Vote’ event
Stakeholders
SCC and local PCT, Thornhill Plus You, residents
Staff time, resources for the event, approval for spending money this way
Some suspicion at first Public involvement agenda used as
leverage Named by Hazel Blears – no going
back!
Objectives for the pilot Empower local groups to bid for
money for and manage health related projects
Increase resident participation in decision making which should be both engaging and enjoyable
Establish processes and accountability lines that are clear, concise and productive
Develop effective support and project planning mechanisms (e.g. monitoring, establishment of criteria and use of qualitative feedback from residents)
Test new ways of involving communities in managing resources and transferring this knowledge to other neighbourhoods
The process
Applications invited for projects bidding from £1,000-£10,000, which have health objectives
22 applications received, totalling £134,168.00
Applications subject to a brief appraisal
The event
18 presentations, 3 minutes long Projects on the day totalled £93,559 Transport and childcare provided Lunch and entertainment Prize draw linked to evaluation forms 60 residents attended Local dignitaries – Councillors, local
Sergeant, John Denham MP Media coverage
Project Total Score Funding £
Crafty Crafters 218 2,000
Anti-bullying Programme 206 5,000
Our Lives, our health, improving our life chances 197 5,853
Summer Fun! 196 1,423
Looking out for me 186 3,600
Water Walkers 179 1,345
Health Kicks 176 5,000
Street Sport 176 8,650
Eyes on Thornhill 173 8,000
The Star Project 171 9,764
Teen Pregnancy Show 169 3,825
Sun Safety 168 1,000
Sprint Start Healthy Kids Programme 166 7,580
Healthier Options 166 1,000
REACH Thornhill 165 7,550
EMPOWERing You! 139 9,409
Community Building Family Links 135 9,500
Keep Fit today! 134 3,060
Resources
£10,000 provided to fund the event Task group set up to oversee
organisation of the day Appraisal team Support for applicants Approximately 500 hours involved
Evaluation – residents responses
‘I think it was good for the Thornhill community. I wish I had it when I was young, I have lived here for 44 years.’
‘well done, do it again’
‘ I think it’s important for the general public to have a say in these projects’
‘Big thanks for making my vote count’
Resident’s responses…
‘We need more of this type of event’
‘It was good to see the faces behind the projects’
‘A good day for everyone who attended’
‘More events like this please!’
‘Why has it taken us so long to hit on this way of doing things??!! Well done – a great success!!’
Applicants responses‘It was a privilege to participate. We got
to speak to real people. Now we know the community are keen on the idea, it has given us confidence.’
Action for Blind People
‘A very fair approach that fits into the NHS vision of people having a say. It was fair and transparent.’
Sun Safety
‘Not a fair way to allocate funding. Process is open to abuse, especially if large amounts of funding are at stake.’
Unsuccessful project
‘Really good fun, would definitely do it again. It was nerve-wracking but a very friendly atmosphere.’
Water Walkers
‘It was a remarkable experience, I enjoyed the challenge. I can’t express how impressed I was, this is the first time I’ve seen a community participation project that was successful.’
YMCA
My evaluation of the day
People are generally suspicious of this approach
Good organisation is crucial to the success of the day
Don’t forget about having fun! Don’t get too bogged down with
issues around representation – what is the alternative?
Transparency of the process