Participatory Budgeting in Seattle?

6
Participatory Budgeting for Street Maintenance in Seattle, WA (US) Coursera “Engaging Citizens: A Game Changer for Development?” Final Project -- Digital Artifact Brian Hsi

Transcript of Participatory Budgeting in Seattle?

Page 1: Participatory Budgeting in Seattle?

Participatory Budgeting for Street Maintenance in

Seattle, WA (US)Coursera “Engaging Citizens: A Game Changer for Development?”Final Project -- Digital ArtifactBrian Hsi

Page 2: Participatory Budgeting in Seattle?

Background● Approximately 950 miles of streets in Seattle

have no adjoining sidewalks

● Funding for sidewalk enhancements is set to expire in 2015

● Seattle will be moving to district elections in 2015

● In addition to sidewalks, a significant number of potholes still need to be filled*

Seattle districts in the 2015 election http://www.seattle.gov/Images/Clerk/DistrictsMap.jpg

*Up to date map on potholes filled or to be filled http://web6.seattle.gov/sdot/potholemap/

Page 3: Participatory Budgeting in Seattle?

As Seattle moves to district elections, why not allocate some funding for street maintenance (sidewalks, potholes,

etc.) towards participatory budgeting?

Page 4: Participatory Budgeting in Seattle?

How does this work?

● Citizen advisory boards (Pedestrian, Bike, etc.) need to be engaged

● Neighborhood Councils need to be engaged

● City Council members need to introduce municipal code changes based on citizen input

● Mayor needs to sign

Foundational work Participatory budgeting

Dis

trict

ele

ctio

ns h

eld

● District residents determine funding priorities

● District residents also serve as “sensors” gathering needs assessments

● Department of Transportation (and other agencies) serve as subject matter experts for residents

Implementation

● Department of Transportation completes work (or not)

● City Council Member works with City departments to ensure the work gets done, provide transparency, etc.

Page 5: Participatory Budgeting in Seattle?

Risks and mitigations

Well off areas (from a sidewalk, pothole, infrastructure perspective) continue to outpace other areas less well off

Limit the program only to those areas in most dire need of improvements

Determine funding to districts based on overall need

Only those districts with robust social infrastructure to organize will benefit

Use established Neighborhood Councils (or de facto proxies) as the central point of organizing

POSSIBLE RISKS POTENTIAL MITIGATIONS

Page 6: Participatory Budgeting in Seattle?

Measuring for successHow do we know if the participatory budgeting exercise is successful? Here are a few metrics to consider:

● Completed projects -- an initial baseline will be established, and this will be compared with historical data of completion of projects in a given district.

● Time for completion -- again, an initial baseline will be established and compared against historical data.

● Percentage of residents engaged in the process -- an initial baseline will be established to see how this percentage changes over time

● Tenure of council member -- this will be an indirect measure at best, but there is a relationship of the ability of the council member to get something accomplished and their support from district residents