Partially Supported by Inter-RPO WG – NESCAUM F ast A erosol S ensing T ools for N atural E vent T...
-
date post
20-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Partially Supported by Inter-RPO WG – NESCAUM F ast A erosol S ensing T ools for N atural E vent T...
Partially Supported by Inter-RPO WG – NESCAUMFast Aerosol Sensing Tools for Natural Event Tracking FASTNET
CAPITA
September 2004
Natural Aerosol Event Detection and Characterization
Contents• Background, Objectives and and Approach
• Direct Evidence of Natural Aerosol Events
• Event Definition: Time Series Approach
• Origin of US Dust Events
• Fine Dust Concentration Pattern
• FAST-CATT: EUS Dust Transport Events
• Regional PM25 Time Pattern AIRNOW (2003-2004)
Background, Objectives and and Approach to the Analysis
Background • There is considerable evidence that smoke from biomass fires and windblown dust constitutes a
significant component of the PM25 and PM10 over the US.• There is a rich pool of research on smoke and dust but the contributions are fragmented, and
uneven in spatial, temporal an compositional coverage.
Objective• Quantify the the spatio-temporal and chemical pattern of dust and smoke over the US• Identify and possibly quantify the local and origin of NAM dust and smoke
Approach • This natural aerosol analysis applies integrative analysis along several dimensions:
– Access, organize and share historical and recent aerosol-relevant data for the community– Combine surface, satellite data, relevant to emissions, transport and effects– Participate in open, collaborative projects to conduct integrative analysis
Status (Sep. 2004)• The analysis of natural aerosols over the US begun at CAPITA in 2000. Since then several funded projects have supported
aspects of the analysis. Current (2004) activities support the development of collaboration technologies (NSF), haze regulations (RPO) and the use of satellite data (NASA). The natural aerosol pattern/source analysis progressing well but the collaboration with the community has been marginal.
Aerosol Types and their Events: Dust, Smoke and Haze
• Aerosol are composed of multiple types including urban-industrial sulfates, nitrates and organics (industrial haze), biomass smoke and windblown dust and others.
• Each type may be considered a different pollutant since it has its own class of sources, aerosol properties and it is associated with different effects.
• Current regulation lump the different aerosol species into two size classes PM2.5 and PM10, regardless of their composition in each size range.
• In this sense dust, smoke and haze aerosols (PM25 and PM10) are equivalents to an array of gaseous pollutants, such as SO2, NOx and CO
• The assessment of PM25 and PM10 aerosols can only be accomplished through a full understanding of the component species and their interaction
• This analysis assesses the dynamic, event-characteristics of sulfate, organic, dust and nitrate aerosols and their statistical interaction in producing PM25 events.
Regional Haze Rule: Nomenclature and Time Scale Schematics
Temporal ComponentsHistorical condition, pre 2000 status
Baseline condition, established in 2000-2004
Current condition, on 2000-2064 trajectory
Natural condition, absence of human aerosol
Haze ComponentsNatural haze is due to natural windblown dust, biomass smoke and other natural processes
Man-made haze is due industrial activities AND man-perturbed smoke and dust emissions
A fraction of the man-perturbed smoke and dust is assigned to natural by policy decisions
Regulatory ComponentsGoal is to attain natural conditions by 2064;
Establish baseline during 2000-2004
First SIP & Natural Cond. estimate in 2008;
SIP & Natural Cond. revisions every 10 yrs
Natural Aerosol Analysis Goals
Natural Haze (this Project, COHA)
• Spatially resolve natural (dust, smoke, other), focus on Class I areas
• Temporally resolve natural haze components for each day
Current Conditions (VIEWS, RPO Projects)
• Spatially resolved haze components, focus on Class I areas
• Temporally resolve aerosol components for each day
• Identify worst/best visibility days for total aerosol
Natural-Total Haze Apportionment (this & other RPO projects)
• Estimate the natural-manmade contribution on best/worst visibility days
• Thus, Current Conditions and the Natural Conditions need to be quantified simultaneously. Thus, coordination with other work is essential.
Observational Tools Establishing Aerosol Origin
Direct Evidence
Spatial Pattern Wind Pattern
Composition Temporal Pattern
Trajectory
Modern Methods – similar to century-old approaches but with more data
• Direct Evidence. Photographic, satellite or compelling visual evidence of origin
• Aerosol Composition. Chemical fingerprinting of different source types (speciation, traces)
• Temporal pattern. Chemical rPhysical property analysis (satellite, ASOS, PM2.5)• Spatial Pattern. Chemical
• Transport Pattern. Forward, backward trajectory, residence time analysis • Chemistry with Transport. Combining chemical fingerprinting and transport (CATT)
• Dynamic modeling. Simulation model (forward, inversion) quantifying origin/transport
Historical Methods
• Source attribution methods have been used for the past 2 centuries
• A list of methods was given my Egen, 1835. See paper and PPT
Natural Aerosol Conditions – Default Values• The Regional Haze Rule provides initial default values for the Natural Haze Conditions
• The default haze for the West is 8 deciviews while for the East is 11 deciviews
• Obtained by estimating the natural concentration of SO4, EC, OC, NO3, Fine, Coarse Soil
• Weighing each aerosol component by corresponding extinction efficiencies. (Trijonis, 1990)
Mass
West East
Regulatory objective: Fortify the natural condition estimates by the 2008 SIP call.
Regional Haze Guide on Fire and Dust
Fire• Forest and other fires can be either natural or man-induced
• Many major forest fires can be inherently classified as natural
• Other fires are intentional (prescribed) to reduce organic fuel accumulation
• Prescribed burning will likely be increasing to reduce catastrophic wildfires
• EPA considers some portion of the prescribed fire emissions as ‘natural’.
• The Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP) is conducting interesting policy discussions on defining natural and manmade smoke
Dust• Regional Haze guide document is vague on natural dust
• A WRAP RPO study has concluded that windblown dust, not manmade fugitive (mechanically stirred up) dust dominated regional dust.
• Pitchford suggests that a working definition of natural dust could be any dust from non-disturbed soil surfaces; dust from disturbed surfaces would be manmade.
• Clearly, there is a need to begin both the scientific/technical as well as the policy discussion about natural/manmade dust.
Aerosol Events Catalog
• Aerosol events catalog is community-based
• Each cataloged event has location, time and type codes
• Software tools allow event submission and browsing
• Events are described in flexible user-supplied URLsDust Events
Haze Events
Smoke Events
FASTNET Aerosol Event Catalog
Aerosol Event Catalog: Astronaut Photos
• Astronauts routinely photograph dust and smoke events
• The images and the catalog is on the NASA JSC website
• Aerosol images are registered in the DataFed Catalog and web-accessible through standard VIEWER interface
Aerosol Event Catalog: Web pages
• Catalog of generic ‘web objects’ – pages, images, animations that relate to aerosol events
• Each ‘web object’ is cataloged by location, time and aerosol type.
Temporal Pattern Regional Speciated Analysis - VIEWS
• Aerosol species time series:– ammSO4f– OCf– ECf– SOILf– ammNO3f– RCFM
Regions of Aggregation
Dust
Seasonal + spikes
East – west events are independent
East events occur several times a year, mostly in summer
West events are lest frequent, mostly in spring
US
West
East
Sulfate
EUS Daily Average
50%-ile, 30 day 50%-ile smoothing
Deviation from %-ile
Event – Deviation > percentile value
Median Seasonal Conc.
Mean Seasonal Conc.
Eastern US PM25 Event Composition
• The largest EUS PM25 events (as RCFM) are simultaneously ‘events’ in sulfate, organics and soil!
• Some EUS PM25 events are single species events
• Some PM25 events are not events in any species; their reinforcing combination causes the PM25 event
Origin of Fine Dust Events over the US
Gobi dust in springSahara in summer
Fine dust events over the US are mainly from intercontinental transport
Fine Dust Events, 1992-2003ug/m3
Daily Average Concentration over the US
Dust is seasonal with noise
Random short spikes added
Sulfate is seasonal with noiseNoise is by synoptic weather
VIEWS Aerosol Chemistry Database
Dust Event DetectionAverage Fine Soil, Measured
- 0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
01/01/92 05/15/93 09/27/94 02/09/96 06/23/97 11/05/98 03/19/00 08/01/01 12/14/02
Fin
e S
oil
Co
nc.,
ug
/m3
Average Fine Soil, Events
- 0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
01/ 01/ 92 05/ 15/ 93 09/ 27/ 94 02/ 09/ 96 06/ 23/ 97 11/ 05/ 98 03/ 19/ 00 08/ 01/ 01 12/ 14/ 02
Fin
e S
oil
Co
nc.
, u
g/m
3
Average Fine Soil, Events Removed
- 0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
01/01/92 05/15/93 09/27/94 02/09/96 06/23/97 11/05/98 03/19/00 08/01/01 12/14/02
Fin
e S
oil
Co
nc.,
ug
/m3
Plot of the daily avg. fine SOIL
- Baseline with strong seasonality
- Events superimposed on baseline
Separate event days from baseline
- Identify spike (event) days
- Subtract baseline to get event ‘excess’
Determine concentration baseline
- Use ‘spike filter’ to remove outlier
- Declare remaining data as ‘baseline’
Seasonal Pattern of Dust Baseline and Events
• The dust baseline concentration is has a 5x seasonal amplitude from 0.2 to 1 ug/m3• The dust events (determined by the spike filter) occur in April/May and in July• The two April/May and the July peak in avg. dust is due to the events
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
01/01/92 02/20/92 04/10/92 05/30/92 07/19/92 09/07/92 10/27/92 12/16/92
EventsBaselineTotal
Seasonal Average Fine Soil (VIEWS database, 1992-2002)
• Fine soil concentration is highest in the summer over Mississippi Valley, lowest in the winter• In the spring, high concentrations also exists in the arid Southwest (Arizona and Texas)
• Evidently, the summer Mississippi Valley peak is Sahara dust while the Spring peak is from local sources
Annual Average Fine Dust Concentration (VIEWS database, 1992-2002)
• The highest annual fine dust concentration is in southern Arizona and Texas
• Elevated dust is also evident in the Mississippi Valley
TOMS and VIEWS, July
• TOMS – Dust plume from Sahara • VIEWS SOILf in July – Sahara dust plume penetrating the continent
Local Dust
• Dust Storm Damage, 19030-1940 Dust Bowl States (brown), most dust storm damage (red), less damage (yellow).
• Dust frequency based on visibility obs. – Sehmel (1975?)
Example high fine dust days (See console for complete list)
Asian DustApril 16, 2001
Sahara DustJuly 5, 2001
Southwestern Dust
Oct. 16, 2001