Part of a presentation given at the Canadian Nutrition Society Conference
description
Transcript of Part of a presentation given at the Canadian Nutrition Society Conference
Part of a presentation given at the Canadian Nutrition Society Conference
Manon Laporte PDt, MScJune 2013
Validated Nutrition Screening Tools (for hospital use)
Simple Screening Tools (# 1 & # 2)
Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST)
Mini Nutritional Assessment – Short Form (MNA-SF)
Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002)
Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST)
Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ)
Screening Tools
Parameters Criterion Validity
Weight loss BMI
Appetite/Food intake
Others Gold Standard Sensitivity Specificity
Simple Screeningtools 1998#1#2
Albumin
In-depth assessment by dietitians(2 studies) 75%
92%75%69%
MST 1999 SGA (4 studies) 74%-93% 76%-93%
MNA-SF© 2001
Psycho. stress
Acute diseaseNeuropsycho. problems
Mobility
- Dietitian assessment
- SGA- Full MNA (4 studies)
93%
100%
64%-96%
38%
52.8%
89%-100%
NRS 2002 Severity of disease
SGA (5 studies) 62% - 90% 83.3%-93%
MUST 2003 Acutely ill SGA (4 studies) 61%-87.1% 78.6%-93%
SNAQ © 2005
Use of :Supplemental
drinks orTube feeding
% Weight loss & BMISGA (2012)
79%
79%
83%
90.3%
Screening Tools
Reliability(inter-rater) Kappa Score
Simple / Easy to use? Limits
Screening Tools 1998 # 1
#2
0.600.76 ±
• Calculation of % weight loss• Laboratory parameter
MST 1999 0.84 – 0.93 Yes
• Eating poorly: only because appetite & No time frame of eating poorly
• Validity 93% - developmental study
MNA-SF© 2001 Not reported No
• Low specificity • For elderly population only• Too comprehensive
NRS 2002 0.67 No• Low sensitivity• Too detailed(% of food intake and weight loss)
MUST 2003 Not reported ±
• Calculation of % weight loss in specific time frames
• Same BMI range for adult and elderly populations
SNAQ © 2005 0.69 – 0.91 ± Yes
• No acceptable reference standard (EAL-ADA 2011)
• Decrease appetite over the last month…