Part #2 of 3

WISE SoE data flows

River water quality

Lake water quality

Groundwater quality

Water quantity *

Emissions to water *

+ biology

+ biology

Plan

Adjust

Iterate

no WISE SoEdata flows

in 2014-2015 ?

WISE SoE review and upgrade towards WISE 2.0

• Content Review of the WISE SoE data flows against upcoming WFD reporting in 2016

• Technical Review of QA/QC of data flows to develop more efficient processes between EEA and Member Countries,including feedback mechanisms

Why ?

PlanExecute

AdjustEvaluate

Iterate

www.eionet.europa.eu/dataflows

3

2

1

0

Timeliness & completeness

WISE SoE 2012

2013 0 1 2 3 Total

3 0 0 16 33 49

2 6 12 45 7 70

1 3 42 5 2 52

0 13 3 3 2 21

Total 22 57 69 44 192

WISE SoE data flows1.7 1.8

here in 2012 there in 2013

WaterQuantity 2012

2013 0 1 2 3 Total

3 2 2

2 3 3 6

1 3 25 28

0 1 2 3

Total 4 30 3 2 39

Water quantity *1.1 1.2

Only EUROSTAT/OECD JQ 2012Incomplete spatial coverageIssues with spatial units / aggregationIssues with temporal aggregation

from ground truth to Waterbases…

End of E-PRTR

Setup collection Run collection Finalise collection Process + Analyse Disseminate

End reporting Last delivery

Publication

Adjust

Iterate

How ?

Prioritise data collectionMust have…

Data needed for core indicators, planned assessments, existing and planned data products. Data needed as input to other reporting obligations (e.g. WFD, the Eurostat/OECD Joint Questionnaire)…

Shouldhave…

Data to improve the thematic | spatial | temporal coverage and resolution of data obtained through other data flows (e.g. EU directives reporting).

Couldhave…

Won’thave…

Input data not directly traceable to an existing or planned data product or need.Or redundant data in different data flows…

…same as before, if and only if it doesn’t prevent us from collecting the data we really need.

i.e. reduce reporting burden

An example with WFD reporting Must !

Section 9.2 and 9.3 introduce the possible use of WISE SoE information for emissions and water abstraction to replace WFD requirements when the data is reported under WISE SoE

An example with emissions…? Should ?

? Could ?? Must ?

Prioritise data processingMust do…

Upon delivery, process the available data for the update of indicators, Waterbases, map services and interactive data and map viewers. Also applies data consumed by other entities (e.g. Eurostat, ENV).

Shoulddo…

Coulddo…

Won’t Do not process data with severe Quality Issues that whereflagged upon delivery by the automated QC routines …

… but provide “human” interaction and feedback to improve the data deliveries.

As soon as required, process data for planned assessments(which typically needs to be tailored or post-processed).

As soon as possible, process ad-hoc data requests.But, preferably, make all data available for download. And/or through well-documented APIs.

Waterbases

Groundwater

Water Quantity

Emissions

Rivers + biology

Lakes + biology

BWD

DWD

UWWTD

WFD

Floods

Standardise, document and reuse:

Concepts and vocabularies

Data modelsCode lists

Spatial units

ProcessesFormatsServices

Waterbases

Groundwater

Water Quantity

Emissions

Rivers + biology

Lakes + biology

BWD

DWD

UWWTD

WFD

Floods

Small steps towards services…

time

WFDWFDalignment…

WISE SoE

WISE SoE

2020…compliance

Monitoring stations

Nutrients

Hazardous substances

Biology

Pressures

Characterisation of thespatial unit

Rivers Lakes GW Emissions

INSPIRE Environmental Monitoring Facilities

ISO 19156:2011 Observations and Measurements

Questions?Feedback?

Part #3 of 3

Fernanda Nery

2.0

HP DevOps Maturity Model

Build digital services, not websites5.

https://www.gov.uk/design-principles

time

2020

Build digital services, not websites

Our service doesn’t begin and end at our website.

We need to design for that, even if we can’t control it. And we need to recognise that some day, before we know it, it’ll be about different digital services again.

5.

https://www.gov.uk/design-principles

Questions?Feedback?