Parex – 2017 carbon footprint - Skalflex PDF/Parex_carbon...Parex carbon footprint 2017 10 Group...
Transcript of Parex – 2017 carbon footprint - Skalflex PDF/Parex_carbon...Parex carbon footprint 2017 10 Group...
© 2
017
Ca
rbo
ne
4
Parex – 2017 carbon footprint
Final results
September 2017
Juliette DECQ Alexandre FLORENTIN
© 2
017
Ca
rbo
ne
4
2 2
P A R E X C L I M A T E P R O G R A M C a r b o n F o o t p r i n t A s s e s s m e n t
Low carbon impact products (ex: EIFS)
Projects helping local communities to adapt
to climate change and regenerate
ecosytems in main countries of operations
Carbon footprint assessment
§ Bilan Carbone
update for France and Carbon Footprint assessment with other Parex countries
§ Identify reduction opportunities (suppliers, freight)
Reduce from a business perspective
§ Procurement
strategy § suppliers
engagement § alternative intrants § freight optimization § industrial operations
improvement
Reduce from an individual perspective employees initiatives
and involvement
MEASURE REDUCE ADAPT & MITIGATE ACTIVATE
Raise awareness among employees
Federate subsidiaries
on a common ambition
Implement a responsible
procurement strategy
Become a pioneer in sustainable construction
© 2
017
Ca
rbo
ne
4
Words of context
3
� In 2017, Parex had the ambition to increase the scope of countries covered by the carbon footprint exercise. After France, China and the USA in 2016, 10 countries undertook a carbon footprint assessment in 2017:
§ Australia, Thailand and Singapore
§ Denmark, UK and Spain
§ Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay and Uruguay
� All together, these countries account for 91% of Parex revenues worldwide.
� The carbon footprint exercise focused on the significant sources of GHG emissions for Parex business sector: Energy, Purchases, Freight and Travels.
© 2
017
Ca
rbo
ne
4
« Upstream Scope 3 » « Scopes 1 & 2 » « Downstream Scope 3 »
Methodological focus: carbon accounting Different sources of emissions defining the three “scopes”
Upstream activities Company’s activities Downstream activities
Company’s car fleet
Buildings Fossil fuels consumption Electricity consumption
Refrigerant gas leakages
Upstream freight
Travel Business travel
Commuting employees
Customers and visitors travel
Downstream freight
Purchases (Purchase of goods
and services)
Capital assets (fixed assets: buildings, vehicles, IT equipment
…)
Use of sold products
End of life Of sold products
Wastes produced
Main sources of emissions of a carbon footprint and associated French regulatory obligations
Please note that the following sources (which apply for specific activities) are not represented in the figure: investments, franchises (downstream) and leased assets (upstream). The upstream of fossil fuel is not represented neither.
BEGES regulation (+ Art. 173) (French law)
Scope 3: specific to Art. 173 regulation (French law)
Scope 3: specific to Art. 173 regulation (French law)
4 June 2017 Consolidated proposal
© 2
017
Ca
rbo
ne
4
« Upstream Scope 3 » « Scopes 1 & 2 » « Downstream Scope 3 »
Methodological focus: carbon accounting Sources taken into account for Parex carbon footprint
Upstream activities Company’s activities Downstream activities
Company’s car fleet
Buildings Fossil fuels consumption Electricity consumption
Refrigerant gas leakages
Upstream freight
Travel Business travel
Commuting employees
Downstream freight
Purchases (Purchase of goods
and services)
Main sources of emissions of a carbon footprint and associated French regulatory obligations
Please note that the following sources (which apply for specific activities) are not represented in the figure: investments, franchises (downstream) and leased assets (upstream). The upstream of fossil fuel is not represented neither.
BEGES regulation (+ Art. 173) (French law)
Scope 3: specific to Art. 173 regulation (French law)
Scope 3: specific to Art. 173 regulation (French law)
5 June 2017 Consolidated proposal
© 2
017
Ca
rbo
ne
4
Key messages
6
� The data collection was very good thanks to the participation of all countries
� For all countries, materials and freight emissions account for around 90% of total emissions
� Freight emission weight compared to total emissions varies significantly accross countries. A specific action plan could be drawn for freight in order to improve the measurement of emissions and decrease emissions over time.
� The carbon intensity of production spread between 730 kgCO2eq/tonne produced to 250 kgCO2eq/tonne produced.
§ This diversity can mostly be explained by how much cement countries buy to manufacture 1 tonne of final product.
§ However, for many countries, freight and energy emission differentiate the carbon footprint profile and enable to draw specific action plans for each country.
© 2
017
Ca
rbo
ne
4
7
Parex Carbon Fooprint 2017 Final results
Performance indicators
Countries’ results
Annexes
Group results
© 2
017
Ca
rbo
ne
4
Data collection
8
Were all the needed data collected?
Perimeter of data collection
§ Overall, almost all data were collected
§ For the UK, missing data in the freight tab (the average distance is missing for outgoing freight)
UK Denmark Spain Thailand SingaporeEnergy OK OK OK OK OKMaterials OK OK OK OK OKPackaging OK OK OK OK OKFreight Missing data OK OK OK OKTravel OK OK OK OK OK
Australia Brazil Argentina Paraguay UruguayEnergy OK OK OK OK OKMaterials OK OK OK OK OKPackaging OK OK OK OK OKFreight OK OK OK OK OKTravel OK OK OK OK OK
© 2
017
Ca
rbo
ne
4
191 600
48 300
190 800
7 700 3 000 11 900 33 300
75 600
21 800
72 200 55 500
4 700 1 700
37 700
18 000
53 700
12 400 6 800
20 100
23 300
55 200 47 200
-
50 000
100 000
150 000
200 000
250 000
300 000
Fra
nce
USA
Chi
na
UK
De
nma
rk
Spa
in
Tha
iland
Sing
ap
ore
Aus
tra
lia
Bra
zil
Arg
ent
ina
Para
gua
y
Uru
gua
y
Europe Asia and Pacific Latin America
Energy Materials Packaging Freight Travel
Parex carbon footprint 2017
9
Group result: 1 MtCO2eq
Parex carbon footprint – 2017 – emissions by country and GHG sources Unit: tCO2eq
1 MtCO2eq
1300 tCO2eq/M€ revenues / compared to 1700 tCO2eq/M€ for the cement industry
385 kgCO2eq/tonne produced
13 countries
55% by FR, China and USA
2016 results
© 2
017
Ca
rbo
ne
4
Parex carbon footprint 2017
10
Group results: weight of specific emission sources
Parex carbon footprint – 2017 – weight of emission sources by country Unit: % of tCO2eq
� For all countries, freight and materials acount for around 90% of total emissions.
� Freight emissions weight almost half of Spain, Brazil, Argentina and Australia carbon footprint exercice.
1% 4% 2% 4% 2% 2% 2% 5% 5% 3% 7% 7% 5%
79% 65% 71% 82%
71%
46%
76% 72%
44% 53% 48%
82% 77%
3%
4% 5%
7%
5%
1%
3% 3%
2% 2% 3%
4% 5%
15% 24% 20%
4% 19%
48%
16% 19%
48% 41% 41%
7% 14%
3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100% Fr
anc
e
USA
Chi
na
UK
De
nma
rk
Spa
in
Tha
iland
Sing
ap
ore
Aus
tra
lia
Bra
zil
Arg
ent
ina
Para
gua
y
Uru
gua
y
Europe Asia and Pacific Latin America
Energy Materials Packaging Freight Travel
© 2
017
Ca
rbo
ne
4
11
Parex Carbon Fooprint 2017 Final results
Performance indicators
Countries’ results
Annexes
Group results
© 2
017
Ca
rbo
ne
4
731
490 486 480 413 389 385 380 378 372
304 280 275 250
Australia
Spain
Thaila
nd
China - 20
16
Argentin
a
USA -
2016
Pare
x gro
up ave
rage
UK
Brazil
Singapore
Para
guay
France -
2016
Uruguay
Denmark
Performance indicators
12
Carbon intensity of production: how to explain the differences?
Parex carbon footprint – 2017 – carbon intensity of production Unit: kgCO2eq / tonnes produced
� There is an important diversity (factor 3) regarding the production carbon intensity of countries.
� How can this diversity be explained?
© 2
017
Ca
rbo
ne
4
731
490 486 480 413 389 385 380 378 372
304 280 275 250
Australia
Spain
Thaila
nd
China - 20
16
Argentin
a
USA -
2016
Pare
x gro
up ave
rage
UK
Brazil
Singapore
Para
guay
France -
2016
Uruguay
Denmark
Performance indicators
13
The main driver of diversity is caused by materials emissions
Parex carbon footprint – 2017 – carbon intensity of production Unit: kgCO2eq / tonnes of production
ENERGY Carbon intensity of production
Energy kgCO2eq/tonnes of production
MATERIALS Carbon intensity of production
Materials kgCO2eq/tonnes of production
FREIGHT Carbon intensity of production
Freight kgCO2eq/tonnes of production
Main driver of production carbon intensity diversity
Minor driver of diversity, except for Australia, Singapore, Argentina and
Paraguay
Minor driver of diversity, except for Australia, Spain, Argentina and Brazil
32
10 11 9 13
29
20 16
10
22
4
16 8
Australia
Spain
Thaila
nd
China - 20
16
USA -
2016
Argentin
a
Singapore
UK
Brazil
Para
guay
France -
2016
Uruguay
Denmark
Carbon intensity of production - ENERGY
Unit : tCO2eq energy / ktonnes 323
222
74 96 95 167
71 14
150
20 43 38 46
Australia
Spain
Thaila
nd
China - 20
16
USA -
2016
Argentin
a
Singapore
UK
Brazil
Para
guay
France -
2016
Uruguay
Denmark
Carbon intensity of production - FREIGHT
Unit : tCO2eq freight / ktonnes
352
244
373 341
202 254
314
207 268 253 220 216 175
Australia
Spain
Thaila
nd
China - 20
16
Argentin
a
USA -
2016
UK
Brazil
Singapore
Para
guay
France -
2016
Uruguay
Denmark
Carbon intensity of production - MATERIALS
Unit : tCO2eq materials / ktonnes
© 2
017
Ca
rbo
ne
4
373 352 341 314 268 254 257 253 244 220 216 207 202 175
Thaila
nd
Australia
China - 20
16
UK
Singapore
USA -
2016
Pare
x Gro
up ave
rage
Para
guay
Spain
France -
2016
Uruguay
Brazil
Argentin
a
Denmark
Carbon intensity of production - MATERIALS Unit : kgCO2eq materials / tonnes produced
Zoom on materials purchased
14
The diversity is caused by the weight and emission factor of cement
ZOOM on MATERIALS
ZOOM on FREIGHT
ZOOM on ENERGY
1 Weight of cement in products 2 Cement average emission factor
377
256 290 320 248 227
275 213
149 205 234
145 176
Thaila
nd
Australia
China - 20
16
UK
Singapore
USA -
2016
Para
guay
Spain
France -
2016
Uruguay
Brazil
Denmark
Argentin
a
Cement intensity of production Unit : tonnes of cement / ktonnes produced
924 1 063 994 915 1 019 803 724
916 866 865 810 975 893
Thaila
nd
Australia
China - 20
16
UK
Singapore
USA -
2016
Para
guay
Spain
France -
2016
Uruguay
Brazil
Denmark
Argentin
a
Average emission factor of cement Unit : kgCO2eq / tonnes of cement
� All countries above average have a high cement intensity of production and/or a high cement emission factor
© 2
017
Ca
rbo
ne
4
323
222 167 150
97 96 95 74 71 46 43 38 20 14
Australia
Spain
Argentin
a
Brazil
Pare
x Gro
up ave
rage
China - 20
16
USA -
2016
Thaila
nd
Singapore
Denmark
France -
2016
Uruguay
Para
guay UK
Carbon intensity of production - FREIGHT Unit : kgCO2eq/tonnes produced
Zoom on freight
15
The average distance of freight is the main explanation of the weight of freight emissions compared to total emissions
1 Average distance travelled for incoming and outgoing freight (tonnes.km incoming freight / tonnes of materials purchased ; tonnes.km outgoing freight / tonnes produced)
ZOOM on MATERIALS
ZOOM on FREIGHT
ZOOM on ENERGY
� All countries above average have a high average distance travelled for incoming and/or outgoing freight
208
416 255
595
222
735
78 150 140 64 43
908
400 445
145 303
136 101 200 147
56 31
Australia Spain Argentina Brazil China - 2016 Singapore Denmark France - 2016 Thailand Uruguay Paraguay
Average distance for incoming and outgoing freight in km
Average km - incoming freight Average km - outgoing freight
© 2
017
Ca
rbo
ne
4
32 29
22 20 16 16 13 12 11 10 10 9 8
4
Australia
Argentin
a
Para
guay
Singapore
Uruguay UK
USA -
2016
Pare
x Gro
up ave
rage
Thaila
nd
Spain
Brazil
China - 20
16
Denmark
France -
2016
Carbon intensity of production - ENERGY Unit : tCO2eq energy / ktonnes
50
102 78 69
52 31 21 29
43 38
12 29 22
Australia
Argentin
a
Para
guay
Singapore
Uruguay
USA -
2016
Thaila
nd
Spain
Brazil
UK
China - 20
16
Denmark
France -
2016
Energy intensity of production Unit : kWh energy / tonnes
Zoom on energy
16
The diversity is caused by the energy intensity and emission factor
ZOOM on MATERIALS
ZOOM on FREIGHT
ZOOM on ENERGY
1 Energy intensity of production Countries with on-site sand drying 2 Energy average emission factor
647
288 279 294 302 432
533
338 226
414
713
271 164
Australia
Argentin
a
Para
guay
Singapore
Uruguay
USA -
2016
Thaila
nd
Spain
Brazil
UK
China - 20
16
Denmark
France -
2016
Energy average emission factor Unit : kgCO2eq/MWh consummed
� All countries above average have a high energy intensity of production and/or average emission factor
© 2
017
Ca
rbo
ne
4
Zoom on energy
17
Focus on sand drying
65% 89% 66% 79% 17%
Natural gas
GPL
Natural gas
88% 100%
12%
Energy used for sand drying / total energy consumption
Source of energy used for sand drying
� The major issue with sand drying is to improve the energy efficiency of dryers
GPL
100%
184
94 89 87 63 55
Brazil Paraguay Argentina Singapore France - 2016
Uruguay
Sand drying energy efficiency Unit : kWh drying / tonnes of sand
81%
GPL
100%
© 2
017
Ca
rbo
ne
4
18
Parex Carbon Fooprint 2017 Final results
Performance indicators
Countries’ results
Annexes
Group results
© 2
017
Ca
rbo
ne
4
Carbon footprint project - ParexGroup Europe
19
© 2
017
Ca
rbo
ne
4
20
Key indicators Main recommendations
kgCO2eq/tonne produced
tCO2eq/M€ revenues
250 330 � Materials: reduce the average
emission factor of cement / work on material composition of products to decrease cement weight
© 2
017
Ca
rbo
ne
4
21
Key indicators Main recommendations
kgCO2eq/tonne produced
tCO2eq/M€ revenues
490 1800 � Freight: get local suppliers for incoming materials / optimize incoming freight
� Freight: work with outgoing freight subcontractors to optimize freight process / reduce travel distance / improve fuel efficiency
© 2
017
Ca
rbo
ne
4
22
Key indicators Main recommendations
kgCO2eq/tonne produced
tCO2eq/M€ revenues
380 320 � Energy: supply from low-carbon energy sources
� Freight : measure the tonnes.km of outgoint freight (missing data)
© 2
017
Ca
rbo
ne
4
23
Parex Carbon Fooprint 2017 Results
Performance indicators
Countries’ results
Annexes
Group results
© 2
017
Ca
rbo
ne
4
Parex carbon footprint 2017
24
The weight of revenues generally match the weight of CO2 emissions
Parex carbon footprint – 2017 – comparison of weight of emissions and weight of revenues per country
22% 29%
7%
11%
25%
22% 1%
4%
0%
2%
3%
2%
4%
3% 10%
6% 5%
5% 13%
7%
10% 9%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
CO2 emissions - 2017 Revenues - 2017
Uruguay
Paraguay
Argentina
Brazil
Australia
Singapore
Thailand
Spain
Denmark
UK
China - 2016
USA - 2016
France - 2016
© 2
017
Ca
rbo
ne
4
Zoom on materials purchased Carbon intensity of cement
25
1063 1019 975 924 916 915 893 865 810 724
Weight of cement type per country (in %) and Cement average emission factor (in kgCO2e/tonnes of cement)
FE C
EM I
GRE
Y
kgC
O2e
q/t
on
ne
s)
26%
2%
100%
4% 0% 2% 7% 17%
0% 66%
0%
4%
98% 96%
19%
98% 78%
70%
15%
100% 77%
6%
100%
15%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Australia Singapore Denmark Thailand Spain UK Argentina Uruguay Brazil Paraguay
Cement purchase - GREY cement - CEM V
Cement purchase - GREY cement - CEM IV
Cement purchase - GREY cement - CEM II
Cement purchase - GREY cement - CEM I
Cement purchase - WHITE cement - CEM II
Cement purchase - WHITE cement - CEM I
26%
2%
100%
4% 0% 2% 7% 17%
0% 66%
0%
4%
98% 96%
19%
98% 78%
70%
15%
100% 77%
6%
100%
15%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Australia Singapore Denmark Thailand Spain UK Argentina Uruguay Brazil Paraguay
Cement purchase - GREY cement - CEM V
Cement purchase - GREY cement - CEM IV
Cement purchase - GREY cement - CEM II
Cement purchase - GREY cement - CEM I
Cement purchase - WHITE cement - CEM II
Cement purchase - WHITE cement - CEM I
26%
2%
100%
4% 0% 2% 7% 17%
0% 66%
0%
4%
98% 96%
19%
98% 78%
70%
15%
100% 77%
6%
100%
15%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Australia Singapore Denmark Thailand Spain UK Argentina Uruguay Brazil Paraguay
Cement purchase - GREY cement - CEM V
Cement purchase - GREY cement - CEM IV
Cement purchase - GREY cement - CEM II
Cement purchase - GREY cement - CEM I
Cement purchase - WHITE cement - CEM II
Cement purchase - WHITE cement - CEM I
26%
2%
100%
4% 0% 2% 7% 17%
0% 66%
0%
4%
98% 96%
19%
98% 78%
70%
15%
100% 77%
6%
100%
15%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Australia Singapore Denmark Thailand Spain UK Argentina Uruguay Brazil Paraguay
Cement purchase - GREY cement - CEM V
Cement purchase - GREY cement - CEM IV
Cement purchase - GREY cement - CEM II
Cement purchase - GREY cement - CEM I
Cement purchase - WHITE cement - CEM II
Cement purchase - WHITE cement - CEM I
1 094 1 017 871 919 979 913 940 940 855 940
Australia Singapore Denmark Thailand Spain UK Argentina Uruguay Brazil Paraguay
© 2
017
Ca
rbo
ne
4
Zoom on energy
26
Energy mix by country
Energy mix per country (in %) and Energy supply average emission factor (in kgCO2e/kWh consumed)
713 647 533 432 414 338 302 294 271 164 226 279 288
FE e
lec
tric
ity a
nd
oth
er e
nerg
ies
kgC
O2e
q/M
Wh
)
80% 52%
79% 66% 74%
15% 20% 35% 46%
9% 19% 4%
52%
0%
22%
0% 0%
16%
0% 13%
0% 0% 86%
22%
92% 11%
0% 10% 0% 34% 0%
79% 63%
3%
34%
0%
53%
0%
30% 20% 16% 21%
0% 10% 6% 4%
62%
19% 4% 6% 4% 7%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
100%
China - 20
16
Australia
Thaila
nd
USA -
2016
Spain
Singapore
Argentin
a UK
Denmark
Uruguay
Brazil
Para
guay
France -
2016
Energy mix by countries - %
% of electricity % of GPL % of natural gas % of fuel
932 807 585 554 551 529 431 354 324 320 307 305 272 244 111 82
Australia
China - 20
16
Thaila
nd UK
Singapore
USA -
2016
Argentin
a
Spain
Domesti
c fuel
Para
guay
Uruguay
Denmark
GPL
Natura
l gas
Brazil
France -
2016
81% 56%
80% 66%
36%
78%
13% 15% 20% 5%
46% 20%
54%
0%
16% 0%
0%
0%
12%
81%
0% 9%
89% 0%
16%
8%
0% 10% 0% 34%
3%
0% 0%
79% 66%
0%
34% 57% 31%
19% 17% 20% 0%
62%
10% 6% 5% 5% 5% 19% 6% 7%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
100%
China - 20
16
Australia
Thaila
nd
USA -
2016
UK
Spain
Uruguay
Singapore
Argentin
a
Para
guay
Denmark
Brazil
France -
2016
Energy mix by countries - %
% of electricity % of GPL % of natural gas % of fuel