Parallel sunspot counts with SDO/HMI · 2014. 5. 21. · intensitygram -> Magigram) • Counted at...
Transcript of Parallel sunspot counts with SDO/HMI · 2014. 5. 21. · intensitygram -> Magigram) • Counted at...
![Page 1: Parallel sunspot counts with SDO/HMI · 2014. 5. 21. · intensitygram -> Magigram) • Counted at 1K resolution • Published daily at STAR ( using the last image set of the previous](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071508/6128df6e106c4c14be4373fb/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Parallel sunspot counts withSDO/HMI
Jan Alvestad4th SSN Workshop, Locarno, May 2014
![Page 2: Parallel sunspot counts with SDO/HMI · 2014. 5. 21. · intensitygram -> Magigram) • Counted at 1K resolution • Published daily at STAR ( using the last image set of the previous](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071508/6128df6e106c4c14be4373fb/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Why compare? Initial considerations
Does adding magnetic information to intensitygrams have any effect on sunspotcounts?
How much does group splitting affect the counts?
Assumptions Using the same observer for both counts will decrease differences in
observer counting practices and bias to a minimum
Expected results No major differences between the counts When the counts are different, group splitting will account for most of the
differences
![Page 3: Parallel sunspot counts with SDO/HMI · 2014. 5. 21. · intensitygram -> Magigram) • Counted at 1K resolution • Published daily at STAR ( using the last image set of the previous](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071508/6128df6e106c4c14be4373fb/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Method and data
1. Count sunspots from Magigrams.
• Based on SDO HMIIF/HMIB 4K resolution composite (magnetointensitygram -> Magigram)
• Counted at 1K resolution• Published daily at STAR
(http://solen.info/solar) usingthe last image set of theprevious day
• From Oct.1 2013 added a countat 12 UT
• Data interval: 2012.1 - 2014.4
![Page 4: Parallel sunspot counts with SDO/HMI · 2014. 5. 21. · intensitygram -> Magigram) • Counted at 1K resolution • Published daily at STAR ( using the last image set of the previous](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071508/6128df6e106c4c14be4373fb/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Method and data
2. Count sunspots from flattenedintensitygrams.
• SDO HMIIF 1K resolution• Data interval: 2012.1 - 2014.3• Lagging method 1 count by at least
one month to eliminate memoryeffects
![Page 5: Parallel sunspot counts with SDO/HMI · 2014. 5. 21. · intensitygram -> Magigram) • Counted at 1K resolution • Published daily at STAR ( using the last image set of the previous](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071508/6128df6e106c4c14be4373fb/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Results - groups
More groups observed in magigrams, on average17.7% more than for intensitygrams
Increasing differenceswhen the 90 day solar flux (1 AU) is at or above150
![Page 6: Parallel sunspot counts with SDO/HMI · 2014. 5. 21. · intensitygram -> Magigram) • Counted at 1K resolution • Published daily at STAR ( using the last image set of the previous](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071508/6128df6e106c4c14be4373fb/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Results – groups by hemisphere
Northern hemispheregroups on a slowlydecreasing trend withsimilar development for both magigrams and intensitygrams
Quick increase in southern hemispheregroups from October2013.
![Page 7: Parallel sunspot counts with SDO/HMI · 2014. 5. 21. · intensitygram -> Magigram) • Counted at 1K resolution • Published daily at STAR ( using the last image set of the previous](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071508/6128df6e106c4c14be4373fb/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Results - spots
Accumulated spots per monthdevelops similarlyfor both counts, again withincreasingdifferences from Oct.2013
On average 19.7% more spots usingmagigrams
![Page 8: Parallel sunspot counts with SDO/HMI · 2014. 5. 21. · intensitygram -> Magigram) • Counted at 1K resolution • Published daily at STAR ( using the last image set of the previous](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071508/6128df6e106c4c14be4373fb/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Results – spots by hemisphere
Split by hemispherethe magigram countis similar or a littlehigher than for intensitygrams most months until Oct.2013
30% fewer spots for intensitygrams thelast months
![Page 9: Parallel sunspot counts with SDO/HMI · 2014. 5. 21. · intensitygram -> Magigram) • Counted at 1K resolution • Published daily at STAR ( using the last image set of the previous](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071508/6128df6e106c4c14be4373fb/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Results – spots / group ratios
The spot / groupratio was mostly a little higher for theintensitygrams untilFeb.2013, after thenthe magigrams have mostly been higher
![Page 10: Parallel sunspot counts with SDO/HMI · 2014. 5. 21. · intensitygram -> Magigram) • Counted at 1K resolution • Published daily at STAR ( using the last image set of the previous](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071508/6128df6e106c4c14be4373fb/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Results – monthly ratios
No significant trend until December2013, since then a larger differencebetween the counts
Small spots make up a larger part of themagigram count withincreasing solar flux
![Page 11: Parallel sunspot counts with SDO/HMI · 2014. 5. 21. · intensitygram -> Magigram) • Counted at 1K resolution • Published daily at STAR ( using the last image set of the previous](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071508/6128df6e106c4c14be4373fb/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Why are there differences?
Image comparison: Enhancedvisibility (contrast) of small spots (spot area 1-7 microhemispheres)
During the 12 hour span for theimage example a total of 8 new ARsemerged on the complete visible disk. This was the second such rapid magnetic intensification event in May. The count increased by 6 groups. Another 24 hours later several of the initial groups haddecayed to a spotless state.
Group splitting / non-splitting is mucheasier to get right with magneticpolarity information.
2014.05.13 23:45 UT2014.05.13 12:00 UT
![Page 12: Parallel sunspot counts with SDO/HMI · 2014. 5. 21. · intensitygram -> Magigram) • Counted at 1K resolution • Published daily at STAR ( using the last image set of the previous](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071508/6128df6e106c4c14be4373fb/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Conclusions
HMIIF+HMIB composite enhances the visibility of small spots. An observer can be much more confident that a small spot is a spot and not noise with both visual and magnetic evidence.
Magigrams extends observed lifetime of active regions. Facilitateslifetime tracking of active regions (observes small spots both at initial region formation and in decaying flux)
Uniform counting of small spots whether located inside a larger region or by themselves. This results in more groups with only one or a fewpenumbra spots and a significantly higher number of groups thanAAVSO and WDC-SILSO reports
Incorrect splitting choices account for a larger part of the differenceswhen there is complex clustering of groups. Enhanced visibility of smallspots and a larger proportion of small spots compared to the total number of spots causes significant differences between the counts at solar max.
![Page 13: Parallel sunspot counts with SDO/HMI · 2014. 5. 21. · intensitygram -> Magigram) • Counted at 1K resolution • Published daily at STAR ( using the last image set of the previous](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071508/6128df6e106c4c14be4373fb/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Addendum 1: Example comparison with Locarno
Minor non-splitting problem, still better than several other observers. NOAA reported only3 ARs in the same area later the same day, with 155/S3406 becoming AR 12059 2-3 dayslater when the spot was pushed into the southern hemisphere
Locarno May 8, 20145 groups in this relativelycomplex area
Impossible to tell ifinterpretation is correctusing only SDO HMIIFimage
The only problem with theLocarno interpretation is thatgroup 155 is two groups(same polarity spots).
![Page 14: Parallel sunspot counts with SDO/HMI · 2014. 5. 21. · intensitygram -> Magigram) • Counted at 1K resolution • Published daily at STAR ( using the last image set of the previous](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071508/6128df6e106c4c14be4373fb/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Addendum 2: Does it matter which count we use?
Low sampled counts can be compared to high sampled counts on timescales of onesolar rotation or more. Taking this into account counts are surprisingly similar during periods of low to moderate activity and only diverge when SF > 140