Parallel Operation of Extended Boost Quasi Z- Source Inverters for … · 2015. 9. 11. · usable...
Transcript of Parallel Operation of Extended Boost Quasi Z- Source Inverters for … · 2015. 9. 11. · usable...
Parallel Operation of Extended Boost Quasi Z-
Source Inverters for Photovoltaic System
Applications
Ali Zakerian and Daryoosh Nazarpour Department of Electrical Engineering, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran
Emails: [email protected], [email protected]
Abstract—Nowadays, more and more distributed
generations and renewable energy sources, such as wind,
solar and tidal power, are connected to the public grid by
the means of power inverters. They often form microgrids
before being connected to the public grid. Due to the
availability of high current power electronic devices, it is
inevitable to use several inverters in parallel for high-power
and/or low-cost applications. So, inverters should be
connected in parallel to provide system redundancy and
high reliability, which are important for critical customers.
This paper presents a new structure based on combination
of extended-boost quasi z-source converters and parallel
inverters to increase the output voltage in a wide range,
usable in photovoltaic (PV) systems. Additionally, the
proposed inverter has all the advantages of parallel power
converters. The proposed topology and its performances are
validated using simulation results which are obtained in
Matlab/Simulink. 1
Index Terms—voltage gain, parallel operation, Z-source
inverter (ZSI), extended boost quasi Z-source inverter
(EBQZSI), modulation index
I. INTRODUCTION
In recent years, due to energy crisis, renewable energy
sources, such as wind, photovoltaic (PV) and fuel cell are
becoming more popular in industrial and residential
applications. Today, PV cells are used in many
applications due to the advantages like less maintenance,
free from pollution and zero fuel cost [1]. Standalone
solar modules are commonly used for house hold lighting,
street lighting, etc. Large scale solar generating stations
are being installed for supplying power to utility grid. Fig.
1 and Fig. 2 show the structure of photovoltaic systems
and the equivalent circuit of a solar cell, respectively. A
photovoltaic module is formed by connecting many solar
cells in series and parallel. In PV generation, power
converter interface is the major part in the overall system.
Power converter topologies employed in the PV power
generation systems are mainly characterized by two- or
single-stage inverters. The single-stage inverter is an
attractive solution due to its compactness, low cost, and
reliability. However, its conventional structure must be
oversized to cope with the wide PV voltage variation
Manuscript received January 7, 2015; revised April 14, 2015.
derived from changes of irradiation and temperature. The
two-stage inverter topology applies a boost dc/dc
converter to minimize the required kilovoltampere rating
of the inverter and boost the wide-range input voltage to a
constant desired output value. However, the switch in the
dc/dc converter will increase the cost and decrease the
efficiency [2].
The Z-source inverter (ZSI) presents a new single-
stage structure to achieve the voltage boost/buck
character in a single power conversion stage, which has
been reported in applications to PV systems [3]. The ZSI
has gained popularity as a single-stage buck-boost
inverter topology among many researchers. However, its
boosting capability could be limited and therefore it may
not be suitable for some applications requiring very high
boost demanding of cascading other dc-dc boost
converters. This could lose the efficiency and demand
more sensing for controlling the added new stages.
Over the recent years, many researchers have given
their focus in many directions to develop ZSI to achieve
different objectives [3]-[10]. A new family of extended
boost quasi ZSI (EBQZSI) proposed to fill the research
gap left in the development of ZSI [11]. The most
important profits of this topology are increasing output
voltage in a wide range and its expandability as that for
each added new stage the boost factor can be increased
by a constant factor.
LO
AD
DC/AC
Inverter
DC/DC
Converter
PV array
VpvVdc Vo
Figure 1. The structure of photovoltaic systems.
Iph
Id Ish
RshVd
I Rs
V
Figure 2. Equivalent circuit of a solar cell.
On the other hand, many industrial systems demand a
reliable power supply. One way to increase the reliability
International Journal of Electronics and Electrical Engineering Vol. 4, No. 1, February 2016
©2016 Int. J. Electron. Electr. Eng. 17doi: 10.18178/ijeee.4.1.17-23
is to increase the number of sources. Another way to
increase the reliability is to have parallel inverters and
this would increase the redundancy as well as the
maintainability of the inverters. Moreover, the parallel
connected inverters effectively offer a significantly
higher level of availability than conventional approaches.
Commercially available ratings range from several kVA
to hundreds of kVA. Parallel connection techniques for
inverters have been gaining increasing attentions in
motor-drive systems, converter systems, and distributed
generation systems [12]-[16].
Paralleled inverters can be built in numerous ways.
First and the most obvious way is to have independent
inverters with separate dc sources [17] and the other
possibility is to connect the inverters into a common dc
source [18]. First method is common as it is simple.
However, it requires more than one power source. In the
context of Z-source inverter, this method requires more
than one independent Z-source impedance network.
Therefore, this paper proposes a new hybrid structure
based on EBQZS converters and parallel inverters which
share one dc-input voltage to increase the output voltage
in a wide range which is not limited to the dc-output
voltage of the PV array.
The main point in this study is proposing a structure in
order to link the PV dc-output voltage to the load, and for
this reason the PV array is substituted with a DC source.
This paper is started with a short summary about
EBQZSI and its different types in Section II. Operating
principles and the equivalent circuit of the proposed
topology are presented in Section III. Section IV presents
the simulation results and finally, conclusions are drawn
in Section V.
II. EXTENDED BOOST QUASI Z-SOURCE INVERTER
TOPOLOGIES
Extended Boost Quasi Z-Source (EBQZS) converter as
z-source converter can utilize shoot-through (short circuit)
states to boost the dc-bus voltage by gating on both the
upper and lower switches of a phase leg. There are four
topologies for EBQZSI in [11]. These topologies can be
mainly categorized as diode assisted boost or capacitor
assisted boost and can be further divided into continuous
current and discontinuous current topologies. All these
topologies can be modulated using the modulation
methods proposed for the original ZSI. The other main
advantage of these topologies is their expandability. This
was not possible with the original ZSI, i.e. if one needs to
increase the boosting range, another stage can be
cascaded at the front end without increasing the number
of active switches. Fig. 3, Fig. 4, Fig. 5 and Fig. 6 show
the diode assisted boost and capacitor assisted boost,
respectively. All figures are drawn for the second
extension of these structures.
All the topologies show higher boost and lower voltage
stress across the capacitors compared to those of
traditional ZSI. The following equations are obtainable
according to Fig. 7(a) that shows the first extension of the
capacitor assisted extended boost discontinuous current
quasi Z-source inverter. This converter has three
operating states similar to those of the traditional ZSI
topology. For simplicity, it can be simplified into shoot-
through and nonshoot-through states.
VinVdc
L3 L2 L1D2 D1
C3
C2
C1
LOAD
C4
D4L4
D3
D5
Figure 3. Diode-Assisted extended-boost continuous-current qZSI.
VinVdc
L3 L2 L1D2 D1
C3 C2
C1
LOAD
C4
D4L4
D3
D5
Figure 4. Diode-Assisted extended-boost discontinuous-current qZSI.
VinVdc
L3 L2 L1D2 D1
C3
C2
C1C4
LOAD
C5
D4L4
C6
Figure 5. Capacitor-Assisted extended-boost continuous-current qZSI.
VinVdc
L3 L2 L1D2 D1
C3 C2
C1C4
LOAD
C5
D4L4
C6
Figure 6. Capacitor-Assisted extended-boost discontinuous-current qZSI.
L3 L2 L1D2 D1
C3 C2
C1C4
loadIdcV inV
(a)
L1L2L3
C1C4
C2C3
loadIinVdcV dV
(b)
International Journal of Electronics and Electrical Engineering Vol. 4, No. 1, February 2016
©2016 Int. J. Electron. Electr. Eng. 18
L1L2L3
C1C4
C2C3
dVdcV
(c)
Figure 7. (a) Structure of the capacitor-assisted extended-boost discontinuous current quasi Z-source first extension (b) Non-shoot-
through state. (c) Shoot-through state.
The inverter’s action is replaced by a current source
plus a single switch. First, consider the nonshoot-through
state, which is represented with an open switch. Fig. 7(b)
shows the equivalent-circuit diagram for nonshoot-
through state. Then, by applying KVL, the following
steady-state equations can be observed:
1 1C LV V (1)
2 2C LV V (2)
3 3C LV V (3)
3dc C dV V V (4)
Consider equivalent circuit of shoot-through state
shown in Fig. 7(c):
2 1 0d C LV V V (5)
1 2 0d C LV V V (6)
3dc C dV V V (7)
Considering the fact that the average voltage across the
inductors is zero and by defining the shoot-through duty
ratio as SD and nonshoot-through duty ratio as
AD ,
where 1A SD D , the following equations can be
derived:
sh
S
TD
T (8)
ns
A
TD
T (9)
1 2
1 3
S
d dc
S
DV V
D
(10)
1
1 3in dc
S
V VD
(11)
where, shT is the total shoot-through state period and
nsT
is the total nonshoot-through state period during all
period of switching, T. According to the above equations,
boost factor for one stage capacitor-assisted extended-
boost is as follows:
1
1 3 S
BD
(12)
The following equation is obtained for both structures
of capacitor-assisted extended-boost in which the boost
factor will increase while the number of stages increases:
1
(1 ( 2) )S
Bn D
(13)
where, n is the number of capacitor-assisted stages. The
added stages provide the boosting function without
disturbing the operation of inverter.
Similar argument, boost factor relation for both
topologies discontinuous-current and continuous-current
for diode-assisted can be written as:
1
(1 2 )(1 )n
S S
BD D
(14)
III. PROPOSED TOPOLOGY
Parallel operation of inverters has many advantages
such as modularity, ease of maintenance, (n+1)
redundancy, high reliability, etc. [19]-[22]. In addition to
these, output current ripple of the paralleled inverter can
be reduced significantly by virtue of interleaving effect
[23]. The basic concept of the proposed Extended Boost
Quasi Z-source with N-parallel inverters is shown in Fig.
8.
Extended
Boost
Quasi
Z-Source
VinVdc
Inverter 2
Inverter 1
Inverter N
Load
1bL
1aL
1cL
2aL
2bL
2cL
aNL
bNL
cNL
Figure 8. Basic concept of the proposed Extended-boost Quasi Z-
source with N-parallel inverters.
In the proposed topology (Fig. 8) both the diode-
assisted and capacitor-assisted extended-boost quasi Z-
Source topologies can be used. However, capacitor-
assisted topology is used in this paper, because it would
produce high boost with smaller shoot-through as well as
it would apply lower voltage stress on devices [11]. It is
assumed that all the inverters share the same dc bus that
is fed from EBQZS converters.
According to (13) and (14), different gains due to
different boost factors can be achieved for both the diode
and capacitor assisted extended boost qZSI:
G MB (15)
Then the peak ac-output voltage ˆoutV can be written as
follows:
ˆ ( )2
dc
out
VV B M (16)
International Journal of Electronics and Electrical Engineering Vol. 4, No. 1, February 2016
©2016 Int. J. Electron. Electr. Eng. 19
Since the voltage at the point of common connection is
derived from the switching of different power
semiconductors, an intermodule reactor is absolutely
necessary to interconnect the different inverters. Fig. 9
shows a simplified equivalent circuit of the system
illustrated in Fig. 8. It is assumed that each inverter
develops a balanced three phase voltage and its
intermodule reactor consists of identical phase inductors.
However, differences may exist between different
inverter modules, both in voltage and reactance.
Under such assumptions, the equivalent circuit
illustrated in Fig. 9, may be further simplified into a
phasor equivalent circuit shown in Fig. 10. Here, each
inverter is represented by its internal phasor voltage
source, and one inductor and one resistor representing the
equivalent series resistance of the circuit.
o Load
AI
BI
CI
1AI
1BI
1CI
2AI
2BI
2CI
ANI
BNI
CNI
AV
BV
CV
1AV
2AV
ANV
2BV
1CV
1BV
2CV
BNV
CNV
O
1AL
1BL
1CL
2AL
2BL
2CL
ANL
BNL
CNL
Figure 9. Simplified equivalent circuit of N three-phase inverters connected in parallel.
1I
2I
NI
CV
LI
1L
2L
NL
1R
2R
NR
1V
2V
NV
O
Figure 10. Simplified phasor model for N three-phase inverters connected in parallel.
Inverter pole voltage and current vectors can be
defined as 1 2( ... )T
NV V V and 1 2( ... )T
NI I I
respectively, corresponding to the labels illustrated in Fig.
10. Now, the thevenin impedance of thi inverter, iZ
may be identified to be:
, = 1, 2, ... , i i iZ R j L i N , , = 1, 2, ... , i i iZ R j L i N (17)
And the equivalent thevenin impedance of all inverters
in parallel, THZ , may be determined as:
1 2Z ...TH NZ Z Z (18)
Furthermore, the voltage at the common coupling point
can be calculated to be:
1
( )N
j
C TH L
j j
VV Z I
Z
(19)
Now, the output current of the thi inverter can be
evaluated as:
1
( ) , N
jTH i TH
i L
ji i j j
VZ V ZI I i
Z Z Z Z
, 1
( ) , N
jTH i TH
i L
ji i j j
VZ V ZI I i
Z Z Z Z
(20)
It may be observed from (20), that various iZ play an
important role in determining the sharing of current
between the different modules. In order to quantify this
phenomenon, the sensitivity of the current to the thevenin
impedance, iZ can be determined to be:
2 2 32 , i L i TH
TH i
i i i i
I I V ZZ V i
Z Z Z Z
,
2 2 32 , i L i TH
TH i
i i i i
I I V ZZ V i
Z Z Z Z
(21)
Therefore, small deviations in equivalent thevenin
impedances of inverters can result in uneven current
distributions as suggested by (20). From (21), we can also
observe that, if the thevenin impedance is increased, the
dependence of output current on the output impedance is
also decreased leading to better current distribution.
As mentioned previously, this topology can be
modulated using the modulation methods such as the
simple control [3], maximum boost control [24] and
third-harmonic injection control [25]. Table I is the
summary of different PWM control methods for basic
ZSI. Fig. 11(a) shows voltage gain versus modulation
index and Fig. 11(b) shows voltage stress versus
modulation index for different PWM control methods
which have been used in basic ZSI. It is obvious from
these figures, the operation region of the third-harmonic
injection method is more than the others and by using this
method, voltage gain versus modulation index for both
the diode-assisted and capacitor-assisted EBQZSI topologies are drawn in Fig. 12(a) and Fig. 12(b),
respectively. These figures show how increasing in the
number of stages (n) will increase the operation region.
TABLE I. SUMMARY OF DIFFERENT PWM CONTROL METHODS
EXPRESSIONS
Control Method
Simple Max. Boost 3rd harmonic
injection
0D 1 M
2 3 3
2
M
2 3
2
M
B 1
2 1M
3 3M
1
3 1M
G 2 1
M
M
3 3
M
M
3 1
M
M
maxM 2 1
G
G
3 3
G
G
3 1
G
G
SV (2 1) inG V 3 3
in
GV
( 3 1) inG V
International Journal of Electronics and Electrical Engineering Vol. 4, No. 1, February 2016
©2016 Int. J. Electron. Electr. Eng. 20
0.6 0.8 1 1.20
5
10
15
20
25
30
Modulation Index (M)
Vo
lta
ge G
ain
(G
)
Simple
Max. Boost
3rd harmonic injection
(a)
0.6 0.8 1 1.20
5
10
15
20
25
30
Modulation Index (M)Vo
lta
ge s
tress
/ E
qu
iva
len
t D
C v
olt
ag
e
Simple
Max. Boost
3rd harmonic injection
(b)
Figure 11. (a) Voltage gain versus modulation index, and (b) voltage
stress versus modulation index for different PWM control methods of basic ZSI.
0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.10
5
10
15
20
25
30
Modulation Index (M)
Vo
lta
ge G
ain
(G
)
n=1
n=2
n=3
n=4
(a)
0.8 0.9 1 1.10
5
10
15
20
25
30
Modulation Index (M)
Vo
lta
ge G
ain
(G
)
n=1
n=2
n=3
n=4
(b)
Figure 12. Voltage gain (G) versus modulation index (M) (a) diode assisted mode (b) capacitor assisted mode.
IV. SIMULATION RESULTS
Extensive computer simulation using MATLAB-
Simulink has been performed to prove performance of the
proposed inverter. The simulation schematic is shown in
Fig. 13. The results are obtained for the operation of
discontinuous current capacitor-assisted extended boost
qZSI topology. The structure parameters are presented in
Table II. The modulation method which is proposed in
[24] is used in this simulation.
It is considered that the converter is operated with zero
boost in the beginning and at t = 250ms the shoot-through
is increased to 0.2 while the modulation index is kept
constant at 0.967.
The simulation results for the voltage across the
inverters (Vx) and output voltage are shown in Fig. 14
and Fig. 15. The output current of the top and down
inverters and the load current are shown in Fig. 16(a), Fig.
16(b) and Fig. 16(c), respectively. All simulation results
comply with the equations derived in Sections II and III.
Inverter 1
Inverter 2
Vdc
Vx
Figure 13. Structure of two paralleled operation of discontinuous current capacitor assisted extended boost qZSI.
TABLE II. THE PARAMETERS OF THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE
Input voltage 100 V
Extend Capacitor 1 mF
Extend Inductor 3.5 mH
Output filter capacitor 20 µF
Output filter inductor 15 mH
Load Resistor 9.7 Ω
Load Inductor 25 mH
Switching frequency 10 KHz
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.60
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Time (S)
DC
Lin
k V
olt
ag
e V
x (
V)
Figure 14. Voltage across the inverters (Vx).
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.6
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
Time (S)
Ou
tpu
t V
olt
ag
e (
V)
Figure 15. Output voltage of the simulated circuit.
International Journal of Electronics and Electrical Engineering Vol. 4, No. 1, February 2016
©2016 Int. J. Electron. Electr. Eng. 21
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.6-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
Time (S)
Cu
rren
t W
av
efo
rm o
f th
e in
ver
ter
1 (
A)
(a)
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.6-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
Time (S)
Cu
rren
t W
av
efo
rm
of
the i
nv
erte
r 2
(A
)
(b)
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.6-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
Time (S)
Lo
ad
Cu
rren
t (A
)
(c)
Figure 16. Current waveforms of the simulated circuit.
As mentioned, increment in the number of EBQZS
converter stages will increase the amplitude of voltage to
a desired value. Additionally, in conditions where the
load requires higher current, in order to prevent the
probable damages to the switches, by increasing the
number of inverters in parallel we can supply the load by
desired current.
V. CONCLUSION
This paper has presented a new structure based on
combination of extended-boost quasi z-source converters
and parallel inverters to expand the range of system's
voltage gain and supply high load currents. With this
structure, the proposed inverter has the following features:
a) The proposed inverter has all the advantages of
paralleling power converters such as modularity,
ease of maintenance, (n+1) redundancy, high
reliability, reducing of the output current ripple by
virtue of interleaving effect, etc.
b) It can be short- or open-circuited without
damaging switching devices. Therefore, it is very
resistant to EMI noise and therefore its robustness
and reliability are significantly improved.
c) Voltage gain of the proposed inverter can be
increased by increasing in the number of
extended-boost quasi z-source converter stages.
d) Since here the load current can be divided between
all inverters, in conditions where the load requires
high current, the probable damages to the switches
which can be caused by high currents are
preventable.
The steady state operation is performed to analyze the
boosting capability then it is validated by simulation
results.
REFERENCES
[1] Y. Huang, M. Shen, F. Z. Peng, and J. Wang, “Z-Source inverter
for residential photovoltaic systems,” IEEE Trans. Power
Electron., vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1776-1782, Nov. 2006. [2] H. Abu-Rub, et al., “Quasi-Z-Source inverter-based photovoltaic
generation system with maximum power tracking control using ANFIS,” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 4, no. 1,
pp. 11-20, Jan. 2013.
[3] F. Z. Peng, “Z-Source inverter,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 504-510, Mar./Apr. 2003.
[4] C. J. Gajanayake, D. M. Vilathgamuwa, and P. C. Loh,
“Development of a comprehensive model and a multiloop controller for Z-source inverter DG systems,” IEEE Trans. Ind.
Electron., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 2352-2359, Aug. 2007. [5] F. Gao, P. C. Loh, F. Blaabjerg, and C. J. Gajanayake,
“Operational analysis and comparative evaluation of embedded Z-
source inverters,” in Proc. IEEE Power Electron. Spec. Conf. (PESC), 2008, pp. 2757-2763.
[6] J. Anderson and F. Z. Peng, “Four quasi-Z-source inverters,” in Proc. IEEE Power Electron. Spec. Conf. (PESC), 2008, pp. 2743-
2749.
[7] P. C. Loh, D. M. Vilathgamuwa, Y. S. Lai, C. G. Tin, and Y. Li, “Pulse-Width modulation of Z-source inverters,” IEEE Trans.
Power Electron., vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1346-1355, Nov. 2005. [8] S. Rajakaruna and Y. R. L. Jayawickrama, “Designing impedance
network of Z-source inverters,” in Proc. 7th Int. Power Eng. Conf.
(IPEC), 2005, vol. 2, pp. 962-967. [9] P. C. Loh, F. Gao, and F. Blaabjerg, “Topological and modulation
design of three-level Z-source inverters,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 2268-2277, Sep. 2008.
[10] P. C. Loh, C. J. Gajanayake, D. M. Vilathgamuwa, and F.
Blaabjerg, “Evaluation of resonant damping techniques for Z-source current-type inverter,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol.
23, no. 4, pp. 2035-2043, Jul. 2008. [11] C. J. Gajanayake, F. L. Luo, H. B. Gooi, P. L. So, and L. K. Siow
“Extended-Boost Z-source inverters,” IEEE Trans. Power
Electron., vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 2642-2652, Oct. 2010. [12] J. Korhonen, T. Itkonen, J.-P. Strom, J. Tyster, and P. T.
Silventoinen, “Active motor terminal overvoltage mitigation method for parallel voltage source inverters,” IET Power Electron.,
vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 1430-1437, Sep. 2012.
[13] S. K. Mazumder and K. Acharya, “Performance evaluation of a new hybrid-modulation scheme for high-frequency-AC-link
inverter: Application for PV, wind, fuel-cell, and DER/storage applications,” in Proc. IEEE ECCE, 2010, pp. 2529-2534.
[14] R. Turner, S. Walton, and R. Duke, “Stability and bandwidth
implications of digitally controlled grid-connected parallel inverters,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 3685-
3694, Nov. 2010. [15] S. K. Mazumder, R. K. Burra, R. Huang, M. Tahir, and K.
Acharya, “A universal grid-connected fuel-cell inverter for
residential application,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 3431-3447, Oct. 2010.
[16] J. He, Y. W. Li, D. Bosnjak, and B. Harris, “Investigation and active damping of multiple resonances in a parallel-inverter-based
microgrid,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 234-
246, Jan. 2013. [17] K.-D. Wu, J.-C. Wu, H.-L. Jou, C.-Y. Chen, and C.-Y. Lin,
“Simplified control method for parallel-connected dc/ac
inverters,” IEE Proc.: Elect. Power Appl., vol. 153, no. 6, pp. 787-
792, Nov. 2006.
[18] T. Kawabata and S. Higashino, “Parallel operation of voltage source inverters,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 281-
287, Mar./Apr. 1988.
International Journal of Electronics and Electrical Engineering Vol. 4, No. 1, February 2016
©2016 Int. J. Electron. Electr. Eng. 22
[19] S. Ogasawara, J. Takagaki, H. Magi, and A. Nabae, “A novel control scheme of a parallel current-controlled PWM inverter,”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1023-1030, Sep. 1992.
[20] F. Ueda, K. Matsui, M. Asao, and K. Tsuboi, “Parallel-Connections of pulsewidth modulated inverters using current
sharing reactors,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 673-679, Nov. 1995.
[21] Y. Zhang and H. Ma, “Theoretical and experimental investigation
of networked control for parallel operation of inverters,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 1961-1970, Apr. 2012.
[22] K. Matsui, Y. Kawata, and F. Ueda, “Application of parallel connected NPCPWM inverters with multilevel modulation for AC
motor drive,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 15, no. 5, pp.
901-907, Sep. 2000. [23] D. Shin, et al., “Parallel operation of trans-Z-source inverter,” in
Proc. IEEE 8th International Conference on Power Electronics and ECCE Asia, 2011, pp. 774-748.
[24] F. Z. Peng, M. Shen, and Z. Qian, “Maximum boost control of the
Z-source inverter,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 833-838, Jul./Aug. 2005.
[25] M. Shen, J. Wang, A. Joseph, F. Z. Peng, L. M. Tolbert, and D. J. Adams, “Constant boost control of the Z-source inverter to
minimize current ripple and voltage stress,” IEEE Trans. Ind.
Appl., vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 770-778, May/Jun. 2006.
Ali Zakerian was born in Andimeshk, Iran, in 1990. He received the B.Sc. degree in Power
Electrical Engineering from Urmia University,
Urmia, Iran in 2013 and is currently a M.Sc. student in Power Electrical Engineering in the
same university. His current research interests include power electronic converters, multilevel
converters, Z-source converters, Application of
Power Electronics in Renewable Energy Systems, Flexible AC Transmission Systems
(FACTS), Hybrid and Electric vehicles.
Daryoosh Nazarpour was born in Urmia,
Iran in 1958. He received his B.Sc. degree from Iran University of Science and
Technology, Tehran, Iran in 1982 and the M.Sc. degree from Faculty of Engineering,
University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran in 1988. He
received the Ph.D. degree from Tabriz University, in 2005 in Electrical Power
Engineering. He is now an Associate Professor in Urmia University, Iran. His
research interests include Power Electronics, Flexible AC Transmission
Systems (FACTS), Power Quality in Power systems, Transients in Electrical Power Systems, Renewable Energy systems, Power System
Stability and Control.
International Journal of Electronics and Electrical Engineering Vol. 4, No. 1, February 2016
©2016 Int. J. Electron. Electr. Eng. 23