Paradoxical Twins - Beyond an Introductiondcross/academics/misc/twins.pdfParadox GR Paradox...
122
Paradoxical Twins Beyond an Introduction Daniel J. Cross Department of Physics Drexel University Philadelphia, PA 19104 April 25, 2008
Transcript of Paradoxical Twins - Beyond an Introductiondcross/academics/misc/twins.pdfParadox GR Paradox...
Paradoxical TwinsBeyond an Introduction
Daniel J. Cross
Department of PhysicsDrexel University
Philadelphia, PA 19104
April 25, 2008
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
The Standard Twin Paradox
We have two twins:1) In the I.F. O.2) In two different I.F.’s, O′1and O′2.
Blind application of timedilation leads to contradiction.
Actually, O′ does see O-clockrun slowly, but there is also asudden aging at theturn-around point. Using finiteacceleration, we can accountfor this faster aging as agravitational effect.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
The Standard Twin Paradox
We have two twins:1) In the I.F. O.2) In two different I.F.’s, O′1and O′2.
Blind application of timedilation leads to contradiction.
Actually, O′ does see O-clockrun slowly, but there is also asudden aging at theturn-around point. Using finiteacceleration, we can accountfor this faster aging as agravitational effect.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
The Standard Twin Paradox
We have two twins:1) In the I.F. O.2) In two different I.F.’s, O′1and O′2.
Blind application of timedilation leads to contradiction.
Actually, O′ does see O-clockrun slowly, but there is also asudden aging at theturn-around point. Using finiteacceleration, we can accountfor this faster aging as agravitational effect.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
The Standard Twin Paradox
We have two twins:1) In the I.F. O.2) In two different I.F.’s, O′1and O′2.
Blind application of timedilation leads to contradiction.
Actually, O′ does see O-clockrun slowly, but there is also asudden aging at theturn-around point. Using finiteacceleration, we can accountfor this faster aging as agravitational effect.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Inertial Twins I
Can we have the twins both be inertial?
Yes! If we allow curvature.
Radial equation:
−FN + FCE ± FCO = 0
Coriolis force (FCO) is agravito-magnetic effect
FCO and FCE dependdifferently on φ, sodifferent orbital speeds arerequired.
Since O′ moves faster, she ages less!
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Inertial Twins I
Can we have the twins both be inertial?
Yes! If we allow curvature.
Radial equation:
−FN + FCE ± FCO = 0
Coriolis force (FCO) is agravito-magnetic effect
FCO and FCE dependdifferently on φ, sodifferent orbital speeds arerequired.
Since O′ moves faster, she ages less!
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Inertial Twins I
Can we have the twins both be inertial?
Yes! If we allow curvature.
Radial equation:
−FN + FCE ± FCO = 0
Coriolis force (FCO) is agravito-magnetic effect
FCO and FCE dependdifferently on φ, sodifferent orbital speeds arerequired.
Since O′ moves faster, she ages less!
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Inertial Twins I
Can we have the twins both be inertial?
Yes! If we allow curvature.
Radial equation:
−FN + FCE ± FCO = 0
Coriolis force (FCO) is agravito-magnetic effect
FCO and FCE dependdifferently on φ, sodifferent orbital speeds arerequired.
Since O′ moves faster, she ages less!
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Inertial Twins I
Can we have the twins both be inertial?
Yes! If we allow curvature.
Radial equation:−FN + FCE
Coriolis force (FCO) is agravito-magnetic effect
FCO and FCE dependdifferently on φ, sodifferent orbital speeds arerequired.
Since O′ moves faster, she ages less!
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Inertial Twins I
Can we have the twins both be inertial?
Yes! If we allow curvature.
Radial equation:−FN + FCE ± FCO = 0
Coriolis force (FCO) is agravito-magnetic effect
FCO and FCE dependdifferently on φ, sodifferent orbital speeds arerequired.
Since O′ moves faster, she ages less!
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Inertial Twins I
Can we have the twins both be inertial?
Yes! If we allow curvature.
Radial equation:−FN + FCE ± FCO = 0Coriolis force (FCO) is agravito-magnetic effect
FCO and FCE dependdifferently on φ, sodifferent orbital speeds arerequired.
Since O′ moves faster, she ages less!
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Inertial Twins I
Can we have the twins both be inertial?
Yes! If we allow curvature.
Radial equation:−FN + FCE ± FCO = 0Coriolis force (FCO) is agravito-magnetic effect
FCO and FCE dependdifferently on φ, sodifferent orbital speeds arerequired.
Since O′ moves faster, she ages less!
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Inertial Twins I
Can we have the twins both be inertial?
Yes! If we allow curvature.
Radial equation:−FN + FCE ± FCO = 0Coriolis force (FCO) is agravito-magnetic effect
FCO and FCE dependdifferently on φ, sodifferent orbital speeds arerequired.
Since O′ moves faster, she ages less!
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Inertial Twins I
Geodesics locally maximize proper time.
Geometry in a neighborhood of each twin is different, sothere is a geometric asymmetry between the two twins.
It would be interesting to compute perceived aging directlyin each twins’ frame.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Inertial Twins I
Geodesics locally maximize proper time.
Geometry in a neighborhood of each twin is different, sothere is a geometric asymmetry between the two twins.
It would be interesting to compute perceived aging directlyin each twins’ frame.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Inertial Twins I
Geodesics locally maximize proper time.
Geometry in a neighborhood of each twin is different, sothere is a geometric asymmetry between the two twins.
It would be interesting to compute perceived aging directlyin each twins’ frame.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Inertial Twins I
Geodesics locally maximize proper time.
Geometry in a neighborhood of each twin is different, sothere is a geometric asymmetry between the two twins.
It would be interesting to compute perceived aging directlyin each twins’ frame.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Inertial Twins II
Can we do this without curvature?
Intrinsic curvature (geometry) 7→ extrinsic curvature(topology).
7→
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Inertial Twins II
Can we do this without curvature?
Intrinsic curvature (geometry) 7→ extrinsic curvature(topology).
7→
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Inertial Twins II
Can we do this without curvature?
Intrinsic curvature (geometry) 7→ extrinsic curvature(topology).
7→
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Inertial Twins II
Can we do this without curvature?
Intrinsic curvature (geometry) 7→ extrinsic curvature(topology).
7→
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Inertial Twins II
Can we do this without curvature?
Intrinsic curvature (geometry) 7→ extrinsic curvature(topology).
7→
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Periodic Boundary Conditions
→
Identify points that differby L.
Contradiction?
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Periodic Boundary Conditions
→
Identify points that differby L.
Contradiction?
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Periodic Boundary Conditions Examined
Let’s look at the boundary conditions:(tx
)∼
(t
x+ nL
)
Λ(tx
)∼ Λ
(tx
)+ Λ
(0nL
)(t′
x′
)∼
(t′
x′
)+(−vγnLγnL
)
The identification condition is not Lorentz invariant.
The naive Minkowki diagram for O′ is incorrect since itassumed the condition (t′, x′) ∼ (t′, x′ + nL).
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Periodic Boundary Conditions Examined
Let’s look at the boundary conditions:(tx
)∼
(t
x+ nL
)Λ(tx
)∼ Λ
(tx
)+ Λ
(0nL
)
(t′
x′
)∼
(t′
x′
)+(−vγnLγnL
)
The identification condition is not Lorentz invariant.
The naive Minkowki diagram for O′ is incorrect since itassumed the condition (t′, x′) ∼ (t′, x′ + nL).
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Periodic Boundary Conditions Examined
Let’s look at the boundary conditions:(tx
)∼
(t
x+ nL
)Λ(tx
)∼ Λ
(tx
)+ Λ
(0nL
)(t′
x′
)∼
(t′
x′
)+(−vγnLγnL
)
The identification condition is not Lorentz invariant.
The naive Minkowki diagram for O′ is incorrect since itassumed the condition (t′, x′) ∼ (t′, x′ + nL).
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Periodic Boundary Conditions Examined
Let’s look at the boundary conditions:(tx
)∼
(t
x+ nL
)Λ(tx
)∼ Λ
(tx
)+ Λ
(0nL
)(t′
x′
)∼
(t′
x′
)+(−vγnLγnL
)
The identification condition is not Lorentz invariant.
The naive Minkowki diagram for O′ is incorrect since itassumed the condition (t′, x′) ∼ (t′, x′ + nL).
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Periodic Boundary Conditions Examined
Let’s look at the boundary conditions:(tx
)∼
(t
x+ nL
)Λ(tx
)∼ Λ
(tx
)+ Λ
(0nL
)(t′
x′
)∼
(t′
x′
)+(−vγnLγnL
)
The identification condition is not Lorentz invariant.
The naive Minkowki diagram for O′ is incorrect since itassumed the condition (t′, x′) ∼ (t′, x′ + nL).
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
The (Real) Minkowki Diagram
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
The (Real) Minkowki Diagram
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
The (Real) Minkowki Diagram
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
The (Real) Minkowki Diagram
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
How old is O?
O′ sees O clock run slowly by γ.But there is an additional vγL = Tγv2.Thus the total aging of O as seen by O′ is
T =(T ′ + Tγv2
)/γ
=(T
γ+ Tγv2
)/γ
= T(γ−2 + (1− γ−2)
)= T
They agree!
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
How old is O?
O′ sees O clock run slowly by γ.
But there is an additional vγL = Tγv2.Thus the total aging of O as seen by O′ is
T =(T ′ + Tγv2
)/γ
=(T
γ+ Tγv2
)/γ
= T(γ−2 + (1− γ−2)
)= T
They agree!
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
How old is O?
O′ sees O clock run slowly by γ.But there is an additional vγL = Tγv2.
Thus the total aging of O as seen by O′ is
T =(T ′ + Tγv2
)/γ
=(T
γ+ Tγv2
)/γ
= T(γ−2 + (1− γ−2)
)= T
They agree!
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
How old is O?
O′ sees O clock run slowly by γ.But there is an additional vγL = Tγv2.Thus the total aging of O as seen by O′ is
T =(T ′ + Tγv2
)/γ
=(T
γ+ Tγv2
)/γ
= T(γ−2 + (1− γ−2)
)= T
They agree!
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
How old is O?
O′ sees O clock run slowly by γ.But there is an additional vγL = Tγv2.Thus the total aging of O as seen by O′ is
T =(T ′ + Tγv2
)/γ
=(T
γ+ Tγv2
)/γ
= T(γ−2 + (1− γ−2)
)= T
They agree!
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
How old is O?
O′ sees O clock run slowly by γ.But there is an additional vγL = Tγv2.Thus the total aging of O as seen by O′ is
T =(T ′ + Tγv2
)/γ
=(T
γ+ Tγv2
)/γ
= T(γ−2 + (1− γ−2)
)= T
They agree!
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
How old is O?
O′ sees O clock run slowly by γ.But there is an additional vγL = Tγv2.Thus the total aging of O as seen by O′ is
T =(T ′ + Tγv2
)/γ
=(T
γ+ Tγv2
)/γ
= T(γ−2 + (1− γ−2)
)
= T
They agree!
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
How old is O?
O′ sees O clock run slowly by γ.But there is an additional vγL = Tγv2.Thus the total aging of O as seen by O′ is
T =(T ′ + Tγv2
)/γ
=(T
γ+ Tγv2
)/γ
= T(γ−2 + (1− γ−2)
)= T
They agree!
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
How old is O?
O′ sees O clock run slowly by γ.But there is an additional vγL = Tγv2.Thus the total aging of O as seen by O′ is
T =(T ′ + Tγv2
)/γ
=(T
γ+ Tγv2
)/γ
= T(γ−2 + (1− γ−2)
)= T
They agree!
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Frame Oddities
O′ frame is not a global inertial frame.
Attempting such a frame results in unsynchronized clocks.
The universe is larger (γL) for O′.
The universe is anisotropic in O′.
Each observer sees images of herself in both directions
O: all the same age t.
O′: differ in age by ±Lvγ.
Including light propagation:
O: sees self in past by L.
O′ sees self in past by γL± Lvγ = Lγ(1± v) = L√
1±v1∓v
Thus the universe is shorter in one direction than the other.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Frame Oddities
O′ frame is not a global inertial frame.
Attempting such a frame results in unsynchronized clocks.
The universe is larger (γL) for O′.
The universe is anisotropic in O′.
Each observer sees images of herself in both directions
O: all the same age t.
O′: differ in age by ±Lvγ.
Including light propagation:
O: sees self in past by L.
O′ sees self in past by γL± Lvγ = Lγ(1± v) = L√
1±v1∓v
Thus the universe is shorter in one direction than the other.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Frame Oddities
O′ frame is not a global inertial frame.
Attempting such a frame results in unsynchronized clocks.
The universe is larger (γL) for O′.
The universe is anisotropic in O′.
Each observer sees images of herself in both directions
O: all the same age t.
O′: differ in age by ±Lvγ.
Including light propagation:
O: sees self in past by L.
O′ sees self in past by γL± Lvγ = Lγ(1± v) = L√
1±v1∓v
Thus the universe is shorter in one direction than the other.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Frame Oddities
O′ frame is not a global inertial frame.
Attempting such a frame results in unsynchronized clocks.
The universe is larger (γL) for O′.
The universe is anisotropic in O′.
Each observer sees images of herself in both directions
O: all the same age t.
O′: differ in age by ±Lvγ.
Including light propagation:
O: sees self in past by L.
O′ sees self in past by γL± Lvγ = Lγ(1± v) = L√
1±v1∓v
Thus the universe is shorter in one direction than the other.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Frame Oddities
O′ frame is not a global inertial frame.
Attempting such a frame results in unsynchronized clocks.
The universe is larger (γL) for O′.
The universe is anisotropic in O′.
Each observer sees images of herself in both directions
O: all the same age t.
O′: differ in age by ±Lvγ.
Including light propagation:
O: sees self in past by L.
O′ sees self in past by γL± Lvγ = Lγ(1± v) = L√
1±v1∓v
Thus the universe is shorter in one direction than the other.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Frame Oddities
O′ frame is not a global inertial frame.
Attempting such a frame results in unsynchronized clocks.
The universe is larger (γL) for O′.
The universe is anisotropic in O′.
Each observer sees images of herself in both directions
O: all the same age t.
O′: differ in age by ±Lvγ.
Including light propagation:
O: sees self in past by L.
O′ sees self in past by γL± Lvγ = Lγ(1± v) = L√
1±v1∓v
Thus the universe is shorter in one direction than the other.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Frame Oddities
O′ frame is not a global inertial frame.
Attempting such a frame results in unsynchronized clocks.
The universe is larger (γL) for O′.
The universe is anisotropic in O′.
Each observer sees images of herself in both directions
O: all the same age t.
O′: differ in age by ±Lvγ.
Including light propagation:
O: sees self in past by L.
O′ sees self in past by γL± Lvγ = Lγ(1± v) = L√
1±v1∓v
Thus the universe is shorter in one direction than the other.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Frame Oddities
O′ frame is not a global inertial frame.
Attempting such a frame results in unsynchronized clocks.
The universe is larger (γL) for O′.
The universe is anisotropic in O′.
Each observer sees images of herself in both directions
O: all the same age t.
O′: differ in age by ±Lvγ.
Including light propagation:
O: sees self in past by L.
O′ sees self in past by γL± Lvγ = Lγ(1± v) = L√
1±v1∓v
Thus the universe is shorter in one direction than the other.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Frame Oddities
O′ frame is not a global inertial frame.
Attempting such a frame results in unsynchronized clocks.
The universe is larger (γL) for O′.
The universe is anisotropic in O′.
Each observer sees images of herself in both directions
O: all the same age t.
O′: differ in age by ±Lvγ.
Including light propagation:
O: sees self in past by L.
O′ sees self in past by γL± Lvγ = Lγ(1± v) = L√
1±v1∓v
Thus the universe is shorter in one direction than the other.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Frame Oddities
O′ frame is not a global inertial frame.
Attempting such a frame results in unsynchronized clocks.
The universe is larger (γL) for O′.
The universe is anisotropic in O′.
Each observer sees images of herself in both directions
O: all the same age t.
O′: differ in age by ±Lvγ.
Including light propagation:
O: sees self in past by L.
O′ sees self in past by γL± Lvγ = Lγ(1± v) = L√
1±v1∓v
Thus the universe is shorter in one direction than the other.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Frame Oddities
O′ frame is not a global inertial frame.
Attempting such a frame results in unsynchronized clocks.
The universe is larger (γL) for O′.
The universe is anisotropic in O′.
Each observer sees images of herself in both directions
O: all the same age t.
O′: differ in age by ±Lvγ.
Including light propagation:
O: sees self in past by L.
O′ sees self in past by γL± Lvγ = Lγ(1± v) = L√
1±v1∓v
Thus the universe is shorter in one direction than the other.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Frame Oddities
O′ frame is not a global inertial frame.
Attempting such a frame results in unsynchronized clocks.
The universe is larger (γL) for O′.
The universe is anisotropic in O′.
Each observer sees images of herself in both directions
O: all the same age t.
O′: differ in age by ±Lvγ.
Including light propagation:
O: sees self in past by L.
O′ sees self in past by γL± Lvγ = Lγ(1± v) = L√
1±v1∓v
Thus the universe is shorter in one direction than the other.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
(Anisotropic) Light Propagation
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
A Preferred Frame
Minkowki space R1,1 is isotropic.
The cylinder R1,1/ ∼= R× S1 is not, since there is adirection which does not go on forever.
However, it is still homogeneous.
We can make this more precise in group theory:
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
A Preferred Frame
Minkowki space R1,1 is isotropic.
The cylinder R1,1/ ∼= R× S1 is not, since there is adirection which does not go on forever.
However, it is still homogeneous.
We can make this more precise in group theory:
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
A Preferred Frame
Minkowki space R1,1 is isotropic.
The cylinder R1,1/ ∼= R× S1 is not, since there is adirection which does not go on forever.
However, it is still homogeneous.
We can make this more precise in group theory:
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
A Preferred Frame
Minkowki space R1,1 is isotropic.
The cylinder R1,1/ ∼= R× S1 is not, since there is adirection which does not go on forever.
However, it is still homogeneous.
We can make this more precise in group theory:
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
A Preferred Frame
Minkowki space R1,1 is isotropic.
The cylinder R1,1/ ∼= R× S1 is not, since there is adirection which does not go on forever.
However, it is still homogeneous.
We can make this more precise in group theory:
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
The Cylinder
The symmetry group of R2 is ISO(2):
M =(Rθ T
0 1
)Rθ is a rotation matrixT is a translation vector.
The action of M on a point is then x′
y′
1
=(Rθ T
0 1
) xy1
=
Rθ
(xy
)+ T
1
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
The Cylinder
The symmetry group of R2 is ISO(2):
M =(Rθ T
0 1
)Rθ is a rotation matrixT is a translation vector.
The action of M on a point is then x′
y′
1
=(Rθ T
0 1
) xy1
=
Rθ
(xy
)+ T
1
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
The Cylinder
The symmetry group of R2 is ISO(2):
M =(Rθ T
0 1
)Rθ is a rotation matrixT is a translation vector.
The action of M on a point is then x′
y′
1
=(Rθ T
0 1
) xy1
=
Rθ
(xy
)+ T
1
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Making a Cylinder
The cylinder is formed from the plane by identifying points thatdiffer by the group operation TL,0, that is: x
y1
∼ TL,0
xy1
=
I2L0
0 1
xy1
=
x+ Ly1
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Making a Cylinder
The cylinder is formed from the plane by identifying points thatdiffer by the group operation TL,0, that is:
xy1
∼ TL,0
xy1
=
I2L0
0 1
xy1
=
x+ Ly1
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Making a Cylinder
The cylinder is formed from the plane by identifying points thatdiffer by the group operation TL,0, that is: x
y1
∼ TL,0
xy1
=
I2L0
0 1
xy1
=
x+ Ly1
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Cylinder Symmetry
What is the symmetry group of the cylinder?For what group operations is it true that:
R2
π→ R× S1
↓ g
↓ h
R2
π→ R× S1
x, Tx
π→ y
↓ g
↓ h
g(x), g(Tx)
π→ h(y)
For the right equation to hold we must have
Tg(x) = gT (x)
that is, g and T commute.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Cylinder Symmetry
What is the symmetry group of the cylinder?
For what group operations is it true that:
R2
π→ R× S1
↓ g
↓ h
R2
π→ R× S1
x, Tx
π→ y
↓ g
↓ h
g(x), g(Tx)
π→ h(y)
For the right equation to hold we must have
Tg(x) = gT (x)
that is, g and T commute.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Cylinder Symmetry
What is the symmetry group of the cylinder?For what group operations is it true that:
R2
π→ R× S1
↓ g
↓ h
R2
π→ R× S1
x, Tx
π→ y
↓ g
↓ h
g(x), g(Tx)
π→ h(y)
For the right equation to hold we must have
Tg(x) = gT (x)
that is, g and T commute.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Cylinder Symmetry
What is the symmetry group of the cylinder?For what group operations is it true that:
R2
π→ R× S1
↓ g
↓ h
R2
π→ R× S1
x, Tx
π→ y
↓ g
↓ h
g(x), g(Tx)
π→ h(y)
For the right equation to hold we must have
Tg(x) = gT (x)
that is, g and T commute.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Cylinder Symmetry
What is the symmetry group of the cylinder?For what group operations is it true that:
R2 π→ R× S1
↓ g
↓ h
R2 π→
R× S1
x, Txπ→ y
↓ g
↓ h
g(x), g(Tx) π→
h(y)
For the right equation to hold we must have
Tg(x) = gT (x)
that is, g and T commute.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Cylinder Symmetry
What is the symmetry group of the cylinder?For what group operations is it true that:
R2 π→ R× S1
↓ g ↓ hR2 π→ R× S1
x, Txπ→ y
↓ g ↓ hg(x), g(Tx) π→ h(y)
For the right equation to hold we must have
Tg(x) = gT (x)
that is, g and T commute.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Cylinder Symmetry
What is the symmetry group of the cylinder?For what group operations is it true that:
R2 π→ R× S1
↓ g ↓ hR2 π→ R× S1
x, Txπ→ y
↓ g ↓ hg(x), g(Tx) π→ h(y)
For the right equation to hold we must have
Tg(x) = gT (x)
that is, g and T commute.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Cylinder Symmetry
What is the symmetry group of the cylinder?For what group operations is it true that:
R2 π→ R× S1
↓ g ↓ hR2 π→ R× S1
x, Txπ→ y
↓ g ↓ hg(x), g(Tx) π→ h(y)
For the right equation to hold we must have
Tg(x) = gT (x)
that is, g and T commute.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Cylinder Symmetry
What is the symmetry group of the cylinder?For what group operations is it true that:
R2 π→ R× S1
↓ g ↓ hR2 π→ R× S1
x, Txπ→ y
↓ g ↓ hg(x), g(Tx) π→ h(y)
For the right equation to hold we must have
Tg(x) = gT (x)
that is, g and T commute.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Cylinder Symmetry
So we want
gT = Tg Rvxvy
0 1
I2L0
0 1
=
I2L0
0 1
Rvxvy
0 1
R R
(L0
)+(vxvy
)0 1
=
R
(L0
)+(vxvy
)0 1
and thus
R
(L0
)=(L0
)and R is the identity and g ∈ T (2) is a translation.Identifying two that differ by T gives S1 × R ' SO(2)× T (1).
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Cylinder Symmetry
So we want
gT = Tg Rvxvy
0 1
I2L0
0 1
=
I2L0
0 1
Rvxvy
0 1
R R
(L0
)+(vxvy
)0 1
=
R
(L0
)+(vxvy
)0 1
and thus
R
(L0
)=(L0
)and R is the identity and g ∈ T (2) is a translation.Identifying two that differ by T gives S1 × R ' SO(2)× T (1).
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Cylinder Symmetry
So we want
gT = Tg
Rvxvy
0 1
I2L0
0 1
=
I2L0
0 1
Rvxvy
0 1
R R
(L0
)+(vxvy
)0 1
=
R
(L0
)+(vxvy
)0 1
and thus
R
(L0
)=(L0
)and R is the identity and g ∈ T (2) is a translation.Identifying two that differ by T gives S1 × R ' SO(2)× T (1).
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Cylinder Symmetry
So we want
gT = Tg Rvxvy
0 1
I2L0
0 1
=
I2L0
0 1
Rvxvy
0 1
R R
(L0
)+(vxvy
)0 1
=
R
(L0
)+(vxvy
)0 1
and thus
R
(L0
)=(L0
)and R is the identity and g ∈ T (2) is a translation.Identifying two that differ by T gives S1 × R ' SO(2)× T (1).
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Cylinder Symmetry
So we want
gT = Tg Rvxvy
0 1
I2L0
0 1
=
I2L0
0 1
Rvxvy
0 1
R R
(L0
)+(vxvy
)0 1
=
R
(L0
)+(vxvy
)0 1
and thus
R
(L0
)=(L0
)and R is the identity and g ∈ T (2) is a translation.Identifying two that differ by T gives S1 × R ' SO(2)× T (1).
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Cylinder Symmetry
So we want
gT = Tg Rvxvy
0 1
I2L0
0 1
=
I2L0
0 1
Rvxvy
0 1
R R
(L0
)+(vxvy
)0 1
=
R
(L0
)+(vxvy
)0 1
and thus
R
(L0
)=(L0
)and R is the identity and g ∈ T (2) is a translation.Identifying two that differ by T gives S1 × R ' SO(2)× T (1).
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Cylinder Symmetry
So we want
gT = Tg Rvxvy
0 1
I2L0
0 1
=
I2L0
0 1
Rvxvy
0 1
R R
(L0
)+(vxvy
)0 1
=
R
(L0
)+(vxvy
)0 1
and thus
R
(L0
)=(L0
)
and R is the identity and g ∈ T (2) is a translation.Identifying two that differ by T gives S1 × R ' SO(2)× T (1).
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Cylinder Symmetry
So we want
gT = Tg Rvxvy
0 1
I2L0
0 1
=
I2L0
0 1
Rvxvy
0 1
R R
(L0
)+(vxvy
)0 1
=
R
(L0
)+(vxvy
)0 1
and thus
R
(L0
)=(L0
)and R is the identity and g ∈ T (2) is a translation.
Identifying two that differ by T gives S1 × R ' SO(2)× T (1).
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Cylinder Symmetry
So we want
gT = Tg Rvxvy
0 1
I2L0
0 1
=
I2L0
0 1
Rvxvy
0 1
R R
(L0
)+(vxvy
)0 1
=
R
(L0
)+(vxvy
)0 1
and thus
R
(L0
)=(L0
)and R is the identity and g ∈ T (2) is a translation.Identifying two that differ by T gives S1 × R ' SO(2)× T (1).
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
The SR Cylinder
The Invariance group of R1,1 is the Poincare group, ISO(1, 1): Λvtvx
0 1
,
We identify points that differ by
T0,L =
I20L
0 1
,
The commuting group operations must satisfy
Λ(
0L
)=(
0L
)And the symmetry group is translations again.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
The SR Cylinder
The Invariance group of R1,1 is the Poincare group, ISO(1, 1):
Λvtvx
0 1
,
We identify points that differ by
T0,L =
I20L
0 1
,
The commuting group operations must satisfy
Λ(
0L
)=(
0L
)And the symmetry group is translations again.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
The SR Cylinder
The Invariance group of R1,1 is the Poincare group, ISO(1, 1): Λvtvx
0 1
,
We identify points that differ by
T0,L =
I20L
0 1
,
The commuting group operations must satisfy
Λ(
0L
)=(
0L
)And the symmetry group is translations again.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
The SR Cylinder
The Invariance group of R1,1 is the Poincare group, ISO(1, 1): Λvtvx
0 1
,
We identify points that differ by
T0,L =
I20L
0 1
,
The commuting group operations must satisfy
Λ(
0L
)=(
0L
)And the symmetry group is translations again.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
The SR Cylinder
The Invariance group of R1,1 is the Poincare group, ISO(1, 1): Λvtvx
0 1
,
We identify points that differ by
T0,L =
I20L
0 1
,
The commuting group operations must satisfy
Λ(
0L
)=(
0L
)And the symmetry group is translations again.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
The SR Cylinder
The Invariance group of R1,1 is the Poincare group, ISO(1, 1): Λvtvx
0 1
,
We identify points that differ by
T0,L =
I20L
0 1
,
The commuting group operations must satisfy
Λ(
0L
)=(
0L
)And the symmetry group is translations again.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
The SR Cylinder
The Invariance group of R1,1 is the Poincare group, ISO(1, 1): Λvtvx
0 1
,
We identify points that differ by
T0,L =
I20L
0 1
,
The commuting group operations must satisfy
Λ(
0L
)=(
0L
)
And the symmetry group is translations again.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
The SR Cylinder
The Invariance group of R1,1 is the Poincare group, ISO(1, 1): Λvtvx
0 1
,
We identify points that differ by
T0,L =
I20L
0 1
,
The commuting group operations must satisfy
Λ(
0L
)=(
0L
)And the symmetry group is translations again.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Cylinder Frames
Up to translations of the origin, there is an unique privilegedsystem of coordinates on R1 × S1 that respects the symmetry.Moreover the symmetries help us construct this frame.So in any other coordinate system either
The metric splits but the coordinates do not.
The coordinates split but the metric does not.
The frame we constructed for O′ kept the metric diagonal, butthe coordinates didn’t respect the symmetry.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Cylinder Frames
Up to translations of the origin, there is an unique privilegedsystem of coordinates on R1 × S1 that respects the symmetry.
Moreover the symmetries help us construct this frame.So in any other coordinate system either
The metric splits but the coordinates do not.
The coordinates split but the metric does not.
The frame we constructed for O′ kept the metric diagonal, butthe coordinates didn’t respect the symmetry.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Cylinder Frames
Up to translations of the origin, there is an unique privilegedsystem of coordinates on R1 × S1 that respects the symmetry.Moreover the symmetries help us construct this frame.
So in any other coordinate system either
The metric splits but the coordinates do not.
The coordinates split but the metric does not.
The frame we constructed for O′ kept the metric diagonal, butthe coordinates didn’t respect the symmetry.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Cylinder Frames
Up to translations of the origin, there is an unique privilegedsystem of coordinates on R1 × S1 that respects the symmetry.Moreover the symmetries help us construct this frame.So in any other coordinate system either
The metric splits but the coordinates do not.
The coordinates split but the metric does not.
The frame we constructed for O′ kept the metric diagonal, butthe coordinates didn’t respect the symmetry.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Cylinder Frames
Up to translations of the origin, there is an unique privilegedsystem of coordinates on R1 × S1 that respects the symmetry.Moreover the symmetries help us construct this frame.So in any other coordinate system either
The metric splits but the coordinates do not.
The coordinates split but the metric does not.
The frame we constructed for O′ kept the metric diagonal, butthe coordinates didn’t respect the symmetry.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Cylinder Frames
Let’s construct a frame for O′ that respects the symmetry.
twist→
f : (t, [x])→ (t, [x− vt])
where [x] means the image of x in the cylinder.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Cylinder Frames
Let’s construct a frame for O′ that respects the symmetry.
twist→
f : (t, [x])→ (t, [x− vt])
where [x] means the image of x in the cylinder.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Cylinder Frames
Let’s construct a frame for O′ that respects the symmetry.
twist→
f : (t, [x])→ (t, [x− vt])
where [x] means the image of x in the cylinder.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Cylinder Frames
Let’s construct a frame for O′ that respects the symmetry.
twist→
f : (t, [x])→ (t, [x− vt])
where [x] means the image of x in the cylinder.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Cylinder Frames
(t
[x]
)7→
(t
[x− vt]
)
f−1 =(
t′
[x′ + vt′]
)Df−1 =
(1 01 −v
)g′ = (Df−1)tgDf−1
=(
1 10 −v
)(−1 00 1
)(1 01 −v
)=
(−1 −v−v 1 + v2
)
Which is not diagonal.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Cylinder Frames
(t
[x]
)7→
(t
[x− vt]
)f−1 =
(t′
[x′ + vt′]
)
Df−1 =(
1 01 −v
)g′ = (Df−1)tgDf−1
=(
1 10 −v
)(−1 00 1
)(1 01 −v
)=
(−1 −v−v 1 + v2
)
Which is not diagonal.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Cylinder Frames
(t
[x]
)7→
(t
[x− vt]
)f−1 =
(t′
[x′ + vt′]
)Df−1 =
(1 01 −v
)
g′ = (Df−1)tgDf−1
=(
1 10 −v
)(−1 00 1
)(1 01 −v
)=
(−1 −v−v 1 + v2
)
Which is not diagonal.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Cylinder Frames
(t
[x]
)7→
(t
[x− vt]
)f−1 =
(t′
[x′ + vt′]
)Df−1 =
(1 01 −v
)g′ = (Df−1)tgDf−1
=(
1 10 −v
)(−1 00 1
)(1 01 −v
)=
(−1 −v−v 1 + v2
)
Which is not diagonal.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Cylinder Frames
(t
[x]
)7→
(t
[x− vt]
)f−1 =
(t′
[x′ + vt′]
)Df−1 =
(1 01 −v
)g′ = (Df−1)tgDf−1
=(
1 10 −v
)(−1 00 1
)(1 01 −v
)
=(−1 −v−v 1 + v2
)
Which is not diagonal.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Cylinder Frames
(t
[x]
)7→
(t
[x− vt]
)f−1 =
(t′
[x′ + vt′]
)Df−1 =
(1 01 −v
)g′ = (Df−1)tgDf−1
=(
1 10 −v
)(−1 00 1
)(1 01 −v
)=
(−1 −v−v 1 + v2
)
Which is not diagonal.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Cylinder Frames
(t
[x]
)7→
(t
[x− vt]
)f−1 =
(t′
[x′ + vt′]
)Df−1 =
(1 01 −v
)g′ = (Df−1)tgDf−1
=(
1 10 −v
)(−1 00 1
)(1 01 −v
)=
(−1 −v−v 1 + v2
)
Which is not diagonal.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Topological Invariant
The number of times the pathwraps around the cylinder is thewinding number.
This makes sense as long as weproject points down in a mannerorthogonal to the space surfaces.
This invariant describes twinaging.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Topological Invariant
The number of times the pathwraps around the cylinder is thewinding number.
This makes sense as long as weproject points down in a mannerorthogonal to the space surfaces.
This invariant describes twinaging.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Topological Invariant
The number of times the pathwraps around the cylinder is thewinding number.
This makes sense as long as weproject points down in a mannerorthogonal to the space surfaces.
This invariant describes twinaging.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Topological Invariant
The number of times the pathwraps around the cylinder is thewinding number.
This makes sense as long as weproject points down in a mannerorthogonal to the space surfaces.
This invariant describes twinaging.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Summary
The twin paradox is possible without acceleration.
Differential aging is always accompanied by anotherasymmetry.
The SR cylinder actually has more in common with GR.
It possessed a preferred frame due to symmetry.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Summary
The twin paradox is possible without acceleration.
Differential aging is always accompanied by anotherasymmetry.
The SR cylinder actually has more in common with GR.
It possessed a preferred frame due to symmetry.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Summary
The twin paradox is possible without acceleration.
Differential aging is always accompanied by anotherasymmetry.
The SR cylinder actually has more in common with GR.
It possessed a preferred frame due to symmetry.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Summary
The twin paradox is possible without acceleration.
Differential aging is always accompanied by anotherasymmetry.
The SR cylinder actually has more in common with GR.
It possessed a preferred frame due to symmetry.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Summary
The twin paradox is possible without acceleration.
Differential aging is always accompanied by anotherasymmetry.
The SR cylinder actually has more in common with GR.
It possessed a preferred frame due to symmetry.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
Fin
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
References I
Donald E. Hall.Can local measurements resolve the twin paradox in a kerrmetric?Am. J. Phys., 44:1204–1208, 1976.
F. Landis Markley.Relativity twins in the kerr metric.Am. J. Phys., 41:1246–1250, 1973.
Dhruv Bansal, John Laing, and Aravindhan Sriharan.On the twin paradox in a universe with a compactdimension.2006, gr-qc/0503070v1.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
References II
E. A. Olszewski.Anisotropy, inhomogeneity,and conservation laws.Am. J. Phys, 51:919–925, 1983.
John D. Barrow and Janna Levin.Twin paradox in compact spaces.Phys. Rev. A, 63:044104, 2001.
Jean-Philippe Uzan, Jean-Piere Luminet, Roland Lehoucq,and Patrick Peter.Twin paradox and space topology.2000, physics/0006039v1.
Tevian Dray.The twin paradox revisited.Am. J. Phys, 58:822–825, 1990.
ParadoxicalTwins
Daniel J.Cross
Introduction
StandardParadox
GR Paradox
Curvature
InertialParadox
SymmetryGroups
Summary
Bibliography
References III
Carl H. Brans and Dennis Ronald Stewart.Unaccelerated-returning-twin paradox in flat space-time.Phys. Rev. D., 8:1662–1666, 1973.
P. C. Peters.Periodic bounday conditions in special relativity.Am. J. Phys., 51:791–795, 1983.
P. C. Peters.Periodic boundary conditions in special relativity applied tomoving walls.Am. J. Phys., 54:334–340, 1986.
