Paper crf design_tools
-
Upload
david-ekka -
Category
Documents
-
view
984 -
download
0
Transcript of Paper crf design_tools
![Page 1: Paper crf design_tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042607/55a1108f1a28ab5a508b4806/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Paper Case Report Form (CRF) Design Tools
12th Annual OCUG ConferenceOctober 7-10, 2007Premier Research
Maureen Medeiros
![Page 2: Paper crf design_tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042607/55a1108f1a28ab5a508b4806/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Objectives
This presentation will…
• Review CRF Design Tools that may be used with OC’s GLIB
• Discuss today’s leading applications in this industry
• Illuminate Features and detail Usability of each tool
• Touch upon Print Layout Quality and Cost of each tool
• Create your own paper ‘CRF Library’
2
![Page 3: Paper crf design_tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042607/55a1108f1a28ab5a508b4806/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Agenda
1. Form Design Software Assessment
2. Design Tool Key Features
3. Develop & Maintain Your ‘CRF Library’
4. Summary and Questions
3
![Page 4: Paper crf design_tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042607/55a1108f1a28ab5a508b4806/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
1. Form Design Software Assessment
1a.) What is form design software?
1b.) What are the CRF format Pros & Cons?
1c.) Which are the top technologies?
4
![Page 5: Paper crf design_tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042607/55a1108f1a28ab5a508b4806/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
1a.) What is form design software?
• It is a software product used to develop CRFs for the collection of subject trial data.
• Form design software are platforms especially manufactured with explicit page layout capabilities. (i.e. blank spaces for data insertion)
• CRFs are functionally designed for: 1. recording data on the form2. data entry into the computer3. data retrieval for analysis
5
![Page 6: Paper crf design_tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042607/55a1108f1a28ab5a508b4806/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
1b.) What are the CRF format Pros & Cons?
• Usability ~ More Difficult• Print Layout Quality ~ Low• CRF Design Aesthetics ~ Low• IT issues ~ Greater
• Cost ~ Lower• Industry ~ Preferred• Build DB / CRF ~ Simultaneously• OC Global Library ~ Available• GLIB objects ~ Approved / Reuse
Electronic
• Cost ~ Higher• Industry ~ Not Preferred• Build DB / CRF ~ Separately• ‘CRF Library’ ~ Develop• CRF objects ~ Develop
• Usability ~ Less Difficult• Print Layout Quality ~ High• CRF Design Aesthetics ~ High• IT issues ~ Less
Paper
ConsProsCRFFormat
6
![Page 7: Paper crf design_tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042607/55a1108f1a28ab5a508b4806/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
1c.) Which are the top technologies?
• These are the 5 leading tools available today. • Choose a tool specializing in form production.
CRF DESIGNTOOLS
OC4.5.0
QuarkXPress
6.5
TELEformDesigner
V8.1
AdobeInDesign
CS3
MicrosoftOffice
Word 2007
7
![Page 8: Paper crf design_tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042607/55a1108f1a28ab5a508b4806/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
OC User InterfaceOC
4.5.0
This is a screen shot of OC’s toolbar layout in the Graphical Layout Editor (GLE).
8
![Page 9: Paper crf design_tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042607/55a1108f1a28ab5a508b4806/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
OC example CRF – draftOC
4.5.0
This is the same CRF Adverse Event (AE) page produced directly from OC’s GLE with approved Global Library objects.
9
![Page 10: Paper crf design_tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042607/55a1108f1a28ab5a508b4806/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
OC example CRF – finalOC
4.5.0
This is the same CRF AE page as OC’s print-ready CRF in PDF format with header and footer.
10
![Page 11: Paper crf design_tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042607/55a1108f1a28ab5a508b4806/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Quark User Interface QuarkXPress
6.5
This is a screen shot of Quark’s toolbar layout.
11
![Page 12: Paper crf design_tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042607/55a1108f1a28ab5a508b4806/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Quark example CRF QuarkXPress
6.5
This is Quark’s print-ready CRF with customized QuarkXTensions modules with a header and footer.
12
![Page 13: Paper crf design_tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042607/55a1108f1a28ab5a508b4806/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
TELEform User Interface
• Do you recognize the menu structure? • Some of TELEform’s toolbar buttons or icons are
identical to those you see in other Windows-based programs.
Go to Previous Page Go to Next PageFontDeletePrintSave
Choice FieldImage Zone
Comb Field
Constrained PrintField
Smart Text
TextRectangle
Horizontal/Vertical Line
TELEformDesigner
V8.1
This is a screen shot of TELEform’s toolbar layout.
13
![Page 14: Paper crf design_tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042607/55a1108f1a28ab5a508b4806/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
TELEform example CRF TELEformDesigner
V8.1
This is TELEform’s CRF in PDF format with Shape Library modules with a header and footer.
14
![Page 15: Paper crf design_tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042607/55a1108f1a28ab5a508b4806/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
2. Design Tool Key Features
2a.) Which key features are for you?
2b.) How do your features compare?
2c.) What are the overall Pros & Cons?
15
![Page 16: Paper crf design_tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042607/55a1108f1a28ab5a508b4806/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
2a.) Which key features are for you?
> Cost
> Print Layout Quality
> Usability
> Study Type
16
![Page 17: Paper crf design_tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042607/55a1108f1a28ab5a508b4806/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
2b.) How do your features compare?
• Expensive• Use form features
• Moderate price• Use design features
• Negligible • Use OC 4.5
Cost
• Print to PDF• PDF quality• Add software
• Print-ready• Excellent quality• Inclusive software
• Many steps• PDF quality• Add software
Print Layout Quality
• Training• Shape Library• Windows interface• Form Toolbar• Traditional order
• Training• XTensions modules• Windows interface• Form Controls• Traditional order
• Training• Global Library• OC interface • RDC & GLE • Build DB / CRF
Usability
• Paper• Electronic
• Paper• Electronic
• Paper• Electronic
StudyType
TELEformQUARKOCKEY Features
QuarkXPress
6.5
TELEformDesigner
v8.1
OC4.5
17
![Page 18: Paper crf design_tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042607/55a1108f1a28ab5a508b4806/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
• Cost• Add software• Only form design
• Cost• Library development• Creative design tool
• Usability• Add software• IT issues
Cons
• Form toolbar• Shape Library• Use form features
• Print Layout Quality• Usability• Inclusive software
• Cost• GLIB approved• Build DB / CRF
Pros
TELEformQUARKOC
2c.) What are the overall Pros & Cons?
OC4.5
QuarkXPress
6.5
TELEformDesigner
v8.1
18
![Page 19: Paper crf design_tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042607/55a1108f1a28ab5a508b4806/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
3. Develop & Maintain Your ‘CRF Library”
3a.) How do you establish and standardize a paper ‘CRF Library’?
3b.) How can paper CRFs consider DB design and reuse of OC’s GLIB objects?
3c.) Should paper CRFs match OC screenshots of the same CRF?
19
![Page 20: Paper crf design_tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042607/55a1108f1a28ab5a508b4806/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
3a.) How do you establish and standardize a paper ‘CRF Library’?
• Remember: Your CRF is designed to collect complete clinical trial study data and to ensure data standardization and consistency across all participating investigational sites.
• OC’s GLIB is separated by domain with standard objects in each domain. Your paper ‘CRF Library’ should be separated into these same domains (therapeutic area, compound, sponsor, etc.).
• A formal approval and / or Quality Control (QC) process should be in place for all new objects needed on a CRF.
• Adopt a naming convention - i.e. the CDISC (Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium)
20
![Page 21: Paper crf design_tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042607/55a1108f1a28ab5a508b4806/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
3b.) How can paper CRFs consider DB design and reuse of GLIB objects?
• Train CRF Designers in OC to BRIDGE the gap between paper CRF Design and OC DB Build
• Design the CRF with OC’s GLIB and with OC compatibility and restrictions in mind
• Matching the CRFs with OC’s objects easily promotes a standard ‘CRF Library’ and reuse of objects
• OC’s GLIB enforces standard questions and QG. Therefore, CRFs should enforce the same standards.
21
![Page 22: Paper crf design_tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042607/55a1108f1a28ab5a508b4806/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
BRIDGE between paper CRF Design and OC DB Build
BRIDGE the gap between both library’s objects:
Protocol CRF Design CRF Annotation / DB development
OC’s Global Library objects
‘CRF Library’objects
22
![Page 23: Paper crf design_tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042607/55a1108f1a28ab5a508b4806/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
3c.) Should paper CRFs match OC screenshots of the same CRF?
• Paper CRFs may or may not match the Data Entry (DE) screen.
• In many cases, DE guidelines and study-specific training are needed to avoid errors in DE.
• Benefits of the BRIDGE are:1. easier data entry with fewer errors. 2. less study-specific training and guidelines are
required.23
![Page 24: Paper crf design_tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042607/55a1108f1a28ab5a508b4806/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Example - Paper CRF Library object
Paper ‘CRF Library’object -
(PD)Repeating
group
24
![Page 25: Paper crf design_tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042607/55a1108f1a28ab5a508b4806/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Example - OC GLIB object
OC GLIB object –
(PD)Repeat
question 1 of 3
25
![Page 26: Paper crf design_tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042607/55a1108f1a28ab5a508b4806/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
4. Summary and Questions1. Form Design Software Assessment
1a.) What is form design software?1b.) What are the CRF format Pros & Cons?1c.) Which are the top technologies?
2. Design Tool Key Features 2a.) Which key features are for you?2b.) How do your features compare?2c.) What are the overall Pros & Cons?
3. Develop & Maintain Your ‘CRF Library”3a.) How do you establish and standardize a paper ‘CRF Library’?3a.) How can paper CRFs consider DB design and reuse of GLIB objects?3c.) Should paper CRFs match OC screenshots of the same CRF?
26