Panorama Mundial de FTTH / Fibra Hasta El Hogar ... · Panorama Mundial de FTTH / Fibra Hasta El...

Panorama Mundial de FTTH / Fibra Hasta El HogarTecnologías extrapolables entre

Redes de Acceso Residencial y LANs

Ing. Gilberto A. GuitarteFTTH COUNCIL AMÉRICAS- LATAM Chapter

Presidente

A quick tour on FTTH around the World

• US and CANADA

• EUROPE

• ASIA PAC

• MENA

• AFRICA

• LATAM

FTTH AROUND THE WORLD

• NORTH AMERICA (US and CANADA)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Sep

'01

Mar '0

2

Sep

'02

Mar '0

3

Sep

'03

Mar '0

4

Sep

'04

Mar '0

5

Sep

'05

Mar '0

6

Sep

'06

Mar '0

7

Sep

'07

Mar '0

8

Sep

'08

Mar '0

9

Sep

'09

Mar '1

0

Sep

'10

Mar '1

1

Sep

'11

Mar '1

2

Sep

'12

Mar '1

3

Sep

' 13

Homes Passed Homes Marketed Homes Connected

2013 Homes Passed: 27.7M

2013 Homes Connected: 12.5M

North American FTTH Growth

Source: RVA annual Provider & Consumer Studies

78.0%

11.4%

4.2%

2.6%

1.5%

1.1%

1.0%

0.3%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Tier 1 ILEC

Tier 2 & 3 ILEC

Muni/ PUD

Competitive Prov/ CLEC

Real Estate Dev

ILEC with CLEC Div

Cable TV/ MSO

Electric Co-Op

6

U.S. FTTH Connections By Provider Type

Source: RVA 2013 Provider & Consumer Studies

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

Sep

'01

Mar '0

2

Sep

'02

Mar '0

3

Sep

'03

Mar '0

4

Sep

'04

Mar '0

5

Sep

'05

Mar '0

6

Sep

'06

Mar '0

7

Sep

'07

Mar '0

8

Sep

'08

Mar '0

9

Sep

'09

Mar '1

0

Sep

'10

Mar '1

1

Sep

'11

Mar '1

2

Sep

'12

Mar '1

3

Sep

'13

FTTH Take RatesU.S. Take-Rates Versus Homes Marketed Reach 45.8%

Verizon Build Starts

Source: RVA annual Provider & Consumer Studies

81%

62%

52%

51%

48%

38%

31%

30%

25%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%100%

Real Estate Dev (Greenfield)

Cable TV/ MSO (Greenfield)

Competitive Prov/ CLEC Rural

ILEC Tier 2 & 3

Muni Retail Rural

Tier 1 ILEC Overbuild

Competitive Prov/ CLEC Urban/Suburban

Muni Retail Urban/Suburban

Muni Wholesale

8

FTTH Take-Rates Are Even Higher In Many CasesTake-Rates Vary From 25% To 81%

Source: RVA 2013 Provider Study


• EUROPE

FTTH/B European Ranking – end 2013

Household Penetrationof countries* with more than 1% household penetration

*Economies with at least 200,000 households

Source: IDATE for FTTH Council Europe, February 2014

European Region FTTH/B Forecast – end 2013

Source: Heavy Reading for FTTH Council Europe, February 2014Note: Fibre to the Home (FTTH) and Fibre to the Building (FTTB) Subcribers

www.gimmefibre.eu

4/11/2014 14

FTTH Conference 2015Warsaw 10-12 February 2015

www.ftthcouncil.eu


• ASIA PACIFIC

� Established in March 2005

� Currently has 75 members

� BoD, GM & 7 working committees

*Source : Ovum

Monique Morrow

(President)

Technology

&

Standards

Bernard Lee

Membership

Yoshihiro

Ishibashi

Education

&

Training

Xingfu He

Market

Intelligence

Anil Pande

Application

&

Solutions

Alexis

Bernadino

Emblem

H. Munasir

Choudhury

Planning,

Comms. &

Events

Zony Chen

1563New Users/Hour

US $60BWorth Projects in APAC

CHINA>100m FTTH users by 2017

17%CAGR 2011~2017

159.5MFTTH users by 2017

92.7MFTTH subscribers

Year-end 2013

*Source : Ovum

92.7 million FTTH subscribersAsia Pacific - year-end 2013

281.7 million wireline broadband subscribers

79 million FTTx subscribersAsia Pacific - year-end 2012

272.5 million wireline broadband subscribers

FTTH

Cable

ModemDSL

FTTH

Cable

Modem

DSL

29% 33%

63.6%59%

8%7.4%

+ 13.7 million

4%

0.6%4.6%

*Source : Ovum

FTTH leads the growth in wireline

broadband – beginning of DSL declineWill exceed 159 million subscribers in 2017

-7.12m

>100million

*Source : Ovum

FTTH is the major growth segment and

exceeds DSL in 2017Wireline broadband subscribers in Asia-Pacific will exceed 338 million in 2017

FTTH to overtake DSL in 2017

FTTH

DSL

*Source : Ovum

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

FT

TH

sub

scrib

ers

(000

s)

FT

TH

hou

seho

ld p

enet

ratio

n (%

)

FTTH household penetration, 2013 FTTH subscribers (000s), 2013

Growth Area

*Source : Ovum

FTTH growth analysis by country –

2013 to 2017 (Matured Markets)

� China will approach 100 million FTTH subscribers by 2017, a CAGR of 19% from 2013 to 2017. Even with significant growth, household penetration reaches only 25% in 2017.

� Japan – has been deploying FTTH for many years so growth rate is small. Expected to reach 70% household penetration in 2017.

� South Korea - has been deploying FTTH for many years so growth rate is small. Expected to reach 73% household penetration in 2017.

0

15,000

30,000

45,000

60,000

75,000

90,000

105,000

China Japan

FT

TH

sub

scrib

ers

(000

s)

2013 - FTTH

2017 - FTTH

0

3,000

6,000

9,000

12,000

15,000

South Korea Taiwan

FT

TH

Sub

scrib

ers

(000

s)

2013 - FTTH

2017 - FTTH

� Taiwan will continue to deploy FTTH and is expected to reach 59% household penetration in 2017.

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

Hong Kong India Malaysia Singapore Indonesia

FT

TH

Sub

scrib

ers

(000

s)

2013 - FTTH 2017 - FTTH

*Source : Ovum

� Hong Kong – growth continues at slower rate given already high household penetration. Expected to reach household penetration of 82% in 2017.

� India – high growth from very low base; household penetration remains low in 2017.

� Malaysia – deployments continue with household penetration expected to reach 21% in 2017.

� Singapore – deployments continues with household penetration expected to reach 81% in 2017.

� Indonesia – high growth from very low base; household penetration remains low in 2017.

FTTH growth analysis by country –

2013 to 2017 (Developing Market)

*Source : Ovum

� Vietnam – growth from small base, household penetration expected to reach 2.6% in 2017.

� Australia – major change in NBN plan likely, thereby limiting FTTH deployments.

� New Zealand – high growth, household penetration expected to approach 29% in 2017.

� Thailand – growth from small base, household penetration expected to reach 2.5% in 2017.

� Remaining countries – some growth in FTTH but forecasted subscriber bases will be small.

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Vietnam Australia New Zealand Thailand Bangladesh Pakistan Philippines

FTT

H S

ub

scri

be

rs (

00

0s)

2013 - FTTH 2017 - FTTH

FTTH growth analysis by country – 2013

to 2017 (Potential Growth Market)

Drivers for FTTH in APAC• Demography: a huge market potential

• India and China are the most populated countries in the world (APAC >50%)• MDUs are dominating in large cities especially in China• Asia Pacific’s FTTH/B subscriber base will grow to 160 million at year-end 2017.

• Low competition from other networks• As in Eastern Europe, the “quality gap” between copper and fibre networks is

important: end users will need fibre for higher bandwidth• Cablecos are less dominating the broadband market than in Europe or in the US…

but it could change (SARFT in China)

• A key driver for mass market migration in APAC: NBN programs

• Incumbents leading rollouts in APAC but also some free room for new entrants• Some incumbents are deeply involved in national FTTH/B deployments (Malaysia)• New entrants in large countries (India) or in challenging markets (Vietnam)

• APAC Mobile centric countries will need fibre also: LTE Backhaul

FTTH Council Asia-Pacific Annual Conference 3-5 June 2014, Penang, Malaysia

www.ftthcouncilapevents.com

www.ftthcouncilap.org


• MENA and AFRICA

FTTH in the MENA region

Christine BeylouniDirector General, FTTH Council MENA

Our Committees

Market Development &

Intelligence Committee

Chaired by Suleiman Al-Hedaithy

latest FTTH market data and evolution of

FTTH/FTTB of the MENA region.

Policy & Regulatory

Committee

Chaired by Toni Al-Makdissi

follow and lobby relevant policy and

regulatory developments in the

MENA region in terms of broadband

deployment and FTTH roll-out .

Technology & Training

Committee

Chaired by Gamal Hegazi

the pillar for promoting FTTH in the MENA region

with an agnostic view of the FTTH

technology and the know-how through its

certified training.

Smart Cities Apps &Ops MENA

Chaired by Richard Jones

The committee’s mission is to accelerate

deployment of ultra high-speed FTTH – highlighting deployment approaches,

applications and the benefits for Smart Cities, campuses and other real estate developments in

the MENA region.

Our Partners and Advisors

The FTTH Market in MENA

UAE Leads the Global Ranking for the 2nd year

33

˃More than 43 FTTH/B projects in MENA at Sept 2013

FTTH/B in MENA – Overview

Source: IDATE for FTTH Council MENA

Total FTTH/B Homes passed in MENA at September 201 3

Incumbents Municipalities / Utilities Alternative op erators / ISPs Housing companies / Nat. Prog.

2 502 000 150 000 315 400 134 300

80.7% 4.8% 10.2% 4.3%

Incumbents and Alternative operators are the main a ctors involved in FTTH/B rollout

National programs should boost FTTH/B market in MEN A

34

FTTH/B in MENA – Overall Figures

In September 2013

> 1,295,090 FTTH/B subscribers

> 3,106,000 FTTH/B Homes Passed

Source: IDATE for FTTH Council MENA

Average Penetration Rate : 41.7%(from 43.5% at September 2012)

YoY growth

- Subscribers: +65.5%

- Homes Passed: +72.5%

35

˃ 2 countries with significant rollouts, more than 1 million Homes Passed

Source: IDATE for FTTH Council MENA Chapter

0

200,000

400,000

600,000

800,000

1,000,000

1,200,000

1,400,000

1,600,000

UAE Saudi Arabia Qatar Oman Egypt Iraq Algeria Lebanon Kuwait Bahrain

Most advanced FTTH/B projects

Hugedynamism

Status Quo

Main trends in MENA’s FTTH/B market

Next – Dubai 2014

www.ftthcouncilmena.org

DUBAI, 18 -20 November 2014

October 29-292014

Turbine Hall,Newtown, Jozi

(Johannesburg)South Africa

FTTH COUNCIL AFRICA


LATAM

42

% FTTH/B Homes Passed in total Households

• Number of Homes Passed not representative of effective coverage • Here, the ratio represented is % of FTTH/B Homes Passed in total households

– 1 country > 60% !!!

– 2 countries > 10%– 3 countries > 5% Brazil: 6%

Argentina: 10%

Mexico: 14%

Uruguay: 63%

Chile: 5%

Top 6 countries in terms of % of FTTH/B Homes Passed in total households

Source: IDATE for FTTH Council LATAM Chapter

Costa Rica: 5%

43

˃ Regarding technology, players have mainly chosen GPON

˃ In December 2013, the main architecture deployed is pure FTTH


FTTH/B LATAM technologies


FTTH 91%FTTB 9%

Dec 2013Main architecture deployed

(homes passed segmentation)

PON 96%Ethernet 4%

Dec 2013Main technology deployed

(homes passed segmentation)

44

FTTH/B in LATAM – Overall Figures

In December 2013

> ~1.75 million FTTH/B subscribers

> 10.23 million FTTH/B Homes Passed


⇒ Average Penetration Rate: 17.1%(+3.7 points compared to Dec 2012)

⇒ Growth Rates Dec 2013/Dec 2012:

� Subscribers: +136%

� Homes passed: +85%

45

˃ Nearly 6.5 million subscribers for about 48.5 million Homes Passed in 2018 (1)


FTTH/B LATAM market from 2013 to 2018

(1): 17 countries studied + Nicaragua, Peru, Venezuela

•Costo de láser de Central distribuído

entre varios usuarios

Red Punto a Punto:un láser de Central

y una fibra por cada abonado

Red Punto a Multipunto:Un láser de central

entre varios abonados (32 o 64)

12

3132

12

3132

12

3132

1 1:32

OLT 1

1:8

1:2

1:4ONT3

ONT1

ONT2

ONT4

ONT5

ONT6

ONT7ONT8

1:4

ONT9ONT10ONT11

CO

3 granjeros lejanos

3 PYMES lejanas

5 residenciascercanas

InnovaciónInnovaciónInnovaciónInnovación…….…….…….…….RedesRedesRedesRedes de de de de AccesoAccesoAccesoAccesoFTTH FTTH FTTH FTTH ----PON PON PON PON InnovaciónInnovaciónInnovaciónInnovación…….…….…….…….RedesRedesRedesRedes de de de de AccesoAccesoAccesoAccesoFTTH FTTH FTTH FTTH ----PON PON PON PON

48

Parque Industrial

Edificio Comercial

Zona Comercial

Edificios de Oficina

Residencial

Corporativo

Móviles

CHILE

ONTON

TONT

ONT

2:8

2:4

1:8

1:8

1:8

1:8

ONT

ONT

ONT

ONT

ONT

ONT

ONT

ONT

ONT

ONT

ONT

ONT

ONT

ONT

ONT

ONT

ONT ON

T ONT ON

T

ONTON

TONTON

T

ONTON

TONTON

T

ONT

ONT

ONT

ONT

ONT

1:4

1:4

1:4

1:41:4

1:4ONTON

T

ONT

ONT

ONT

ONTON

T

ONT

ONT

ONT

ONT

ONT

ONT

ONT

ONT

ONT

ONT

1

2

3

4

1

2

3

4OLT

MPLS

EPCS

MPLS

Entel PE

PE

Esquema Despliegue Red GPON

• OLT soporta 14 tarjetas PON con 4 puertas c/u.• 24 zonas de servicio por OLT, considerando 2 tarjet as para E1.• 4 zonas de servicio por cada 2 tarjetas PON

• Uplink MPLS de 1 Gbps para PCS• Uplink MPLS de 1 Gbps para Entel S.A.

1 Gbps

1 Gbps

2,5/1,24 Gbps

2,5/1,24 Gbps

L1

L2

L3

L4

L5

L6

L7

L8

Fiber to the Office

Key Terms

• PON - Passive Optical Network- (Carrier) Between Central Office (CO), or substation, and the premises in FTTx.

Campus MDF

• POL - Passive Optical Local Area Network

- (Enterprise) Between the data center / equipment room and the user*.

PON / POL are a point-to-multipoint network architecture in which unpowered optical splitters are used to enable a single optical fiber to serve multiple premises / users

GPON (Gigabit PON) is an evolution of the BPON standard - based on the ITU standard (ITU-G.984)Asymmetrical bandwidth 2.4Gbs / 1.25Gbs

Fundamentally GPON is the common demoninator for PO N and POL

Overarching technology

A thought to begin with…

“If you always do what you always did, you will always get what you always got.”

Keeping pace with the many changes in ITKeeping pace with the many changes in IT

Change has been to main driver for most enterprises in the last decade

Bandwidth requirements have increased by order of magnitude

Numbers and type of devices connected has also jumped dramatically

Traffic patterns have shifted to more centralised and cloud based

Ironically It’s all happened in an economic environment that gives IT much less to spend.

And yet costly work groups switch based architectur e are built the same way

Main Factors for Change

• Rethinking of the physical infrastructure / abandoning old assumptions

• Re-evaluation of the way the LAN architecture is deployed

• Re-consideration of processes and vendors

• Alignment of IT to the business agenda

Gradually an increasing number of enterprises are a bandoning some of the assumption they used to make and start looking at alternatives

IT architectures are changing and therefore the network architecture has to adapt with it .

Evolution of network technologies …departmental and distributed services vs. to centralised resources into the Data Center or even into the cloud

Emerging trend where intelligence and functionality features are centralised back to a single location or aggregation

Think of Wireless LAN…. Where a relative number of non-intelligent access points feed-up into centralised controllers that provide all the intelligence and functionality for the whole wireless LAN

Now think of GPON as the other disruptive technology where again we are using passive technology down to the desktop and then centralise a lot of the intelligence at the aggregation or core layer within that architecture.

Game changer & Disruptive Technology

Taking unnecessary intelligence and functionality a way from the edgein order to create a more efficient architecture

POL Market DriversPOL Market Drivers

• Functionality

– Understand business requirements

– Rethink and revaluate old assumptions

• Financial

– Reconsider procurement

– What business problem does it solve?

• Operational

– Improve efficiency / increase security / reduce OPEX

GPON Evolution

The success of the OSP system has created an opport unity to bring the same system design into the enterprise LAN

POL Facts and Benefits

• No power required from the data center to the user area

• Multiple buildings served by one main equipment room

• Up to 50% reduction in power consumption

• Significantly reduced cabling construction costs

• Reduced bulk allow for more flexible architectural

design considerations

• Uses a single strand of single-mode graded fiber.

• Technically Future Proof (Passive Components)

- SM fiber has an unknown bandwidth limitation.

- Upgrades to the next generation are as simple as replacing the electronics (More on that later)

• Lower future expansion costs

POL Facts and Benefits

Optical Line Terminal Optical Network Terminal

Traditional POL Architecture

PASSIVE(No Power Required)

GPON details

Active Components – Located in the MDF

• Optical Line Terminal – OLT –- Located in the Data Center

- After the Level-3 WAN router

- Uses GPON protocols

- Support VLAN (over 4500)

- 128-bit security encryption

Different vendors provide OLT solutions based on sa me ITU984 standard

Active Components – Located at the desktop area

• Optical Network Terminal - ONT

- Located near the user or device

- 4 RJ45 (10/100/1000) output ports with optional POE

- Up to 62W* of available POE

- Standard HVAC is adequate

- Optional internal or external battery back-up.

- Up to 8 VLAN per port and a max of 16 VLAN per ONT*

*Vendor Specific

Different vendors provide ONT devises from desk-top to wall-mount - proprietary solution –

Traditional LAN vs. PON

Traditional LAN Optical LAN

IDF Office SpaceMDF

Basic Premise of Passive Optical LAN

Floor n

Access

Switches

WLAN

Short

CAT-5/6

Core

Router

Distribution

Switch

Copper-based

Ethernet LAN

56PON

Ports

4-port

Work Group

Terminals

Fiber 8

Fiber 1

PON 1

PON x

GPON

Layer2

Switch

WAN

Floor 1

Access

SwitchesShort

CAT-5/6

PassiveOptical LAN

Long

CAT-5/6

Long

CAT-5/6

Fiber 32

Fiber 1

WLAN

7000+Ethernet

Ports

Served4

8

1700+WGT’s

Fire Suppression

3

2

Heavy Duty Cable Trays


UPS

AC

HVAC

Multi-Mode Fiber

Single-Mode

Fiber

(20km reach)

Light weight or no Cable Trays


Long PoE

Cables

Long PoE

Cables

Short PoE

Cables

Short PoE

Cables

88

8

20 kilometre

Splitter Technology

• Splitters are passive components representing an important role in Passive Optical Networks

• Two types used:• Fused Biconilcal Taper (FBT) – old technology• Planar Lightwave Circuit (PLC) – latest technology

• Multiple input (M) and multiple output (N) – 1x2 / 1x8 / 1x16 / 1x32 / 2x32

• PLC Splitter, based on silica optical waveguide technology and precision aligning process

• Theoretical loss for a 1x32 is 15db – good PLC splitter provide <16.5db

Optical LAN Link Budgets

April 11, 2014 67

• The maximum PON distance is limited primarily by optical attenuation. Contributors are fiber lossattenuation and PON splitter attenuation.

• Optical LAN loss budges must be between 8dB and 28dB; meaning smaller split ratios mayrequire an inline attenuator to insert more loss.

PONSplitter

Fiber loss per km is 0.35 dB (1260 - 1360 nm)

Every time the signal is split two ways, halfthe power goes one way and half goes theother. So each direction gets half thepower, or the signal is reduced by

10log(0.5)=3 dB

Practical loss is 3.5 dB nominal, so everytwo-way split costs about 10 km distance@ 1310 nm

HalfPower

HalfPower

Attenuator Loss Unit

Optical Loss 1310 nm 0.35 dB / Km



Splice Loss per unit 0.05 dB

Connector Loss 0.35 dB

1X32 PON Splitter 16.7 dB




1:2 split ratio

GPON Optical Budget –• Splitter (1:32) = 16.5 dB• Fiber loss (20km) = 7.0 dB• Connector / Splice loss = 3.5 dB

27.0 dB

Bandwidth Comparison GPON vs Copper LANBandwidth Comparison GPON vs Copper LAN

Cisco Catalyst 4948 10/100/1000BASE-T

Vs

With 1Gbps Uplink to aggregation layer:- 1G / 48ports = 20Mbps available per user

With 10Gbps Uplink to aggregation layer:- 10G / 48ports = 208Mbps available per user

With 1/32 splitter

DS 2.48Gbps = 77Mbps available per ONTUS 1.5Gbps = 46Mbps available per ONT

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

Estimated Peak Bandwidth per User (Kbps)

2000 to 2013

Quelle: March 2013 – Gartner Research —How Cloud, Mobile and Video Will Increase Enterprise Bandwidth Needs Through 2017

Tech Forum „Verkabelung - Netze - Infrastruktur”

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Base Low Cloud Med. Cloud High Cloud High Video Super User

Projected Peak Bandwidth per User 2017

(in Kbps)

Bandwidth Usage Projections in the LANBandwidth Usage Projections in the LAN

PON Key Elements: Cable Deployment ReductionPON Key Elements: Cable Deployment Reduction

Optical LAN Requires this much cable

Green Benefits Reduction in non-renewable materials

Reduction in cabling costs

Reduction in power consumption

Floor space savings

Ceiling space and weight

May 11, 2012 Revised Directive

POL Users Today

Hospitals

Campuses

Universities

Cruise Ships

Hotels (Large)

Government and Military

High Occupancy Buildings (Call Centers)

Multi-Tenant Units (Commercial and Residential)

• Choose Fast & Easy (reduce installation time)

• Flexibility of deployment (knowing exact distance not a key factor)

• Extra slack does not affect performance (fiber has low loss

per km)

• Pre-Terminated cable assemblies: pre-tested at the

factory(save time on installation and testing)

• 25-year warranty certifications

Fiber Deployment Strategies

4/11/2014

Standard Bodies UpdateStandard Bodies Update

In February 2009, the Telecommunications Industry Association TR-42 Engineering Committee published TIA-568-C.1, which was the first revision to recognize duplex single-mode fiber for use in the horizontal.

On August 14, 2012, TR-42 issued an addendum to the TIA-568-C.0 Generic Telecommunications Cabling for Customer Premises standard that adds POL technology standards as supported single-mode fiber applications for the LAN.

Note : POL added to 13th Edition of TDMM – Chapter 5 Horizontal Cabling

Sandia National Laboratory

Case StudyCase Study

- Cross country high data rate

- 65% energy savings / 1 million KWH over 5Y

- 13000 users across 265 buildings

- Real estate savings

- 50% CAPEX reduction when compared to traditional Ethernet installation

- 12M$ savings over 5Y

IDF Office SpaceMDF

Floor n

Access

Switches

WLAN

Core

Router

Distribution

Switch

Copper-based

Ethernet LAN

Enterprise

Aggregation

Switch

WAN

Floor 1

Access

Switches

Long

CAT-5/6

Long

CAT-5/6

WLANFire Suppression



UPS

AC

HVAC

Multi-Mode Fiber

Long PoE

Cables

Long PoE

Cables

IDF

Passive Optical LAN

Office SpaceMDF

Floor n

WLAN

Short

CAT-5/6

Core

Router

4-port

Work Group

Terminals

PON 1

PON x

WAN

Floor 1

Short

CAT-5/6

Fiber 32

Fiber 1

WLAN

3

2

3

2

Single-Mode

Fiber

(20km reach)


IDF


Short PoE

Cables

Short PoE

Cables

OLT

Fiber 32

Fiber 1

Design for 500 user system

PowerPowerPowerPower

HVACHVACHVACHVAC

RackingRackingRackingRacking

UPSUPSUPSUPS

Workgroup switchesWorkgroup switchesWorkgroup switchesWorkgroup switches*** (1) 144 port FDH and (6) 24 port *** (1) 144 port FDH and (6) 24 port *** (1) 144 port FDH and (6) 24 port *** (1) 144 port FDH and (6) 24 port

FDTs per floorFDTs per floorFDTs per floorFDTs per floor

HomeHomeHomeHome----run cabling run cabling run cabling run cabling *** Up to 75 foot fiber drops from the *** Up to 75 foot fiber drops from the *** Up to 75 foot fiber drops from the *** Up to 75 foot fiber drops from the

FDT to the desktopFDT to the desktopFDT to the desktopFDT to the desktop

Enterprise MultiEnterprise MultiEnterprise MultiEnterprise Multi----service service service service Router in Data CenterRouter in Data CenterRouter in Data CenterRouter in Data Center

REQUIRESYES NO

IN1 or 2 OUT

32

1 x 32 or

2 x 32

FMT Splitter Panel

• Main Distribution Room• Front application IN/OUT• Rackable 1U

IN OUT

Rapid Fiber Distribution Terminal (FDT)

Reel – MPO/SC APCLength from 100 to 500 Feet

• Zone Area• Plug & Play

1

12 or 24

MPO to 12 SC APC

MPO to MPO trunk

Mini RDT

External reel – MPO/SC APCLength from 200 to 650 FeetInternal reel – MPO/SC APC

Length up to 100 Feet

• Zone Area• Plug & Play

1

12

MPO to 12 SC APC

SC couplers

MPO to MPO trunk

Fiber Splitter Box (FSB)• Zone • Plug & Play• 1 x 32 or 2 x 32 Splitter1 x 32

or 2 x 32

1 X 32

SC couplers

83

CONCLUSIONES:

• La Tecnología PON, es Madura en redes de acceso a nivel mundial,y es disruptiva en LANs

• Presenta ventajas importantes desde el punto de vista CAPEX/OPEX

• Presenta ventajas importantes para el medio ambiente por su bajo perfil energético

• Sencillo de diseñar por ser una red pasiva

• Simple de construir con sistemas de despliegue modulares ultra-rápidos

….ya es hora de un Nuevo Cambio!!!

“Locura: hacer lo mismo una y otra vez, en forma repetitiva, y esperar resultadosdiferentes”

Un pensamiento para el cierre…

¡GRACIAS!

Panorama Mundial de FTTH / Fibra Hasta El Hogar ... · Panorama Mundial de FTTH / Fibra Hasta El...

Documents

Transcript of Panorama Mundial de FTTH / Fibra Hasta El Hogar ... · Panorama Mundial de FTTH / Fibra Hasta El...