Iniciativas para reducir las emisiones de carbono derivadas de la ...
PANAMA MARITIME IX Initiatives to reduce toxic gas emissions: perspective of the shipping companies....
-
Upload
maria-ware -
Category
Documents
-
view
226 -
download
1
Transcript of PANAMA MARITIME IX Initiatives to reduce toxic gas emissions: perspective of the shipping companies....
PANAMA MARITIME IX
Initiatives to reduce toxic gas emissions: Initiatives to reduce toxic gas emissions: perspective of the shipping companies.perspective of the shipping companies.
Iniciativas para reducir las emisiones de Iniciativas para reducir las emisiones de gases tóxicos: perspectiva de las navierasgases tóxicos: perspectiva de las navieras
Peter M. Swift, MD, INTERTANKO
TANKERS
US“Я”
INTERTANKO – the Voice of the Tanker Industry INTERTANKO – the Voice of the Tanker Industry International Association of Independent Tanker Owners
INTERTANKO represents approximately 80% of the international oil and chemical fleet
MISSION• To provide leadership to the Tanker Industry in serving the world
with safe, environmentally sound and efficient seaborne transportation of oil, gas and chemical products
VISION FOR THE TANKER INDUSTRY• A responsible, sustainable, respected Tanker Industry,
committed to continuous improvement and constructively influencing its future
ONE OF THE ASSOCIATION’S PRIMARY GOALS• Lead the continuous improvement of the Tanker Industry’s
performance in striving to achieve the goals of:Zero fatalities, Zero pollution, Zero detentions
Round Table of international shipping associationsRound Table of international shipping associations BIMCO, ICS, INTERCARGO, INTERTANKOBIMCO, ICS, INTERCARGO, INTERTANKO
Congratulate the
Panama Maritime Authority
on
Achieving ISO 9001:2000 certification
and
Successful completion of the
IMO voluntary Flag State Audit
PANAMA MARITIME IX
Industry delivering on the Industry delivering on the
Environmental ChallengesEnvironmental Challenges
A GOOD NEWS STORY A GOOD NEWS STORY
TANKER SHIPPING A GOOD NEWS STORYTANKER SHIPPING A GOOD NEWS STORY
OIL POLLUTION IN 2008A RECORD LOW
Since records began in 1970
TANKER SHIPPING A GOOD NEWS STORYTANKER SHIPPING A GOOD NEWS STORY All tanker incidents and accidental pollution
Number of incidentsNumber of incidents
0
210
420
630
840
1050
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
0
120
240
360
480
600
Misc
Security
Fire/Expl
Hull & Machinery
Grounded
Coll/Contact
Oil pollution
000 ts spills000 ts spills
Upward trend in number of incidents reversed, while trade continues to rise
TANKER SHIPPING A GOOD NEWS STORYTANKER SHIPPING A GOOD NEWS STORY
Gasoline price at the pump (Dec08/Jan09)
Dollars per litreDollars per litre
Freight cost remains a fraction of delivered cost of oil
0.00
0.30
0.60
0.90
1.20
1.50
USA Japan Germany UK
Long haul freight rate
Marketing*
Oil price
Tax
.
Sources: IEA/Baltic Exchange
Initiatives to Reduce Air EmissionsInitiatives to Reduce Air Emissions
The Good News ContinuesThe Good News Continues
• IMO MARPOL Annex VI Revisions and NOx Technical Code adopted in 2008
• Good progress at IMO on measures to reduce Green House Gas emissions
Annex VI Revisions andAnnex VI Revisions andNOx Technical Code 2008NOx Technical Code 2008
• SOx , and hence also Particulate Matter, emissions will be lowered progressively: 0.5% fuel limit globally by 2020 (latest 2025) from current 4.5% and 0.1% in Emission Control Areas from current 1.5 % by 2015
• New NOx limits on existing engines and progressively stricter limits on new engines
Marine fuel oil quality will be further improvedMarine fuel oil quality will be further improved
Further initiatives – More ECAs (?)
Planned new ECA for 2013
Could be extended to entire N. A.
Up to 200 nm on the West Coast
Plan to require 0.1% or 0.2% S fuels
Revision of MARPOL Annex VI (Pollutants)DRIVERS FOR CHANGE
• Driven by governments– IMO member states “prepared” since Convention adopted
in 1997– Environmental impact often local/regional rather than
global– EU Sulphur Directive in 1999 & Thematic studies (2000+)
set unilateral challenge– California (2005) led US programmes– Local legislation emerged in Norway et al, and pending in
Japan et al• Environmental Lobby coordinated and effective• Shipping Industry support initially very limited
– Only a few pro-active, most reactive, some very negative• Economic drivers mostly negative
– Extra costs for refiners and owners
AND MORE GOOD NEWSAND MORE GOOD NEWSReductions in VOC Emissions
• Tanker industry introduced voluntary measures to reduce VOC emissions from cargo on passage in 2002 – cutting these by approximately 80%
• MARPOL Annex VI revisions incorporated these in 2008, and take effect in 2010
Initiatives to ReduceInitiatives to ReduceGreen House Gas EmissionsGreen House Gas Emissions
Shipping has a head start as the most Shipping has a head start as the most energy efficient means of transportenergy efficient means of transport
15
COCO22 Emissions per Unit Load Emissions per Unit Load
by Transport Modeby Transport Mode
Source: Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (Japan): The Survey on Transport Energy 2001/2002 MOL (Japan): Environmental and Social Report 2004
Large Tanker
Large Containership
Railway
Coastal Carrier
Small-size Commercial Truck
Airplane
Standard-size Commercial Truck
100 200 300 400
398
226
49
11
6
3
1
0
Units Relative
Shipping energy efficient
TANKER SHIPPING A GOOD NEWS STORYTANKER SHIPPING A GOOD NEWS STORY Shipping’s GREEN Credentials
• This car, weighing one tonne, uses 1 litre of fuel to move 20 kms
• This oil tanker uses 1 litre of fuel to move one tonne of cargo 2,500 kms
– more than twice as far as 20 years ago
One particular challenge for the shipping industry- i.e. seaborne trade will continue to grow strongly
Source: Fearnleys/INTERTANKO
IndexIndex
80
100
120
140
160
180
19
80
19
81
19
82
19
83
19
84
19
85
19
86
19
87
19
88
19
89
19
90
19
91
19
92
19
93
19
94
19
95
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
Population
Energy use
Seaborne trade
CO2 emission
There has been strong growth in shipping
Trends – Population, Energy Use, Seaborne trade & CO2 emissions
Reductions in GHG (CO2) EmissionsDRIVERS FOR CHANGE
• Driven hardest by a limited number of governments– Supported mostly by EU governments, plus Japan,
Australia, Canada and a few others– Until recently only limited support in US (mostly
environmental interests)– Relatively little enthusiasm in much of the developing
world, but now changing ?• Environmental Lobby growing
– But not yet fully coordinated• Maritime industries showing considerable support
– Proactive involvement – Although “hesitant” on market based instruments
• Economic incentives strong– Fuel savings translate into potentially significant cost
savings; plus incentives for innovation & new technologies
Initiatives underway at the IMOInitiatives underway at the IMO
1998: IMO initiated work on Green House Gas emissions 2003: IMO Assembly adopted Resolution A.963(23): Policies and Practices Related to the Reduction of GHG from ShipsToday: Work continues through the MEPC
This year: we can confidently expect MEPC 59 to adopt -
• Mandatory Design Index for new ships (long term measure)
• Ship Efficiency Management Plan – existing ships:- Best practices to save energy used by the ship- Use of voluntary Operational Index (for each voyage & over a period of time/voyages)
Initiatives underway at the IMOInitiatives underway at the IMO
Ship Performance Index: CO2 / work done
e.g. tonnes of CO2 produced per tonne mile of cargo
• Energy efficiency design index for new ships incentivises designers and builders. At the next stage: The ship’s design index should be less than a maximum limit to be set by regulations.The maximum value will then be lowered over time.
• Voluntary operating index measures efficiency of ship in service.A management tool for owners and charterers to measure energy efficiency on a voyage. Incentivises the owner to keep hull and machinery “clean” and charterer to use the ship efficiently – capacity, routing and speed.
SEMP: Examples of Best PracticesSEMP: Examples of Best Practicesfor tanker emissions & energy efficiencyfor tanker emissions & energy efficiency
1. Programme for Measuring and Monitoring Ship Efficiency2. Voyage Optimization Programme
1. Speed selection optimization2. Optimised route planning3. Trim Optimization
3. Propulsion Resistance Management Programme1. Hull Resistance2. Propeller Resistance
4. Machinery Optimisation Programme1. Main Engine monitoring and optimisation2. Optimisation of lubrication as well as other machinery and equipment
5. Cargo Handling Optimization1. Cargo vapours control procedure on all crude tankers (80-90% reduction of
cargo vapours)2. Cargo temperature control optimization
6. Energy Conservation Awareness Plan1. On board and on shore training and familiarisation of company’s efficiency
programme2. Accommodation-specific energy conservation programme
162
168
174
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 % SMCR
Engineshaft power
SFO
C
ME/ME-C 100% SMCR optimised
MC/MC-C 100% SMCR optimised
ME/ME-C Part load optimised
3-4g/kWh
Economy mode:
3-4g/kWh
IMO is also reviewing possible economic IMO is also reviewing possible economic measures to reduce COmeasures to reduce CO22 emissions emissions
• Bunker Levy /Compensation Scheme• Emissions Trading Scheme• Other, e.g. differentiated charges
Industry has established Guiding principles and believe any measure should:
• Be effective in reducing global GHG emissions• Be binding on and applicable to all ships• Be cost effective• Not distort competition• Support sustainable environmental development without
penalising trade growth• Promote technical innovation and leading technologies• Be practical, transparent, fraud-free, easy to administer
Initiatives already under wayInitiatives already under way- parallel voluntary measures- parallel voluntary measures
For most ship types, some form of :• Speed optimisation• Voyage optimisation• Capacity optimisation
is already in hand.
For Tankers:• Liaison is encouraged between owners and charterers to optimise vessel speed and voyage schedules
http://www.ocimf.com/view_document.cfm?id=1147
Other initiatives under discussionOther initiatives under discussion
Pending the setting of mandatory upper limits for the Energy Efficiency Design Index of new ships, the tanker industry is discussing:
• The Establishment of a Reference Value for a New Ship (i.e. a Target)
• Development of a Rating System relative to the Reference Value
Similar to the performance rating of white goods
Other initiatives already under wayOther initiatives already under way- parallel voluntary measures- parallel voluntary measures
Ports / terminals
• Incentivised to improve port efficiency• Reward environmentally friendly ships with lower port
dues
Industry is currently developing a Port Efficiency IndexA Performance Indicator* of ship-port efficiency
measuring: Total CO2/ Unit of Cargo handled from arrival to
departure
*i.e. an extension of the IMO New Ship Design Index / Operational Index [ & similarly for SOx, NOx & VOC emissions]
The Good News continues….The Good News continues….
The Shipping Industry is committed to playing its part in finding solutions to reduce Green
House Gas emissions.
Industry:• Taking a pro-active approach to reductions in CO2
emissions• Encouraging innovation to improve performance• Continues to support global trade• Encourages modal shift to shipping to reduce overall
emissions
THANK YOU / GRACIAS
“Proud of our people, Proud of our ships”
For more information, please visit:
www.intertanko.com www.poseidonchallenge.com
www.shippingfacts.comwww.maritimefoundation.com