Paliyas at Madhutra, Patan District, Gujarat, India · year, on the next day of Dipavali, which is...
Transcript of Paliyas at Madhutra, Patan District, Gujarat, India · year, on the next day of Dipavali, which is...
Paliyas at Madhutra, Patan District, Gujarat, India
Tanmay Goswami1, Vrushab Mahesh1 and Rajesh S. V. 2
1. Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, The Maharaja Sayajirao
University of Baroda, Vadodara – 390 002, Gujarat, India (Email:
[email protected]; [email protected]) 2. Department of Archaeology, University of Kerala, Kariavattom Campus,
Thiruvananthapuram ‐ 695581, Kerala, India (Email: [email protected])
Received: 09 August 2017; Revised: 16 September 2017; Accepted: 24 October 2017
Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology 5 (2017): 1001‐1012
Abstract: Paliyas constitute a definite type of memorial set up to commemorate individuals who are
perceived to have met with a heroic death in Rajasthan and Gujarat, India and Sindh, Pakistan. The
memorial type is little understood in terms of its origin, chronology and significance amongst the local
populace. The paper in this regard presents the results of investigations undertaken amongst the paliyas
found in Madhutra, Santalpur taluka, Patan District, Gujarat, as a case study and highlights the
typological variations within them, symbolic traits represented in the sculpted panels and associated
cultural practices. In addition, it also stresses upon the utility of the study of oral traditions as a tool to
understand the role of memorials as commemorative markers and regulators of kinship and social ties.
Keywords: Paliya, Memorials, Hero Memorials, Sati Memorials, Heroic Death,
Sahagamana, Anugamana
Introduction Commemorating the dead has been a tradition that characterized most cultures across
the world since ancient times. The practice of setting up of memorials as
commemorative markers in this regard serve as tangible reflections of such concerns.
Although a tradition that is visible across the world, the form of the memorial, the
nature of commemorations, their nomenclature, tentative chronologies, purpose of
erection and associated cultural practices vary. In addition, whilst certain memorials
are sepulchral in nature, often serving as epitaphs, a few memorial types are non‐
sepulchral and are purely commemorative in character.
Amongst the various materials used for the making of the memorials, the use of stone
constitutes the most popular medium across the world. Its popularity is perhaps due to
it being the most commonly occurring durable material. Since early times, stone
monuments called megaliths have been built/set up to commemorate the dead,
although, its precise association with the funerary rites along with its sepulchral
character has been debated (for instance, Kapp 1985; Brubaker 2000; Rao et.al. 2011). In
ISSN 2347 – 5463 Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology 5: 2017
1002
this paper, however, a distinction has been made between the memorials and
megaliths, wherein a memorial is taken to represent a non‐sepulchral and
commemorative edifice, raised in memory or honour of the deceased, whose setting up
may or may not have formed a part of the funerary rites. Whilst such characteristics
can be established to the memorials datable to the historical periods on the basis of the
sculptural depictions, engraved inscriptions and literary evidence, it is difficult at this
stage to precisely establish the character of the megalithic remains due to the lack of
definite evidence. Under such circumstances, the paper restricts the currency of the
term ‘memorials’ to exclude the megalithic remains.
In the Indian subcontinent, the memorials datable to the historical periods are
generally comprising of the following types, viz. (a) memorials commemorating
individuals killed during battle, skirmishes, and hunts or by wild animals, which are
often referred to as hero memorials; (b) memorials commemorating acts of self‐
immolations of women, commonly referred to as sati memorials; (c) memorials
commemorating individuals who laid down their life through sectarian practices and
(d) memorials commemorating individuals who undertook self‐immolatory measures
to end their lives, whose actions did not confirm to sectarian practice and were
perceived to have been undertaken for the benefit of the society or one’s overlord.
However, there is no uniform nomenclature to designate these memorials across the
Indian subcontinent. In the absence of uniform nomenclature they continue to be
referred to in vernacular nomenclature, for instance, in peninsular and southern India,
the memorials are referred to as viragals, mastikals and nishidhis; and in Gujarat, and
Rajasthan, India and Sindh, Pakistan, the memorials are referred to as paliyas, khambhas
and chatris. The current paper whilst identifying such variations, presents the results of
our investigations which sought to examine the typological variations in the memorials
and ethnographic practices associated with them at Madhutra, Santalpur taluka, Patan
District, Gujarat (Figure 1).
Paliyas The memorials in the region of Gujarat and Rajasthan in India and Sindh in Pakistan
are vernacularly referred to as paliyas, khambha and chatris. The distinction amongst
them is primarily based on the form of the memorial, although they appear very
arbitrary, with only chatris being clearly delineated with the presence of a dome
surmounting a structure. Amongst these, the paliyas are most commonly occurring in
the region. The term paliya is etymologically derived from the Sanskrit root pal,
meaning a guardian or protector (Hornell 1942). They constitute a slab of stone (both
dressed and undressed), constituting two parts‐a sculpted relief and an engraved
record, although the presence of an inscription is not necessarily a norm. The sculpted
relief usually depicts an individual on foot or seated on horseback or camel or in a
bullock cart in the case of the memorial commemorating a male individual (Fig. 2). In
the case of a memorial commemorating a woman, the relief panel either carries the
representation of the woman or other symbolic traits that would be elaborated in the
next section. The variations in the sculpted depictions and other symbolic traits in the
Goswami et al. 2017: 1001‐1012
1003
paliyas commemorating either men or women have been argued to perhaps represent
the markers of differing communities or the socio‐economic status of the deceased
commemorated. The engraved records on the other hand register the name and family
of the deceased; nature and cause of death; and date of death.
Figure 1: Location of Madhutra, Patan District, Gujarat
Symbols and Motifs The paliyas in their form are in most cases divided into two sections; (a) the sculpted
relief and (b) an engraved inscription. The inscriptions mostly make mention of the
name of the deceased commemorated, mode or instance of death and the date of death.
The sculpted relief on the other hand carry depictions of the deceased whom the
memorial commemorates. In addition, the apex of the memorial carry depictions of the
sun and moon, which symbolises eternity. Such representations constitute a universal
feature of the memorials in the Indian subcontinent and symbolise ever lasting
memory of the deceased and his/her qualities and prowess (Thapar 1981). In the case of
the memorial commemorating a male individual, he is depicted either on foot or
horseback or camel or riding a bullock cart and armed with various weapons such as
bow and arrow, sword, spear/lance and a shield. The representations of these weapons
besides emphasising the martial qualities of the deceased have been argued to also
imbibe symbolic meanings. For instance, the spear shown with the hero is argued to
symbolise valour as it is the preferred weapon of the god Kartikeya, the general of the
ISSN 2347 – 5463 Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology 5: 2017
1004
army of the gods. His vehicle peacock has also been depicted in many of the
memorials. Peacock further symbolizes beauty and prosperity (Kalhoro 2010). Further,
it is observed that the memorials are mostly worshipped at the time of Dipavali, which
falls in the month of Karttika in the Hindu lunar calendar. During this festival, the
lamps are lit to honour the paliyas and appropriated for a good harvest (Thapar 1981).
The memorials set up to commemorate the heroic death of the wives of the fallen
heroes who immolated themselves on the death of their husbands are similar to the
memorials commemorating men in their form. In a few instances, both the individuals
are commemorated by a single memorial, although the woman commemorated by the
memorial receives greater attention owing to her achieving the status of a sati. The
paliyas commemorating the sati carry depictions of a woman with her right arm raised,
bent at the elbow with an open palm facing outwards. Alternatively, another form of
the same memorial carries depictions of the right arm emerging from a pole. This has
been interpreted as the wedding pole (Sontheimer 1982a). The forearm is depicted
adorned with bangles and a lemon or a citrus fruit being held. In a few instances the
depiction of the left hand could be seen. This could indicate a lower social standing of
the woman commemorated (c.f. Thapar 1981). As per tradition, a woman following the
death of her husband breaks her bangles as a sign of widowhood. The representation
of arms adorned with bangles symbolizes marital bliss and represents the perpetual
union of the deceased couple based on marriage in the land of the dead
(Chidanadamurti 1982; Sontheimer 1982b). The raised right arm of the sati is a record
of the practice of the sati having blessed the gathering before entering the funeral pyre
(Chidanandamurti 1982) and represents the purity of the sati (Thapar 1981). In a very
few instances a wedding veil adorning the sati is also represented, thereby further
stressing on the marital bliss and the perpetual union of the couple. In addition, the sati
memorials in a few instances also carry depictions of the peacock, which also
emphasises the valour of the wife of the deceased.
Paliyas at Madhutra The village of Madhutra (23˚ 45ʹ 14ʹʹ N, 71˚ 05ʹ 35ʹʹ E) is situated in Santalpur taluka,
Patan District, Gujarat (Figure 1). The village has a history of 400 hundred years as per
oral traditions. The inception of the settlement can be marked over a lake which was
the main source of water. The settlement currently houses a population of 4075 (Indian
National Census 2011). In modern times, the settlements can be seen stretched over to
the eastern side of the old village boundaries. The majority of the population follow
Hindu religion. Communities living in this village include the Sodhas, Ranas, Jagirs,
and other clans belonging to the Kshatriya and Brahmana Varna. The main source of
occupation and subsistence is agriculture. More than 60% of the population is indulged
in it are either land owners or the field workers. The rest of the population are
indulged in the vocations of pottery manufacture, iron smithery and carpentry.
The explorations undertaken at the settlement yielded 134 paliyas. These paliyas are
found in three clusters which lie within a distance of 10 to 75 meters from each other.
Goswami et al. 2017: 1001‐1012
1005
Cluster 1 (Figure 2) has 107, Cluster 2 has 22, and Cluster 3 has 5 paliyas around the
village common ground. Although there exists no documented record of the original
find spots of the memorials, the interviews undertaken with the local populace
revealed that these memorials were brought from elsewhere and placed in their current
location.
Figure 2: A Cluster (Cluster 1) of Paliyas at Madhutra
The paliyas are perceived by the contemporary local populace as a record of their
ancestors and are considered to be guardian deities that ward off evil spirits that cause
famine in the region. To harm or deteriorate the paliyas is considered a sin. On every
year, on the next day of Dipavali, which is the Gujarati New Year, the memorials are
worshipped with the offering of milk and vermilion powder (sindoor). The women of
the village conduct this pooja in the presence of a male priest.
Oral traditions of the settlement record that the existence of the paliyas is related to a
saint who goes by many names, in this case Maha Baba. It is the perception of the local
populace that the foremost of these memorials were erected when the men were rallied
by the Baba to protect the village from dacoits and died fighting them. The legend also
mentions the setting up of the memorials for those who could not handle the wrath of
the Baba for failing in their assigned task and were burned by the flames of his anger.
However, none of the memorials record the aforesaid episode in the sculpted panels or
engraved epigraphs. Further, the paliyas found in Madhutra belong to varying periods
ranging from c. 17th to 19th Centuries CE as evidenced from the epigraphs and thus do
not corroborate with the oral traditions. The epigraphs are mostly brief and
fragmentary and record brief mention of the hero, the family he/she belonged to and
the year of death expressed in saka calendar. There are a very few memorials which
record the genealogy of the deceased and his/her qualities and martial prowess.
Typological Classification of Paliyas at Madhutra
Hero Memorials
A hero memorial is a commemoration of the deceased individual who met with a
heroic death while protecting the interests of his settlement or his overlord. It serves as
a bastion of worship and a remembrance of one’s valour. A total of 78 (58.2% of the
ISSN 2347 – 5463 Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology 5: 2017
1006
total memorials at the settlement) hero memorials were identified at Madhutra.
Amongst the hero memorials at Madhutra, the following sub‐types were identified.
Figure 3: Paliya Carrying Depictions of a Horse Rider
Goswami et al. 2017: 1001‐1012
1007
Hero memorials with horse riders: A warrior with a sword and shield or a spear,
riding on horseback is the most frequently occurring depiction on the hero memorials
(Figure 3). On the basis of their depictions, these memorials are believed to
commemorate individuals of the Rajput clans (Kalhoro 2010). At the apex of the
memorial, the depiction of the sun and moon signifying eternity is prominently
represented. In a few memorials of the said variety, the depiction of a peacock,
representing the valour of Kartikeya are also visible (Figure 4). The memorials of the
said variety at Madhutra are 48 in number.
Figure 4: Depiction of Sun and Moon Interjected by a Peacock on a Paliya
Hero memorials with two horse riders: The memorials of the said sub‐type are similar
to the former, with the exception of an additional horse rider. The affinities of this
memorial type are also attributed to the Rajput communities based on their sculptural
representations. The depictions of multiple horse riders represent individuals related
by kinship ties who perhaps died together (Kalhoro 2010) (Figure 5). The memorials of
the said sub‐type at Madhutra are 19 in number.
Hero memorial of a horse rider with an attendant figure: The memorials are similar to
the former sub‐types in their form with the addition of one or more attendant figure
standing either at the rear or front of the horse. The presence of the attendant figure
perhaps signifies a higher social bearing of the individual commemorated (Figure 6).
The memorials of this sub‐type at Madhutra are 4 in number.
Hero memorials with camel riders: A few hero memorials are found to carry
depictions of camel riders (Figure 7). These paliyas are believed to commemorate
individuals of the Rabari community. Their associations with the Rabaris are drawn
based on their links with camel breeding. Further, camels are also associated as the
vehicle of Goddess Mammai whom the Rabaris worship (Kalhoro 2010). The memorials
of this sub‐type at Madhutra are 7 in number.
Sati Memorials
A sati memorial is generally associated with the commemoration of a woman who died
performing either the sahagamana or anugamana rites upon hearing the death or
impending death of one’s husband or beloved, thereby achieving the status of a sati.
ISSN 2347 – 5463 Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology 5: 2017
1008
The practice involves not merely the immolation of a woman, but is also associated
with the proof of ‘purity’ and ‘loyalty’ of the woman to her beloved, thereby achieving
the status of a sati. Through her acts, she achieves the status of a Goddess and is thus
worshiped by the people for prosperity in marital life. This tradition is recorded by
several tangible manifestations at Madhutra, which number 56 (41.79% of the total
memorials at the settlement documented) in the settlement. Amongst the sati
memorials documented at Madhutra, the following sub‐types were identified.
Figure 5: Paliya Depicting Two
Horse Riders
Figure 6: Paliya Carrying Depictions of a Horse
Rider Accompanied by Attendants on Foot
Sati memorials depicting a sati and her husband: A few memorials at Madhutra carry
representations of the sati and her deceased husband. Most memorials of this sub‐type
represent the male and the female figure standing beside each other, with a few
memorials also carrying depictions of the woman sitting with her deceased husband’s
head resting on her lap or standing carrying her deceased husband. In a few cases the
sati is also depicted being accompanied by an attendant, perhaps symbolising her
higher social standing in society (Figure 8). While the nature of the sculpted depictions
and the mode of death in the memorial depicting the sati alone cannot be identified
with certainty, it may be speculated that the sati depicted carrying the deceased
husband represents the performance of the sahagamana rite. In addition, the
representation of the attributes of the sati such as the raised right arm decked with
Goswami et al. 2017: 1001‐1012
1009
bangles, a lemon or a citrus fruit and a wedding veil are seen. The memorials of the
said sub‐type at Madhutra are 24 in number.
Figure 7: Paliya Depicting a
Camel Rider
Figure 8: A Woman Carrying her
Deceased Husband in a Sati Memorial
Figure 9: Sati Memorial Carrying
Representations of a Raised Arm
Figure 10: Representation of Raised Arms
Interjected by a Mathni in a Sati Memorial
ISSN 2347 – 5463 Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology 5: 2017
1010
Sati‐memorials with a raised arm: This sub‐type of the sati memorial merely carry
representations of one or more raised arms decked with bangles and holding a lemon
or a citrus fruit in her hand (Figure 9). These depictions represent the symbolic traits of
the sati. The commemoration of more than one woman in a single memorial perhaps
indicates their kinship or family ties. These memorials at Madhutra are 29 in number.
Sati memorials with a representation of a kumbha with or without a mathni‐ This
sub‐type of the sati memorial besides carrying either of the representations of the
former sub‐types carry depictions of a kumbha (pot) without or without a mathni
(churner) (Figure 10). These memorials are believed to be associated with both the
Rabaris and Ahirs, owing to the predominance of pastoralism in their everyday lives.
The restriction in associating only the former two communities with the memorials is
based on oral traditions in the settlement alone and is not a universal norm. The
memorials of this sub‐type at Madhutra are meagre with only 3 paliyas observed.
Discussion The paliyas in the region of Gujarat and Rajasthan, India and Sindh, Pakistan have been
subjected to limited investigations in the past. The restricted attention placed on
studying the tradition of setting up of memorials for the dead is primarily due to the
memorials being considered to be of limited significance. The paliyas in Madhutra,
Santalpur taluka, Patan District, Gujarat, were thus examined as a case study towards
establishing the significance of the memorials in the socio‐cultural lives of the local
populace in the region.
The surveys undertaken at Madhutra led to the documentation of 134 paliyas
distributed in three clusters. The huge number of paliyas documented within the
settlement revealed that the tradition involving the glorification and commemoration
of the deceased ancestors was strongly adhered. Preliminary reading of the engraved
inscriptions on the paliyas reveals that the memorial can be dated between c.17th and
19th centuries CE. Although there exists no tangible evidence to assign the different
typological varieties of the paliyas to specific communities, the associated oral
traditions identify certain memorials with particular community groups. Such
identifications are primarily based on the nature of sculptural depictions on them. The
adoption of oral traditions as a reliable evidence in the aforesaid context is governed by
subjectivity and later interpolation. Nevertheless, as oral traditions form a significant
element of ‘shared living experiences’ of the contemporary populace that associate
themselves with the memorial, it would be unwise to entirely negate the information
obtained from oral traditions.
The paliyas at Madhutra are found distributed in three clusters which lie in close
proximity to each other. There is no distinction made in the memorials belonging to
different communities housed in specific clusters. In addition, it was observed that the
memorials are not distinguished by members of different community groups and are
worshiped together by all inhabitants of the settlement. Further, it was observed that
Goswami et al. 2017: 1001‐1012
1011
the members belonging to different settlements do not appropriate paliyas found
outside their settlement, thereby ensuring the exclusivity of the worship of the
memorials to the inhabitants of the settlements. In addition, it was observed that the
conflicts between two social groups are traditionally resolved in the vicinity of the
paliyas, where the disputants are bound by the sacredness of the ground housing the
paliyas. It is held that the violations of the sacredness of the ground by the disputants
would lead to subsequent ruin of their families. Under such circumstances the
memorials act as centres of social gravity by resolving conflicts between different social
groups and regulate kinship ties.
The current study as a case study was successful in identifying the typological varieties
in the paliyas at Madhutra and highlighted some of the associated cultural practices. It
is however imperative that future researches on the tradition in the region be expanded
laterally to understand the significance of the popular substratum tradition which
involved the commemoration of the deceased ancestors. Further, it is also necessary to
examine the tradition of setting up of the memorials in the region in relation with the
socio‐cultural background which would perhaps throw light on the factors that led to
the popularity of the tradition.
The practice of erecting paliyas for the dead is no longer a living tradition here as
several of the modes and instances leading to the heroic death commemorated by the
memorials are currently banned by legislation. Nevertheless, these memorials serve as
tangibles reflection of certain modes of death which were glorified by past societies.
Although, these practices are currently outlawed, the contemporary local populace
uphold and exalt the ideal embraced by the memorials.
References Brubaker, R. 2000. Aspects of Mortuary Variability in the South Indian Iron
Age. Bulletin of the Deccan College Research Institute 60/61: 253‐302.
Chidananadamurti, M. 1982. ‘Two Masti Temples in Karnataka’, in Memorial stones, a
Study of their Origin, Significance and Variety, eds. S. Settar and Gunther D.
Sontheimer. Institute of Indian Art History, Karnatak University and South
Asia Institute, University of Heidelberg University, Dharwad and
Heidelberg, pp. 117‐131.
Hornell, J. 1942. Hero Memorial‐stones of Kathaiwar. Antiquity 16 (64): 289‐300.
Indian National Census 2011. 15th National Census Survey, Census Organization of India.
Kalhoro, Z. A., 2010. Vanishing Visual Heritage: Sati and Hero‐stones in Nagarparkar,
Sindh. Journal of Indian Society of Oriental Art 27: 232‐238.
Kapp, D. 1985. The Kurumbasʹ Relationship to the ʺMegalithic Cult of the Nilgiri Hills
(South India). Anthropos 80 (4/6): 493‐534.
Rao, K. N., Priya Thakur and Yogesh Mallinathpur. 2011. The Astronomical
Significance of ‘Nilurallu’, The Megalithic Stone Alignment at Murardoddi
in Andhra Pradesh, India , Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage 14 (3):
211‐220.
ISSN 2347 – 5463 Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology 5: 2017
1012
Sontheimer, G.D. 1982a. ‘On the Memorials of the Dead in the Tribal Area of Central
India’, in Memorial stones, a Study of their Origin, Significance and Variety, eds.
S. Settar and Gunther D. Sontheimer. Institute of Indian Art History,
Karnatak University and South Asia Institute, University of Heidelberg
University, Dharwad and Heidelberg, pp. 87‐99.
Sontheimer, G.D. 1982b. ‘Hero and Sati‐stones of Maharashtra’, in Memorial stones, a
Study of their Origin, Significance and Variety, eds. S. Settar and Gunther D.
Sontheimer. Institute of Indian Art History, Karnatak University and South
Asia Institute, University of Heidelberg University, Dharwad and
Heidelberg, pp.261‐281.
Thapar, R. 1981. ‘Death and the Hero’, in Mortality and Immortality: The Anhropology and
Archaeology of Death, eds. S.C. Humphreys and Helen King. Academic
Press, London, pp. 293‐316.