PAIN SCORES, ANALGESIC REQUIREMENTS AND FOOD INTAKE …€¦ · (Atlas of normal radiographic...
Transcript of PAIN SCORES, ANALGESIC REQUIREMENTS AND FOOD INTAKE …€¦ · (Atlas of normal radiographic...
PAIN SCORES, ANALGESIC REQUIREMENTS AND FOOD INTAKE IN CATS WITH ORAL DISEASE UNDERGOING DENTAL TREATMENT
WATANABE R, DOODNAUGHT G, PROULX C, MONTEIRO B, BEAUCHAMP G, DUMAIS Y, STEAGALL PDépartement de sciences cliniques, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Canada
1. Rolim VM et al. J Feline Med Surg. 2017; 19: 403-409.
2. Southerden P. In Pract 2010; 32: 2–7.
3. Reid J et al. Vet Rec. 2017; 180: 449.
4. Chandler ML et al. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2014; 44: 645-66.
5. Wegner K et al. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2007; 34: 132-138.
6. Lascelles BD et al. J Vet Intern Med. 2004; 18: 190-195.
7. Thrill DE et al. The skull In: Atlas of normal radiographic anatomy & anatomic variants in the dog and cat
2nd ed. Missouri: ELSEVIER; 2016. P. 20-48.
8. American Veterinary Dental College. Nomenclature. https://www.avdc.org/Nomenclature/Nomen-
Intro.html. Cited 2 September 2018.
l Periodontal disease (PD) is common and produces pain with potential impact
on nutritional status and quality of life of cats.1,2
l This study aimed to evaluate pain scores, analgesic requirements and food
intake between cats with minimal or severe PD before and after treatment.
l The hypotheses were: 1) cats with severe PD would have higher pain scores
and analgesic requirements than those with minimal PD, 2) pain scores
would correlate with dental parameters and 3) cats with severe PD would
have less food intake than those with minimal PD.
l Demographic data, prevalence and frequency of rescue analgesia and results
of CMPS-F are shown in Tables 1 and 2, and Figure 3, respectively.
l CMPS-F scores were positively correlated with number of tooth extractions,
gingival index, and calculus index (r = 0.80, 0.70 and 0.48, respectively).8
l The severe disease group had lower wet food intake during 3 minutes at 2
and 6 hours post-operative (day 1), evening of day 3 and morning and
evening of days 4 and 5 when compared to the minimal group (p ≤ 0.0004,
respectively). Wet food intake was higher in the minimal group at 6 hours
post-operative and lower in the severe group on the morning of day 4 (p =
0.001 and 0.0003, respectively) when compared with baseline.
l Results of wet food intake during 3 minutes and 2 hours/day and dry food
intake during 3 minutes and 2 hours are shown in Figure 4.
l Long-term analgesia is required after treatment of severe oral disease in cats.
This conditions impacts food intake before and after treatment.
RESULTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
l Ethics committee: 17-Rech-1890
l Study design: Prospective, blinded clinical trial
l Animals: Twenty-four cats (11 males and 13 females) from local shelters were
divided into two groups (minimal or severe PD) based on a scoring system
(Figure 1).
l Treatment of oral disease: Cats were admitted on day 0. They underwent
general anesthesia (acepromazine, hydromorphone, propofol, isoflurane,
meloxicam and dental nerve blocks with bupivacaine) on day 1 for treatment
of oral disease. Cats were discharged on day 6; meloxicam was administered
up to day 4 (0.05 mg/kg PO at day 2-4).
l Pain assessment: Pain assessment was performed by an observed who was
blinded to disease severity using the Glasgow composite measure pain scale-
feline (CMPS-F)3 (Figure 2). Rescue analgesia was administered if scores ≥
5/20 using hydromorphone either at 0.05 mg/kg (IV) or 0.1 mg/kg (IM).
l Food intake evaluation: Cats were fed drya and wetb food according to Figure
2. Total amount (100%) of food/day was calculated based on the following
equation (kcal): 70� body weight (kg)0.75.4 Cats were offered 33.3% of their
daily total amount at each time point. Food intake (%) during 3 minutes and
2 hours were calculated for each time point and each day/cat. Any remaining
food was removed after 2 hours.
l Statistical analysis:
u CMPS-F scores were compared between baseline and each time point and
between groups at each time point using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test for
repeated measures.
u Correlations between CMPS-F scores on the morning of day 2 and dental
parameters were evaluated using Spearman’s correlation.
u Prevalence and frequency of rescue analgesia were compared using the exact
chi-square test.
u Food intake was compared using a linear mixed model with Benjamini-Hochberg
sequential adjustment procedure for multiple comparisons (p < 0.05).
u CMPS-F scores and food intake obtained within 2 hours of IV and within 6 hours
of IM injection after rescue analgesia were excluded from the statistical
analysis.5,6
MATERIALS & METHODS
INTRODUCTION
CONCLUSIONS
l This study was funded by Hill’s Pet Nutrition and a
Discovery Grant by the Natural Sciences and Engineering
Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2018-03831).
Variable Minimal disease (n = 12) Severe disease (n =12) p valueMedian (range) dental score 1 (0-4) 17 (8-28) < 0.0001
Mean (SD) Age (years) 3.6 (2) 8.5 (2.2) < 0.0001
Mean (SD) Body weight (Kg) 4.0 (0.6) 5.8 (1.9) 0.007
Median (range) Body condition score (1-9) 5 (5-6) 6 (4-6) 0.078
Table 1 – Demographic data for cats with minimal or severe oral disease undergoing treatment for oral disease
Figure 2 – Time points for pain assessment and food intake evaluation
(Atlas of normal radiographic anatomy & anatomic variants in the dog and cat)
Figure 1 – Dental scores based on number of dental extractions7
• If ≥ 7 incisive teeth
and/or first premolars
of the mandible were
extracted, they were
counted as 2 points,
otherwise if ≤ 6 teeth
were extracted, they
were counted as 1 point.
l Total score was
calculated.
l Cats were allocated to the minimal (Figure 1-a)
or severe (Figure 1-b)
oral disease group if dental scores were ≤ 7 or ≥ 8, respectively.
Day1Post-OP2.0h
Post-OP6.0h
Post-OP0.5h
Post-OP4.0h
Post-OP1.0h
Post-OP8.0h
Post-OP3.0hDentalprocedure
06:00 09:00 12:00 15:00 18:00 21:00
Day006:00 09:00 12:00 15:00 18:00 21:00
AdmissionDW
Day606:00 09:00 12:00 15:00 18:00 21:00
Discharge
Day2,3,4,5
06:00 09:00 12:00 15:00 18:00 21:00
Figure2-TimepointsforpainassessmentandfeedingevaluaGon
W W
W W W
D
W
CMPS-F DDryfooda WetfoodbCMPS-F+Feeding WaHill’sScienceDiet,AdultOpImalCare–Dry,
bHill’sPrescripIonDieta/d,
Hill’sPetNutriIonCanadaInc.,Mississauga,ON,Canada
GroupDay 1 (Postoperative)
Day 2 Day 3 Days4, 5, 6 Total p value
0.5h 1h 2h 3h 4h 6h 8hMinimal disease 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (0%)
< 0.0001Severe disease 0 2 1 2 5 2 2 5 2 0 21 (91.7%)
Table 2 – Number of cats receiving rescue analgesia at each time point during the study
26 Atlas of Normal Radiographic Anatomy and Anatomic Variants in the Dog and Cat
Upper jaw
Left upperpermanent
2
Left upperdeciduous
6
Left
Left lowerpermanent
3
Left lowerdeciduous
7
Lower jaw
Right lowerdeciduous
8
Right lowerpermanent
4
Right upperdeciduous
5
Right upperpermanent
1
Right
A
Right lower
Right upper
Incisors
Incisors
Canine
Canine
B
Premolars
Premolars
Molars
Molars
101102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
411
410
409
408
407
406405
404
403402
401
Left upper
Left lower
201202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
311
310
309
308
307
306305
304
303302
301
Left upper
Left lowerRight lower
Right upper
Incisors
Incisors
Canine
Canine
C
Premolars
Premolars
Molar
Molar
101102
103104
106
107
108
109
201202
203204
206
207
208
209
409
408
407
404
403402
401
309
308
307
304
303302
301
Figure 2-7. The modified Triadan system of dental identification. In A, each quadrant of the mouth is designated by a number; this is the first digit in identification. With respect to permanent teeth, the right maxilla is designated 1, the left maxilla 2, the left mandible 3, and the right mandible 4. When describing deciduous teeth, the right maxilla is designated 5, the left maxilla 6, the left mandible 7, and the right mandible 8. B, Sche matic model of a canine jaw with each permanent tooth identified. The numbering always begins on midline; the central incisor is designated 01, the canine 04, and the first molar 09. C, Schematic model of a feline jaw, showing tooth identification.
3
3
2
1
21
Figure 1-a
Figure 1-b
Baselin
e
0.5h
1h
2h
3h
4h
6h
8h
Morning
Noo
n
Even
ing
Morning
Noo
n
Even
ing
Morning
Noo
n
Even
ing
Morning
Noo
n
Even
ing
Morning
0
1
2
3
4
5
Timepoint
CMPS-F
MinimaldiseaseSeveredisease
*†*†
*†
*†
*†
*†
*† *†
*†
*†*†
** *
**
*
** *
Day 1 (Postoperative) Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6
Figure 3 and 4 - The bars and error bars represent least-squares means and standard errors, respectively.
* and † indicate a significant difference between groups and between baseline and each time point,
respectively (p < 0.05).
Figure 4 – Food intake (%) in cats with minimal and severe oral diseasebefore and after treatment
Figure 3 – CMPS-F scores in cats with minimal and severe oral diseasebefore and after treatment
Figure 4b – Dry food
Baseline Day60
20
40
60
80
100
Timepoint
Food
intake(%
)
*
*
*
*
Baseline Day1 Day2 Day3 Day4 Day50
20
40
60
80
100
Timepoint
Food
intake(%
)
Minimaldisease(3min)Severedisease(3min)Minimaldisease(2h)Severedisease(2h)
Figure 4a – Wet food
Baseline Day1 Day2 Day3 Day4 Day50
20
40
60
80
100
Timepoint
Food
intake(%
)
Minimaldisease(3min)Severedisease(3min)Minimaldisease(2h)Severedisease(2h)
****
**