'PA Power & Light Co Susquehanna Steam Electric …Teledyne Engineering services Final Report...

PENNSYLVANIA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY

SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION

UNIT 1

REVIEW OF AS-BUILT RECONCILIATION

ON A SAMPLE OF 400 PIPE SUPPORTS

AND ALL PHASE III (LARGE PIPE)

ANCHORS

82i2ih04i9 82i207PDR ADOCK 05000387P PDR

0

r,r

1

PENNSYLVANIA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY


UNIT 1

REVIEW OF AS-BUILT RECONCILIATION

ON A SAMPLE OF 400 PIPE SUPPORTS

AND ALL PHASE III (LARGE PIPE)

ANCHORS

PREPARED BY. ...- P~Cd&~'ale

Sattar Date

REVIEWED BY:Walte J. Rhoades

-3'o-d"ZDate

TABLE OF CONTENTS

~Pa e

LIST OF REFERENCES

INTRODUCTION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

PROGRAM PROCEDURE .

PERSONNEL AND THEIR QUALIFICATIONS

TRAINING OF PERSONNEL

AS-BUILT RECONCILIATION OF SUPPORTS REVIEWED

SUMMARY

CONCLUSIONS

10

12

13

16

AS-BUILT RECONCILIATION PROGRAMREVIEW OBJECTIVES AND PROCEDUREMANUAL

RECORDS AND QUALIFICATIONS OFMEMBERS OF GROUP 2

RECORDS OF TRAINING OF PERSONNEL

SAMPLE PACKAGES OF ABR REVIEW

LIST OF AS-BUILT RECONCILIATIONOF SUPPORTS REVIEWED

APPENDIX A

APPENDIX B

APPENDIX C

APPENDIX D

APPENDIX E

REFERENCES

1. Teledyne Engineering services Final Report TR-5599-3 "IndependentDesign Review — Susquehanna Steam Electric Station," dated August 23,1982.

2. PP&L report on the ABR review of the Twenty (20) supports entitled"Report on Sampling of piping support As-built ReconciliationJudgement Verification" dated October 7, 1982.

INTRODUCTION

Pennsylvania Power and I.ight Company (PPBL) selected a portion of the

Feedwater system to have independent design review performed on it as part of

NCR requirements. Teledyne Engineering Services (TES) was selected to

perform the independent design review. TES issued their final report on

August 23, 1982 (see Reference 1).

A finding of the TES Independent Design Review, Reference (1), addressed the

reconciliation process between as-built and as-designed pipe supports. It is

a requirement that the differences between the as-built and as-designed must

be reconciled (see IE Bulletin 79-14). The as-built reconciliation (ABR) of

the Feedwater System reviewed by TES indicated, that it was not as thorough

and as complete as it should have been. On few supports additional

calculations had to be performed to )ustify the acceptability of them. In

one case, the weld at the shield wall was found to be acceptable after

reducing the conservatism in the original analysis and performing a detailed

computer solution of the support. In some cases statements were made that

the differences (between as-built and as-designed) are considered

acceptable. There was no traceability as to what differences were judged to

be acceptable and whether, in fact, all of them were considered. As a

result, TES stated that although't was demonstrated that the supports for

the Feedwater System were acceptable for all imposed loadings, conclusions

with respect to the total plant support reconciliation process- could not be

reached.

INTRODUCTION Cont'd.

In a meeting with NRC and TES on September 9, 1982, PP&L committed to review

the as-built reconciliation of twenty (20) additional supports on systems

other than the feedwater. The supports were selected from the Core Spray,

Residual Heat Removal, Reactor Water Clean-up, and High Pressure Coolant

Injection systems. There were 3 anchors, 6 struts, 2 guides, 5 snubbers and

4 springs. This review was completed and a report was issued dated October

7, 1982 (see Reference 2). The review indicated that on one anchor support

the as-built welding was done on one side instead of all around on a

transverse I beam sitting on two horizontal I beams. This anchor required

extensive reanalysis in an attempt to 5ustify it acceptable. As a result

PP&L elected to fix the anchor by re-welding the beam on three (3) sides

(fourth side is inaccessible but calculations performed indicate that theI

anchor is qualified).

PP&L then decided to follow through 'with an increase in sample size. This

was decided upon in order to get a handle on the as-built reconciliation

program, adequacy, reliability and safety of the piping support on Unit 1 of

Susquehanna Steam Electric Station (SSES). After some discussion and thought

on the size of the sample, it was decided to review the ABR and perform

additional calculations and analyses where required to justify the

acceptability of the as-built conditions and perform rework where they are

required.

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The number of supports decided upon for the As-built Reconciliation (ABR)

review are about 400. The final exact number turned out to be four hundred

and one (401). The breakdown of the supports with respect to systems are as

follows:

RHR 198

RCIC 75

CS 56

HPCI 45

RWCU 19

RBCCW

CAC

Total 401

The breakdown of supports with respect to type are as follows:

Struts

Guides

Snubbers

Anchors

Springs

208

100

44

34

15

Total 401

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION Cont'd.

The percentage of the supports in this effort with respect to total

population in Unit 1 and common are as follows:

Su ort T e Po ulation ~Sem le

Struts

Guides

Snubbers

Springs

Anchors

921 27%

839 25%

899 27%

518 16%

163 5%

52%

25%

11%

4%

8%

Total 3340 100% 100%

Please note that the sample is more heavily skewed toward struts, guides, and

anchors. The reason is because these supports are relatively more

complicated and involved with respect to utilization of various structural

and pipe support members and also the utilization of welding to join them

together than other type of supports. In addition to being the more

complicated type of supports, they are also the more critical type of support

with respect to load carrying ability. These type of supports, therefore,

are more important as far as the ABR process and review of them isconcerned.'ES

was kept abreast of our scope of work, program, procedure and progress.

A TES observer (from Waltham, Massachusetts) was sent to Bechtel San

Francisco Home Office where PP8L .was conducting the ABR review. The TES

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION Cont'd.

Observer from Waltham, Mass. was then replaced with one from their Hayward,

California office. TES observation of the process and review of the

procedure did include spot checking of supports to determine if TES agreed

with the Categorization (see program procedure). Additionally copies of the

"As-built Reconciliation Program review objectives and Procedure Manual" (see

Appendix A) and ABR packages, with Category III (see program procedure)

items, requiring additional calculations were sent to TES for their review

and/or concurrence.

In a meeting with NRC, Teledyne, an'd Bechtel, PPAL committed to perform the

ABR review of all Phase III anchors. Phase III anchors are'.defined as those

in the Containment, Reactor Building, and Control Structure in Seismic

Category I systems and subject to hydrodynamic loads. Anchors which are part

of Containment (flued heads) and anchors at equipment such as pumps, vessels,

etc. are specifically excluded from this effort. The anchors considered for

review are, essentially, the intermediate anchors which use'"structural steel

and piping support components to provide restraint. An anchor is defined as

a pipe support which provides translational restraint and rotationalli'

restraint in at. least one direction. It was decided that the anchors inside

of the Containment shall have a higher priority to those outside of the

Containment.

The ABR review of the anchors was performed in the same fashion as the 401

scope. The supports which do not meet the original design requirements or

design intent (see Criteria for fix in the Procedure Manual in Appendix A)

shall be reworked or modified as necessary.

Please note that this whole effort of review of ABR on selected supports were

completely under control and management of PP&L.

PROGRAM PROCEDURE

The procedure by which the ABR review was accomplished "As-built

Reconciliation Program Review Objectives and Procedures Manual" is included

in Appendix A. There were essentially three (3) distinct groups of people

(by function) involved in the ABR review effort. The responsibility and

function of each group are described, in detail, in the Procedure Manual (see

Appendix A). A very brief summary of the activities and responsibilities of

each group are as follows:

Group 1 — Identified all items that are the same on both Engineering

Drawing and as-built drawing by crossing them out with yellow

pencil. Items not identical are circled in red. Items not

identified on either of the drawings are circled in green with

an asterisk mark.

Group 2 — Did the categorization of the differences between engineering

and as-built drawings in accordance with the following

definitions:

CATEGORY I: Are those differences which are considered

insignificant, such as slight variation in

dimensions.

CATEGORY II: Are those differences which may be of concern

but upon further investigation are considered

PROGRAM PROCEDURE Cont'd.

acceptable. The investigation, however, may be

by engineering judgement or by simply referring

to the as-designed calculation and noting what

the requirements or actual stresses are.

CATEGORY III: Are those differences which are of concern and

require further evaluation. The evaluation

would require an additional analysis or a more

detailed analysis of the original calculation.

If the categorizations were such that all differences were

acceptable, then the review of the particular support is

considered complete. If, however, there were Categorization

III(s) with the need for additional calculations, then itwould be the responsibility of the Group 3 to provide the

additional calculations. These calculations then must be

reviewed and concurred by a member of Group 2 and PP8L's Team

Leader before the support is considered acceptable. Even

where rework is considered necessary on a support, the

calculations and adequacy of the rework was reviewed and

concurred with in the same fashion by Group 2.

PROGRAM PROCEDURE Cont'd.

Group 3 — Was responsible to provide additional calculations as

necessary and type of rework as applicable. The calculations

were to be performed in accordance with original design

standards and procedures.

Two sample packages of ABR review showing Group 1 and Group 2 work are shown

in Appendix D.

It is important to note that the members of Group 2 had total freedom and

made decisions independently regarding categorization of differences and

concurrence with methodology and calculations.

PERSONNEL AND THEIR QUALIFICATIONS

The members of Group 1 are Bechtel's employee. This activity was essentially

performed in accordance with Procedure Manual (see Appendix A) by Bechtel at

the request of PP&L.

The members of Group 2 are PP&L's, Bechtel's and Quadrex's employees. There

were, at the height of the effort, 6 teams in Group 2. Each team, regardless

of its make-up, had a PP&L team leader to assign work and review theI

results. The members of Group 2 were well qualified for the task. The

minimum requirements for the qualification were BS degree in engineering

preferably with a PE license and minimum of three (3) years preferably five

(5) years of experience in piping support analysis. The names and

qualifications of the members of Group 2 are shown in Appendix B.

It is important to note that the Group 2 people had complete freedom and

independence to reach a decision on their own regarding the categorization of

the differences and adequacy of the supports where additional calculations

were provided for their review and concurrence.

The members of Group 3 are Bechtel's employees. The Group 3 activity was

technically and administratively under Bechtel's control and management. The

Group 3 people work normally on Susquehanna's project in the piping support

section. The calculations and analyses, however, provided by Group 3 in

response to Category III differences were reviewed and concurred with by

members of Group 2 as explained previously. The names and qualifications of

the personnel of Group 3 are shown in Appendix B.

10—

TRAINING OF PERSONNEL

The personnel of Group 1 were given training and a copy of the Procedure

Manual to everyone. The information given to them verbally and through the

Procedure Manual described in detail their task and what was expected of

them.

Likewise the personnel of Group 2 were given training and a copy of the

Procedure Manual to everyone. Also the information given to them verbally

and through the Procedure manual described in detail their task and what they

were to do.

The records of training of personnel are shown in Appendix C for both Group 1

and Group 2.

AS-BUILT RECONCILIATION OF SUPPORTS REVIEWED

The list of the 401 Supports and Phase III anchors (Inside and Outside of the

Containment) reviewed are shown in Appendix E.

-12-

SUMMARY

The review of the As-built reconciliation (ABR) of the 401 supports had a

total of 89 supports with Category III and 312 supports with Categories I and

II only.

We found the review of the ABR on 312 out of the 401 supports acceptable.

The balance of 89 had Category III differences which required Group 3

(Bechtel) to provide additional ABR calculations. As it turned out, 25 of

the 89 supports did not require additional calculations. That is, they

either required additional clarifications or the ABR calculations already

existed. (This should be attributed to the conservative nature of members of

Group 2. That is, if there was any question or doubt on the acceptability of

a judgement or concern about the ABR of a support, they tended to designate

it as Category III and require additional justification). Therefore 337 out

of the 401 supports were found acceptable and 64 had Category III of the type

that required additional ABR calculations.

The 64 supports has a further breakdown as follows:

o 41 supports required additional calculations which can be considered

as simple in nature.

— 13—

SUMMARY Cont'd.

o 8 supports required additional calculations which were provided by

computer printout, but the difference between the as-designed and

as-built were not that extensive.

o 15 supports required additional calculations which were considered as

complex analysis because there were substantial changes in the

as-built condition requiring extensive ABR analysis.

Total of two (2) supports out of the 401 required rework (see the Procedure

Manual in Appendix A for Criteria for fix). One is an anchor (DBB-121-H7)

which required additional welding. The other is a strut (GBB-109-H31) which

required additional bracing and stiffening the structural beam supporting it.

ANCHORS

There are a total of 163 phase III anchors on which we performed the ABR

review. There are 16 anchors inside and 147 anchors outside of the

Containment. It is important to note that a total of 34 of these anchors (3

inside and 31 outside of the containment) are part of the 401 scope. For

simplicity and clarity of the statistic presentation they are not recounted

as part of the anchors. Therefore, there are a total of 129 phase IIIanchors (new scope) on which we performed the ABR review.

— 14—

ANCHORS INSIDE OF CONTAINMENT

There are 13 anchors inside and 116 anchors outside of the containment as

part of the new scope. The review of ABR on 8 out of the 13 (inside of

containment) was found acceptable. The balance of 5 had Category IIIdifferences which required additional ABR calculations.

Three anchors required rework. These are DCB-102-H2, HBD-1053-H25, and

HBD-1054-H40. All three required additional welding. Please note that

DCB-102-H2 is the anchor which was identified to require rework previously as

part of the ABR review of the original 20 sample (See Reference 2).

We found the review of the ABR on 55 of the 116 (outside of containment)

acceptable. The balance of 61 had Category III differences which required

additional ABR calculations. Again, it turned out that 7 supports did not

require additional ABR calculations but merely clarification of existing ABR

calculations. Therefore, the net result is, that 62 out of 116 anchors were

acceptable. However, 54 anchors had Category III differences and required

additional calculations.

Seven anchors required rework. Three anchors (JRD-129-H1, JBD-119-H57, and

JBD-114-H50) required additional welding. Two anchors (HBB-ill-H2 and

DBC-102-Hl) required additional stiffeners as well as welding. One anchor

had undersize struts (pair of size 6 instead of size 7). The last one had a

base plate which was common for two (2) anchors. The base plate is cut in

half to justify the analysis (to act as separate anchors).

— 15—

CONCLUSIONS

We found that Bechtel's original as-built reconciliation program, procedure

and documentations were weak. It became clear that Bechtel did not perform

the as-built reconciliation nearly as complete and as thorough as it should

have been. We were pleased to see, however, that the number of supports

considered marginally exceeding design limits were not widespread or even

significant. Of the 401 sample supports on which we performed ABR review,

only one support required additional welding. This is not to say that the

support is inadequate. To establish adequacy or inadequacy of a support is

beyond our scope of work and mission. By adequacy we mean whether the

support served its intended purpose or failed to do so. We may point out

that the loads used and the methodology applied in designing and analyzing

pipe supports are often very conservative. Additionally there is the margin

between the allowable stresses and those at which failure would result. That

is why the failure of a pipe support is highly unlikely unless there is gross

negligence in design and/or construction of it. We reviewed the ABR to see

if the differences between the as-built and as-designed are addressed within

the limits of design criteria and codes. The one support which was

designated to require additional welding was done so because otherwise the

limits of design criteria and codes would have been exceeded. Please note

that the support in Question is an anchor and as stated previously all Phase

III anchors were reviewed for their ABR. The other support required rework

because it was not designed properly.

-16-

CONCLUSION Cont'd.

C

\

We think the ABR review of all phase III anchors was a worthwhile effort. We

think so because of the weakness in the original ABR and more importantly

because of the importance of anchors. In effect the as-built reconciliation

is re-performed because all differences are documented and reconciled through

existing calculations and/or new ones performed where required. We are also

pleased that those anchors which required rework in order to maintain the

original design safety margin and conservatism are identified.

— 17—

APPENDIX A

AS-BUILT RECONCILIATION PROGRAM

REVIEW OBJECTIVES AND PROCEDURE

MANUAL

Revision 0 10/9/82

Revision 1 10/9/82 8 0"

Revision 2 10/12/82

Revision 3 10/14/82~ pg

Revision 4 11/19/82~a

AS-BUILT RECONCILIATION PROGRAM REVIEW

OBJECTIVES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL


PENNSYLVANIA KMER & LIGHT COMPANY

R.

WP23/1-1

W.. Rhoades — P. P. & L.

TABLE OF CCNZENT

PAGE NO.

INTRODUCTION

DEFINITIONS

ORGANIZATION

DOCUMENTATION RETRIEVAL

GROUP 1

GROtJP 2

GROUP 3

FINAL DOCUMENTATION 10

LIST OF ATI'ACHMENZS

ADDENDA 1

ANCHORS 17

ADDENDA 2

CRITERIA FOR FIX 18

WP23/1-la

INTRODUCTION

It has been concluded by PP&L that additional review of the As-Built

Reconciliation Prcgram is necessary. The purpose of this review is

to provide a very high confidence level to PP&L and the NRC that

there exist no unsafe piping supports in the Susquehanna Steam

Electric Station.

Accordingly, PP&L has selected a sample size of five hundred (500)

seismic category one supports to be reviewed. This sample size

provides us with the high degree of confidence we require. However;

after we have reviewed several hundred supports, this sample size

may be adjusted upwards or downwards depending on the results of

the survey at that time.

Selection of the supports to be reviewed will be made by PP&L

representatives. It is intended that the sample selected be random

with respect to systems but skewed in favor of anchors, rigid and

operationally active snubbers with less consideration towards dead

weight type supports. A complete list of those supports selected

will be documented in the final report.

m 23/1-2

DEFINITIONS

The following are the definitions of the categories of differences

between the as-built and engineering drawirgs.

CATEGORY I: Are those differences which are considered insignifi-

cant, such as slight variation in dimensions.

CATEGORY II: Are those differences which may be of concern but upon

further investigation are considered acceptable. The

investigation, however, may be by engineering judgement

or by simply referring to the as-designed calculation

and noting what the requi ements or actual stresses

are.

CATEGORY III: Are those differences which are of concern and require

further evaluation. 'Ihe evaluation would require an

additional analysis or a more detailed analysis of the

o iginal calculation.

REJECT: Reject is defined by PP&L as any support that, in the

judgement of PP&L, requires a field hardware modification.

WP23/1-3

ORGANIZATION

This program is organized into three primary task groups plus a

documentation retrieval group. Task group one will perform the

function of ccmparing and clearly identifying .all differences between

the final "as-built" and the engineering analyzed support drawing.

Group two will perform the judgements and determine to which category

each item, highlighted by Group one, is to be put and docunent that

category. Group three will take those Category IIIwhich require

resolution and perform the necessary calculations or additional

research work to verify acceptability of the support. If field

walkdown for review of specific support is required it will be made

and documented by the PP&L Resident Engineering.

DOCUMENTATION RETRIEVAL

STEPS

1. Check Pipe Support list against DOCRET to note the latest

Ergineering revision. (DOCRET is the log of engineering revi-

sions issued and is generated from microfilm cards and was in

existence at the time of as-built reconciliation.)

WP23/1-4

2. Copy of Engineering revision

a. Retrieve copy

b. Make 1 copy

c. To be filed in binder later

3. Copy of the latest as-built frcm the ABR (As-Built Reconciliation)

binder

a. Check revision xn bander reconczliatxon sheet

b. Locate as-built P.S. detail in the ABR. Check to ensure that

the sticker is signed-off by Engineerirg.

c. Put marker in the ABR binder

-d. Sign-out out card

e. Make 1 copy

f. File back where marker was

g. Sign-out ABR out-card.

Can rison of E ineerir and As-Built Pi Su rt Details

( Yellow-out Process):

l. 'btain copy of Engineering and as-built P.S. revision

2. Yellow-out all items that are identical on both Engineering and

as-built pipe support detail.

3. Items not identical to the Engineering revision should be circled

in red.

WP 23/1-5

4. Identify items that are not identified on either of the drawings

by a circle in green with an asterisk mark.

It is to be emphasized that no judgements are to be made by Group one

personnel and that all differences, no matter how trivial they may

appear, are to be marked in red or green. The following example is

an illustration of this regui ement:

E ineeri Drawi "As Built"

This item is to be marked in red on As-Built drawing

Bill of Materials

"As-Built"

4W13 x 6'-2" 4W13 x 6'-1"

This item is to be marked in red

5. Fill out the cover sheet ccmpletely

6. Package cover sheet, Engineering revision and yellowed-out

as-built P.S. detail.

7. All packages returned to group one task coordinator for PP&L

review.

WP 23/1-6

GROUP 2

Rev'iew and Dis sition of Differences Between E ineeri and As-Built

Drawirrs

l. Ensure that Group One Cover Sheet has been properly signed off

p.ior to performing any reviews.

2. Record each difference on the prescribed sheet (attached) .

3. Categorize each difference as Category I, II, III as described

in Definitions Section.

4. Resolutions:

Category I differences are those that are insignificant such as

slight va. iation in dimensions and thus, are acceptable by

def inition.

Category II differences are those that are acceptable by engineering

judgement or reference to original calculations. Por example,

the design called for a 6" diameter pipe having a wall thickness of 3/8".Jl

The as-built shows a 6" x 6" x 1/4" thick square structural tube

is used instead. This may be acceptable by engineering judgement

by comparing the area and se"tion modules of them in relation to the

imposed load. Another example is the design has called for a

3/8" fillet weld all around a member. The as-built shows 5/16"

fillet weld is used instead. By referring to the original calculation,

it is noted that a 1/4" fillet weld is required and thus is

acceptable.

WP 23/1-7

(Note: The original calculations are QA docvnents and, as such,

are considered valid and acceptable design basis calculations.

'Iherefore, there would be no need to re-review the original

calculations and would be beyond the scope of this task) .

Category IIIdifferences are those that require additional

calculations to resolve the difference between the as-designed

and as-built. You should search the As-Built Reconciliation

(ABR) book to see if there exist calculations that address eachh

Category IIIdifference. When there are no ABR calculations for

an item or the calculations are not satisfactory, you should

identify that additional calculations are required prior to

acceptance or sign off. Please print your name and your team

leader's name on the first sheet for identification purposes

prior to submitting them to your team leader. When additional

calculations are required, the necessary calculations will be

performed by Group III and provided to you. If additional cal-

culations are needed to resolve the difference(s), no matter how

simple a calculation, you are requested not to make them yourself.

'Ihis is because of two (2) reasons. First, the calculations

need to be verified in accordance with established procedures

and be documented. Second, the Group III fun"tion is to make

these calculations and they are available to do so. After yout

WP23/1-8

are provided with the calculations the package will be considered

ccmplete if you concur with the calculations and all Category

IIIdifferehces have been addressed. If not, a resolution for

them will be reguired. If there is an impass, PPSL shall determine

the final resolution for them. If rejects are identified (see

definition) because hardware changes are required they would be

identified and signed off. Needless to say, if there are

no Category IIIdifferences, the "As-Built Reconciliation Judgement

Verification" form shall be signed off based on acceptance of

Category I and II differences, if any.

5. Items that need Field verification or clarification due to

drawing ambiguity, clarity should be identified and brought

to %barn leader's attention for resolution.

6. Forward package to PP&L representative for review and concurrence.

P'ROUP

3

Performance of Additional Calculations to Justif Ade ac of the

Differences Desi nated as Cat o III b'rou II

1. Generate calculations per PEEN as necessary to validate the

differences and the as-built condition to the extent feasible.

All packages forwarded to Group 3 require individualized disposition

WP 23/1-9

to assure support adeguacy. The disposition of all Category IIIitems shall be docunented on the As-Built Reconciliation Program

Review —Category III Response form. Once you receive a package

identify what must be done and proceed.

If a calculation needs to be run, proceed imnediately and, once

appropriate calculations are canplete, attach them to the ccmpleted

package, sign the cover sheet and forward them to PP&L. If field

checking of an item is required, notify PP&L and they will make

arrangements for PP&L Resident Engineering group to make necessary

checks. If any support cannot be resolved by additional calculations,

notify PP&L imnediately.

FINAL DOCUMENTATION:

l. A sample selection of the Final Docunentation Package will be

made by PP&L to assure the following:

a. As-Built Reconciliation Judgement Verification sheet ccmletely

filled in.

b. Gopies of yellow-out cover sheets filled in.

c. Copies of Engineering revision and as-built P.S. detail

(yellow-out copy)

NP23/1-10

Page ll

d. Calculations as applicable, and when generated by Group 3

for each pipe support.

e. Completed Response form for all Category IIIdispositions.

LIST OF ATTACHMENI'S:

1. Sample signoff sheet for Group 1, "As-built reconciliation

Program Review" (See page 12).

2. Sample sheet for Group 2, "As-Built Reconciliation Judgement

Verification" (See pages 13-15) .

3. Sample sheet for Group 3, "As-built Reconciliation Program

Review —Category III Response Form" (See sheet 16).

WP23/l-ll

ASWUILT RECONCILIATION PROGRAM REVIEW

HGRs NOo Page 12

COMPARISON OF ENGINEERING AND AS"BUILT PIPE SUPPORT DETAILYELLOW OUT PROCESS)

PERFORtKD BYlPRINT NAME S IGNATURE

ORGANIZATION

PERFORIKD'ES

SIGNATURE PP 6

REVIEWEP BYl(IF YES) PRINT NAME S IGNATURE

DATE ORGAN IZATION

AS BUILT RECONCILIATION JUDGMENT VERIFICATION

Page l3

SUPPORT TYPE

SUPPORT DHGe NO<

ISO DWGs NOe

ENG G DWG, REVi

AS BUILT REV,

SYSTEM

SHEET 1 OF

PERFORMED BYl SIGN

PRINT

REVIEWED BYl SIGN

PRINT

FCI

DIFFERENCES RESOLUTION

CATEGORY I DIFFERENCESARE DEPEND ACCEPTABLEBY DEFINITIONS

~ ~


SUPPORT DWGe NOe SHEET OF

DIFFERENCES

CATEGORY IIRESOLUTION

~ ~I

~ ~

CATEGORY III

I

tI y

i~

AS"BUILT RECONCILIATION JUDGMENT VERIFICATION

SUPPORT DHGe KOe

CATEGORY


~ ~

kL ~ '

v1

'"'p

A $ g lc~ 4,a.rV

Q i

f

r-~

'0-- ' ~

j ~ ISa" .4l'

1 fF

l

A

ANCHORS

In a meeting with NRC on October 22, 1982, PAL conmitted to re-

perform the as-built reconciliation (ABR} on all Phase III*large

pipe anchors. &is shall be accomplished in accordance with this

procedure.

Additionally it was agreed that the nunber of the selected sample

size shall remain as four hundred and one (401} which is the number of

supports on which status was available (prior to meeting with NRC}.

*Phase IIIanchors are those in the containment, &actor Bldg & ControlStructure in Seismic Cat. I systems and subject to hydrodynamic loads.

WP23/1-8

ADDENDA 2

CRITERIA FORANCHORS (AND SUPPORTS*) TO BEFIXED IN THE FIELD (UNIT gl)

An anchor (or support *) in Unit 1 will be fixed if:a. It has been classified as Category IIIby the

re-reconciliation teams, and

b. It requires the performance of some calculation(simple or complex) at this time in order todemonstrate that the hanger is adequate, and

c. Jhe difference between the as-built conditionand the engineering design has resulted insi nificant reduction in the design margin ofthe hanger as gudged y PAL team leader** forthe hanger re-reconciliation program.

* Suggorts other than anchors identified in Cat III in 401 sample.

** Dale Sattar

WP23/1-16

APPENDIX B

RECORDS AND QUALIFICATIONS OF

MEMBERS OF GROUP 2

TEAM LEADER'S NAME: RRTTHp~ HO S eR 0 R.

(PP&L')

TEAM MEMBERS

NAME (Print)

Y<c ko'olte

ORGANIZATION

QUA

Go+ha (=<

&c.A/e/

DEGREE

& YEAR OFGRADUATION

8.5- (4t19

Ss l~~<

Ns i~85C'E /g7D

Se.hh Sg

NAME OFUNIVERSITY

T~. Qoiv. a Scr4k1

Qg ~ u C A5]Q ol-'vz~AXbi

QAuCdti o JjNAk ua lag- Tech,Oker

PFPT> gM)g ging

YRS. OFEXPERIENCE PEIN PIPING & LICENSEPIPE SUPPORT STATE

~ QC(V(

SI(ÃATURE

WP23/5(

:0TEAM 4

R S NAME.. ~AR~ R'. HJAr47VES T(PP&L's)

TEAM MEMBERS

NAME (Print)DEGREE

ORGANIZATION & YEAR OFGRADUATION

NAME OFUNIVERSITY

YRSo OFEXPERIENCE PEIN PIPING & LICENSEPIPE SUPPORT STATE

SIGNATURE

G i~szRT Artcc. '+PAL 7p c~Unlidd'+rr,'o~4cw'i~a~/ <

gozis Zw@'r~gyrg Zwvrw

/AS ~rahu< K

gPAZA'FX 4$ +F Xr

6rrrvERsl p pF ZFwur" gp /0

VicT~~ &as~z~+W~~ /AC/ITAL 9G: rrrCF. 4&/+6'~rrVuF V/EV

M~l&lW~~rc< P)cc.e g M-f lv CC6

(r(c))~ (oTp~) QC>ye<

WP23/5

mw sgmw mmR's mwE: ~oh» d, Sck~«c.L|'r

(PP&L')

a -rf-8'<TEAM MEMBERS

NAME (Print) ORGANIZATIONDEGREE

& YEAR OFGRADUATION

NAME OFUNIVERSITY

YRS. OFEXPERIENCEIN PIPING &

PIPE SUPPORT

PELICENSE

STATESIGNATURE

73/r~~'r/O r/

d)IA7OS II

chen A

P. KUVOIJ

A7'~ <

C//IAo-A( p//AAJQ

D u.- R

AO~1-DPv'x

8uMrexQUHDMYg CccI rr-=

r'f'C//7W

C

QFCff}EC

wer868'S

g-g. r-rory/ts9

RC.E Iai

I~aC Ht uraI~:.r5tC~I2AvJC~l ) IMBJA/Awe: WPlP4 /dV~A) ~7~ DN/l/.gR.Z~OrrS'i c~Z Ui'/uJD(A

i(gdiv'c'Rs> cf ofQ IQ crQpQMI

Oa}>vERsi~~ oFSour ERA CAGE c~P r

C

bv DB)D

Q/264'R

pic'Q..c '"'g ~

WP23/5

(.

TEAM a

TEIM IZAD6R'S NINE: QFUCC W +~+ 'I/O. I(PP&L')

/y -//-2TEAN MEMBERS

NAME (Print) ORGANIZATIONDEGREE

& YEAR OFGRADUATION

NAME OFUNIVERSITY


PIPE SUPPORT

PELICENSE

STATESIGNATURE

SAR.E.% W. a p

7h'o+8~ k, c+7A0 US SCILv+lYD/

Qgn 4c

PE, ZN.SpE zing

7/E 2lgw

W<srrzucru A)

8s pclviL) lgdo

vxAR, T VIVWh40

UI4 O~ 4 ~

coar&EZ ~llrcI/n&onfe'sing.

g/g IR,

9+c+A~ g./ @45+~ dsc/A

2bSCefCrt@, 1 fc I - ///IQ/gir&c'a/.

WP23/5,

(

0TEAM» QTEAM LEADER'S NAME: QILg<El Q goSE,

(PP&L')

TEAM MEMBERS

NAME (Print)DEGREF.

ORGANIZATION & YEAR OFGRADUATION

NAME OFUNIVERSITY


SIGNATURE

HI~4el Il Rose

I/IIIH IS. lJCgU BtJ

APUS t'd/Y&, d6NK iA ug~A

K84C Low I-lA

p pgL Ns. ling)

@V~ke g wS

40APRHXPv! 4 /97%M8 17

QUADR'S i)80

'U A iu6 ~ t 0~ (PCAvl~SaE.C

(Ver~ F ~L. g~J~~< e o.

SAQ ~OSP ST@ C

7f ~LitClairCA-Ll

mes 2PTEAM LEADER'S NAME: /Park P. b~f'aakYW~

(PP&L's)

NAME (Print)

C(AJO ~Ma~c~A P 5ud

Ebns Levlk

gasa Levid

doe Vo|'en ce

ORGANIZATION

QOGc3l < x

gWr~g&abbrev

guerre.x

DEGREE

& YEAR OFGRADUATION

NAME OFUNIVERSITY

YRS. OFEXPERIENC E

IN PIPING &

PIPE SUPPORT

PELICENSE

STATESI(ÃATURE

Al07p: gc) p cpu'84/'r <r>~i'e</ D~ WD l~ p +@+4'~ g++ +~X/ot w 4c/Fc p

NP23/5

(.

TEAM I Q g. Tnw rzaoeR's mE:g»»» g yg»g»cc~h —Pg

(PP&L')

TEAM MBCBERS

NAME (Print)

WOSALU

C c.<4

Clghsbgu; KA-cd~(

ORGANIZATIONDEGREE

& YEAR OFGRADUATION

NAME OFUNIVERSITY


SIGNATURE

A4P/: ~Z Pu>gr+rP:)re,i OH HSPV4 gXDPZ< >EX PMdrO>3 SWi~~&

WP23/5

(PP&L')

/%

NAME (Print)

ft'lQVYl45 Qo~g ~

gray h'ea~f4l <ToE, Huaca

ORGANIZATIONDEGREE

& YEAR OFGRADUATION

8773

$$(4s9>4

5 c.E.S9'? 6M5HE

NAME OFUNIVERSITY.

/san Xj7jP C~i'~.A@pj's'~(+~ fLC TC KN>t.

'Pm~ <~4«(oral

Sel@tAH fo&JQ lAd4.

YRSi OFEXPERIENCEIN PIPING &

PIPE SUPPORT

PELICENSE

STATE

~% Pg

SIGNATURE

,7.'P23IP

.(PP&L')

TEAM MEMBERS

NAME (Print)

(

A(Vs'RGANIZATIONDEGREE

& YEAR OFGRADUATION

NAME OFUNIVERSITY


PIPE SUPPORT

PELICENSE

STATESIGNATURE

54a

90+5-'d8 gPPg/w/c"Ay r4/ .pp" ggpyx ~rg~g~ ~~+ ~g~+~p~~ ~~y~~~

WP23/5

APPENDIX C

RECORDS OF TRAINING OF PERSONNEL

MEIVIORANDUM

SUBJECT + o

I 6 TC i'�(<) nd tet n Epl~(~ JOB ~O 5dS SBS

g ~gf (7 fCG~conCi/IA Pi~~ evHM

-2(

2

MEMORANDUM

TO LOCATION

FROM DATE

SUBJECT JOB NO

FILE

0043 (6 75)

MEMORANDUM

7 ihip '

n cert CF B A /UcB i 2 LOCATION

OATE

BUBJEcT lg,AgA/ AJ QWSIortc'8i'Sonne

i lwvolvo/ n 8 evieco

JOB NO

FILE

H . SCeeatC KVC .

Cgoing

7ec ~n

e-

214'-

BcA&coP4C/P+ C c P&@~&8rgg

j3AlA

/A FF CcCP ere L

20 -o s BeJPZC Ic'..

&ha- 7Pc

Z- CA'Svp.o

V043 (6 75)

&3 8Ec<5i +IJ k.

MEMORANDUM

o SeSSro rJLOCATION

FROM DATE ID

SUBJECT JOS NO

a<c

CQ 6 l9 c) R

g048X

5VLU IP 3 5HavJ

D 08 i'd'

Pe-1 l4

7' z.

re ea 7'/ Pe s I< isic y Se>pro u~4e

ge, P cC o Cr g6 CCCTkr rV'ro

7ems f4 ur 8< /ZVrsdd a~ DP'WXSO WC< ~n A'O+ 5 n

0043 (6 75)

MEMORANDUM

TO LOCATION

FROM DATE

SUBJECT JOB NO.

FILE

AR/ a.8'.

2 /A/

avl A?- ~cck4.ku45 4 I

g.bw oQ 0 8P.&I)+

~ ~

I I

0043 {6.75)

MEMORANDUM

o

Aricll~

d +/c7O W /CPoC ChIC'

Su</f Zo dm B'PICch,„ /o o

iSUMECT l 5/5 r0 4) /YOo / JOS NO. e5 4/S o Z~

FILE

ar . A c91 vcr

crsS8

QWCl. crcF1~

CrtAfP

I C. E7 C

c 86At K7 golfC3 Po Cc. elder'c g

c/ /cled

4c r~ r~eOd/ ~ 7rro era'"~ yy.P

cog Yg

cr oCeAuras rs ~u f c o/8' Pr A.

6 ~+~4 4e e cd'~

l4'>

lcm'043

(6 7S)

MEMORANDUM

I.OCATION

DATE

SUBJECT

FIM

EL Expo z.~~> sr~

/0 co z Yz'3e

0043 {6 75)

MEMORANDUM

FROM Oim O CO

SUBJECT

0043 (6 75)

MEMORANDUM

LOCATlON

BATE

o'r/- go

SUBJECT S V JOB NO «5O'S8 Z+5

Ses

I fv( NCa &5 UC d

3co P~6 Sac/C

C Vi

aced C C

~c'& /8i nfl ~

Pr (

0043 t6 75)

MEMORANDUM

L.OCATION

OATE P

SUBJECT

ALE

. 7

HA5nhQyv( T p+'TEL

P c

l Ald lei g~A A~DAU A A7 J'h.A I

-So s lEvi7-ak

p ogpu, g~

0043 (0 7S)

MEMORANDUM

BATE 19

SUBJECT

Ic/~R W+M4zFM~'I, l(a awe"d

Zo$4 ZE v'I 7

egg

AFerfTFL

8&erezQUA-7)Q e v Co R p

5 $4u/+~pg

0043 (6 75)/0 /I sx- /0:doe+,

g wH~~oM c SAr&~c8&MH~~

l<Qiz/g ~

'lPr~/~4')W'P. ~QA

N g~c /~We ~~~mrs.a+zo~

P ~C<'raw W

u

~lac'cnerZiw+za W + ~ ~~~ PPw~yH«J ~~c ~rD ~n'W'g

prmggu e~ > hAn~~l 8 ~~A- (@+ Zgw~c ~ ~p, P &~wc.~~a.W

~QPMu'~ Mw~ pr~ 7S ~~ t /co4 4r~~w~~lc n'a Mo m.

Wi I 8/W ~CCW~~ycg~+

f <wr e. C+8e~ ~ ca~g a/ M '9 -Qv'~HZ

~C%&Qr)yor wow ~ mW~~ N~v/H4 ~~~c7r Ke~ ~n'W)p

proc~~~~~~ W ~ 8 A, m~a. (g~p)rfp? el' ~~~@ rr E /iwcup>cry CAR &cpe<p op

peggy.c4~ 4 + 4i ~ p5'okra/e hi~ p-yr@~wge T ~/) ~~/~n'o'~a% ~e tt cr &~ac/Wr P. ~ ~W +/

QurAWi~<w,

4

k

l

/o

rl gow &aP~r QA~ ~ eC' Y~>

h

o< ~ra a@+ x ~~>~ib~~ ~rrec~ww~~+'>~/~>

op ~i < 8 + ~ewv+ Za/~~a ~n4

giyeua> ~ P

~ c veCeP ~+~, 6 ur>c ~sD

4g ~~/~ i~ rJJrir c~~~,'~4 Wi~+ri4uk ~n ~

Wd M ~%4 ~ / Wwo ~ l+~c

Mme~ ~ ~~m~ro~ g Z~oc~i~ry~aWpo -y~i -~z.

H

4 iffy/g~ (pPri&)5;>hapl H Rose

lllhlH 3 gQ 0'f&8

Q3ee fe

AVVAI Pdhlp, fVh

kh~ go~ Hhl~Q$gf)hi 5Qf7prlkfA

7~~~~Z~

~i~,e~g n(~g.+up~~

ppELguA4 CGg

gaul<dh/~WAX

S u+PRPA'dgepgg

r/~ p/oar

C . )ps 8~+'8 iZc~ c~lz~i 4 A

gc)od~~Wr~4 ~cud.

yaw ewduzaca<+ ~~w~a~ ~ op

p y y( Ppyf pp7urg g~jcpwapr &/ Pp ~+++/

~ ~~~~ ~p~ mls cp&m&7~WM .

i@A/ 5 g"AW<C 'Fgr~+Wr o+z~gr egg

cgv<g ~so/Dea4

~/~~~ . /egg ~fu aM'I

~ <u v$ ~ ~W cr cay + M ~ W 4~r C'P ~~a~/g~t~~y

p~~ @ra~ r~Wie4 ~y~~+Frg u~g ~r~ m/urc>('ye y) 6 r~

+j~r A m~P ~r, z'g>~uaw~P ~ co~Pe~/- ap M~~pe Awe ~ ~ $ + ~o<iP~ 2 ~ p~bt'e.~@<Hei/ ~~/~~ uPi~~ .

dpu~p~~~w X.

I

My"a<+ g — W~~r47u7fa- gg —y~

<r«~ Wu~z

gY(F4&'4

g

C5)~~ W~/Z4 MCu~

J

G'<S@'93Pg ag 4 &eA fZe C'caw~ 2 ochv rg~n pQ er-eM 4/> cpuA~awD . c w~/c immy W Ai~

~wgMrn~ ia ~~~w~igM Mad-M~ ~.k Mow/

~c W~r> (W ~~+~a rz)~ yr ppr gw pcncrw ++~@'~

W r'zltbr of WPr

.

p <yar~K W )<~i ~

~pP r4p

pZogr

~ D~A +~ ~~A gwcpg a ~/ yg H4 «>s 4~~lz/

Pecogdi))~)rog ~~~a-e~~, a~Pie»2 o+-aczr<~~<l

pP~g >du'laD Nay~~/ pZzy. 5) g ~ru4.k <p 4 yP z Pizmzw~P c-4

pp g gzz ~der a Jib g~ A'rouf>v g~pq<dP+~<) qg~)~~~W~o+ ~ ~Ww ~He& +W~PA P+ ~ ~~gp

op~ z~Moy a.I

APPENDIX D

SAMPLE PACKAGES OF ABR REVIEW

,Wo,IiEQ'D

. ARTNO. SIZE Oh~ .vN

T.U,I Erik TEL

SA O~IE:Eg

,:-P a,~~ W Cul<Z "'54DDCF FOX IE; " P/PE" f j'+P (g-p OL 10>jg'"..O'4'XS PIPF= S.j 4/V C4/OAI'.A 0; - C "C<

, I'-S6 SAIW~~E.

pi pI(

PEA, T. T RACE'4BILlT'lI,~EQ,I D

E,L—49I-- ----b 0 PIPE

I/q=-BOPEEP

HOLE,~iBY-Suan) -~—

c.m p3; i

Ir /j"/t ~l

n

I~~II(I

0

I

CoiJC. l NSERTg-C By CI.VII;&P)

~CTYPX

LOCATION PLAN

AREA..2.5'W

SIOe--C-c»sr:

gWS —.-X.->Q6 .~ICC.IE S Et ZO

E5'I='ll. CAlaC. a.T 'I

(C:ON C. =-.=-

~CE VISTSI FIE'LO H07'E,'d )pE~g~ g(S REg '0 Fdg /PCIj,,4

-~ELEVATIONA-A~

8'FV/SF'FR'S-dA'foal g t k'/SF ~ C'OA'0$ CP S Y7

(-4->'4'.O

lb Pfg FQP,gFP'$/F'P h E V I b I 0 N b DCZ-Ora A'll OFSD bY CH K Sg>VR NO'R

FC/= P %,9- -- 855-. 4

REF. pipE- -2S-6 5OWGS. R

STEEVC-

JOB NO, DRAWING NO. PlEV.

IDE I

orR Ess cALf . Rg, .z.',~„~ . pap'y.

urx ar. "»~

DiRECMN

/C),

NEIG~i7

-~i79 @

'<23

YiS~c

- 4'.g r~ ~ ii8D ~

; 78@ ~q t )796:,-77 "a" 4~72 '+

Q(-g

ERE'E~k'

/Z~~-F

~'-'3D4-

-" 288i"'

+ /b/7 -<

~/804 0+~87, v- 4594 Ie

+gg7 /st

, --NOTE S" I,'P'F)FF AJFF BIO -SIDF', .

--- 2-60r7PS,Z. C-OCA C 5 M'F $ 5-CA't.'C.

Bf'57EZSS 4A'OUP

~ 'i«» ~(~!/ItII.IAL O4 7F

. ~,~~,gm cr.<>«.~ZoI ~ P5'g „r gQ jl'> Iiig

Qc I VI I

&op )-fPP.,P -!hi -HI4g4H)

',

EaV PER'Ms-8'EPLT PH/$E 3Z ADRS~ OO VI ~ I ~ NO

PENNSYLVANIA NEER C LlGHT GNPANYALLKNTQNN, PKNNSYLVAN?A

NUSOVEHAHNA$ fKA% tg($ a/C STATION

l UPPORT - PEACTOR ElLDG

near, eo. PPB j2.f -jest<

gyp gr ~ so ~ ms-rrz- r'~-e~g

ff. ~/<1 Zw> 2 "5'C-I

5Tl%

PZ.C. l~..... UN IT:.~.l: 88Se DBB - l 2.f - H14 '4.sar > 2-

ITEM )IO I

NO. AEO'0 I

I

PART oo

0 ESCA IP TI ON

&- -X IQ1PE CS<-AN CALO@) Q -0~

I 2 LK— — I PIP-1=)t P)=, A;I,i

F $ ~

~. p =//+"3!c

'AT'I

5~1$ 4ee45

&IC

fbi'evision ! 2 has been reviewed against the lateit Eng-eertng approve revtston e I erences note wt

230 x

A)GAT '7-RP CK58ILI7f ..'IRtcg, P..

FCIE])BM S'-

g t f c}

"lg m%8P ~cn.aCBV SHOP)I C.mme~

V

, I)

(I

~ 8'V~ ~

I 4 ~

! ~

',I

I

N

QZI Q

,~m|'ATION

PLAN

ca-~ It)IP.t —.

i

{

I

I'~'l

~ r

c ~

Irr Vv

f/b + " O'ONc.

VIST5

Vo M AJ'T raEIct ILIIII

- )QI

his /97m e V)

~AREA "IS 5OL)T5I 0 8 ~ C ceZf'.

p~i~. Z~.W8-~i- .OOC SEC W .. gmcs~Z.

rCci 'IIC CAT GO!IT '1

~,ELEVATION A-A

~ HSHC(A LoCATIO1S Cs loOIT1 oRC

Aclocc Lccalts1 Jsto rs ~ rSAIIICAnottSHALL )I oS 1C:SO OII ASIIrtLI~ I~ rloC ISOLILICICI,

"HANGER -CRl=-I ICAL Rie NO.

5 524JLH3 O

IZED': A5 ~T'Cbrcpt/M

RR I55Uc-cFoRrcoooILL RIIc oIRN ~;- '".Q'jilj; Iv"rr 'vrov'I

II VIS)Os)5 IY CH'tc IS~fi~ FtRO+.Coot,n! ~t vr>IH;YL<„-HIS !IOIYER I, LIGHT CO!NAHY

ALLTIITOWII FTIIIOCrve'VAOIIA

C'.In~ ATSASI CLACTHIC sjAIIOII Hlotr S VIIIT a o ~AN to ILAroCSSCC),

JOB NO,

FC.L 94 f'SO

REF. PIPE )van- >~DWGS.

STEEL ~

DRAWING Ng. 1!l, I

'H'E$gs=. 7018

J

Ini).'I'I'ELD ATTACHI'lE')<7 HT ~.;.Ll&LaL...

'Feq'd

BIICI: I Cells

3/Fi I ~l )'r REI/. IO HAMI)c M~I=I /MILL'0

/- -8/ I C

II

.>~k di~ I V

)INAL kLYI

)E/CIC ACCT

-ILAIL

p rte r lt clSII I

LDI

oc ul T CVv: ur 'y 'er.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~... ~... Noae ~ Over I '/T" thrv 2I/T

Over >/, thrv II/T 70 f Over 2/I"150" F

.. 225'F

E)~/PI)'1ivere~ r.'Ai-~. <('.~,

p4TA r'T.VCC

)

BIAE5T~N1

q

„ayp,p' 7H~<!:v,gC

f"~~~ .P~ i+'~ f'l!gr~»

c~p7 (')

VV Cp ~ V(~C ~

httt~,)h 1>

C'7 3

r ('0gP l'~

gttt tg,))"r/~1

"y'r t,Pht )~

/C:6~5 „~ .". j"Cg~P

//f)() ~ Q /gr f)~f

g//gp/~V

'l A CC

~f- W>>~~gg l),'~)

)C,/ +/ f»i'-'f P~ ~

, er.Ei '- i.-rulc .'.a,tro sioux.z'o4px.

z.";,".r.vie SF~a ~, i'm5<'~ Eppes.s choo'p,.

l

iil;fT";:r f '"F

~) ) r~g ~g>t'.! AiL4'-)h. f 1 LJI'+Q„L

K <IVIt'mP)

"Pej, -lr„f -f~l4

v

iVLR< IO Pj-'A

L)[gL sY 'o ~~~ V h A~ h

we vi ~ i ~ eeREM PEERS-;AVER . PERSE Z .Z.&%5 C

PENNSYLVANIA PRER C LIGHT GNPAtIY11LKNYO'NN, PfMNSYLVAMlAI ~ma [)at~ ag~~a~t: aTATtaN

lPE SUPPORT - PEACE'LDG%AN FAIjg~

g% HO.

1fF.

C)

A A tf~e" -l"'A

8856 DBB.=l 2.l - HI4By App'd

Uh.

R".'..s.'V63~ ~ -~ ~ JO

C/gC.'+~1) ~ ) tk)~ PPCh

h

Ct'

(„'v<

',

) f

P

'I

0

SUSuuaHANMA svstNf s.lacYaC S'%Tl0k!

UhllT - 1

CATEGORY ZL RESPONSE FORM

ABR CALC. 8(-"'~~- <L

SUPPORT Mo. ~65 io9- A.c SMUBNCB Mo. i~c

ENQ.'DNQ.RI'-Y. AS.BUlLT RB,Y s/ Fz A,

pc~ ~

Y-''i'-; -8C ~ svsvaM.

AER CA|.C. RE%s10N RaauigaD:YBs NO

RBspQNSB:

,9,~55 wE /7E /AALVSIS'EA'Fu/PMZD g Fau~~d Acc& 7gg y,~',.

5'EE 8 7 T8C+EO d4ZCA'dl/7ld+$

RRRP0NSE BT.m~a.APPQDYED Sv

\w op. ls, 4%4 CASED ''A 'A . she

CALCULATlONSHEET

ORIGINATOR

PROJECT

SUBJECTGSS- f D9- fI<

DATE

CALC. NO.

CHECKED

JOB NO.

SHEET NO

REV. NO.

~p /o/ /gfdic

AE'CI Cap RqfD

le-CoU Cs'L Qs p,pe@ JIJ J)(g Qp~y

~ '

RC<uI.YOf'/

CIPs f I'ATIasJ ( ~~~$ ,

4lc~t, hs-'sea / ~ 43 ( g 2> geo I' II -) g &is7™,lf

L~t s;

-21sI 11 +wggg

2)gii x, 6~" -lf2gg~

x

/4 24 is

~

~'?I/, 3

2 I |Ill IIt'/ir.

(d:8<Kx2

csi

0 ATOR

PROJECT

SUBJECTAs@- /o

CALCULATIONSHEETCALC. NO. REV. NO.

/o /d. h O,) j).Z.DATE I CHECKED DATE

JOB NO.

SHEET NO.

i'tcw 5 l 0 2z g 2 g7'-ii')

~'89 in

CI

l4> qv< ~/r»~~RJ7 ( gi,pw

'c

'R$

P(c ~


SUPPORT TYPE

SUPPORT DWG HO ~<<> " /0 - h'5

ISO DWGs NO,

ENG G DWGs REVs

SHEET 1 OF

DATE /0" I8-

PERFORMED BYl SIGN

PRINTS'~ -w Arse

REVIEWED BYl SIGN MPRI NT lf~rkA'. 4'aa6MP

AS BUILT REVs

SYSTEM FCI — R&~ 5m~

CA Y I


CATEGORY I DIFFERENCESARE DEEMED ACCEPTABLE

- BY DEFINITIONs

3


SUPPORT DIGS NOS @~PE - IOg- H 5 SHEET 2 OF 2-

DIFFERENCES

CATEGORY IIJonrz

: i RESOI UTION

CATEGORY II I

Pr- c>

arr~ci~~~ 4'IPL54~LA'770/[f5 P/MAoL=.adwc.y ~H cvmD /'AJ B/'~~m/'.77As, f ~5gavE$ '47E&o<v M~

r T~~s z z @JAN

/v]z jy/D//C /d'2 (0

AS BUILT RECONCIL IATION PROGRAM REVIEW

COMPARISON OF ENGINEERING AND AS BUILT PIPE SUPPORT DETAILYELLOW"OUT PROCESS)

PERFOR>'ED BY,'OSS A. g/ Ah/G0PRINT NAME S IGNATURE

/0-)0 —82'ATE

PEcd f84 7'-z~QORGANIZATION

PERFORMED'YES

SIGNATURE PP L

REVIEWS) BY: ZASXla T. SEalanl(IF YES) PRINT NANE SIGNATURE

/o —gzDATE OR IZATION

ITEMHo.

3

--2I I S(VAY STRUT ASSY' .Dg PIPE~ I .SA 106 GRB'- W= 3 4 LOAC= 6 i'0 Wr,

(PIPE)'/

(T,PI '0 —A.193 GR 37ROD - L PL=SA-36'(OR SA.515GRG5)'BX 20 g'-(u" I G.

2'/S" W,2O" X. - I' -Ok-'%-SI5 gP,'-0 .«) e "I FIE<Zg

Q-SCAN'

. WI+ j.(os& ~

~;« ~L.uLIH- ),>

,'~x~vrr, / .2,g 2- - ,Y a7.

,X

EXI~>l'I«

'', N

h«(~3

~lu.i~t

rh

, I IdLA I'AQ

i'-.O~fiM|'.F<VV3

'= y'-IO%v",RE'I=3 "-

.'-'- PLb 4 "VIE'hthjr'OTER,„,LOCATIONI'tAN.AREA—..~-

~ .'ELEVATIONA.A

"=', syP

I. HANGER-'" == ". CRITICAL

3. SEISMIC CATEGORY4. RAOIATIONZONE ~a, SP EC IAL SHOP P R IMER

" ',REQD. PER SPEC. 8856.GAA. 5.2''~

r:CNis~ ~'ANT LhfBF3ICAt(T=i ~ D >EH SPEC

(3)

~f«ARK.NQ.-'-GBB -< 9 =H«~

-REVI~MP FEP='~" ~i'I.1'- - PHA~~'-- '~Pg 5KH r C.

SY ~ D%%) %JfV SI04 SThSh E > I s I o N s QCp:O~g',

PENNSYLVANIAPOWER 5 LIGHTCOMPANYALLENTOWN,PENNSYLVANIA

SUSQUEHAJ4NA STEhN E LECTR IC STATIONUNIT 1 4 UNIT 2

'rc".I= F~'9-'8C ~ 5'E'2(lqREI'.

"-<-I C 2

iPE SUPPOF t REACTOR BLDG. Q DRA'NING NO. REV

,jl rrr,

DJREC7,':!,ON AFl88T 7'AERMAI.'crNM~L/—~ ~'VPOf7 ~

'FMf%GENG-T

1

«

I

1 '4%I%740et> «'ax, eo-.-"GB9- f09- H6-

'gQ „'REV. PER 4S', BUILT, PHASE-'III'LiOADS . ~, WT SKH P g5tv aTtI

A t V «1 «0 N t SY CH'O«

«

PENNSYLVANIA POWER C LIGHT CONPANYAI.LENTONN, PENNSYLVANIA

VSOUEHANNA f$EAH KbK/jh/C SVAVlON

~-;~F.CI= P49-.863 5E'z.

REF.' M- 27-3-9 "

7~gg ''-C I55'''I" "'323 5

PiPE SUPPCIRT -R'EACTOR BLDG.t" Q'hAWING NO. hKV.

R- H- R. UNlT- I 8856 . „:GB'Et"-,.l09:-HS "pgp ""3" '

1

: ~ ',"..I "I* ..'s -,-., ",',"',."..,„',: . PgEEDINg."REQUIREhhENT$ ","~.'RL'

~

', jg pjEL.%61':,Mjp,,IIeq CI *::":'< Certified'Correcf?

''''W

vr~ ~ ~ f

l1 I ~ l

II%

" Zll" SWAY STRUT"ASSY C*.D. PIPE- I " 'A106 GRB'W ~ 9 ' LOAC'~"5 0' EIPIPE)

/PH76~REAR'BRKT..PI LI -'A-la3 GR'37ROD'~"'S -3 'PL'L1II PLr SA'36."(OR

S'A-'5'15GRGG)'WI8

IC M 0''-~ I')

/ a - M "' 8;v'

I31

I W'I+;g (o(P 5gfJJl llMl4)'S

)»I I Il!

I.

4f

AQ:*" '-OFILu'..CfC%'C) =

$'-Ia~ iul '418 ~ I (GI I

IA,... y-Z)4

Ia mI,S'

@ '214 '-L

Ch II

lopez

( ffiI =To'ff.I4-0 I

AREA'

NOTE

gagL

f7)I'Xlfloils 15 I orro A ~ ENSI ~ LLIIICO OOIOE LILIES OqLZ

JAL ~X IOII LISEO f01 vlRIflCAIIOR>I Of II 4"'I'IILI PANG R I ITI

d. SEISMIC CATEGORY'.,RAOIATIONZOt4& ~

5, SPECIAL SHOP PRI.,'IIERIll-

R EQD. P ER. SP.".C.'885o-G~AR :5

(QS

'LEVATION~fWALASRLIN,T DRAVrlNG 8 I . -i ~ aNQ fUS CHGS/REDUNEVV/Q ARRV Qf LD gfE fO/ISQI fINALREVIEW

EN~G Nls NEE HANGERI rt/QclLccEFKD

IE AtRV~ - ~ fE ARRV

~P: .~4. >~I. ATIGa I

Sii 4LtIT ' ICrSNT

RI ~ -I ~ ~ ~

RK IQ af 2

It I Y I e I 0 IO I, ~+Qtzf-OJQ vl

AMIAPONER 5 i.]QHT COOttPAP4Y

LLENTOITSe, PEFSt4SYLVANIA'.WA XTK~KLR~IICSTATlOPC

UNIT 1 4 VISIT 2

Ocr t',~ACTOR BLDG.

IiJWIT;'I"

, IY ~ Qggg ~ DOO CTROv

" ari. '/g4

~ \

HEATING REQUIREMENTS FOR WEiDING

Ph'...

70'F Over 2'/I" ..........'..... 225'F

I

+!=,: ~ I I "" ' f*'"I~ <'--.PQL IE7 lid~"-~-'.----'-r

~ 1 ~

h

'~ \I \ ~ SPh ~ I 1 ~

F'-zG

ZT<E44 CANC,NO .~@~ 4 R8v.

T'fPZ=-: CWG PYRE'Eg7'gAI A7

;- DIQECTlON- Y'MR~<A{.

-tl99

+oa~~c,/VP SEl

"'lOG fgMfRGENC 'f

+ 2067|

PAVL7gg

+ 2067t

IA4V PIIt4)

pEV. PEP p,g gUlgT PHASE GT LOADS.4V I 4 I 0 III

, maX ho, GBB-f09-H6MUTISM Pl 5bY 'CH'Q, KHO SWSt

PENNSYLYANIA PStER 4 LIGHT COMPANYALLKhlTOVN, PENHSYl.VAHIA

'SUSOLPCHAHKA )$ KAJ4 KtK)fRj| STATION

PClRT -REACTOR BLDt-.

.H. R. UNf7- l

L4N 4AAPC~

JOS HO.

8856

hEF,UNCS.

~ -.-FCl- P49-863I ezM- P7-9 "9C - l55- l 23-5

Q '44AVn44a 4 /g ~~~,~ aaV.

GBB-l03-HG'/p'h

II

h

/Q~P l~~ - P.ut~y. f<IJCgP'P tl 'A~&II >/'<! -lQ5PG'CT lO~ .A~ BOY >I I

~ /

V h

IT

\C~

0

APPENDIX E

LIST OF AS-BUILT RECONCILIATION

OF SUPPORTS REVIEWED

THE 401 SCOPE — CAT. I

1 HBB-118-Hl2 HBB-116-H2

AnchorStrut

1 HBB-125-H3HBB-125-H2HBB-128-HlHBB-127-H2HBB-127-H3HBB-126-H2

GuideSnubberGuideStrutStrutSnubber

'0121314

DBB-122-H27DBB-122-H17DCA-103-HllDBB-122-H23DBB-122-H25DCA-103-H9DBB-122-H16DBB-122-H18DBA-101-H4DCA-103-HlDCA-103-HjDCA-103-H8DCA-103-H2DCA-103-H4

RodAnchorGuideGuideGuideStrutStrutStrutSpringGuideGuideStrutSnubberSnubber

stem: HPCI1

234567

89

10ll12131415161718192021222324

DBB-120-HlHBB-109-H8DBB-114-HllDBB-120-H30HBB-107-H3DBB-114-H12DBB-114-H13DBB-114-H18DBB-114-H19DBB-114-H20DBB-114-H31DBB-120-H4DBB-120-H20DBB-120-H31EBB-102-H6EBB-102-H8EBB-102-H9EBB-102-H12EBB-102-H13EBB-102-H18EBB-102-H19EBB-102-H24EBB-102-H25HBB-108-H4

RodAnchorGuideGuideGuideStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrut

he 401 Sco e Cat. I 6 II Con't.

stem:252627282930313233343536

HPCI Con't.HBB-108-H15HBB-109-HlHBB-109-HllHBB-152-HlHBB-152-H2DBB-120-H18DBB-120-H22EBB-102-H21HBB-108-H13DBA-102-H5DBB-114-H28HBB-108-H6

StrutStrutStrutStrutStrutSnubberSnubberGuideGuideStrutStrutStrut

6

7

89

10111213141516171819202122-2324252627282930313233343536373839

DBB-121-H14HBB-102-H15HBB-120-H23DBB-109-H13DBB-121-H23DBB-121-H25EBB-103-H4HBB-101-H6HBB-102-H16DBB-109-H2DBB-109-H4DBB-109-H9DBB-109-HllDBB-109-H14DBB-112-H3DBB-121-HlDBB-121-H2DBB-121-H4DBB-121-H5DBB-121-H6DBB-121-H8DBB-121-H9DBB-121-HloDBB-121-H12DBB-121-H15DBB-121-H17DBB-121-H19DBB-121-H20DBB-121-H22DBB-121-H24EBB-103-H5HBB-101-HlHBB-101-H3HBB-102-Hl

1 HBB-113-HllHBB-113-H15HBB-113-H17DBB-109-H20DBB-112-H2

RodRodRodAnchorAnchorAnchorAnchorAnchorGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideStrutStrutStrutStrutStrut.StrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrut

e 401 Sco e — Cat. I & II Con't.

stem:404142434445464748495051

.525354555657585960616263

RCIC Con't.HBB-102-H3HBB-102-H4HBB-102-H17HBB-103-H2HBB-109-H12HBB-113-HlHBB-113-H2HBB-113-H6HBB-113-H7HBB-113-H9HBB»113-H10HBB-113-H12HBB-113-H13HBB-113-H14HBB-113-H19HBB-113-H20HBB-113-H21DBB-112-HlDBB-121-H13HBB-101-H4DBB-109-HjDBB-109-H24HBB-101-H14DBA-105-H15

StrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutSpringSpringSpringSnubber

Snubber

Snubber 5 StrutGuideSC-rut

101112131415161718192021222324

GBB-103-H3GBB-103-H4GBB-103-H5HBB-104-HlHBB-104-H14HBB-104-H32GBB-101-HlGBB-101-H3GBB-101-H7GBB-101-HllGBB-101-H16GBB-101-H18GBB-101-H21GBB-101-H31GBB-102-H7

25 GBB-103-H226 GBB-103-H6

HBB-104-H22.27

1, GBB-101-H42 GBB-101-H23

GBB-101-H36GBB-101-H9GBB-101-H26GBB-101-H28GBB-102-H4GBB-102-H12GBB-.102-H16

RodRodAnchorGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrut

401 Sco e — Cat. I 8 II Con't.

S stem: CS Con't.282930

'3132333435363738394041

HBB-104-H29HBB-104-H31HBB-104-H36HBB-104-H40GBB-101-H22GBB-102-H3GBB-102-HllGBB-101-H41HBB-104-HloHBB-104-HllHBB-104-H12DCA-107-H18DCA-109-H6GBB-102-Hlo

StrutStrutStrutStrutSpringSpringSpringSnubberSnubberSnubberSnubberStrutSnubberGuide

8 2 Struts8 2 Struts5 2 Struts

S stem: RHR1

2

34567

89

10ll12131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536

GBB-110-H22GBB-106-H7GBB-109-H8GBB-109-H21GBB-110-H28HBB-111-H19HBB-120-H24HBB-120-H25HBD-184-H2GBB-105-H4GBB-105-H8GBB-107-H9GBB-109-H28GBB-110-H18GBB-110-H33GBB-110-H36GBB-110-H37GBB-111-H3GBB-111-H7GBB-115-H7GBB-115-H8GBB-115-HllGBB-118-H3GBB-118-H4GBB-118-H5GBB-118-H9GBB-118-HloGBB-118-HllDBB-115-H5DBB-115-H7DBB-115-H14DBB-115-H15DBB-115-H18DBB-115-H19GBB-104-H2GBB-104-H5

RodAnchorAnchorAnchorAnchorAnchorAnchorAnchorAnchorGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrut

„ 401 Sco

S stem:

e — Cat. I & IICon't.'HR

Con't.3738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465666768697071727374757677787980818283848586878889

GBB-104-H20GBB-104-H23GBB-104-H33GBB-104-H38GBB-104-H45GBB-106-H2GBB-106-H14GBB-106-H22GBB-107-H3GBB-107-H4GBB-107-H5GBB-107-H16GBB-107-H20GBB-107-H24GBB-107-H27GBB-107-H30GBB-107-H32GBB-108-H2GBB-108-H4GBB-109-HloGBB-109-H12GBB-109-H19GBB-109-H20GBB-110-H3GBB-110-HllGBB-110-H14GBB-110-H16GBB-110-H41GBB-ill-H6GBB-112-H19GBB-114-H4GBB-115-H2GBB-115-H4GBB-115-H12GBB-118-H22HBB-110-H14HBB-110-H15HBB-110-H16HBB-110-H31HBB-110-H34HBB-110-H41HBB-110-H49HBB-111-H8HBB-ill-H14HBB-ill-H36HBB-113-H23HBB-120-H3HBB-120-H4HBB-120-H14GBB-104-HjGBB-104-H35GBB-106-H23GBB-114-H2

StrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutStrut

— StrutStrutStrutStrutSpringSpringSpringSpring

he 401 Sco e — Cat. I 8 II Con't.

S stem: RHR Con't.90919293949596979899

100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142

DBB-107-HllDBB-115-H8DBB-115-H9GBB-104-H8GBB-104-HloGBB-104-H18GBB-104-H21GBB-104-H40GBB-104-H42GBB-104-H47GBB-104-H52GBB-104-H54HBB-110-H3HBB-110-H12HBB-110-H21HBB-110-H35HBB-110-H36HBB-110-H37HBB-110-H38HBB-110-H39HBB-111-H30HBB-111-H31DCA-111-H3GBB-109-H26GBB-109-H27GBB-112-H17GBB-112-H18GBB-120-H2GBB-120-H4GBB-120-H6GBB-120-H7GBB-120-H8GBB-120-HloGBB-120-H11GBB-120-H12GBB-120-H15GBB-120-H16GBB-120-H18GBB-120-H19GBB-120-H20GBB-120-H21GBB-120-H22GBB-120-H23GBB-120-H24GBB-120-H25GBB-120-H26GBB-120-H33HBB-120-H19HBB-120-H20HBB-120-H21HBB-120-H22DCA-111-H31DCA-111-H34

SpringSnubberSnubberSnubberSnubberSnubberSnubberSnubberSnubberSnubberSnubberSnubberSnubberSnubberSnubberSnubberSnubberSnubberSnubberSnubberSnubberSnubberGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideGuideStrutStrut

he 401 Sco e — Cat. I 6 II Con't.

S stem: RHR Con't.143144145146147148149150

DCB-102-H3HBB-120-H15HBB-120-H16HBB-120-H18DCA-108-H1DCA-111-H2DCA-111-H37GBB-104-H49

StrutStrutStrutStrutSpringSpringSnubberSnubber

THE 401 SCOPE — CAT. I, II & III

1 DBB-114-H5HBB-109-H3DBB-114-H30DBB-117-H8DBB-114-H8DBA-102-H4EBB-102-H20HBB-109-HloDBB-120-H5

StrutStrutAnchorSnubberStrutStrutStrutAnchorAnchor

stem1

234567

89

101112

DBB-109-HlHBB-113-H8HBB-113-H16DBB-121-H7EBB-103-H2HBB-113-H18HBB-101-H8DBB-109-H3DBB-121-HllDBB-121-H16HBB-101-H9HBB-113-H24

GuideAnchorAnchorAnchorAnchorStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutAnchorGuide

1 DBB-122-H92 DBB-122-Hlo

DCA-102-H16DCA-102-HljDBB-122-H7

GuideGuideAnchorAnchorAnchor

stem: CS

1

23456789

101112131415

HBB-104-H37HBB-104-H19GBB-103-H8GBB-101-H34HBB-104-H38GBB-101-H6GBB-101-H15HBB-104-H2GBB-101-H30GBB-102-H2GBB-102-H15HBB-104-H25HBB-104-H17GBB-101-H32GBB-101-H35

"GuideSpringGuideStrutStrutRodGuideStrutStrutGuideStrutGuideStrutStrutAnchor

stem: RHRHBB-ill-H9GBB-106-H16GBB-120-H3GBB-107-H8

AnchorAnchorGuideStrut

S stem: RHR567

89

10111213141516

DCA-111-H30DCA-111-H27DCA-111-H35DBB-115-H20GBB-118-H8GBB-109-H13GBB-115-H10GBB-107-HllGBB-107-H34GBB-115-H13GBB-104-H27GBB-104-H28

GuideStrutStrutStrutGuideStrutGuideStrutStrutStrutStrutSnubber

S stem: RHR Con't.1

23456

7

89

1011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132

GBB-110-H9GBB-104-H9DBB-115-H6GBB-118-H20GBB-120-HlHBB-111-H17GBB-118-H16GBB-109-H6GBB-107-H25GBB-118-H15HBB-111-H20HBB-110-H6HBB-110-H23HBB-120-H13HBB-120-H17GBB-106-H13GBB-109-H18GBB-110-H12GBB-115-H6GBB-104-H31GBB-104-H36GBB-105-HlGBB-104-HlGBB-104-H4GBB-104-H24HBB-111-H32GBB-106-HllGBB-109-H31HBB-111-H29GBB-118-H17GBB-120-H14GBB-115-H9

AnchorStrutAnchorGuideGuideStrutGuideStrutStrutGuideStrutStrutStrutStrutStrutGuideStrutStrutStrutSnubberSnubberSnubber,SpringStrutSnubberSnubberStrutStrutSnubberGuideGuideAnchor

List of All Phase III Anchors (Inside and Outside of Containment)

S stem:EBD-113-H10 Category I, II & III

S stem:

S stem:*** 3* 4

S stem:

HBB-118-HlHBD-182-H35HBD-llll-HlHBD-1112-Hl

HBD-129-H24HBD-129-H25HBD-130-H17HBD-130-H18

HCD-101-H4HCB-101-Hl

CategoryCategoryCategoryCategory


CategoryCategory

I & III, II & IIIII, II & III

I & III & III & III& II

I & III, II & III

S stem: CIGJCD-115-H44 Cateogry I & II

S stem: CONDENSATEEBD-114-H26EBD-114-H33

CategoryCategory

S stem.

S stem:

GBB-101-H35GBB-101-H36HCD-111-H4HCD-115-H5


I, II & IIII & III, II & IIII, II & III

1

234567

89

10*11*12

ayg15161718

HBD-59-H22HBD-59-H23HBD-59-H24HBD-60-H4HDB-60-H10HBD-60-H13HBD-60-H16HBD-99-H18HBD-99-H19HBD-99-H20HBD-1053-H25HBD-1054-H40HBD-1055-H6HBD-1056-H40HBD-3001-H9HBD-3001-H12HBD-3001'-H14HBD-3003-H9

CategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategory

II, II & IIII & III, II & IIII, II & IIII$ II & IIII, II & IIII, II & IIII & III & III, II & IIII & IIII & II

Category I & IICategory I & IICatgory I, II & III

ist of All Phase III Anchors (Inside and Outside of Containment) Cont'd.

S stem: CW (Cont'd.)19202122232425

JBD-114-H44JBD-114-H50JBD-114-H51JBD-114-H52JBD-119-H32JBD-119-H56JBD-119-H57

CategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategory

I, IT. S IT.II, II & IIII, II & IIII, II S IIII & III, II & IIII, II S III

S stem: DIESEL AUXILIARIESHBC-5-H13HBC-8-H12HBC-11-H40HBC-13-H26

S stem:


?&III, II &

I & III, II S

IIIIII

'10ll12131415161718192021222324'5262728293031

35363738

HRC-3-H18HRC-3-H24HRC-3-H25HRC-3-H31HRC-3-H32HRC-3-H38HRC-3-H39HRC-3-H45HRC-5-H5HRC-9-H20HRC-9-H21HRC-9-H23HRC-9-H27HRC-9-H28HRC-9-H31HRC-9-H32HRC-9-H35HRC-10-H5HRC-13-H13HRC-14-H2HRC-14-H10HRC-16-H4HRC-101-H3HRC-101-H18HRC-101-H20HRC-102-H1HRC-102-H2HRC-102-H14HRC-103-H4HRC-104-H4HRC-105-H6HRC-105-HjHRC-105-H15HRC-106-H16HRC-106-H17HRC-106-H21HRC-107-H2HRC-108-H4

CategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryNoneCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategory

I&III & III & III & IIII S III, II S

II, II &

I S IIII&III, II &

I & IIII&III S II

IIIIII

III

I&III&II'I, II &

I & III, II S

I S III, II &

IIIIIIIII

I, II &

I, II &

I, II S

I, II &

I, II &

I, IT. S

I & II

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

I, II &

I & III

I & III, II S III

ist of All Phase III Anchors (Inside and Outside of Containment) Cont'd.

S stem ESW (Cont'd.)3940414243444546474849

S stem:1

2

S stem:

'stem:1

234567

S stem:

HRC-109-H4HRC-110-H4HRC-116-H3HRC-123-HlHRC-134-HlHRC-205-H28HRC-206-H12HRC-214-H4JRD-129-HllJRD-140-H5JRD-141-H7

HBC-114-HlHBD-1048-H8

DBD-101-H32DBD-101-H33DBD-101-H34DBD-113-H7DBD-122-H2

DBB-144-H30DBB-120-H5EBB-102-H17EBB-102-H22HBB-109-H8HBB-109-HloHCD-114-Hl

HBD-156-H42HBD-158-H5

CategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategory

CategoryCategory

CategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategory

CategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategory

CategoryCategory

I & IIII, II &

II, II &

I & III, II &

I, II &

I, II &

I, II &

I

I, II &

I$ II &

I & IZI, II &

II & III & II

I, II &

I, II &

I, II &

I, II &

I & III, II &

I, II &

I & III, II &

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

S stem: MAIN STEAMDBB-105-H12

S stem:GBB-131-Hl

S stem:

Category

Category

I, II &

I & II

<

6* 7

8

9

DBB-109-H20DBB-112-H2DBB-121-H7DBB-121-H14EBB-103-H2HBB-101-H9HBB-102-H7HBB-102-H15HBB-113-H8

CategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategory

I & III & III, II &

I & III, II &

I, II &

I, II &

I & III, II &

IIIIIIIIIIIIIII

All Ph III A chors (Inside and Outside of Containment) (Cont'd.)

S stem:1011

S stem:

RCIC (Cont'd.)HBB-113-H16HBB-120-H23

EBD-110-H21

Category I, II &

Category I & XI

Category X, II &

XII

S stem: RHR

1

A 234567

89

1011

*17*18

192021222324

S stem:

DBB-115-H6DCB-102-H2GBB-106-H7GBB-106-H16GBB-109-H8GBB-109-H21GBB-110-H9GBB-110-H28GBB«115-H9GBC-105-H4HBB-111-H2HBB-111-H9HBB-111-H19HBB-120-H24HBB-120-H25HBD-184-H2HBD-186-H2HBD-186-H4HCD-112-H23HRC-2-H12HRC-2-H13HRC-114-H5HRC-101-HlHRC-16-H2

CategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategoryCategory

I, II & IIIX, II & IIXI&IXI, II & IIII, II & IIII & III, IX & XIXI&II.I, IX & IXXI, XI & IIXI, IX & IIII, II & IXII & III & III& III & XII, IX & IIIX&III & IIX & III, IX & IIII, IX & IIXII, IX & III

S stem:

GBB-134-HlHBB-147-HlHBB-147-H5

Category I, II &

Category I & XICategory I, II &

IIIIIX

1

234

* 5*

DBB-122-H7DBB-122-H17DBC-101-H12DBC-102-H21DCA-102-H16DCA-102-H17

Category I,Category I,Category I,Category I,Category I,Category I,

II & IIIII & XIIII & IIIII & IIIII & IIIII & III

S stem:1

SPCUHBD-173-H10 Category I & II

f A 1 Ph III A hors (Inside and Outside of Containment) (Cont'd.)

S stem:JRD-107-H9JRD-128-H7JRD-129-Hl

Category ICategory I, II 8 IIICategory I, II 8 III

* Designates anchors inside of containment.

'PA Power & Light Co Susquehanna Steam Electric …Teledyne Engineering services Final Report...

Documents

Transcript of 'PA Power & Light Co Susquehanna Steam Electric …Teledyne Engineering services Final Report...