OxidativeStressinBipolarDisorder:aMeta 5analysisof ... · NDUFS7)in post5mortem hippocampus) of)...
Transcript of OxidativeStressinBipolarDisorder:aMeta 5analysisof ... · NDUFS7)in post5mortem hippocampus) of)...
Oxidative Stress in Bipolar Disorder: a Meta-‐analysis of Oxidative Stress Markers and an Investigation of the
Hippocampus
by
Nicole C. Brown
A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Science
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology University of Toronto
© Copyright by Nicole C. Brown (2014)
ii
Oxidative Stress in Bipolar Disorder: a Meta-‐analysis of Oxidative
Stress Markers and an Investigation of the Hippocampus
Nicole C. Brown
Master of Science
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology University of Toronto
2014
Abstract
Bipolar disorder is a prevalent and debilitating disease, however, its pathophysiology
remains unknown. There is substantial evidence of oxidative damage in bipolar disorder
from both peripheral and post-‐mortem samples, especially in the prefrontal cortex. It is the
objective of this study to consolidate research measuring oxidative stress biomarkers in
bipolar disorder through a meta-‐analysis and to determine if the hippocampus region is a
specific target of oxidative damage through a biochemical study using post-‐mortem
samples. Results from this study further confirm the presence of oxidative damage in
bipolar disorder, but suggest that the hippocampus is not a target. We have also shown a
global increase of 5-‐hydroxymethylcytosine in the hippocampus of patients with
schizophrenia, suggesting a possible alteration in the demethylation pathway. Determining
the exact targets of oxidative stress in bipolar disorder may lead to biomarker
development, better treatment and diagnostic options, and ultimately, a better quality of
life for patients.
iii
Acknowledgements
First and foremost I would like to thank my supervisors, Dr. Trevor Young and Dr. Ana
Andreazza, for their mentorship and for all of the opportunities they have given me. I am
extremely grateful to Dr. Young for his professional guidance, teaching me to think and
write logically, and to “tell a story.” I would like to express my deepest gratitude to Dr.
Andreazza for her understanding, encouragement, and for both professional and personal
support. Their knowledge and expertise has helped me grow as a scientist, and I could not
have hoped for better supervisors.
I would also like to thank my advisor, Dr. Ali Salahpour, for all of his support and advice,
especially during my first year seminar. Additionally, I would like to recognize all of the
members of the Young/Andreazza lab for their help, both inside and outside of the lab. A
special thank you to Larisse, Gustavo, and Helena, who welcomed me so warmly when I
moved to Toronto and began my Masters, and to Mathew, who I was fortunate enough to
work with over the summer and who “read my mind” during experiments. I am so
fortunate that I had the opportunity to work in such a kind and supportive lab.
Finally, I have to acknowledge my great group of friends, who have helped keep me
positive, especially my closest “Toronto friends”, Kayla, Dan, and Alex. And last, but
definitely not least, I want to thank my amazingly supportive parents who provided me the
inspiration and encouragement to keep following my heart and dreams, even when it took
me away from them.
iv
Table of Contents ABSTRACT .............................................................................................................................. II
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................................... III
TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................. IV
LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................... VI
LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................... VII
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ...................................................................................................... VIII
LIST OF APPENDICES ............................................................................................................... X
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Overview of bipolar disorder ................................................................................................................................. 1
1.2 The neurobiology of bipolar disorder: neuroimaging, inflammation, and neurotrophic factors .. 5 1.2.1 Neuroimaging studies and structural abnormalities ............................................................................................... 5 1.2.2 Inflammation ............................................................................................................................................................................. 7 1.2.3 Neurotrophic factors .............................................................................................................................................................. 8 1.2.4 Further biological abnormalities ...................................................................................................................................... 9
1.3 The neurobiology of bipolar disorder: oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction .............. 11 1.3.1 Mechanisms of oxidative damage in brain tissue ................................................................................................... 11 1.3.2 Mitochondrial dysfunction in bipolar disorder ....................................................................................................... 14 1.3.3 Oxidative stress damage in patients with bipolar disorder ............................................................................... 17 1.3.4 Neuroprotective effects of medication ........................................................................................................................ 18 1.3.5 Brief overview of epigenetic findings in bipolar disorder .................................................................................. 21
1.4 The use of biomarkers in psychiatric disease ............................................................................................... 22
1.5 Aim of the thesis ....................................................................................................................................................... 25 1.5.1 Statement of problem ......................................................................................................................................................... 25 1.5.2 Purpose of the Study and Objective .............................................................................................................................. 25 1.5.3 Statement of Research Hypotheses .............................................................................................................................. 26
CHAPTER 2. METHODS AND RESULTS FOR THE META-‐ANALYSIS OF OXIDATIVE STRESS
MARKERS IN BIPOLAR DISORDER .......................................................................................... 27
2.1 Methods for the meta-‐analysis of oxidative stress markers in bipolar disorder .............................. 27 2.1.1 Search strategy ...................................................................................................................................................................... 27 2.1.2 Selection Criteria .................................................................................................................................................................. 27 2.1.3 Statistical Analysis ............................................................................................................................................................... 28
v
2.2 Results for the meta-‐analysis of oxidative stress markers in bipolar disorder ................................ 29 2.2.1 Characteristics of included studies ............................................................................................................................... 29 2.2.2 Results of the meta-‐analysis ............................................................................................................................................ 30 2.2.3 Publication bias and sensitivity analysis .................................................................................................................... 34
CHAPTER 3. MATERIALS, METHODS, AND RESULTS FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF OXIDATIVE
STRESS DAMAGE IN POST-‐MORTEM HIPPOCAMPUS TISSUE ................................................. 35
3.1 Materials and methods for the measurement of oxidative stress damage and DNA alterations in the hippocampus ................................................................................................................................................................. 35 3.1.1 Postmortem brain tissue samples ................................................................................................................................. 35 3.1.2 Tissue homogenization ...................................................................................................................................................... 35 3.1.3 Mitochondrial subunit protein levels .......................................................................................................................... 36 3.1.4 Protein oxidative and nitrosative damage ................................................................................................................. 37 3.1.5 Lipid peroxidation ................................................................................................................................................................ 37 3.1.6 DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation .............................................................................................................. 38 3.1.7 Statistical analysis ................................................................................................................................................................ 39
3.2 Results of the measurement of oxidative stress damage and DNA alterations in the hippocampus ................................................................................................................................................................. 40 3.2.1 Patient demographics, family history, medications, and toxicology .............................................................. 40 3.2.2 Hippocampus may not be a target for mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative damage to proteins
and lipids .................................................................................................................................................................................. 42 3.2.3 Increased levels of 5-‐hmC in hippocampus from patients with SCZ but not in BD ................................. 42 3.2.4 Toxicology and medication effects ................................................................................................................................ 45
CHAPTER 4. DISCUSSION ....................................................................................................... 46
4.1 Oxidative stress markers in patients with bipolar disorder ..................................................................... 46
4.2 Hippocampus and bipolar disorder .................................................................................................................. 50
4.3 Limitations of this study ........................................................................................................................................ 54
CHAPTER 5. CONCLUSIONS, SIGNIFICANCE, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS .................................. 57
5.1 Overall conclusions from this study and significance ................................................................................. 57
5.2 Future directions ..................................................................................................................................................... 58
REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................... 59
APPENDIX A .......................................................................................................................... 85
vi
List of Tables
Table 1.1. Neuroprotective effects of lithium. There is substantial evidence showing chronic lithium treatment has many neuroprotective effects.
20
Table 2.1. Pooled statistics and meta-‐analysis of standardized mean group differences for oxidative stress markers in BD compared with healthy controls
31
Table 3.1. Demographic variables, postmortem interval, pH, and medications for bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and control groups
41
vii
List of Figures
Figure 1.1. Factors contributing to differences in neuronal vulnerability to oxidative stress
13
Figure 1.2. Alterations of the λ subcomplex of mitochondrial complex I in bipolar disorder
16
Figure 1.3. Potential benefits of determining and validating an oxidative stress biomarker in bipolar disorder
24
Figure 1.4. Potential biomarkers in bipolar disorder
24
Figure 2.1. Forest plots of standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals for oxidative stress markers in patients with bipolar disorder compared to healthy controls
32-‐33
Figure 3.1. Mitochondrial protein subunit levels for NDUFS8, NDUFV2, and NDUFS7 in post-‐mortem hippocampus of patients with bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and healthy controls
43
Figure 3.2. Protein oxidation and protein nitration in post-‐mortem hippocampus of patients with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia, and healthy controls
43
Figure 3.3. Levels of lipid peroxidation in post-‐mortem hippocampus of patients with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia, and healthy controls
44
Figure 3.4. Levels of DNA methylation and DNA hydroxymethylation in post-‐mortem hippocampus from patients with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia, and healthy controls
44
viii
List of Abbreviations
3-‐NT 3-‐nitrotyrosine
4-‐HNE 4-‐hydroxynonenal
5-‐hmC 5-‐hydroxymethlycytosine
5-‐mC 5-‐methylcytosine
ANOVA Analysis of variance
ATP Adenosine triphosphate
Bcl-‐2 B-‐cell lymphoma 2
BD Bipolar disorder
BDNF Brain-‐derived neurotrophic factor
CREB cAMP response element-‐binding protein
CTL Control
DNMT DNA methyl-‐transferase
DNP Dinitrophenyl
DSM Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
DTI Diffusion tensor imaging
DTT Dithiothreitol
ECL Enhanced chemiluminescence
EDTA Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
FA Fractional anisotropy
FMN Flavin mononucleotide
GPx Glutathione peroxidase
GWAS Genome wide association study
HBTRC Harvard Brain Tissue Resource Center
HPA Hypothalamic-‐pituitary-‐adrenal
HRP Horseradish peroxidase
ICD International Classification of Diseases
IL Interleukin
ix
LPH Lipid hydroperoxides
LSD Least significant difference
MBD Methyl-‐CpG-‐binding domain
MDD Major depressive disorder
NOS Not otherwise specified
PAGE Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
PCC Protein carbonyl content
PMI Post-‐mortem interval
PVDF Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
REDOX Reduction and oxidation
RNS Reactive nitrogen species
ROS Reactive oxygen species
SCZ Schizophrenia
SDS Sodium dodecyl sulfate
SOD Superoxide dismutase
TBARS Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances
TET Ten-‐eleven translocation
TNF Tumor necrosis factor
x
List of Appendices
Appendix A Table A1. Selected characteristics of all studies included in the meta-‐analysis of oxidative stress markers in bipolar disorder patients compared to healthy controls, sorted by sample type.
85
1
Chapter 1. Introduction
1.1 OVERVIEW OF BIPOLAR DISORDER
Bipolar disorder (BD) is within the top 10 leading causes of disability worldwide, is chronic
and recurrent, and is debilitating to both individuals and their families (Murray and Lopez,
1996). It is a mood disorder characterized by cycling episodes of depression and mania, an
elevated or agitated mood. Mania can present with different severities ranging from
hypomania, which is a mildly to moderately elevated or irritable mood, to psychosis, during
which the individual experiences some loss of contact with reality. Although BD is
considered a continuum, there are three subtypes and one non-‐specified type outlined in
the DSM-‐IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders). Briefly, diagnosis of BD
type I requires one or more manic episodes, BD type II requires at least one hypomanic and
at least one major depressive episode, and cyclothymia requires hypomanic episodes with
depressive episodes that do not meet the criteria for major depressive episodes. Finally the
DSM-‐IV provides another category called BD-‐NOS (not otherwise specified) when the
disorder does not fall into one of the other subtypes. The length of cycles in BD can vary
considerably with episodes lasting months or even cycling within a day or week. Onset and
development of BD can occur at any age; however 50% of cases are diagnosed by age 25
(Kessler et al., 2005), and the onset of BD tends to occur later for women than for men
(Arnold, 2003).
BD is diagnosed differentially through information obtained from patient self-‐reports,
structured interviews, family interviews, and clinician observation. BD can be difficult to
2
diagnose because of symptom overlap with other mood and psychotic disorders such as
major depressive disorder (MDD) and schizophrenia (SCZ). This may be clinically
significant since the initial presentation of BD is most often with depressive symptoms and
there may be a lag of months or years before mania presents and a diagnosis of BD is
determined (Berk et al., 2009). During this lag, a misdiagnosis of depression may lead to
ineffective treatment and potentially worse outcomes. For example, a misdiagnosis of BD as
unipolar depression may lead to inappropriate prescriptions, such as the use of
antidepressants without a mood-‐stabilizing drug, which may lead to mania and poor
clinical and functional outcomes (Phillips and Kupfer, 2013). Importantly, there is a current
push in psychiatry to find biological markers for BD (Frey et al., 2013). The development of
a biomarker would improve diagnostic accuracy and potentially allow intervention at early
stages of the illness, which may be critical to lowering the lifetime illness burden (Perry et
al., 1999, Miklowitz et al., 2013).
Bipolar disorder has a very high burden of illness with healthcare costs that are up to four
times higher than those of individuals without mental illness (Altamura et al., 2011). The
elevated healthcare costs of BD can be largely contributed to a very high prevalence of
medical comorbidities (Goetzel et al., 2003, Simon, 2003, Kupfer, 2005). In one study of
1379 patients with BD the most common comorbid medical illnesses were metabolic and
endocrine diseases (13.6%), diseases of the circulatory system (13.0%), and diseases of the
nervous system and sense organs (10.7%) (Beyer et al., 2005). There are significant gender
differences with the comorbidity of medical and psychiatric disorders; medical
comorbidities in women have more adverse effects on recovery from BD (Arnold, 2003). In
addition to increased medical illness in patients with BD, more than 60% of patients have a
3
psychopathological comorbidity (McElroy et al., 2001, Merikangas et al., 2007). BD is also
very highly associated with suicide. In one study comparing the lifetime rates of suicide
attempt between subjects with BD and subjects with any other DSM-‐III-‐defined Axis I
disorder (i.e. all psychological categories except mental retardation and personality
disorder), the authors found a strong relationship of suicide attempts in BD (29.2% and
4.2%, respectively)(Chen and Dilsaver, 1996). All of these factors, and many more,
contribute to a high burden of illness for BD including decreased quality of life and
decreased life expectancy (Angst et al., 2002, Fagiolini and Goracci, 2009).
BD is a chronic illness that requires long-‐term and multidisciplinary treatment.
Pharmacotherapy is a main treatment option for BD, however psychosocial interventions
such as cognitive behavior therapy, group psychoeducation, and interpersonal and social
rhythm therapy are also important aspects of management (Yatham et al., 2005). Due to
the episodic and chronic nature of BD, treatment is based on the current state of the
patient, while also considering maintenance for long-‐term success (Malhi et al., 2009).
Mood stabilizers, including lithium, anticonvulsants, and atypical antipsychotics, are often
the first line of medication for BD. In acute manic episodes, atypical antipsychotics such as
risperidone and olanzapine, may be beneficial alone or with lithium. Selective serotonin
reuptake inhibitors or other antidepressants may also be used in acute depression, with
caution, as an adjunct to lithium. Although there are a number of pharmacological options
for treatment, there is still an urgent need for more effective and tolerable medications to
improve overall functionality of patients with BD.
4
It is clear from family and twin studies that genetic factors play a role in BD and SCZ (Frey
et al., 2007). Studies have determined that there is a 10-‐fold increased risk of developing
BD if a first-‐degree relative is affected and heritability estimates are between 60-‐85% as
determined by monozygotic twin studies (Smoller and Finn, 2003). A meta-‐analysis of
whole genome linkage studies determined that the strongest evidence for susceptibility
loci is on 13q and 22q for BD (Badner and Gershon, 2002). Other meta-‐analyses using
genome wide association studies (GWAS) have found regions with genes implicated in the
cell cycle, neurogenesis, neuroplasticity, and neurosignaling (Scott et al., 2009, Thompson
et al., 2014). Of note, genetic epidemiology findings have provided evidence of many shared
genetic risk factors between BD, SCZ, and MDD (Craddock and Owen, 2005). Despite
decades of candidate gene association studies and whole-‐genome linkage scans, which have
found many regions of significance, no particular gene or alteration can explain BD. Very
large multi-‐group studies have shown shared polygenic contribution to risk between BD
and SCZ, illustrating the great complexity in the heritability of BD (Psychiatric GWAS
Consortium Bipolar Disorder Working Group, 2011).
Due to the biological complexity of BD, its pathophysiology is not known however,
abnormalities can be observed at all levels of physiology: tissue, cellular, molecular, and
genetic.
5
1.2 THE NEUROBIOLOGY OF BIPOLAR DISORDER: NEUROIMAGING, INFLAMMATION,
AND NEUROTROPHIC FACTORS
1.2.1 Neuroimaging studies and structural abnormalities
Neuroimaging studies have revealed structural differences and abnormalities in white
matter in BD. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is a magnetic resonance imaging technique
used to evaluate the diffusion of water in vivo, and can be utilized to determine
microstructural differences in white matter. The neural axons of white matter have an
internal fibrous structure that allows the rapid diffusion of water parallel to the tracts but
less diffusion perpendicularly; diffusion in axons is anisotropic, or directionally dependent.
The DTI measure of fractional anisotropy (FA) can be used to determine the direction of
water diffusion in white matter axons. Typically, white matter neuropathology causes the
anisotropy to decrease, which may be a result of either increased perpendicular (radial)
diffusion, or reduced parallel (axial) diffusion (Alexander et al., 2007). The biological
alteration leading to decreased FA is generally interpreted as changes in tract coherence
due to alterations in myelination, density, alignment, or diameter of the white matter
fibres.
A meta-‐analysis of whole brain DTI in BD found two clusters of decreased FA on the right
side of the brain; one in the right parahippocampal white matter and the second cluster
was close to the right anterior and subgenual cingulate cortex (Vederine et al., 2011). SCZ
is also associated with white matter abnormalities, but interestingly, different areas are
affected (Ellison-‐Wright and Bullmore, 2009). The clinical implications of these alterations
6
are not yet fully understood and, furthermore, larger studies with more subjects are
required to determine the effect of medications and disease characteristics. A meta-‐
analysis looking at what white matter tracts were most often implicated by changes in FA
in BD found changes in both anterior and posterior projection fibres, with larger tracts
implicated more frequently. These authors concluded that the anterior findings are
consistent with models of emotional regulation and hypothesized that the posterior
findings may be related to cognitive deficits (Nortje et al., 2013). Of clinical significance, a
recent study showed a strong association of FA abnormalities with increased serum lipid
peroxidation (Versace et al., 2014). Additionally, post-‐mortem studies have shown
reductions in the number, size, and density of glial cells as well as downregulation of
myelination and oligodendrocyte genes (Hakak et al., 2001, Uranova et al., 2001). Together
these demonstrate physiological cellular changes of white matter in BD, which may have
pathological implications.
There may also be structural changes in BD; the most consistently reported findings
include conservation of total cerebral volume with regional grey and white matter changes
in prefrontal, limbic, and midline networks, noncontingent ventriculomegaly, and increased
white matter hyperintensities (Emsell and McDonald, 2009). Decreased hippocampal
volume is characteristic of both schizophrenia and depression (Wright et al., 2000,
Campbell et al., 2004, Videbech and Ravnkilde, 2004, McDonald et al., 2006) however
multiple meta-‐analysis studies have not shown consistent changes in BD (Videbech and
Ravnkilde, 2004, Fusar-‐Poli et al., 2012, Thompson et al., 2014). Some other reported
structural findings in BD include lateral ventricular enlargement, decreased volume of the
subgenual cingulate gyrus and amygdala, and decreased grey matter in parietal lobe
7
(Swayze et al., 1990, Moorhead et al., 2007, Koo et al., 2008). Of interest, many studies have
demonstrated the effect of psychotropic medication on these structural changes in affective
disorders. For instance, lithium has been shown to increase hippocampal volumes in
patients that responded clinically to treatment (Bearden et al., 2008, Yucel et al., 2008,
Hajek et al., 2014). In contrast, antipsychotics and anticonvulsants generally had no
structural effect (Hafeman et al., 2012). The normalizing effect of lithium further
demonstrates the role of structural abnormalities, especially to the hippocampus, in the
pathophysiology of BD.
1.2.2 Inflammation
There is evidence that increased inflammation may play a role in the pathophysiology of
BD. Inflammation is part of a complex immune pathway to rid cells of foreign pathogens.
The process is highly regulated and depends on the balance between pro-‐ and anti-‐
inflammatory factors. BD patients in both manic and depressive states have increased
plasma levels of pro-‐inflammatory cytokines such as IL-‐2, IL-‐6, IL-‐8, and TNF-‐α. (O'Brien et
al., 2006, Kim et al., 2007, Brietzke et al., 2009). Furthermore, increased IL-‐1β, nuclear
factor-‐κB, and IL-‐1R proteins have been reported in post-‐mortem frontal cortex of patients
with BD (Rao et al., 2010). These alterations are also associated with disease state with
differences in cytokine levels arising consistently in mania or depression and euthymia
(Goldstein et al., 2009).
8
Importantly, increased cellular inflammation is linked to mitochondrial dysfunction and its
consequent oxidative stress. Inflammation and mitochondrial activity have a very complex
relationship: increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) from mitochondrial dysfunction can
activate redox-‐sensitive inflammatory pathways and pro-‐inflammatory factors can impair
mitochondrial function (Vaamonde-‐Garcia et al., 2012, Lopez-‐Armada et al., 2013).
1.2.3 Neurotrophic factors
Neurotrophins are a family of proteins that regulate the differentiation, proliferation, and
survival of neuronal cells. Alterations of neurotrophic factors are well documented in BD,
especially decreased levels of brain-‐derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in peripheral
samples (Chen et al., 2001, Cunha et al., 2006, Machado-‐Vieira et al., 2007b). In fact, a
polymorphism in the BDNF gene region (Val66Met) is frequently shown to be associated
with illness severity in many populations (Min et al., 2012, Miller et al., 2013, Chen et al.,
2014). There is evidence that BDNF levels reflect both current mood state and overall
illness progression. One review study found that BDNF levels were consistently decreased
in manic and depressive states, but not during euthymia, and furthermore, reflected
severity of the episodes (Fernandes et al., 2011). Comparing BDNF levels in patients with
different illness lengths showed a decrease of BDNF only in late-‐stage patients (Kauer-‐
Sant'Anna et al., 2009). There is also a lot of evidence indicating that alterations of
neurotrophic factors may underlie hippocampus atrophy in affective disorders (Frodl et al.,
2007, Schmidt and Duman, 2007, Son et al., 2014). In addition, oxidative stress may be
linked to BDNF activity through several pathways including cAMP response element-‐
9
binding protein (CREB), the NF-‐κB complex, MEK–Bcl-‐2 pathway (apoptotic), or through
endoplasmic reticulum stress responses (Kapczinski et al., 2008, Markham et al., 2012).
While neurotrophic factors probably play a role in pathophysiology of BD, they seem
unlikely to be a causal factor but may be more important in its neuroprogression (Berk et
al., 2011).
1.2.4 Further biological abnormalities
Many signal transduction processes may be involved in the neurobiology of BD, including
calcium signaling, glutamatergic and dopaminergic systems, the hypothalamic-‐pituitary-‐
adrenal (HPA) axis, and apoptotic pathways. Hyperactivity of the HPA axis is a consistent
finding in many psychiatric diseases (Pariante and Miller, 2001). The complex series of
interactions between the hypothalamus, anterior pituitary gland, and adrenal cortex are a
major part of the neuroendocrine system and play a role in stress response, among many
other body processes. Importantly, several brain regions involved in mood regulation,
including the prefrontal cortex and the hippocampus, regulate the HPA axis. Patients with
bipolar disorder have been shown to have an increased cortisol response to the
dexamethasone/corticotrophin-‐releasing hormone test, indicating HPA hyperactivity
(Watson et al., 2004, Duffy et al., 2012). Furthermore, decreased levels of glucocorticoid
receptor mRNA have been found in post-‐mortem brain samples (Webster et al., 2002).
These abnormalities may be secondary to stress in these disorders, and might not be a
causal factor in BD development, but could still be clinically relevant for treatment.
10
Alterations to apoptotic and cell-‐death pathways are well documented in BD and are
supported by genetic studies. There is increased pro-‐apoptotic and decreased anti-‐
apoptotic gene and protein expression in the postmortem brain samples from patients with
BD (Benes et al., 2006, Kim et al., 2010). The balance of pro-‐ and anti-‐apoptotic gene
expression is also affected by lithium treatment; one study found increased anti-‐apoptotic
and decreased pro-‐apoptotic gene expression in lithium responders one month after
treatment (Lowthert et al., 2012). Prior to apoptotic cell death there is shrinkage of the cell,
which may be the basis of the reduction of neuron size and density in BD (Gigante et al.,
2011b).
An elevated intracellular calcium level is one of the earliest reported biological
abnormalities in BD and since then, other studies have implicated components of calcium
signaling pathways (Dubovsky et al., 1989, Tan et al., 1990, Hough et al., 1999). One of the
strongest findings from GWAS are polymorphisms to a voltage-‐gate calcium channel. The
Bipolar Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric GWAS Consortium combined data from
16,731 samples and a replication sample of 46,918 individuals and further confirmed
alterations in the calcium channel CACNA1C (Psychiatric GWAS Consortium Bipolar
Disorder Working Group, 2011). Furthermore, alterations to this gene region have been
predictive of brain activity, especially in the prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, and amygdala
(Bigos et al., 2010, Jogia et al., 2011). Interestingly, mitochondria play a role in sequestering
and releasing intracellular calcium, which may connect to endoplasmic reticulum
dysfunction, altered apoptotic pathways, altered neuroplasticity, and impaired adaptation
to stress (Kato, 2008, Quiroz et al., 2008).
11
In addition to the mechanisms outlined thus far, mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative
stress play a very significant role in BD and will be discussed in the following section.
Clearly, the pathophysiology BD is very complex with many interacting systems and
pathways. While we may be a long way from uncovering every factor involved in BD
development, acquiring a further understanding of biological processes in BD is vital for
improved medications, diagnosis, and treatment.
1.3 THE NEUROBIOLOGY OF BIPOLAR DISORDER: OXIDATIVE STRESS AND
MITOCHONDRIAL DYSFUNCTION
1.3.1 Mechanisms of oxidative damage in brain tissue
Oxidation is a ubiquitous cellular process however modifications resulting in an imbalance
between antioxidants and pro-‐oxidants can cause damage. Reactive oxygen species (ROS)
and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) are signaling molecules that can cause cellular damage
to protein, lipids, and DNA when in abundance. The brain is especially vulnerable to
oxidative damage due to its high energy demand and reliance on oxidative metabolism. The
susceptibility is augmented: increased oxidative phosphorylation leads to increased ROS
and RNS and any decrease in aerobic metabolism due to damage will affect function of
these high-‐energy demand cells further. Importantly, neurons have multifactorial
differences in vulnerability to increased oxidative stress as shown in figure 1.1.
12
Mitochondria are the intracellular organelles responsible for the oxidative phosphorylation
pathway. This pathway, located on the inner mitochondrial membrane, supplies more than
95% of the total cellular energy requirement (Rezin et al., 2009). Briefly, the oxidative
phosphorylation pathway creates an electrochemical gradient by using energy from
multiple electron transfer (REDOX) reactions to pump protons from the inner
mitochondrial matrix to the intermembrane space. These protons then flow down their
electrochemical gradient to provide energy for ATP production. During this process, some
electrons “leak” from the pathway to form ROS and RNS. Importantly, this can lead directly
to the formation of the superoxide radical (O2•−) through the one-‐electron reduction of
oxygen (O2), which can dismutate to form hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and further react to
form the hydroxyl radical (HO•). Although the production of ROS and RNS is necessary and
ubiquitous, alterations to any one of the many antioxidant systems may have impacts on
the molecular functions from subtle changes in signaling pathways to apoptosis or necrosis.
Increased oxidative stress can damage the macromolecules of the cell with many
consequences. For example, damage to proteins may affect the function of receptors,
enzymes, DNA replication and repair machinery, etc. Direct damage to DNA may cause
mutations or regulatory alterations and damage to lipids can cause impairment to
membrane function. Oxidative damage to brain tissue is a factor in normal aging processes,
neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s, and in many psychiatric illnesses
including BD and SCZ (Barnham et al., 2004, Ng et al., 2008, Rezin et al., 2009). Increased
oxidative stress has damaging effects on signal transduction and cellular resilience, mainly
through damage to membrane lipids, proteins, and DNA/RNA.
13
Figure 1.1. Factors contributing to differences in neuronal vulnerability to oxidative stress.
Despite being exposed to the same levels of oxidative stress, some neurons will survive
while others die. This may help explain regional differences in the brain. Image adapted
from Wang and Michaelis, 2010.
14
1.3.2 Mitochondrial dysfunction in bipolar disorder
Substantial evidence from microarray and biochemical studies supports the presence of
mitochondrial dysfunction in BD. It is widely known that mitochondrial dysfunction leads
to increased oxidative stress (Cassarino and Bennett, 1999). In addition, mitochondrial
dysfunction has implications for many other cell processes that may contribute to the
pathophysiology of BD, including calcium regulation, cellular resiliency, and synaptic
plasticity (Quiroz et al., 2008). Expression of mRNA encoding mitochondrial genes is
altered in BD; studies have shown decreased gene expression in both the prefrontal cortex
(Iwamoto et al., 2005, Gigante et al., 2011a) and the hippocampus (Konradi et al., 2004).
Complex I is the entry point for electrons into the respiratory chain and can form
superoxide radicals in two ways: a reduced flavin mononucleotide (FMN) site on complex I
during decreased respiration reacts with O2 and reverse electron transfer due to high
potential energy (Murphy, 2009). The superoxide production during reverse electron
transfer is the highest that occurs in the mitochondria, making alterations to complex I of
great consequence. The altered mRNA expression of complex I subunits, determined by
microarray analysis, are mostly involved in the electron transfer process further
implicating mitochondrial complex I dysfunction and subsequent oxidative stress (Scola et
al., 2013). A summary of the altered subunits in the λ subcomplex of complex I is shown in
figure 1.2.
Importantly, decreased protein levels of mitochondrial complex I subunit NDUFS7 in post-‐
mortem prefrontal cortex samples was shown in our lab (Andreazza et al., 2010, Andreazza
et al., 2013). There are also functional mitochondrial changes in BD, including decreased
15
activity and morphological deviations (Cataldo et al., 2010, Gubert et al., 2013). Also of note
is the association of psychiatric illness with mitochondrial disorders, especially
mitochondrial encephalomyopathy with lactic acidosis and stroke-‐like episodes (Anglin et
al., 2012). Clearly, mitochondrial dysfunction is likely an important factor in the
pathophysiology of BD.
16
Figure 1.2. Alterations of the λ subcomplex of mitochondrial complex I in bipolar disorder,
found by microarray analysis. Importantly, the decreased subcomplexes are involved
directly with the electron transfer process, which may have an effect on oxidative stress in
the cell when the electrons cannot flow normally through the pathway. Adapted from Scola
et al., 2013.
17
1.3.3 Oxidative stress damage in patients with bipolar disorder
Oxidative stress damage has been measured in both peripheral samples, including
leukocytes, red blood cells, and serum, and in post-‐mortem brain samples, especially the
prefrontal cortex region. Multiple studies have shown increased lipid peroxidation,
DNA/RNA damage, protein damage, and altered antioxidant enzymes in blood samples
from patients with BD (Abdalla et al., 1986, Kuloglu et al., 2002, Savas et al., 2002, Yanik et
al., 2004, Savas et al., 2006, Andreazza et al., 2007a, Gergerlioglu et al., 2007, Selek et al.,
2008, Andreazza et al., 2009, Banerjee et al., 2012, Magalhaes et al., 2012, Raffa et al., 2012,
Soeiro-‐de-‐Souza et al., 2013, Versace et al., 2014). Although there are conflicting studies
measuring oxidative stress markers in BD, a 2008 meta-‐analysis from our laboratory found
a significant increase of lipid peroxidation and nitric oxide levels (Andreazza et al., 2008a).
Many studies suggest that the levels of oxidative damage in BD may be dependent on a
multitude of factors, including current mood episode, number of manic episodes, age of
onset, length of illness, and medications (Ozcan et al., 2004, Aliyazicioglu et al., 2007,
Andreazza et al., 2007a, Machado-‐Vieira et al., 2007b, Kunz et al., 2008, Kapczinski et al.,
2011).
Oxidative stress has also been examined in post-‐mortem brain tissue samples, especially
the prefrontal cortex. Increased lipid peroxidation, protein carbonylation and nitration, and
DNA damage has been shown in prefrontal cortex (Andreazza et al., 2010, Gawryluk et al.,
2011, Gigante et al., 2011a, Andreazza et al., 2013). Lipid peroxidation was shown to be
increased in the anterior cingulate cortex (Wang et al., 2009) and examinations of DNA
damage in this region had differing results (Benes et al., 2003, Buttner et al., 2007). Very
18
few studies of oxidative damage have been conducted on the hippocampus region. One
study of multiple brain areas found that the hippocampus was the only region with fully
intact DNA (Mustak et al., 2010) and another found a modest increase of oxidative damage
to nucleic acids in the cytoplasm of cells from the hippocampus, suggesting damage to RNA
(Che et al., 2010). It is important to determine the exact targets of oxidative stress damage
in BD to determine its pathophysiology.
1.3.4 Neuroprotective effects of lithium
There is substantial evidence that many effective medications for BD have neuroprotective
properties, especially lithium. Lithium has been shown to activate neurotrophic signaling
cascades, in particular through increasing the MAP kinase cascade activity, increasing
levels of bcl-‐2, and inhibiting glycogen synthase kinase (GSK)-‐3β (Manji et al., 2003). The
neuroprotective effects of lithium are outlined in table 1.1. In humans, one study found
increased lipid peroxidation and antioxidant enzyme activity in unmedicated, first-‐episode,
manic patients. In contrast, manic patients treated with lithium had a significant reduction
of antioxidant enzyme activity and lipid peroxidation levels (Machado-‐Vieira et al., 2007a).
In addition, mice studies have shown a positive effect of lithium on hippocampal
neurogenesis (Chen et al., 2000). The neuroprotective effects of lithium may also occur
through antioxidant mechanisms. For example, one study found a reduced superoxide
dismutase/catalase ratio in healthy volunteers after lithium treatment, which suggests
decreased oxidative stress by reducing hydrogen peroxide levels (Khairova et al., 2012).
Antidepressants also have a substantial neuroprotective effect; multiple studies have
19
shown that chronic antidepressant treatment increases neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus
cells of the hippocampus (D'Sa and Duman, 2002, Boldrini et al., 2012). The antioxidant and
neuroprotective properties of these medications further link oxidative stress to the
pathobiology of BD. Furthermore, the effects of these medications on the hippocampus
further suggest this regions involvement in BD and also demonstrate the importance of
considering medication status in biological human studies.
20
Table 1.1. Neuroprotective effects of lithium. There is substantial evidence showing chronic lithium treatment has many neuroprotective effects. Protects Cultured Cells of Rodent and Human neuronal Origin in Vitro+ from: Glutamate
High concentrations of calcium MPP+ β-‐amyloid Aging-‐induced cell death HIV regulatory protein, Tat HIV gp120 envelope protein Glucose deprivation Growth factor or serum deprivation Toxic levels of anticonvulsants Platelet activating factor (PAF) Aluminum toxicity Low potassium concentrations C2-‐ceramide Ouabain GSK-‐3β & staurosporine/heat shock β-‐bungarotoxin
Enhances Regeneration of Retinal Ganglion Cells Enhances Hippocampal Neurogenesis in Adult Mice Protects Rodent Brain in Vivo from: Cholingergic lesions
Radiation injury Middle cerebral artery occlusion (model of stroke) HIV gp120 envelope protein injection (model of HIV-‐associated dementia) Quinolinic Acid infusion (model of Huntington’s disease) Aluminum maltolate
Human Effects: No subgenual PFC gray matter volume reductions in cross-‐sectional MRI studies
No reductions in amygdala glial density in postmortem cell counting studies Increased total gray matter volumes on MRI compared to untreated BD patients in cross-‐sectional studies Increases in NAA (marker of neuronal viability) levels in BD patients in longitudinal studies Increased gray matter volumes in BD patients in longitudinal studies
Abbreviations: MPP+, 1-‐methyl-‐4-‐phenylpyridinium ion; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; GSK, glucogen synthase kinase; PFC, prefrontal cortex; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; BD, bipolar disorder; NAA, N-‐acetylaspartate. Table adapted from Manji et al., 2003.
21
1.3.5 Brief overview of epigenetic findings in bipolar disorder
The pathology of BD has genetic components, evidenced by family and twin studies that
show first-‐degree relatives of individuals with BD have a 10-‐fold increased risk of the
disorder compared to first-‐degree relatives of unaffected controls (Smoller and Finn,
2003). Decades of gene association studies have not revealed the genetic epidemiology
behind BD as it is very complex. Furthermore, epigenetic modifications may contribute to
the heritability of BD. Briefly, modifications to nucleotides in DNA have multiple effects, but
importantly, methylation at the 5’ position of cytosine, catalyzed by DNA methyl-‐
transferases (DNMTs), decreases gene transcription reducing expression. This “gene
silencing” occurs by impeding transcriptional proteins from binding, either directly or by
methyl-‐CpG-‐binding domain (MBD) proteins. MBDs can also recruit additional proteins
that alter chromatin structure, further silencing the gene. Hydroxylation of 5-‐
methylcytosine (5-‐mC), forming 5-‐hydroxymethylcytosine (5-‐hmC), is catalyzed by the ten-‐
eleven translocation (TET) proteins. This hydroxylation step is an intermediate to DNA
demethylation, and thus, DNA “activation” (Guo et al., 2011, He et al., 2011, Klug et al.,
2013). Epigenetic modifications, such as 5-‐mC, can persist in germ cells and can be passed
down to offspring, providing a mechanism for heritability (Petronis, 2010).
A number of epigenetic alterations have been shown in BD. Epigenetic alterations to loci
associated with mitochondrial function, brain development, and stress response, were
found in post-‐mortem frontal cortex of patients with psychosis and either SCZ or BD (Mill
et al., 2008, Grayson and Guidotti, 2013). It has also been shown that DNA methylation may
be different in monozygotic twins discordant for BD (Kuratomi et al., 2008). Interestingly,
22
oxidative stress may be associated with epigenetic changes, although few studies have been
conducted thus far. One study treated human neuroblastoma cells with hydrogen peroxide
to induce oxidative stress, which led to an imbalance between DNA methylation and
demethylation, between histone acetylation and deacetylation, and was also associated
with the activation of transcription factors (Gu et al., 2013).
1.4 THE USE OF BIOMARKERS IN PSYCHIATRIC DISEASE
Biomarkers are measurements that quantify biological processes and aid in diagnosis,
monitoring illness, and response to treatment (see figure 1.3). Psychiatry, unlike most
other fields of medicine, lacks specific and reliable biomarkers to diagnose and monitor
illness. Although clinician observation is important in many branches of medicine, most
also utilize diagnostic tests. BD can be especially difficult to diagnose because of symptom
overlap with other mood and psychotic disorders such as major depressive disorder and
schizophrenia and patients often present in a depressed state before mania first occurs. A
recent paper from the International Society for Bipolar Disorders Biomarkers Task Force
provides potential candidates for biomarkers in BD, including oxidative stress markers
(Frey et al., 2013; see figure 1.4). Thus far, oxidative stress markers have been utilized in a
research setting, however, with validation, some markers may become useful in clinical
settings. To be used as a clinical biomarker, certain criteria must be met including: 1) being
chemically stable, not prone to formation or loss during storage; 2) reflective of disease
23
onset/progression; 3) obtained by non-‐invasive sampling; 4) low intra-‐ and inter-‐
variability; and 5) measureable by accurate, precise, specific, sensitive, interference-‐free,
and validated assays (Dalle-‐Donne et al., 2006, Giustarini et al., 2009).
24
Figure 1.3. Potential benefits of determining and validating an oxidative stress biomarker in bipolar disorder. Adapted from Dalle-‐Donne et al., 2006.
Figure 1.4. Potential biomarkers in bipolar disorder. Adapted from Frey et al., 2013.
25
1.5 AIM OF THE THESIS
1.5.1 Statement of problem
Despite the prevalence and high burden of illness for BD, the pathophysiology of this
psychiatric illness remains unknown. It is vital to understand the biological mechanisms of
BD in order to develop better treatments, improve diagnosis, and ultimately increase the
quality of life for patients and their families. A meta-‐analysis of oxidative stress markers in
BD is vital to confirm biological differences. Previous meta-‐analyses of oxidative stress
markers in BD included peripheral samples only, however, we wanted to include post-‐
mortem brain samples in addition to increase sample size and to potentially reveal
additional oxidative damage. Most research conducted on oxidative stress markers in BD
used prefrontal cortex samples, however, it is necessary to determine whether other brain
regions are affected. The hippocampus is part of the limbic system, which is involved in
learning, memory formation and emotional regulation, and is also tightly connected to the
prefrontal cortex region. There is evidence from neuroimaging and microarray studies
implicating the hippocampus in BD. Importantly, microarray studies on samples from the
Harvard Brain Tissue Resource Center (HBTRC) revealed decreased mRNA expression of
several mitochondrial complex I and complex III subunits, suggesting abnormal energy
metabolism. Furthermore, results from our lab found increased oxidative stress damage to
the prefrontal cortex of this patient cohort.
1.5.2 Purpose of the Study and Objective
26
The purpose of this study is to consolidate recent literature of oxidative stress in BD and to
investigate mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress damage to proteins, lipids, and
DNA modifications in the hippocampus. Specifically, two objectives were defined:
1. Consolidate data on oxidative stress in BD by conducting a meta-‐analysis on
oxidative stress markers in both peripheral and post-‐mortem brain samples.
2. Measure oxidative stress markers in post-‐mortem hippocampus samples from
patients with BD or SCZ, and healthy, non-‐psychiatric controls.
1.5.3 Statement of Research Hypotheses
1. Based on a previous meta-‐analysis from our laboratory and a review of the
literature, we hypothesized that increased levels of nitric oxide and lipid
peroxidation would be the most significant marker in BD.
2. The hippocampus has been implicated in the pathophysiology of BD and results
from microarray studies suggest abnormal energy metabolism. Furthermore,
biochemical studies in the prefrontal cortex region of this patient cohort revealed
increased oxidative stress damage. Based on this evidence, we hypothesized that the
hippocampus region would be a target of oxidative stress damage in BD.
27
Chapter 2. Methods and results for the meta-‐analysis of oxidative stress
markers in bipolar disorder
2.1 METHODS FOR THE META-‐ANALYSIS OF OXIDATIVE STRESS MARKERS IN BIPOLAR
DISORDER
2.1.1 Search strategy
A prospective protocol for this study was developed a priori with search terms and
inclusion criteria chosen in an attempt to include all relevant publications. Web of Science,
BIOSIS, and MEDLINE databases were searched for the term bipolar disorder with the
following: oxidative stress, reactive oxygen species, free radicals, antioxidant, nitric oxide,
lipid peroxidation, TBARS, protein carbonyl, 3-‐nitrotyrosine, catalase, glutathione, DNA
oxidation, DNA damage, or DNA fragmentation. References cited in publications found
using these search terms were also reviewed for any relevant studies not already identified
and all searches were conducted prior to May 2013 with no time span specified.
2.1.2 Selection Criteria
One reviewer screened all abstracts of potentially relevant publications. Studies were
included if they met the following criteria: (1) measured levels of one or more of the
following oxidative stress markers in both patients with bipolar disorder and healthy
controls: superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione peroxidase, protein carbonyl, 3-‐
28
nitrotyrosine, nitric oxide, DNA/RNA damage, and lipid peroxidation; (2) were reported in
an original research paper in a peer-‐reviewed journal; and (3) if they adequately described
their samples (e.g. diagnostic criteria, source of samples, and storage) and methods such
that the experiments could be replicated (or included appropriate references). Studies
were retained regardless of the measurement method or sample type (peripheral or post-‐
mortem brain). Additionally, authors were contacted for mean values and standard
deviations when their methods were appropriate but data was expressed in a graph or
figure only (Andreazza et al., 2009, Wang et al., 2009, Che et al., 2010, Mustak et al., 2010,
Gawryluk et al., 2011, Gigante et al., 2011a, Andreazza et al., 2013). For all included studies,
the disease state of BD patients, number of drug-‐free patients, sample type, type of
assay/measurement, and results were recorded.
2.1.3 Statistical Analysis
The meta-‐analysis of pooled standardized mean differences was conducted using Review
Manager software (Version 5.2, Copenhagen) from The Cochrane Collaboration. The effect
sizes for the standardized mean differences were expressed through Hedges’s G and a Z-‐
score; a p-‐value of <0.05 for Z was considered statistically significant. A random-‐effects
model was used and studies were weighted by the generic inverse variance method. The
between-‐study heterogeneity was determined using the Cochran Q statistic and expressed
using I2 and τ2. Publication bias was assessed by visually inspecting funnel plots and
applying Egger’s regression test with p<0.1 as statistically significant (Egger et al., 1997)
using the software program Comprehensive Meta-‐analysis (Borenstein et al., 2005). A one-‐
29
study removed sensitivity analysis was performed for each oxidation marker by manually
excluding each study included in the analysis to determine robustness. In cases where
patients were separated into subgroups (i.e. manic, depressed, or euthymic), the means and
standard deviations were pooled to compare all bipolar groups with healthy controls; 15
out of 27 studies included information about the patient disease state. All comparisons
were two-‐tailed and 95% confidence intervals are expressed where applicable. A weighted
linear meta-‐regression was conducted using SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22 (IBM)
with sample type as a comparator.
2.2 RESULTS FOR THE META-‐ANALYSIS OF OXIDATIVE STRESS MARKERS IN BIPOLAR
DISORDER
2.2.1 Characteristics of included studies
In total, 226 studies were screened and 29 fit the selection criteria. Of the 226 screened
papers, 68 were review articles, 48 were animal or cell studies, 51 did not measure an
included marker of oxidative stress, 28 were genetic studies, and 2 did not include a
healthy control group. Twenty-‐seven studies were included in the meta-‐analysis out of the
29 that fit the selection criteria; 2 studies were excluded due to missing means and
standard deviations (Benes et al., 2003, Buttner et al., 2007). All diagnoses, except for one,
were established based on DSM-‐IV criteria; the one exception was published by Abdalla et
30
al. in 1986 and used ICD-‐9 (International Classification of Diseases) criteria, which was
deemed appropriate for inclusion. After pooling the included studies, there were a total of
995 unique BD patients and 928 healthy controls. Appendix A outlines the characteristics
of these studies including the disease state of BD patients, number of drug-‐free patients,
sample type, type of assay, and overall results.
2.2.2 Results of the meta-‐analysis
A total of 8 oxidative stress markers were included in this analysis: superoxide dismutase,
catalase, glutathione peroxidase, protein carbonyl, 3-‐nitrotyrosine, nitric oxide, DNA/RNA
damage, and lipid peroxidation. Table 2.1 outlines the pooled statistics and meta-‐analysis
for the oxidative stress markers in patients with BD and controls. In total, 3 out of these 8
oxidative stress markers showed a statistically significant change in BD patients compared
to healthy controls: lipid peroxidation, nitric oxide level, and DNA/RNA damage. Forest
plots of all standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals are shown in
figure 2.1.
31
Table 2.1. Pooled statistics and meta-‐analysis of standardized mean group differences for oxidative stress markers in BD compared with healthy controls
Marker Number of studies
Total N Effect Heterogeneity BD CTL Hedges’s g (95% CI) Z P(Z) τ 2 I2
Lipid peroxidation * 12 517 426 1.62 (1.02, 2.22) 5.31 < 0.00001 1.07 93%
Nitric oxide * 6 203 153 0.93 (0.05, 1.82) 2.06 0.04 1.13 93%
DNA/RNA damage * 4 117 113 3.13 (1.42, 4.84) 3.59 0.0003 3.14 94%
Superoxide dismutase
12 440 376 0.12 (-‐0.82, 1.07) 0.26 0.80 2.71 97%
Catalase 5 200 154 -‐1.58 (-‐3.46, 0.30) -‐ 1.65 0.10 4.42 98%
Protein carbonyl 5 199 255 0.62 (-‐0.40, 1.64) 1.19 0.23 1.28 96%
Glutathione peroxidase
8 272 273 -‐0.05 (-‐0.47, 0.36) 0.26 0.80 0.27 79%
3-‐Nitrotyrosine 3 90 100 1.17 (-‐0.16, 2.50) 1.72 0.09 1.28 93%
Abbreviations: BD, Bipolar disorder; CTL, Controls * Statistically significant (P<0.05)
32
33
Figure 2.1. Forest plots of standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals for oxidative stress markers in patients with bipolar disorder compared to healthy controls 1 4-‐hydroxynonenal 2 Lipid hydroperoxides 3 Single-‐stranded DNA breaks 4 Double-‐stranded DNA breaks Note: Mustak 20103 and Mustak 20104 used the same study population and Andreazza 20131 and Andreazza 20132 used the same study population. In the meta-‐analysis each study was weighted as one, despite having two relevant measurements, to prevent one sample population from being overrepresented.
34
2.2.3 Publication bias, sensitivity analysis, and meta-‐regression
Given the small number of studies, we performed a one-‐study removed sensitivity analysis
by excluding each study individually. The Z-‐Value remained significant for DNA/RNA
damage and lipid peroxidation and the effect size for superoxide dismutase and glutathione
peroxidase remained essentially unchanged in direction and magnitude after the removal
of each study individually. The sensitivity analysis of protein carbonyl, 3-‐nitrotyrosine,
catalase, and nitric oxide showed that these results are not very robust and should be
interpreted cautiously: (1) for protein carbonyl, the removal of Andreazza et al. (2009)
caused the Z-‐Value to increase from 1.19 (p=0.23) to 2.13 (p=0.03); (2) for 3-‐nitrotyrosine,
the removal of Andreazza et al. (2013) caused the Z-‐Value to increase from 1.72 (p=0.09) to
4.32 (p=0.000015); (3) for catalase, the removal of Machado-‐Vieira et al. (2007) caused the
Z-‐Value to decrease from -‐1.65 (p=0.10) to -‐3.26 (p=0.024); and (4) for nitric oxide, the
removal of Ozcan et al. (2004) caused the Z-‐value to increase from 2.06 (p=0.04) to 5.39
(p<0.00001). Publication bias, measured by Egger’s regression test, was negative for all
markers: superoxide dismutase (95% CI=-‐38.7 to 6.0; p=0.13), catalase (95% CI=-‐43.0 to
24.9; p=0.45), glutathione peroxidase (95% CI=-‐9.8 to 7.4; p=0.74), lipid peroxidation
(95% CI=-‐7.2 to 8.5; p=0.87), protein carbonyl (95% CI=-‐50.7 to 58.4; p=0.79), nitric oxide
(95% CI=-‐53.7 to 55.9; p=0.95), 3-‐nitrotyrosine (95% CI=-‐146.4 to 130.6; p=0.60), and
DNA/RNA damage (95% CI=-‐2.7 to 14.4; p=0.12). A weighted linear regression analysis did
not reveal an interaction of sample type with any significant marker of oxidative stress:
lipid peroxidation (β=-‐0.119, p=0.781), nitric oxide (β=1.109, p=0.297), or DNA/RNA
damage (β=-‐0.054, p=0.575).
35
Chapter 3. Materials, methods, and results for the measurement of
oxidative stress damage in post-‐mortem hippocampus tissue
3.1 MATERIALS AND METHODS FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF OXIDATIVE STRESS
DAMAGE AND DNA ALTERATIONS IN THE HIPPOCAMPUS
3.1.1 Postmortem brain tissue samples
Hippocampus samples were generously donated by the Harvard Brain Tissue Resource
Center (HBTRC) and all patients provided consent to HBTRC prior to death. The 46
participants were divided into three groups: 19 non-‐psychiatric controls, 15 SCZ, and 12
BD. Two senior psychiatrists, using DSM-‐IV criteria, confirmed all diagnoses
retrospectively through patient records. Demographic information, post-‐mortem interval
(hours prior to freezing at -‐80°C; PMI), brain pH, and toxicology at time of death were
known. Medications prescribed within a year of death, family psychiatric history, and
comorbidities were determined through patient records. Medications were divided into
four groups: lithium, other mood stabilizers, antidepressants, or antipsychotics.
Antipsychotics were further divided into either typical or atypical. The investigators were
blind to diagnosis and all other variables throughout all experiments and measurements
with the random numeric code lifted only after all analysis was completed.
3.1.2 Tissue homogenization
36
Whole tissue homogenates were prepared as described by Smith (1967) with minor
modifications. Briefly, hippocampus tissues were homogenized in buffer (0.25 M sucrose,
2mM EDTA, 10mM Tris HCl; pH 7.2) at a ratio of 10 µL/mg of tissue. Samples were
homogenized using sonification (5 seconds at 25% amplitude; Branson Ultrasonics
Corporation, CT, USA) then centrifuged at 1000g and 4°C for 10 minutes. The supernatant
was kept on ice and the pellet was resuspended in buffer, mechanically homogenized, and
recentrifuged. Supernatants were combined and protein concentration was determined
using the Bradford assay (Bradford reagent, Sigma-‐Aldrich, MO, USA).
3.1.3 Mitochondrial subunit protein levels
Protein levels of complex I subunits NDUFS7, NDUFS8, and NDUFV2 were determined
through Western blotting followed by immunoblotting. Whole tissue homogenates were
mixed with SDS-‐PAGE sample buffer (50mM Tris HCl (pH 6.8), 100mM DTT, 2% SDS, 0.1%
bromophenol blue, 10% glycerol) to a concentration of 10 μg tissue/15 μL buffer. These
samples were loaded on 12% acrylamide sodium dodecyl sulfate-‐polyacrylamide
electrophoresis gels, separated, and transferred to PVDF membranes. Blots were incubated
with the primary antibody for 2 hours at room temperature (NDUFS7 [Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, #98644], 1:400 dilution; NDUFS8 [Abcam #67106], 1:640 dilution; NDUFV2
[Abcam #96117], 1:1000 dilution), followed by a secondary antibody conjugated to
horseradish peroxidase (1 hour at room temperature). Immunoreactive bands were
detected with Amersham ECL Prime Western Blotting Detection Reagent (GE Healthcare
37
Life Sciences, Ohio, USA) and analyzed densitometrically using VersaDoc (Bio-‐Rad, USA).
Blots were normalized by immunoblotting with anti-‐β-‐actin antibody, an established
loading control.
3.1.4 Protein oxidative and nitrosative damage
Protein oxidation damage was determined by measuring protein carbonyl content using
the OxyBlot Protein Oxidation Detection kit (Millipore Co, USA, #S7150) with
modifications. Briefly, protein side chains were derivatized with 2,4-‐
dinitrophenylhydrazone (DNP-‐hydrazone) through the reaction of 2,4-‐
dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) with carbonyl groups. The DNP-‐derivatized proteins were
spotted onto PVDF membrane and immunoblotted with a primary antibody specific to the
DNP moiety, followed by HRP-‐conjugated secondary antibody, and detection with ECL
reagent. Nitrosative damage to proteins was determined by measuring the levels of 3-‐
nitrotyrosine using Western blotting as described above (anti-‐3-‐nitrotyrosine antibody,
Abcam #7048; 1:500 dilution). Blots were normalized using MemCode Reversible Protein
Stain Kit for PVDF Membranes (Thermo Scientific Pierce Protein Biology Products, Illinois,
USA).
3.1.5 Lipid peroxidation
38
The level of lipid peroxidation was determined by measuring total lipid hydroperoxides
and 4-‐hydroxynonenal, a degradation product. Total hydroperoxides were measured using
a colorimetric kit (Lipid Hydroperoxide (LPO) Assay Kit, Cayman Chemical, San Antonio,
USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, lipid hydroperoxides were
extracted from samples using a methanol/chloroform mixture (0°C, 1500g, 5 minutes) and
incubated with chromogen at room temperature. The absorbance was read at 500 nm and
compared to a standard curve. 4-‐hydroxynonenal was measured using OxiSelect HNE-‐His
Adduct ELISA Kit (Cell Biolabs, Inc., USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. HNE-‐
His adducts are probed with an anti-‐HNE-‐His antibody followed by HRP conjugated
secondary antibody and chemiluminescence detection.
3.1.6 DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation
DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation were determined through the measurement of
5-‐mC and 5-‐hmC, respectively. Both were measured using an immuno-‐dot blot method
adapted from Ko et al. (2010) and Yang et al. (2013). Genomic DNA was extracted from
whole hippocampus tissue using GenElute Mammalian Genomic DNA Miniprep Kit (Sigma-‐
Aldrich, MO, USA), according to manufacturer’s instructions. The CpGenome 5-‐mC and 5-‐
hmC DNA Standard Set containing positive controls of 100% 5-‐mC or 5-‐hmC and a negative
control containing unmodified cytosine was used (Millipore, MA, USA), and a DNA curve to
standardize technique was completed. 50 ng genomic DNA in Tris-‐EDTA buffer and
denaturation solution was spotted onto PVDF membranes and allowed to dry, followed by
DNA UV cross-‐linking (120,000 microjoules per cm2 for 5 minutes; CL-‐1000, Ultra-‐Violet
39
Products). The blots were then incubated for 2 hours at room temperature with primary
antibody specific for 5-‐mC (Millipore clone 33D3; 1:1000 dilution) or 5-‐hmC (Millipore
clone AB3/63.3; 1:100 dilution). This was followed by a 40 minute incubation with HRP-‐
conjugated secondary antibody and detection with Amersham ECL Prime Western Blotting
Detection Reagent (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Ohio, USA). Membranes were imaged using
VersaDoc system (Bio-‐Rad, USA) and relative levels of 5-‐mC and 5-‐hmC were determined
densitometrically using Image Lab software (Bio-‐Rad, USA).
3.1.7 Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22
(IBM). Data distribution was determined by Kolmogorav-‐Smirnov test. The variables
NDUFS7 (Z= 0.203; p=0.000), NDUFS8 (Z= 0.241; p= 0.000), NDUFV2 (Z= 0.179; p= 0.001),
and 5-‐mC (Z= 0.140; p= 0.027), did not follow Gaussian distribution; lipid hydroperoxides
(Z= 0.102; p= 0.200), 4-‐hydroxynonenal (Z= 0.105; p= 0.200), protein carbonyl content (Z=
0.082; p= 0.200), 3-‐nitrotyrosine (Z=0.111; p= 0.200), and 5-‐hmC (Z= 110; p=0.200) did
have a normal distribution. To determine between-‐group differences we used one-‐way
ANOVA followed by LSD post-‐hoc test for parametric variables and Kruskal-‐Wallis test for
non-‐parametric variables. Differences were considered significant at p≤0.05. To determine
whether there was an effect of age, pH, and PMI on the results, Pearson’s correlation
coefficient for parametric variables and Spearman’s Rank Correlation for nonparametric
variables were used. One-‐way ANOVA was used to determine the relation of age with
biochemical data. Since there was no correlation between any of these factors with
40
biochemical data, we did not do further analysis. Medication effects were determined using
one-‐way ANOVA for parametric variables and Kruskal-‐Wallis test for non-‐parametric
variables.
3.2 RESULTS OF THE MEASUREMENT OF OXIDATIVE STRESS DAMAGE AND DNA
ALTERATIONS IN THE HIPPOCAMPUS
3.2.1 Patient demographics, family history, medications, and toxicology
Patient demographic and medication information can be found in table 3.1. Subjects in the
study included participants with BD (n=12), SCZ (n=15), and non-‐psychiatric controls
(n=19). Age ranged from 18-‐87, PMI from 13 hours to 38 hours, and pH from 5.6 to 7.0;
there were no significant differences between groups for these variables. Psychiatric
medications prescribed at time of death were known and included lithium (n=6), mood
stabilizers (n=5), antidepressants (n=4), and antipsychotics (n=20).
41
Table 3.1. Demographic variables, postmortem interval, pH, and medications for bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and control groups
Bipolar disorder (n=12)
Schizophrenia (n=15)
Healthy controls (n=19)
Age, mean (SEM) [range] 58.5 (6.5) [18-‐86] 62.4 (3.5) [46-‐87] 59.5 (3.6) [18-‐80] F2,46 = 0.185; p = 0.8321
Gender, No. (%) Male 3 (25.0) 11 (73.3) 14 (73.7) Female 9 (75.0) 4 (26.7) 5 (26.3)
PMI, mean (SEM) [range] 20.67 (1.26) [13-‐27] 23.07 (1.78) [16-‐38] 22.16 (0.74) [16-‐30] F2,46 = 0.727; p = 0.4891
pH, mean (SEM) [range] 6.33 (0.08) [5.6-‐6.7] 6.45 (0.08) [5.72-‐7.0] 6.45 (0.05) [6.11-‐6.86] F2,46 = 0.987; p = 0.3811
Medication, No. (%) Lithium 5 (41.7) 1 (6.7) Mood-‐stabilizers 3 (25.0) 2 (13.3) Antidepressants 2 (16.7) 2 (13.3) Antipsychotics (any) 9 (75.0) 11 (73.3) Atypical 1 (8.3) 2 (13.3) Typical 5 (41.7) 8 (53.3) Unknown 3 (25.0) 1 (6.7)
Abbreviations: PMI, postmortem interval; SEM, standard error of the mean 1One-‐way ANOVA
42
3.2.2 Hippocampus may not be a target for mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative
damage to proteins and lipids
We assessed the levels of mitochondrial complex I subunits NDUFS7, NDUFS8, and
NDUFV2, in homogenized tissue from the hippocampus and found no differences between
SCZ, BD, or control groups. These results are shown in figure 3.1. Two indicators of
oxidative damage to proteins were evaluated: 3-‐nitrotyrosine and protein carbonyl levels.
Lipid damage was evaluated by measuring total lipid hydroperoxides, and 4-‐
hydroxynonenal, which is a product of lipid peroxidation. In the hippocampus we did not
find any differences between groups for 3-‐nitrotyrosine, protein carbonyl, 4-‐
hydroxynonenal, or total lipid hydroperoxides. Results for protein damage are shown in
figure 3.2 and for lipid damage in figure 3.3.
3.2.3 Increased levels of 5-‐hmC in hippocampus from patients with SCZ but not in
BD
As an exploratory analysis, we evaluated the levels of global methylation and
hydroxymethylation. We found significant differences between groups for 5-‐hmC
(F2,43=4.397; p=0.018), with a significant increase in SCZ (p=0.028) compared to controls.
There were no between-‐group differences for 5-‐mC; these results are shown in figure 3.4.
After controlling for covariates (age, PMI, pH, and gender), the results for 5-‐hmC remained
significant.
43
Figure 3.1. Mitochondrial protein subunit levels for NDUFS8 (A), NDUFV2 (B), and NDUFS7 (C) in post-‐mortem hippocampus of patients with bipolar disorder (BD), schizophrenia (SCZ), and healthy controls (CTL). Between-‐group differences were analyzed using Kruskall-‐Wallis test.
Figure 3.2. Protein oxidation (protein carbonyl content; A) and protein nitration (3-‐nitrotyrosine, 3-‐NT; B) in post-‐mortem hippocampus of patients with bipolar disorder (BD) or schizophrenia (SCZ), and healthy controls (CTL).
A B C
A B
44
Figure 3.3. Levels of lipid peroxidation in post-‐mortem hippocampus of patients with bipolar disorder (BD) or schizophrenia (SCZ), and healthy controls (CTL). (A) 4-‐hydroxynonenal (4-‐HNE) levels; and (B) total lipid hydroperoxides.
Figure 3.4. Levels of DNA methylation (5-‐methylcytosine, 5-‐mC; A) and DNA hydroxymethylation (5-‐hydroxymethylcytosine, 5-‐hmC; B) in post-‐mortem hippocampus from patients with bipolar disorder (BD) or schizophrenia (SCZ), and healthy controls (CTL). Between-‐group differences were determined using Kruskal-‐Wallis test for 5-‐mC and one-‐way ANOVA followed by LSD post-‐hoc test for 5-‐hmC; *p<0.05.
A B
A B *
45
3.2.4 Toxicology and medication effects
We examined the effect of prescribed medications and toxicology at the time of death.
Medication effects were determined using one-‐way ANOVA for parametric variables and
Kruskal-‐Wallis test for non-‐parametric variables. No medication effects were found for any
measured variable. Toxicology at the time of death was also known and explored. We did
not find differences between subjects who were positive for opiates (n=10),
benzodiazepines (n=3), barbiturates (n=3), or amphetamines (n=2), compared to those
with no substance detected (n=28).
46
Chapter 4. Discussion
4.1 OXIDATIVE STRESS MARKERS IN PATIENTS WITH BIPOLAR DISORDER
A meta-‐analysis was conducted to consolidate and examine many different studies
measuring oxidative stress markers in BD. A total of twenty-‐seven papers were included in
the meta-‐analysis, which comprised of 971 unique patients with BD and 886 healthy
controls. Eight markers were analyzed: superoxide dismutase, catalase, protein carbonyl,
glutathione peroxidase, 3-‐nitrotyrosine, lipid peroxidation, nitric oxide, and DNA/RNA
damage. The meta-‐analysis of standardized means was conducted using a random-‐effects
model with generic inverse weighting. The results of the meta-‐analysis further supports the
presence of oxidative damage in BD; specifically, our analysis showed overall increased
lipid peroxidation, increased DNA/RNA damage, and increased levels of nitric oxide in BD
patients compared to healthy controls.
In the meta-‐analysis, there is a very strong effect size of lipid peroxidation in BD compared
to healthy controls and this increased lipid peroxidation is shown consistently in both
serum and post-‐mortem brain samples. Lipids are very prone to oxidative damage due to
their large size and high number of unsaturated bonds. Oxidative damage to these lipids
disrupts cell membranes and the end products of peroxidation are toxic. Since lipids
account for about 70% of the dry weight of myelin, the main component of white matter,
this damage may play a role in the pathophysiology of BD. Interestingly, a recent paper
examined whether peripheral lipid peroxidation levels were associated with white matter
abnormalities and showed that 59% and 51% of fractional anisotropy and radial diffusivity
47
differences, respectively, could be explained by variation in lipid hydroperoxide levels
(Versace et al., 2014). There is evidence that lipid peroxidation in serum is decreased with
medication (Aliyazicioglu et al., 2007); however, this was not accounted for in this analysis
and yet the effect size was strong despite this potentially lowering effect of medication.
Lipid peroxidation is a promising potential marker since it can be measured in serum and
holds promise to reflect brain alterations. If validated, there is a possibility for markers of
lipid peroxidation to be used as a prognostic biomarker along with neuroimaging tests.
Furthermore, the widely used TBARS or LPH assays for quantification do not require
specialized skills or equipment beyond that in a normal diagnostic laboratory.
There are many pathways through which increased oxidative stress can damage DNA or
RNA including scission or breaks and base modifications; these two types of oxidative
damage were included in this analysis. This is the first time a meta-‐analysis has examined
DNA and RNA oxidative damage in BD and our results show damage was increased in all
studies, which includes post-‐mortem brain samples and peripheral samples (Andreazza et
al., 2007b, Che et al., 2010, Mustak et al., 2010, Soeiro-‐de-‐Souza et al., 2013). This increase
in DNA scission and base hydroxylation may lead to increased cell necrosis and subsequent
inflammation of nearby tissues (Kim et al., 2001). Oxidative stress to cells may also induce
epigenetic changes through different mechanisms including DNA hypomethylation and
histone acetylation (Gu et al., 2013). Two of the included studies measured base
modifications in DNA and RNA (Che et al., 2010, Soeiro-‐de-‐Souza et al., 2013). The two
important nucleoside oxidation targets are guanosine and cytosine. Guanosine is the most
readily oxidizable base and its hydroxylation to 8-‐hydroxy-‐2-‐deoxyguanosine is often
considered an indicator of overall DNA and RNA damage. Cytoplasmic RNA is especially
48
vulnerable to this hydroxylation, and damage to mRNA causes improper translation and
protein aggregation (Shan et al., 2003). Hydroxylation of guanosine bases may also
promote hypomethylation through conformation changes in the DNA that may affect the
ability of methyl binding proteins to recognize their CpG island target. The oxidation of 5-‐
mC to 5-‐hmC is an important step for epigenetic regulation and is normally controlled by
the enzyme TET oxidase (Matarese et al., 2011). This hydroxylation step ultimately leads to
DNA demethylation and, therefore, often an increase in gene expression (Klug et al., 2013).
Upon review of the literature, it appears that DNA/RNA oxidation damage is very region
specific in post-‐mortem brain samples. For example, the 2010 study by Mustak et al. found
increased single-‐ and double-‐stranded breaks to genomic DNA in the parietal, temporal and
occipital lobes, thalamus, cerebellum, hypothalamus, medulla, pons, and frontal cortex, but
not in the hippocampus of bipolar patients. Another study that used post-‐mortem
hippocampus suggested that damage in this region occurs predominantly in the cytoplasm
of cells and thus affects RNA more than DNA (Che et al., 2010). One study, not included in
this meta-‐analysis, measured the methylation patterns of monozygotic twins discordant for
BD and found differences in 4 of the 10 explored regions (Kuratomi et al., 2008). Clearly,
these oxidative modifications to DNA and RNA may impact the heritability of bipolar
disorder and should be further investigated.
The two products of oxidative protein damage included in this meta-‐analysis, 3-‐
nitrotyrosine and protein carbonyl content, were not significant. 3-‐Nitrotyrosine is a
product of protein nitrosative damage that occurs when peroxynitrite/carbon dioxide-‐
derived radicals attack the hydroxyl group of tyrosine residues. Similarly, protein
carbonylation occurs when peroxide or oxygen radicals attack amine groups in amino acid
49
side-‐chains, often through a metal-‐cation catalyzed reaction. Oxidative damage to proteins
in BD is likely very transient due to the cell’s ability to remove these products and,
therefore, it is vital to study patients at different stages of the illness and in different
disease phases in order to fully determine the role protein damage may play in BD.
Nitration of proteins is dependent on levels of nitric oxide and an increase of nitric oxide in
BD patients was found in our meta-‐analysis. Nitric oxide is a widely used signaling
molecule in the nervous system; however, it can react with the free oxygen radical,
superoxide, to form the more unstable peroxynitrite. When the antioxidant system is
overwhelmed, peroxynitrite and its derivatives may cause damage to cellular lipids,
proteins, and nucleic acids. The increased nitric oxide levels in BD patients are discussed
further in the previous meta-‐analysis (Andreazza et al., 2008a) and no relevant papers
have since been published.
The antioxidant enzymes examined in the meta-‐analysis (glutathione peroxidase,
superoxide dismutase and catalase) did not show any overall significant changes in BD
compared to healthy controls, however, it still remains a possibility that there are changes
to larger antioxidant systems. Superoxide dismutase breaks the highly reactive and
damaging superoxide anion into molecular oxygen and hydrogen peroxide through a
copper-‐catalyzed redox reaction. The enzymes glutathione peroxidase and catalase can
then remove hydrogen peroxide from cells through further reduction. Two studies found
that the ratio of superoxide dismutase to glutathione peroxidase and catalase was
increased in manic and depressed patients but not in euthymic patients (Andreazza et al.,
2007a, Andreazza et al., 2007b). Consistent with these observations, the mood stabilizer
lithium that is typically effective in BD patients, significantly decreased the superoxide
50
dismutase/catalase ratio in healthy subjects (Khairova et al., 2012). Furthermore, a genetic
study showed a significant interaction between superoxide dismutase and glutathione
peroxidase haplotypes which increased risk for BD (Fullerton et al., 2010). All these
antioxidant enzymes (superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase) form
complicated relationships, and despite not being independently significant in this analysis,
they may still play an important role in the overall pathophysiology of BD.
In summary, the results of this meta-‐analysis further confirm the presence of oxidative
stress in BD patients. Compared to healthy controls, BD patients had higher levels of nitric
oxide, more DNA and RNA damage, and increased lipid peroxidation. Determining the
cause and effects of BD and its biological progression will lead to more effective treatments
and care. Furthermore, through the use of very large studies or meta-‐analyses, a biomarker
may be detected to aid in the diagnosis and treatment of BD. The large effect size and
robustness of increased lipid peroxidation in BD patients shown in this meta-‐analysis make
it a good candidate as a potential biomarker for BD. Limitations are discussed below.
4.2 HIPPOCAMPUS AND BIPOLAR DISORDER
Determining the exact brain regions affected by oxidative stress in BD and SCZ is vital to
improve treatment and outcomes. There is substantial evidence showing oxidative damage
to proteins, lipids, and DNA in the prefrontal cortex of patients with BD and SCZ. In this
study we investigated the involvement of oxidative stress in the hippocampus and found no
between-‐group differences in the oxidation of proteins or lipids. Of particular note,
51
however, we found preliminary evidence of increased global hydroxymethylation to DNA in
patients with SCZ. These results suggest that hippocampus is not a target region for
oxidative damage to proteins and lipids, however DNA modification in this region may be
important.
Microarray studies have shown many alterations in genes expression related to energy
metabolism and oxidative stress in patients with BD or SCZ, although there are differences
between the two diseases (Hakak et al., 2001, Vawter et al., 2002, Prabakaran et al., 2004,
Iwamoto et al., 2005, Sun et al., 2006, Choi et al., 2011). Alterations in the mRNA expression
of mitochondrial complex I subunits is especially relevant since complex I is a major source
of ROS. In fact, even partial inhibition of complex I leads to increased ROS in neurons
(Tretter et al., 2004, Fariss et al., 2005). Previous work from our laboratory, on the same
patient cohort from the HBTRC, found decreased protein levels of NDUFS7, a complex I
subunit, in the prefrontal cortex of patients with BD (Andreazza et al., 2010, Andreazza et
al., 2013). Although decreased mRNA expression of multiple complex I subunits has been
shown in hippocampus samples from the HBTRC (Konradi et al., 2004), our quantification
of protein levels in this region did not indicate any alterations. Additionally, results from
our laboratory on the prefrontal cortex of this patient cohort found increased protein
carbonylation in BD, increased 3-‐nitrotyrosine in BD and SCZ, and increased 4-‐
hydroxynonenal in SCZ and BD (Andreazza et al., 2013). We did not find any evidence of
protein or lipid damage in the hippocampus, however.
Since this is the first time oxidative damage to proteins and lipids were explored in the
hippocampus of patients with BD and SCZ, we looked at the literature for relevant animal
52
studies. Animal studies that link psychiatric distress to oxidative damage have shown that
the hippocampus may be less susceptible than other brain areas such as prefrontal cortex
(Lucca et al., 2009, Wang et al., 2009). One study found that although there was increased
ROS generated in the hippocampus of rats exposed to chronic mild stress, there was no
oxidative damage, which was in contrast to the cortex region (Lucca et al., 2009). In rats
with amphetamine-‐induced mania there was increased DNA damage, lipid peroxidation,
and an inhibition of mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes in the hippocampus;
however, some of these effects were prevented or reversed with mood stabilizers.
Interestingly, the therapeutic effects of the mood stabilizers lithium and valproate were
dependent on the brain region (Frey et al., 2006, Andreazza et al., 2008b, Feier et al., 2013).
These findings are not replicated in humans and it is unknown exactly how the human
hippocampus responds to oxidative stress. Additionally, oxidative and nitrosative damage
increases in neurons over time, as shown in the many studies where age correlates with
these measures (Venkateshappa et al., 2012). However, the hippocampus region is subject
to high cell turnover and is a region of high neurogenesis in humans (Eriksson et al., 1998),
therefore this damage may not accumulate as it does in other regions. A commonly
reported finding in BD and SCZ is changes in the gene expression and proteins levels of
BDNF, a mediator of hippocampal plasticity (Chen et al., 2001, Neves-‐Pereira et al., 2005,
Palomino et al., 2006, Frodl et al., 2007). There is also significant evidence that
antidepressant therapies work by increasing neurogenesis in the hippocampus (Santarelli
et al., 2003). Similarly, nitric oxide, which we determined to be increased in BD in the meta-‐
analysis, may also be involved with hippocampal neurogenesis (Zhang et al., 2001). These
factors could indicate that although there are no measurable oxidative changes to proteins
53
or lipids in hippocampus, this may be due to damage being repaired more efficiently than
in other brain regions through increased cell turnover; there remains a possibility that the
neuroplasticity in the hippocampus may mitigate oxidative damage.
It is clear from family and twin studies that genetic factors play a role in BD and SCZ (Frey
et al., 2007), however the genetic causes remain unknown. Modifications, such as
methylation or hydroxymethylation to cytosine, play a role in gene expression. 5-‐hmC is
formed by the oxidation of 5-‐mC, catalyzed by TET enzymes, and leading to demethylation
of cytosine (He et al., 2011, Ito et al., 2011, Kohli and Zhang, 2013). Very little is known
about these modifications in psychiatric disorders, however, one recent study showed
increased TET-‐1 mRNA expression and increased 5-‐hmC in the inferior parietal lobule of
psychotic patients (Dong et al., 2012). Here, we report increased 5-‐hmC in the
hippocampus of patients with SCZ, but not BD. This evidence further supports the
association of hydroxymethylation to psychosis since these features are more common in
SCZ, however future studies are necessary to evaluate the levels TET enzymes in the
hippocampus from patients with BD and SCZ.
Psychiatric illnesses, including BD and SCZ, are diagnosed based on patient reports and
observed behavior. Unlike other fields of medicine, there are currently no biological
markers for diagnosing and marking disease progression. Knowing the specific biological
alterations that occur in BD and SCZ will lead to better medications and a lower illness
burden for patients. This is especially significant considering that a very large proportion of
BD patients develop a chronic and refractory course and years lost to disability exceed
those from cancer patients (Altamura et al., 2011). Therefore, determining the molecular
54
mechanism underlying BD and SCZ, and identifying their affected brain regions, is crucial
for a more complete understanding of these psychiatric illnesses. Importantly, in this study,
we have shown that proteins and lipids in the hippocampus are not a target of oxidative
damage in BD or SCZ but DNA modifications in this region may be a contributing factor to
the pathophysiology of SCZ.
In summary, we have demonstrated that the hippocampus, unlike the prefrontal cortex
region, may not be subjected to increased oxidative stress damage in patients with BD or
SCZ. However, we found increased 5-‐hmC in the hippocampus of patients with SCZ,
suggesting alterations to the demethylation pathway. Limitations of this study are
discussed below.
4.3 LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY
The main limitations of the results from the meta-‐analysis are the high degree of
heterogeneity between studies and the small number of studies used in the analysis of
protein carbonyl content, RNA/DNA damage, and 3-‐nitrotyrosine. The sensitivity analysis
also revealed that the results of the analysis for catalase, nitric oxide, 3-‐nitrotyrosine, and
protein carbonyl content are not very robust. For catalase, the one study removed
sensitivity analysis showed that the lack of statistical significance was weak; removing the
study by Machado-‐Vieira et al. (2007) caused the negative effect size to become significant
which would indicate that BD patients have a lower activity of peripheral catalase. One
55
potential cause of this sensitivity could be the large drug-‐free population in the study by
Machado-‐Vieira et al. (2007) and this result may indicate the effect of medication use on
catalase activity. In the sensitivity analysis of nitric oxide, removal of the study by Ozcan et
al. (2004) caused a drastic increase in effect size and significance level. There are no
apparent differences in methods used since all included studies used the Greiss reaction to
measure nitric oxide however there is a lot of heterogeneity between patient samples
which is likely the main contributor to the sensitivity of this analysis. The sensitivity in the
results from 3-‐nitrotyrosine is likely due to the small number of studies and the sensitivity
in protein carbonyl content to the heterogeneity between patient populations. The
considerable between-‐study heterogeneity in this meta-‐analysis may be a reflection of the
heterogeneity in BD itself. Few papers report length of illness, age of onset, number of
mood episodes, illness phase, or BD phenotype; however, there is considerable evidence
that these are important factors in the level of oxidative stress (Andreazza et al., 2007a,
Andreazza et al., 2009, Kapczinski et al., 2011). There is also evidence that drug treatment
may partly alleviate increased oxidative stress, which is unaccounted for in this meta-‐
analysis due to few papers reporting drug status (Ozcan et al., 2004, Aliyazicioglu et al.,
2007, Frey et al., 2007, Machado-‐Vieira et al., 2007a). Laboratory methodology is also
another source of heterogeneity between studies in this meta-‐analysis. In addition, studies
were conducted in different geographical locations, which may add confounding factors
such as diet. Due to these limitations, interpretations of this meta-‐analysis must be
considered cautiously.
The use of postmortem brain samples is invaluable in psychiatric research since it allows
direct measurement of the affected tissue. There are potential confounding factors with
56
these samples, however, such as PMI, pH, and storage conditions. In general, DNA is
relatively resistant to post-‐mortem degradation, however protein nitration and oxidation
may be affected by PMI or pH (Ferrer et al., 2008). To control for these factors, we
correlated our data with PMI and pH and found no effect. Additionally, in this study, we
used whole tissue homogenates to measure protein and lipid damage, however damage
may be specific to certain cell types or fractions. A recent study in the prefrontal cortex of
this same patient cohort found differences specific to either the synaptosomal-‐ or
mitochondria-‐enriched fraction (Andreazza et al., 2013). Furthermore, there is evidence
that CA1 and CA3 pyramidal neurons in the hippocampus respond to oxidative stress very
differently. Multiple studies have found that when hippocampus cells are exposed to a
superoxide-‐generating compound, CA1 neurons are selectively destroyed while CA3
neurons mostly survive (Wilde et al., 1997, Wang and Michaelis, 2010). Nonetheless, most
studies in the literature use whole tissue. It is also important to consider the strong effect
of medications on oxidative parameters and neurogenesis in the hippocampus. Although
medication information was known and correlated to the biochemical measures with no
significance, it is important to note that our sample did not include drug-‐free patients. To
confirm that proteins and lipids in the hippocampus are not affected by oxidative stress, a
study with a larger drug-‐free population is necessary.
57
Chapter 5. Conclusions, significance, and future directions
5.1 OVERALL CONCLUSIONS FROM THIS STUDY AND SIGNIFICANCE
The principal objectives of this study were to investigate oxidative stress markers in BD
through a meta-‐analysis of published studies and quantitatively measure oxidative
biomarkers in post-‐mortem hippocampal tissue. Our hypothesis that the meta-‐analysis
would confirm the presence of increased nitric oxide and lipid peroxidation in BD has been
validated by our significant results. In addition, our analysis revealed a significant increase
of DNA/RNA damage in BD, a new finding. Our hypothesis that the hippocampus would be
a target of oxidative damage to proteins and lipids was not supported by our results,
however we did find an increase of 5-‐hmC in patients with SCZ. Although the results were
negative, it is important to determine which brain regions are affected to determine
neurological alterations in BD. Although the hippocampus has often been implicated in BD
through microarray and neuroimaging studies, this is the first study to measure oxidative
damage to proteins and lipids in this region. Overall, this study has further supported the
increased levels of peripheral oxidative stress damage in BD, especially to lipids and DNA,
and has demonstrated that the hippocampus may not be a target of oxidative alterations.
Furthermore, we have shown increased levels of 5-‐hmC in the hippocampus of patients
with SCZ, suggesting a possible alteration to the demethylation pathway.
58
5.2 FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Possible future directions of this study include:
• The quantification of 5-‐mC and 5-‐hmC in the prefrontal cortex
• Histological fractionation of the hippocampus and further examination of oxidative
stress markers
• Determining the gene-‐specific alterations of 5-‐hmC in SCZ
• Investigating oxidative stress markers in other brain regions
• Exploring lipid peroxidation as a potential biomarker in BD
Ultimately this study, together with ongoing studies in our laboratory, will guide the
development of better diagnostic and treatment tools to improve the quality of life for
patients with BD.
59
References
Abdalla DSP, Monteiro HP, Oliveira JAC, Bechara EJH (1986) Activities of superoxide-‐
dismutase and glutathione-‐peroxidase in schizophrenic and manic-‐depressive
patients. Clinical Chemistry 32:805-‐807.
Alexander AL, Lee JE, Lazar M, Field AS (2007) Diffusion tensor imaging of the brain.
Neurotherapeutics 4:316-‐329.
Aliyazicioglu R, Kural B, Colak M, Karahan SC, Ayvaz S, Deger O (2007) Treatment with
lithium, alone or in combination with olanzapine, relieves oxidative stress but
increases atherogenic lipids in bipolar disorder. Tohoku Journal Experimental
Medicine 213:79-‐87.
Altamura AC, Serati M, Albano A, Paoli RA, Glick ID, Dell'Osso B (2011) An epidemiologic
and clinical overview of medical and psychopathological comorbidities in major
psychoses. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 261:489-‐508.
Andreazza AC, Cassini C, Rosa AR, Leite MC, de Almeida LMV, Nardin P, Cunha ABN, Cereser
KM, Santin A, Gottfried C, Salvador M, Kapczinski F, Goncalves CA (2007a) Serum
S100B and antioxidant enzymes in bipolar patients. Journal of Psychiatric Research
41:523-‐529.
Andreazza AC, Frey BN, Erdtmann B, Salvador M, Rombaldi F, Santin A, Goncalves CA,
Kapczinski F (2007b) DNA damage in bipolar disorder. Psychiatry Research 153:27-‐
32.
Andreazza AC, Kapczinski F, Kauer-‐Sant'Anna M, Walz JC, Bond DJ, Goncalves CA, Young LT,
Yatham LN (2009) 3-‐Nitrotyrosine and glutathione antioxidant system in patients in
60
the early and late stages of bipolar disorder. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience
34:263-‐271.
Andreazza AC, Kauer-‐Sant'Anna M, Frey BN, Bond DJ, Kapczinski F, Young LT, Yatham LN
(2008a) Oxidative stress markers in bipolar disorder: A meta-‐analysis. Journal of
Affective Disorders 111:135-‐144.
Andreazza AC, Kauer-‐Sant'Anna M, Frey BN, Stertz L, Zanotto C, Ribeiro L, Giasson K,
Valvassori SS, Reus GZ, Salvador M, Quevedo J, Goncalves CA, Kapczinski F (2008b)
Effects of mood stabilizers on DNA damage in an animal model of mania. Journal of
Psychiatry and Neuroscience 33:516-‐524.
Andreazza AC, Shao L, Wang JF, Young LT (2010) Mitochondrial complex I activity and
oxidative damage to mitochondrial proteins in the prefrontal cortex of patients with
bipolar disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry 67:360-‐368.
Andreazza AC, Wang JF, Salmasi F, Shao L, Young LT (2013) Specific subcellular changes in
oxidative stress in prefrontal cortex from patients with bipolar disorder. Journal of
Neurochemistry 127:552-‐561.
Anglin RE, Garside SL, Tarnopolsky MA, Mazurek MF, Rosebush PI (2012) The psychiatric
manifestations of mitochondrial disorders: a case and review of the literature.
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 73:506-‐512.
Angst F, Stassen HH, Clayton PJ, Angst J (2002) Mortality of patients with mood disorders:
follow-‐up over 34-‐38 years. Journal of Affective Disorders 68:167-‐181.
Arnold LM (2003) Gender differences in bipolar disorder. Psychiatric Clinics of North
America 26:595-‐620.
61
Badner JA, Gershon ES (2002) Meta-‐analysis of whole-‐genome linkage scans of bipolar
disorder and schizophrenia. Molecular Psychiatry 7:405-‐411.
Banerjee U, Dasgupta A, Rout JK, Singh OP (2012) Effects of lithium therapy on Na+-‐K+-‐
ATPase activity and lipid peroxidation in bipolar disorder. Progress in Neuro-‐
Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry 37:56-‐61.
Barnham KJ, Masters CL, Bush AI (2004) Neurodegenerative diseases and oxidative stress.
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 3:205-‐214.
Bearden CE, Thompson PM, Dutton RA, Frey BN, Peluso MA, Nicoletti M, Dierschke N,
Hayashi KM, Klunder AD, Glahn DC, Brambilla P, Sassi RB, Mallinger AG, Soares JC
(2008) Three-‐dimensional mapping of hippocampal anatomy in unmedicated and
lithium-‐treated patients with bipolar disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology 33:1229-‐
1238.
Benes FM, Matzilevich D, Burke RE, Walsh J (2006) The expression of proapoptosis genes is
increased in bipolar disorder, but not in schizophrenia. Molecular Psychiatry
11:241-‐251.
Benes FM, Walsh J, Bhattacharyya S, Sheth A, Berretta S (2003) DNA fragmentation
decreased in schizophrenia but not bipolar disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry
60:359-‐364.
Berk M, Kapczinski F, Andreazza AC, Dean OM, Giorlando F, Maes M, Yucel M, Gama CS,
Dodd S, Dean B, Magalhaes PV, Amminger P, McGorry P, Malhi GS (2011) Pathways
underlying neuroprogression in bipolar disorder: focus on inflammation, oxidative
stress and neurotrophic factors. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 35:804-‐
817.
62
Berk M, Malhi GS, Hallam K, Gama CS, Dodd S, Andreazza AC, Frey BN, Kapczinski F (2009)
Early intervention in bipolar disorders: clinical, biochemical and neuroimaging
imperatives. Journal of Affective Disorders 114:1-‐13.
Beyer J, Kuchibhatla M, Gersing K, Krishnan KR (2005) Medical comorbidity in a bipolar
outpatient clinical population. Neuropsychopharmacology 30:401-‐404.
Bigos KL, Mattay VS, Callicott JH, Straub RE, Vakkalanka R, Kolachana B, Hyde TM, Lipska
BK, Kleinman JE, Weinberger DR (2010) Genetic variation in CACNA1C affects brain
circuitries related to mental illness. Archives of General Psychiatry 67:939-‐945.
Boldrini M, Hen R, Underwood MD, Rosoklija GB, Dwork AJ, Mann JJ, Arango V (2012)
Hippocampal angiogenesis and progenitor cell proliferation are increased with
antidepressant use in major depression. Biological Psychiatry 72:562-‐571.
Brietzke E, Stertz L, Fernandes BS, Kauer-‐Sant'Anna M, Mascarenhas M, Vargas AE, Chies JA,
Kapczinski F (2009) Comparison of cytokine levels in depressed, manic and
euthymic patients with bipolar disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders 116:214-‐
217.
Buttner N, Bhattacharyya S, Walsh J, Benes FM (2007) DNA fragmentation is increased in
non-‐GABAergic neurons in bipolar disorder but not in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia
Research 93:33-‐41.
Campbell S, Marriott M, Nahmias C, MacQueen GM (2004) Lower hippocampal volume in
patients suffering from depression: a meta-‐analysis. American Journal of Psychiatry
161:598-‐607.
Cassarino DS, Bennett JP (1999) An evaluation of the role of mitochondria in
neurodegenerative diseases: mitochondrial mutations and oxidative pathology,
63
protective nuclear responses, and cell death in neurodegeneration. Brain Research
Reviews 29:1-‐25.
Cataldo AM, McPhie DL, Lange NT, Punzell S, Elmiligy S, Ye NZ, Froimowitz MP, Hassinger
LC, Menesale EB, Sargent LW, Logan DJ, Carpenter AE, Cohen BM (2010)
Abnormalities in mitochondrial structure in cells from patients with bipolar
disorder. American Journal of Pathology 177:575-‐585.
Che Y, Wang JF, Shao L, Young T (2010) Oxidative damage to RNA but not DNA in the
hippocampus of patients with major mental illness. Journal of Psychiatry &
Neuroscience 35:296-‐302.
Chen B, Dowlatshahi D, MacQueen GM, Wang JF, Young LT (2001) Increased hippocampal
BDNF immunoreactivity in subjects treated with antidepressant medication.
Biological Psychiatry 50:260-‐265.
Chen G, Rajkowska G, Du F, Seraji-‐Bozorgzad N, Manji HK (2000) Enhancement of
hippocampal neurogenesis by lithium. Journal of Neurochemistry 75:1729-‐1734.
Chen SL, Lee SY, Chang YH, Chen SH, Chu CH, Wang TY, Chen PS, Lee IH, Yang YK, Hong JS,
Lu RB (2014) The BDNF Val66Met polymorphism and plasma brain-‐derived
neurotrophic factor levels in Han Chinese patients with bipolar disorder and
schizophrenia. Progress in Neuro-‐Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
51C:99-‐104.
Chen YW, Dilsaver SC (1996) Lifetime rates of suicide attempts among subjects with
bipolar and unipolar disorders relative to subjects with other Axis I disorders.
Biological Psychiatry 39:896-‐899.
64
Choi KH, Higgs BW, Wendland JR, Song J, McMahon FJ, Webster MJ (2011) Gene expression
and genetic variation data implicate PCLO in bipolar disorder. Biological Psychiatry
69:353-‐359.
Cunha ABM, Frey BN, Andreazza AC, Goi JlD, Rosa AR, Gonçalves CA, Santin A, Kapczinski
F (2006) Serum brain-‐derived neurotrophic factor is decreased in bipolar disorder
during depressive and manic episodes. Neuroscience Letters 398:215-‐219.
D'Sa C, Duman RS (2002) Antidepressants and neuroplasticity. Bipolar Disorders 4:183-‐
194.
Dalle-‐Donne I, Rossi R, Colombo R, Giustarini D, Milzani A (2006) Biomarkers of oxidative
damage in human disease. Clinical Chemistry 52:601-‐623.
Dong E, Gavin DP, Chen Y, Davis J (2012) Upregulation of TET1 and downregulation of
APOBEC3A and APOBEC3C in the parietal cortex of psychotic patients. Translational
Psychiatry 2:e159.
Dubovsky SL, Christiano J, Daniell LC, Franks RD, Murphy J, Adler L, Baker N, Harris A
(1989) Increased platelet intracellular calcium concentration in patients with
bipolar affective disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry 46:632-‐638.
Duffy A, Lewitzka U, Doucette S, Andreazza A, Grof P (2012) Biological indicators of illness
risk in offspring of bipolar parents: targeting the hypothalamic-‐pituitary-‐adrenal
axis and immune system. Early Intervention in Psychiatry 6:128-‐137.
Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-‐analysis detected by a
simple, graphical test. BMJ 315:629-‐634.
Ellison-‐Wright I, Bullmore E (2009) Meta-‐analysis of diffusion tensor imaging studies in
schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research 108:3-‐10.
65
Emsell L, McDonald C (2009) The structural neuroimaging of bipolar disorder.
International Reviews of Psychiatry 21:297-‐313.
Eriksson PS, Perfilieva E, Bjork-‐Eriksson T, Alborn AM, Nordborg C, Peterson DA, Gage FH
(1998) Neurogenesis in the adult human hippocampus. Nature Medicine 4:1313-‐
1317.
Fagiolini A, Goracci A (2009) The effects of undertreated chronic medical illnesses in
patients with severe mental disorders. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 70 Suppl 3:22-‐
29.
Fariss MW, Chan CB, Patel M, Van Houten B, Orrenius S (2005) Defining mitochondrial
targets to combat the pleiotropic effects of toxic oxidative stress. Molecular
Interventions 5:94-‐111.
Feier G, Valvassori SS, Varela RB, Resende WR, Bavaresco DV, Morais MO, Scaini G,
Andersen ML, Streck EL, Quevedo J (2013) Lithium and valproate modulate energy
metabolism in an animal model of mania induced by methamphetamine.
Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior 103:589-‐596.
Fernandes BS, Gama CS, Cereser KM, Yatham LN, Fries GR, Colpo G, Lucena Dd, Kunz M,
Gomes FA, Kapczinski F (2011) Brain-‐derived neurotrophic factor as a state-‐marker
of mood episodes in bipolar disorders: A systematic review and meta-‐regression
analysis. Journal of Psychiatric Research 45:995-‐1004.
Ferrer I, Martinez A, Boluda S, Parchi P, Barrachina M (2008) Brain banks: benefits,
limitations and cautions concerning the use of post-‐mortem brain tissue for
molecular studies. Cell Tissue Bank 9:181-‐194.
66
Frey BN, Andreazza AC, Houenou J, Jamain Sp, Goldstein BI, Frye MA, Leboyer M, Berk M,
Malhi GS, Lopez-‐Jaramillo C, Taylor VH, Dodd S, Frangou S, Hall GB, Fernandes BS,
Kauer-‐Sant‚ÄôAnna M, Yatham LN, Kapczinski F, Young LT (2013) Biomarkers in
bipolar disorder: A positional paper from the International Society for Bipolar
Disorders Biomarkers Task Force. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
47:321-‐332.
Frey BN, Andreazza AC, Kunz M, Gomes FA, Quevedo J, Salvador M, Goncalves CA,
Kapczinski F (2007) Increased oxidative stress and DNA damage in bipolar disorder:
a twin-‐case report. Progress in Neuro-‐Psychopharmacology and Biological
Psychiatry 31:283-‐285.
Frey BN, Valvassori SS, Reus GZ, Martins MR, Petronilho FC, Bardini K, Dal-‐Pizzol F,
Kapczinski F, Quevedo J (2006) Effects of lithium and valproate on amphetamine-‐
induced oxidative stress generation in an animal model of mania. Journal of
Psychiatry and Neuroscience 31:326-‐332.
Frodl T, Schuele C, Schmitt G, Born C, Baghai T, Zill P, Bottlender R, Rupprecht R, Bondy B,
Reiser M, Moeller HJ, Meisenzahl EM (2007) Association of the brain-‐derived
neurotrophic factor Val66Met polymorphism with reduced hippocampal volumes in
major depression. Archives of General Psychiatry 64:410-‐416.
Fullerton JM, Tiwari Y, Agahi G, Heath A, Berk M, Mitchell PB, Schofield PR (2010) Assessing
oxidative pathway genes as risk factors for bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disorders
12:550-‐556.
67
Fusar-‐Poli P, Howes O, Bechdolf A, Borgwardt S (2012) Mapping vulnerability to bipolar
disorder: a systematic review and meta-‐analysis of neuroimaging studies. Journal of
Psychiatry and Neuroscience 37:170-‐184.
Gawryluk JW, Wang JF, Andreazza AC, Shao L, Young LT (2011) Decreased levels of
glutathione, the major brain antioxidant, in post-‐mortem prefrontal cortex from
patients with psychiatric disorders. The International Journal of
Neuropsychopharmacology 14:123-‐130.
Gergerlioglu HS, Savas HA, Bulbul F, Selek S, Uz E, Yumru M (2007) Changes in nitric oxide
level and superoxide dismutase activity during antimanic treatment. Progress in
Neuro-‐Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry 31:697-‐702.
Gigante AD, Andreazza AC, Lafer B, Yatham LN, Beasley CL, Young LT (2011a) Decreased
mRNA expression of uncoupling protein 2, a mitochondrial proton transporter, in
post-‐mortem prefrontal cortex from patients with bipolar disorder and
schizophrenia. Neuroscience Letters 505:47-‐51.
Gigante AD, Young LT, Yatham LN, Andreazza AC, Nery FG, Grinberg LT, Heinsen H, Lafer B
(2011b) Morphometric post-‐mortem studies in bipolar disorder: possible
association with oxidative stress and apoptosis. International Journal of
Neuropsychopharmacology 14:1075-‐1089.
Giustarini D, Dalle-‐Donne I, Tsikas D, Rossi R (2009) Oxidative stress and human diseases:
Origin, link, measurement, mechanisms, and biomarkers. Critical Reviews in Clinical
Laboratory Sciences 46:241-‐281.
68
Goetzel RZ, Hawkins K, Ozminkowski RJ, Wang S (2003) The health and productivity cost
burden of the "top 10" physical and mental health conditions affecting six large U.S.
employers in 1999. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 45:5-‐14.
Goldstein BI, Kemp DE, Soczynska JK, McIntyre RS (2009) Inflammation and the
phenomenology, pathophysiology, comorbidity, and treatment of bipolar disorder: A
systematic review of the literature. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 70:1078-‐1090.
Grayson DR, Guidotti A (2013) The Dynamics of DNA Methylation in Schizophrenia and
Related Psychiatric Disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology 38:138-‐166.
Group PGCBDW (2011) Large-‐scale genome-‐wide association analysis of bipolar disorder
identifies a new susceptibility locus near ODZ4. Nature Genetics 43:977-‐983.
Gu X, Sun J, Li S, Wu X, Li L (2013) Oxidative stress induces DNA demethylation and histone
acetylation in SH-‐SY5Y cells: potential epigenetic mechanisms in gene transcription
in Abeta production. Neurobiology of Aging 34:1069-‐1079.
Gubert C, Stertz L, Pfaffenseller B, Panizzutti BS, Rezin GT, Massuda R, Streck EL, Gama CS,
Kapczinski F, Kunz M (2013) Mitochondrial activity and oxidative stress markers in
peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with bipolar disorder, schizophrenia,
and healthy subjects. Journal of Psychiatric Research 47:1396-‐1402.
Guo JU, Su Y, Zhong C, Ming GL, Song H (2011) Hydroxylation of 5-‐methylcytosine by TET1
promotes active DNA demethylation in the adult brain. Cell 145:423-‐434.
Hafeman DM, Chang KD, Garrett AS, Sanders EM, Phillips ML (2012) Effects of medication
on neuroimaging findings in bipolar disorder: an updated review. Bipolar Disorders
14:375-‐410.
69
Hajek T, Bauer M, Simhandl C, Rybakowski J, O'Donovan C, Pfennig A, Konig B, Suwalska A,
Yucel K, Uher R, Young LT, Macqueen G, Alda M (2014) Neuroprotective effect of
lithium on hippocampal volumes in bipolar disorder independent of long-‐term
treatment response. Psychological Medicine 44:507-‐517.
Hakak Y, Walker JR, Li C, Wong WH, Davis KL, Buxbaum JD, Haroutunian V, Fienberg AA
(2001) Genome-‐wide expression analysis reveals dysregulation of myelination-‐
related genes in chronic schizophrenia. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences of the United States of America 98:4746-‐4751.
He YF, Li BZ, Li Z, Liu P, Wang Y, Tang Q, Ding J, Jia Y, Chen Z, Li L, Sun Y, Li X, Dai Q, Song
CX, Zhang K, He C, Xu GL (2011) Tet-‐mediated formation of 5-‐carboxylcytosine and
its excision by TDG in mammalian DNA. Science 333:1303-‐1307.
Hough C, Lu SJ, Davis CL, Chuang DM, Post RM (1999) Elevated basal and thapsigargin-‐
stimulated intracellular calcium of platelets and lymphocytes from bipolar affective
disorder patients measured by a fluorometric microassay. Biological Psychiatry
46:247-‐255.
Ito S, Shen L, Dai Q, Wu SC, Collins LB, Swenberg JA, He C, Zhang Y (2011) Tet proteins can
convert 5-‐methylcytosine to 5-‐formylcytosine and 5-‐carboxylcytosine. Science
333:1300-‐1303.
Iwamoto K, Bundo M, Kato T (2005) Altered expression of mitochondria-‐related genes in
postmortem brains of patients with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia, as revealed
by large-‐scale DNA microarray analysis. Human Molecular Genetics 14:241-‐253.
70
Jogia J, Ruberto G, Lelli-‐Chiesa G, Vassos E, Maieru M, Tatarelli R, Girardi P, Collier D,
Frangou S (2011) The impact of the CACNA1C gene polymorphism on frontolimbic
function in bipolar disorder. Molecular Psychiatry 16:1070-‐1071.
Kapczinski F, Dal-‐Pizzol F, Teixeira AL, Magalhaes PV, Kauer-‐Sant'Anna M, Klamt F, Moreira
JC, de Bittencourt Pasquali MA, Fries GR, Quevedo J, Gama CS, Post R (2011)
Peripheral biomarkers and illness activity in bipolar disorder. Journal of Psychiatric
Research 45:156-‐161.
Kapczinski F, Frey BN, Andreazza AC, Kauer-‐Sant'Anna M, Cunha AB, Post RM (2008)
Increased oxidative stress as a mechanism for decreased BDNF levels in acute manic
episodes. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria 30:243-‐245.
Kato T (2008) Role of mitochondrial DNA in calcium signaling abnormality in bipolar
disorder. Cell Calcium 44:92-‐102.
Kauer-‐Sant'Anna M, Kapczinski F, Andreazza AC, Bond DJ, Lam RW, Young LT, Yatham LN
(2009) Brain-‐derived neurotrophic factor and inflammatory markers in patients
with early-‐ vs. late-‐stage bipolar disorder. International Journal of
Neuropsychopharmacology 12:447-‐458.
Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Merikangas KR, Walters EE (2005) Lifetime
prevalence and age-‐of-‐onset distributions of DSM-‐IV disorders in the National
Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry 62:593-‐602.
Khairova R, Pawar R, Salvadore G, Juruena MF, de Sousa RT, Soeiro-‐de-‐Souza MG, Salvador
M, Zarate CA, Gattaz WF, Machado-‐Vieira R (2012) Effects of lithium on oxidative
stress parameters in healthy subjects. Molecular Medicine Reports 5:680-‐682.
71
Kim HJ, Soh Y, Jang JH, Lee JS, Oh YJ, Surh YJ (2001) Differential cell death induced by
salsolinol with and without copper: possible role of reactive oxygen species.
Molecular Pharmacology 60:440-‐449.
Kim HW, Rapoport SI, Rao JS (2010) Altered expression of apoptotic factors and synaptic
markers in postmortem brain from bipolar disorder patients. Neurobiology of
Disease 37:596-‐603.
Kim YK, Jung HG, Myint AM, Kim H, Park SH (2007) Imbalance between pro-‐inflammatory
and anti-‐inflammatory cytokines in bipolar disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders
104:91-‐95.
Klug M, Schmidhofer S, Gebhard C, Andreesen R, Rehli M (2013) 5-‐Hydroxymethylcytosine
is an essential intermediate of active DNA demethylation processes in primary
human monocytes. Genome Biology 14:R46.
Ko M, Huang Y, Jankowska AM, Pape UJ, Tahiliani M, Bandukwala HS, An J, Lamperti ED,
Koh KP, Ganetzky R, Liu XS, Aravind L, Agarwal S, Maciejewski JP, Rao A (2010)
Impaired hydroxylation of 5-‐methylcytosine in myeloid cancers with mutant TET2.
Nature 468:839-‐843.
Kohli RM, Zhang Y (2013) TET enzymes, TDG and the dynamics of DNA demethylation.
Nature 502:472-‐479.
Konradi C, Eaton M, MacDonald ML, Walsh J, Benes FM, Heckers S (2004) Molecular
evidence for mitochondrial dysfunction in bipolar disorder. Archives of General
Psychiatry 61:300-‐308.
Koo MS, Levitt JJ, Salisbury DF, Nakamura M, Shenton ME, McCarley RW (2008) A cross-‐
sectional and longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study of cingulate gyrus gray
72
matter volume abnormalities in first-‐episode schizophrenia and first-‐episode
affective psychosis. Archives of General Psychiatry 65:746-‐760.
Kuloglu M, Ustundag B, Atmaca M, Canatan H, Tezcan AE, Cinkilinc N (2002) Lipid
peroxidation and antioxidant enzyme levels in patients with schizophrenia and
bipolar disorder. Cell Biochemistry and Function 20:171-‐175.
Kunz M, Gama CS, Andreazza AC, Salvador M, Cereser KM, Gomes FA, Belmonte-‐de-‐Abreu
PS, Berk M, Kapczinski F (2008) Elevated serum superoxide dismutase and
thiobarbituric acid reactive substances in different phases of bipolar disorder and in
schizophrenia. Progress in Neuro-‐Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
32:1677-‐1681.
Kupfer DJ (2005) The increasing medical burden in bipolar disorder. Journal of the
American Medical Association 293:2528-‐2530.
Kuratomi G, Iwamoto K, Bundo M, Kusumi I, Kato N, Iwata N, Ozaki N, Kato T (2008)
Aberrant DNA methylation associated with bipolar disorder identified from
discordant monozygotic twins. Molecular Psychiatry 13:429-‐441.
Lopez-‐Armada MJ, Riveiro-‐Naveira RR, Vaamonde-‐Garcia C, Valcarcel-‐Ares MN (2013)
Mitochondrial dysfunction and the inflammatory response. Mitochondrion 13:106-‐
118.
Lowthert L, Leffert J, Lin A, Umlauf S, Maloney K, Muralidharan A, Lorberg B, Mane S, Zhao
H, Sinha R, Bhagwagar Z, Beech R (2012) Increased ratio of anti-‐apoptotic to pro-‐
apoptotic Bcl2 gene-‐family members in lithium-‐responders one month after
treatment initiation. Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders 2:15.
73
Lucca G, Comim CM, Valvassori SS, Reus GZ, Vuolo F, Petronilho F, Gavioli EC, Dal-‐Pizzol F,
Quevedo J (2009) Increased oxidative stress in submitochondrial particles into the
brain of rats submitted to the chronic mild stress paradigm. Journal of Psychiatric
Research 43:864-‐869.
Machado-‐Vieira R, Andreazza AC, Viale CI, Zanatto V, Cereser V, Vargas RD, Kapczinski F,
Portela LV, Souza DO, Salvador M, Gentil V (2007a) Oxidative stress parameters in
unmedicated and treated bipolar subjects during initial manic episode: A possible
role for lithium antioxidant effects. Neuroscience Letters 421:33-‐36.
Machado-‐Vieira R, Dietrich MO, Leke R, Cereser VH, Zanatto V, Kapczinski F, Souza DO,
Portela LV, Gentil V (2007b) Decreased Plasma Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor
Levels in Unmedicated Bipolar Patients During Manic Episode. Biological Psychiatry
61:142-‐144.
Magalhaes PV, Jansen K, Pinheiro RT, Colpo GD, da Motta LL, Klamt F, da Silva RA,
Kapczinski F (2012) Peripheral oxidative damage in early-‐stage mood disorders: a
nested population-‐based case-‐control study. International Journal of
Neuropsychopharmacology 15:1043-‐1050.
Malhi GS, Adams D, Berk M (2009) Medicating mood with maintenance in mind: bipolar
depression pharmacotherapy. Bipolar Disorders 11 Suppl 2:55-‐76.
Manji HK, Quiroz JA, Sporn J, Payne JL, Denicoff K, A. Gray N, Zarate Jr CA, Charney DS
(2003) Enhancing neuronal plasticity and cellular resilience to develop novel,
improved therapeutics for Difficult-‐to-‐Treat depression. Biological Psychiatry
53:707-‐742.
74
Markham A, Cameron I, Bains R, Franklin P, Kiss JP, Schwendimann L, Gressens P, Spedding
M (2012) Brain-‐derived neurotrophic factor-‐mediated effects on mitochondrial
respiratory coupling and neuroprotection share the same molecular signalling
pathways. European Journal of Neuroscience 35:366-‐374.
Matarese F, Carrillo-‐de Santa Pau E, Stunnenberg HG (2011) 5-‐Hydroxymethylcytosine: a
new kid on the epigenetic block? Molecular Systems Biology 7:562.
McDonald C, Marshall N, Sham PC, Bullmore ET, Schulze K, Chapple B, Bramon E, Filbey F,
Quraishi S, Walshe M, Murray RM (2006) Regional brain morphometry in patients
with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder and their unaffected relatives. American
Journal of Psychiatry 163:478-‐487.
McElroy SL, Altshuler LL, Suppes T, Keck PE, Jr., Frye MA, Denicoff KD, Nolen WA, Kupka
RW, Leverich GS, Rochussen JR, Rush AJ, Post RM (2001) Axis I psychiatric
comorbidity and its relationship to historical illness variables in 288 patients with
bipolar disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry 158:420-‐426.
Merikangas KR, Akiskal HS, Angst J, Greenberg PE, Hirschfeld RM, Petukhova M, Kessler RC
(2007) Lifetime and 12-‐month prevalence of bipolar spectrum disorder in the
National Comorbidity Survey replication. Archives of General Psychiatry 64:543-‐
552.
Miklowitz DJ, Schneck CD, Singh MK, Taylor DO, George EL, Cosgrove VE, Howe ME,
Dickinson LM, Garber J, Chang KKD (2013) Early Intervention for Symptomatic
Youth at Risk for Bipolar Disorder: A Randomized Trial of Family-‐Focused Therapy.
Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 52:121-‐131.
75
Mill J, Tang T, Kaminsky Z, Khare T, Yazdanpanah S, Bouchard L, Jia P, Assadzadeh A,
Flanagan J, Schumacher A, Wang SC, Petronis A (2008) Epigenomic Profiling Reveals
DNA-‐Methylation Changes Associated with Major Psychosis. American Journal of
Human Genetics 82:696-‐711.
Miller S, Hallmayer J, Wang PW, Hill SJ, Johnson SL, Ketter TA (2013) Brain-‐derived
neurotrophic factor val66met genotype and early life stress effects upon bipolar
course. Journal of Psychiatric Research 47:252-‐258.
Min HJ, Cho HS, Kim SJ, Seok JH, Lee E, Jon DI (2012) Association of the Brain-‐derived
Neurotrophic Factor Gene and Clinical Features of Bipolar Disorder in Korea.
Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience 10:163-‐167.
Moorhead TW, McKirdy J, Sussmann JE, Hall J, Lawrie SM, Johnstone EC, McIntosh AM
(2007) Progressive gray matter loss in patients with bipolar disorder. Biological
Psychiatry 62:894-‐900.
Murphy MP (2009) How mitochondria produce reactive oxygen species. Biochemical
Journal 417:1-‐13.
Murray CJL, Lopez AD (1996) The Global Burden of Disease: a comprehensive assessment
of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and
projected to 2020. Cambridge, MA: Harvard School of Public Health (Global Burden
of Disease and Injury Series, vol. I).
Mustak MS, Hegde ML, Dinesh A, Britton GB, Berrocal R, Subba Rao K, Shamasundar NM,
Rao KS, Sathyanarayana Rao TS (2010) Evidence of altered DNA integrity in the
brain regions of suicidal victims of Bipolar Depression. Indian Journal of Psychiatry
52:220-‐228.
76
Neves-‐Pereira M, Cheung J, Pasdar A, Zhang F, Breen G, Yates P, Sinclair M, Crombie C,
Walker N, St Clair DM (2005) BDNF gene is a risk factor for schizophrenia in a
Scottish population. Molecular Psychiatry 10:208-‐212.
Ng F, Berk M, Dean O, Bush AI (2008) Oxidative stress in psychiatric disorders: evidence
base and therapeutic implications. International Journal of
Neuropsychopharmacology 11:851-‐876.
Nortje G, Stein DJ, Radua J, Mataix-‐Cols D, Horn N (2013) Systematic review and voxel-‐
based meta-‐analysis of diffusion tensor imaging studies in bipolar disorder. Journal
of Affective Disorders 150:192-‐200.
O'Brien SM, Scully P, Scott LV, Dinan TG (2006) Cytokine profiles in bipolar affective
disorder: Focus on acutely ill patients. Journal of Affective Disorders 90:263-‐267.
Ozcan ME, Gulec M, Ozerol E, Polat R, Akyol O (2004) Antioxidant enzyme activities and
oxidative stress in affective disorders. International Clinical Psychopharmacology
19:89-‐95.
Palomino A, Vallejo-‐Illarramendi A, Gonzalez-‐Pinto A, Aldama A, Gonzalez-‐Gomez C,
Mosquera F, Gonzalez-‐Garcia G, Matute C (2006) Decreased levels of plasma BDNF
in first-‐episode schizophrenia and bipolar disorder patients. Schizophrenia
Research 86:321-‐322.
Pariante CM, Miller AH (2001) Glucocorticoid receptors in major depression: relevance to
pathophysiology and treatment. Biological Psychiatry 49:391-‐404.
Perry A, Tarrier N, Morriss R, McCarthy E, Limb K (1999) Randomised controlled trial of
efficacy of teaching patients with bipolar disorder to identify early symptoms of
relapse and obtain treatment. BMJ 318:149-‐153.
77
Petronis A (2010) Epigenetics as a unifying principle in the aetiology of complex traits and
diseases. Nature 465:721-‐727.
Phillips ML, Kupfer DJ (2013) Bipolar disorder diagnosis: challenges and future directions.
Lancet 381:1663-‐1671.
Prabakaran S, Swatton JE, Ryan MM, Huffaker SJ, Huang JT, Griffin JL, Wayland M, Freeman
T, Dudbridge F, Lilley KS, Karp NA, Hester S, Tkachev D, Mimmack ML, Yolken RH,
Webster MJ, Torrey EF, Bahn S (2004) Mitochondrial dysfunction in schizophrenia:
evidence for compromised brain metabolism and oxidative stress. Molecular
Psychiatry 9:684-‐697, 643.
Quiroz JA, Gray NA, Kato T, Manji HK (2008) Mitochondrially mediated plasticity in the
pathophysiology and treatment of bipolar disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology
33:2551-‐2565.
Raffa M, Barhoumi S, Atig F, Fendri C, Kerkeni A, Mechri A (2012) Reduced antioxidant
defense systems in schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder. Progress in Neuro-‐
Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry 39:371-‐375.
Rao JS, Harry GJ, Rapoport SI, Kim HW (2010) Increased excitotoxicity and
neuroinflammatory markers in postmortem frontal cortex from bipolar disorder
patients. Molecular Psychiatry 15:384-‐392.
Rezin GT, Amboni G, Zugno AI, Quevedo J, Streck EL (2009) Mitochondrial Dysfunction and
Psychiatric Disorders. Neurochemical Research 34:1021-‐1029.
Santarelli L, Saxe M, Gross C, Surget A, Battaglia F, Dulawa S, Weisstaub N, Lee J, Duman R,
Arancio O, Belzung C, Hen R (2003) Requirement of hippocampal neurogenesis for
the behavioral effects of antidepressants. Science 301:805-‐809.
78
Savas HA, Gergerlioglu HS, Armutcu F, Herken H, Yilmaz HR, Kocoglu E, Selek S, Tutkun H,
Zoroglu SS, Akyol O (2006) Elevated serum nitric oxide and superoxide dismutase in
euthymic bipolar patients: Impact of past episodes. World Journal of Biological
Psychiatry 7:51-‐55.
Savas HA, Herken H, Yurekli M, Uz E, Tutkun H, Zoroglu SS, Ozen ME, Cengiz B, Akyol O
(2002) Possible role of nitric oxide and adrenomedullin in bipolar affective disorder.
Neuropsychobiology 45:57-‐61.
Schmidt HD, Duman RS (2007) The role of neurotrophic factors in adult hippocampal
neurogenesis, antidepressant treatments and animal models of depressive-‐like
behavior. Behavioural Pharmacology 18:391-‐418.
Scola G, Kim HK, Young LT, Andreazza AC (2013) A Fresh Look at Complex I in Microarray
Data: Clues to Understanding Disease-‐Specific Mitochondrial Alterations in Bipolar
Disorder. Biological Psychiatry 73:e4-‐e5.
Scott LJ, Muglia P, Kong XQ, Guan W, Flickinger M, Upmanyu R, Tozzi F, Li JZ, Burmeister M,
Absher D, Thompson RC, Francks C, Meng F, Antoniades A, Southwick AM,
Schatzberg AF, Bunney WE, Barchas JD, Jones EG, Day R, Matthews K, McGuffin P,
Strauss JS, Kennedy JL, Middleton L, Roses AD, Watson SJ, Vincent JB, Myers RM,
Farmer AE, Akil H, Burns DK, Boehnke M (2009) Genome-‐wide association and
meta-‐analysis of bipolar disorder in individuals of European ancestry. Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences 106:7501-‐7506.
Selek S, Savas HA, Gergerlioglu HS, Bulbul F, Uz E, Yumru M (2008) The course of nitric
oxide and superoxide dismutase during treatment of bipolar depressive episode.
Journal of Affective Disorders 107:89-‐94.
79
Shan X, Tashiro H, Lin CL (2003) The identification and characterization of oxidized RNAs
in Alzheimer's disease. The Journal of Neuroscience 23:4913-‐4921.
Simon GE (2003) Social and economic burden of mood disorders. Biological Psychiatry
54:208-‐215.
Smith AL (1967) Preparation, properties and conditions for assay of mitochondria:
slaughterhouse material, small scale. Methods in Enzymology 10:81-‐86.
Smoller JW, Finn CT (2003) Family, twin, and adoption studies of bipolar disorder.
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C Seminars in Medical Genetics 123C:48-‐
58.
Soeiro-‐de-‐Souza MG, Andreazza AC, Carvalho AF, Machado-‐Vieira R, Young LT, Moreno RA
(2013) Number of manic episodes is associated with elevated DNA oxidation in
bipolar I disorder. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 16:1505-‐
1512.
Son Y, Yang M, Kim JS, Kim J, Kim SH, Kim JC, Shin T, Wang H, Jo SK, Jung U, Moon C (2014)
Hippocampal dysfunction during the chronic phase following a single exposure to
cranial irradiation. Experimental Neurology 254:134-‐144.
Sun X, Wang JF, Tseng M, Young LT (2006) Downregulation in components of the
mitochondrial electron transport chain in the postmortem frontal cortex of subjects
with bipolar disorder. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience 31:189-‐196.
Swayze VW, 2nd, Andreasen NC, Alliger RJ, Ehrhardt JC, Yuh WT (1990) Structural brain
abnormalities in bipolar affective disorder. Ventricular enlargement and focal signal
hyperintensities. Archives of General Psychiatry 47:1054-‐1059.
80
Tan CH, Javors MA, Seleshi E, Lowrimore PA, Bowden CL (1990) Effects of lithium on
platelet ionic intracellular calcium concentration in patients with bipolar (manic-‐
depressive) disorder and healthy controls. Life Sciences 46:1175-‐1180.
Thompson PM, Stein JL, Medland SE, Hibar DP, Vasquez AA, Renteria ME, Toro R, Jahanshad
N, Schumann G, Franke B, Wright MJ, Martin NG, Agartz I, Alda M, Alhusaini S,
Almasy L, Almeida J, Alpert K, Andreasen NC, Andreassen OA, Apostolova LG, Appel
K, Armstrong NJ, Aribisala B, Bastin ME, Bauer M, Bearden CE, Bergmann O, Binder
EB, Blangero J, Bockholt HJ, Boen E, Bois C, Boomsma DI, Booth T, Bowman IJ,
Bralten J, Brouwer RM, Brunner HG, Brohawn DG, Buckner RL, Buitelaar J, Bulayeva
K, Bustillo JR, Calhoun VD, Cannon DM, Cantor RM, Carless MA, Caseras X, Cavalleri
GL, Chakravarty MM, Chang KD, Ching CR, Christoforou A, Cichon S, Clark VP, Conrod
P, Coppola G, Crespo-‐Facorro B, Curran JE, Czisch M, Deary IJ, de Geus EJ, den Braber
A, Delvecchio G, Depondt C, de Haan L, de Zubicaray GI, Dima D, Dimitrova R,
Djurovic S, Dong H, Donohoe G, Duggirala R, Dyer TD, Ehrlich S, Ekman CJ,
Elvsashagen T, Emsell L, Erk S, Espeseth T, Fagerness J, Fears S, Fedko I, Fernandez
G, Fisher SE, Foroud T, Fox PT, Francks C, Frangou S, Frey EM, Frodl T, Frouin V,
Garavan H, Giddaluru S, Glahn DC, Godlewska B, Goldstein RZ, Gollub RL, Grabe HJ,
Grimm O, Gruber O, Guadalupe T, Gur RE, Gur RC, Goring HH, Hagenaars S, Hajek T,
Hall GB, Hall J, Hardy J, Hartman CA, Hass J, Hatton SN, Haukvik UK, Hegenscheid K,
Heinz A, Hickie IB, Ho BC, Hoehn D, Hoekstra PJ, Hollinshead M, Holmes AJ, Homuth
G, Hoogman M, Hong LE, Hosten N, Hottenga JJ, Hulshoff Pol HE, Hwang KS, Jack CR,
Jr., Jenkinson M, Johnston C, Jonsson EG, Kahn RS, Kasperaviciute D, Kelly S, Kim S,
Kochunov P, Koenders L, Kramer B, Kwok JB, Lagopoulos J, Laje G, Landen M,
81
Landman BA, Lauriello J, Lawrie SM, Lee PH, Le Hellard S, Lemaitre H, Leonardo CD,
Li CS, Liberg B, Liewald DC, Liu X, Lopez LM, Loth E, Lourdusamy A, Luciano M,
Macciardi F, Machielsen MW, Macqueen GM, Malt UF, Mandl R, Manoach DS,
Martinot JL, Matarin M, Mather KA, Mattheisen M, Mattingsdal M, Meyer-‐Lindenberg
A, McDonald C, McIntosh AM, McMahon FJ, McMahon KL, Meisenzahl E, Melle I,
Milaneschi Y, Mohnke S, Montgomery GW, Morris DW, Moses EK, Mueller BA, Munoz
Maniega S, Muhleisen TW, Muller-‐Myhsok B, Mwangi B, Nauck M, Nho K, Nichols TE,
Nilsson LG, Nugent AC, Nyberg L, Olvera RL, Oosterlaan J, Ophoff RA, Pandolfo M,
Papalampropoulou-‐Tsiridou M, Papmeyer M, Paus T, Pausova Z, Pearlson GD,
Penninx BW, Peterson CP, Pfennig A, Phillips M, Pike GB, Poline JB, Potkin SG, Putz B,
Ramasamy A, Rasmussen J, Rietschel M, Rijpkema M, Risacher SL, Roffman JL, Roiz-‐
Santianez R, Romanczuk-‐Seiferth N, Rose EJ, Royle NA, Rujescu D, Ryten M, Sachdev
PS, Salami A, Satterthwaite TD, Savitz J, Saykin AJ, Scanlon C, Schmaal L, Schnack HG,
Schork AJ, Schulz SC, Schur R, Seidman L, Shen L, Shoemaker JM, Simmons A,
Sisodiya SM, Smith C, Smoller JW, Soares JC, Sponheim SR, Sprooten E, Starr JM,
Steen VM, Strakowski S, Strike L, Sussmann J, Samann PG, Teumer A, Toga AW,
Tordesillas-‐Gutierrez D, Trabzuni D, Trost S, Turner J, Van den Heuvel M, van der
Wee NJ, van Eijk K, van Erp TG, van Haren NE, van 't Ent D, van Tol MJ, Valdes
Hernandez MC, Veltman DJ, Versace A, Volzke H, Walker R, Walter H, Wang L,
Wardlaw JM, Weale ME, Weiner MW, Wen W, Westlye LT, Whalley HC, Whelan CD,
White T, Winkler AM, Wittfeld K, Woldehawariat G, Wolf C, Zilles D, Zwiers MP,
Thalamuthu A, Schofield PR, Freimer NB, Lawrence NS, Drevets W (2014) The
82
ENIGMA Consortium: large-‐scale collaborative analyses of neuroimaging and
genetic data. Brain Imaging and Behavior ePub ahead of print.
Tretter L, Sipos I, Adam-‐Vizi V (2004) Initiation of neuronal damage by complex I
deficiency and oxidative stress in Parkinson's disease. Neurochemical Research
29:569-‐577.
Uranova N, Orlovskaya D, Vikhreva O, Zimina I, Kolomeets N, Vostrikov V, Rachmanova V
(2001) Electron microscopy of oligodendroglia in severe mental illness. Brain
Research Bulletin 55:597-‐610.
Vaamonde-‐Garcia C, Riveiro-‐Naveira RR, Valcarcel-‐Ares MN, Hermida-‐Carballo L, Blanco FJ,
Lopez-‐Armada MJ (2012) Mitochondrial dysfunction increases inflammatory
responsiveness to cytokines in normal human chondrocytes. Arthritis and
Rheumatism 64:2927-‐2936.
Vawter MP, Crook JM, Hyde TM, Kleinman JE, Weinberger DR, Becker KG, Freed WJ (2002)
Microarray analysis of gene expression in the prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia: a
preliminary study. Schizophrenia Research 58:11-‐20.
Vederine F, Wessa M, Leboyer M, Houenou J (2011) A meta-‐analysis of whole-‐brain
diffusion tensor imaging studies in bipolar disorder. Progress in Neuro-‐
Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry 35:1820-‐1826.
Venkateshappa C, Harish G, Mahadevan A, Srinivas Bharath MM, Shankar SK (2012)
Elevated oxidative stress and decreased antioxidant function in the human
hippocampus and frontal cortex with increasing age: implications for
neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease. Neurochemical Research 37:1601-‐1614.
83
Versace A, Andreazza AC, Young LT, Fournier JC, Almeida JR, Stiffler RS, Lockovich JC, Aslam
HA, Pollock MH, Park H, Nimgaonkar VL, Kupfer DJ, Phillips ML (2014) Elevated
serum measures of lipid peroxidation and abnormal prefrontal white matter in
euthymic bipolar adults: toward peripheral biomarkers of bipolar disorder.
Molecular Psychiatry 19:200-‐208.
Videbech P, Ravnkilde B (2004) Hippocampal volume and depression: a meta-‐analysis of
MRI studies. American Journal of Psychiatry 161:1957-‐1966.
Wang JF, Shao L, Sun X, Young LT (2009) Increased oxidative stress in the anterior
cingulate cortex of subjects with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Bipolar
Disorders 11:523-‐529.
Wang XK, Michaelis EK (2010) Selective neuronal vulnerability to oxidative stress in the
brain. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 2:12.
Watson S, Gallagher P, Ritchie JC, Ferrier IN, Young AH (2004) Hypothalamic-‐pituitary-‐
adrenal axis function in patients with bipolar disorder. British Journal of Psychiatry
184:496-‐502.
Webster MJ, Knable MB, O'Grady J, Orthmann J, Weickert CS (2002) Regional specificity of
brain glucocorticoid receptor mRNA alterations in subjects with schizophrenia and
mood disorders. Molecular Psychiatry 7:985-‐994, 924.
Wilde GJ, Pringle AK, Wright P, Iannotti F (1997) Differential vulnerability of the CA1 and
CA3 subfields of the hippocampus to superoxide and hydroxyl radicals in vitro.
Journal of Neurochemistry 69:883-‐886.
84
Wright IC, Rabe-‐Hesketh S, Woodruff PW, David AS, Murray RM, Bullmore ET (2000) Meta-‐
analysis of regional brain volumes in schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry
157:16-‐25.
Yang H, Liu Y, Bai F, Zhang JY, Ma SH, Liu J, Xu ZD, Zhu HG, Ling ZQ, Ye D, Guan KL, Xiong Y
(2013) Tumor development is associated with decrease of TET gene expression and
5-‐methylcytosine hydroxylation. Oncogene 32:663-‐669.
Yanik M, Vural H, Tutkun H, Zoroglu SS, Sava HA, Herken H, Kocyigit A, Keles H, Akyol O
(2004) The role of the arginine-‐nitric oxide pathway in the pathogenesis of bipolar
affective disorder. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
254:43-‐47.
Yatham LN, Kennedy SH, O'Donovan C, Parikh S, MacQueen G, McIntyre R, Sharma V,
Silverstone P, Alda M, Baruch P, Beaulieu S, Daigneault A, Milev R, Young LT,
Ravindran A, Schaffer A, Connolly M, Gorman CP (2005) Canadian Network for
Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) guidelines for the management of
patients with bipolar disorder: consensus and controversies. Bipolar Disorders 7
Suppl 3:5-‐69.
Yucel K, Taylor VH, McKinnon MC, Macdonald K, Alda M, Young LT, MacQueen GM (2008)
Bilateral hippocampal volume increase in patients with bipolar disorder and short-‐
term lithium treatment. Neuropsychopharmacology 33:361-‐367.
Zhang R, Zhang L, Zhang Z, Wang Y, Lu M, LaPointe M, Chopp M (2001) A nitric oxide donor
induces neurogenesis and reduces functional deficits after stroke in rats. Annals of
Neurology 50:602-‐611.
85
Appendix A
Table A1. Selected characteristics of all studies included in the meta-‐analysis of oxidative stress markers in bipolar disorder patients compared to healthy controls, sorted by sample type.
Reference Number (patients/ controls)
Bipolar patients Sample
Marker Assay Results of BD compared to healthy controls Manic Depressed Euthymic First-‐
episode Drug-‐free Peripheral
Post-‐mortem brain
Sample Type: Blood
Abdalla et al., 1986
20/58 NA NA NA NA NA RBC -‐ SOD Nitroblue tetrazolium
Increased
GPx nmol NADPH oxidized/min
NS
Andreazza et al., 2007 (b)
32/32 NA NA NA NA 0 Whole blood
-‐ DNA/RNA dam.
Comet assay DNA damage increased
Kuloglu et al.,2002
23/20 NA NA NA NA NA RBC -‐ SOD Nitroblue tetrazolium
Increased
GPx nmol NADPH oxidized/min
NS
Lipid perox.
TBARS
Increased
Ozcan et al., 2004
30/21 16 2 0 0 0 RBC -‐ SOD Nitroblue tetrazolium
NS
CAT μmol of H2O2 consumed/min
Decreased in all BD groups
86
GPx nmol NADPH oxidized/min
Decreased in pretreatment group
Raffa et al., 2012
30/40 8 5 17 0 NA RBC -‐ SOD Pyrogallol NS
CAT μmol of H2O2 consumed/min
Decreased
GPx nmol NADPH oxidized/min
NS
Ranjekar et al., 2003
10/31 NA NA NA NA NA RBC -‐ SOD Nitroblue tetrazolium
NS
CAT μmol of H2O2 consumed/min
Decreased
GPx nmol NADPH oxidized/min
NS
Lipid perox.
TBARS NS
Soeiro-‐de-‐Souza et al., 2013
50/50 26 24 0 NA 50 Whole blood
-‐ DNA/RNA dam.
ELISA Increased hydroxylated guanine in DNA
Versace et al., 2013
24/18 0 0 24 0 0 Whole blood
-‐ Lipid perox.
Lipid hydroperoxides assay kit
Increased
Sample Type: Plasma
Ozcan et al., 2004
30/21 16 2 0 0 0 Plasma -‐ NO Greiss reaction Decreased in pretreatment group
87
Savas et al., 2002
44/21 44 0 0 0 0 Plasma -‐ NO Greiss reaction Increased
Yanik et al., 2004
43/31 43 0 0 0 0 Plasma -‐ NO Greiss reaction Increased
Sample Type: Serum
Andreazza et al., 2007
85/32 32 21 32 0 0 Serum -‐ SOD Adrenochrome Increased in depressed and manic patients
CAT μmol of H2O2 consumed/min
Decreased in euthymic and manic patients
GPx nmol NADPH oxidized/min
Increased in euthymic patients
Lipid perox.
TBARS
Increased in manic, decreased in euthymic patients
Andreazza et al., 2009
30/30 (early BD) 30/30
(late BD)
NA NA NA NA 0 Serum -‐ GPx nmol NADPH oxidized/min
NS
PCC DNPH reaction
NS
3-‐NT ELISA
Increased in early and late stage patients
Banerjee et al., 2012
73/35 0 0 48 25 NA Serum -‐ Lipid perox.
TBARS Increased in all BD groups
Gergerlioglu et al., 2007
29/30 29 0 0 0 0 Serum -‐ SOD Nitroblue tetrazolium
Decreased
NO Greiss reaction Increased
88
Kapczinski et al., 2011
60/80 20 20 20 0 0 Serum -‐ Lipid perox.
TBARS Increased in manic and depressed patients
PCC DNPH reaction
Increased in manic and depressed
Kunz et al., 2008
83/32 32 19 32 0 NA Serum -‐ SOD Adrenochrome Increased in manic and depressed patients
Lipid perox.
TBARS Increased in all BD groups
Machado-‐Vieira et al., 2007
45/30 45 0 0 0 30 Serum -‐ SOD Adrenochrome Increased in drug-‐free manic patients
CAT μmol of H2O2 consumed/min
Increased
Lipid perox.
TBARS
Increased in drug-‐free manic patients
Magalhaes et al., 2012
53/89 (lipid perox.)
48/75 (PCC)
11 42 0 NA 44 Serum -‐ Lipid perox.
TBARS NS
PCC
DNPH reaction Increased
Ozcan et al., 2004
30/21 16 2 0 0 0 Serum -‐ Lipid perox.
TBARS
Increased in pre-‐ and post-‐treatment groups
89
Savas et al., 2006
27/20 0 0 27 0 0 Serum -‐ SOD Nitroblue tetrazolium
Increased
NO Greiss reaction
Increased
Selek et al., 2008
30/30 0 30 0 0 0 Serum -‐ SOD Nitroblue tetrazolium
Decreased
NO Greiss reaction
Increased
Sample Type: Post-‐mortem brain
Andreazza et al., 2010
15/15 NA NA NA NA 0 -‐ PFC (BA10)
PCC DNPH reaction Increased
3-‐NT
ELISA Increased
Andreazza et al., 2013
16/26 NA NA NA NA 0 -‐ PFC (BA10)
Lipid perox.
Lipid hydroperoxides assay kit and 4-‐HNE ELISA
4-‐HNE increased in synaptosomal section, no difference in LPH
PCC DNPH reaction Increased in synaptosomal proteins
3-‐NT Immunoblotting Increased in mitochondrial proteins
Benes et al., 20031
10/18 NA NA NA NA 4 -‐ ACC DNA/RNA dam.
Klenow method NS
Buttner et al., 20071
14/14 NA NA NA NA 2 -‐ ACC (BA24)
DNA/RNA dam.
Klenow method Scission increased in non-‐GABAergic cells only
90
Che et al., 20102
15/15 NA NA NA NA 3 -‐ Anterior hippo.
DNA/RNA dam.
Immunohisto-‐chemistry
RNA damage increased in patients more than DNA
Gawryluk et al., 2011
14/12 NA NA NA NA NA -‐ PFC (BA10)
GPx Immunoblotting NS
Gigante et al., 2011
35/35 NA NA NA NA NA -‐ Dorso-‐lateral PFC (BA9)
SOD Immunoblotting NS
Mustak et al., 2010
10/8 NA NA NA NA 10 -‐ Multiple brain regions
DNA/RNA dam.
Klenow method and incorporation of 3[H]-‐dTTP
Increased single and double stranded DNA breaks
Wang et al., 2009
15/15 NA NA NA NA NA -‐ ACC Lipid perox.
Immunnohisto-‐chemistry
Increased
Abbreviations: BD, bipolar disorder; RBC, red blood cells; SOD, superoxide dismutase; GPx, glutathione peroxidase; NS, not significant; CAT, catalase; TBARS, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances; NADPH, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; NA, not available; PCC, protein carbonyl content; 3-‐NT, 3-‐nitrotyrosine; DNPH, 2,4-‐Dinitrophenylhydrazine; ELISA, enzyme-‐linked immunosorbent assay; PFC, prefrontal cortex; LPH, lipid hydroperoxides; 4-‐HNE, 4-‐hydroxynonenal; ACC, anterior cingulate cortex; GABA, gamma-‐aminobutyric acid; NO, nitric oxide. 1. Not included in meta-‐analysis due to missing data 2. Patient info obtained from Dowlatshahi et al., 1999