Oxidation-Reduction (Redox) Reactions - San...
Transcript of Oxidation-Reduction (Redox) Reactions - San...
Oxidation-Reduction (Redox) Reactions
Eh, Ph, and the chemistry of natural waters
Important equations and terms for redox reactions:
ΔGR = nFEΔGR = ΔGR
° + RTlnQEh = E = E° + (2.303RT/nF)logQ = (0.05916/n)logQE° = -(0.05916/n)logKEh = 1.23 + 0.01479log[O2] - 0.05916pH
R = 1.987 x 10-3 kcal/mol°T = 298.15°KF = 23.06 kcal/Vn = number of electrons transferred in the reactionQ = reaction quotientE° = standard potential for a half-reactionEh = electromotive force (emf) generated between an electrode
in any state and the H2 electrode (the referencehydrogen scale Eh) in standard state (theoretical voltage)
Nernst factor at standard state
Zn(s) + Cu 2+ (aq) ←→ Zn 2+ (aq) +Cu(s)
Each metal has a different relative preference for electrons
Electrode Potential
Separate the reaction into half-reactions and add the e-
Zn(s) + Cu 2+ (aq) ←→ Zn 2+ (aq) +Cu(s)
Zn(s) ←→ Zn 2+ (aq) + 2e-
Cu 2+ (aq) + 2e-←→ Cu(s)There will be Energy gained or lost by the exchange of e-
Unfortunately, such measurements are not possible (nor would these reactions occur in the natural environment:electrons are not given up except to another element or species).
This requires the establishment of an arbitrary reference value
Hydrogen Scale Potential Eh
−+→← + eaqHgH )()(2
12
The potential measured for the entire reaction is thenassigned to the half-cell reaction of interest:
Zn(s) ←→ Zn 2+ (aq) + 2e- becomes
++ +→←+ HsZngHaqZn 2)()()( 22
The potential for this reaction = -0.763 V
So the Eh of the reduction of Zn2+ to Zn (s) = -0.763 V
(+) Eh means reaction moves left to right(-) Eh means reaction moves right to left
(+) Eh means the metal ion is reduced by H2(g) to the metal
(-) Eh means the metal will be oxidized to the ion and H+ is reduced
++ +→←+ HsZngHaqZn 2)()()( 22
Eh = E = E° + (2.303RT/nF)logQ = (0.05916/n)logQ
Calculating the Eh of Net Reactions
We can calculate Eh values by algebraic combinations of thereactions and potentials that are listed in Table 14.3 of the text.
There is, however, a “catch”
Calculate the Eh for the reaction:Fe3+(aq) + 3e- ←→ Fe(s)
This reaction is the algebraic sum of two reactions listed in Table 14.3
Fe3+(aq) + e- ←→ Fe2+(aq) Fe2+(aq) + 2e- ←→ Fe(s)
Since the reactions sum, we might assume that we can simply sum the Eh values to obtain the Eh of the net reaction.
Doing so, we obtain an Eh of 0.33 V. However, the true Eh of this reaction is -0.037 V.
What did we do wrong?
Fe3+(aq) + 3e- ←→ Fe(s)
We have neglected to take into consideration the number of electrons exchanged.
In the algebraic combination of Eh values, we need to multiply the Eh for each component reaction by the number of electrons exchanged.
We then divide the sum of these values by number of electrons exchanged in the net reaction to obtain the Eh of the net reaction
∑=i
iinet
Ehzz
netEh1
)(
Fe3+(aq) + e- ←→ Fe2+(aq) Fe2+(aq) + 2e- ←→ Fe(s)
∑=i
iinet
Ehzz
netEh1
)(
where the sum is over the component reactions i.
By Hess’s Law, the ΔG of the net reaction must be the simple sum of the component reaction ΔG’s
…but Eh values are obtained by multiplying ΔG by z.
ΔGR = nFE
∑=i
iinet
Ehzz
netEh1
)(
Eh = 1/3 (1*0.77+2*-0.44) = 1/3 (0.77-0.88) = 1/3(-0.11)=-0.037
Fe3+(aq) + e- ←→ Fe2+(aq) Fe2+(aq) + 2e- ←→ Fe(s)
nF
G-E
reaction-half of potential std. E
C25at volts0.05916 factor Nernst F
2.303RT
electrons ofnumber n
kcal/voltg 23.061 constant faraday F
Kelvinin temp. T
kcal/mol 0.001987 constant gasR
(D)(C)
(B)(A)ln
nF
RT EEh(volts)
ofo
o
o
o
dc
bao
Δ=
=
==
=
==
=
==
+=
eq
reduced oxidized
dD cC e bB aA
lnFG- E
][P
][Hln
F
RT E Eh
-
oR
o
1/2H
o
2
+=++
Δ=
++=
n
Eh = E° + (2.303RT/nF)logQ = (0.05916/n)logQ
From Garrels & Christ (1965)
If an environment is characterized by a certain redoxreaction, it has a characteristic Eh
Oxidizing
Reducing
Eh = 1.23 + 0.01479log[O2] - 0.05916pH
Similar to Fig. 14.4 on p. 238
[O2 ] = 10 -83.1 atm
[O2 ] = 1 atm
[O2] conditions for natural waters
1) write the equation for the reaction
)()()( 2221
2 gHgOlOH +↔
2) “electrode” the equation
−++↔ + egOHlOH 2)(2)( 221
2
2e-
O in H2O gives up 2e-
3)
( )22/12 ][][log
2
05916.0 ++= HOEEh o
4) get Eo from ΔGro
kcalOHGG
eGOGHG
lOHGeGOGHGG
of
or
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
or
687.56
0
)](([)](2)(2/1)(2[
2
2
22
+=−=Δ
=−==
−−++=Δ+
+
Vx
Eo 23.106.232
687.56+=+=
6)
( )pHOEh
HOEh
05916.0]log[01479.023.1
][][log2
05916.023.1
2
22/12
−+=
+= +
This demonstrates the Eh - pH relationship as shown in figure 14.4 p. 238 and is the equation for the lines limitingthe minimum and maximum [O2] for natural waters
Figure 14.11 on p. 248
Oxidizing
Reducing