Oxford Colorectal Restorative Proctocolectomy The Failing Pouch Neil Mortensen MD FRCS Department of...

44
Oxford Colorecta Restorative Proctocolectomy The Failing Pouch The Failing Pouch Neil Mortensen MD FRCS Neil Mortensen MD FRCS Department of Colorectal Department of Colorectal Surgery Radcliffe Hospital, Surgery Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford Oxford M62 Course 2006

Transcript of Oxford Colorectal Restorative Proctocolectomy The Failing Pouch Neil Mortensen MD FRCS Department of...

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

The Failing PouchThe Failing Pouch

Neil Mortensen MD FRCS Neil Mortensen MD FRCS Department of Colorectal Surgery Department of Colorectal Surgery

Radcliffe Hospital, OxfordRadcliffe Hospital, Oxford

M62 Course 2006

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Parks and Nicholls

Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis

BMJ 1978;2:65-8

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Pouches around the World 2000Pouches around the World 2000

USA 7600

UK 2500

Sweden 2500

Canada 1500

Germany 1100

France 250

Australia 200

Estimated Total 15650

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Pouch surgery – the ecstasy

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Pouch surgery – the agony

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Pouch Failure

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Bleeding

Infarction

Peritonitis

Anastomotic leak

Pouch cutaneous fistula

Pouch vaginal fistula

Stricture

Small bowel stricture

Pouch complications

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Oxford Pouch ExcisionOxford Pouch Excision

408 IPAA

30 Pouch excisions, 7 immediate

27 (6.6%) in house

3 elsewhere

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Oxford Pouch ExcisionOxford Pouch Excision

Reasons for excision

8 pouchitis

6 ischaemia

6 sepsis

5 Crohns

3 incontinence

1 bleeding

1 desmoid

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Timing of pouch excision

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 <20 years after pouch construction

number

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Indications for Pouch Excision at St Mark’s

St Mark’s n=996

Referred n=245 Total

No patients 58(5.6%) 10(4%) 68Pelvic sepsis 28 5 33(48.5%)

Pouch fistula 24 4

Crohns 3 2Poor function 21 3 24(35.2%)

Pouchitis 4 1

other 5 1Karoui, Cohen, and Nicholls DCR 2004

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Long Term Failure Rates from St Mark’s

Karoui Cohen and Nicholls DCR 2004

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Please don’t let it

leak

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Causes of Pouch FailureCauses of Pouch Failure

49 (8.8%) of 551 pouches failed

9 (1.6%) defunctioned

- 21 (39%) anastomotic leak

- 13 (23%) poor function

- 7 (12%) pouchitis

- 7 (12%) pouch leakage

- 7 (12%) perianal disease

- 3 (5%) variousMacRae et al Dis Col Rect 1997

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Restorative Proctocolectomy - Anastomotic LeakageRestorative Proctocolectomy - Anastomotic Leakage

n % leaks

single stage 22 32

previous colectomy 49 12*

steroids > 15mg 15 33

no steroids 56 14*

under 40 yrs 54 13

over 40 yrs 17 35*

Pemberton et al 1994

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Patient Selection : Patient Selection : SteroidsPatient Selection : Patient Selection : Steroids

• 671 patients

• 20 mg Prednisolone threshold

• no differences in septic complications

• IPAA without diversion, 50% complication on high dose steriods

Ziv et al Dis Col Rect 1996

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Incidence and Impact Pelvic Abscess after IPAAIncidence and Impact Pelvic Abscess after IPAA

73 of 1508 pelvic abscess

• pouch failure 26%

• 55% need transabdominal salvage

• 8% local surgery

• 37% non surgical

• functional outcome poorer

Farouk et al Dis Col Rect 1998

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Patient Selection - indeterminate colitisPatient Selection - indeterminate colitis

• 71 indeterminate v. 1232 UC

• no difference in frequency, continence or pouchitis

• failure rate 19% v. 8%

McIntyre et al Dis Col Rect 1995

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Long Term Results of IPAA in Patients with Crohn’s DiseaseLong Term Results of IPAA in Patients with Crohn’s Disease

37 patients

Original diagnosis UC (22), indeterminate (9), Crohn’s (6),

Complex fistulas in 11

Site of Crohn’s pouch (20), anal (4), both (10)

Failure in 17 Sagar et al Dis Col Rect 1996

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Pouch Failure & Crohn’s - Cleveland ClinicPouch Failure & Crohn’s - Cleveland Clinic

Overall failure 3.4%, 1.1% non function

Of 34 failures - 17 had Crohn’s

25% Crohn’s fail

Fazio et al Ann Surg 1995

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Treating the early abscess or anastomotic dehiscence

• EUA assessment

• Abscess – drain mushroom catheter, CT drain

• Dehiscence – drain, early resuture or advancement

• Wait, pouchogram, consider re operation

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Fistula at AnastomosisFistula at Anastomosis

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Pouch related fistulaPouch related fistula

59 of 1040 IPAA

• 24 pouch vaginal

• 11 pouch cutaneous

• 16 pouch perineal

• 8 pouch presacral

32% eventually excised

Ozuner et al Dis Col Rect 1997

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Pouch Related Fistula after Restorative ProctocolectomyPouch Related Fistula after Restorative Proctocolectomy

21 patients, in 6 > 5 m after ileostomy closure

Site : anastomosis 14

vertical staple line 2

efferent limb end 5

Adverse factors : late fisutula

enterocutaneous

pouch vaginal

suspect Crohn’s

Paye et al 1996 BJS

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Try Local Repair First if:Try Local Repair First if:

• gross sepsis absent

• granulation tissue minimal

• fistulas close to anal verge

• strictures are short

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Repeat IPAA - indicationsRepeat IPAA - indications

• mechanical outlet obstruction

• lack of reservoir capacity

• sepsis

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Pouch Revision for septic complications35 patients repeat IPAA

Outcome 86% functioning pouches, 4 excised

Function 57% good, 43% fair or poor,

Pad usage and seepage 60-70%

Fazio et al Ann Surg 1998

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Pouch Revision by Disconnection - ReconnectionPouch Revision by Disconnection - Reconnection

23 patients 9 long efferent

4 sepsis fistula

3 redundant blind limb

3 twisted pouch

3 anastomotic problem

Pouch Salvaged in 16

Good function 11

Pouch excision 6

Sagar et al 1996 BJS

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Long Term Results of Abdominal SalvageLong Term Results of Abdominal Salvage

• 112 underwent 117 pouch salvage procedures

• Common indications - sepsis 45, stricture 13, retained stump 35

• 21% pouch failure

• Associated with Crohn’s, sepsis

Tekkis et al BJS 2006

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy Cumulative Pouch SurvivalCumulative Pouch Survival

Tekkis et al BJS 2006

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Restorative Proctocolectomy - TechniqueRestorative Proctocolectomy - Technique

Get it right first timeGet it right first time

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

The risks of maintaining Columnar CuffThe risks of maintaining Columnar Cuff

- Some 6-10% of the total anorectal mucosa is retained

- risk of malignancy

- risk of inflammation

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Cuffitis - symptomsCuffitis - symptoms

• urgency

• frequency

• leakage

• bleeding

• anal irritation or burning discomfort

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Cuffitis and Inflammatory ChangesCuffitis and Inflammatory Changes

113 patients, 715 biopsies

• acute inflammation in columnar cuff in 13%

• in 9% symptomatic with endoscopic inflammation

• no relationship with pouchitis, pouch frequency or anastomotic height

Thompson-Fawcett, Warren, Mortensen Dis Col Rect 1999

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Cuffitis - TreatmentCuffitis - Treatment

• medical - largely empirical

- steroids, per anal or oral

- 5ASA compounds, per anal or oral

- lignocaine jelly, per anal

• surgery - mucosectomy Curran & Hill 1992

- mucosectomy & pouch advancement

Fazio & Tjandra 1994

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Pouch Vaginal FistulaPouch Vaginal Fistula

• avoid catching vagina with stapler

• repair by endo vaginal advancement flap

• defunction ?

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Small Bowel ProblemsSmall Bowel Problems

Adhesions 15-30% symptomatic

5-10% need re-operation

Functional obstruction - ileal brake

Small bowel bacterial overgrowth

Crohn’s disease (5-7%)

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Pouches Misbehaving Badly - the 3 problem areasPouches Misbehaving Badly - the 3 problem areas

Upstream Small bowel

Within the pouch

Pouch outlet

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.00 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

overall

chronic

Follow up (m)

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ri

sk

Keranen et al Dis Col Rect 1997

Cumulative Risk of Pouchitis

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Refractory PouchitisRefractory Pouchitis

• Review the previous histology

• Is there a pelvic abscess?

• Is there partial obstruction to ileum?

• Is there a small bowel motility disturbance

• Is there dietary intolerance?

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

SummarySummary

10% lose pouch

10% have poor function but prefer to keep their pouch

80% report an excellent quality of life

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

But….. Some worries

Increasing numbers of patients needing chronic

ciproxin dosingPerianal disease

being treated with infliximab