Overview and Outlook for the P/C Insurance Industry Casualty Actuaries of New England April 2, 2012...
-
Upload
claude-jackson -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of Overview and Outlook for the P/C Insurance Industry Casualty Actuaries of New England April 2, 2012...
Overview and Outlook forthe P/C Insurance Industry
Casualty Actuaries of New EnglandApril 2, 2012 Sturbridge, MA
Steven N. Weisbart, Ph.D., CLU, Senior Vice President & Chief EconomistInsurance Information Institute 110 William Street New York, NY 10038Office: 212.346.5540 Cell: (917) 494-5945 [email protected] www.iii.org
Not All Data in a PowerPoint SlideAre Accurate or Reliable
3
The Economic Situation
Its Effect on the Industry’sExposure Base, Growth,
Investments, and Profitability
4
Length of US Business Cycles,1929–Present*
10 1116
6
168 8
19
50
80
3745
39
24
106
36
58
12
92
120
73
33
43
138 11 10 8
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
Aug1929
May1937
Feb1945
Nov1948
Jul1953
Aug1957
Apr1960
Dec1969
Nov1973
Jan1980
Jul1981
Jul1990
Mar2001
Dec2007
Month Recession Started
Contraction Expansion Following
*Through March 2012. ** Post-WW II period through end of most recent completed expansion. Sources: National Bureau of Economic Research; Insurance Information Institute.
Average DurationRecession* = 10.9 MosExpansion** = 60.5 Mos
Length of Expansions Greatly Exceeds
Contractions
Duration (Months)
5
A Weak Recovery is Forecast:Real GDP Growth*, Yearly, 1970-2013F
Estimates/Forecasts from Blue Chip Economic Indicators, 3/2012 issue. *chained 2005 $Sources: (GDP) U.S. Department of Commerce at http://www.bea.gov/national/xls/gdpchg.xls.
-4.5%
-3.0%
-1.5%
0.0%
1.5%
3.0%
4.5%
6.0%
7.5%Real GDP Growth (%) The “consensus” forecast is
for at least two more years of real yearly GDP growth below 3% -- weaker than after most
recent recessions
6
US Real GDP Growth, quarterly*
* Estimates/Forecasts from Blue Chip Economic IndicatorsSource: US Department of Commerce, Blue Economic Indicators 3/2012 issue (forecasts); Insurance Information Institute.
1.7%
3.8%
3.9%
3.8%
2.5%
2.3%
0.4% 1.
3% 2.0% 3.
0%
2.1%
2.2%
2.4%
2.6%
2.5%
2.7%
2.9%
3.0%
-1.8
%
1.3%
-3.7
%
-8.9
% -6.7
%
-0.7
%
-12%
-9%
-6%
-3%
0%
3%
6%
08:1
Q
08:2
Q
08:3
Q
08:4
Q
09:1
Q
09:2
Q
09:3
Q
09:4
Q
10:1
Q
10:2
Q
10:3
Q
10:4
Q
11:1
Q
11:2
Q
11:3
Q
11:4
Q
12:1
Q
12:2
Q
12:3
Q
12:4
Q
13:1
Q
13:2
Q
13:3
Q
13:4
Q
Demand for insurance continues to be affected by a sluggish economy
Real GDP Growth (%)
We need stronger growth than this to return the
economy to its full capacity anytime soon.
Worst quarterly drop since
1958:q1 (-11.1%)
7
March 2012 Forecasts of Quarterly US Real GDP for 2012-13
1.6%
2.0%2.2% 2.1%
2.5%2.7%
2.9% 3.0%3.3%
3.5% 3.6%4.0%
1.8%1.4%
1.7%1.5%
2.6%2.1%2.2%
2.4%
3.4%
3.0%2.9%2.8%
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
12:Q1 12:Q2 12:Q3 12:Q4 13:Q1 13:Q2 13:Q3 13:Q4
10 Most PessimisticMedian10 Most Optimistic
Sources: Blue Chip Economic Indicators (3/12); Insurance Information Institute
Real GDP Growth Rate
8
A Look Back: March 2011 Forecastsof Quarterly US Real GDP for 2011
2.6%2.5% 2.5%2.7% 3.4%
3.4%3.4% 3.4%
4.2%4.1%4.2%4.2%
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
11:Q1 11:Q2 11:Q3 11:Q4
10 Most Pessimistic Median 10 Most Optimistic
Sources: Blue Chip Economic Indicators (2/12); Insurance Information Institute
Real GDP Growth Rate
A month into 2011, all forecasts for the year predicted steady growth,but at different rates.
9
Off Target: March 2011 Forecasts for 2011 vs. Actual US Real GDP
0.4%
1.3%
1.8%
3.0%2.6%2.5% 2.5%2.7% 3.4%
3.4%3.4% 3.4%
4.2%4.1%4.2%4.2%
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
11:Q1 11:Q2 11:Q3 11:Q4
10 Most Pessimistic Median 10 Most Optimistic Actual
Sources: Blue Chip Economic Indicators (2/12); Insurance Information Institute
Real GDP Growth Rate
This 3.0% growth
number is preliminary and will be
revised
Even the most pessimistic forecasts were too bullish for the first three quarters of 2011. They were close to the fourth quarter number, though.
First Half of 2012: Fastest Growth [3+%] Expected in MI, AL, NV, ND, SC
10
MA: +2.89%VT: +2.57%CT: +2.04% NH: +1.87%ME: +0.05% RI: -3.57%
The Strength of the Economy Will Influence P/C Insurer
Growth Opportunities
12
Growth Will Expand Insurable Exposures and Help Absorb Excess Capital
12
Consumer Sentiment Survey,Jan 1978-Mar 2012 (1966 = 100)
13
14
$200,000
$300,000
$400,000
$500,000
Dollar Value* of Manufacturers’ Shipments Monthly, Jan. 1992—Jan. 2012
*seasonally adjustedSource: U.S. Census Bureau, Full Report on Manufacturers’ Shipments, Inventories, and Orders, http://www.census.gov/manufacturing/m3/
Monthly shipments are nearly back to peak (which happened in July 2008, 8 months into the recession). Trough in May 2009. Growth from trough to December 2011 was 30.2%. This growth leads to gains in many commercial exposures: WC, Commercial
Auto, Property and Various Liability Coverages
The value of Manufacturing Shipments in Dec. 2011 was up 30.2%
to $464B from its May 2009 trough. Dec. figure is only 4.5% below its previous record high in July 2008.
$ Millions
14
15
Manufacturing Growth for Selected Sectors, Jan. 2012 vs. Jan. 2011
13.4%
7.1% 7.5%10.9%
5.2%8.8%8.4%
10.1%
31.2%
10.1%
5.8%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
All
Ma
nu
fact
uri
ng
Du
rab
le M
fg.
Pri
ma
ryM
eta
ls
Ma
chin
ery
Ele
ctri
cal
Eq
uip
.
Tra
nsp
ort
atio
nE
qu
ip.
No
n-D
ura
ble
Mfg
.
Fo
od
Pro
du
cts
Pe
tro
leu
m &
Co
al
Ch
em
ica
l
Pla
stic
s &
Ru
bb
er
Manufacturing Is Expanding Across a Wide Range of Sectors that Will Contribute to Growth in Insurable Exposures Including: WC, Commercial
Property, Commercial Auto and Many Liability Coverages
Growth (%)
Manufacturing of durable goods has
been especially strong
*seasonally adjustedSource: U.S. Census Bureau, Full Report on Manufacturers’ Shipments, Inventories, and Orders, http://www.census.gov/manufacturing/m3/
Durables: +10.1% Non-Durables: +7.1%
16
Labor Market Trends
Job Growth Finally Taking Hold,Bolstering the Commercial &
Personal Lines Exposure Bases,but Problems Remain
22
95
71
72
46
12
16
1-4
-73
20 6
1 75
47
41
-13
6-1
12
-21
5-2
16
-23
1-2
59
-29
4-4
25
-48
0-7
97
-65
8-8
39 -7
25
-78
7-8
02
-31
2-4
26 -2
96 -2
19
-18
4-2
32
-42
-12
0 -40
-27
19
38
4 92
92 12
81
15 1
96
13
41
40
11
92
57
26
12
64
10
81
02 1
75
52
21
61
39 17
8 23
4 28
52
33
14
1
(1,000)
(800)
(600)
(400)
(200)
0
200
400
Jan
-07
Ma
r-0
7
Ma
y-0
7
Jul-
07
Se
p-0
7
No
v-0
7
Jan
-08
Ma
r-0
8
Ma
y-0
8
Jul-
08
Se
p-0
8
No
v-0
8
Jan
-09
Ma
r-0
9
Ma
y-0
9
Jul-
09
Se
p-0
9
No
v-0
9
Jan
-10
Ma
r-1
0
Ma
y-1
0
Jul-
10
Se
p-1
0
No
v-1
0
Jan
-11
Ma
r-1
1
Ma
y-1
1
Jul-
11
Se
p-1
1
No
v-1
1
Jan
-12
Monthly Change in Private Employment*January 2007 through February 2012
(Thousands)
At the rate of job growth in December 2011 through February 2012,the unemployment rate will be down to 7.5% by the end of 2012.
*seasonally adjustedSources: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics: http://www.bls.gov/ces/home.htm; Insurance Information Institute.
Nov. ‘08.–Apr. 09 monthly losses were
the largest in the Post-WW II period
Private employers added jobs in every
one of the last 24 months
Payroll growth since Jan 2010: $340.3
billion, equivalent to roughly $2.25 billion in
WC premiums
21
1-1
21
10
-49
-56
-43 -1
2-1
53
00
-51
0-8
48
46
43
2-2
59
-15
0-1
79 -14
22
4-1
3-2
0 -9-3
7 -15
-13
-54 -1
8-7
93
3-1
4-2
7-2
1-1
1-1
-6
(300)
(200)
(100)
0
100
200
300
400
500
Jan
-09
Ma
r-0
9
Ma
y-0
9
Jul-
09
Se
p-0
9
No
v-0
9
Jan
-10
Ma
r-1
0
Ma
y-1
0
Jul-
10
Se
p-1
0
No
v-1
0
Jan
-11
Ma
r-1
1
Ma
y-1
1
Jul-
11
Se
p-1
1
No
v-1
1
Jan
-12
Monthly Change in Government Employment*
(Thousands)
In 2011 employment by government at all levels dropped every month except August. Total jobs lost in last twelve months: 278,000.
*seasonally adjustedSources: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics: http://www.bls.gov/ces/home.htm; Insurance Information Institute.
January 2009 through February 2012
Census
17
-17
0
(25)
0
25
50
75
100
125
Sept report Oct report Nov report Jan revision
Private Employment Government Employment Total Nonfarm Employment
Report of August 2011 Changes in Private, Government, and Total Civilian Employment, Initial and Revised
(Thousands)
The September 2011 report for employment in August was dis-spiriting.BLS reported the U.S. economy added no net jobs.
Was the recovery stalling? Would we sink into another recession?
Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics: http://www.bls.gov/ces/home.htm; Insurance Information Institute
17
42
-17
15
0
57
(25)
0
25
50
75
100
125
Sept report Oct report Nov report Jan revision
Private Employment Government Employment Total Nonfarm Employment
Report of August 2011 Changes in Private, Government, and Total Civilian Employment, Initial and Revised
(Thousands)
In the October report the August figures were revised.This report showed gains in both private and government employment,
for a net addition of 57,000 jobs. Where were these revisions (and their implications) reported?
Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics: http://www.bls.gov/ces/home.htm; Insurance Information Institute
17
42
72
-17
15
32
0
57
105
(25)
0
25
50
75
100
125
Sept report Oct report Nov report Jan revision
Private Employment Government Employment Total Nonfarm Employment
Report of August 2011 Changes in Private, Government, and Total Civilian Employment, Initial and Revised
(Thousands)
In the November report the August employment numbers were revised again, now showing that the economy in August to adding 105,000 net
new jobs. Latest report: +85,000 jobs.Where were these revisions (and their implications) reported?
Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics: http://www.bls.gov/ces/home.htm; Insurance Information Institute
17
42
72
52
-17
15
32 33
0
57
105
85
(25)
0
25
50
75
100
125
Sept report Oct report Nov report Jan revision
Private Employment Government Employment Total Nonfarm Employment
Report of August 2011 Changes in Private, Government, and Total Civilian Employment, Initial and Revised
(Thousands)
In the January 2012 report for August, BLS revised the U.S. numbers for all of 2011 to reflect new population estimates, on which the
employment samples from each month are projected.Latest August data: +85,000 jobs.
Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics: http://www.bls.gov/ces/home.htm; Insurance Information Institute
23
Percentage Change in Nonfarm Employment,US & New England states, Jan 2012 vs. Jan 2011
-0.3
0.7
0.4
1.2
0.9
0.7
1.5
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
US NH VT CT ME MA RI
*Preliminary data for January 2012, seasonally adjusted.
Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Regional and State Employment and Unemployment—January 2012, published March 13, 2012; Insurance Information Institute.
Percent Change
24
(Millions of Units)
Private Housing Starts, 1990-2013F
1.481.47
1.621.641.571.60
1.711.85
1.962.07
1.80
1.36
0.90
0.550.590.610.73
0.89
1.351.46
1.291.20
1.01
1.19
0.0
0.3
0.6
0.9
1.2
1.5
1.8
2.1
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
F
13
F
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau and Department of Housing and Urban Development (history) at http://www.census.gov/const/newresconst.pdf ; Blue Chip Economic Indicators (3/2012), forecasts; Insurance Information Institute.
Weak home construction forecast implies little exposure growth likely for Homeowners insurers for the next few years,
but homeowners might fortify homes to mitigate storm and other damage.
Forecast range for
2012: 610,000 to
900,000
Forecast range for
2013: 680,000 to 1,450,000
Single vs. Multi-Family Housing Starts,Annually, 2001-2012*
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012*
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
units in multi-family buildings single family units
*January 2012 data, annualized, seasonally-adjusted, preliminarySource: US Census Bureau at http://www.census.gov/construction/nrc/pdf/newresconst.pdf
Thousands of Units, Multi-Family
The slump is mainly in single-family housing,but starts of multi-family units also plunged in 2009-10.
Multi-family-unit starts rose in 2011, and
single-family starts are starting up in 2012.
Thousands of Units, Single Family
Multi-family plunge didn’t begin until 2009
Single family plunge began
in 2006
26
Private Housing Starts in the Northeast US, Monthly*, 1990-2012
*seasonally-adjusted annual rate; data through January 2012Sources: U.S. Census Bureau and Department of Housing and Urban Development at http://www.census.gov/const/newresconst.pdf ; Insurance Information Institute.
Billions
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
250
'90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12
27
16.9
16.5
16.1
13.2
10.4
11.6
12.7
14.3 14
.8
16.9
16.617
.117.5
17.8
17.4
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12F 13F
(Millions of Units)
The Car-Buying Slump Will Create Pressure to Replace Aging Vehicles
Sources: history--U.S. Department of Commerce; forecasts (including 2011 preliminary--Blue Chip Economic Indicators (3/2012); Insurance Information Institute; USA Today 8/10/2011 edition (AAA Survey).
Many more older cars are on the road today than In “normal” times. Previously in a 3-year span, new cars would replace about 35 million old cars, but in 2008-10 only about 27 million old cars were replaced.
2011 AAA Survey: 1 in 4 drivers have neglected repairs and maintenance because of the
economyForecast range for
2012: 13.4 to
15.1
Forecast range for
2013: 13.9 to
16.0
66%
68%
70%
72%
74%
76%
78%
80%
82%
Mar
01
Jun 0
1
Sep 0
1
Dec 0
1
Mar
02
Jun 0
2
Sep 0
2
Dec 0
2
Mar
03
Jun 0
3
Sep 0
3
Dec 0
3
Mar
04
Jun 0
4
Sep 0
4
Dec 0
4
Mar
05
Jun 0
5
Sep 0
5
Dec 0
5
Mar
06
Jun 0
6
Sep 0
6
Dec 0
6
Mar
07
Jun 0
7
Sep 0
7
Dec 0
7
Mar
08
Jun 0
8
Sep 0
8
Dec 0
8
Mar
09
Jun 0
9
Sep 0
9
Dec 0
9
Mar
10
Jun 1
0
Sep 1
0
Dec 1
0
Mar
11
Jun 1
1
Sep 1
1
Dec 1
1
Recovery in Capacity Utilization is a Positive Sign for Commercial Exposures
Source: Federal Reserve Board statistical releases at http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/Current/default.htm. 28
Percent of Industrial Capacity
Hurricane Katrina
March 2001-November 2001
recession
“Full Capacity”
The closer the economy is to operating at “full
capacity,” the greater the inflationary pressure
The US operated at 78.7% of industrial capacity in Feb. 2012, above the June 2009
low of 68.3% and close to its post-crisis peak
December 2007-June 2009 Recession
March 2001 through February 2012
28
31
Inflation Trends/Forecastsand Effects on Claims
32
Historic and Forecast Annual Inflation Rates, (CPI-U, %), 1990–2017F
2.8 2.6
1.51.9
3.3 3.4
1.3
2.5 2.3
3.0
3.8
2.8
3.8
-0.4
1.6
3.2
2.2 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.52.9
2.4
3.23.0
5.14.9
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12F13F14F15F16F17F
Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Blue Chip Economic Indicators, 3/12 (forecasts).
The slack in the U.S. economy suggests that inflationary pressures should remain subdued for an extended period of times. Energy, health care and
commodity prices, plus U.S. debt burden, remain longer-run concerns
Annual Inflation Rates (%)
Inflation peaked at 5.6% in August 2008 on high energy and commodity crisis. The recession and the collapse of the
commodity bubble reduced inflationary pressures in 2009/10
Higher energy, commodity and food
prices pushed up inflation in 2011, but
not longer turn inflationary
expectations.
P/C Personal Insurance Claim Cost Drivers Grow Faster Than the Core CPI Suggests
Sources: Bureau of Labor Statistics; Insurance Information Institute.
3.2%
1.7%
6.8%
5.1%
4.2%
3.0% 3.2%
5.0%
7.1%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
Overall CPI "Core" CPI InpatientHospitalServices
OutpatientHospitalServices
PrescriptionDrugs
Medical CareCommodities
LegalServices
Motor VehicleParts &
Equipment
ResidentialMaint. &Repair
Healthcare costs are a major liability, med pay, and PIP claim cost driver. They are likely to grow faster than the CPI for the next few years, at least
33
Excludes Food and Energy
Price Level Change: 2011 vs. 2010
33
P/C Commercial Property Insurance Claim Cost Drivers Grow Faster than the Overall CPI Suggests
Sources: Bureau of Labor Statistics; Insurance Information Institute.
3.2%
7.1%
9.0%
5.4%
3.6%
1.7%
0%
3%
6%
9%
Overall CPI "Core" CPI Inputs toConstruction
Industries
Non-residentialmaintenance &
repair
Asphalt Paving &Roofing Materials
Plumbing Fixtures &Fittings
Copper prices spiked and retreated in 2011. In July its price was 33% higher than a year earlier; by November it cost 8% less than in November 2010.
34
Excludes Food and Energy
Price Level Change: 2011 vs. 2010
34
P/C Premium and Underwriting Trends
35
Mainly Driven by the Industry’s Underwriting Cycle,
Not the Economy
36
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11*
12
Soft Market Persisted into Early 2011 but Growth Returned: More in 2012?
(Percent)1975-78 1984-87 2000-03
*2011 and 2012 figures are A.M. Best EstimatesShaded areas denote “hard market” periodsSources: A.M. Best (historical and forecast), ISO, Insurance Information Institute.
Net Written Premiums Fell 0.7% in 2007 (First Decline
Since 1943) by 2.0% in 2008, and 4.2% in 2009, the First 3-Year Decline Since 1930-33.
NWP was up 3.5% (est.) in
2011
2012 forecast:
3.8% growth
37
P/C Insurance Industry Combined Ratio, 2001–2011:Q3*
* Excludes Mortgage & Financial Guaranty insurers 2008--2011. Including M&FG, 2008=105.1, 2009=100.7, 2010=102.4, 2011=109.9 Sources: A.M. Best, ISO.
95.7
99.3100.8
108.2
101.0
92.6
100.898.4
100.1
107.5
115.8
90
100
110
120
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011*
Best Combined
Ratio Since 1949 (87.6)
As Recently as 2001, Insurers Paid Out
Nearly $1.16 for Every $1 in Earned
Premiums
Relatively Low CAT Losses, Reserve Releases
Cyclical Deterioration
Heavy Use of Reinsurance Lowered Net
Losses
Relatively Low CAT Losses, Reserve Releases
Avg. CAT Losses,
More Reserve Releases
Higher CAT
Losses, Shrinking Reserve
Releases, Toll of Soft
Market
38
2
(2)
(8)
(3)
(7)(10) (10)
(4)
(0)
11
24
15
119
(5)
(9)
(14)
(10) (11)(7)
(5)(2)
-$20
-$15
-$10
-$5
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
$309
2
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
E
12
F
13
F
Pri
or
Yr.
Re
se
rve
Re
lea
se
($
B)
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8 Imp
ac
t on
Co
mb
ine
d R
atio
(Po
ints
)
Prior Yr. ReserveDevelopment ($B)
Impact onCombined Ratio(Points)
P/C Reserve Development, 1992–2013F
Reserve Releases Remained Strong in 2010 But Tapered Off in 2011. Releases Are Expected to
Further Diminish in 2012 and 2103Note: 2005 reserve development excludes a $6 billion loss portfolio transfer between American Re and Munich Re. Including this transaction, total prior year adverse development in 2005 was $7 billion. The data from 2000 and subsequent years excludes development from financial guaranty and mortgage insurance. Sources: Barclays Capital; A.M. Best.
Prior year reserve releases totaled $8.8
billion in the first half of 2010, up from
$7.1 billion in the first half of 2009
P/C Insurance IndustryFinancial Performance
39
A Resilient Industry in Challenging Times
P/C Net Income After Taxes1991–2011:Q3 ($ Millions)
$1
4,1
78
$5
,84
0
$1
9,3
16
$1
0,8
70
$2
0,5
98
$2
4,4
04 $
36
,81
9
$3
0,7
73
$2
1,8
65
$3
,04
6
$3
0,0
29
$6
2,4
96
$3
,04
3
$3
4,6
70
$7
,97
9
$2
8,6
72
-$6,970
$6
5,7
77
$4
4,1
55
$2
0,5
59
$3
8,5
01
-$10,000
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
$70,000
$80,000
91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11*
2005 ROE*= 9.6% 2006 ROE = 12.7% 2007 ROE = 10.9% 2008 ROE = 0.1% 2009 ROE = 5.0% 2010 ROE = 5.6% 2011:Q3 ROAS1 = 1.9%
P-C Industry 2011:Q3 profits were down 71% to $8.0B vs. 2010:Q3,
due primarily to high catastrophe losses and as non-cat
underwriting results deteriorated
* ROE figures are GAAP; 1Return on avg. surplus. Excluding Mortgage & Financial Guaranty insurers yields a 3.0% ROAS for 2011:Q3, 7.5% for 2010 and 7.4% for 2009.Sources: A.M. Best, ISO, Insurance Information Institute 40
A 100 Combined Ratio Isn’t What ItOnce Was: Investment Impact on ROEs
Combined Ratio / ROE
* 2008 -2010 figures are return on average surplus and exclude mortgage and financial guaranty insurers. 2011-12 combined ratios are A.M. Best estimate excl. M&FG insurers. Source: Insurance Information Institute from A.M. Best and ISO data.
97.5
100.6 100.1 100.8
92.7
101.099.3
100.8102.0
107.5
95.7
6.1%
3.9%
7.5%7.4%4.4%
9.6%
15.9%
14.3%
12.7% 10.9%
8.8%
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
1978 1979 2003 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011E 2012F0%
3%
6%
9%
12%
15%
18%
Combined Ratio ROE*
Combined Ratios Must Be Lower in Today’s DepressedInvestment Environment to Generate Risk Appropriate ROEs
A combined ratio of about 100 generated ~7.5% ROE in 2009/10,
10% in 2005 and 16% in 1979
41
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
*1
2
Profitability Peaks & Troughs in the P/C Insurance Industry, 1975 – 2012F*
*Profitability = P/C insurer ROEs. 2011-12 figures are A.M. Best estimates. Note: Data for 2008-2012 exclude mortgage and financial guaranty insurers. For 2011:Q3 ROAS = 1.9% including M&FG.Source: Insurance Information Institute; NAIC, ISO, A.M. Best.
1977:19.0% 1987:17.3%
1997:11.6%2006:12.7%
1984: 1.8% 1992: 4.5% 2001: -1.2%
10 Years
10 Years9 Years
2012F: 6.1%*
History suggests next ROE peak will be in 2016-2017
ROE
1975: 2.4%
2011E: 3.9%
42
Financial Strength & Capacity
43
The P-C IndustryHas Weathered the Storm Well
P/C Insurer Impairments, 1969–20118
15
12
71
19
34
91
31
21
99
16
14
13
36
49
31 3
45
04
85
56
05
84
12
91
61
23
11
8 19
49 50
47
35
18
14 15 16 1
9 21
28
5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
Source: A.M. Best Special Report “1969-2011 Impairment Review,” January 23, 2012; Insurance Information Institute.
The Number of Impairments Varies Significantly Over the P/C Insurance Cycle, With Peaks Occurring Well into Hard Markets
3 small Missouri insurers did encounter problems in 2011 after the May tornado in Joplin. They
were absorbed by a larger insurer and all claims were paid.
44
45
P/C Insurer Impairment Frequency vs. Combined Ratio, 1969-2011
90
95
100
105
110
115
1206
97
07
17
27
37
47
57
67
77
87
98
08
18
28
38
48
58
68
78
88
99
09
19
29
39
49
59
69
79
89
90
00
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
91
01
1
Co
mb
ine
d R
ati
o
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
Imp
airm
en
t Ra
te
Combined Ratio after Div P/C Impairment Frequency
Source: A.M. Best; Insurance Information Institute
2011 impairment rate was 0.91%, up from 0.67% in 2010; the rate is slightly higher than the 0.82% average since 1969
Impairment Rates Are Highly Correlated With Underwriting Performance and Reached Record Lows in 2007; Recent Increase Was Associated
Primarily With Mortgage and Financial Guaranty Insurers and Not Representative of the Industry Overall
46
Reasons for US P/C Insurer Impairments, 1969–2010
3.6%4.0%
8.6%
7.3%
7.8%
7.1%
7.8%13.6%
40.3%
Source: A.M. Best: 1969-2010 Impairment Review, Special Report, April 2011.
Historically, Deficient Loss Reserves and Inadequate Pricing AreBy Far the Leading Cause of P-C Insurer Impairments.
Investment and Catastrophe Losses Play a Much Smaller Role
Deficient Loss Reserves/Inadequate Pricing
Reinsurance Failure
Rapid GrowthAlleged Fraud
Catastrophe Losses
Affiliate Impairment
Investment Problems (Overstatement of Assets)
Misc.
Sig. Change in Business
47
Top 10 Lines of Business for US P/C Impaired Insurers, 2000–2010
2.0%4.4%
4.8%
6.5%
6.9%
7.7%
8.1%
10.9%
22.2%
26.6%
Source: A.M. Best: 1969-2010 Impairment Review, Special Report, April 2011.
Workers Comp and Pvt. Passenger Auto Account for Nearly Half of the Premium Volume of Impaired Insurers Over the Past Decade
Workers Comp
Financial Guaranty
Pvt. Passenger Auto
Homeowners
Commercial Multiperil
Commercial Auto Liability
Other Liability
Med Mal
SuretyTitle
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
$400
$450
$500
$550
75 77 79 81 83 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09*
US Policyholder Surplus:1975–2009:Q3*
* As of 9/30/09Source: A.M. Best, ISO, Insurance Information Institute.
“Surplus” is a measure of underwriting capacity. It is
analogous to “Owners Equity” or “Net Worth” in
non-insurance organizations
($ Billions)
The Premium-to-Surplus Ratio Stood at $0.87:$1 as of9/30/09, Up from Near Record Low of $0.85:$1 at Year-End 2007
Surplus as of 9/30/09 was $490.8B, up from $437.1B as of 3/31/09. Recent peak was $521.8 as of 9/30/07. Surplus as of 9/30/09 is now only 5.9% below 2007 peak; Crisis trough was as of
3/31/0916.2% below 2007 peak.
49
Policyholder Surplus, 2006:Q4–2011:Q3
Source: ISO; A.M .Best.
($ Billions)
$487.1$496.6
$512.8$521.8
$478.5
$455.6
$437.1
$463.0
$490.8
$511.5
$540.7$530.5
$544.8
$556.9 $559.1
$538.6
$564.7
$505.0$515.6$517.9
$420
$440
$460
$480
$500
$520
$540
$560
$580
06:Q4 07:Q1 07:Q2 07:Q3 07:Q4 08:Q1 08:Q2 08:Q3 08:Q4 09:Q1 09:Q2 09:Q3 09:Q4 10:Q1 10:Q2 10:Q3 10:Q4 11:Q1 11:Q2 11:Q3
2007:Q3 = previous surplus peak
Quarterly Surplus Changes Since 2011:Q1 Peak11:Q2: -$5.6B (-1.0%)
11:Q3: -$26.1B (-4.6%)
Surplus as of 9/30/11 was down 4.6% below its all
time record high of $564.7B set as of 3/31/11. Further
declines are possible
Note: Beginning in 2010:Q1 figures include $22.5B of paid-in capital from a holding company parent to a subsidiary insurer. It was a single investment in a non-insurance business.
The industry now has $1 of surplus for every $0.83 of NPW, close to the strongest claims-
paying status in its history
Investment Performance
50
Weak Investment ResultsAre a Main Cause of Low Profits
P/C Insurance Industry Investment Gain: 1994–2011:Q31
$35.4
$42.8$47.2
$52.3
$44.4
$36.0
$45.3$48.9
$59.4$55.7
$64.0
$31.7
$39.2
$52.9
$42.0
$58.0
$51.9$56.9
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05* 06 07 08 09 10 11:3Q
Investment gains recovered significantly in 2010 due to realized capital gains. The financial crisis caused investment gains to fall by 50% in 2008
1Investment gains consist primarily of interest, stock dividends and realized capital gains and losses.*2005 figure includes special one-time dividend of $3.2B.Sources: ISO; Insurance Information Institute.
($ Billions)
Investment gains at 2011:3Q were about
$2.1 billion better than the same period in 2010
51
52
P/C Insurer Net Realized Capital Gains/Losses, 1990-2011E
*2011 is an estimate based on annualized actual 2011 9-month figure of $5.5B.Sources: A.M. Best, ISO, Insurance Information Institute.
$2.8
8
$4.8
1 $9.8
9
$9.8
2
$10.
81 $18.
02
$13.
02
$16.
21
$6.6
3
-$1.
21
$6.6
1
$9.1
3
$9.7
0
$3.5
2 $8.9
2
-$7.
98
-$5.
70
$7.3
0
-$19
.81
$9.2
4
$6.0
0
$1.6
6
-$25
-$20
-$15
-$10
-$5
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11E*
Insurers Posted Net Realized Capital Gains in 2011 for the First Time Since 2007. Realized Capital Losses Were the Primary Cause
of 2008/2009’s Large Drop in Profits and ROE
($ Billions)$11.2B positive swing
52
53
2011: Nowhere to Run, Nowhere to Hide
Most of the Country East of the Rockies Suffered Severe Weather in 2011, Impacting
Most Insurers
53
Number of Federal Disaster Declarations, 1953-2012*
13 1
7 18
16
16
7 71
21
22
22
02
52
51
11
11
92
91
71
74
84
64
63
83
02
2 25
42
23
15
24
21
34
27 28
23
11
31
38
45
32 3
63
27
54
46
55
04
54
5 49
56
69
48 5
26
37
55
98
19
98
43
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
53
55
57
59
61
63
65
67
69
71
73
75
77
79
81
83
85
87
89
91
93
95
97
99
01
03
05
07
09
11
*Through March 9, 2012. Sources: Federal Emergency Management Administration at http://www.fema.gov/news/disaster_totals_annual.fema ; Insurance Information Institute.
There have been 2,057* federal disaster declarations since 1953.Note that 2005 was a relatively low year for number of disaster
declarations in the 1996-2010 period,but that year included Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, and Wilma.
The number of federal disaster declarations set
a new record in 2011.
From 1953-71, the average number of declarations
per year was 16.5.
The average number from
1996-2010 was 58.4.
The average number from
1972-1995 was 31.7.
55
15 Costliest World Insurance Losses, 1970-2011*
Insured Losses, 2010 Dollars,$ Billions
*Through June 20, 2011. 2011 disaster figures are estimates; Figures include federally insured flood losses, where applicable.Sources: Swiss Re sigma 1/2011; AIR Worldwide, RMS, Eqecat; Insurance Information Institute.
$14.0 $14.9 $16.3$20.5 $20.8 $23.1 $24.9
$35.0
$72.3
$11.3$10.0$9.3$9.0$8.0$8.0
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
$80
ChileQuake(2010)
Hugo (1989)
TyphoonMirielle(1991)
Charley(2004)
NewZealandQuake(2011)
Rita (2005)
Wilma(2005)
Ivan (2004)
SpringTornadoes
(2011)
Ike (2008)
Northridge(1994)
WTCTerrorAttack(2001)
Andrew(1992)
JapanQuake,
Tsunami(2011)*
Katrina(2005)
Taken as a single event, the Spring 2011 tornado season
would be the 7th costliest event in global insurance
history
3 of the 11 most expensive
catastrophes in world history occurred in the past 9 months
56
$8.3
$7.4
$2.6
$10.
1
$8.3
$4.6
$26.
5
$5.9 $1
2.9
$27.
5
$61.
9
$9.2
$6.7
$27.
1
$10.
6
$13.
6 $24.
0
$7.5
$2.7
$4.7
$22.
9
$5.5
$16.
9
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11*
US Insured Catastrophe Losses
*First three quarters of 2011 (est).Note: 2001 figure includes $20.3B for 9/11 losses reported through 12/31/01. Includes only business and personal property claims, business interruption and auto claims. Non-prop/BI losses = $12.2B.Sources: Property Claims Service/ISO; Munich Re; Insurance Information Institute.
First half 2011 US CAT losses exceeded losses from all of 2010. Even modest fourth quarter losses will put 2011 among the worst ever for CATs
CAT Losses Surged on Near- Record Tornado
Activity
($ Billions)2000s: A Decade of Disaster
2001-2010: $202B (up 122%)
1991-2000: $91B
58
Federal Disaster Declarationsin New England States, 1953 – 2012*
86
3933
28 27
179
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
TX ME VT NH MA CT RI
Dis
aste
r Dec
lara
tions
*Through Feb. 26, 2012.
Source: FEMA: http://www.fema.gov/news/disaster_totals_annual.fema; Insurance Information Institute.
Over the past nearly 60 years, Texas has had the
highest number of Federal Disaster Declarations
U.S. Tornado Count, 2005-2011
60Source: http://www.spc.noaa.gov/wcm/
There were 1,893 tornadoes in the US in 2011 far above
average, but well below 2008’srecord
Deadly and costly April/ May spike
Location of Tornadoes in the US, 2011
Source: NOAA Storm Prediction Center; http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/online/monthly/2011_annual_summary.html# 61
1,894 tornadoes killed 552 people in 2011, including
at least 340 on April 26 mostly in the Tuscaloosa area, and 130 in
Joplin on May 22
Location of Large Hail Reports in the US, 2011
Source: NOAA Storm Prediction Center; http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/online/monthly/2011_annual_summary.html# 62
There were 9,417 “Large Hail”
reports in 2011, causing extensive damage to homes,
businesses and vehicles
Location of Wind Damage Reports in the US, 2011
Source: NOAA Storm Prediction Center; http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/online/monthly/2011_annual_summary.html# 63
There were 18,685 “Wind Damage” reports through Dec. 27, causing
extensive damage to homes and,
businesses
Severe Weather Reports, 2011
64Source: NOAA Storm Prediction Center; http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/online/monthly/2011_annual_summary.html#
There were 29,996 severe
weather reports in 2011;
including 1,894 tornadoes;
9,417 “Large Hail” reports
and 18,685 high wind events
65
Economics 2012:
The World Is Changing2012 Is the First Year Since 2005 Where Economic Perceptions and Reality in the US Will Be Positive
Potentially Enormous Benefits for P/C Insurers
65
66
Economic Outlook for 2012 Economic Growth Will Accelerate Modestly in 2012/13, Beating Expectations
No Double Dip Recession Economy remains more resilient than most pundits presume
Consumer Confidence Will Continue to Improve Consumer Spending/Investment Will Continue to Expand Consumer and Business Lending Continue to Expand Housing Market Remains Weak, but Some Improvement Expected in 2012 Inflation Remains Tame
Runaway inflation highly unlikely but energy spike possible; Fed has things under control Private Sector Hiring Remains Consistently Positive, Exceeds Expectations
Unemployment dips below 8% by year’s end Sovereign Debt, Euro Currency/Economy, Muni Bond “Crises” Overblown European Recession is Milder than Commonly Presumed Soft Landing in China Higher Oil Prices and Current Middle East Turmoil Pose Greater Risk to US Economy
than in 2011 Interest Rates Remain Low by Historical Standards; Edge Up by Year’s End Political Environment Is More Hospitable to Business Interests
67
1.P/C Insurance Exposures Grow Robustly Personal and commercial exposure growth is certain
in 2012; Strongest since 2004 But restoration of destroyed exposure will take until
mid-decade
2.P/C Industry Growth in 2012 Will Be Strongest Since 2004 Growth likely to exceed A.M. Best projection of +3.8%
for 2012 No traditional “hard market” emerges in 2012
3.Underwriting Fundamentals Deteriorate Modestly Some pressure from claim frequency, in some
severity in key lines
7 Insurance P/C Industry Predictionsfor 2012
68
4. Increasing Private Sector Hiring Will Drive Payrolls/WC Exposures Wage growth is also positive and could modestly accelerate WC will prove to be tough to fix from an underwriting perspective
5. Increase in Demand for Commercial Insurance Will Accelerate in 2012 Includes workers comp, property, marine, many liability coverages Laggards: inland marine, aviation, commercial auto, surety Personal Lines: Auto leads, homeowners lags (though HO leads in
NPW growth due to rates)
6. Investment Environment Is/Remains Much More Favorable Return of realized capital gains as a profit driver
7. Industry Capacity Hits a New Record by Year-End 2012 (Barring Mega-CAT)
7 Insurance P/C Industry Predictionsfor 2012
69
10 Greatest Potential Threatsto the Global Economy as of March 2012
1. Conflict in the Middle East, Disrupting Oil Markets A conflict between Iran and Israel viewed by some as imminent $200/bbl oil is possible; Severe supply disruptions Resultserious damage to the global economy, killing fragile
recovery
2. Rising Oil Prices Even in the absence of conflict, oil prices slowing growth Sustained $10/bbl increase -0.2% on global GDP in Year 1; -0.5%
Year 2
3. Sovereign Debt Concerns in Europe (was #1 threat in 2011) Contagion spreads beyond GreeceItaly, Spain, Portugal, etc. Greek/EU political/economic solution fails resulting in disorderly
default
4. “Hard Landing” of Chinese Economy A sharp decline in China’s GDP would damage global economies
70
10 Greatest Potential Threatsto the Global Economy as of March 2012
5. Mega-Catastrophe Trends Continue at Record Pace Catastrophes trimmed 0.5% off global GDP in 2011 Massive disruptions to fragile global supply chains
6. Sudden Weakening of US Economy
7. Intensification of Geopolitical Instability (esp. in Middle East)
8. Disintegration of Eurozone (Political Failure)
9. Commodity Price Inflation (apart from oil)
10.Large-Scale Cyber Attack/Terrorism Attack (including cyberterror)
www.iii.org
Thank you for your timeand your attention!
Insurance Information Institute Online: