Overview - Amazon Simple Storage Service · glucon o-lactone HMP shunt 18FDG ... -Reduced level of...
Transcript of Overview - Amazon Simple Storage Service · glucon o-lactone HMP shunt 18FDG ... -Reduced level of...
1
Austin Health Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy
Dr. Aurora Poon
Nuclear Medicine Physician
PET in Rectal Cancer Management
Austin Health Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy
1. What is PET – 18F-FDG vs 68Ga-DOTATATE
2. The incidentalomas
3. Staging TNM
4. Therapy monitoring
5. Restaging / Recurrence
6. Short falls
Overview
2
Austin Health Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy
1. What is PET – 18F-FDG
2. The incidentalomas
3. Staging TNM
4. Therapy monitoring
5. Restaging / Recurrence
6. Short falls
Overview
Austin Health Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy
Positron Emission Tomography (PET)
- Imaging modality based on detecting radiation
emitted from positron emitters i.e. 15O, 11C, 13N,
18F, 68Ga & 124I
- Radionuclides -bound to biochemical tracers are
used to study diverse pathologic processes e.g.
blood flow and metabolism
3
Austin Health Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy
PET in Oncology- Malignant cells have enhanced aerobic glycolysis
(Warburg et al, 1930)
- Malignant cells develop significant alteration in
metabolism with:
Increased
• Glycolysis
• Amino acid use
• DNA synthesis
• Somatostatin receptor expression
• Prostatic specific membrane antigen
expression
These provide the biochemical basis of PET imaging
Austin Health Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy
Glucose
transporter
protein
K3
K4
Hexokinase
Tumor Cell
Glucose-6-
phosphatase
18FDG-1-P
Glycogen
18F-fru-6-P
Glycolysis
18FDG-
6-
phosph
o-
glucon
o-
lactone
HMP
shunt
18FDG
Vascular
K1
K2
18FDG 18FDG-6P
18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose 18F-FDG
– glucose analogue, distributed in vivo & transported
into cells like glucose BUT not metabolised
4
Austin Health Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy
Mechanism of increased 18F-FDG uptake in cancer cells
- Increased expression of glucose transporter
molecules at the tumour surface
- Increased levels/activity of hexokinase
- Reduced level of glucose-6-phosphatase vs most
normal tissues
- Strong correlation b/n no. of viable cells and uptake
(higher 18F-FDG uptake in viable tumour than
necrotic tumour)
Austin Health Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy
5
Austin Health Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy
18F +
-
p
c
c
Annihilation reaction
ring detector
Patient
PET/CT
Austin Health Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy
1. What is PET – 18F-FDG
2. The incidentalomas
3. Staging TNM
4. Therapy monitoring
5. Restaging / Recurrence
6. Short falls
Overview
6
Austin Health Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy
Incidental focal 18F-FDG uptake in large bowel
- Prevalence of incidental focal colorectal
uptake ~0.4-9.5%
- Prevalence of malignancy
~8-32%
- Prevalence of pre malignancy
21-83%
- 85/2916 patients (3%) in 2005-6 Austin Hospital
98% with endoscopic follow-up, 75% with either
colorectal cancer or adenoma
Hess 2014, Soltau 2017
Lee ST et al Mol Imaging Biol 2008 10(1):48-53
Austin Health Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy
Low grade villous
adenoma
High grade villous
tubular adenomaCarcinoma
Ix for PMRStaging for urotheial ca staging for NSCLC
7
Austin Health Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy
- Dose uptake ratio
5% of 7318 pts had incidental colorectal uptake
242/404 foci with endoscopic follow up
- 10% adenocarcinoma
- 37% adenoma
- 53% other benign lesions
- SUV in malignancies higher than benign lesionsF. B. Hoeij et al EJNMMI 2015, 42(1) 66-71
Standardised Uptake Value (SUV)
Austin Health Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy
1. What is PET – 18F-FDG
2. The incidentalomas
3. Staging TNM
4. Therapy monitoring
5. Restaging / Recurrence
6. Short falls
Overview
8
Austin Health Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy
Staging T and N
T staging
- Conventional Imaging- Overall accuracy ~80%
- MRI 66-95%
- 18F-FDG PET/CT- Limited by spatial
resolution
- Inability to distinguish
layers of the wall
N staging
- Conventional Imaging- Overall Sn 55-65%
- MRI 63-95%
- 18F-FDG PET/CT- Limited by spatial
resolution
- Overall Sn/Sp ~
43%/88%
Chowdhury 2010, Lu 2012
review, meta-analysis
-18F-FDG PET does not replace conventional imaging
Austin Health Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy
53 yo man with locally advanced rectal carcinoma
- Small right peri-rectal nodal metastasis
- Size matters, but tumour metabolism also important
9
Austin Health Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy
- Meta-analysis of 18 studies
in 1059 pts with colorectal
cancer and hepatic
metastases
- 18F-FDG PET is highly
accurate for detection of liver
metastases in per pt basis
- 18F-FDG PET is less
sensitive than MRI but more
specific
- 18F-FDG PET/CT changes
management in ~ 24% pt
Modality SensitivitySpecificity
per patient
CT 84-98% 70-95%
MRI 88-100% 70-93%
PET:
PET/CT 93-97% 81-97%
Per lesion
CT 69-80% 67%
MRI 80-89% 81%
PET:
PET/CT 60-81% 79-86%
Meffione et al EJNMMI 2015 42 (1) 152:163
M Staging
Austin Health Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy
Comparison 18F-FDG PET/ multiphase CT and intraoperative ultrasound for detection
of hepatic metastases.- 131 pts selected for hepatic resection of
colorectal liver metastases:
- 363 liver metastases identified
- Sensitivity for detection:
- -63 lesions < 10 mm CT PET 16%
- 172 lesions 10-20 mm CT 72% PET 75%
- 128 lesions > 20 mm CT 97% PET 95%
- All CT 71% PET 72%
- Both CT and 18F-FDG PET missed ~ 30% smaller
lesions resulting in change in management in 7% of
patients Wiering B et al. Ann Surg Oncol 2007:14(2):818-26
10
Austin Health Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy
Impact of 18F-FDG PET in the management of pts with colorectal hepatic metastases
Meta-analysisPooled sensitivity and specificity of 18F-FDG PET
and CT from studies in patients evaluated for hepatic resection:
Hepatic metastases:
Sensitivity : PET 88% CT 82%
Specificity: PET 96% CT 84%
Extra-hepatic metastases:
Sensitivity: PET 91% CT 61%
Specificity: PET 95% CT 91%
Change in management : ~31% ( 20-58%)
Wiering B et al. Cancer 2005; 104:2658-2670
Austin Health Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy
Metastatic Rectal Cancer
- Good overview of disease burden
11
Austin Health Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy
63 yo woman with metastatic multifocal colorectal cancer
Extensive retroperitoneal, mediastinal and
supraclavicular nodal metastases, hepatic metastases
and likely lymphangitis
Austin Health Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy
1. What is PET – 18F-FDG
2. The incidentalomas
3. Staging TNM
4. Therapy monitoring
5. Restaging / Recurrence
6. Short falls
Overview
12
Austin Health Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy
Therapeutic Monitoring
- FDG PET/CT is standard of care in patient
receiving radiotherapy +/- concurrent
chemotherapy for rectal cancer
- Useful in high risk patients and patients with
metastatic disease
Austin Health Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy
81 yo man with synchronous sigmoid and rectal cancer post Hartmann's for obstructive symptoms.
Pre CR therapy Post CR therapy
Pre CR therapyPost CR therapy
Complete metabolic response of primary rectal cancer but
progressive hepatic metastases
13
Austin Health Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy
57 yo man with poorly differentiated rectal cancer with nodal disease on baseline staging, treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by ULAR
Restaging 18F-FDG PET – resolution of nodal disease, residual primary
rectal ca - pT3N0
Pre CRT Post CRT
Austin Health Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy
55 yo woman with low rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST)
Pre Glivec therapy Post 12 weeks Glivec therapy
18F-FDG PET imaging post Imatinib
(Glivec) therapy in GIST
- metabolic changes precede by weeks or
months before significant decrease in
tumour size on CT
- metabolic responses seen on 18F-FDG
PET have been shown to correlate with
progress free survival
(Fuster D et al. 2011, Quart JNMMI )
Pre Glivec
4/52 post Glivec
Van den Abbeele The Oncologist 2008
14
Austin Health Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy
1. What is PET – 18F-FDG
2. The incidentalomas
3. Staging TNM
4. Therapy monitoring
5. Restaging / Recurrence
6. Short falls
Overview
Austin Health Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy
Recurrence
Studies number Sn Sp PPV NPV
Overall ( suspected rectal recurrence on CT)
Votrubova 2006(PET/CT)
Fiocchi 2010 (PET/CT)
60-84 89-93% 69-92% 50% 97%
CEA-based regimen (elevated CEA and normal/equivocal CT)
Chowdhury 2010 (PET)
Gade 2015 (PET/CT)
22-103 67-86% 82-95% 89-94% 95-100%
Presacral mass ( suspected pelvic recurrence)
Even-Sapir 2004 (PET/CT) 62 100% 96% 88% 100%
15
Austin Health Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy
53 yo man with recurrent rectal cancer-anterior resection in1999 followed by chemotherapy- recurrence 2015 – redo anterior resection- 2017 with rising CEA
Pre XRT 2012
Local recurrence
2015
Presacral rec 17
Biopsy confirmed
new colonic ca
arising from TVA
and presacral rec
Austin Health Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy
1. What is PET – 18F-FDG
2. The incidentalomas
3. Staging TNM
4. Therapy monitoring
5. Restaging / Recurrence
6. Short falls
Overview
16
Austin Health Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy
Shortfall of 18F-FDG PET
- Physiological bowel uptake may be intense,
especially in diabetic patients on metformin and at
anorectal junction
- Benign tubulovillous adenoma can have similar
FDG uptake to malignant lesions
- Infection/inflammation can be associated with
increased FDG uptake
- Some mucinous adenocarcinoma are not FDG
avid
- Poor spatial resolution for T and N staging.
Austin Health Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy
Chronic pre sacral collection
Nov 2014
July 2016
Feb 2017
July 2017
Physiological large bowel 18F-FDG uptake
17
Austin Health Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy
68Ga DOTATATE PET
- Somatostatin analogue conjugated to a
positron emitting isotope 68Ga
- Reflects somatostatin receptor density
(highest affinity for SSTR-2)
- Higher resolution and better target to
background ratio when compared to 111Indium labelled octreotide
SPECT/CT
- More accessible than 111In octreotide in
Australia
Austin Health Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy
65 year old man with poorly differentiated large cell neuroendocrine tumour of the rectum
- Primary rectal
tumour uptake is low
(poorly differentiated)
- Extensive nodal
and bone
metastases
- Useful when
combined with 18F-
FDG PET
18
Austin Health Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy
PET MRI – is that the future?
- Attenuation correction with MRI still requires
optimisation
- Many patients may not tolerate long
procedure
- No medicare funding – more research/data
collection required.
Austin Health Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy
Thank you
19
Austin Health Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy
PET tracers in tumour imaging
Increased aerobic and anaerobic glycolysis c.f.
most normal tissue 18F-FDG
Increased rate of growth 11C-thymidine
Increased rate of protein synthesis 11C-
methionine
Physiological alterations in tumour & PET tracers :
Austin Health Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy
Detection of Extra Hepatic Metastases
- 155 patients analysed by sites of lesions:
- Sensitivity of PET > CT for all locations
except for the lungs where the two
modalities are equivalent
- FDG PET particularly helpful for abdomen,
pelvis and retroperitoneum
- Specificity: FDG PET > CT at all sites except
for retroperitoneum.
Valk PE et al. Arch Surg 1999:134:503-511