Ovarian cancer

14
Ovarian Cancer JoAnn H. Eriksson and Janet Ruth Walczak I T IS ESTIMATED that in 1990 there will be 20,500 new cases of ovarian cancer and 12,400 deaths from ovarian cancer in the United States. The virulent behavior of ovarian cancer is demonstrated by the fact that it is the leading cause of death due to gynecologic cancer (47%) while accounting for only 23% of all gynecologic malig- nancies . It is the fifth leading cause of cancerdeath among women in the United States’ and a leading cause of death in women in all industrialized coun- tries except Japan. One out of every 71 women in the United Stateswill develop ovarian cancer.’ Malignant neoplasms of the ovary can occur at any age. Throughout childhood and adolescence, germ cell tumors of the ovary are a leading cause of cancer death. Epithelial ovarian cancer occurs most commonly in women more than 50 years of age, with the peak incidence betweenthe agesof 55 and 59 years.3 Despite advances in the staging and treatmentof ovarian cancer, most women will not be cured by initial standard therapy. A woman with progres- sive ovarian cancer will have repeated episodes of intestinal obstruction asthe tumor spreads through- out the abdominal cavity and over the surface of the bowel, resulting in inanition, malnutrition, and death. The inability to determine the causeof the disease, to detectthe disease early, to reduce mor- tality rates through effective therapy, and to elim- inate suffering from advanced disease makes ovar- ian cancer a major challenge to all health professionals. A majority of ovarian cancersare epithelial in origin, yet the nonepithelial cancers, particularly From the Rush Presbyterian, St Lukes Medical Center and Rush University, Chicago, IL; and The Johns Hopkins Oncol- ogy Center, Baltimore, MD. JoAnn H. Eriksson, RN, MS: Clinical Nurse Specialist, Gy- necologic Oncology, Rush Presbyterian, St Lukes Medical Cen- ter, and Assistant Professor, College of Nursing, Rush Univer- sity, Chicago, IL; Janet Ruth Walczak, RN, MSN: Clinical Nurse Specialist, Gynecologic Oncology, The Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, Baltimore, MD. Address reprint requests to Janet Ruth Walczak, RN, MSN, The Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, Room 163, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205. 0 1990 W.B. Saunders Company. 0749-2081/90l0403-0006$05.00i0 germ cell and stromal tumors, comprise a distinct and important group in terms of origin, incidence, and treatment. This article discusses epithelial ovarian cancer, the nonepithelial germ cell and stromal tumors, and the overall nursing manage- ment of patients with ovarian cancer. EPITHELIAL OVARIAN CANCER Epidemiology Epithelial ovarian cancers account for 85% to 90% of all ovarian cancers seen in the United States.Epidemiologic studies to evaluate risk fac- tors for epithelial ovarian cancer indicate that nulliparous and low parity women have a higher incidence of ovarian cancer.4The risk of ovarian cancer correlates with the time in a woman’s life when ovulation is not suppressed by pregnancy, lactation, or oral contraceptives.5These observa- tions support the theory that the ovarian epithelial surfacemay be sensitive to the chronic irritation of “incessant ovulation. ’ ‘6 When ovulation is sup- pressedby pregnancy and the use of oral contra- ceptives, gonadotropin levels are low. Gonadotro- pin levels are high during the postmenopausal years and may account for the increasedincidence of ovarian cancerin women over 45 years of age.7 Environmental factors are suspected as risk fac- tors since the highest incidence of ovarian cancer occurs in industrialized countries with the excep- tion of Japan. Japanese immigrants to the United States have an increased rate of ovarian cancerthat approaches the rate for white women by the second generation.* Women with higher education, which is correlatedwith higher income and differencesin childbearing practices and dietary habits, have a higher incidence of ovarian cancer.3Y5 Studies regarding dietary fat as a risk factor in ovarian cancer report contradictory findings. The consumptionof animal fat as a risk factor has been reported by some investigators, but not by others. 8,9 Consumptionof cigarettes,alcohol, and/ or coffee have not been associated with an in- creased risk of ovarian cancer.8*9 The migration of industrial by-products, such as talc, from the vagina via retrograde flow through the reproductive tract to the peritoneal cavity may accountfor the exposureof the ovaries to carcino- 214 .%minars in Oncology Nursing, Vol 6, No 3 (August), 1990: pp 214-227

Transcript of Ovarian cancer

Ovarian Cancer

JoAnn H. Eriksson and Janet Ruth Walczak

I T IS ESTIMATED that in 1990 there will be 20,500 new cases of ovarian cancer and

12,400 deaths from ovarian cancer in the United States. The virulent behavior of ovarian cancer is demonstrated by the fact that it is the leading cause of death due to gynecologic cancer (47%) while accounting for only 23% of all gynecologic malig- nancies . It is the fifth leading cause of cancer death among women in the United States’ and a leading cause of death in women in all industrialized coun- tries except Japan. One out of every 71 women in the United States will develop ovarian cancer.’

Malignant neoplasms of the ovary can occur at any age. Throughout childhood and adolescence, germ cell tumors of the ovary are a leading cause of cancer death. Epithelial ovarian cancer occurs most commonly in women more than 50 years of age, with the peak incidence between the ages of 55 and 59 years.3

Despite advances in the staging and treatment of ovarian cancer, most women will not be cured by initial standard therapy. A woman with progres- sive ovarian cancer will have repeated episodes of intestinal obstruction as the tumor spreads through- out the abdominal cavity and over the surface of the bowel, resulting in inanition, malnutrition, and death. The inability to determine the cause of the disease, to detect the disease early, to reduce mor- tality rates through effective therapy, and to elim- inate suffering from advanced disease makes ovar- ian cancer a major challenge to all health professionals.

A majority of ovarian cancers are epithelial in origin, yet the nonepithelial cancers, particularly

From the Rush Presbyterian, St Lukes Medical Center and Rush University, Chicago, IL; and The Johns Hopkins Oncol- ogy Center, Baltimore, MD.

JoAnn H. Eriksson, RN, MS: Clinical Nurse Specialist, Gy- necologic Oncology, Rush Presbyterian, St Lukes Medical Cen- ter, and Assistant Professor, College of Nursing, Rush Univer- sity, Chicago, IL; Janet Ruth Walczak, RN, MSN: Clinical Nurse Specialist, Gynecologic Oncology, The Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, Baltimore, MD.

Address reprint requests to Janet Ruth Walczak, RN, MSN, The Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, Room 163, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205.

0 1990 W.B. Saunders Company. 0749-2081/90l0403-0006$05.00i0

germ cell and stromal tumors, comprise a distinct and important group in terms of origin, incidence, and treatment. This article discusses epithelial ovarian cancer, the nonepithelial germ cell and stromal tumors, and the overall nursing manage- ment of patients with ovarian cancer.

EPITHELIAL OVARIAN CANCER

Epidemiology

Epithelial ovarian cancers account for 85% to 90% of all ovarian cancers seen in the United States. Epidemiologic studies to evaluate risk fac- tors for epithelial ovarian cancer indicate that nulliparous and low parity women have a higher incidence of ovarian cancer.4 The risk of ovarian cancer correlates with the time in a woman’s life when ovulation is not suppressed by pregnancy, lactation, or oral contraceptives.5 These observa- tions support the theory that the ovarian epithelial surface may be sensitive to the chronic irritation of “incessant ovulation. ’ ‘6 When ovulation is sup- pressed by pregnancy and the use of oral contra- ceptives, gonadotropin levels are low. Gonadotro- pin levels are high during the postmenopausal years and may account for the increased incidence of ovarian cancer in women over 45 years of age.7

Environmental factors are suspected as risk fac- tors since the highest incidence of ovarian cancer occurs in industrialized countries with the excep- tion of Japan. Japanese immigrants to the United States have an increased rate of ovarian cancer that approaches the rate for white women by the second generation.* Women with higher education, which is correlated with higher income and differences in childbearing practices and dietary habits, have a higher incidence of ovarian cancer.3Y5

Studies regarding dietary fat as a risk factor in ovarian cancer report contradictory findings. The consumption of animal fat as a risk factor has been reported by some investigators, but not by others. 8,9 Consumption of cigarettes, alcohol, and/ or coffee have not been associated with an in- creased risk of ovarian cancer.8*9

The migration of industrial by-products, such as talc, from the vagina via retrograde flow through the reproductive tract to the peritoneal cavity may account for the exposure of the ovaries to carcino-

214 .%minars in Oncology Nursing, Vol 6, No 3 (August), 1990: pp 214-227

OVARIAN CANCER 215

genie agents. However, investigations of talc ex- posure revealed no significant correlation with disease. lo

Genetic and familial predisposition are factors in only a small proportion of women with ovarian cancer.6 In families in which ovarian cancer is ev- ident in two or more first-degree relatives, the first-degree relative has a threefold increase in risk. Hereditary ovarian cancer refers to a pattern of autosomal dominant segregation of ovarian can- cer in which other cancers, such as breast, endo- metrial, and colon cancer, are associated with ovarian cancer. ‘i Patients in the type A blood group also have a higher incidence of ovarian cancer. I2

Viruses have been suspected as a factor in the development of ovarian cancer. The mumps pa- rotitis virus causing asymptomatic mumps has been investigated as an etiologic agent. However, no evidence exists to incriminate this or any par- ticular virus. *

Despite the many factors associated with ovari- an cancer, no etiology has been identified. This failure to determine the cause of ovarian cancer has frustrated efforts in primary prevention and early detection of the disease.

Pathophysiology and Natural History

The epithelial cancers of the ovary are classified histologically as serous, mutinous, endometrioid, mesonephroid (clear cell), Brenner, and undiffer- entiated types. The histologic types of epithelial ovarian cancer have similar presentation and dis- semination patterns. Histologic type alone has lit- tle prognostic significance with the exception of clear cell carcinoma, which is much more aggres- sive in nature.13

Ovarian cancer originates in the ovary, grows locally, and then invades the capsule and mesova- rium. After invading the capsule, cells most com- monly exfoliate into the peritoneal cavity, where they are carried in the peritoneal fluid via the pos- terior gutters to the subdiaphragmatic surfaces. All peritoneal surfaces are potential sites for tumor im- plants. Cells may implant on the diaphragm, liver, bowels, bladder, or omentum. Cells may also enter the pleural cavities via the diaphragm and implant on the pleural surfaces. When tumor cells obstruct lymphatic channels, malignant ascites may accu- mulate. Tumor cells may also invade the uterus, fallopian tubes, and other pelvic structures by di-

rect extension or through lymphatic channels. Para-aortic lymph node involvement is common, although hematogenous spread is not. Although ovarian cancer usually remains confined to the peritoneal cavity, it may metastasize to other or- gans, such as liver, lung, and pleura.194*‘3

Ovarian cancer has been described in women whose ovaries have been previously removed.‘4,15 The explanation for such an occurrence is not clear, but it has been suggested that the coelomic epithelium may undergo neoplastic transforma- tion.

Signs and Symptoms

Ovarian cancer is a disease with no specific early symptoms. Frequently, there will be months of delay in detecting the disease because the vague symptoms of dyspepsia, abdominal discomfort, pelvic pressure, urinary frequency, and other di- gestive symptoms are dismissed as insignificant and related to personal stresses or midlife changes. Attention to these abdominal complaints as possi- ble early symptoms of ovarian cancer, especially in the nulliparous woman over 40 years of age with a negative gastrointestinal (GI) workup, may facil- itate earlier detection. Detection occurs primarily when the tumor is large enough to be palpable, or when ascites and abdominal distention develop. Other presenting symptoms include pain, dyspnea, and weight 10~s.‘~

Early Detection and Diagnosis

The pelvic examination remains an important means for detecting early ovarian cancer. A pal- pable ovary in a woman 3 or more years after menopause should suggest an ovarian neoplasm. However, only one ovarian cancer in 10,000 asymptomatic women will be detected by pelvic examination.* Currently, there is interest in eval- uating pelvic ultrasound for screening in the asymptomatic woman. ”

Diagnosis of early ovarian cancer with specific tumor-associated antigens has been investigated. Antigens such as CA-125 and NB/70K have been identified. These antigens have been found to cor- relate with the stage and amount of residual dis- ease. However, serum levels are often undetect- able in the presence of minimal residual disease. The antigens are useful in monitoring progression or recurrence of disease, but are not useful as a screening tool. ’ 8-20 Other types of immunologic

216

markers are being investigated. These include monoclonal antibodies and radiolabeled antibodies to detect metastasis, and tumor-associated antigens that act as targets for antibody-directed treatment.

Routine diagnostic tests are not particularly use- ful in the evaluation of ovarian cancer, except to rule out possible sites of origin of a pelvic mass. Ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) scans are useful in detecting a pelvic mass, but cannot differentiate between a benign and a malignant process. When pelvic masses are known to exist, these tests may help determine extent of disease, but they do not replace the need for exploratory surgery for diagnosis and staging.2*21

Paracentesis to obtain fluid for cell block and cytologic smear is not done if surgery is planned. Paracentesis could result in the puncture of a self- contained malignant cyst and cause tumor seeding along the needle tract, which would increase the stage of disease and decrease survival2

Barium enema may be performed to rule out a primary colorectal tumor with metastases to the ovary. Proctosigmoidoscopy and a GI series may be indicated in women with intestinal tract symp- toms. Chest x-ray is done to assess for pleural effusion and parenchymal metastases. Intravenous pyelogram is helpful in identifying the relationship of the ureters to the tumor and other pelvic structures. 2

Although these studies are helpful in the evalu- ation of a pelvic mass, they cannot provide a de- finitive diagnosis. Definitive diagnosis of ovarian cancer requires histologic examination of tumor tissue obtained at the time of laparotomy.

Surgery

Surgical staging and cytoreductive surgery. Surgical staging and cytoreductive surgery provide the basis for treatment of ovarian cancer. The In- ternational Federation of Gynecology and Obstet- rics (FIGO) staging system, which was revised in 1985, is the currently accepted staging system (Ta- ble 1). The staging laparotomy is performed to diagnose the malignancy and to accurately deter- mine the extent of disease (Table 2). This proce- dure consists of a systematic exploration of all peritoneal surfaces within the abdominal cavity to determine volume and distribution of the ovarian tumor. This is accomplished via a vertical midline incision from the pubis symphysis to above the

ERIKSSON AND WALCZAK

Table 1. FIG0 Shahs for Ovarian Cancer

Stage I IA

IB

IC

II

IIA

IIB IIC

Ill

IIIA

IIIB

IIIC

IV

Growth limited to the ovaries. Growth limited to one ovary; no ascites. No

tumor on the external surface; capsule intact. Growth limited to both ovaries; no ascites. No

tumor on the external surfaces; capsules intact. Tumor either stage IA or IB, but with tumor on

surface of one or both ovaries, with capsule ruptured, with ascites present containing malignant cells, or with positive peritoneal washings.

Growth involving one or both ovaries with pelvic extension.

Extension and/or metastases to the uterus and/or tubes.

Extension to other pelvic tissues. Tumor either stage IIA or IIB, but with tumor on

the surface of one or both ovaries, with capsule(s) ruptured, with ascites present containing malignant cells, or with positive peritoneal washings.

Tumor involving one or both ovaries with peritoneal implants outside the pelvis and/or positive retroperitoneal or inguinal nodes. Superficial liver metastasis equals stage Ill.

Tumor grossly limited to the true pelvis with negative nodes, but with histologically confirmed microscopic seeding of abdominal peritoneal surfaces.

Tumor of one or both ovaries with histologically confirmed implants of abdominal peritoneal surfaces, none exceeding 2 cm in diameter. Nodes are negative.

Abdominal implants greater than 2 cm in diameter and/or positive retroperitoneal or inguinal nodes.

Growth involving one or both ovaries with distant metastases. If pleural effusion is present, there must be positive cytology to allot a case to stage IV. Parenchymal liver metastasis equals stage IV.

umbilicus. Once the peritoneal cavity is entered, the presence of ascites is noted and fluid is ob- tained for cytopathology . If no fluid is present, peritoneal washings are obtained and sent for cy- topathology. All peritoneal surfaces are then care- fully examined to determine presence of disease. Attention is paid to the diaphragm, pericolic gut- ters, serosa of the bowels, pelvic sidewalls, cul- de-sac, and omentum. Multiple, selective biopsy specimens are obtained. The ovaries, if identifi- able, are inspected to determine the presence of bilaterality, tumor excrescences on the capsule, rupture, and adhesions.

A total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH), bilat- eral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO), omentectomy, selective pelvic and para-aortic lymph node sam- pling, and cytoreductive surgery is performed. The

OVARIAN CANCER 217

Table 2. Staging Laparotomy Procedure for Patients With

Ovarian Cancer

Vertical midline incision from the pubis symphysis to

above the umbilicus

Peritoneal cytology (ascitic fluid or washings) from pelvic

paracolic gutters, infradiaphragmatic area

Examination and palpation of all peritoneal surfaces

Omentectomy

Abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-

oophorectomy

Multiple selective biopsy specimens taken from cul-de-sac,

pelvic sidewalls, paracolic gutters, and diaphragm

Selective pelvic and para-aortic lymph node sampling

Cytoreductive surgery

Assessment for residual disease

goal of cytoreductive surgery is to remove all tu- mor masses greater than 1 cm in size without un- due surgical morbidity. This debulking may in- clude extensive dissection of tumor masses and the formation of a colostomy to prevent obstruction. Occasionally, in the case of a young woman who wishes to maintain fertility and has a stage IA, well-differentiated tumor or a tumor of low malig- nant potential, only the involved ovary is removed. The contralateral ovary is sampled and a complete exploration of the abdominal cavity is accom- plished. Five-year survival in this select population is comparable to that of patients in whom all re- productive organs are removed.22

Second-look laparotomy. A “second-look” laparotomy, which is a second operation for ex- ploratory purposes, is performed in patients who have had a complete clinical response to primary therapy. A negative CT scan or ultrasound and a negative CA-125 are useful in deciding who should proceed to a second-look procedure. The purposes of this procedure are to evaluate the ef- fectiveness of treatment, to determine disease sta- tus and the need for further treatment, and to de- bulk any residual tumor identified. The surgical procedure is similar to the initial staging laparoto- my in that it consists of peritoneal washings or sampling of peritoneal fluid, a systematic evalua- tion of all peritoneal surfaces, and selective, mul- tiple biopsy procedures. The impact of second- look laparotomy and secondary cytoreductive surgery on survival remains controversial. l3

Exploratory surgery may also be performed when complications develop. The most common complication is a bowel obstruction that may re- quire ostomy formation or bypass surgery.23

Prognostic Factors Important prognostic factors for women with

ovarian cancer are the stage of the disease, the amount of residual disease following initial de- bulking surgery, and the histologic grade of the tumor. Survival is associated with stage, and var- ies from 60% to 70% for stage I disease to less than 5% for stage IV disease (Table 3).2,4

The most important prognostic indicator in pa- tients with advanced ovarian cancer is the volume of residual tumor following primary surgery. An increased response to chemotherapy and signifi- cantly higher survival rates are noted in patients who are optimally resected.4

Histologic grade is another factor in determining prognosis. Patients with well-differentiated (grade 1) or moderately well-differentiated (grade 2) tu- mors have significantly higher 5-year survival rates than those with poorly differentiated (grade 3) tumors .4,7

There is a group of ovarian tumors classified as “low malignant potential.” These tumors account for approximately 15% of all ovarian tumors, tend to occur in women less than 40 years of age, and have a favorable prognosis regardless of the stage of disease.4

Treatment

The multimodality approach is essential for the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer. After initial cytoreductive surgery, treatment is based on stage, grade, and amount of residual disease (Table 4). Stage IA or IB requires no further adjunctive ther- apy. Stage IA and IB high-grade tumors, stage IC, and stage II tumors with minimal residual disease require treatment with single-agent chemotherapy, intraperitoneal chromic phosphate (P32), or com- bination chemotherapy. Stage II ovarian cancer with gross residual disease following cytoreductive surgery is treated with a cisplatin-based regimen of combination chemotherapy. Optimally resected stage III residual disease is also treated with cis- platin combination chemotherapy.

Table 3. 5-Year Survival Ratus for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

stage Survival (%I

I 60-70 II 25-45 III 12-13 IV o-4

-

218 ERIKSSON AND WALCZAK

Table 4. Treatment for Ovarian Cancer

Stage

IA or IB, grade 1

IA, IB, grade 2,3

IC

II, gross residual disease

II, Ill G 2 cm residual disease

Treatment

No further treatment

Single-agent chemotherapy

P32 or combination chemotherapy

Combination chemotherapy including cisplatin

Combination chemotherapy including cisplatin or whole abdominal pelvic radiation

Ill > 2 cm residual disease; IV

Combination chemotherapy including cisplatin

Refractory disease Chemotherapy, immunotherapy, intraperitoneal therapy, hormonal therapy

Whole abdominal and pelvic radiation therapy has been advocated for patients who are optimally resected. Survival rates for radiation therapy equal those for single agent chemotherapy; however, morbidity is significantly increased.’

Stage III with bulky residual disease and stage IV are treated with cisplatin-based multiagent che- motherapy. Hormonal manipulation is usually re- served for salvage therapy.*

Chemotherapy. Single-agent chemotherapy was considered standard treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer prior to 1976. Alkylating agents such as melphalan, cyclophosphamide, and chlo- rambucil were the first drugs used effectively against ovarian cancer. Overall response rates of 40% to 60% and survival rates of 21 to 35 months were reported.* Hexamethylmelamine, doxorubi- tin, 5-fluorouracil(5FU), and cisplatin have been found to be effective as single agents, with re- sponse rates ranging from 12% to 61%.*l In 1976, cisplatin was reported to have a response rate of 26% in pretreated patients.24 Today, cisplatin is considered the single most active drug available for the treatment of ovarian cancer. Overall re- sponse rates for platinum-based combination ther- apy are as high as 90%, with complete response rates of 40% to 50%.*

Since single-agent therapy has been of limited success in the treatment of ovarian cancer, combi- nation drug regimens have been used to treat ad- vanced disease. Act-FuCy (dactinomycin, 5-FU, and cyclophosphamide) and Hexa-CAF (hexame-

thylmelamine , cyclophosphamide , methotrexate , and 5-FU) were compared with melphalan, with statistically significant increased response and survival.* With the introduction of cisplatin into combination chemotherapeutic regimens, response rates improved significantly.25*26

Controversy exists over the effectiveness of other drugs in cisplatin-based combination regi- mens. Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin (CP), or cyclophosphamide, cisplatin with doxorubicin (CAP), are the most effective combinations pres- ently used. The Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) reported similar response, disease-free in- terval, and survival rates with CP and CAP in op- timally debulked, stage III patients.27 Several researchers**“’ found that CAP had a higher com- plete response rate (62%) than CP (39%). How- ever, survival rates were not significantly differ- ent.

Most women with ovarian cancer develop recur- rence after an initial response to chemotherapy; therefore, additional therapy is given. Second-line chemotherapy, used after failure of initial chemo- therapy, produces limited effects. Although many single agents and combination regimens, such as 5-FU, etoposide, high-dose cisplatin, hexamethyl- melamine, cisplatin, CAP, and CHAP (cyclophos- phamide, hexamethylmelamine, doxorubicin, cis- platin) have been used, the highest response rates are achieved when cisplatin is used alone or in combination with other agents. Response rates range from 22% to 72%. However, most were par- tial responses of short duration (4 to 6 months).7

Carboplatin, a cisplatin analogue, is as active as cisplatin in patients with advanced epithelial ovar- ian cancer3’ and germ cell tumors.32 Carboplatin as well as cisplatin is associated with a significant dose response; that is, the response rate is propor- tional to the dose of drug administered. It is also the most effective agent for patients previously re- sponsive to cisplatin, but who are unable to toler- ate cisplatin due to neurotoxicity or nephrotoxic- ity. Carboplatin is gaining recognition as an important drug in the treatment of ovarian can- cer. 31,33

A new investigational drug, taxol , is a diterpene plant product and antineoplastic agent which has a mechanism of action that is unique in that it is unlike other antimicrotubule agents. Tax01 has demonstrated an overall response rate of 30% in pretreated patients. Further evaluation of this drug,

OVARIAN CANCER 219

particularly in combination with cisplatin, is under way.34

Probably the newest and most experimental therapy for advanced ovarian cancer is that of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation. A variety of drugs, in- cluding cyclophosphamide, melphalan, carbopla- tin, and etoposide, have been used in limited pop- ulations of both epithelial and germ cell cancers of the ovary. Although preliminary data is promising, further investigation is needed.35”7

Zntruperifoneaf chemotherapy. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy offers an alternative to intravenous second-line therapy in patients who have minimal residual disease following second-look laparoto- my. Intraperitoneal administration of chemothera- peutic agents directly into the abdominal cavity has four advantages over intravenous chemotherapy in this select population: (1) a higher concentration of the drugs in the peritoneal cavity is obtained with intraperitoneal rather than systemic exposure, (2) drugs can be administered directly to the tumor sites, (3) systemic toxicity from the drug is mini- mized, and (4) immunoresponse in the abdominal cavity is enhanced.38,39

Administration of chemotherapeutic agents into the peritoneal cavity requires the use of a catheter. Semipermanent catheters, such as the Tenckhoff dialysis catheter or a peritoneal catheter with an implanted port, are used for multiple administra- tions. Both types have advantages and disadvan- tages. The major problem with both types of cath- eters is the formation of a fibrin sheath, causing obstruction of the outflow. Occasionally, the infu- sion of drugs may not be possible.40,41 A large intercooperative group study comparing intraperi- toneal versus intravenous administration of cispla- tin in combination with intravenous cyclophospha- mide as first-line treatment is under way for optimal stage IIl disease.42

Immunotherapy. Immunotherapeutic agents have been used in combination with chemotherapy to treat ovarian cancer. Increasing tumor cell kill by nonspecific cellular activation and increased recognition and response to specific tumor anti- gens have been tested. Initially, it was thought that Corynebacterium parvum and bacillis Calmette- Guerin (BCG) in combination with chemotherapy would show a higher response rate than treatment with chemotherapy alone. However, additional randomized trials were not able to produce the

results.43*44 Intraperitoneal administration of inter- ferons and interleukin-II have also shown promise in initial studies .45*46

Radiation therapy. Radioisotopes, P32 and ra- dioactive gold, have been widely used to treat ovarian cancer. Radioisotopes are effective in treating patients with early stage disease, with re- ported survival rates of 67% to 95% for stage I disease and 25% to 67% for stage II disease. The radioisotopes are administered into the peritoneal cavity.*

Chromic phosphate is preferred because of its longer half-life and lack of gamma irradiation. The radiation from P32 penetrates to a maximum depth of 4 to 5 mm so it is only used with microscopic disease.* Chromic phosphate is usually infused postoperatively in 500 ml normal saline into the peritoneal cavity through a catheter. The patient’s position is changed every 10 to 15 minutes to pro- mote adequate distribution of the isotope.

External beam radiotherapy is given to the whole abdomen and pelvis in selected patients with minimal residual disease. The kidney and the right lobe of the liver are shielded, usually after the maximum tolerated dose of 2,000 to 2,500 cGy and a pelvic boost of approximately 2,000 to 3,000 cGy are given. Nausea and vomiting as well as significant myelosuppression frequently interrupt and sometimes prevent completion of the full course of therapy. These effects are compounded because many of the patients have received previ- ous myelosuppressive therapy .47

Endocrine therapy. Ovarian cancer may be viewed as an endocrine-related tumor because the ovaries are a primary source of estrogen and pro- gesterone as well as a target organ for these and other hormones. Endocrine therapy consisting of progestins, antiestrogens, and other hormones has been tested.

Progestins, such as medoxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and megestrol acetate, have only a 10% to 15% objective response rate, and most responses were seen in patients with serous and endometrioid tumors.6 Progestins have been tested in combina- tion with chemotherapy, with high response rates of 76% to 85% in initial studies, but these were not replicated in prospective controlled randomized tSidS.7

Response rates of 14% to 18% were achieved with the combination of MPA and ethynylestra- diol. An increase in response was reported when

220 ERIKSSON AND WALCZAK

estrogens and progestins were administered in a simultaneous and sequential fashion.48 An objec- tive response rate of 4% was seen with tamoxifen therapy alone. However, stabilization of disease occurred in 8% to 80% of the patients. The lutein- izing hormone-releasing hormone agonist, D- Trp-6-LHRH (decapaptyl), has been used in the treatment of ovarian cancer; stabilization of dis- ease and a decrease in tumor size was noted in 50% of cases.49 It is believed that decreasing gonado- tropins may minimize the steroid output of ovarian cancer.

In studies with ovarian cancer, estrogen recep- tors are seen in 63% of patients, progesterone re- ceptors in 48%, and androgen receptors in 69% of tumors. Both estrogen and progesterone receptors are found in 36% of ovarian cancers. The presence of estrogen and progesterone receptors is a good predictor of response in endometrioid tumors.50 Other studies are needed to further define the cor- relation between hormonal receptors and response to treatment.

1-antitrypsin, and transferrin. Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is a protein produced by the fetal liver and GI tract. It is replaced by albumin as the fetus matures. Alpha-fetoprotein and alpha-4-antitrypsin reappear as certain types of germ cell tumors grow and spread. These tumors include embryonal car- cinoma and endodermal sinus tumors (yolk sac carcinoma).53 Syncytiotrophoblastic cells of the human placenta produce human chorionic gonad- otropin (HCG), a polypeptide, which disappears from fetal circulation after birth; however, HCG can be identified in syncytiotrophoblastic giant cells in germ cell tumors and can be found in the circulation as the tumor grows and spreads.52,54

The dysgerminoma is a primitive malignant germ cell tumor distinct from embryonal carci- noma. It has not differentiated to form embryonic or extraembryonic structures. It is the female coun- terpart of testicular seminoma. Dysgerminomas of- ten contain elements of other malignant germ cells.54

NONEPITHELIAL TUMORS

Nonepithelial ovarian tumors represent only 10% to 15% of all ovarian cancers and are the most common gynecologic tumors in childhood and ad- olescence. Staging of these tumors is accom- plished in the same manner as for epithelial tu- mors, using the FIG0 system (Table 1). The majority of these tumors consist of germ cell tu- mors and stromal tumors of the ovary.

Kurman et al54 proposed a classification of germ cell tumors into germinomas and embryonal carci- nomas based on their relationship with AFP and HCG (Fig 1). Embryonal carcinoma, a tumor com- posed of undifferentiated cells, is the progenitor of embryonic and extraembryonic tumors, and syn-

PRIMORDIeL GERM CELL

Germ Cell Tumors

The understanding of germ cell tumors as a group of neoplasms arising from the gonads has evolved over the last four decades. Primordial germ cells originate from cells differentiating in the caudal region of the yolk sac. They then mi- grate along the dorsal mesentery of the developing embryo into the newly forming gonads and are incorporated into the sex cords, where they de- velop into oogonia in women.51 Cells arrested dur- ing the process of migration may give rise to both benign and malignant tumors in midline sites such as the retroperitoneal and sacrococcygeal regions. However, most germ cell tumors arise from undif- ferentiated germ cells within the o~ary.~~

GERMINOMA Seminoma or Dysgerminoma

AFP (-) HCG (-)

EMBRYONAL CARCINOMA Aw (+I HCG (+)

Extraembryomc Differentiation

Embryonic Differentiation

Trophoblast Yolk Sac

f

t Immature

AFP (-) Choriocarcinoma Endodermal

AFP (-) Sinus Tumor

HGC (+) AFP (+) HGC (-)

HCG (-)

t Mature Teratoma AFP (-) HCG (-)

The human fetal yolk sac synthesizes several proteins, including albumin, prealbumin, alpha-

Fig 1. Histogenic and immunohistogenic classification of germ call tumors. AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; HCG, human cho- rionic gonadotropin. (Reprinted with permission.‘9

OVARIAN CANCER 221

thesizes both AFP and HCG, while the dysgermi- noma synthesizes neither in a majority of cases.54

The presenting symptoms in descending order of frequency include acute and chronic abdominal pain, asymptomatic mass, abnormal vaginal bleed- ing, amenorrhea, and abdominal distention.55 Ovarian germ cell tumors are usually rapidly grow- ing tumors and cause a significant amount of pain. The pain can become severe as a result of rupture or torsion of the mass. A hemoperitoneum from rupture of the capsule of the rapidly growing mass is a classic initial sign of dysgerminoma55 (Ta- ble 5).

Dysgerminoma. Dysgerminoma is the most common malignant germ cell tumor of the ovary, accounting for 3.5% of ovarian malignancies. It may occur at any age; however, the majority ap-

pear in adolescence and early adulthood (between 10 to 30 years of age). Dysgerminoma can be as- sociated with gonadal dysgenesis and a gonado- blastoma, and is the only germ cell tumor in which bilateral ovarian involvement may exist. Dysger- minomas have a predilection for lymphatic spread, although metastasis may also occur through exten- sion through the capsule and by peritoneal and vas- cular spread. Mediastinal and supraclavicular lymph node involvement, bone metastasis, and brain, liver, or lung involvement are late manifes- tations of the disease. About 25% of the patients will have metastatic disease at the time of explor- atory surgery. 52

A young patient with stage IA disease who wants to preserve fertility should have a unilateral sal- pingo-oophorectomy combined with aggressive

Table 5. Germ Cell Tumors of the Ovafl”

Type Description Tumor Markers Treatment

Dysgerminoma

Endodermal sinus tumor

Embryonal carcinoma

Chorocarcinoma

Teratoma, immature

3.5% of ovarian malignancies; highest incidence, lo-30 years of age; bilaterality can occur; spread via lymphatics, vascular channels, direct extension, and peritoneal flow; 25% metastatic at diagnosis

Second most common germ cell tumor of ovary; highest incidence in adolescents and young adults (mean age, 18 years); presenting symptom: abdominal pain in 77% of patients; characterized by rapid growth and intra-abdominal spread; survival with surgery and chemotherapy approaches 70%

4% of malignant germ cell tumors; mean age of incidence, 15 years; survival rates, 39% to 50%

Two groups: gestational and nongestational; arises as a germ cell differentiating toward trophoblastic structures; usually occurs primarily in prepubescent children but also in young women; precocious puberty in prepubescent girls; adults have signs of ectopic pregnancy

Tumor with immature or embryonal tissue arising from ectodermal, mesodermal, and endodermal germ layers; contains neuroepithelial elements; third most common germ cell tumor; usually occurs in the first two decades of life; usually unilateral

AFP - HCG -

Usually HCG - Usually AFP +

AFP + HCG +

HCG +

HCG - AFP-

Unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy if fertility desired in stage IA; TAH and BSO if tumor > 10 cm, tumor adherent to other organs, ascites present, or evidence of metastasis

If patient is pregnant, maintain pregnancy if encapsulated; TAH and BSO if tumor not encapsulated or if tumor > 10 cm

Adjuvant chemotherapy: VAC, VBP, BEP Radiation to whole abdomen and pelvis is

an option unless fertility is desired Surgical debulking followed by

combination chemotherapy: VAC, MAC, and BEP being tested; radiation not useful

Unilaterial salpingo-oophorectomy with combination chemotherapy: VAC and BEP; not radiosensitive

Surgical removal followed by combination chemotherapy MAC

Unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy; adjuvant combination chemotherapy if tumor is grade 2 or 3, ascites present, tumor ruptures, disease persistent, or recurrent; VAC, MAC, and PVB; radiation is of little value

Abbreviations: HCG, human chorionic gonadotropin; AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; VAC, vincristine, dadnomycin, and cyclophospha- mide; VBP, vinblastine, cisplatin, and bleomycin; BEP, bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin; MAC, methotrexate, dactinomycin, and cyclophosphamide; t, positive serum tumor markers; -, negative serum tumor markers.

222 ERIKSSON AN0 WALCZAK

staging. A TAH and BSO are performed when tumor is greater than 10 cm in diameter or attached to other organs, ascites is present, or there is evi- dence of metastasis. A pregnancy is left uninter- rupted if an encapsulated tumor can be removed intact. If not, TAH and BSO are recommended.52

Dysgerminomas are highly radiosensitive and whole abdominal and pelvic radiation have been used. However, conservative treatment with pres- ervation of fertility is a major consideration for the majority of patients who are young. Surgery alone for stage I disease and combination chemotherapy for higher stage disease have also produced good results. Regimens used in the treatment of dysger- minoma consist of vincristine, dactinomycin, and cyclophosphamide (VAC); vinblastine, bleomy- tin, and cisplatin (VBP); and bleomycin, etopo- side, and cisplatin (BEP).3,52*56”58

Dysgerminomas may occur in combination with gonadoblastoma, a tumor that always occurs with dysgenic gonads. Treatment in this situation re- quires bilateral oophorectomy because of the fre- quency of bilateral tumors and absence of normal ovarian function. The uterus is left intact for pos- sible future in vitro fertilization. Genotype and karyotype studies of patients are recommended, especially in patients with developmental abnor- malities or a history of virilization.3

Endodermal sinus tumor. Endodermal sinus tumor (EST) is the second most common form of malignant germ cell tumor of the ovary. It is char- acterized by rapid growth and extensive intra- abdominal spread. The presenting symptom is ab- dominal pain in approximately 77% of patients.52 Patients are usually seen within 2 weeks of devel- oping symptoms. Endodermal sinus tumor is seen primarily in girls and young women with a median age of 18 years. 52 Human chorionic gonadotropin is usually negative. Since the AFP is frequently elevated, it serves as a good tumor marker.

The FIG0 staging system is not an accurate pre- dictor of response to treatment or survival. The GOG has categorized EST into two categories: all gross tumor resected and unresectable disease or incompletely resected disease. As expected, those with all tumor resected have a more favorable prognosis. 52

Treatment consists of cytoreductive surgery fol- lowed by multiple-agent chemotherapy. Until re- cently, the majority of patients with EST died within 2 years of diagnosis. In 1975, Smith and

Rutledge59 reported VAC chemotherapy as effec- tive treatment for advanced EST. Creasman and Soper@ found comparable results using the com- bination of methotrexate, dactinomycin, and cy- clophosphamide (MAC). The BEP regimen is cur- rently being tested in EST. Survival with surgery and chemotherapy approaches 70%.52 Radiother- apy has not been found to be effective with this disease despite some initial responses.55

Embryonal carcinoma. Embryonal carcinoma accounts for only 4% of the malignant ovarian germ cell tumors. It is one of the most malignant cancers of the ovary. Initial presentation is by ab- dominal or pelvic mass. A large percentage of pa- tients also have signs and symptoms of hormonal stimulation, including precocious pseudopuberty, amenorrhea, irregular uterine bleeding, or hirsut- ism. The mean age of occurrence is 15 years.55 Embryonal carcinoma arises from primordial germ cells that have begun to differentiate, but have not differentiated into embryonic or extraembryonic tissue. The tumors contain AFP, HCG, and syn- cytiotrophoblast-like cells. Alpha-fetoprotein and HCG are useful markers to monitor this disease. Survival is reported as 50% for stage I tumors, with a 39% actuarial survival rate for all stages.61

Treatment consists of unilateral salpingo- oophorectomy and combination chemotherapy. The VAC regimen is active in treating embryonal carcinoma, but not as active as VBP in advanced cases. The BEP regimen is currently being evalu- ated. Radiation therapy is not an effective treat- ment modality for this disease.52

Choriocarcinoma. Choriocarcinoma of the ovary is divided into two groups: gestational cho- riocarcinoma, which is discussed elsewhere in this issue, and nongestational choriocarcinoma. Nongestational choriocarcinoma of the ovary arises as a germ cell differentiating toward tropho- blastic structures and secretes HCG. In the major- ity of tumors, choriocarcinoma is mixed with other neoplastic germ cell elements.

Choriocarcinoma arises primarily in prepubes- cent children and young adults. Sexual precocious puberty with growth of pubic and axillary hair, breast development, and uterine bleeding is espe- cially noticeable in prepubescent children. Adult women have signs of ectopic pregnancy. Serum and urinary HCG levels are useful diagnostic tests. Unlike gestational choriocarcinoma, nongesta- tional choriocarcinoma is not as sensitive to che-

223

motherapy. Treatments have included MAC and other combination chemotherapeutic regimens. 52

Terutoma. There are two types of teratoma, the immature teratoma and the mature teratoma. A tumor with immature or embryonal tissue arising from the ectodermal, mesodermal, and endoder- mal germ layers is defined as an immature ter- atoma. The immature teratoma accounts for less than 1% of ovarian teratomas. It usually occurs in the first two decades of life. An immature teratoma contains immature neuroepithelial elements by definition. The metastatic potential is generally correlated with the grade of the primary tumor.62 In general, the grade of metastasis reflects the grade of the primary lesion and is the best predictor of survival.

Presenting signs and symptoms include pelvic mass with or without pain, abnormal bleeding, and capsule rupture. Signs of abnormal hormonal stim- ulation are not observed. Immature teratoma is usually unilateral. Treatment consists of unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Combination chemotherapy is added for patients with grades 2 and 3 tumors and for all patients with malignant ascites, ruptured tu- mors, and persistent or recurrent disease. The VAC and MAC treatment regimens have proven to be effective for ovarian teratomas.55’63 However, post- operative chemotherapy has not improved survival for patients with grade 1 lesions. Radiotherapy is of little value in treating immature teratomas.52

Mature cystic teratoma, also called a dermoid cyst, accounts for more than 95% of all ovarian teratomas. Mature cystic teratomas are the most common ovarian tumors in the 20- to 30-year-old age group. They account for 22% to 40% of ovar- ian tumors in pregnancy.52 The majority of these benign cystic tumors contain mature tissue from the three germ layers. The most frequently ob- served elements are from the ectodermal layer and may include hair, skin, sweat glands, bone carti- lage, and teeth. When only tissue from the ecto- dermal layer is found, the tumor is considered a true dermoid cyst. Often, the multicystic lesions contain a mixture of mature tissue. The tumor is usually slow growing. Presenting symptoms are related to its size, compression of surrounding structures, torsion, or a chemical peritonitis sec- ondary to intraabdominal rupture. Torsion is the most frequently observed complication. Treatment consists of removal of the lesion.55,52,60

Mixed germ cell tumors. Malignant mixed

germ cell tumors contain at least two malignant germ cell elements. Dysgerminoma is the most fre- quently occurring element, followed by endoder- ma1 sinus tumor, immature teratoma, choriocarci- noma, and embryonal carcinoma.64 Prognosis is determined by the size and composition of tumor: prognosis is poor when the tumor is more than 10 cm and when more than one third of the tumor contains endodermal sinus tumor, choriocarci- noma, or grade 3 immature teratoma elements. Surgery alone or followed by radiotherapy has been found to be ineffective.55 Chemotherapy with the VAC and MAC regimens has been used, but the BEP and VBP regimens are being evaluated in the treatment of malignant mixed germ cell tumors of the o~ary.~*

Strom& Tumors

Malignant sex cord stromal tumors account for approximately 1% to 3% of all ovarian tumors.52 They include collagen-producing stromal cells, granulosa cells, theta cells, sertoli cells, and Ley- dig cells. Most of these tumors are hormonally active and capable of producing estrogens, andro- gens, progestins, and certain corticosteroids (Ta- ble 6).

Granulosa cell tumors occur primarily in post- menopausal women. Only 5% occur before pu- berty. The most common presenting symptom is a palpable abdominal or pelvic mass. Abdominal distention, pain, vague GI complaints, and acute abdominal pain secondary to hemoperitoneum are other presenting symptoms.65 Approximately 70% of women experience abnormal uterine bleeding as a result of hormonal stimulation. Granulosa cell tumors are usually unilateral. They are generally considered low-grade malignancies, with survival rates of 75% to 90% reported for all stages.55 Treatment consists of unilateral salpingo-oopho- rectomy in women wishing to retain fertility, or TAH and BSO for perimenopausal and postmeno- pausal patients. 52

Androblastoma and arrhenoblastoma are used synonymously with Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors; the cells resemble testis cells and may cause viriliza- tion. These tumors account for less than 0.5% of all ovarian neoplasms . Most Sertoli-Leydig tumors occur in women between 20 to 40 years of age. The majority of Sertoli-Leydig tumors are hormon- ally active (88%) and cause progressive mas- culinization.6G68 Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors tend

224 ERIKSSON AND WALCZAK

Table 6. Stromal Tumors of the Ova#‘*aMd)-”

TVP~ Description Signs/Symptoms Treatment

Granulosa cell tumors

1% to 3% of all ovarian tumors; highest incidence in postmenopausal women; 5% occur before puberty; low- grade malignancies; 75% to 90% survival

Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors

Androblastoma or arrhenoblastoma; cells resemble testes; ~0.5% of all ovarian tumors; most occur at 20 to 40 years of age; hormonally active, causing progressive masculinization; remain confined to pelvis; 70% to 90% survival

Palpable abdominal or pelvic mass; abdominal distension, GI complaints; acute abdominal pain due to hemoperitoneum; abnormal uterine bleeding due to hormonal stimulation in 70% of patients

Palpable abdominal or pelvic mass; masculinization

Unilateral salpingo- oophorectomy; TAH and SSO for perimenopausal and postmenopausal patients

Unilateral salpingo- oophorectomy

to remain confined to the pelvis and have a 5-year survival rate of 70% to 90%. Treatment consists of unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in young women desirous of childbearing.52Y66*67

NURSING MANAGEMENT OF OVARIAN CANCER PATIENTS

Nursing management of the woman with ovari- an cancer is multifaceted and focuses on support- ive and rehabilitative efforts to promote optimal quality of life. The care required is dependent on the treatment and stage of disease. At time of di- agnosis and staging laparotomy, the woman is faced with a life-threatening disease and poten- tially extensive cytoreductive surgery. Aggressive preoperative teaching and postoperative care in- clude monitoring and promoting respiratory func- tion; assisting in early, progressive ambulation; monitoring intake and output, electrolytes, vital signs, and GI and renal function; and providing the patient and her family with ongoing emotional sup- port. The nurse can facilitate verbalization of fears and concerns, clarify misconceptions, and initiate planning for adjuvant therapy and the patient’s re- turn home. Since most women with epithelial ovarian cancer are diagnosed with stages III and IV disease, combination chemotherapy will be given and is often initiated during the postoperative pe- riod. Often with all types of ovarian cancer, the woman and her family will not only have to adjust to the diagnosis and surgery, but also to the che- motherapy regimen and its side effects, such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, bone marrow depres-

sion, alopecia, neurotoxicity, liver and kidney damage, regular blood counts, and treatments ev- ery 3 to 4 weeks.

Because ovarian cancer can occur at any age, issues of fertility, sexuality, femininity, and roles and relationships within the family must be as- sessed and the need for additional support and re- ferrals determined. Referrals may range from the informal opportunity to talk with other cancer pa- tients to referrals to support groups and counselors. The major goals of these interventions would be to facilitate coping with the disease and treatment and to enable the woman and her family to optimize and maintain positive aspects of life.

Maintaining adequate nutrition is a major chal- lenge in the care of the woman with ovarian can- cer. Extensive abdominal surgery with prolonged postoperative bowel dysfunction and combination chemotherapy with the associated nausea, vomit- ing, and anorexia may necessitate enteral and par- enteral supplements as well as extensive dietary counseling.

If the tumor progresses or resistance to treatment develops, maintenance of adequate nutrition be- comes more difficult. The disease may cause re- peated incidents of bowel obstruction, carcinoma- tosis ileus, anorexia, cachexia, and ascites. Although patients may be maintained indefinitely on parenteral supplements, the potential benefits of such therapy are questionable in the face of tumor progression. Nursing efforts must focus on provid- ing physical and emotional comfort. Helping pa- tients and their families to understand the goals of nutritional intervention is important since the in- ability to eat is often a tremendous source of frus-

OVARIAN CANCER 225

Table 7. Nursing Care of the Patient With Malignant As&es

Symptomfrreatment Assessment Intervention

Abdominal distension

Respiratory compromise

Gastrointestinal distress

Fluid and electrolyte imbalance

Paracentesis

Peritoneovenous shunting

Bulging abdomen and flanks; everted umbilicus; shiny skin

Dyspnea; shortness of breath; tachypnea; use of accessory muscles

Anorexia, nausea, vomiting; dyspepsia; cachexia; bowel movements

Signs and symptoms of dehydration; lymphedema of lower extremities; signs of hypokalemia, hyponatremia, hypomagnesia

Puncture site for signs of infection, pain, leakage of ascites, skin breakdown; reaccumulation of ascites

Pain; infection; bleeding; skin integrity at operative site; DIC, tumor embolus

Daily abdominal girths, weights; palpate for fluid wave; percuss for sounds of shifting dullness

Elevate head of bed; provide rest periods; restrict activities as tolerated; oxygen as needed; analgesia as ordered

Antiemetics, antacids, laxatives as ordered; small, frequent feedings, bland diet; food supplements; diversional therapy; daily weights, caloric counts

Monitor serum protein, albumin, electrolytes; albumin, electrolytes, fluid replacements as ordered; daily weights, abdominal girth; monitor input and output, vital signs; high- protein diet; minimize sodium and fluid intake; diuretics as ordered; compression stockings, boots; assist patient in maintaining mobility

Teach patient and family about procedure and expected results; maintain asepsis; monitor drainage of fluid; alter patient’s position as necessary to promote fluid drainage; monitor fluid and electrolytes

Teaching patient and family about surgical procedure, operating room routine, methods of maintaining patency of shunt; provide shunt care; monitor fluid, electrolytes, and coagulation profile.

-

tration. Encouraging small, frequent meals or fo- cusing on comfort measures other than eating may help relieve the tension that patients and families often feel.

Management of ascites from ovarian cancer var- ies from symptom relief and treatment of the can- cer to symptomatic relief by drainage of ascites and maintaining systemic fluid and electrolyte bal- ance. As the ascites increases, severe respiratory and gastrointestinal compromise develop. Associ- ated lymphatic obstruction may cause progressive debilitating lymphedema. Nursing care focuses on comfort measures and symptom control for a pa- tient in great distress (Table 7).

Often critical organs such as the kidney or liver are not involved with tumor to permit a timely death. Instead, ovarian cancer progressively causes lymphatic obstruction with resultant lymph- edema, anasarca, massive ascites, and pleural ef- fusion while the woman remains mentally alert2 Nurses can provide psychological and physical comfort by assisting the patient to remain active

and independent as long as possible and by making necessary referrals for home and hospice care.

SUMMARY

Prevention, early detection, morbidity, and sur- vival issues continue to challenge health profes- sionals involved in the care of women with ovarian cancer. While advances in diagnosis, staging, and treatment have been made, survival rates remain grim. Continuing research in the areas of screen- ing, diagnosis, and treatment is the key to im- proved survival. The hope of new drug therapy, such as cisplatin-taxol regimens, intraperitoneal therapy, immunotherapy, and bone marrow trans- plantation, needs further investigation to become reality. As new and potentially more toxic regi- mens are developed, the nurse must be knowledge- able about the therapies and adverse effects, and maintain a high level of clinical expertise in order to teach the patient, reinforce information, clarify misconceptions, and provide the patient with sup- portive physical and emotional care.

REFERENCES

1. Silverberg E, Boring, CC, Squires, TS: Cancer statistics, logic Oncology (ed 3). St Louis, MO, Mosby, 1989. pp 325- 1990. CA 40:9-26, 1990 416

2. DiSaia PJ, Creasman WT: Advanced epithelial ovarian 3. Barber HRK: Ovarian cancer. CA 36:149-184, 1986 cancer, in DiSaia PJ, Creasman WT (eds): Clinical Gyneco- 4. Richardson GS, Scully RE, Nikrui N, et al: Common

226 ERIKSSON AND WALCZAK

epithelial cancer of the ovary. N Engl J Med 312:415-424,1985 5. The Cancer and Steriod Hormone Study of the Centers for

Disease Control and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development: The reduction in risk of ovarian cancer associated with oral contraceptive use. N Engl J Med 316:650- 655, 1987

6. Heintz APM, Hacher NF, Lugasse LD: Epidemiology and etiology of ovarian cancer: A review. Obstet Gynecol 66:127-135, 1985

7. Slotman BJ, Rao BR: Ovarian cancer (review) etiology, diagnosis, prognosis, surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and endocrine therapy. Anticancer Research 8417-434, 1988

8. Cramer DW, Welch WR, Hutchison GB, et al: Dietary animal fat in relation to ovarian cancer risk. Obstet Gynecol 63:833-838, 1984

9. Byers T, Marshall J, Graham S, et al: A case control study of dietary and nondietary factors in ovarian cancer. JNCI 71:681-686, 1983

10. Cramer DW, Welch WR, Scully RE, et al: Ovarian can- cer and talc: A case-control study. Cancer 50~372-376, 1982

11. Lynch I-IT, Conway T, Lynch J: Hereditary ovarian can- cer, in Sharp F, Mason WP, Leake RE (eds): Ovarian Cancer: Biological and Therapeutic Challenges. London, Chapman and Hall Medical, 1990, pp 7-19

12. Bjorkholm E: Blood group distribution in women with ovarian cancer. Int J Epidemiol 13:15-17, 1984

13. 0~01s RF, Young RC: Ovarian cancer. Curr Probl Can- cer 4:61-122, 1987

14. McGowan L: Ovarian cancer after hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol69:386-389, 1987

15. Tobacman JK, Greene MH, Turker MA, et al: Intraab- dominal carcinomatosis after prophylactic oophorectomy in ovarian-cancer-prone families. Lancet 2:795-797, 1982

16. Smith LH, Oi RH: Detection of malignant ovarian neo- plasms: A review of the literature. Detection of the patient at risk, clinical, radiological and cytological detection. Obstet Gy- necol Survey 39:313-328, 1984

17. Campbell S, Bhan V, Royston J, et al: Screening for early ovarian cancer. Lancet 1:710-711, 1988 (letter)

18. Brioschi PA, Irion 0, Bischof P, et al: Serum CA-125 in epithelial ovarian cancer. A longitudinal study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol94:196-201, 1987

19. Schwartz PE, Chambers SK, Chambers JT, et al: Cir- culating tumor markers in the monitoring of gynecologic ma- lignancies. Cancer 60:353-361, 1987

20. Knauf S: Clinical evaluation of ovarian tumor antigen NB/70K: Monoclonal antibody assays for distinguishing ovar- ian cancer from other gynecologic disease. Am J Obstet Gyne- co1 158:1067-1072, 1988

21. Thigpen T, Blessing J: Current therapy of ovarian car- cinoma: An overview. Semin Oncol 12:47-52, 1985 (suppl4)

22. Di Saia PJ: Conservative management of the patient with early gynecologic cancer. CA 39:135-154, 1989

23. Onnis A: Advanced ovarian ca-Therapeutic strategies. Contemp OB/GYN 13:79-105, 1986

24. Wiltshaw E, Kroner T: Phase II study of cis-dichlor- diammine platinum (11) NCS-119875 in advanced adenocarci- noma ovary. Cancer Treat Rep 60:55-60, 1976

25. Bruckner HW, Cohen CJ, Goldberg JD, et al: Improved chemotherapy for ovarian cancer with cis-diamminedichloro- platinum and adriamycin. Cancer 47:2288-2294, 1981

26. Vogl SE, Pagan0 M, Kaplan BH, et al: Cis-platin based combination chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer. High overall response rate with curative potential only in women with small tumor burdens. Cancer 51:2024-2030, 1983

27. Omura GA, Bundy B, Wilbanks G, et al: A randomized trial of cyclophosphamide (C) plus cisplatin (P) with or without Adriamycin (A) in ovarian carcinoma. Proc Am Sot Clin Oncol 6:112, 1987 (abstr 439)

28. GNP~O Interegionale Cooperative Oncologico Gineco- logia: Randomized comparison of cisplatin with cyclophospha- midelcisplatin and with cyclophosphamide/doxombicin/cispla- tin in advanced ovarian cancer. Lancet 2:353-359, 1987

29. Jakobsen A, Bertelsen K, Sell A, et al: Advantage of CAP over CP in terms of survival in advanced ovarian carci- noma. Proc Am Sot Clin Oncol4:113, 1985 (abstr)

30. Conte PF, Bruzzone M, Chiara S, et al: A randomized trial comparing cisplatin plus cyclophosphamide versus cispla- tin, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in advanced ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 4:965-971, 1986

3 1. Alberts DS, Mason-Liddil N: Carboplatin in the treat- ment of ovarian cancer. Semin Oncol 1619-26, 1989 (suppl5)

32. Muggia FM: Overview of carboplatin: Replacing, com- plementing and extending the therapeutic horizons of cisplatin. Semin Oncol 16:7-13, 1989 (suppl5)

33. Yarbro CH: Carboplatin: A clinical review. Semin On- co1 Nurs 15:63-69, 1989 (suppl)

34. McGuire WP, Rowinsky EK, Rosenshein NB, et al: Taxol: A unique antineoplastic agent with significant activity in advanced ovarian epithelial neoplasms. Ann Intern Med 111: 273-279, 1989

35. Dauplat J, Legros M, Condat P, et al: High-dose mel- phalan and autologous bone marrow support for treatment of ovarian carcinoma with positive second-look operation. Gyne- co1 Oncol34:294-298, 1989

36. Nichols CR, Tricot G, Williams SD, et al: Dose- intensive chemotherapy in refractory germ cell cancer: A phase I/II trial of high dose carboplatin and etoposide with autologous bone marrow transplantation. J Clin Oncol7:932-939, 1989

37. Mulder PO, Willemse H, Aalders JG, et ah High-dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation in patients with refractory ovarian cancer. Eur J Cancer Clin On- co1 25645649, 1989

38. Brenner DE: Intraperitoneal chemotherapy: A review. J Clin Oncol4:1135-1147, 1986

39. Myers CE: The clinical setting and pharmacology of intraperitoneal chemotherapy: An overview. Semin Oncol 12:12-26, 1985 (suppl 4)

40. Rubin SC, Hoskins WJ, Markman M, et al: Long term access to the peritoneal cavity in ovarian cancer patients. Gy- necol Oncol 3346-48, 1989

41. Swenson KK, Eriksson JH: Nursing management of in- traperitoneal chemotherapy. Oncol Nurs Forum 13:33-39, 1986

42. Alberts DS, Surwit EA, O’Toole RV: SWOG 8501- Phase III Intergroup Study. San Antonio, TX, Southwest On- cology Group, 1986

43. Creasman WT, Gall SA, Blessing JA, et al: Chemoim- munotherapy in management of primary stage III ovarian can- cer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Cancer Treat Rep 63:319-323, 1979

44. Alberts DS, Mason-Liddil N, O’Toole RV, et al: Ran- domized phase III trial of chemoimmunotherapy in patients

OVARIAN CANCER 227

with previously untreated stage III and IV suboptimal disease ovarian cancer. A Southwest Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 32:8-15, 1989

45. Berek JS, Hacker NF, Lichtenstein A, et al: Intraperi- toneal recombinant o-interferon for salvage immunotherapy in stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Cancer Res 4544474453, 1983

46. Welander CE: Use of interferon in the treatment of ovar- ian cancer as a single agent and in combination with cytotoxic drugs. Cancer 59:617-619, 1987

47. Dembo AJ: Abdominopelvic radiotherapy in ovarian cancer. Cancer 55:2285-2290, 1985 (suppl)

48. Freedman RS, Saul PD, Edwards CL, et al: Ethinyl estradiol and medroxyprogesterone acetate in patients with ep- ithelial ovarian cancer: A phase II study. Cancer Treat Rep 70~369-373, 1986

49. Kullander S: LHRH agonist treatment in ovarian cancer. International Symposium on “Hormonal Manipulation of Cancer,” Rotterdam, The Netherlands, June 4-6, 1986, p 63

50. Rendina GM, Donadio C, Giovanni M: Steroid recep- tors and progestenic therapy in ovarian endometrioid carci- noma. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol3:241-246, 1982

51. Langman J, Sadler TW: Urogenital system, in Lang- man’s Medical Embryology (ed 5). Baltimore, MD, Williams & Wilkens, 1985, pp 247-280

52. Slayton RE: Management of germ cell and stromal tu- mors of the ovary. Semin Oncol 11:299-313, 1984

53. Talerman A, Haije WG, Baggerman L: Alpha-l anti- trypsin and alphafetoprotein in sera of patients with germ-cell neoplasms: Value as tumor markers in patients with endodermal sinus tumor (yolk sac tumor). Int J Cancer 19:741-746, 1977

54. Kurman RJ, Scardino PT, Waldmann TA, et al: Malig- nant germ cell tumors of the ovary and testis. An immunologic study of 69 cases. Ann Clin Lab Sci 9:462-466, 1979

55. DiSaia PJ, Creasman WT: Germ cell, stromal and other ovarian tumors, in DiSaia PJ, Creasman WT (eds): Clinical Gynecologic Oncology (ed 3). St Louis, MO, 1989, pp 417- 449

56. Thomas G, Dembo AJ, Hacker NF, et al: Current ther-

apy for dysgerminoma of the ovary. Obstet Gynecol 70:268- 215, 1987

57. Lawson AP, Adler GF: Radiotherapy in the treatment of ovarian dysgerminomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 14:431- 434, 1988

58. Smales E, Peckham MJ: Chemotherapy of germ-cell ovarian tumors: Fist line treatment with etoposide, bleomycin and cisplatin or carboplatin. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 23:469- 474, 1987

59. Smith J, Rutledge F: Advances in chemotherapy for gy- necologic cancer. Cancer 36669-674, 1975

60. Creasman WT, Soper JT: Assessment of the contempo- rary management of germ cell malignancies of the ovary. Am J Obstet Gynecol 153:828-834, 1985

61. Kurman RJ, Norris I-II: Embryonal carcinoma of the ovary. A clinicopathologic entity distinct from endodermal si- nus tumor resembling embryonal carcinoma of the adult testis. Cancer 38:2420-2433, 1976

62. Norris HJ, Ziiken HJ, Benson WL: Immature (malig- nant) teratoma of the ovary: A clinical and pathologic study of 58 cases. Cancer 37:2359-2372, 1976

63. Williams S, Blessing J, Slayton R, et al: Ovarian germ cell tumors: Adjuvant trials of the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG). Proc Am Sot Clin Oncol 8:150, 1989 (abstr 584)

64. Kurman RJ, Norris HJ: Malignant mixed germ cell tu- mors of the ovary. A clinical and pathologic analysis of 30 cases. Obstet Gynecol 48:579-589, 1976

65. Ohel G, Kameti H, Shenker JG: Granulosa cell tumors in Israel: A study of 172 cases. Gynecol Oncol 15:278-286, 1983

66. Novak ER, Long JH: Arrhenoblastoma of the ovary. A review of the ovarian tumor registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 92:1082-1093, 1965

67. Norris HJ, Charlton J: Functioning tumors of the ovary. Clin Obstet Gynecol 17:189-228, 1974

68. O’Hem TM, Neubecker RD: Arrhenoblastoma. Obstet Gynecol 19:758-770, 1962