Outdoor Lighting Stakeholder Meeting #2 - HMGh-m-g.com/T24/Lighting/FINAL Second Outdoor Stakeholder...
Transcript of Outdoor Lighting Stakeholder Meeting #2 - HMGh-m-g.com/T24/Lighting/FINAL Second Outdoor Stakeholder...
California Statewide Utility Codes and Standards Program
1
Outdoor Lighting
Stakeholder Meeting #2
Heschong Mahone Group, Inc.
Clanton & Associates, Inc.
September 29, 2010
09/29/2010 CA Utilities 2011 Title 24 Stakeholder Meeting for Proposed Code Changes
2 2
Exterior Lighting Focus Areas
● Compare Lighting Zones (LZ) across T-24
and ASHRAE 90.1
● Compare LPA values and calibrate with
ASHRAE 90.1-2007 where differences occur
● Consider exterior lighting controls
(occupancy based) for exterior application
● Consider electronic ballasts for ext. fixtures
● Consider controls measures for parking
garages
09/29/2010 CA Utilities 2011 Title 24 Stakeholder Meeting for Proposed Code Changes
3
Item #1: Compare Lighting Zones
● Lighting zones do not exactly match, but do mostly
● Difference appears to occur in LZ1 (lowest lighting
zone), where ASHRAE/IES takes a different
philosophical approach (higher light levels
recommended)
● THIS IS DUE TO THE INCLUSION OF LZ-0 IN THE
IES/ASHRAE TABLE
● ASHRAE permits LZ designations to be set in fine
resolution (zoning mapping), T-24 encourages
large-scale mapping
09/29/2010 CA Utilities 2011 Title 24 Stakeholder Meeting for Proposed Code Changes
4
Item #1: Compare Lighting Zones
Lighting Zone Category
Title 24
Zone Description
LZ1
Dark
LZ2
Low
LZ3
Medium
LZ4
High
IESNA/ASHRAE
Zone Description
LZ0
None
LZ1
Low
LZ2
Moderate
LZ3
Mod-High
LZ4
High
09/29/2010 CA Utilities 2011 Title 24 Stakeholder Meeting for Proposed Code Changes
5
Item #1: Compare Lighting Zones
● Proposed Code Changes (NONE)
● Because the primary difference is in LZ1 (and
LZ0), the differences do not impact a large
portion of the developable state land
● LZ0 and LZ1 in the IESNA/ASHRAE document
essentially equate to LZ1 in California T-24
● CEC should leave their LZ mapping the same
to maintain consistency for this revision
09/29/2010 CA Utilities 2011 Title 24 Stakeholder Meeting for Proposed Code Changes
6
Item #2: Compare LPA Values with ASHRAE
● Direct comparisons are difficult because of
different methods for calculation and accounting
● Layered vs. non-Layered
● Tradable vs. non-Tradable
● MOST values appear to be similar
● SOME T-24 values are more restrictive (these do not
change)
● SOME ASHRAE values are more restrictive, however,
some appear too low to permit IES design
recommendation light levels to occur
● All differences are calculated and new LPA values
recommended (following Tables)
09/29/2010 CA Utilities 2011 Title 24 Stakeholder Meeting for Proposed Code Changes
7
Title 24-2008 ASHRAE 90.1-2007 Who's Lower?
Allowance Type Lighting Zone 1
Lighting Zone 2
Lighting Zone 3
Lighting Zone 4 Allowance Type Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
Area Wattage Allowance (AWA) 0.036 W/ft2
0.045 W/ft2
0.092 W/ft2
0.115 W/ft2
Uncovered Parking 0.04 W/sf 0.06 W/sf 0.10 W/sf 0.13 W/sf 90.1 Nearly Equal: 90.1
90.1 90.1
Linear Wattage Allowance (LWA) 0.36 W/lf 0.45 W/lf 0.92 W/lf 1.15 W/lf
Initial Wattage Allowance (IWA) 340 W 510 W 770 W 1030 W Base Site 500 W 600 W 750 W 1,300 W T24 Nearly Equal: T24
Nearly Equal: 90.1
T24
Building Entrances or Exits 30 watts 75 watts 100 watts 120 watts Main Entries 20 W/lf 20 W/lf 30 W/lf 30 W/lf T24 90.1 Nearly Equal: 90.1
90.1
Other Doors 20 W/lf 20 W/lf 20 W/lf 20 W/lf T24 90.1 90.1 90.1
Primary Entrances to Senior Care Facilities, Police Stations, Hospitals, Fire Stations, and Emergency Vehicle Facilities
45 watts 80 watts 120 watts 130 watts Loading areas for law enforcement
0.5 W/sf 0.5 W/sf 0.5 W/sf 0.5 W/sf T24 T24 Equal Nearly Equal: 90.1
Drive Up Windows 40 watts 75 watts 125 watts 200 watts Drive-up windows/doors 400 W per drive-thru
400 W per drive-thru
400 W per drive-thru
400 W per drive-thru
T24 T24 T24 Equal
Vehicle Service Station Uncovered Fuel Dispenser
120 watts 175 watts 185 watts 330 watts No equivalent n/a n/a n/a n/a No Equivalent Allowance
Outdoor Sales Frontage No Allowance
22.5 W/linear ft
36 W/linear ft
45 W/linear ft
Sales street frontage No allowance
10 W/lf 10 W/lf 30 W/lf See Detailed Outdoor Sales Analysis
Hardscape Ornamental Lighting No Allowance
0.02 W/ft2 0.04 W/ft2
0.06 W/ft2 Landscape 0.04 W/sf 0.05 W/sf 0.05 W/sf 0.05 W/sf T24 T24 T24 90.1
Building Facades No Allowance
0.18 W/ft2 0.35 W/ft2
0.50 W/ft2 Facades No allowance
0.1 W/sf or 2.5 W/lf
0.15 W/sf or 3.75 W/lf
0.2 W/sf or 5 W/lf
Equal 90.1 90.1 90.1
Equal T24 Nearly Equal: T24
Equal
Equal 90.1 90.1 90.1
Outdoor Sales Lots 0.164 W/ft2
0.555 W/ft2
0.758 W/ft2
1.285 W/ft2
Outdoor sales open areas 0.25 W/sf 0.25 W/sf 0.5 W/sf 0.7 W/sf See Detailed Outdoor Sales Analysis
Vehicle Service Station Hardscape
0.014 W/ft2
0.155 W/ft2
0.308 W/ft2
0.485 W/ft2
See Detailed Analysis n/a n/a n/a n/a See Detailed Service Station Analysis
Vehicle Service Station Canopies 0.514 W/ft2
1.005 W/ft2
1.358 W/ft2
2.285 W/ft2
See Detailed Analysis n/a n/a n/a n/a See Detailed Service Station Analysis
Sales Canopies No Allowance
0.655 W/ft2
0.908 W/ft2
1.135 W/ft2
Sales Canopies 0.6 W/sf 0.6 W/sf 0.8 W/sf 1.0 W/sf T24 Nearly Equal: 90.1
Nearly Equal: 90.1
Nearly Equal: 90.1
Non-sales Canopies 0.084 W/ft2
0.205 W/ft2
0.408 W/ft2
0.585 W/ft2
Entry Canopies 0.25 W/sf 0.25 W/sf 0.5 W/sf 0.7 W/sf T24 T24 T24 T24
Guard Stations 0.154 W/ft2
0.355 W/ft2
0.708 W/ft2
0.985 W/ft2
Entrances and gate-house inspection stations at guarded facilities
0.5 W/sf 0.5 W/sf 0.5 W/sf 0.5 W/sf T24 T24 90.1 90.1
Student Pick-up/Drop-off zone No Allowance
0.12 W/ft2
0.45 W/ft2
No Allowance
No equivalent n/a n/a n/a n/a No Equivalent Allowance
Outdoor Dining 0.014 W/ft2
0.135 W/ft2
0.258 W/ft2
0.435 W/ft2
Feature Areas 0.14 W/sf 0.14 W/sf 0.16 W/sf 0.2 W/sf T24 Nearly Equal: T24
90.1 90.1
Special Security Lighting for Retail Parking and Pedestrian Hardscape
0.007 W/ft2
0.009 W/ft2
0.019 W/ft2
No Allowance
Parking near 24 hour retail entrances
800 W per main entry
800 W per main entry
800 W per main entry
800 W per main entry
T24 T24 T24 T24
09/29/2010 CA Utilities 2011 Title 24 Stakeholder Meeting for Proposed Code Changes
8
Item #2: Compare LPA Values with ASHRAE
Table 147-A Remains the same
Allowance Type Lighting Zone 1
Lighting Zone 2
Lighting Zone 3
Lighting Zone 4
General Hardscape Allowance
Area Wattage Allowance (AWA)
0.036 W/ft2 0.045 W/ft2 0.092 W/ft2 0.115 W/ft2
Linear Wattage Allowance (LWA)
0.36 W/lf 0.45 W/lf 0.92 W/lf 1.15 W/lf
Initial Wattage Allowance (IWA)
340 W 510 W 770 W 1030 W
09/29/2010 CA Utilities 2011 Title 24 Stakeholder Meeting for Proposed Code Changes
9
Item #2: Compare LPA Values with ASHRAE
Table 147-B Recommended Changes
Allowance Type Lighting Zone 1
Lighting Zone 2
Lighting Zone 3
Lighting Zone 4
Wattage Allowance per
Application
Building Entrances or Exits. 30 watts 75 watts 60 watts
100 watts 90 watts
120 watts 90 watts
Primary Entrances to Senior Care Facilities, Police Stations, Hospitals, Fire Stations, and Emergency Vehicle Facilities.
45 watts 80 watts 120 watts 130 watts
Drive Up Windows. 40 watts 75 watts 125 watts 200 watts
Vehicle Service Station Uncovered Fuel Dispenser.
120 watts 175 watts 185 watts 330 watts
- Building Entrances/Exits: Values tightened to match ASHRAE 90.1-2007
„Main Entry Door‟ values in LZ2 through LZ4 (assuming 3‟ door width)
09/29/2010 CA Utilities 2011 Title 24 Stakeholder Meeting for Proposed Code Changes
10
Item #2: Compare LPA Values with ASHRAE
Table 147-B Recommended Changes (Cont.)
Allowance Type Lighting Zone 1
Lighting Zone 2
Lighting Zone 3
Lighting Zone 4
Wattage Allowance per
Unit Length (W/lf).
Outdoor Sales Frontage. No Allowance
22.5 W/linear ft
36 W/linear ft
45 W/linear ft
Wattage Allowance per
Hardscape Area
Hardscape Ornamental Lighting.
No Allowance
0.02 W/ft2 0.04 W/ft2 0.06 W/ft2
- Outdoor Sales Frontage values were re-evaluated and should remain the
same!
09/29/2010 CA Utilities 2011 Title 24 Stakeholder Meeting for Proposed Code Changes
11
Item #2: Compare LPA Values with ASHRAE
Table 147-B Recommended Changes (Cont.)
Allowance Type Lighting Zone 1
Lighting Zone 2
Lighting Zone 3
Lighting Zone 4
Wattage Allowance per Specific Area
(W/sf).
Building Facades. No Allowance
0.18 W/ft2
0.35 W/ft2
0.50 W/ft2
Outdoor Sales Lots. 0.164 W/ft2
0.555 W/ft2
0.758 W/ft2
1.285 W/ft2
Vehicle Service Station Hardscape.
0.014 W/ft2 0.155 W/ft2 0.308 W/ft2 0.485 W/ft2
Vehicle Service Station Canopies.
0.514 W/ft2
1.005 W/ft2 1.358 W/ft2 1.300 W/ft2
2.285 W/ft2 2.200 W/ft2
-Outdoor Sales Lots: Values were re-evaluated and should remain the same!
- Vehicle Service Station Canopies: Tightened in LZ3 and LZ4. A substantially different
method of calculating allowances makes direct comparison with 90.1 almost impossible
09/29/2010 CA Utilities 2011 Title 24 Stakeholder Meeting for Proposed Code Changes
12
Item #2: Compare LPA Values with ASHRAE
Table 147-B Recommended Changes (Cont.)
Allowance Type Lighting Zone 1
Lighting Zone 2
Lighting Zone 3
Lighting Zone 4
Wattage Allowance per Specific Area
(W/sf).
Sales Canopies. No Allowance
0.655 W/ft2
0.908 W/ft2
1.135 W/ft2
Non-sales Canopies. 0.084 W/ft2 0.205 W/ft2 0.408 W/ft2 0.585 W/ft2
Guard Stations. 0.154 W/ft2
0.355 W/ft2
0.708 W/ft2
0.985 W/ft2
Student Pick-up/Drop-off zone.
No Allowance
0.12 W/ft2 0.45 W/ft2 No Allowance
Outdoor Dining. 0.014 W/ft2 0.135 W/ft2 0.258 W/ft2 0.240 W/ft2
0.435 W/ft2 0.400 W/ft2
Special Security Lighting for Retail Parking.
0.007 W/ft2 0.009 W/ft2 0.019 W/ft2 No Allowance
Outdoor Dining: ASHRAE does not include a specific allowance for this application, so it
was compared to “Feature Areas” allowance and tightened
09/29/2010 CA Utilities 2011 Title 24 Stakeholder Meeting for Proposed Code Changes
13
Item #3: Consider Ext. Lighting Controls (occ-based)
● Technology is advancing, but the majority of sensors are
limited (coverage range, form factors, availability from
multiple manufacturers) for outdoor applications
● Ballast bi-level options are problematic as well (electronics
have heat sensitivity, standardization and warranty issues,
etc)
● T-20 integral sensor requirement (for 150-400 W MH fixtures)
may be in conflict with T-24 requirements if this is pursued
● T-24 cannot be technology-specific in its requirements to
avoid T-20 conflict. T-20 must address this particular issue!
● CURRENTLY NOT RECOMMENDED FOR IMPLEMENTATION IN
THIS CODE REVISION CYCLE AS A MANDATORY MEASURE
09/29/2010 CA Utilities 2011 Title 24 Stakeholder Meeting for Proposed Code Changes
14
Item #4: Consider EHID Ballasts for Energy
Calculation Baseline
● Electronic ballasts for HID have numerous technology issues
that make them currently questionable for mandatory
implementation. Two MAJOR problems are:
● Operating temperature range limitations (very low maximum
case temperature ~90° C, magnetic is good up to 180° C)
● Lamp/ballast cross-compatibility warranty support from lamp
manufacturers. (starting method, frequency, waveform, etc.).
Refer to NEMA Document LSD 14-2002
● These create a potential for considerable premature
ballast and lamp failures
● CURRENTLY NOT RECOMMENDED FOR IMPLEMENTATION IN
THIS CODE REVISION CYCLE
09/29/2010 CA Utilities 2011 Title 24 Stakeholder Meeting for Proposed Code Changes
15
Item #5: Consider Daylight and Occupancy Controls
for Parking Garages
● Parking Garages will remain in ‘Unconditioned
Spaces’ (Interior)
● Parking Garage, Top Floor is considered a ‘Parking
Lot’ and falls under Exterior (Table 147). This is
consistent with previous T-24 revisions (NO
CHANGE)
09/29/2010 CA Utilities 2011 Title 24 Stakeholder Meeting for Proposed Code Changes
16
Item #5: Consider Daylight and Occupancy Controls
for Parking Garages
● Options for Parking Garage Controls
Measures…
● Look at occupancy sensors and daylight-responsive
controls as mandatory measure
Mandatory measures have rigorous cost-
effectiveness criteria
● Look at occupancy sensors and daylight-responsive
controls using the PAF infrastructure
This approach is easier to justify, but results in
lower energy savings to the state
09/29/2010 CA Utilities 2011 Title 24 Stakeholder Meeting for Proposed Code Changes
17
Item #5: Consider Daylight and Occupancy Controls
for Parking Garages
● Current T-24 2008 Allowed Lighting Power
Densities – Area Category Method
● Parking Area
● 0.20 W/sf
● Ramp/Entry Zones
● 0.6 W/sf
● Stairwells, etc.
● 0.6 W/sf
● T-24 2008 Allowed Lighting Power Densities
– Complete Building Method
● 0.30 W/sf
09/29/2010 CA Utilities 2011 Title 24 Stakeholder Meeting for Proposed Code Changes
18
Item #5: Consider Daylight and Occupancy Controls
for Parking Garages
● Daylight Sensors in Garages
09/29/2010 CA Utilities 2011 Title 24 Stakeholder Meeting for Proposed Code Changes
19
Item #5: Consider Daylight and Occupancy Controls
for Parking Garages
● Calculations show ~31% of 24-hour energy
consumption in Primary Daylight Zone can
be eliminated through ON/OFF controls IF:
● Min. 40% window opening (min. 50% for partially
obstructed daylight access)
● 25’ primary daylight zone (in from window wall)
● ‘Full Lot’ car obstruction
● Presuming PC set to turn OFF lights at 5X design level.
● These results are independent of:
● Orientation
● Geographical Location
09/29/2010 CA Utilities 2011 Title 24 Stakeholder Meeting for Proposed Code Changes
20
Item #5: Consider Daylight and Occupancy Controls
for Parking Garages
● Issues with Daylighting in Garages
● Location in the State (Latitude)
● Orientation of building facades
● Exterior objects blocking daylight access
● ‘Quality’ of Daylight – Useful vs. glare
09/29/2010 CA Utilities 2011 Title 24 Stakeholder Meeting for Proposed Code Changes
21
Item #5: Consider Daylight and Occupancy Controls
for Parking Garages
● 15 Year TDV Calculations show Daylighting
Controls are cost effective.
● 0.2 WSF Power Density
● ON/OFF control approach (non-dimming)
● OFF point set to 5X the design criteria (25 fc)
● Full and partial parking conditions
● Including four orientations of building
● Including clear and cloudy weather conditions
09/29/2010 CA Utilities 2011 Title 24 Stakeholder Meeting for Proposed Code Changes
22
Item #5: Consider Daylight and Occupancy Controls
for Parking Garages
● Current Recommendation:
Make Daylighting Controls a
mandatory measure when the
minimum requirements are met
09/29/2010 CA Utilities 2011 Title 24 Stakeholder Meeting for Proposed Code Changes
23
Item #5: Consider Daylight and Occupancy Controls
for Parking Garages
● Requirements for Daylight Sensors in
Parking Garages:
● Parking garage orientations with open sky exposure must have a
minimum of 40% open walls. (50% open walls required for
orientations with obscured or limited sky exposure)
● Areas within 25ft of the perimeter wall are considered the
primary daylight zone, assuming there is greater than 35’ of
window wall
● Luminaires located in the primary daylighted zone MUST be
switched ‘OFF’ when detected illuminance levels exceed no more
than five times the design criteria within the zone. This can be
done by dimming or ON/OFF controls
● Minimum of one daylight sensor for each floor and orientation
09/29/2010 CA Utilities 2011 Title 24 Stakeholder Meeting for Proposed Code Changes
24
Item #5: Consider Daylight and Occupancy Controls
for Parking Garages
● Occupancy Sensors in Garages
09/29/2010 CA Utilities 2011 Title 24 Stakeholder Meeting for Proposed Code Changes
25
Item #5: Consider Daylight and Occupancy Controls
for Parking Garages
● Prediction Models Predict ~14% energy
savings and only ~3% savings for entry floor
for Moderate Activity Level Garage
● Assuming 50% setback energy use
● About 10 hours of ‘low use’ with 2 ‘visits’ per hour
● Entry floor will have 5 discreet ‘visits’ per hour
● 10 minute delay on sensors
● Garages with Low Activity Levels will show
improved energy savings, up to ~28%
savings and ~9% for entry floor
09/29/2010 CA Utilities 2011 Title 24 Stakeholder Meeting for Proposed Code Changes
26
Item #5: Consider Daylight and Occupancy Controls
for Parking Garages
● High Activity Level
● Central Downtown with Shopping, Food, Bars
● Large Airport
● Medium Activity Level
● Large Malls
● Busy office Parks
● Campus Parking Near Dorms
● Low Activity Level
● Small Shopping Areas
● Office Parks
● Limited Hours Facilities (sports arenas, etc.)
09/29/2010 CA Utilities 2011 Title 24 Stakeholder Meeting for Proposed Code Changes
27
Item #5: Consider Daylight and Occupancy Controls
for Parking Garages
● Issues with occupancy controls in Parking
Garages:
● Limited entries/exits results in a lot of ‘ON time’ for entry
and lower floors
● Delay times reduce energy savings even with a transient
population
● Low temperature effects on ballasts/lamps when switching
or dimming (Fluorescent)
● Switching of some lamp technologies are a problem (HID)
09/29/2010 CA Utilities 2011 Title 24 Stakeholder Meeting for Proposed Code Changes
28
Item #5: Consider Daylight and Occupancy Controls
for Parking Garages
● 15 Year TDV Calculations show Occupancy
Sensors are cost effective
● 0.2 WSF Power density
● 100% to 50% ‘high/low’ power consumption
● ~10 hours a day of low occupancy with 50% of
time at ‘low’ setting
● ~14 hours a day of high occupancy with 83% of
time at ‘high’ setting
09/29/2010 CA Utilities 2011 Title 24 Stakeholder Meeting for Proposed Code Changes
29
Item #5: Consider Daylight and Occupancy Controls
for Parking Garages
● Current Recommendation:
Make Occupancy Sensors a mandatory
measure for all parking garages
09/29/2010 CA Utilities 2011 Title 24 Stakeholder Meeting for Proposed Code Changes
30
Item #5: Consider Daylight and Occupancy Controls
for Parking Garages
● Requirements for Occupancy Sensors in
Parking Garages:
● Auto On/Off (High/Low) controls must be used
● Automatically reduce lighting power when unoccupied by
50-80% per control zone
● This applies to parking deck areas only
● Adaptation lighting zones, dedicated ramps, and entrances
to exit stairwells or elevator lobbies are not required to
have occupancy sensors
● Are there other areas or garage types that should be
excluded?
● Maximum delay time of 10 minutes
09/29/2010 CA Utilities 2011 Title 24 Stakeholder Meeting for Proposed Code Changes
31
Item #5: Consider Daylight and Occupancy Controls
for Parking Garages
● MORE INFO NEEDED ON OCCUPANCY/USE
PROFILES TO REFINE THE ANTICIPATED
SAVINGS ANALYSIS!
Please email Michael Mutmansky at:
Or call 303-530-7229
If you have any useful information.