“Our kids will see hunger relegated to museums”
description
Transcript of “Our kids will see hunger relegated to museums”
“Our kids will see hunger relegated to museums”Trade
barriers
It’s their own faultWe already give more
than anyone else
over a trillion $ wasted
1 billion stuffed & 1 b starved
MDGs will not be achieved
Corrupt dictators
Corrupt
multinationals
Steady progress MDGsTilted playing
field
Malthus
rich nations broke their promises2008 recession
We never promised 0.7%trade not aid
Toward a world without hunger ...
www.sfu.ca/global-nutrition
… 2 perspectives
“Our kids will see hunger relegated to museums”Trade
barriers
It’s their own faultWe already give more
than anyone else
Trillions wasted
There are more hungry now than ever
MDGs are unachievable
Corrupt dictators
Corrupt
multinationals
Steady progress MDGs
Tilted playing field
“Things will get worse no matter what we do”
Malthus
Rich nations broke
their promises2008 recession
We never promised 0.7%Trade not aid
41970 1980 1990 2000 2010500
600
700
800
900
1000
Mill
ions
und
er-n
ouri
shed
1970 20080
2000
4000
6000FedMal-nour-ished
51960 1980 2000 2020
15
33
16
%undernourished
1970 20080
2000
4000
6000 Fed
Malnour-ished
Num
ber o
f peo
ple
(mill
ions
) ad
equa
tely
nou
rishe
d (F
AO
ant
hrop
omet
ric d
ata)
61970 1980 1990 2000 2010200
300
400
500
600
f(x) = 8.21121293077502 x − 15930.2774664487
Wor
ld G
DP
$PPP
per
ca
p (e
st) 1
500-
2100
71500 2000$0
$5,000
$10,000
Indi
a to
150
0
China & Indiato 1850
WesternEuropeto 1945
USA & WestEurope
since 1945
Chi
na &
Indi
a
http://ers.usda.gov/Data/Macroeconomics/
GDP per capita / past 10 years
8
1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010$600
f(x) = 292376.226469201 ln(x) − 2214918.51992798f(x) = 6434.86075784702 ln(x) − 48497.8881060144f(x) = 15848.6410819206 ln(x) − 120034.398796704f(x) = 15848.6410819206 ln(x) − 120034.398796704f(x) = 118551.334790581 ln(x) − 898968.779757484f(x) = 210784.13289449 ln(x) − 1598330.19689863f(x) = 210784.13289449 ln(x) − 1598330.19689863
Sub-Sahara (minus SA)
1999 $5992009 $743
Av growth rate 2.7%
$700
91970 20080
2000
4000
6000Fed
Malnourished
% In
fant
mor
talit
y <
5 ye
ars
101920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 20100
10
20
30
40
http
://w
ww
.chi
ldin
fo.o
rg/m
orta
lity_
infa
ntm
orta
lity.
php
also
ww
w.g
apm
min
der.o
rg
Still poverty trapped
India
USA
Singapore
Deaths (millions) before age 5 in 2006
12
[]
[]
14
GD
P/ca
p %
gro
wth
in p
oor
coun
trie
s ex
ceed
s de
velo
ped
year2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
% G
DP/
cap
pa fo
r poo
r nat
ions
- %
for r
ich
Prog
ress
tow
ard
MD
Gs
160 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
2005
2006
% < $1.25 /day
% undernourished
% deaths < 5y
H2O
gree
n ba
r is
targ
et fo
r 201
5
2006
red bar is 1990; amber bar is 2008
school
pregnt
Porkbarrelling & Swiss bank a/c’s
multi-nationals
dictators
Offshore bank a/c’s
Rich nationpoliticians government
people in poor countries(hate corruption)
commod
ities
taxpayers in rich (Nato?) countries
“military-industrialcomplex”
Tanks & rockets for right wing regimes, invasions for “freedom & democracy”, & depose “socialists” Treaties force unfair tariffs & trade.
Share-holders
$
$
$
$$$
$
election funds,inducements
concessions
$
18
Aid that doesn't work• $ → Swiss bank accounts of dictators• that benefits the giver more than the
recipient• unsustainable aid - the need is emergency
aid and resources for sustainable development
• level playing field• independence → acceleration of economic
growth• discovery of wealth → poverty
19
Aid that does work• Transparent • Partnerships• SMART objectives• Revised annually• Externally accountable• Not self-serving• Commitments are long term (Grameen, MV,
MDG)
20
21
http://www.globalissues.org/article/35/foreign-aid-development-assistance#GovernmentsCuttingBackonPromisedResponsibilities
• Ireland• Luxemborg• Sweden• Denmark• Norway• Netherland
s• UK
Low share of phantom aid
60% of UA ODA goes to Iraq & Israel
22
[US Senator Patrick] Leahy noted that two-thirds of US government aid goes to only two countries: Israel and Egypt. Much of the remaining third is used to promote US exports or to fight a war against drugs that could only be won by tackling drug abuse in the United States.”
UN Secretary General Kofi Annan noted that the flow of money from poor to rich countries far exceeded total ODA.“Funds should be moving from developed countries to developing countries, but the opposite is happening…. Funds that should be promoting investment and growth in developing countries, or building schools and hospitals, or supporting other steps towards the Millennium Development Goals, are, instead, being transferred abroad.”
instead of promoting investment in health, education, and infrastructure development in the third world, this money has been channelled to the North, either because of debt servicing arrangements, asymmetries and imbalances in the trade system or because of inappropriate liberalisation and privatisation measures imposed upon them by the international financial and trading system.
More recent than the MDGs & making a difference
• Grameen Family of social enterprises
• Billionnaire Philanthropists & foundations
• The Millennium Village project
• Passionate & influential voices for change
• Scientists & students
• The Millennium Development Goals
• Rapid exchange of info & ideas by internet
24
Passionate renegades
Pitfalls problems & roadblocks
• Financial melt-down• National scale land purchases• Food fuel ...• War on terror ...• Nations in bondage to IMF debt• Unfair trade practices• Climate change• Globalization of food economics• Clean water & air have become commodities
Vandana Shiva on globalization
Vandana Shiva on Food Laws
Diverts development & aid $ Increases the price of foods
Also displaced persons & Destroys the local economy
Nothing helps Poverty will go
26
It’s their own fault
Corrupt dictators
Malthus
2008 recession
Trillions wasted
MDGs are unachievable
Corrupt multinationals
They will be achievedWe know what works & doesn’t
Throwing $ at problems
Will delay progress by 4-8 y
They don’t need $
• there is no reason for complacency or self-satisfaction
• 10,000,000 kwash ward [= no of kids born in Can in 30 years] 35M birth rate 10/1000 = 350k kids/y]
• The faster we move the less we have to cope with population growth,
27
28
Show as stacked histogram• %le rank Member countries• 90-100 NZ, Scand, Switz, Can, Aus, HK, W Eur & UK• 50-90 US, France, UAE, Israel, Botsw, SA, Namib, Turky• Kuwait, Ghana, Greece, China, Swaziland, India, Panama,
Thailand• 33-50 Morocco, Malawi, Lesotho, Mex, Rwanda, SriLan, Liberia,
Zambia, Senegal, Niger, Gambia, Argentina, Egypt, Algeria, Mali
• 15-30 Vietnam, Ethiopia, Uganda, Nigeria, Lybia, Zimbabwe, Russia, Kenya, Ukraine
• 5-10 Tajikistan, Cambodia, Laos, Central African Republic, Congo, Angola, Venezuela,
• 0-5 Turkmenistan, Iran, Haiti, Guinea, Uzbekistan, Iraq, Sudan, Myanmar, Afghanistan, Somalia (6 /54 African)
29
•1-liner Toward MDGs - what works, what doesn’t•Introduce the antagonist. “Dead aid”. 3 points: 1 the trajectory says YES ... but too slow2 transp, sustained, targeted aid works3 it’s working thanks to few nations & initiatives•Visual slides – not for note-taking•Visual presentation of quantitative data•Reveal the holy smokes moment•Rehearsals beginning mid-late Sept•Just before the talk remind yourself of passion
MDG progress 2010
• http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs290/en/index.html
• http://www.fao.org/mdg/en/• http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/reports.
shtml#mdgs
32
MDG Critique & Scenarios• MDGs a critique from the south Sept 2010• http://allafrica.com/stories/201010010582.html
The MDGs after the Crisis The MDGs after the Crisis
World bank analyses scenarios. Crisis recovery matters, but not as much as kept promises
33