Our Contribution to the Forum

31

Transcript of Our Contribution to the Forum

Page 1: Our Contribution to the Forum
Page 2: Our Contribution to the Forum

INPRO dialogue forum 7Vienna – 19-22 November 20131

Our Contribution to the ForumGeneral presentation of the EPRTM ReactorCR1.1.1 ‘Robustness’PART 1 – Margins - SimplicityPART 2 – Quality of design and construction – Quality of materials – RedundancyPART 3 – Robustness to external hazards

UR1.4 ‘Release into the Containment’CR3.1.1 ‘Occupational Dose’

Page 3: Our Contribution to the Forum

INPRO dialogue forum 7Vienna – 19-22 November 20132

Presentation of the EPRTM reactor

Franck LigniniReactor & Services / Safety & Licensing

Page 4: Our Contribution to the Forum

3 INPRO dialogue forum 7Vienna – 19-22 November 2013

AREVA Reactor Range

* In partnership with MHI

Page 5: Our Contribution to the Forum

4 INPRO dialogue forum 7Vienna – 19-22 November 2013

Page 6: Our Contribution to the Forum

5 INPRO dialogue forum 7Vienna – 19-22 November 2013

The EPRTM Reactor

Page 7: Our Contribution to the Forum

INPRO dialogue forum 7Vienna – 19-22 November 20136

EPRTM reactor Design Key drivers

Page 8: Our Contribution to the Forum

7 INPRO dialogue forum 7Vienna – 19-22 November 2013

The EPRTM Reactor Overall Design Key Drivers (1/3)

Page 9: Our Contribution to the Forum

8 INPRO dialogue forum 7Vienna – 19-22 November 2013

The EPRTM Reactor Overall Design Key Drivers (2/3)

Page 10: Our Contribution to the Forum

9 INPRO dialogue forum 7Vienna – 19-22 November 2013

The EPRTM Reactor Overall Design Key Drivers (3/3)

Page 11: Our Contribution to the Forum

10 INPRO dialogue forum 7Vienna – 19-22 November 2013

The EPRTM Reactor Building on N4 and Konvoi achievements (1/3)

Page 12: Our Contribution to the Forum

11 INPRO dialogue forum 7Vienna – 19-22 November 2013

Fuel BuildingFuel Building

Nuclear Auxiliary BuildingNuclear Auxiliary Building

Office BuildingOffice Building

Turbine BuildingTurbine Building

Turbine Island Electrical Building Turbine Island Electrical Building

Radioactive Waste Processing Building Radioactive Waste Processing Building

Safeguard Building Division 1Safeguard Building Division 1Reactor BuildingReactor Building

Diesel Building 1+2Diesel Building 1+2

Safeguard Building Division 2+3 Safeguard Building Division 2+3

Safeguard Building Division 4 Safeguard Building Division 4

Diesel building 3+4Diesel building 3+4

Access BuildingAccess Building

Plant - Overview

Page 13: Our Contribution to the Forum

12 INPRO dialogue forum 7Vienna – 19-22 November 2013

The EPRTM Reactor Building on N4 and Konvoi achievements (2/3)

Page 14: Our Contribution to the Forum

13 INPRO dialogue forum 7Vienna – 19-22 November 2013

Type of plants N4 EPR KONVOI

Core thermal power (MWth) 4250 4590 3850Electrical output (MWe) 1475 1660 1365Number of loops 4 4 4N° of fuel assemblies 205 241 193Type of fuel assemblies 17x17 17x17 18x18Active length (cm) 427 420 390Total F.A. length (cm) 480 480 483Rod linear heat rate (W/cm) 179 166,7 167N° of control rods 73 89 61Total flowrate (kg/s) 19420 22256 18800Vessel outlet temp. (°C) 330 330 326Vessel inlet temp. (°C) 292 295.2 292S.G.: heat exch. Surface (m²) 7308 7960 5400Saturation Steam Pressure (bar) 73,1 77.2 65.5

The EPRTM Reactor Building on N4 and Konvoi achievements (3/3)

Page 15: Our Contribution to the Forum

14 INPRO dialogue forum 7Vienna – 19-22 November 2013

The EPRTM Reactor Key Technical Characteristics

Page 16: Our Contribution to the Forum

15 INPRO dialogue forum 7Vienna – 19-22 November 2013

The EPRTM Reactor Key Characteristics of reactor coolant system

Page 17: Our Contribution to the Forum

16 INPRO dialogue forum 7Vienna – 19-22 November 2013

The EPRTM Reactor Reactor Core Characteristics

Page 18: Our Contribution to the Forum

17 INPRO dialogue forum 7Vienna – 19-22 November 2013

The EPRTM Reactor Overview of Safety Systems

Page 19: Our Contribution to the Forum

18 INPRO dialogue forum 7Vienna – 19-22 November 2013

The EPRTM Reactor Diversity of Safety Systems

Page 20: Our Contribution to the Forum

19 INPRO dialogue forum 7Vienna – 19-22 November 2013

The EPRTM Reactor - Main Fluid Systems

Page 21: Our Contribution to the Forum

20 INPRO dialogue forum 7Vienna – 19-22 November 2013

The EPRTM Reactor - Installation in the Safeguard and Auxiliary Buildings (SAB)

Control room

Spent Fuel Storage Pool

ESWSCCWS SIS/RHRSEFWS

ESWSCCWSSIS/RHRSEFWS

ESWSCCWSSIS/RHRSCHRSEFWS

ESWSCCWSSIS/RHRSCHRSEFWS

EBS FPCS Airplane crash protected buildings

division 1 division 4

division 3division 2

SPREADINGAREA

IRWSTSLFW

SLFW

Steam lines penetrationsFeedwater lines penetrations

Control room

Spent Fuel Storage Pool

ESWSCCWS SIS/RHRSEFWS

ESWSCCWSSIS/RHRSEFWS

ESWSCCWSSIS/RHRSCHRSEFWS

ESWSCCWSSIS/RHRSCHRSEFWS

EBS FPCS Airplane crash protected buildingsAirplane crash protected buildings

division 1 division 4

division 3division 2

SPREADINGAREA

IRWST

SPREADINGAREA

IRWSTSLFW

SLFW

Steam lines penetrationsFeedwater lines penetrations

Page 22: Our Contribution to the Forum

21 INPRO dialogue forum 7Vienna – 19-22 November 2013

The EPRTM Reactor - Principles for safety classification of systems

Page 23: Our Contribution to the Forum

22 INPRO dialogue forum 7Vienna – 19-22 November 2013

The EPRTM Reactor - Allocation of main I&C functions

Page 24: Our Contribution to the Forum

23 INPRO dialogue forum 7Vienna – 19-22 November 2013

The EPRTM Reactor - I&C Human Machine Interface

Page 25: Our Contribution to the Forum

24 INPRO dialogue forum 7Vienna – 19-22 November 2013

The EPRTM Reactor - I&C Overall Architecture

Page 26: Our Contribution to the Forum

25 INPRO dialogue forum 7Vienna – 19-22 November 2013

99.9% of EPR™ features comply with EUR requirements** Statistics established over 4678 requirements

The certificate attesting to the EPR™ reactor’s compliance with European utility requirements was officially awarded to AREVA on July 15 2009The EPR™ reactor has outstripped the EUR specifications in the following areas: Protection against the airplane crash (the risk of the large commercial

aircraft is covered), Spent fuel storage capacity Life expectancy of 60 years

against 40 required by the EUR

EPR™ reactor certified by EUR

Page 27: Our Contribution to the Forum

26 INPRO dialogue forum 7Vienna – 19-22 November 2013

AREVA worldwide engagement in EPR licensing

Olkiluoto 3Olkiluoto 3

Flamanville 3Flamanville 3

Hinkley Point CHinkley Point C

UK NSL + GDANov. + Dec. 2012

Taishan 1&2Taishan 1&2USA (COLA)USA (COLA)

Design Certification of US EPR : 2014/2015

The EPRTM reactor is:

The only Gen3 model under construction in the EU

The only reactor designed within the EU

The only reactor licensed by 3 independent European regulators

Construction LicenseFebruary 2005

Construction LicenseApril 2007

Construction LicenseOctober 2009

Page 28: Our Contribution to the Forum

27 INPRO dialogue forum 7Vienna – 19-22 November 2013

The value of Experience Standardization of early engineering activities

P&ID : Important input for layout in order to validate Civil Works (CW) interfaces

DSE stage 2 : important input for I&C

14

30

109

20

3

P&ID First issue(months)

OL3Taishan

-36%-33%

-70%

System Description Stage 2 - First issue

(months)

NSSS engineering standardized and streamlined NSSS engineering standardized and streamlined

System activities:Input data for other disciplines ready earlier and better defined

System activities:Input data for other disciplines ready earlier and better defined

Number of engineering hoursfor NSSS completion

(for Taishan: estimate)

Piping isometricsNb of revisions

OL3 Taishan

-60%

Page 29: Our Contribution to the Forum

28 INPRO dialogue forum 7Vienna – 19-22 November 2013

Construction duration (# months) Construction duration (# months)

The value of experience Illustration, from OL3 to TSN: first main milestones

126

4

17

127

10

TSN1OL3

Slab +1,5m

Start of innercontainment

Gussetpouring

1st concrete

Dome lifting

24

47

126

4

17

127

10

TSN1OL3

Slab +1,5m

Start of innercontainment

Gussetpouring

1st concrete

Dome lifting

24

47

Page 30: Our Contribution to the Forum

29 INPRO dialogue forum 7Vienna – 19-22 November 2013

Key MessagesThe EPRTM Reactor is an evolution of mature French and German reactors, incorporating proven technologies as well as innovations validated through R&D programmes

The Safety features of the EPRTM Reactor integrate the lessons learned from the past. They have been deemed necessary and sufficient by the safety authorities of advanced nuclear countries as fulfilling the most stringent GEN III safety objectives, until March 2011

The lessons learned from the Fukushima event are not yet all drawn

A preliminary evaluations show that the EPRTM reactor would have withstood the earthquake and the subsequent tsunami

The soundness of the EPRTM reactor design was confirmed by the complementary safety evaluations (stress tests) performed by the European Regulators ; however light improvements may be incorporated to satisfy new requirements

Page 31: Our Contribution to the Forum

INPRO dialogue forum 7Vienna – 19-22 November 201330

Thank you for your attention