OSU gridFUTURE Presentation

download OSU gridFUTURE Presentation

of 29

Transcript of OSU gridFUTURE Presentation

  • 7/30/2019 OSU gridFUTURE Presentation

    1/29

    gridFUTURE:A holistic vision of the future energy grid

    OSU ECE 3040

    January 11, 2013

    John M. Schneider, Dr. [email protected]

    Technology Consultant

  • 7/30/2019 OSU gridFUTURE Presentation

    2/29

    gridFUTURE

    Well rooted in power systems knowledge, grid operationalexperience and a fundamental understanding of existingand emerging technologies. Technologically achievable, but not commercially viable today.

    gridFUTURE will never be achieved Constantly evolves as technology, the economy and societal

    needs change.

    Current Smart Grid efforts involve near term tactics, which

    will gradually evolve towards gridFUTURE, again andagain and again... Forward compatible (No Regrets Strategy)

    A holistic vision of the future energy grid.Primary electrical energy source through utilization.

    Vision must precede strategy, which is achieved

    through tactics 2

  • 7/30/2019 OSU gridFUTURE Presentation

    3/29

    U.S. 2011 ElectricalEnergy Source Profile

    Energy Source Mix

    45% Coal, 21% Nuclear, 20% Gas, 13%Renewable, 1% Oil

    Total Generation

    655 GW Utility, 408 GW IPP, 76 GW IPPCHP, (1139 GW Total)

    Consumption 38% Residential, 36% Commercial, 26%

    Industrial

    3

    http://www.eia.doe.gov/
  • 7/30/2019 OSU gridFUTURE Presentation

    4/29

    U.S. 2011 Electricity Flow(Quads, 1015 BTUs)

    Grid Net efficiency31.7%! 4

    Commercial 4.50

    Residential 4.86

    Coal 18.04

    Nuclear 8.26

    ConversionLosses25.22

    Total EnergyConsumed

    40.04

    http://www.eia.doe.gov/
  • 7/30/2019 OSU gridFUTURE Presentation

    5/29

    Losses & Efficiency in Electric

    Generation & Delivery

    100

    coal electricity

    65.5% loss ~ 4.8% loss

    Generation Transmission

    ~ 35

    Distribution

    electricity

    ~ 33

    electricity

    ~ 31

    ~ 88% loss

    End Use

    Utilization

    ~4

    ~ 5.1% loss

    Adapted from EPRI source image

    5

  • 7/30/2019 OSU gridFUTURE Presentation

    6/29

    Waste Heat The 31.7% net efficiency of the U.S. electrical grid,

    implies that 68.3% of the primary energy consumedin the production, transmission and distribution of

    electricity is wasted primarily as heat rejected to the

    environment.

    Remote location of central generation

    Potential solutions: Combined Heat and Power (CHP, Cogeneration)

    Industrial colocation

    Distributed Generation, locates many small generation sources

    closer to the electrical (and thermal) load

    Space heating

    Water heating

    Absorption cooling

    6

  • 7/30/2019 OSU gridFUTURE Presentation

    7/29

    Grid Topology & Attributes

    Commercial

    NO/NC

    ~ ~

    ~

    Industrial

    Residential

    AEP Central Generation

    1-1300 MW (38 GW total)

    Water source (10-100s mi from load)

    80 Plants

    66% coal, 6% Nuclear, 22% Gas,

    6%Other

    Net Efficiency of ~35% Heat lost to environment - No Cogeneration

    Moderate level ofMonitoring,Communications & Control (MCC)

    7

  • 7/30/2019 OSU gridFUTURE Presentation

    8/29

    Grid Topology & Attributes

    Commercial

    NO/NC

    ~ ~

    ~

    Industrial

    Residential

    AEP Transmission System

    69-765 kV

    38,953 total mi.

    10-150 mi. length

    Interconnected Grid

    Low/Moderate MCC Self-protecting

    Supervised operation

    8

  • 7/30/2019 OSU gridFUTURE Presentation

    9/29

    Grid Topology & Attributes

    Commercial

    NO/NC

    ~ ~

    ~

    Industrial

    Residential

    AEP DistributionSystem 12-35 kV

    207,632 total mi.

    1-40 mi. length Rural Distribution

    OH Radial

    Low/No MCC

    Manual operation 9

  • 7/30/2019 OSU gridFUTURE Presentation

    10/29

    AEP Business Confidential 10

    Grid Topology & Attributes

    Commercial

    NO/NC

    ~ ~

    ~

    Industrial

    Residential

    AEP UrbanDistribution

    OH Radial/SwitchedLoop

    UG Radial/SwitchedLoop/Multi-fed

    Little/No MCC

  • 7/30/2019 OSU gridFUTURE Presentation

    11/29

    Grid Topology & Attributes

    Commercial

    NO/NC

    ~ ~

    ~

    Industrial

    Residential

    Urban Distribution UG Secondary

    Network

    Moderate MCC11

  • 7/30/2019 OSU gridFUTURE Presentation

    12/29

    Commercial

    NO/NC

    ~ ~

    ~

    Industrial

    Residential

    Existing Grid Generation: Large, Central, Remote (Little

    Cogeneration), Moderate MonitoringCommunications & Control (MCC)

    Transmission: Interconnected, Self-protecting,Low/Moderate MCC (SCADA)

    Distribution: Extensive, Low/No MCC (Manual)

    Customer: No MCC (Limited exceptions)

    Extensive infrastructure

    Moderate/No MCC

    No Cogeneration

    More load requires more G,T&D 12

  • 7/30/2019 OSU gridFUTURE Presentation

    13/29

    Distributed storage would enable base-loadoperation of grid assets.Distributed storage and generation would enablegrid independence.

    Something to think about

    Average3kW

    Time

    DailyLoa

    d

    Peak8-10 kW

    Distribution System

    Energy Storage

    The Grid is designed to meet the peak power requirement,from the coal pile to the blow dryer.

    3 kW Fuel Cellor

    18 kW Solar PV

    13

  • 7/30/2019 OSU gridFUTURE Presentation

    14/29

    G,T&D Asset Base LoadingImplications

    Base load power system assets

    Reduce variation in load level by reducing peaks and filling

    valleys of load variation.

    Power system components are rated to meet the peak

    requirement of the load. Less G,T&D Infrastructure

    Higher utilization of all grid assets

    Most thermal power plants are optimized for peak load

    operation More efficient generation

    Reduced thermal cycling of grid components

    Less thermal stress, less maintenance

    14

  • 7/30/2019 OSU gridFUTURE Presentation

    15/29

    and something else to

    think aboutThe engine kW-equivalent (~100 kW/auto) oftwo years of U.S. auto sales exceeds thecountrys total installed electrical generatingbase (~1139 GW).

    Consider:

    AEP HQ building: Maximum load 5.4 MW

    AEP HQ Total Garage Capacity: 2087 cars

    Assuming a 50kW fuel cell car (FCEV), operated at acomposite net capacity of 30%

    AEPGarages Gen Capability 31 MWe+ 39 MWt

    e= 40% /t= 50% 15

  • 7/30/2019 OSU gridFUTURE Presentation

    16/29

    Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle FCEV is an electric vehicle powered by the

    combination of a fuel cell and a battery. Fuel Cell is an electrochemical energy converter: It

    converts the chemical energy in a fuel (natural gas) in

    the presence of an oxidant (oxygen in air) into

    electricity, heat & byproducts (H2O & CO2). Requires on-board fuel storage.

    Mobile electrical/thermal/water generation source

    Potential to power and heat homes, businesses and

    remote locations

    16

  • 7/30/2019 OSU gridFUTURE Presentation

    17/29

    the Grid of the Future?

    Residential

    Commercial

    Industrial

    Storage

    WindFuel Cell

    Solar

    Grid of the Future: Optimal integration of central &distributed assets.

    17

  • 7/30/2019 OSU gridFUTURE Presentation

    18/29

    Imc2, gridFUTUREs Key Enabler Acronym forIntelligent monitoring communications and control.

    Advanced concept that will be realized in the grid of the future, and can begenerally characterized as the underlying technologies, which will make

    the smart grid truly smart.

    Involves the broad integration of sensors, bi-directional communications,

    actuators and intelligence (computational capability) into components

    throughout the grid from the sources of generation and storage, throughthe transmission and distribution systems, into the meter and,

    ultimately, the customers loads.

    The embedded component intelligence will be controlled by an

    overarching, distributed, hierarchical control system responsible for

    coordinating everything from local component protection to overall gridoptimization.

    Enables anticipatory/reactionary self-healing; plug-n-play; aggregation

    and dispatch; autonomous operation; situational awareness and learning;

    self-adaptation.

    18

  • 7/30/2019 OSU gridFUTURE Presentation

    19/29

    gridFUTURE Hierarchical ControlSystem Topology

    Storage

    Commercial

    NO/NC

    ~

    ~

    Industrial

    Residential

    ~

    Wind

    Fuel Cell

    Solar

    Monitoring &OptimizationCenter

    RegionalAggregation/Control

    ControlPoint

    19

  • 7/30/2019 OSU gridFUTURE Presentation

    20/29

    gridFUTURE Hierarchical ControlSystem Attributes

    Progressively higher level information develops as it flowsup the hierarchy.

    Timely control actions communicated throughouthierarchy as actionable information develops. Decision making conducted at lowest level of hierarchy

    Secure

    Redundant, prioritized communications System protection

    Transient stability

    Dynamic stability

    Contingency planning

    Load management

    System optimization

    System status

    20

  • 7/30/2019 OSU gridFUTURE Presentation

    21/29

    gridFUTURE Hierarchical ControlSystem Attributes

    Interfaces with smart loads & grid components. Aggregation & dispatch

    Central, Distributed Generation & Storage

    Load (Load as a resource)

    Autonomous Operation Seamless separation/autonomous operation (reducedfunctionality)/reconnection

    Self-healing Automatically reconfigures topology & operating

    protocols in anticipation or result of systemcontingency

    Grid Optimization Both central & distributed assets in near real-time.

    21

  • 7/30/2019 OSU gridFUTURE Presentation

    22/29

    gridFUTURE Smart Components Embedded sensors and actuators

    Voltage, current, temperature, moisture, DGA,vibrations, dielectric strength, PD,...

    Change taps, operate CBs, adjust valves,

    On-board information archival Operating criteria/Maintenance history/Operational

    history

    Plug & Play

    Embedded intelligence

    Self-monitoring/Self-diagnosis

    Bi-directional communications/Self-initiates

    corrective actions 22

  • 7/30/2019 OSU gridFUTURE Presentation

    23/29

    Sophisticated gridFUTURE

    Customer

    Adapted from EPRI source image

    LGElectronics

    High Demand Period

    Delay wash 2 hours?

    Please respond Yes or No

    FC

    AMI

    23

  • 7/30/2019 OSU gridFUTURE Presentation

    24/29

    gridFUTURE Customer Scenario 2Customers home monitoring & automation system (HMAS) monitors home and

    controls household systems per the occupants pre-selected preferencesand/or voice/electronic overrides.

    Customer approaches home via driveway: HMAS recognizes car, opens garage doorto permit entry.

    Customer exits car: HMAS recognizes customer, closes the garage door, grants entry

    into home and announces customer's arrival to occupants, as well as, occupantspresence and location to customer.

    Customer enters the laundry room: Lights turn on, and the laundry equipment remindshim that a load of laundry awaits washing, which the customer responds to by grantingverbal permission to wash and dry.

    Customer proceeds through the house, the HMAS locationally adjusts lighting,temperature, and audio/visual equipment per the customers preset preferences orvoice commands.

    Suddenly, the HMAS alarms the customer to a dangerous level of carbon monoxidepresent in garage, instructs the car to shutdown engine, secures laundry room externalentry, and opens garage door, to enable fresh air entry

    24

  • 7/30/2019 OSU gridFUTURE Presentation

    25/29

    gridFuture Customer Scenario 3

    Customer with history of heart disease and lives alone has a communications

    enabled implanted heart monitor

    2:17 am: Monitor detects impending heart attack, while customer sleepsunsuspectingly. CApS* dispatches emergency services and transmits EKG tohospital, where it is reviewed by cardiologist.

    2:22 am: Emergency squad arrives at residence. CApS disables security system,grants emergency access, and directs squad to customers location.

    2:35 am: Customer stabilized under cardiologist remote supervision. Placed invehicle for transport to hospital. CApS secures residence, and notifies customersemergency contact of situation in progress.

    2:39 am: Patient rushed into hospital emergency room, and begins to receivetreatment.

    3:19 am: Patient regains consciousness in presence of daughter, and is happy tobe alive!

    * CustomerApplication System. 25

  • 7/30/2019 OSU gridFUTURE Presentation

    26/29

    Energy Utility of the FUTURE

    Real-Time Optimization of Energy

    Production, Delivery & Utilization

    DistributionSubstation

    Commercial

    Industrial

    Residential

    Bulk Generation

    Transmission& Distribution

    TransmissionSubstation

    Gensets, FuelCells, Load

    Management, CHP

    Gensets, Solar, Fuel Cells , Load

    Management, CHP

    Gensets, Solar, Fuel Cells,

    Load Management, CHP

    Imc2

    IGCC- FC Hybrid, Biomass,Wind, Solar, Nuclear, Direct

    Carbon Fuel CellsHeat, Chemicals & Byproducts

    Synfuels & Biofuels

    IndustrialCo-location

    26

  • 7/30/2019 OSU gridFUTURE Presentation

    27/29

    Why?

    Sustainability Reduces centralized infrastructure (G, T&D)

    Improves reliability, security and asset utilization

    More diverse supply

    Bypass grid constraints Located closer to load

    Increase overall efficiency

    Higher base generation efficiency (=60%, fuel to electricity)

    Bypass T&D losses Enables combined heat and power (CHP) on a grand scale

    (adjacent to load)

    Imc2 enables a broad array of capabilities

    27

  • 7/30/2019 OSU gridFUTURE Presentation

    28/29

    28

  • 7/30/2019 OSU gridFUTURE Presentation

    29/29

    29

    John M. Schneider, Dr. [email protected]