OSD Readiness and Training CE2T2 Assessments JAEC Assessment Working Group WJTSC 09-1 23 Mar 2009
-
Upload
patrick-boyer -
Category
Documents
-
view
35 -
download
0
description
Transcript of OSD Readiness and Training CE2T2 Assessments JAEC Assessment Working Group WJTSC 09-1 23 Mar 2009
OSD Readiness and TrainingOSD Readiness and Training
CE2T2 AssessmentsCE2T2 Assessments
JAEC Assessment Working GroupJAEC Assessment Working GroupWJTSC 09-1WJTSC 09-123 Mar 200923 Mar 2009
This briefing is UNCLASSIFIED
Joint Assessment and Enabling Capability
OSD Readiness and Training Policy and Programs
AS OF 17 MAR 2009
WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009
UNCLASSIFIED 2
OSD JAEC CE2T2 Assessment WG
Agenda
0800-0815 Introduction
0815-0845 Meeting objectives & assessment overview
0845-0900 Data collection process
0900-1015 Framework & metrics
Gaps
Improvement plans
Input from community
1015-1100 Way ahead, wrap-up
WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009
UNCLASSIFIED 3
OSD JAEC CE2T2 Assessment WG
Introductions
• Please update the contact list as necessary– Request SIPRNet email for at least one person each
organization– Blank lines on last pages
• Around the room
• Analysts who support JAEC assessment
WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009
UNCLASSIFIED 4
OSD JAEC CE2T2 Assessment WG
Meeting Objectives
• Improve data processes
• Discuss changes to metrics– Changes would have to be approved by leadership
• Identify issues for other meetings– 1-on-1 with JAEC analysts at WJTSC– Other options: monthly update telcon, ad hoc telcon
• This isn’t an IPR – We will focus on process and metrics instead of analysis– Major discussion topics may be noted for other meetings
WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009
UNCLASSIFIED 5
OSD JAEC CE2T2 Assessment WG
CE2T2 Assessment Purpose
Purpose of CE2T2 Assessments
• Communicate goals and performance to members of the
enterprise
• Help all members of the enterprise track performance
• Inform T2 and CE2 leadership of significant trends and the
impact of training programs
• Support key enterprise decision making
• Provide key information on the program to support dialogue
with professional congressional staff members
Enterprise assessment will identify trends across the Services and COCOMs to demonstrate relevance and impact of joint training
Sep 2008 Brief to T2 LeadershipSep 2008 Brief to T2 Leadership
WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009
UNCLASSIFIED 6
OSD JAEC CE2T2 Assessment WG
6
Leadership Priorities
Six leadership priorities focus our assessment:
• Joint training accomplished prior to combat
deployment
• Irregular warfare training
• Whole of government and international training
• Impact of joint training
• Impact of joint training enablers
• Implementation of joint training
WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009
UNCLASSIFIED 7
OSD JAEC CE2T2 Assessment WG
Build Framework to the Enterprise View
Process for funding and
managing CE2T2
Funding of software/hardware enablers for CE2T2
Providing resources for
exercise training
Effectiveness of training in improving mission performance
Exercises accomplished
Setting up exercises that provide training in the priority areas:
- joint - irregular warfare - whole of government - multinational
Individual training accomplished
• Our assessment is focused at the enterprise level - we want to get as close to the top as possible using the best available metric• A metric without the data is not useful
Level of Metric
HIGH
LOW
Ease of Quantifying
HARDEST
EASIEST
Best Sourceof Data
OPERATORS
TRAINERS
PROGRAMMERS
WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009
UNCLASSIFIED 8
OSD JAEC CE2T2 Assessment WG
Assessment Framework & Lead Analysts
Enterprise Priority Analysis Topics Lead Analyst
Joint training accomplished prior to deployment
1. JNTC-accredited unit joint training accomplished prior to deployment Tony Handy
2. Joint Task Force Headquarters staff collective training Tony Handy
3. Joint Task Force Headquarters staff individual training (JKDDC contribution)
Stan Horowitz
Irregular warfare training 4. Irregular warfare and stability operations at Service training centers Jennifer Rausch
Whole of government and international training
5. Whole of government training Tony Handy
6. International participation in training exercises Tony Handy
Impact of joint training7. Enterprise view of joint training outcomes John Morrison
8. CE2T2 impact on qualifying joint officers Stan Horowitz
Impact of joint training enablers
9. Distributed network for joint training John Ross
10. Research and development for joint training Jennifer Rausch
11. Implementation of Joint Training Information Management System John Morrison
12. Implementation of Joint Lessons Learned Information System Tony Handy
Implementation of joint training
13. Impact of CE2T2 on meeting Service event requirementsJohn Morrison &
John Ross
14. Impact of CE2T2 on meeting COCOMs event requirements John Morrison
15. Impact of CE2T2 meeting individual joint training requirements Stan Horowitz
WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009
UNCLASSIFIED 9
OSD JAEC CE2T2 Assessment WG
Data Collection Process
WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009
UNCLASSIFIED 10
OSD JAEC CE2T2 Assessment WG
Data Collection Process
• Goal: use existing data sources to the maximum extent (JTIMS, other sites, deployment schedules, training schedules, etc.)
• Reality: JAEC has found value in Service and COCOM review of data - Verification and Validation (V&V)
• Actions– JAEC continues to gather data approx 1/20, 4/20, 7/20, and 10/20– JAEC emails preliminary data to Services and COCOMs for
review, makes corrections, and establishes business rules
Individual organization concerns – see Mr. Tony Handy
WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009
UNCLASSIFIED 11
OSD JAEC CE2T2 Assessment WG
Reference: JTIMS Event Module Data Elements for CE2T2 Assessment (1)
Data Element Entry Screen JTIMS Role
Training Program
Training Program Name Description tab User Group Lead, Event Manager
Program Sponsoring Command Description tab User Group Lead, Event Manager
JNTC Accredited Description tab User Group Lead, Event Manager
Training Events/Exercises
Event Name Description tab User Group Lead, Event Manager, Event Team Lead
Employment Start Date Details tab User Group Lead, Event Manager, Event Team Lead
Employment End Date Details tab User Group Lead, Event Manager, Event Team Lead
Tasks Trained Training Objective Tab User Group Lead, Event Team Lead
Task Description Training Objective Tab User Group Lead, Event Team Lead
WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009
UNCLASSIFIED 12
OSD JAEC CE2T2 Assessment WG
Reference: JTIMS Event Module Data Elements for CE2T2 Assessment (2)
Data Element Entry Screen JTIMS Role
Training Events/Exercises
UIC Force Tab, Force Provider Interface Force Provider
Participating Unit Name / Agency Name Force Tab, Force Provider Interface Force Provider
Organization Affiliation Force Tab, Force Provider Interface Force Provider
Participating Interagency Name Force Tab, Force Provider Interface Force Provider
Participating Coalition Unit Name Force Tab, Force Provider Interface Force Provider
Affiliation Type Force Tab, Force Provider Interface Force Provider
Was JTEN Used? Simulation tab User Group Lead, Event Team Lead
WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009
UNCLASSIFIED 13
OSD JAEC CE2T2 Assessment WG
Analysis Topics
WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009
UNCLASSIFIED 14
OSD JAEC CE2T2 Assessment WG
Assessment Framework & Lead Analysts
Enterprise Priority Analysis Topics Lead Analyst
Joint training accomplished prior to deployment
1. JNTC-accredited unit joint training accomplished prior to deployment Tony Handy
2. Joint Task Force Headquarters staff collective training Tony Handy
3. Joint Task Force Headquarters staff individual training (JKDDC contribution)
Stan Horowitz
Irregular warfare training 4. Irregular warfare and stability operations at Service training centers Jennifer Rausch
Whole of government and international training
5. Whole of government training Tony Handy
6. International participation in training exercises Tony Handy
Impact of joint training7. Enterprise view of joint training outcomes John Morrison
8. CE2T2 impact on qualifying joint officers Stan Horowitz
Impact of joint training enablers
9. Distributed network for joint training John Ross
10. Research and development for joint training Jennifer Rausch
11. Implementation of Joint Training Information Management System John Morrison
12. Implementation of Joint Lessons Learned Information System Tony Handy
Implementation of joint training
13. Impact of CE2T2 on meeting Service event requirementsJohn Morrison &
John Ross
14. Impact of CE2T2 on meeting COCOMs event requirements John Morrison
15. Impact of CE2T2 meeting individual joint training requirements Stan Horowitz
WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009
UNCLASSIFIED 15
OSD JAEC CE2T2 Assessment WG
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Overall 82.0% 64.9% 62.3% 80.8% 82.1% 77.9% 82.0% 87.1% 77.8%
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1
FY07 FY08 FY09Quarterly
Active Duty Combat Units Target (Annual)
1. JNTC-Accredited Unit Joint Training Accomplished Prior to Deployment
Metric
Percent of units deployed to combat operations that participated in JNTC-accredited Service joint training prior to deploying
Notes:
1.Unit = commanded by an O-5 or above
2.Top-level metric shows active duty combat units, but JAEC also has data for CS and CSS, and RC
Joint training
accomplished
prior to combat
deployment
Irregular
warfare training
Whole of
government
and
international
training
Impact of joint
training
Impact of joint
training
enablers
Implementation
of joint training
FindingsParticipation rate continues to exceed target levels
Potential Future Developments1. Address operational deployments in addition to
combat deployments2. Verify accuracy of RC data for inclusion and analysis
WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009
UNCLASSIFIED 16
OSD JAEC CE2T2 Assessment WG
2. Joint Task Force Headquarters Staff Collective Training
Potential Future DevelopmentExpand analysis to rotational and operational JTF HQ
reporting in DRRS
Joint training
accomplished
prior to combat
deployment
Irregular
warfare training
Whole of
government
and
international
training
Impact of joint
training
Impact of joint
training
enablers
Implementation
of joint training * From the Draft JTF HQ CONOPS: JTF-capable: A Designated Service HQ that has achieved and can sustain a level of readiness to stand up as a JTF HQ, which is acceptable to the supported/assigned Combatant Commander.
Metrics
a. Percent of deployed JTF HQ* that participated in Unified Endeavor (UE) mission readiness exercise (MRX)
b. Status of JTF-capable headquarters reporting readiness in DRRS
*JTF HQ: Joint Task Force Headquarters
Findings
a. 100% of units deployed as rotational JTF HQ participated in UE MRXs
b. Of the 8 certified JTF-capable headquarters:
• 6 have current reports in DRRS • 3 commented that readiness ratings were
verified/certified by performance in training exercises
• 2 stated concern over preserving staff training level and expanding staff and individual training opportunities
WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009
UNCLASSIFIED 17
OSD JAEC CE2T2 Assessment WG
3. Joint Task Force Headquarters Staff Individual Training (JKDDC Contribution)
Metric
Percent of JTF staff receiving theater-focused JKDDC training before deployment
- Initial pilot study addressed CJTF-HOA*
* Combined Joint Task Force - Horn of Africa
Joint training
accomplished
prior to combat
deployment
Irregular
warfare training
Whole of
government
and
international
training
Impact of joint
training
Impact of joint
training
enablers
Implementation
of joint training
Potential Future DevelopmentExpand analysis beyond CJTF-HOA; options include:
•Cooperation of other JTF HQ J1s•Use DMDC data to identify assigned personnel
FindingsInitial findings indicated relatively small percent of CJTF-HOA staff trained in JKDDC; however, more recent findings show dramatic increases
Entire staff Newly-reporting personnel in Q1 FY09Q4
FY08Q1
FY09
Total 273 272 77
JKO Trained 24 78 39
% JKO Trained 9% 29% 51%
WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009
UNCLASSIFIED 18
OSD JAEC CE2T2 Assessment WG
4. Irregular Warfare and Stability Operations at Service Training Centers
Metric
Percent of service units training in irregular warfare and stability operations (IW/SO) at major service training centersNote: Unit = commanded by an O-5 or above
Joint training
accomplished
prior to combat
deployment
Irregular
warfare training
Whole of
government
and
international
training
Impact of joint
training
Impact of joint
training
enablers
Implementation
of joint training
Service FY08 Q1 FY09 Target
Army 100% 100% 90%
Navy 89% 100% 60%
Air Force 100% 100% 75%
Marine Corps 100% 100% 90%
Potential Future DevelopmentsLeave as is?
Findings•Continuing into FY09, Service data indicate training centers exceed targets•Each Service has a different target, driven by the contemporary operating environment.•Percentage of events at Service training centers that included IW/SO:
WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009
UNCLASSIFIED 19
OSD JAEC CE2T2 Assessment WG
Metric
Percentage of joint training events that include participation by interagency personnelNote: events are JNTC-accredited Service training events and COCOM events supported by CE2 or T2 funding
5. Whole of Government Training
Joint training
accomplished
prior to combat
deployment
Irregular
warfare training
Whole of
government
and
international
training
Impact of joint
training
Impact of joint
training
enablers
Implementation
of joint training
Interagency Participation
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1
FY07 FY08 FY09
Aggregated Services COCOMs
Interagency Participation
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1
FY07 FY08 FY09
Aggregated Services COCOMs
Potential Future Developments1. Identify requirements and performance targets (RTPP lead)2. Improve definitions3. JAEC understand each organization’s JTIMS reporting
practices
Findings•General trend has been slightly declining participation•Differences between COCOMs and Services (only recently disaggregated) may represent differing requirements
WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009
UNCLASSIFIED 20
OSD JAEC CE2T2 Assessment WG
6. International Participation in Training Exercises
Metric
Percentage of joint training events that include participation by international personnelNote: events are JNTC-accredited Service training events and COCOM events supported by CE2 or T2 funding
Joint training
accomplished
prior to combat
deployment
Irregular
warfare training
Whole of
government
and
international
training
Impact of joint
training
Impact of joint
training
enablers
Implementation
of joint training
International Participation
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1
FY07 FY08 FY09
Aggregated Services COCOMs
International Participation
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1
FY07 FY08 FY09
Aggregated Services COCOMs
Findings•General trend has been slightly increasing participation•Differences between COCOMs and Services (only recently disaggregated) may represent differing requirements
Potential Future Developments1. Identify requirements and performance targets (RTPP lead)2. Improve definitions3. JAEC understand each organization’s JTIMS reporting
practices
WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009
UNCLASSIFIED 21
OSD JAEC CE2T2 Assessment WG
7. Enterprise View of Joint Training Outcomes
Metricsa. Portion of COCOM tasks trained in COCOM and Service exercises, and training proficiency assessments of performance on those tasks
b. Common strengths and weaknesses across the enterprise
Joint training
accomplished
prior to combat
deployment
Irregular
warfare training
Whole of
government
and
international
training
Impact of joint
training
Impact of joint
training
enablers
Implementation
of joint training
Potential Future DevelopmentAutomate process to provide semi-annual or quarterly updates (JAEC and JTIMS Program Office action)
Findingsa. 48% of JMETs had published assessments in JTIMS (Data manually extracted from COCOM Joint Training Plans (JTPs) published at the end of FY08)
b. Assessments showed some strengths and weaknesses that were common across the COCOMs, as well as some striking deficiencies that were more localSpecific findings available in classified forum
WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009
UNCLASSIFIED 22
OSD JAEC CE2T2 Assessment WG
8. CE2T2 Impact on Qualifying Joint Officers
MetricFraction of Joint Qualified Officer (JQO) points generated by JKDDC-provided individual training
Joint training
accomplished
prior to combat
deployment
Irregular
warfare training
Whole of
government
and
international
training
Impact of joint
training
Impact of joint
training
enablers
Implementation
of joint training
FY 07 FY08
Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Institut. Learning
Distrib. Learning 137 150 164 202 205 216
Experience
Total
Potential Future DevelopmentWorking with JS J1 to complete the chart
Findings•Points awarded through distributed learning up 58% from the third quarter of FY 2007•As of November 2008 163 Joint Qualified Officer Points have been available through JFCOM-certified courses
•129 through institutional courses•34 using distributed learning (1 blended course)•1 point per 40 hours of training•Points are also awarded for joint experience
WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009
UNCLASSIFIED 23
OSD JAEC CE2T2 Assessment WG
9. Distributed Network for Joint Training
MetricJoint Training and Experimentation Network (JTEN) usage in CE2T2 exercises as reflected by the following data (PBR 821)
Joint training
accomplished
prior to combat
deployment
Irregular
warfare training
Whole of
government
and
international
training
Impact of joint
training
Impact of joint
training
enablers
Implementation
of joint training
Potential Future DevelopmentNone planned
Findings•Almost every metric indicates increasing JTEN usage from FY06 to FY08•Prorated Q1 FY09 data (4X) suggests that increases will be sustained into FY09
(Table in backup)
WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009
UNCLASSIFIED 24
OSD JAEC CE2T2 Assessment WG
10. Research and Development for Joint Training
Metrics
Value of R&D programs as determined by the following data (PBRs 718 and 721):
a. Status of accomplishing 13 certifications and 17 assessments (PBR 718)
b. Number of times virtual AC-130 simulation was integrated into National Training Center (NTC), MAGTF Training Center (Mojave Viper), and Joint Readiness Training Center (JRTC) rotations in FY09 (PBR 721)
Joint training
accomplished
prior to combat
deployment
Irregular
warfare training
Whole of
government
and
international
training
Impact of joint
training
Impact of joint
training
enablers
Implementation
of joint training
Potential Future DevelopmentThis is based on PBR measures of effectiveness submitted in 2008
FindingsData are collected and reported by JATTL as part of the PBR process
WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009
UNCLASSIFIED 25
OSD JAEC CE2T2 Assessment WG
11. Implementation of Joint Training Information Management System
Joint training
accomplished
prior to combat
deployment
Irregular
warfare training
Whole of
government
and
international
training
Impact of joint
training
Impact of joint
training
enablers
Implementation
of joint training
Findingsa. All COCOM CE2T2 events in
JTIMS, minority of events provide training objective or audience data
b.• 6 of the 10 COCOMs had Approved
Training Assessments in JTIMS• ~ 40% of Core Mission, Command-
Level JMETs have published assessments
(Tables in backup)
Metrics a. Percentage of COCOM CE2T2 events that provide specific data* in JTIMS
b. Percentage of COCOMs publishing assessments in JTIMS
* Data: training objective or audienceNote: JTIMS is funded by PBR 11001.
Potential Future DevelopmentNone planned
WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009
UNCLASSIFIED 26
OSD JAEC CE2T2 Assessment WG
12. Implementation of Joint Lessons Learned Information System
Metric/Statistics• Use of the Joint Lessons Learned Information
System (JLLIS) as indicated by the following data:– Since 1 Oct 07, 27 organizations have signed up to
use JLLIS• Joint Staff 1• COCOMs 10• 3 Services + NGB 4• CSA-4, Interag’cy-3 7• Other organizations 5
– Number of JLLIS Users
– Number of Active Lessons
Joint training
accomplished
prior to combat
deployment
Irregular
warfare training
Whole of
government
and
international
training
Impact of joint
training
Impact of joint
training
enablers
Implementation
of joint training
Sep 07 Sep 08 CY09 Q1 CY09 Q2NIPR 9,584 23,456 28,550SIPR 5,607 10,475 15,623
Sep 07 Sep 08 CY09 Q1 CY09 Q2NIPR 7,244 25,800 29,855SIPR 16,671 89,462 99,328
Findings•Trend analysis requires dedicated analysts; currently no automated tool.•The USMC Center for Lessons Learned, USAF, and USN have been instrumental in the outstanding progress JLLIS has made over the past 18 months.
Potential Future Developments•By Oct 09, JLLIS should be FOC with all COCOMs using and sharing data via JLLIS and all legacy data imported into the system.•As JLLIS establishes linkages between its stakeholders and other systems, the current statistics can be expanded to provide better metrics on the integration of JLLIS data in DOTMLPF programs.
(PBR 11007)
WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009
UNCLASSIFIED 27
OSD JAEC CE2T2 Assessment WG
FY2008
Service events impacted by JTCP
JCTP-supported participation in other-Service events
Army 0 7
Navy 9 6
Marine Corps
5 4
Air Force 9 7
13. Impact of CE2T2 on Meeting Service Event Requirements
Metrics
a. Percent of training objectives* addressed by JNTC-accredited Service training programs
b. Number of events impacted by the Joint Training Coordination Program (JTCP) (PBRs 2306, 921, 903B, and 903A)
Joint training
accomplished
prior to combat
deployment
Irregular
warfare training
Whole of
government
and
international
training
Impact of joint
training
Impact of joint
training
enablers
Implementation
of joint training
Findingsa. 29 objectives (24%) are addressed by JNTC-accredited tasks trained in program
b.
Potential Future DevelopmentTBD
*JFCOM JTP identified 121 unique training objectives, derived from 16 training priorities identified in OSD published guidance. Each objective comprises one or more UJT, relevant conditions, and a training standard.
WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009
UNCLASSIFIED 28
OSD JAEC CE2T2 Assessment WG
14. Impact of CE2T2 on Meeting COCOM Event Requirements
Metric
Percent of COCOM training requirements addressed by CE2T2 training events
Joint training
accomplished
prior to combat
deployment
Irregular
warfare training
Whole of
government
and
international
training
Impact of joint
training
Impact of joint
training
enablers
Implementation
of joint training
Potential Future DevelopmentTBD
Findings•“Training requirements” defined by command-level JMETs in COCOM JMETLs•The results indicate that the 25 CE2T2 events that occurred in Q1 FY2009 trained about ¼ of the COCOMs’ training requirements as defined
WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009
UNCLASSIFIED 29
OSD JAEC CE2T2 Assessment WG
15. Impact of CE2T2 on Meeting Individual Joint Training Requirements
Joint training
accomplished
prior to combat
deployment
Irregular
warfare training
Whole of
government
and
international
training
Impact of joint
training
Impact of joint
training
enablers
Implementation
of joint training
Metric
Percent of COCOM joint mission essential tasks (JMETs) addressed by JKDDC courseware – command and supporting
End of FY07
End of FY08
Q1 FY09
Number of JMETs addressed by JKDDC courses
524 (est.)
860 878
Percent of JMETs addressed by JKDDC courses
15% (est.)
24% 24%
Potential Future DevelopmentTBD
Findings
LAST ANALYSISLAST ANALYSISTOPIC SLIDETOPIC SLIDE
WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009
UNCLASSIFIED 30
OSD JAEC CE2T2 Assessment WG
CE2T2 Assessment Way Ahead
Next 60 days
1. Exploit existing qualitative data sources– Examples: News You Can Use, JNTC SE Event Summaries
2. Expand use of DRRS – Training-related comments
– Pending business intelligence tool should help
3. Publish planned documents– Collection plan: “reference” for the community
– DoD Instruction: assessment portion
– If necessary, JSAP as a temporary measure until DoDI is published (AO-to-AO)
4. Develop or refine performance targets where appropriate– Collaborate with community, approved by leadership
Longer term
Pursue identified Potential Future Developments
Prepare and vet FY2009 annual assessment; initial draft at WJTSC 09-2
WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009
UNCLASSIFIED 31
OSD JAEC CE2T2 Assessment WG
Questions?Questions?
Contacts:
David Baranek, JAEC analyst: [email protected]
Tony Handy, JAEC JTS Specialist: [email protected]
John Ross, JAEC analyst at JFCOM: [email protected]
31
WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009
UNCLASSIFIED 32
OSD JAEC CE2T2 Assessment WG
FY09 Q1 Summary Assessment (1)
• Joint training accomplished prior to deployment– Unit participation in accredited training events continues to
exceed goals– Deployed JTF HQ staff training (MRXs) appears to meet
requirements– Comments in DRRS on collective training for JTF-capable HQ
reveal concern over maintaining currency
• Irregular warfare and stability operations training– Training exceeds goals
• Whole of government and international training– OSD(RTPP), Joint Staff J7 (JETD) working on developing
definitions and requirements
Presented at T2 JIPT, 23 Feb 2009Presented at T2 JIPT, 23 Feb 2009
WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009
UNCLASSIFIED 33
OSD JAEC CE2T2 Assessment WG
FY09 Q1 Summary Assessment (2)
• Impact of joint training– Results showed some strengths and weaknesses that were
common across the COCOMs, as well as some striking deficiencies that were more local – details are classified
– JKDDC/JS J7 contribution to Joint Qualified Officer program is increasing
• Impact of joint training enablers– Almost every metric indicates increasing Joint Training and
Experimentation Network (JTEN) usage since FY2006– Initial data from Joint Lessons Learned Information System
(JLLIS) show steep increase in number of users and active lessons
– Other metrics rely on data not yet available, including PBR measures of effectiveness
Presented at T2 JIPT, 23 Feb 2009Presented at T2 JIPT, 23 Feb 2009
WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009
UNCLASSIFIED 34
OSD JAEC CE2T2 Assessment WG
FY09 Q1 Summary Assessment (3)
• Implementation of joint training– JNTC-accredited Service training programs addressed 24% of
the 121 training objectives identified by USJFCOM* – CE2T2 events in Q1 FY09 trained about ¼ of command-level
JMETs in COCOM JMETLs– JKDDC online resources addressed 24% of JMETs in COCOM
JMETLs, an increase from 15% end of FY07
*The JFCOM Joint Training Plan, Tab H, lists 16 priorities derived from strategic guidance and COCOM inputs, divided into 121 training objectives. The objectives themselves comprise one or more UJTL tasks, relevant conditions, and a training standard.
Presented at T2 JIPT, 23 Feb 2009Presented at T2 JIPT, 23 Feb 2009
WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009
UNCLASSIFIED 35
OSD JAEC CE2T2 Assessment WG
Analysis Topic 2b: Joint Task Force Headquarters Staff Collective TrainingAssessment Reporting by JTF-Capable Headquarters
COCOMJTF Capable HQ /
CommandService
UICJoint UIC
JTF HQ Task(s) in
METL?DRRS Assessment
Date
AFRICOMSouthern European Task Force (formerly EUCOM)
WJHEAA Yes 15 DEC 2008
EUCOM 6th Fleet N57042 Yes 24 JUL 2006
EUCOM 3rd Air Force FFDJ30 No No
JFCOM 2nd Fleet / JTF-South N08961 DJ2C2F Yes 20 JAN 2009
PACOM COMPACFLT / JTF 519 N00070 DJ5519 Yes 13 JAN 2009
PACOM 7th Fleet / JTF 507 N57024 DJ5507 Yes 9 JAN 2009
NORTHCOM 5th Army / USARNORTH WJMHAA Yes 6 JAN 2009
SOUTHCOM 6th Army / USARSOUTH WJMWAA Yes 15 DEC 2008
Plan to certify five additional headquarters in FY2009: 7 th Army, III MEF, 20th Support Command, 5th Fleet/USNAVCENT, 3rd Army/USARCENT
WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009
UNCLASSIFIED 36
OSD JAEC CE2T2 Assessment WG
Analysis Topic 9. Distributed Network for Joint Training
Metric FY06 FY07 FY08 Q1 FY09
Total Events 40 69 88 26
COCOM Events 12 28 41 15
Service Events 28 41 47 11
CE2T2 Events 31 45 70 23
Non-CE2T2 Events 9 24 18 3
JTEN Hours Used 10,923 17,376 26,683 7638
CE2T2 Hours 9,831 15,638 24,464
Non-CE2T2 Hours 1,092 1,738 2,219
Participating Sites (Incl Hub Sites)
219 404 432 149
First-time Use Sites 5 1 5 1
WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009
UNCLASSIFIED 37
OSD JAEC CE2T2 Assessment WG
Analysis Topic 11a. Implementation of Joint Training Information Management System
Percentage of COCOM CE2T2 Events that Provide Certain Data in JTIMS
Type of Event
FY 08 Events Q1 FY 09 Events
Total Events
No. / % with Trng Tasks or
AudienceTotal
Events
No. / with Trng Tasks or Audience
COCOM CE2T2
128 45 / 35% 25 11 / 44%
USAF Accredited
7 6 / 86%
USN Accredited
3 3 / 100%
WJTSC 09-1, 23 Mar 2009
UNCLASSIFIED 38
OSD JAEC CE2T2 Assessment WG
Analysis Topic 11b. Implementation of Joint Training Information Management System
Approved Training Assessments in JTIMS
COCOMAssessments in
JTIMSCore CMD
METs in JMETL
Core CMD JMETS Assessed in
JTIMSPercent
Assessed
AFRICOM 9 0 0%
CENTCOM 11 10 91%
EUCOM 10 10 100%
JFCOM 15 0 0%
NORTHCOM 11 11 100%
PACOM 12 0 0%
SOCOM 15 0 0%
SOUTHCOM 10 2 20%
STRATCOM 7 5 71%
TRANSCOM 6 6 100%
Totals 106 44 42%
• Ref: CJCSI 3500.01E, dated 31 May 2008, enclosure D, Joint Training Guidance, paragraph 2e• JTIMS: Joint Training Information Management System
As of 5 Jan 2009