Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

20
Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow Maintaining quality the wiki way

description

Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow. Maintaining quality the wiki way. Peer review. Helps to ensure quality, credibility, accuracy, clinical value of content Establishes a reliable body of research and knowledge, sets standards for a discipline - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

Page 1: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

OrthopaediaPeer Review Workflow

Maintaining quality the wiki way

Page 2: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

Peer review

• Helps to ensure quality, credibility, accuracy, clinical value of content

• Establishes a reliable body of research and knowledge, sets standards for a discipline

• Gives authors the opportunity to correct weaknesses identified by peer reviewers

• Prevents dissemination of unsubstantiated claims, faulty interpretations, irrelevant findings, personal biases

Page 3: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

Content development and quality

• Editorial Boards from subspeciality associations oversee the content development and maintenance of quality using the Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow Engine

Page 4: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

Case example: AOFAS & Foot and Ankle Section

Page 5: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

Labels used for tracking, activation of peer review workflow

• “aofas” label – article is part of the AOFAS content partnership collection

• “aofas_review” – article added to the AOFAS Peer Review Workflow

• “aofas_dev” – article under development by AOFAS member

aofas_review label can only be removed by an Orthopaedia Administratoraofas_review label can only be removed by an Orthopaedia Administrator

Page 6: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

User groups created for “editors”and “reviewers”

Page 7: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

AOFAS peer review workflow

aofas-reviewers

aofas-editors

authors

Page 8: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

Peer review workflow engine

• Workflow can be customized and configured to meet specific needs of subspecialty society

Page 9: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

Draft

• A newly contributed article is labeled as a “Draft,” triggering peer review

Page 10: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

Under review

• An article that moves to “Under Review” is “locked” – it can only be edited by the AOFAS Reviewers

Page 11: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

Reviewed

• An article that has been reviewed goes back to the author for revisions recommended by the reviewers or is submitted to Editor-in-Chief

Page 12: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

Published

• Once the Editor-in-Chief is satisfied, the article is published

Page 13: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

Peer review workflow

Workflow process shows states of peer review process and dates. All edits and versions are tracked as an activity log.

Page 14: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

Workflow report

Workflow reports track the states of articles.

Page 15: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

Workflow emails

Page 16: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

Notifications

By clicking on “Watch Page Family,” the AOFAS Editorial Board is notified of any changes made to the articles.

Page 17: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

Call for articles

• Articles written according to a template to ensure uniformity

• Potential authors asked to contact Editor-in-Chief• Allows control over how articles are developed

Page 18: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

Article under development

• Once an author has been approved to write on a topic, the page is reserved for that author and the article is labeled “Under Development”

Page 19: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

Disclaimer

• Disclaimer for the section clearly indicates that changes are subject to modification or deletion

Page 20: Orthopaedia Peer Review Workflow

Disclaimer

• Disclaimer appears on articles developed under content partnership