Orlando
-
Upload
mohamad-asghar-khan -
Category
Documents
-
view
29 -
download
2
description
Transcript of Orlando
Whither Nursing Models?
Niall McCrae RCN Nurse Education Conference, Harrogate
February 2012
Florence Nightingale School of Nursing & Midwifery
McCrae N (2011): Whither nursing models? The value of nursing theory in
the context of evidence-based practice and multidisciplinary health care.
Journal of Advanced Nursing, 68: 222-229
Professional Development of Nursing
Basic care
(‘handmaiden’)
Training in
anatomy and
physiology
Professional
certificate
and register
Nursing
theory
Diploma /
degree
qualification
Apprenticeship Higher education
Vocation Profession
Nursing has improved academic status, expansion
of roles (e.g. prescribing), more autonomy, but...
• has not developed a specialised knowledge base
• lacks infrastructure to conduct research
• professionalisation not fully recognised / desired
Nursing as Interpersonal Relationship
• First theory of nursing, published 1952
• Based on interpersonal relations theory of Harry Stack Sullivan
• Relationship is medium for all nursing care
• Shift from ‘doing things to people’ to therapeutic partnership
• Highlighted nurse’s attitude and need for self-awareness
Overlapping stages of therapeutic relationship
ORIENTATION
IDENTIFICATION
EXPLOITATION
RESOLUTION
Hildegard Peplau (1909-1999)
Psychodynamic nursing is being able to understand one’s own behaviour
to help others identify felt recoveries, and to apply principles of human
relations to the problems that arise at all levels of experience
H Peplau
Dorothea Orem (1914-2007)
Nursing: Concepts of Practice (1971)
• Self-care is human regulatory function
• Unlike physiological processes, it must be learned
• Influenced by individual motivation and social norms
• Illness may impede self-care capacity
• Factors in self-care capacity: age, gender,
developmental state, family, culture and resources
• Nursing directed at self-care deficit, helping patient to
regain ability and knowledge to perform self-care
• Most cited model in nursing research
Theory of Self-Care Deficit
Nursing Process
• ‘Nursing process’ introduced by psychiatric nurse Ida Orlando
(The Dynamic Nurse-Patient Relationship, 1961)
• Orlando concerned that nursing activity was prompted by medical
direction and procedural rules rather than patient needs
• Nursing described as interpersonal process: behaviour of patient,
reaction of nurse, nursing actions for patient’s benefit
Developed as problem-solving approach: -
1. Assessment
2. Planning
3. Implementation
4. Evaluation
Roper, Logan & Tierney Model of Nursing
Nursing process applied comprehensively to activities of daily
living (building on Virginia Henderson’s work in 1950s)
1. maintaining a safe environment
2. communicating
3. breathing
4. eating and drinking
5. eliminating
6. personal cleansing and dressing
7. controlling body temperature
8. mobilising
9. working and playing
10. expressing sexuality
11. sleeping
12. dying
Diversification of Nursing Models
NEEDS-ORIENTATED (Henderson, Orem, Roper-Logan-Tierney)
• Rationale: biopsychosocial needs covered comprehensively with
clear plan for nursing intervention
• Criticism: compartmentalisation, mechanistic, prioritising of needs
lower in hierarchy to neglect of individual preferences, needs
determined by nurse rather than by patient
INTERACTIONIST (Peplau, Barker)
• Rationale: nursing is interpersonal process between patient and
nurse, therapeutic use of self, focus on meanings and motives
• Criticism: neglect of physical health, denial of environmental
constraints
HOLISTIC (Roy, Rogers)
• Rationale: based on systems theory, patient to regain equilibrium
and harmony with environment
• Criticism: complexity of concepts beyond ‘common sense’
Meleis (1985)
Demise of Nursing Models
• Despite featuring prominently in training in 1970s and 1980s,
models of nursing have faded from nursing discourse
• Major criticism was failure of models to bridge theory-practice
gap, as demonstrated in comparative study by Griffiths (1998)
• Holistic, patient-centred intent lost in rigid application, jargon
and documentation
• Opposition to nursing models initially a postmodern response
(Reed, 1995): nursing is intuitive and cannot be reduced to
determinist theory
• Later opposition from empiricists (Gournay, 2001): nursing
theory has not satisfied doctrine of evidence-based practice
• Pursuit of esoteric theoretical framework for nursing seen as
futile and irrelevant endeavour in context of multidisciplinary
healthcare
Arguments against Nursing Theory
1. Nursing eludes definition
2. Lack of prescription for practice
3. Limited professional demarcation and autonomy
4. Incompatibility with evidence-based practice
5. Irrelevance to modern healthcare
Arguments and Counterarguments
1. Definition of Nursing
• Generation of theory arose from search for definition of nursing
• Key stage in development of discipline: enabled nursing to
create curricula independent of medical direction
• Broad principles such as holistic ethos have constancy, but
detail of nursing practice evolves with flux in healthcare systems
and society
• Theory is iterative process: while it grows it adapts
• Conceptual clarity necessary but pursuit of scientific precision
may be unrealistic: inflexibility leads to redundancy
A rigorous and exact delineation of nursing as a role and as a
scientific discipline is necessary specifically when it is used
as the conceptual basis for the development of nursing’s
theoretical knowledge Kim (2000)
Arguments and Counterarguments
2. Prescription for Practice
• Theory should guide practice, but utilisation limited
• Too discursive: Newman’s ‘expanding consciousness’ and Rogers’
‘dynamic energy fields’ deviate from contemporary nursing discourse
• Or too mechanistic: Roper, Logan & Tierney model was good training
tool, but in practice tended to be applied ritualistically (McCrae, 1992)
• However, faults may be in application rather than in design
• Applying theory requires judgment as well as action: nursing needs
‘knowledgeable doers’ to integrate theory and practice
(McCaugherty, 1992)
• Ability of nurses to use theory may be boosted by development of
graduate profession and advanced practice
When I see models, I see documentation Nurse interviewee (Wimpenny, 2002)
Arguments and Counterarguments
3. Professional Demarcation and Autonomy
• Nursing lacks autonomy of more powerful professions
• Professional and societal prejudice: traditional (and lingering) idea
that nurses merely follow doctors’ instructions and provide basic care
• What is value of theory if nursing is under de facto medical and
administrative control?
• Nursing-specific theory may be perceived as counteracting
multidisciplinary ethos
• Each discipline has own training, culture and outlook, thus makes
unique contribution to healthcare
• Multidisciplinary system is argument for nursing theory
• Nursing should have theoretical rationale for its specific function (not
simply filling gaps left by other disciplines)
• Most nursing care occurs in one-to-one relationship: this provides
context for theoretical framework
• What are nurses thinking and doing in interaction: is there a purpose?
• Nursing borrows heavily from knowledge of other disciplines, e.g.
psychology in understanding interpersonal relations
• CBT is standardised intervention: but do psychologist and nurse
bring something different to therapeutic table?
Deferent Knowledge
On a visceral level there seems something
wrong (if not blasphemous) about a nursing
article constructing relationship elements
from a psychology text
Perraud et al (2006)
Arguments and Counterarguments
4. Compatibility with Evidence-Based Practice
• Evidence-based practice is moral, professional and ethical imperative
(Cameron et al, 2005)
• But whose evidence?
• Reductionism dismantles human complexity into measurable concepts
• Emphasis on causal relationships and predictive outcomes rather than
humanistic process of caring
• Empathy has been much studied and categorised, but to engage in
patient’s world requires intuitive, humanistic approach honed by
professional training and experience
• Essence of nursing devalued by empiricist dogma
The evidence-based movement in health sciences is
outrageously exclusionary and dangerously normative Holmes et al (2006)
• So many models, so little testing
• Barnum (1998) appealed for systematic intervention, but difficult to
do this at broader level of theory
• Nursing theories fail Karl Popper’s test of falsifiability
• Theories emphasising interpersonal function of nursing (e.g. Peplau)
are durable and applicable to diverse practice situations
• Caring is phenomenological whole greater than sum of parts
• Comprehensive theory encompasses art and science of nursing, with
humanistic principles at core
• Beware notion that practices with best evidence are best practices!
Nursing Models and Evidence The art of nursing has been characterised by a humanistic
philosophy which values personal meaning, subjectivity and
understanding. At the same time, in attempts to become scientific,
there has been an acceptance of notions of science which are
primarily based in a positivistic, empirico-analytical paradigm.
JF Playle (1995)
Theory Development
Theory development is progression
through four functions of theory
(Walker & Avant, 1995): -
1. Describe
2. Explain
3. Predict
4. Control
However, prediction and control not
always feasible or desirable
Empiricist tendency to regard process
as descriptive and outcomes as
explanatory – but this could be
reversed
Theory in the humanities may be
likened to the growth of a tree. It
first appears as a perishable
sapling, but if the soil is fertile and
the surroundings accommodating,
and it is not eaten away or
ravaged by frost or drought, it
develops a hardy stem and
gradually becomes a young tree.
As it branches ever outwards from
a solid trunk, it attracts nesting
birds and becomes a prominent
feature of the environment. No
structure is permanent, but must
evolve with a changing world.
Barbara Carper (1978) described four domains of nursing
knowledge: -
1. Empirics
2. Aesthetics
3. Personal
4. Ethics
Jacobs-Kramer and Chinn (1988) developed this typology into a
model of nursing knowledge, with three dimensions of how
knowledge is: -
1. Created
2. Expressed
3. Assessed
Nurses should be able to articulate how knowledge is attained,
applied and evaluated (not all-or-nothing empiricism)
Different Ways of Knowing
Arguments and Counterarguments
5. Relevance to Modern Healthcare
• Common criticisms of nursing in media and society: trainees spending
too long studying and not enough time at bedside; nurses parked in
office on computer
• Ever-increasing amount of research and policy to master: a theoretical
framework for nursing may help to make sense of new knowledge
• Theory may provide rationale for more frequent and meaningful
engagement with patients (not just a chat, but therapeutic support or
problem-solving)
• Potentially, theory could guide nursing response to sociopolitical
controversies that cannot be resolved by scientific evidence alone (e.g.
assisted dying)
• Theory may contribute to greater input by nurses in research,
particularly on nursing interventions
• Magnet accreditation programme has encouraged fresh thinking on
theoretical foundations for nursing
Conclusions
Professional development requires differentiation of knowledge
and skills from other disciplines
Specific nursing theory may become more important in
multidisciplinary system where nurses must articulate and justify
their role
To bridge theory-practice gap, lessons must be learned from
previous experience with nursing models
As a corrective to doctrine of evidence-based practice, theory
should encompass caring (art) and technique (science) of nursing