Orissa Integrated Irrigated Agriculture and Water ... · i Department of Water Resources (DoWR)...

Social Monitoring Report

This report has been submitted to ADB by the Project Management Unit (OIIAWMIP), Bhubaneswar and is made publicly available in accordance with ADB’s Public Communications Policy (2011). It does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB.

This social monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

Project Number: 38411-043 June 2017 Period: July 2016 – December 2016

IND: Orissa Integrated Irrigated Agriculture and Water Management Investment Program (OIIAWMIP)- Project 2 Subproject: HLC-Range-1 (0-10 km) Mahanadi North Division, Cuttack

Submitted by:

Project Management Unit (OIIAWMIP), Bhubaneswar

i

Department of Water Resources (DoWR)

Project Management Unit (PMU)

Orissa Integrated Irrigated Agriculture and

Water Management Investment Programme (OIIAWMIP)

(Loan No. 3265)

Internal Monitoring Report on Implementation of Resettlement Plan of

HLC-Range-1 (0-10 km) Mahanadi North Division, Cuttack

July 2016 to December 2016

assisted by

Institutional Strengthening and Project Management Consultants (ISPMC)

Hydrosult, Division of SNC- Lavalin Inc.

in association with

Sutra Consulting Pvt. Ltd., SBH Consultants Pvt. Ltd and N.K. Buildcon Pvt. Ltd

ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF TABLES ...........................................................................................................................ii LIST OF FIGURES: ........................................................................................................................ii LIST OF ANNEXURE: .................................................................................................................ii

Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 4

Chapter-1: Introduction ................................................................................................................. 5

1.1 Project Background and Description ................................................................................. 5

1.2 Objectives of the Report .................................................................................................... 5

1.3 Purpose of the Report ........................................................................................................ 6

1.4 Social Safeguard Categorization ........................................................................................ 6

Chapter-2: Impacts ......................................................................................................................... 7

2.1 Impact on Land, Structure and Livelihood ................................................................... 7

2.2 Impact on Common Property Resources (CPRs) .......................................................... 8

Chapter 3: Compensation & Assistance ................................................................................... 10

3.1 Status of Missing APs and Structures not found during the CSO survey................. 12

3.2 Compensation, relocation or protection of CPRs ........................................................ 12

Chapter 4: Consultations and Disclosures ............................................................................... 13

Chapter 5: Grievances Redress Mechanism ............................................................................ 15

Chapter 6: Institutional Arrangements ..................................................................................... 17

Chapter 7: Compliance of Resettlement Framework, 2015 through CAP ........................ 19

Chapter 8: Conclusion and Recommendations ....................................................................... 20

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1: Package wise Coverage details of APs ............................................................. 8

Table 2: Type of Common Property Resources (CPRs) ................................................. 8

Table 3 : Summary of disbursement of Compensation and Other Allowances ............ 11

Table 4: Disbursements made by Type of Assistance to APs (31 December 2016) .... 12

Table 5: Number of Consultations Organized with APs ................................................ 14

Table 6: Package-wise number and type of Grievances ............................................... 16

Table 7: Component wise Approved and Revised Estimate ......................................... 19

Table 8: Assessment of social safeguards issues and recommendation ..................... 20

LIST OF FIGURES:

Figure 1: Grievance Redress Process ........................................................................... 16

Figure 2: Organizational Chart for Managing the Social Safeguard Issues .................. 18

LIST OF ANNEXURE:

Annexure 1: Summary Status of Disbursement paid to APs - 31 December 2016 ...... 21

Annexure 2: Status of Civil Works Contract in HLC-R-1 Canal Division (0-10 km) ...... 27

Internal Monitoring Report-HLC-R-1, (0- 10 km) - Dec 2016

RS-ISPMC 3

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB- Asian Development Bank AHHs- Affected Households AUs- Affected Units BPL- Below Poverty Line BSR- Basic Schedule of Rates CPSs- Common Property Structures CSO- Civil Society Organisation DC- District Collector DOWR- Department of Water Resources EA- Executing Agency EES- Encroachment Enumeration Survey FGD- Focus Group Discussion GOI- Government of India GRC- Grievance Redress Committee ha- Hectare HH- Household IA- Implementing Agency IMEA- Independent Monitoring and Evaluation Agency NGO- Non-Government Organizations NIA- Net Irrigated Area NRRP- National Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy, OBC- Other Backward Caste OIIAWMIP- Orissa Integrated Irrigated Agriculture and Water Management Investment Program ORRP- Orissa Resettlement and Rehabilitation Policy OWRCP- Orissa Water Resources Consolidation Project PD- Project Director PIM- Participatory Irrigation Management PMU- Project Management Unit P-P- Public Property PRO- Project Resettlement Officer RF- Resettlement Framework RP- Resettlement Plan RO- Resettlement Officer RS- Resettlement Specialist SC- Scheduled Caste SGO- State Government of Orissa SIA- Social Impact Assessment SIO- Subproject Implementation Office SMR- Social Monitoring Report SPS- Safeguard Policy Statement SRO- Subproject Resettlement Officer ST- Scheduled Tribe ToR- Terms of Reference WB- World Bank WUA- Water Users Association


RS-ISPMC 4

Executive Summary

1. The Government of Orissa (GoO), with the financial assistance from Asian Development Bank (ADB) in form of a multi-tranche financing facility (MFF), decided to strengthen lending approach over a span of eight years, aims to reduce rural poverty levels in the State by improving agriculture sector productivity and enhancing rural incomes. It is estimated that the OIIAWMIP will cover to enhance productivity and sustainability of existing 6 major and 9 medium irrigation schemes covering 190,000 ha (NIA), and about 1,400 minor lift irrigation schemes covering up to 30,000 ha with participatory irrigation management (PIM) in four river basin i.e. Subarnarekha, Burhabalanga, Baitarani and Brahmani basins and part of the Mahanadi delta. Most of the subproject works will be limited to rehabilitation and improvement of the existing irrigation system and will not involve acquisition of private land. 2. The Executing Agency (EA) for the Investment Program is the Project Management Unit (PMU) under the Water Resource Department (DoWR), Government of Orissa. The Project Management Unit (PMU), headed by a Project Director, is implementing Resettlement Plans (RP) through the Executive Engineer, Mahanadi North Division, Cuttack. 3. Survey data revealed that out of 124 Affected Persons (APs), 108 APs accepted the notice and signed the ID card. Total 28 Common Property Resources (CPRs) enumerated covering all packages in HLC Range 1 under Mahanadi North Division. A total of 16 APs could not be located/ traced during CSO physical verification in the subproject. 4. Out of 108 APs, 97 APs have received their assistance and compensation up to reporting period while payment for 11 APs are under process. 5. Implementation of RP has undertaken in HLC Range-1 mainly in mobilization, motivation, participation and community awareness. Life Academy of Vocational Studies (LAVS) has been engaged as civil society organisation (CSO) to implement the social safeguard requirements and to assist the SIO (EE) in implementing RPs 6. A grievance redress mechanism has been established in the project and District Level Committee (DLC) set up to monitor project implementation in the subproject. During this reporting period of past 6 months, out of total 41 grievances were received 27 grievances resolved. Rest 14 grievances are generally related to issues like inclusion of name in the entitlement matrix and demanding for revaluation of affected structures. These grievances were resolved by the EE in a congenial, transparent and impartial manner, as and when received. The grievances submitted to the Sub collector for consideration and decision will be communicated to the APs shortly during the course of implementation. 7. This monitoring report covers information/date of the RP implementation up to 31 December 2016.


RS-ISPMC 5

Chapter-1: Introduction

1.1 Project Background and Description 8. The Orissa Integrated Irrigated Agriculture and Water Management Investment

Program (OIIAWMIP), being funded by the Asian Development Bank (ADB)

through the multi-tranche financing facility (MFF) lending approach, aims to

reduce rural poverty levels in the State by improving agriculture sector

productivity and enhancing rural incomes.

9. It is estimated that the OIIAWMIP will cover to enhance productivity and

sustainability of existing 6 major and 9 medium irrigation schemes covering

190,000 ha (NIA), and about 1,400 minor lift irrigation schemes covering up to

30,000 ha with participatory irrigation management (PIM) in four river basin i.e.

Subarnarekha, Burhabalanga, Baitarani and Brahmani basins and part of the

Mahanadi delta. Most of the subproject works are limited to rehabilitation and

improvement of the existing irrigation system and not involve acquisition of

private land.

10. As all infrastructure works will be implemented within the right-of-way (RoW) of

the canals (and drains), involuntary resettlement impacts are limited to losses

that may be incurred by squatters. Encroachment in the right-of-way (RoW) of

canal was assessed using field inspections along the main canal, and

discussions with selected affected persons (APs) and DOWR field staffs.

Existing structures along the main canal included huts, shops, sheds built within

the RoW of the main canal.

11. The renovation work under the HLC Range 1 subproject involves strengthening

and widening of the existing embankment of almost 10 km as well as bank

protection work and aims at addressing the key issues and challenges faced by

the people of the region in terms of loss of life and property caused by the

annual flooding. The total distance under HLC Range 1 sub-project covering a

distance of 10 km administered by Nutang sub-division under Mahanadi North

Division will be strengthened to provide irrigation to 13,790 ha benefitting 112

villages.

12. The project would entail loss of assets and livelihoods of people settled (all non

titleholders) on either side of the existing embankment. The asset loss to these

affected households is mainly in terms of loss of residential, commercial as

well as Common Property Resources (CPRs). There is no agriculture land

that would be affected by the project.

1.2 Objectives of the Report

13. Main objectives of internal monitoring report is to assess the disbursement


RS-ISPMC 6

status of compensation and resettlement implementation are: (i) Verifying

internal monitoring results; (ii) Checking implementation of actual

compensation and resettlement to examine whether the project RP policies are

complied with or not; (iii) Evaluating efficiency, impacts and stability of

resettlement activities; (iv) Recommending necessary adjustments for

implementation of resettlement for the successive components of the Project.

1.3 Purpose of the Report 14. The purpose of monitoring Report is to analyse periodically over the total

implementation period of the project to comply with the approved Involuntary

Resettlement (IR) Plan. PMU has the responsibility to oversee the

implementation and monitoring of social safeguards issues of the subproject. As

usual, this report covered resettlement and social safeguard monitoring results

to comply with the spirit of ADB policy to ‘enhance stakeholders trust’ in and

ability to engage with ADB, and thereby increase the development impact (of

projects) in which disclosure of safeguard monitoring is a prominent aspect.

This report covers Social Monitoring, addressing all the issues related with

social safeguards, with reference to the progress achieved and current status

of reporting period.

1.4 Social Safeguard Categorization 15. ADB's classification system: Prior to civil works implementation, all the

subprojects selected for construction or developments are to be screened and

classified using ADB's classification system as follows:

� Category A: Subprojects proposed for construction or development, will fall

under this category, if, it caused a significant involuntary resettlement impacts

with a physical displacement of 200 or more persons from their residences, or

200 or more persons lose 10% or more of their productive or income

generating assets, or more persons or 200 or more persons experience a

combination of both.

� Category B: Any proposed subproject that includes involuntary resettlement

impacts but are not deemed significant considering loss of shelter/houses or

productive or income generating assets will be considered for category B.

� Category C: A proposed subproject that has no involuntary resettlement

impact.

16. All the sub projects come under “Category A” based on the definition given in

the ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement, 2009 (SPS) respectively. It is

confirmed that there are no Indigenous People (IP), no private land acquisition

issues noticed during the survey. The project involves significant displacement

and loss of livelihood, for which they would be compensated as specified in the

approved Resettlement Plan.


RS-ISPMC 7

Chapter-2: Impacts 2.1 Impact on Land, Structure and Livelihood

17. It has been stated earlier that HLC-R-1 subproject are classified as category

‘A’ for involuntary resettlement in considerations of the ADB’s Involuntary

Resettlement Policy. Resettlement Plan has been prepared for the

subproject having IR impacts. Affected Persons (APs) were identified

through the Encroachment Enumeration Survey (EES) i.e. census survey.

18. It is pertinent to mention here that land acquisition is not within the purview of

HLC-R-1 subproject. Land acquisition is not required as all construction work

mainly completed within 50 meters of the ROW, which is Government land.

Social impacts are confined to private properties, which exist on within the Right

of way (RoW). These impacts are mainly loss of livelihood due to

displacement from the location of business.

19. All the APs have been validated and verified by the CSO (LAVS), appointed for

RP implementation at their respective subprojects. As per updated list of APs

from approved entitlement matrix, CSO appointed for RP implementation

concluded the task such as field verification of APs (issuing notice, signature,

photos & proof of identification like voter ID, bank details, signing of ID card etc.

were taken) and provide assistance in opening of the bank A/C (if

required) before issuing the ID Cards and disbursement. During verification or

thereafter disbursement of livelihood assistance, few APs could not be located

or traced. Even few APs shown their unwillingness to receive their

assistance because they have no proof of document. Efforts are still being

made by the CSO to trace / convince them.

20. A total 124 APs was enumerated during the time of encroachment enumeration

survey (EES) in January 2013. During RP implementation in March 2016,

a total of 108 APs accepted the evacuation notice and signed the ID cards.

Total 16 APs could not be traced and their structures also not found on the

canal embankment. Major APs found in Package - 4 (77 APs), whereas 24 APs

are reported in Package 7 and minor and sub minor canal. A considerable

number of these APs are mainly residential squatters (63.0%) losing their

livelihood, whereas remaining is falling under Commercial category (37.0%).

Particular attention is also being paid to Vulnerable Groups. These APs

reported under vulnerable groups1 are 72.0% of the total APs. Package wise

details are depicted below in Table 1.

1 Vulnerable Group include Below Poverty Lin (BPL), Schedule Caste (SC), Schedule Tribe (ST), Woman Headed

Household (WHH), disabled persons, etc


RS-ISPMC 8

Table 1: Package wise Coverage details of APs

Civil Works (CW) Package No

As per EES, 2013 2016 RP

Implementation Remarks

Res Com Total Res Com Total

Pack-1 5 2 7 5 2 7 No Change

Pack-4 47 33 80 44 33 77 3 Structures not existing during CSO verification

Pack-7 27 10 37 16 8 24 13 Structures not existing during CSO verification

Total 79 45 124 65 43 108

2.2 Impact on Common Property Resources (CPRs)

21. Impact on CPRs is a very critical issue from the point of view of the community.

The community feeling is attached with the common properties especially with

the religious structures. The impact on the number of CPRs reduced because of

protective measures to canal section at the time of implementation. It is also

significant to mention here that some issues related to CPRs has resolved

through community consultation and providing engineering solution by avoiding

impact on common property in the package 5, 12 and Minor and Sub minors.

The status of CPRs remains unchanged during this reporting period. The actual

impacts on CPRs at the time of implementation stage are presented in Table 2.

Table 2: Type of Common Property Resources (CPRs)

CW Package No

No of CPRs

Type of CPR Remarks

4 25 Mangala Thakurani Protected by providing vertical retaining wall

Hanuman Mandir Protected by providing vertical retaining wall

Balunkeswar Nodal UP School

Protected by providing vertical retaining wall

Mangala Mandir Protected by providing vertical retaining wall


GP Office Protected by providing vertical retaining wall

Sandha Thakura Protected by providing vertical retaining wall

Biswa Bharati Club Protected by providing vertical retaining wall

Utkal Gourab Nodal School


Jana KalyanYubak Sangha


Rama Mandir Protected by providing vertical retaining wall




RS-ISPMC 9

Electricity Sub -Station Estimate received from CESU and submitted to PD, PMU for approval; shifting process will initiate soon

Kani UP School Protected by providing vertical retaining wall





UP School Totasahi Protected by providing vertical retaining wall

Mandir Protected by providing vertical retaining wall


Hanuman Statue Protected by providing vertical retaining wall

Mahavir Club Protected by providing vertical retaining wall


7 3 Siba Mandir Protected by providing vertical retaining wall

Mangala Mandir Protected by providing vertical retaining wall

Bhagabat Tungi Protected by providing vertical retaining wall


RS-ISPMC 10

Chapter 3: Compensation & Assistance

22. As of 31 December 2016, all packages under implementation stage have

updated the entitlement matrix. In accordance with the entitlement matrix,

payment was made to APs for structure cost, livelihood assistance, shifting

assistance, assistance for vulnerable APs and additional assistance to

employees wherever applicable. The total budget for RP implementation was

concurred by ADB and approved by DoWR. The EE have disbursed the

compensation and livelihood assistance as per the approved entitlement matrix.

23. As per as the disbursement of compensation to number of APs in the subproject

is concerned, by 31 December 2016 the progress is about 91.3 %. Remaining

8.7% of APs is still to be paid falling under package-1 (4 nos), Minor & sub

minor (5 nos) and package-4 (2 nos). These 11 APs could not submit their

supporting documents for availing the compensation and allowances. The

implementing CSO (LAVS) is pursuing this matter with District Administration

and APs on a regular basis so that payment to APs made immediately. Prior to

commencement of construction activity, all the APs to be compensated in

accordance with the approved entitlement matrix.

24. For further details of AP’s, assistance disbursement date and status refer

Annexure 1. Summary of status of APs whether paid or unpaid, if unpaid with

reasons, are tabulated in as Table 3.


RS-ISPMC 11

Table 3 : Summary of disbursement of Compensation and Other Allowances

Package No

Affected Persons (APs) Affected area (in Sq. mtr.) Compensation & Livelihood

Assistance (Rs.) Reasons for

not paid

Total Received full payment

% Achieved Balance Total Acquired Balance Total Disbursed Balance Payment is in progress

1 2 3 4 5 (2-3) 6 7 8 (6-7) 9 10 11 (9-10) 12

Pack-1 7 3 42.9 4 256 66 190 1,25,010 55,380 69,630 4

Pack-4 77 75 97.4 2 1,434 1,409 25 12,55,619 12,40,664 14,955 2

Pack-7 & Others

24 19 79.2 5 975 875 100 7,87,680 6,82,641 1,05,039 5

Total 108 97 89.8 11 2665 2350 315 21,68,309 19,78,685 1,89,624 11


RS-ISPMC 12

25. As mentioned earlier, in all packages are covered with compensation paid to

APs. In these packages, 108 APs are reported and out of those 97 APs have

been compensated as per the entitlement matrix covering their livelihood

assistance, shifting assistance, vulnerability assistance and additional

assistance to employees at minimum wage level as per the prescribed norm.

Table 4: Disbursements made by Type of Assistance to APs (31 December 2016)

Package No

APs received compensation

Type of Assistance Disbursed to APs (in Rs.) Total

Amount Disbursed

Structure Cost

Livelihood Assistance

Shifting Allowance

One time Addl. Asst. (VHHs)

Assistance for Employees

Pack-1 3 28,380 6,000 6,000 15,000 0 55,380

Pack-4 75 6,85,664 1,50,000 1,50,000 2,55,000 0 12,40,664

Pack-7 19 5,41,641 38,000 38,000 65,000 0 6,82,641

Total 97 12,55,685 1,94,000 1,94,000 3,35,000 - 19,78,685

3.1 Status of Missing APs and Structures not found during the CSO survey

26. Identification of missing and non-existing APs is a major problem; however

efforts are being made by CSO to trace them but it is very difficult to locate

these APs. It is observed that APs who are missing from starting or can’t be

located or have migrated or shifted to some other nearby towns (willingly) well

before the initiation of project implementation as well as mobilization of CSO. In

some packages it was found that few APs deceased so it was decided to make

the payment to their dependents or guardians after submission of supporting

legal documents from the district administration (refer to Table 1).

27. In support of Missing APs and other related issues, concerned SDOs are

advised to collect records of written information from surrounding vendors or

shopkeepers or public representatives. The project will address the issues

of missing APs. Such type of APs will be considered as absentee or no longer

eligible by the time of project closure. Actually missing APs who have wilfully

migrated from the site/town well before initiation of this project

implementation work as their livelihood has not been impacted by the project (in

reality).

3.2 Compensation, relocation or protection of CPRs 28. The project would also lead to impacts on the CPRs like temple, religious

platform, hand pumps, electric transformers, and boundary wall of

religious structures. A total of 28 CPRs would be affected along the project. The

details of the different type of affected CPRs are already provided in Table 2.

Cash compensation at replacement value in consultation with the community

will be provided wherever it is applicable with proper documentation. In

all packages project will give emphasis to protect the existing CPRs either

through providing vertical retaining wall to protect affected CPR.


RS-ISPMC 13

Chapter 4: Consultations and Disclosures

29. A meaningful consultation with APs, local community and civil society for each

package identified as having involuntary resettlement impacts are conducted by

the project. It begins right from initiation for RP implementation in the following

manner:

� begins early in the project preparation stage and is carried out on an on-going basis throughout the project cycle;

� provides timely disclosure of relevant and adequate information that is

understandable and readily accessible to affected person about project

impacts and entitlement matrix;

� undertaken in an atmosphere free of intimidation or coercion;

� customized with the disadvantaged such as social and economic backward

group under vulnerable category (Schedule Caste (SC), Indigenous Peoples /

Schedule Caste (ST), Woman Headed Household (WHH), Physically

Disabled People, Below Poverty Line (BPL); and

� incorporation of all relevant views of affected people and other stakeholders

into decision making, such as project design, mitigation measures, the

sharing of development benefits and opportunities, and implementation

issues.

� Procedure for submission of grievances and contact details of the EEs and

SDOs

30. The EA should pay particular attention to the need of disadvantaged under

vulnerable groups. During RP implementation, the officials from LAVS staffs

from EE organise consultation mainly on social safeguard issues. It is found

during consultations that the participants outlined the necessity of the widening

and strengthening of HLC-R-1 Canal. All participants welcomed the project

and opined to provide all cooperation during civil construction activity. Majority

of participants reported that quality construction and improvement of water flow

to provide better irrigation facility in their locality. The proposed project will in

fact bring lot of benefit to mass people in the district. Since the project is done

mostly in the RoW, which is government land or on the existing alignments, so,

there is no need for additional land for civil works.

31. During July – December 2016, the issues raised in Public Consultation

Meetings were related to R&R Implementation Activities. Opening of Bank A/c,

and Disbursement of Assistance were the prime issues raised, which were

suitably addressed by the concerned SDOs/JEs of the respective irrigation

divisions. It was further communicated that 30 days notice would be provided to

APs before Civil Works initiate (in that section) and disbursement would be

completed prior to the mobilization of the contractor in particular package.

Package wise details of Public Consultation Meetings with APs are depicted in

the Table 5 below and status of award of civil packages mentioned in

Annexure-2.


RS-ISPMC 14

Table 5: Number of Consultations Organized with APs

Sl. No

Name of Village/Place

Package No No of APs

No. of Consultation organized with APs

during-Reporting Period

No. of Consultation

organized with AHs - Dec 2016

No. of Participants

participated - Dec 2016

Issues Discussed with APs

1 Deulchua 1 7 1 1 4 Broadly checked the disbursement figure with entitlement matrix, updated passbook, construction quality and collection of grievances (if any)

2 Itwa/Biswanathpur 4 43 1 2 12 Broadly checked the disbursement figure with entitlement matrix, updated passbook, construction quality and collection of grievances (if any)

3 Kotsahi 7 & Others 18 1 2 28 Broadly checked the disbursement figure with entitlement matrix, updated passbook, construction quality and collection of grievances (if any)


RS, ISPMC

15

Chapter 5: Grievances Redress Mechanism

32. A Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) has been established by the project with the

objective of receiving and facilitating the resolution of complaints & grievances by APs.

The GRM is scaled to the risks and adverse impacts of the project. It should address

APs concerns and complaints promptly, using an understandable and transparent

process that is gender responsive, culturally appropriate, and readily accessible to all

segments of the APs at no cost and without retribution.

33. In this regard the District Level Committee (DLC), is acting as a grievance redress

committee (GRC) under the chairmanship of District Collector with representatives from

the Revenue department, Executive Engineer, HLC-R-1 Canal Division, community-

based organizations (CBOs) and CSO. As a GRC, the DLC meets at regular intervals

based on the availability of the DLC /GRC members and also as per requirement or

pending issues. Grievances not redressed by the GRC will be referred to the PMU for

action. At any stage the AP may take their complaints to a court of law.

34. Concerned SDO along with JEs have been entrusted with the responsibility to maintain a

proper register of the grievance (if any), which will be endorsed by the members involved

in implementation. GRC registers are in place at all sub division level. Further SDOs

have been given instructions to arrange more public consultations and register all the

grievances (including verbal) in writing whether substantial or non substantial and put

them up for the perusal of EE for proper disposal, either at their level or through

GRC/DLC meeting. During this reporting period out of total 41 Grievances were

received, of which 3 grievances are mainly on inclusion of new name in the

entitlement matrix, which was referred to PD, PMU. As suggested by PD, PMU, the

concerned SDO and CSO staffs make a joint field verification and asked all APs to

submit supporting documents on or before January 2013 as proof of evidence for

inclusion of their name in the entitlement matrix. Those APs could not produce any

authenticated documents so finally it was decided not to include their name in the

entitlement matrix and it has been communicated in writing. These grievances are

resolved by the EE as and when received with support from district administration.

Grievances received from 11 APs on demanding revaluation of the loss property. This

issue has been discussed during consultation meeting with APs and will be

compensated through implementation of corrective action plan. Overall out of 41

grievances, 27 grievances resolved and rest are in progress. The status of grievances

are mentioned below in Table-6:


RS, ISPMC

16

Table 6: Package-wise number and type of Grievances

Package-No

Name of Tahasil

Place New Name Inclusion

Demanding revaluation

Total Grievances

1 Tangi Chouwder

Deulichua 4 4

4 Tangi Chouwder

Sainto, Kesharpur, Narpada, Napanga, Birol, Saranga, Bhatimunda, Kani, Paiguan, Jaripada, Karuala, Jasarajpur

1 3 4

7 & Others Tangi Chouwder

Tangi, Kothasahi, Magura,

2 2 4

7 & Others Mahanga Kaitha 0 2 2

Total 3 11 14

Figure 1: Grievance Redress Process

APs

EE/CSO/guided by ISPMC

GRC/DLC

PMU


RS, ISPMC

17

Chapter 6: Institutional Arrangements 35. The Executing Agency (EA) for the Investment Program is PMU under the Water

Resource Department of GoO. To ensure effective implementation of social safeguard

issues, institutional arrangement and capacity is as follows:

� PMU: Staff responsible for look after the safeguard issues of the project includes; One

Executive Engineer as full time Project Officer-Social at PMU is on board and

Assistant Engineer is also sanctioned to assist PO-Social, Project Director administer

the overall activities.

� SIO level: Executive Engineer of each subproject is responsible for overall activities

with well supported by Sub Divisional Officers (SDOs) and Junior Engineers (JEs) as

nodal officers to look after the social safeguard issues and RP preparation/updating

and implementation etc.

� ISPMC: One Resettlement Specialist (part time) from ISPMC has been appointed to

assist the executive engineer-Social at PMU.

� CSO: Main responsibility of implementing the social safeguard requirements and to

assist the SIOs in implementing RPs and community mobilization through various

public meetings, campaign and media means.

36. During the reporting period, safeguard staffs at PMU and SIO are positioned on regular

basis while ISPMC have deployed the Resettlement Specialist on intermittent basis to

provide technical guidance and support.

37. The concerned SIO (EE) internally monitors the implementation of RPs and looks after

other safeguard issues. SIO at subproject have been established to assist in the

coordination and day-to-day implementation and management of the Investment

Program. The Executive Engineer are deployed at the field office and working closely

with the District Collector, Sub Collector, Tahsildar, Local Bodies/Panchayat Level

Committees and CSO to expedite the payments of compensation to APs. To

implement the RP, the EA engaged LAVS, Bhubaneswar based CSO, who was

mobilized in December 2015 for 4 months to assist SIO in the implementation of RPs.

Due to delay in collection of supporting documents from APs the disbursement of

compensation could not completed within the allocated timeframe. The CSO contract

has been extended till end of May 2017.

38. The EE-Social of PMU and Resettlement Specialist of the ISPMC were entrusted with

the responsibility of monitoring the implementation of this RP and assess its

performance and effectiveness, on the basis of review of reports, field observations,

and consultations with APs, other stakeholders and SIO.

39. Internal monitoring is done on regularly while reporting has been on quarterly basis for


RS, ISPMC

18

one year and subsequently has been biannually. The monitoring is conducted at field by

the SIO along with CSO team. They verify APs, distribute ID cards, open bank accounts

and conduct public consultations with APs with respect to project implementation, likely

schedule of initiation of civil works etc. Resettlement Specialist, ISPMC collates all

information of their activities in the form of a report and submits to PMU on a monthly

basis for onward submission.

40. The organizational arrangements for RP preparation and implementation including

monitoring of different social safeguard issues are depicted in Figure 2.

41. Internal Monitoring and Site Visit: The internal monitoring by PMU and SIOs includes: (i)

administrative monitoring to ensure that all compensation as per RP is whether paid or

still unpaid, implementation is on schedule, and problems/grievances are dealt with on a

timely basis; (ii) restoration of public utilities and common property resources impacted

in the project; and (iii) socio-economic monitoring during and after the relocation

process to ensure that people are settled and are better off at the same or different

locations.

Figure 2: Organizational Chart for Managing the Social Safeguard Issues

ADB DoWR

PMU

SIO (EE)

APs

RS, ISPMC


RS, ISPMC

19

Chapter 7: Compliance of Resettlement Framework, 2015 through CAP

42. The Resettlement Plan (RP) has been implemented in all Subprojects and the

compensation paid to APs as per the entitlement matrix, 2008, which was

approved by DoWR. During the Mission visit in May 2016, ADB raised the issue

of partial payment of compensation to APs as per the approved entitlement matrix

and advised to pay the balance amount to the APs by preparing the Corrective Action

Plan (CAP). The suggestion was accepted and revised budget estimate covering all

enumerated APs in the Subprojects has been prepared. The revised estimates for

implementation of CAP mainly cover Transitional allowance; assistance for shed

construction and transport allowance. Other components have already been paid to APs

under approved budget estimate. The Table-7 below clearly mentions the additional

components to be under covered CAP.

43. The Resettlement Plan (RP) has been implemented in all Subprojects and the

compensation paid to APs as per the entitlement matrix, 2008, which was

approved by DoWR. During the Mission visit in May 2016, ADB raised the issue

of partial payment of compensation to APs as per the approved entitlement matrix

and advised to pay the balance amount to the APs by preparing the Corrective Action

Plan (CAP). The suggestion was accepted and revised budget estimate covering all

enumerated APs in the Subprojects has been prepared. The revised estimate for

implementation of CAP mainly covers Transitional allowance; assistance for shed

construction and transport allowance. Other components have already been paid to

APs under approved budget estimate. The Table-7 below clearly mentions the additional

components to be under covered CAP.

Table 7: Component wise Approved and Revised Estimate

Sl. No

Type of Compensation and Assistance Approved Estimate-Already Paid to APs

Revised Estimate -To be Paid to APs under CAP

1 Structure Cost As per BSR NIL

2 Livelihood Assistance Rs. 2000/Per AP NIL

3 Shifting Allowance Rs. 2000/Per AP NIL

4 Assistance to Employees Rs. 18000/Per AP NIL

5 Assistance to Vulnerable Household Rs. 5000/Per AP NIL

6 Transitional Allowance NIL Rs. 24000/Per AP

7 Assistance for Temporary Shed construction NIL Rs. 10000/Per AP

8 Transport Allowance NIL Rs. 2000/Per AP

44. The approved budget for HLC Range 1 subproject was Rs. 32,93,861/-and as per RF

2015, the estimated budget for implementation of CAP comes to Rs. 81,42,260/-

covering all enumerated APs (124 nos) The revised estimate has been submitted to the

Government for necessary approval. On receipts of the Government’s approval, the

payment to AP’s as per Corrective Action Plan will be made.


RS, ISPMC

20

Chapter 8: Conclusion and Recommendations

45. During the reporting period, each SIO (EE) and other stakeholders have implemented

the social safeguards requirement for information dissemination adequately, helping

APs and local communities to understand the project clearly. The types of assistance

paid to APs and the amounts disbursed complied with the requirements of the RPs.

Grievances of the APs and local people have been resolved timely and adequately. The

APs expressed their satisfaction with their compensation. Each SIO has assigned

either an Assistant Engineer (SDO) or Junior Engineer as a Nodal Officer to take care of

the Social Safeguards. One EE has been assigned as fulltime staff at PMU for all

subprojects for RP implementation.

46. Disbursement of additional compensation to APs under Implementation of Corrective

Action Plan (CAP) needs to be completed earliest for completion of construction activity

within the timeframe.

47. Assessment of social safeguards planned by the project and recommendations has

been an important initiative to improve performance, illustrated below in Table 8.

Table 8: Assessment of social safeguards issues and recommendation

No Description Problem Recommendation

1 Assistance / Compensation to APs

Assistance/compensation to APs are not disbursed before the commencement of civil works in few packages (due to name mismatch and deceased APs)

Regular follow up by EE with sub collector or Tahsildar and ensured that APs should get their legal documents to receive compensation. PMU made practical efforts to ensure full disbursement of compensation to the remaining APs and these efforts must continue. The progress made should be monitored internally and externally until all APs are fully paid/ compensated.

2

Affected Persons (APs) reported ‘Missing’ or ‘structure not existing’

Generally APs are squatter /mobile vendors and may lose their livelihood temporarily due to project activities. It was noted that in subprojects 101 APs could not be compensated due to their absence to receive compensation.

APs found Missing or structure not existing from their location during CSO verification. The attempt was made to send messages through their friends and relatives or close by APs for collection of compensation. In future if any missing AP submitted supporting document he/she will receive compensation as per the approved entitlement matrix.


RS, ISPMC

21

Annexure 1: Summary Status of Disbursement paid to APs - 31 December 2016

Sl. No

Photo No

Main/Dist

Civil Package No

Affected

Category

Name of Beneficiary

Caste Annual Income

Area Affected (Sq. Mtr.)

Compensation Paid

Compensation and Allowance to be paid (Rs.) as per CAP

Total payment received

(Rs.)

Present Status of payment

Transitional

Allowance

Temporary shed allowanc

e

Transport

Allowance

Addl. Asst to VHH (if

not paid)

Total Payment

under CAP

Final Payment to be Paid to

APs (Phase-I + Phase-II)

1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 (19 to

22) 24 (17+23)

+16

1 1 MC 1 Com Trilochan Rout Gen < 25000 24 19,320 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

2 2 MC 1 Resi Sujit Rout Gen < 25000 22 18,460 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

3 3 MC 1 Com Ratnakar Swain Gen < 25000 20 17,600 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

4 4 MC 1 Resi Kailash Sumurai SC < 25000 30 0 Not Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 50,310

5 5 MC 1 Resi Gopi Digi OBC < 25000 60 0 Not Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 55,620

6 6 MC 1 Resi Narendra Bandra SC < 25000 40 0 Not Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 52,080

7 7 MC 1 Resi Tania Purty SC < 25000 60 0 Not Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 55,620

Package-1 256 55,380 1,68,000 70,000 14,000 -

2,52,000 3,21,630

8 10 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Fagu Samal OBC < 25000 30 14,310 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

9 11 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Sadhab Samal Gen < 25000 40 16,080 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

10 12 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Madhab Samal OBC < 25000 36 15,372 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

11 13 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Udhab Samal OBC < 25000 30 14,310 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

12 14 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Manoj Samal OBC < 25000 15 11,655 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

13 23 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Seikh Hider

Muslim < 25000 10 10,770 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

14 29 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Biswaranjan Hati Gen < 25000 40 16,080 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

15 32 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Kabi Bhoi OBC < 25000 14 11,478 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

16 33 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Gouranga Bhoi OBC < 25000 15 11,655 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

17 39 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Dusasan Nayak OBC < 25000 15 11,655

Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000


RS, ISPMC

22

18 47 Disty.No-1 4 Resi

Sujit Kumar Mohanty Gen

85001-1 lakh 25 8,425 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000


Sachidanada Mohanty Gen < 25000 30 14,310 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

20 53 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Kailash Das Gen < 25000 12 6,124 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 5,000 41,000 41,000

21 54 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Bansidhar Das Gen < 25000 10 10,770 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

22 55 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Nabin Das Gen < 25000 15 11,655 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

23 62 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Kishori Nayak Gen < 25000 12 11,124 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

24 63 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Akshya Maharana Gen < 25000 12 11,124 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000


Dambarudhar Sahoo OBC

25001-45000 12 6,124 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

26 74 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Baikuntha Mallick SC

25001-45000 30 9,310 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 5,000 41,000 41,000


Paramananda Behera SC < 25000 12 11,124 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

28 86 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Adikanda Mallick SC

25001-45000 15 - Not Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 5,000 41,000 47,655

29 90 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Kailash Behera SC < 25000 20 12,540 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

30 92 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Dharani Das Gen < 25000 20 12,540 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

31 27 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Abdul Malik Khan Gen

85001-1 lakh 30 16,900 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000


Ramesh Maharana Gen

85001-1 lakh 15 10,450 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

33 65 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Jatadhari Sahoo OBC

25001-45000 12 9,160 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

34 67 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Narada Sahoo OBC < 25000 10 13,300 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

35 68 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Trailokya Sahoo OBC < 25000 20 17,600 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

36 70 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Birabara Sahoo OBC < 25000 20 17,600 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

37 72 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Babaji Sahoo OBC

25001-45000 15 10,450 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000


Harekrushna Sahoo OBC < 25000 15 15,450 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

39 105 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Kedar Nath Singh Gen

45001-65000 10 0 Not Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 44,300

40 22 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Jagannath Biswal Gen

45001-65000 25 14,750 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

41 25 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Gora Khan Gen

45001-65000 30 16,900 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

42 26 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Abdul Barik Khan Gen

85001-1 lakh 30 16,900 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000


RS, ISPMC

23

43 30 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Maina Bhoi OBC < 25000 12 14,160 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000


Deepak Kumar Mohanty Gen

85001-1 lakh 40 21,200 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000


Manoj Kumar Sahoo Gen < 25000 30 21,900 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

46 51 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Alekh Behera SC < 25000 40 26,200 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

47 58 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Rasananda Sahoo OBC

25001-45000 10 8,300 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

48 52 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Muralidhar Das Gen

25001-45000 10 24,000 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000


Gangadhar Maharana OBC < 25000 18 45,000 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

50 71 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Dhirendra Sahoo OBC < 25000 15 39,000 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

51 75 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Jayanta Panda Gen

65001-85000 50

1,04,000 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

52 57 Disty.No-1 4 Com

Rabindranath Sahoo OBC < 25000 10 10,770 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

53 79 Disty.No-1 4 Com Kunja Panda Gen < 25000 18 12,186 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

54 80 Disty.No-1 4 Com Mitika Kar Gen < 25000 12 11,124 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

55 88 Disty.No-1 4 Com Jatindra Kar Gen < 25000 10 10,770 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

56 94 Disty.No-1 4 Com Parsuram Jena OBC < 25000 12 6,124 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

57 100 Disty.No-1 4 Com Sumanta Sahoo Gen

65001-85000 40 11,080 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

58 110 Disty.No-1 4 Com Dibakar Sahoo SC < 25000 15 11,655 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

59 15 Disty.No-1 4 Com Chintamani Nayak OBC

25001-45000 15 10,450 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000


Krushna Chandra Sahoo Gen < 25000 25 19,750 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

61 19 Disty.No-1 4 Com Rankanidhi Barik OBC < 25000 15 15,450 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000


Biranchi Narayan Barik OBC

25001-45000 20 12,600 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

63 24 Disty.No-1 4 Com Golap Khan Gen < 25000 20 17,600 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

64 35 Disty.No-1 4 Com Maheswar Behera SC < 25000 35 24,050 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

65 36 Disty.No-1 4 Com Ranjan Satpathy Gen < 25000 20 17,600 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

66 59 Disty.No-1 4 Com Karunakar Das Gen

25001-45000 10 8,300 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

67 60 Disty.No-1 4 Com Ananta Ku Parida Gen

25001-45000 12 9,160 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000


RS, ISPMC

24

68 61 Disty.No-1 4 Com Sovit Prusty Gen

25001-45000 18 11,740 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000


Akashya Maharana Gen < 25000 10 13,300 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

70 96 Disty.No-1 4 Com Abani Sethy SC < 25000 12 14,160 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

71 107 Disty.No-1 4 Com Parsuram Sahoo OBC

25001-45000 22 13,460 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

72 16 Disty.No-1 4 Com Bishnu Sahoo Gen < 25000 12 14,160 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

73 37 Disty.No-1 4 Com Sanatan Pradhan OBC < 25000 10 13,300 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000


Manas Ranjan Swain Gen < 25000 6 11,580 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000


Kailash Chandra Behera SC

45001-65000 10 8,300 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 5,000 41,000 41,000

76 97 Disty.No-1 4 Com Keshab Nayak OBC < 25000 10 13,300 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

77 102 Disty.No-1 4 Com Gouranga Khuntia Gen < 25000 6 11,580 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

78 103 Disty.No-1 4 Com Ranjan Behera SC < 25000 6 11,580 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000


Dambarudhar Behera SC < 25000 6 11,580 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

80 106 Disty.No-1 4 Com Bhagabati Sethy SC < 25000 10 13,300 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

81 109 Disty.No-1 4 Com Purusottam Sahoo OBC < 25000 15 15,450 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

82 111 Disty.No-1 4 Com Biswanath Nayak SC < 25000 15 15,450 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

83 20 Disty.No-1 4 Com Khetramani Barik OBC < 25000 25 59,000 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

84 41 Disty.No-1 4 Com Lokanath Biswal Gen < 25000 25 59,000 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

Package-4 1434

12,40,664 18,48,000 7,70,000 1,54,000 20,000

27,92,000 28,06,955

85 114

Disty.No-1.B

7 & Others Resi Pabitra Kar Gen < 25000 10 10,770 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

86 119

Disty.No-1.C

7 & Others Resi Dhruba Singh OBC < 25000 15 0 Not Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 51,450

87 115

Disty.No-1.C

7 & Others Resi Prahallad Singh OBC < 25000 20 0 Not Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 85,000

88 128 Disty.No-4

7 & Others Resi Lali Bibi Gen

25001-45000 25 0 Not Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 44,425

89 129 Disty.No-4

7 & Others Resi Seikh Kalu Alli Gen < 25000 12 0 Not Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 47,124

90 142 Disty. 7 & Resi Gania Pradhan OBC 25001- 15 6,655 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000


RS, ISPMC

25

No-4 A

Others 45000

91 143

Disty.No-4 A

7 & Others Resi

Umakanta Pradhan OBC < 25000 18 12,186 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

92 144

Disty.No-4 A

7 & Others Resi Ramesh Pradhan OBC < 25000 15 11,655 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

93 145

Disty.No-4 A

7 & Others Resi Fakir Pradhan OBC < 25000 18 12,186 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

94 146

Disty.No-4 A

7 & Others Resi Tuna Pradhan OBC < 25000 18 12,186 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

95 147

Disty.No-4 A

7 & Others Resi Srikanta Pradhan OBC

25001-45000 15 6,655 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

96 148

Disty.No-4 A

7 & Others Resi Bhara Pradhan OBC < 25000 16 11,832 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

97 149

Disty.No-4 A

7 & Others Resi Naria Pradhan OBC < 25000 18 12,186 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

98 151

Disty.No-4 A

7 & Others Resi

Dillip Kumar Berma Gen < 25000 10 13,300 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

99 141

Disty.No-4 A

7 & Others Resi Srikanta Sendha Gen < 25000 40 26,200 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

100 150

Disty.No-4 A

7 & Others Resi Ganeswar Gill Gen

65001-85000 50

1,04,000 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

101 113

Disty.No-1.B

7 & Others Com Narayan Panda Gen < 25000 10 10,770 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

102 117

Disty.No-1.C

7 & Others Com Dhobina Sahoo OBC < 25000 28 0 Not Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 57,040

103 118

Disty.No-1.C

7 & Others Com Dusasan Sathua Gen < 25000 12 14,160 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

104 120

Disty.No-1.C

7 & Others Com Biranchi Nath Gen < 25000 40 89,000 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

105 121

Disty.No-1.C

7 & Others Com Bidyadhar Sahoo Gen < 25000 40 89,000 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

106 123

Disty.No-2

7 & Others Com Narendra Routray Gen

85001-1 lakh 180 81,400 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

10 124 Disty. 7 & Com Narendra Routray Gen 85001-1 170 77,100 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000


RS, ISPMC

26

7 No-2 Others lakh

108 125

Disty.No-2

7 & Others Com Narendra Routray Gen

85001-1 lakh 180 81,400 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000

Package-7 & Others 975

6,82,641 5,76,000

2,40,000 48,000 -

8,64,000 9,69,039

Total Packages 2,665

19,78,685 25,92,000

10,80,000 2,16,000 20,000

39,08,000 40,97,624


RS, ISPMC

27

Annexure 2: Status of Civil Works Contract in HLC-R-1 Canal Division (0-10 km)

Package No Status of Compensation Status of Contract

Pack-1 100 % compensation paid Contract Awarded

Pack-4 100 % compensation paid Contract Awarded

Pack-7 & Others 100 % compensation paid Contract Awarded

Orissa Integrated Irrigated Agriculture and Water ... · i Department of Water Resources (DoWR)...

Documents

Transcript of Orissa Integrated Irrigated Agriculture and Water ... · i Department of Water Resources (DoWR)...