Original Petition Affidavit
-
Upload
marc-boyer -
Category
Documents
-
view
230 -
download
0
Transcript of Original Petition Affidavit
-
8/19/2019 Original Petition Affidavit
1/13
Sco
rr
th;
jAil
t
i]
:$it
Jan 15,2016
Between:
And:
preine
Couft
of
British
THE LAW SOCIETY OF
BRITISH COLUMBIA
Marc Pierre
Boyer
RESPONSE TO PETITION
RE: File
No:
S-
15107
Vancouver
Registry
Columbia
Petitioner
Respondent
83
Filed
by :
Marc Pierre
Boyer
acting under our districts'fiduciary trust
as
CFA
for several Marijuana Party
Electoral
District
Associations
[EDA]
4-858 East 66 Ave. Vancouver
BC,
VST 1 M1
[EDA
headquarters]
THIS lS
A
RESPONSE TO
the
petition
filed
BY:
The
Law
Society
of British
Columbia
845
Gambie
Street,
Vancouver,
BC,
VGB
429
Petitioner'sLawyer
MichealKleisinger
The Law
Society of
British Columbia
845
Cambie
Street,
Vancouver
BC, V6B 4Zg
JAN
18
Z01E
yi
LAW
SOCIETY OF B.C,
Part
1:
ORDERS
CCTISENTED TO:
As expressed
in
the attached
PROTEST
Synopsis
of
Part 1: Marc Boyer asked for
and would
like to consent to
proceed
with
responding
to
points
1 thru
4 of
this Petition
/case. But,
lwon't
consent to be mistaken
by
this
pedantic trap to consent
to
being an all capitals
ENTITY
A basic understanding
can be established
at
this
First
Appearance,
in
order
to
proceed properly,
by
this court
addressing
the following courses, NAMELY:
1)
Declared
that
all assumptions
of
holding
special recognition
are dismissed, or
(2)
Rule
that my bond has
a
face value
that
needs
to
be established
[for
example] under the
PPSA;
[8y
pro
ceeding under
another
Act?l
Part
2:
ORDERS
OPPOSED:
We oppose the
granting
of any order that the BAR desires to
implement
in
points
1
thru 4 of
this
Petition.
As
we see
it,
we have been extended
21
days
[as
you
catl
it]
from the
date served to submit a challenge to
points
1 thru 4,
and
we
will
be
filing
a
detailed
response Petition,
in
order to
proceed
with
addressing our
general position
of:
there
is
no
authority
in
any
other
Act to subvert the
Supremacy
of the Canada Elections Act.
Part
3: ORDERS
ON
WHICH NO POSITION lS
TAKEN:
The
facts contained
in
the
Aflidavits
are
good
enough tc file
a
factual basis, a legal
basis, and
materials to be relied
on
to contest
our claim
that
no
Act can subvert
the
Act.
As we
see it, no
paper
queen
can
commit
sedition
by
assuming
that
the
BAR must defend this trust
violation,
because there's this
omission
of
an
allegiance
to
preclude you
from obeying orders that
destroy
Canada and the Commonwealth,
in
order
to conform to this
paper queen's
desire to
ignore
an oath taken
on a
plastic
Stone.
l. AS
we see it:
we
are
not contesting the estimated 2-hour timeline
to
settle
this
132-
page
Petition. BECAUSE
we
agree
that our
PROTEST
can be
ruled
on,
in
this time-
frame;
in this
way,
proceed
to
a
date set to appear on this
protest,
contained in
Part
1.
-
8/19/2019 Original Petition Affidavit
2/13
Jan
15, 2016
RE: Fiie
ilio:
S-
15107
Vancouver
Registry
ln the Supreme
Coutt of British
Columbia
Tl{E
LAW
SOCIETY
OF
BRITISH
COLUMBIA
Petitionen
Marc Pierre
Boyer
Respondent
RESPONSE TO PETITION
Between:
And:
Part
1:
DENIAL
OF CONSENT
TO
grant
orders
set out
in
this
following
PROTEST
in order
to revolve
an
Essential
Element of
Law at
this
first Appearance
UNDER
PROTEST:
This application
was
initiated with
a
letter
from
Mr Kleisinger addressing
a common
law complaint
against
Marc
Boyer dated
July
30, 2015,
[p-3
-Ms
Souvage
Affidavit]
AND
this PETITION
-
S-15197
83
is
filing an
action
against
MARC PIERRE
BOYER, when
the
BAR
is barred from
giving
me
this
straw
man,
because
this lnstitution
knows that creating
this legal
entity
is
directly forbidden
in
Law,
because it's
a
violation
of Sec
336
CC
-
FRAUD
Appendix
A
offers
a
detailed
account of
these abnormalities
of
my abnormal birth
l.
By
definition: the main reason
Marc Boyer
holds
a
criminal record
is
due
to
this
original
violation
of
creating
this
all
capitals
entity.
Frankly,
the
primary
function
for Sec 336
CC
and Sec
337 CC existing
is
because
your
Sumerian
lore warns of
dire consequences,
for violating this trust that
will
lead
to answering the
question
contained
in lCor
4:20
NAMELY:
Does
Authority again
desire on
engaging
the merciless end
of
this civilization
/age
flike
Nineveh
did],
when
challenged by the one with
the abnormal
birth
[of
l
Corl5]
2.
With this Petition, we come
full circle as to why
this
[attached]
gag
order was created
in
the first
place
NAMELY:
This trust was violated
by
Attorney
General
Wally Oppal, in
2004
12005,
who
under Sec
8
CC
Territories Act terminology:
raped me
a of my
private
individual
landed
rights.
Due
to my abnormal birth right, authority
is
directly
forbidden
to create
flet
alone
imprison]
this all capitals entity. THEREFORE,
since the BAR
initiated this action means
i
can now civilly
protest
this act
in
this
proceeding,
in order
to recognize my claim to
the
face
value of my bond, so that
good
first-fruit can occur.
3. This decade
old
gag
order barred
me from
pressing
the inevitability
of
having
to
settle
this case
civilly,
which
resulted
in
your
criminal Code acting like
i
must be assimilated
or destroyed,
on
a
pedantic
assumption that
without
a lawyer
i
did
not know any
better.
This Civil
proceeding
must
address this systemic abuse of my common
law
guarantees
4.
As
we see
4
that's why
this
Petition implies
a
few
times that
just
because
being found
guilty
under
the criminal
Court
jurisdiction,
does
not
necessarily
mean
that
i can
be
assumed to
be
found
guilty
in
this
Civil
proceeding
where ijust
might
get'a
yes'.
ON THIS: I'm certain that
i
have friends in High
places
of authority
that
actually
act
as
if on my side;
othemise
appearances
like
this civil solution would
never have been
pressed.
Therefore,
iihank
all
ihose
yrho
are making
this cjvi court date
possible.
83
-
8/19/2019 Original Petition Affidavit
3/13
APPENDIX
A:
On
outiining
the impoitance of thls Birth
Staternent /bond iss*e
ON
OUTLINING
SPECIFIC AtsR{ORMALIT ES N MY
ABilIORMAL
E'RTH
STATEMENT,
PREF,ACE:
in
the
attached copy,
i
printed
a back to back copy,
just
like my original etched
short
form,
which
is
part
of a long form regisiry that is
aciually
like how i laid-up
the 2nd
way.
This
original
document
is on acetate film,
the
hand
writing
is
my mother's, done
with
a special
pen,
where
after this document is registered,
is
then
dipped
in
acid, and the
writing
is actually
transparent,
in order
that
no one
can alter or forge
this
document.
ln
99.999% of
the
time,
the
whole
document
is dipped at
the
same
time,
and
a
Red
Seal
is/was
added,
and in this
way
this
baby
became
this
bond
issue
[a
Warehouse
Receipt],
which
gave
the
government
[at
that
time] a million
dollars, in return for
the
bondholder
[UCC
/the
Pope]
to be
entitled to
the
entire earnings
/output
created
by
this
indentured
slave status, for
the
rest of
their
life.
lN MY
CASE,
because my father signed this
commission
resulted where
[in
Jan 1952]
only
the
right
side was dipped
in
acid.
Then, the King died
a
few
weeks
later. AND this
document
was
in
estopple
for
38
years.
The
left side
was cast
in
Jan
1sth,
1
989.
This dipping
was
done
so
that
it's impossible to
forge
or
alter
this
title
document later
1.
On
the filigree
of this Statement /bond:
This
is a
very
ancient way
to
designate
[in
this casel
the
bounty
/wealth
of
the
Commonwealth
that
was
in trust
with
King
George
Vl
[for
his loyal
subjects]
that
were
symbolically
upheld by
the
Stone
of Destiny,
which
is heavily
attached to Sumerian, Christian,
Jewish
and
Celtic
lore. This
Sumerian
twisted
logic
is the foundation
for
Rom
3:
'what
if
we do evil,
so
that
good
can result?'
2.
This
filigree
was
replaced
with
boxes
in
Queen
Elizabeth's reign, because
the
King's
coffers
were
robbed by
this
war
debt,
by being responsible for
the
damages
incurred
by the winning
and losing sides of the war.
Upon his
death,
resulted where
the
Pope
/UCC thru at-large bankers robbed
the
Commonwealth's
trust,
by
fully
implementing
this truly evil
ancient Sumerian
slavery
racket
called:
WAREHOUSE
RECEIPTS.
3.
Because of
my father's commission, my Statement has all kinds of odd markings to
it.
LIKE
: The
solid line that
was
drawn-in
[at
the
top
of
the
right
side,
on
the
front
face].
When
it
was
cast,
it
designated
that this
statement or bond is on
solid
ground.
The
line under
BOYER is also underlined,
meaning
my
father's trust
is on
solid
ground.
4. On this title
document,
my UCC file
# is: 11327O,
and
[on
the
backside] this Ontario
Registry
#
88-361731
was
added
in
1
988,
and
it's
purposely
placed
above
the
Crest.
ION
THIS]
Had
i
said
'yes'to
this
question
of:
'do
you
want a
Birth Certificate', this #
would've
been
directly
under Despina
Georgas'thumb,
just
like my Birth
# 000665
is
directly under the registrais signature. Had ifallen for this same trap of saying
'yes',
[in
Dec.
1988] my bond
would
have been
seized to
pay
the
war
ciebi, because
my
#
88-361731
would
have
been directly
under
this
registrar's
signature. But,
it's
not.
5. Now,
because my
father
had this
trust,
is
why
this
#
is
above the
Queen,
and
this
automatically
created 2
quirks:
(1)
i
did not
get
any Seal,
(2)
this
Special Notice
saying
that this
statement
is not a registration,
[therefore]
it
is a herediiary entitlement.
1.
Now, when
you
look
at
the
BOND lay-up,
This
# 88-361731
is above
this
UCC
#,
r,vhere
the ancient
teim
of:
'being
c. the
-:,oae"
i-.
c'??.
;
b:'"'rc exo.ess:d
h:':
-
8/19/2019 Original Petition Affidavit
4/13
2. Had i
been
under
Despina's
thumb, this #
would
have been
taken
as a death
certificate
being
issued, by
this
# being
in the
medical
practices
box. But,
it's
not.
1.
This
is
why
it's
a
crime
of
FRAUD to
press
on
me, an all capitals
legal entity.
3. What cannot be mis'taken'
[here]
is
that
this
#
000665 is now
in
the
Seal section,
which
clearly entitles me
to
1-share of the
value
of my King's
Commonwealth
bond.
4.
NOW COMES
THE
BIG
QUIRK:
[because
i
said 'no', resulted with] The
#
37300
being added twice
[in
1989],
and
this
is a
California Law
called:
litle to
property
while
on water.
I did
not
land in
Ontario,
i'm somehow
now landed in
California,
and
my
[inheritance]
is now
this title bond
to
1-share of the
Commonwealth's wealth.
5.
The
adding
of
this
#
37300
marking,
means
everyone who
trampled
on me for the
last
decade
is
guilty
of breaking
this
really ancient
trust.
AND,
10-years later,
i
get
invited to Civilly open this file, where the charge
of FMUD must
be dealt with.
1
.
Today, it's called FRAUD, for
depriving
me
of this title
to
be fairly
treated
under
common law.
-
Sec
340 CC
FRAUD.
Destroying
documents of
titte.
Every
one
who, for
a fraudulent
purpose,
destroys, cancels, conceals
or obliterates
(a)
a
document
of
title to goods or lands, (b)
a
valuable security
or
testamentary
instrument,
or
(c)
a
judicial
or oificial document, is
guilty
of an
indictable offence
and liable to
imprisonment for
a term
not exceeding
ten
years.
[under
absolute
trust
liability
=
guilty]
6.
ON
THIS:
When the
Queen's
registry, defaced
my
Statement
with
this
#37300, in
1989
is
not
fraud;
these abnormalities are
actually
prescribed
by UCC law, and
exceptionally
rare.
1.
lN HINDSIGHT:
This FRAUD originally occurred, when
Wally Oppal
committed the
crime of
the
millennium, by
authorizing
the
BAR
to
commit FRAUD,
in order
to
entrap
me to
get
a PERSON, and that way
this
now 83 file
thick dossier that
was
created, in
2004
l2OO5
could
just
be closed, because somehow
my bond
had been
cashed
in.
2. ln
twisted
UCC logic, it's
as
if
i
did this
ten
year
sentence. Frankly,
most of
the
abuse
that
occurred
in
the
last
decade, had
to
occur,
BUT under respondeat
Superior
some
one must be made accountable
for
this
abuse.
AND
this can be
done,
by
recognizing
that
their
is
a real value to this BOND, at this
first
appearance,
and
proceed
accordingly.
7.
AS WE
SEE lT: This fiduciary
trust
violation
falls
on who
ever
holds
the
Office
of
this
paper
Queen
of
Canada;
[since
the
Charter]
the
trust
is now on Marc
Mayrand,
and
he is also holding
the Canadian
BAR's
trust
account. AND
if i'm
wrong
ihen,
the
Crown is duty bound
to
press
[who
ever
holds this trust]
to
appear at
the first
appearance, or at
least
make
themselves
be known who
they
are
For
the
record]
lN
CONCLUSION:
What should
be noted is THAT: the abnormalities
on my
statement
are
[by intent]
extremely
rare, because there's
this
big red seal
that
hides
this
UCC
bond
number.
AND,
because She violated this
ancient trust means:
We
are entitled to
seize
Her certificates.
1. Frankly, there
were
so few
such bonds issued
in
the
first
place,
and there
were
so
many traps to
get
thru
-
THIS
MEANS
THAT: 64
years
after
this
bond
issue
was
closed
that
we
can
claim
to
hold
the
only real bearer
share
left, and
this means that:
the
UCC,
or
the
Crown, or
the
BAR
are now
placed
with
the
onus
to
prove
otherwise. AND
1.
Frankly,
the one
responsible
for
holding
this
information
is Marc Mayrand,
and his
clerk
lves
Cote, who
happen to be attached to
this
Petition from
the
BAR.
2. Mr. Buhler is representing
their
interests in this court,
and
under Sec 337 CC, they
must deliver
this
information
/statistic,
at
this 1"'
appearance. Act accordingly.
-
8/19/2019 Original Petition Affidavit
5/13
BACK
TO
THE
IMPORTANCE
OF
LIFTING
THIS DECADE OLO GAG
ORDER
7.
This
gag
order
came from me
filing a
motion
in response
to
getting
the minutes
of
the
meeting
where
the
BC BAR converted their oath
of allegiance to this new
Barristers and Solicitors
oath
of
1993. This
gag
order enforces that
Marc
Boyer
cannot
use
this secret
in
order to
submit any
court document
without
a
lawyer filing
this motion,
in
order
words the BAR
is
compelled
to bar
anyone who
will
make
a
common law defence using especially
a'Free
and democratic society'
[R
v
Oakes]
in
any
proceeding,
because
at
face value, lawyers
are directly
prohibited
to
do so,
therefore
no
one else can defend common
law
in
any
proceeding,
under Sec
126(2) CC
8.
As
we
understand
this
conflict
in law,
the
Federal
Courts thru the
BAR are
pressing
that:
in
order to
comply
with
an implied
necessary
requirement of
having
NAFTA
passed,
means
we
Canadians
have been
governed
under the
North
American Free
Trade
Agreement Agreement,
[NAFTA
agreement]
where
lawyers
are agreeing
to serve the Federal Courts
as Supreme
9.
In
the minutes
of this
meeting
it
stated
that
with
just
a show of
hands,
the
vote
passed.
BUT,
it was duly
noted
in
the minutes
by
some
benchers that this
new oath would inevitably
lead
to
a
serious conflict between this
new oath
of
the
Bar and the oath of the
Office
[of
these
benchersl,
because
of
the
inevitable conflicts
that could occur from
serving two masters.
10.
This conflict
between the oath
to
the
BAR and the oath of Office
of
the
benchers has come to
full festering
fruition, under this
SCC unanimous
Smith
ruling, because
this
conflict
in
law
has
created
this elephant to enter
the
room and
nobody
in
authority
wants to
address
this conflict
in law
-
NAMELY:
According to the
SCC
-
it's
actually
legal to
grow
cannabis
for
dispensaries
that service
the
needs
of the vulnerable
in
society,
'I
l.
Frankly until
this conflict in law
is
settled
civilly can only
lead
to this fact
that
when
/if
a unanimous
decision
like
this
SCC
ruling
can be ignored
by everyone
in
Maritime
Authority,
means
all
Canadians
right to
Sovereignty
have been
trashed
by
lawyers
and
police
and
uncivil servants
by
this
oath to obey the
Federal
Court
as
Supreme
-
except
these
BAR
members
called benchers,
who are bound
to
obey
the SCC
as Supreme.
12. In
our
case. the
independence
of these
benchers is being
hollowed out
by
having the
Crown
be
able
to
block any of our
common
law
application
of
law
from being
filed,
because
of this
gag
order, which
is now being compounded
with this Court
Motion.
13.
BoTTOM
LINE:
There is
one
big difference
between
when this systematic
plan
to
gradually
become
part
of
their
New
World order was
set, and today
NAMELY:
Those
who
govern
are now
held
to
having to
explain
why they're
doing this.
14.
In
true
Biblical
proportions:
as to the
2"d
Commandment
-
The sins
of the
father
are
being
held by the
son,
and
this court
ruling
is
literally
deciding
whether
the
BAR
and
those who
govern
want to
go
to a
Wedding by recognizing
that:
the
Supremacy
of
common
law
is
in fact
the founding principles
of
God's
law
being
Suprenre, and
a
Banquet
was offered
to
everyone
else
and
frankly
i
take comfort
in observing
that the
Bible
did not lie,
because
exactly
as
to
prophecy
no
one
is lifting
finger
to help.
15.
EITHER
WAY: Exactly
as
to R v
Oakes
-
This
decision
is
the culmination
of
a
truly
demonic
sinister
plan
despite
its
effect
to
be
reasonable
and demonstrably
iustified
[or]
the
Genesis
for
returning
the
rights
and freedoms
guaranteed
in the Chartei
l.
THEREFORE:
we wait in
patient
anticipation
for
the inevitable
and
irrevocable
consequences
that
will
arise
from
'a
yes'or
no
decision
on
this charge
by the BAR.
51
-
8/19/2019 Original Petition Affidavit
6/13
.i
.i.
-i
t.-f
i
Novdnih'er-27,'2ofs
1.,.;.-
.*13
,
Qac-k,
in
0O{;'Marc
Boyer
was
served a
gag
order
by
the head registrar
of
the Civil Registry
-.
''
-'
.
called
Mr. Messenger
This
gag
order came
from
filing one document
that he
called
t,exatious,
-
".-
dnd
oiibihallt'
his
gag
order
only
applied to
the
civil registry
and it now applies
to
the criminal
registry
as
well, because i
keep
bringing
up
the thomy
issue
that this
court
now faces again.
Except now
it's far
worse
than
when
i
started, and
it
can never get better without someone like
me
going
the distance
in spite
of the huge
obstacles,
because if i don't, then
who will?
2.
ln this new case, the BAR
now
wants to
stop
me
frcm
acting like a lawyer
in a
criminal
matte(
when l'm acting
like a barrister,
who is defending the issue of
no
jurisdiction
at
the arraignment.
ION
THIS]: Criminal
charges
are not
a
criminal matter
until
after the
arraignment.
'1.
At
face
value:
With
this common law motion filed
by the BAR, we
have done
a full
circle;
by
this
i mean, we're
back
to the
original reason
for this decade old
gag
order,
except
worse;
where the
BAR
wants exclusivity to represent
anyone in any
phase
of
a
court
proceeding,
in order
to
bar
anyone
like
me
from
making a common
law
defence because
i
know
and
act on benefiting
from
the
Achilles
heal
that the minutes
of
this vote exposed.
3.
The
larger issue
at
stake in
this
case
is
that
after
22
yea|s of every one associated
with
the
BAR
[ike]
law enforcemenl
officers
are
prohibited
from
being
a common
law
Peace Officer and
every
lawyer has been
prohibited
from
defending any
common
law application
in a
criminal
matter, which
has resulted where
all Canadian common law
rights and Freedoms
have been
systematically
gutted
by lawyers
[in
1993]
and enforced
under under
Civilian Oversight
[1998]
4.
[at
face
value]
lN
THIS CASE,
of relying on the mountain
of statutory limitation
placed
on our
Free
and Democratic society
[under
R
v Oakes] means
the fact remains
that when no one can
defend
common
laq results
where
the
BAR is entrenched
on destroying democratic
freedom
by
insisting that
theiiAct
supersedes
the Act,
which
plays
hand in hand with
NATO
passing
/
implementing
this
sedition
Act called
S-55
of the CDSA,
which
lby
virtue
of
the
fact
that
it came
from
Royal ascentl,
results
where all BAR member can
actually
engage
in
vanquishing
all its
disadvantaged
Canadians
by
causing
the
total decimation
of all
human rights
known
to man,
because
a
faceless paper queen called governor
in
council said
so.
But
then
Pierre
Trudeau
called our
present
culmination
of this
grand
plan:
"A
short
te
rm
pain
for a
long
term
gain,'
5. lf anyone
cares
to
take
note:
Under s-2 of S 55
of
the
CDSA all Public
Safety will be handed
over
to
NATO under anotherAct
tabled this
time
by
Justin
Trudeau,
with his majority will
pass
the full implementation
of
this seditious act of omission
in
the next Throne
Speach,
[note:
s-2,1]
"without
restricting
the
generality
ofthe foregoing"
Afterthis,
NATO
Federal Courtscan
now
tell Parliament
that
it
holds sole 'across
the board'
jurisdiction
over Public Safety
in
Canada.
1. So
the
cast
is
set,
so
this
new Zionist loving Prime Minister
[at
face value]
can
take that
giant
step of totally abandoning
our Sovereignty over
to NATO
is almosi
a
fail accomplie;
2. EXCEPT FOR THE
FACT
THAT:
Constitutional law under the
SCC is still Supreme
in
Canada, and
a bencher
flike
i'm facing
in
this
BA.R
chargel
is
cdught
in
a
trap
of
serving
two
masters, and must make a
choice.
NAMELY:
Will
this.iudge rebel
by
submitting to this
sedition
[OR]
will
the BCSC benchers rebel and side
with the
SCC as being Supreme?
6.
Frankly,
all
we can do
is
place
our
faith
in
God,
because
the fate
of men
in
Canada becoming
a
banana
republic
in
their
demonic
New
World Order is
held
by
two or three
witnesses, in an
insignificant
side
ruling in
a
case where
the
messenger
will
either be denied the
right
to uphold
the law as Supreme
in
order
to
protect
the fiduciary trust to Canadian
Sovereignty as Supreme.
1.
SOMAKEACHOIGE:
Aswe
understand
it,
this bencher will
either obey
a
Sec 126(2) CC
interference
by
the
new
Attorney
General
or
the conscience of the Minister
of
Justice,
and
this choice is held
by
this new
player
on the scene,
NAMELY:
Jody Wilson
Rayborn
.\'::'
')
i
:,'
11
lr', 1,...
,l],j
MOTION
ON REPEALING
MARC
BOYER'S
616
gPPg(;J.:
:.
-=,'.:
:ir
-
8/19/2019 Original Petition Affidavit
7/13
LLle
Cpp
ru
\(J. r
riat()irl
vt.\col vEIl
R[cts
i]r,
i-
-ii,'PIlE\l8
COURT OF
BRlTISH
COLL\{BI.\
}I.UIC
BOYER
'II{E
C.{\DID.{TL
PETTf IO\ i:R
.{\ D:
C}Iffi F
COXST)SLE CRdIi,,\}.{
RESPONDL\I'
BIIORE TI iT
HO\OLIr.{ELE
CI{ITT
JIJSTICI I]RE\\IR
)6,8o$'n
;r,i;
[,r
or
uey. 2oo5
U.i{lVi'lii
Ri:f
f
liji-\L
Of:
.i REGISTI{:\R
pu:suent
to Rule i {li) oith* Rqles
ci'Coun,
THiS
COTRi
OR-DE,I(S
TIL.\T:
l.
fl:xc
lloyer
is
prohibired
fior: con:rnencing
cr
ccntinuing
any
pr,-.ceedings with
drj.s
cour- exccirt
i:
r:nresente'J bv
e
solicitor.
'flie
Regisrar
shall
oroviCed
aotiiication
of this orCer b1- regrilar rnail io i{arc Boye, a.
f
jlLj
f.
rrrl,
Si.
\',rnuourcr
BC,
r'.f
t
UZ.
4{
3. Illrc
Boyer is
granlrd
ieav€ to file an application to vary or rescintl
this
order
rvithin
?
C;r;s
:i:m
rrr:i;nu
cfthi. crdcr.
ENTERED
MnY
1
:t
?0i15
VAN:OUVER
REgI:-TRY
vitrd?.t:rcLg,.'
-
8/19/2019 Original Petition Affidavit
8/13
Jan
15,2016
Between:
And:
RE: File
No:
S- 15107
as
Vancouver Registry
Petitioner
Respondent
AFFIDAVIT
TO
SUPPORT
MYABNORMAL
BIRTH
ln
World War 2,
my
father
was
a
Lieutenant at Camp Petewawa. When the war ended
[1945],
he
knew that Canada
was
going
to implement this same
Birth
Certificate like England had, and being
an accountant, knew the
importance
of
these entitlement articles
given
to Officers that allowed
them to declare
him and his descendants
to
not be obligated to repay
this
war
debt, and signed
it
as
his
departing
trust /commission upon being
released. Two
years
later,
[1947]
Canada created
The Vital Statistics Act that
implemented this Birth
Statement
/Birth Certificate
protocol.
I
was born in Dec 20,1951
and
the
King died on
Feb
6,1952.
On
Jan7, 1952
this Ontario Offlce
registered
my birth
as
the 665h entry
of
that
year,
and this
#
000665 is
etched
in black
[not
red
ink like
everyone
elsel My Birth Statement
was not immediately
[and
never was]
processed
into
a
Queen's
Birth
Certificate.
Because
of my father's commission, my Statement sat on a shelf for
38
years,
which
means
i
obeyed my fathers death
bed order
to do
my
best to not
get
a
Birth
Certificate, because
iwas
not a million
dollar
baby
[Warehouse
Receipt],
iwas
priceless.
My
father
died on
my
13ih
birthday of cancer.
The whole family was
there
to
witness
the
death
rattle and i could
not
take
the mourning that happened, so
i
left the room and went across the
hall
to the chapel
on
this
hospice ward
to
pray.
I
has
visited
by an angel floating in
a
cloud /aura that
looked
just
like
my father except
healthy. He
told
me
he
was my
guardian
angel, because
i
was
predestined
to
be
a
soldier for Christ, and to
obey
him
when
he interceded.
Ithen
got
a Social
Security Card,
when
this
# was
prohibited
from being
used as any
form
of lD.
Then, in 1984, Mulroney
passed
a
law
saying
that all SSC cards would
be
converted to a
SIN
and
it
would now be
my new lD # under the Charter.
At that
time,
i
got
my
first clear order from this
angel
to
leave
the country, because if
i
was not in Canada on Jan
1"t,
1985 meant
that they could
not convert this card
into
a SIN
card.
So
i
originally
went
to
Florida where
i
enjoyed
a
good
life,
ln November 1988,
i
applied for a Passport
at
the Canadian
Consulate
in
Los
Angeles
[file
# 88-
3617311.
A
few weeks later,
i
was called
into this office, where they
asked
me
to change
a
'no' to
a'yes'to
thisquestion: Do
you
want
a
Bifth
Ceftificate?
Atthetimeiasked
if
this
question
would
be asked if
iwas
in Canada,
and
they said
'no'.
I
then asked
if
this was a landed
issue?
They
said
'yes',
and
I
asked them, does
that
mean
i
get
to
choose?
She said
yes,
and
this
meeting
was
in
order
to
make
sure
that i
understood
the
question,
because it's highly
unusual
to
check
'no'.
At this
point,
i
told this Consular General
that
i made
this
'no'
choice,
because my father had
made
it
clear
to never
be
the
property
of this
paper
queen,
if
i
could avoid
it,
and they accepted
it.
A few weeks later in the mail, i
got
a
Passport and this defaced Birth
Statement,
and that night,
my son MarcAnthony Boyer
was
conceived.
We left for
Brazil shortly there after, because there
was
a
ban
on
flying such a long
distance, after the
first
trimester, and because
i
was warned by
close
friends that there
were these highly suspicious
men in black
looking
for
me.
We returned to
Florida, when my son
was
about
5 months old,
and we started
a
foreign
owned
small business,
and
iquasi-legally
worked for her.
[i
owe no taxes,
so says the lRS, when
iwas
deported
in
2008]
ln the Supreme Court
of
British
Columbia
THE LAW SOCIETY
OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
Marc
Pierre Boyer
L
4.
5.
6.
-
8/19/2019 Original Petition Affidavit
9/13
7. ln
1996,
she divorced me
shortly
and
after being
diagnosed
with
lymphoma,
i returned
to canada
This angel
told
me
to
go
to Bc,
where
iwould
be
needed
later.
on
Nov
13,
1gg9,
i crossed
the
border,
and i
then
got
my
flrst
and
only flu-shot,
which
kicked
my
lymphoma
into
full
gear.
On
the evening
of
9/1'1,
i had
a
very
lucid
dream,
where
i
was
told
the
recipe
to make
my
remarcable
Soma cookies,
in order
to
cure my
ever
increasing
cancer
pains,
and
to
run
with
it.
8.
At that
time,
i made myself
a royal
pain
at City Hall, in order
to
have
my
landed
on
land
in
Canada
status
be
established, and
to
pursue
a
common law
defence,
under
the Marijuana
party.
I
was
eventually charged
for
protesting
too
aggressively
at
City
Hall
in
Jan
Srh,2004, and
then
in Sept
28th,2004,
for
operating a
commercial
premise
known as the
Vancouver
East
Marijuana
party
Headquarters,
where
at
the Arraignment
in
November 1Orh
2004,
i
got
the
charges
dropped, and i
was
to
appear in
a
week
to file for
damages, because
i
filed
this
17-page
article
entitled
NOTICE
OF DENIAL
OF CONSENTTO
BE GOVERNED,
and
that
evening
my
chest
plate
was
snapped in
2, by two
VPD
duty
Sargents,
and
that
morning i
died, and
had
a
face
to
face
contact
with
this
angel
[as
if
in
a
white
cloud]
that i met
when
iwas
13
[on
this]
my
father was
54,
and
i was
now
54, and this angel looked
just
like
me;
At
the
end of
this
meeting,
i was
swallowed
by
the
heart of
the
earth,
[for
lack of any other
term
to
explain it]
and
returned
with
this
partial
mended
broken
chest
plate.
A few days later,
I
went to VGH,
where
i
got
X-rays
that
showed
the
fracture
was real.
SIDE BAR lin
hindsight] this event signalled Daniel 8:14, because
2300 mornings
later,
the
tidal
wave
that struck Fukushima
hit,
where
lfor
at
Ieast
a week
before] i
clearly
warned
authority
with
a Get
Well
Soon card that
something
big
was
about
to happen
on
that day.
1.
I reported this broken chest
incident
at my next court
appearance,
and as
to
instructions
given
at
this
1st arraignment,
i boldly filed
this
priceless gift
from
God
/damage
award
that
is
actually
still
a default
judgment,
yet
swept away and
destroyed
by Wally
Oppal.
[Sec
340
FRAUD].
9. I then
filed
a legal
paper
trap
with Revenue
Canada-,
which
gave
me
a
great
civil
defence
that took
.
4 months
to set-up, i filed
a Petition
to
have this
criminal
case file
dealt
with
civilly.
.Eollowing
this
1"r appearance
[where
i
got
what
i
call
my court
victory]
i was
slapped with
this
gag
order.'
10.
At this criminal
trial
[on
this Party
Headquarters
charges]
a
miraculous
twist
in
fate
happened,
where
my sentence
was
read the
day after
the
Election
writ
dropped,
and
point
7 now
made
an
erroneous
claim
that i was
mis'taken'
to
believe that
the
Elections
Act offered
me
any immunity.
1.
ON THIS:
Wthout
this
quirk,
i could
never have a
chance
to
add
a trust
challenge
[by
means
of
a
caveat
to
my candidacyl
that
caused JP Kingsley,
his
Clerk, and
the Chief
Justice
to
resign
in late December
2005,
over a flduciary
trust
violation
that
i set
up
in
this
trap
/caveat.
11.
I
rekindled
the
issue
of
getting
the
$1000.
deposit returned
this spring,
for
the
2004/05
election.
and in order
to
comply
with
their
prescribed
paperwork,
i
filed all
the
proper
articles
to
get
this
deposit
back.
The flle
was
cleared
for
payment
after
being scrutinized,
and
filed
on
time
by our
Party's
auditor.
As
to
Elections Canada's original estimate, we
should have
received
this
check,
before
the
new
election
campaign
started. They
knew
that iwas
going
to
court
with
or
without
this
check,
and
since
Mr Buhler
has added
this case
that
involves
lves
coie,
actually
means,
i
can
have
this
court
rule
on
ihis
check,
because
we
see
it
as
an
essential
element
inihis
Civil
Claim.
AFFIRMED
BEFORE
ME at Vancouver,
)
British
Columbia,
on
'-hnr.r;rnr
t1i
.?{rtt-
)
, iriii:
",r,,r,,i;,r1,),t,rIfnrii,liir,ljr.rirrl,,i,l
-iil
i
Lr,iriil
aiJ, ri,i
Marc
Pierre Boyer
i"l(,r.ir1[,ir'.I
(tr.iinr|ii,::
it"',':1'3
r-
i
i'
;:"
i]"
:-ri'':rr'l
-
8/19/2019 Original Petition Affidavit
10/13
THIS FOOTNOTE
does
not
fit
the
format
of
an Affidavit
BUT
it
is
submitted
as the
truth:
1.
As we
see ft; l've
limited
the
legal case law information
in
this Affidavit
to
basically
the
original
root case file
that
caused the original
gag
order.
Everything
between
then
and now is still viewed
by
me
as
just
one
count of
a
breach of fiduciary
trust.
The
$1
000. deposit is an essential element,
in connecting all
of
the
liability created across
a decade, because it
can
be used as
an
lnstrument
to dispense
my bond
value,
which
by itself, is designed
to
redeem
all
debt in
the world. I
prey
for
'tribulation
good',
because
the
alternative is
irrevocable.
lt's
not my
choice
what
authority decides,
i
simply cannot shrink
from
pressing for
the
impossible, because
the
impossible is inevitable.
2.
The
origins
of
this
Birth Statement
and its
wicked
cousin
the
Birth Certificate
were
originally
created
in
Sumer
/Nineveh.
The use of these
forms
were
mentioned in
Exodus
1 : 8
thru
1 1
,
where the
new
king knew nothing about
Joseph,
and brought
in the slave
masters
to
oppress
them, AND 430
years
later Moses crossed
the
Nile
to
liberate lsrael from these slavery bonds.
3.
As
to
Galatians 2:17,
i'm
justAbraham's
seed,
and my abnormal birth landed in 1989
[430
years
after the
Act
of
the
Supremacy of God
-15591,
and
Abraham's
trust
is
being augmented
from
being
'of
God'to
being'with God'.
This NOTION changes
everything,
and
it
prepares
the
way
to
orderly
inherit
the
earth;
where
by upholding God's
creation,
we
share in
the
burden, and in this
way we
share
in
the
glory,
which
signals
the
return of
the
Sons of
the
Living God,
who
liberate
the
creation
itself
from
its bondage
to
decay, and
in
this
way we witness a new creation,
[Rom
8:18on]
4.
As we
see ft.'
The
firm
roots of
this
New
World Order
was
implemented 3-years after
'the
Act',
when in
1563, the
Act
of Supremacy
of
Parliament
was implemented:
Jefferson actually
called
this
Act
'the
original
depafture of
principle'
-
and
[also]
as to this Galatians
prophecy
timeline of
430
years
later,
lin
1993]
NAFTAwas
voted in, and that could only occur with
the
oath to
the
BAR
being converted, and
exactly as
to
prophecy,
it can never
get
better
without
rejecting
the
basic
foundation
of
an entire social structure
called
law and order
that
is
based
on
the
love
of
money.
1 . To my knowledge, JP
Kingsley held
the
trust, and
pressed
a
yes
vote on this
new
oath
change
AND again,
there
is this connection
with
this
case file and Marc Mayrand
/lves
Cote's trust,
because
the
check
that
Elections Canada
hand us settles an account on JP Kinsley's watch.
5.
Romans
9:
23on mentions
the
riches
of this damage award
[as
a, what
ifl,
then
my
abnormal
Birth
Statements fits
the
next
riddle:
it refers
to
my
people
not
being my
people
[37300
-
i'm now
landed on
water
in
Californial
and
my mother being this
#
37300
[where
i hold some Title to
property
while on
waterl
and the
very
event
where
i
said'you
are not my
people'did
occur at an
arraignment
hearing before Judge
Kitchen,
where i was
referring
to
a row of
vested
rabbis
that
appeared as
witness at
this
bail
hearing.
[i
ordered transcripts, so it's on
record]
As
to
Rom 10,
i'm
pressing
this offer
on a
people
who
are
not a nation, and for
the
past
10
years
i've been
relentless
at
making offers
to
a disobedient
and obstinate
people.
Romans
11
refers to
this
spirit
of stupor
being lifted
[metanoia
/grand
awakening];
it then
refers
to
good
first
fruit,
and
your
destiny
is
eventually
based on
how
you
handle
this
trap
/stumbling
block created
by'the
one'.
6.
Think
about
it,
there can't be bad first
fruit,
until good first
fruit
has been rejected, once
too
often.
lf every last curse
of Revelation or Ezekiel
or all those
prophets
of
doom
must be fulfilled, then
Jesus Christ died
for
nothing.
las
to
Ephesians
6:101 We're supposed
fo vesl
ourse/ves
with this
breast
plate
of
ighteousness.
This baftle is
not
on flesh
and blood,
but
against the
dark
forces
of
this
world.
Good first
fruit
liberates
the evil in
those
who
otherwise remain the evil ones
that
God
liberates
/saves
all
the
meek from. Either
way,
the
meek inherit
the earth.
I
prey
for
good
first fruit.
-
8/19/2019 Original Petition Affidavit
11/13
-
8/19/2019 Original Petition Affidavit
12/13
-
8/19/2019 Original Petition Affidavit
13/13
8&'-
3a/73/
_----*
,,('
0{}0s65