th th9 to 10 January - 2016

Organized By :

Justitia

L bertai

s

enM oa nva Sh Ad Aa RM C . R M . oN o . tf inor gP

Introduction

The First Prof. N.R. Madhava Menon SAARC Mooting Competition and Law Students

Conference- 2016 is being organized by Lloyd Law College under technical support

from MILAT-Menon Institute of Legal Advocacy, Trivandrum at Lloyd Law College,

Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.

For the year 2016, there will be two stages of the competition. The Indian Round and the

SAARC Round for India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Bhutan, Nepal

and Maldives. th thThe Indian Round shall be held from 9 to 10 January, 2016 at Lloyd Law College, Greater

th thNoida. The SAARC Round shall be held from 4 to 5 March, 2016 at Lloyd Law College,

Greater Noida.

A conference of law students from SAARC countries will also be held along with the thMooting Competition on 6 March, 2016 at Lloyd Law College. The idea is to provide a

forum for interaction among the law students of South Asian region for excellence in legal

education and professional development. Understanding the legal system of each others'

country will be mutually beneficial in the context of professional development, trade in

legal services and law reform. The topic for the 2016 law student conference is “Legal

Education in SAARC countries : Opportunities and Challenges”.

Naming the Competition and the Conference

Lloyd Law College was established under the genesis of Satilila Charitable Society (SCS)

in the year 2003. The college is affiliated to Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut

and the affiliation is approved by the Bar Council of India. It imparts two professional

degree programs, namely five year integrated B.A.,LL.B. and the three year LL.B. course.

Lloyd Law College is located in Knowledge Park – II, Greater Noida, India. The

1

About Lloyd Law College

The reform brought about in Indian legal education by the pioneering efforts of Prof. N.R.

Madhava Menon during the last three decades through the Five Year Integrated B.A.,LL.B.

programme under the National Law School experiment is the inspiration for Llyod Law

College sponsoring the Mooting Competition in his name. On retirement from active

service, he continues to contribute to the cause of legal education and professional

development through the Menon Institute of Legal Advocacy Training (MILAT) which he

presides. Lloyd Law College is proud to be associated with MILAT in launching the

Mooting event for the benefit of law students of South Asian countries.

campus is spread over five acres of lush green area, with excellent infrastructure, moot

court rooms, fully-air conditioned classrooms with smart-boards and a state of the art

library. Highly qualified, dedicated and experienced faculty is one of the strengths of Lloyd

Law College.

In the year 2014, Lloyd Law College organized the National Round of 'The Louis M

Brown and Forrest S Mosten International Client Consultation Competition, as well thas the 30 Bar Council of India Trust All India Inter-University Moot Court

Competition. The college also organized the 'International Client Consultation

Competition' (National Round)-2013 in association with Forum of South Asian

Clinical Law Teachers.

Lloyd Law College can be reached at lloydlawcollege.com/

Message from President

I am extremely happy to note that Lloyd Law College, Greater Noida has achieved

a covetable position in the legal education scenario during the last ten years of its

existence. Our vision was to produce quality lawyers with great human values.

This has been achieved to a large extent with our students either by joining the

profession as practicing lawyers, or by securing placement in reputed law firms in

India and abroad and

thon 6 March, 2016.

This competition provides a common platform for the students of different law

also by their selection as judges by clearing the Judicial

Services Examination. We give great importance to moot court and skills

development activities of the students by not only hosting such competitions in

our law college but also by encouraging our students to participate in

competitions in India and abroad and I am happy to learn that our students have

secured prizes in prestigious competitions organized by reputed institutions.

Our college along with Menon Institute of Legal Advocacy and Training (MILAT)

is organizing the First Prof. N.R. Madhava Menon SAARC Mooting th thCompetition and Law Students Conference, 2016 during 4 – 6 March 2016.

This Mooting Competition shall consist of an 'Indian Round' and the 'SAARC

Round', along with a 'Law Students Conference'. The Indian Round to select th threpresentative teams from India shall be held during 9 & 10 January, 2016. The

SAARC Mooting Round comprising of participants from SAARC Countries i.e.

India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Afghanistan and Maldives th thshall be held on 4 & 5 March, 2016. The Law Students Conference shall be held

2

institutions to exchange notes and also to learn from experienced legal experts.

Such interactions will help them in advancing their career opportunities.

I convey my good wishes to all the students/participants for achieving success in

their professional career.

I am sure that with the sincere efforts and hard work put in by the students, staff

and faculty in organizing the competition, it is going to be a grand success. I wish

all the best for the success of the competition.

Lloyd Law College can be reached at lloydlawcollege.com

3

RULES AND REGULATIONS OF INDIAN ROUND OF SAARC MOOTING COMPETITION

1)The First Prof. N. R. Madhava Menon SAARC Mooting Competition and Law Students

Conference- 2016 aims at honing legal advocacy skills among law students of SAARC

countries.

2)The First Prof. N. R. Madhava Menon SAARC Mooting Competition and Law Students

Conference- 2016 shall consist of an Indian Round and the SAARC Round, along with a

Law Students Conference to be held at Lloyd Law College, Greater Noida, India.

th th 3)The Indian Round shall be held from 9 - 10 January, 2016.

4)The SAARC Round comprising of participants from SAARC Countries i.e. India,

Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Afghanistan and Maldives shall be held th thfrom 4 & 5 March, 2016.

th5)The Law Students Conference shall be held on 6 March, 2016 on the topic “Legal

Education in SAARC Countries: Opportunities and Challenges"

6) Only Top Five Teams From The Indian Round Shall Qualify to Represent India in the

SAARC Round.

ARTICLE 1: Objective of the Competition

th th(1)The Indian Round will be held at Lloyd Law College, Greater Noida from 9 -10

January, 2016 among student teams from various Colleges and Universities imparting the

teaching of Law in India, provided that no Institution shall send more than one team to

compete in the Indian Round.

(2) The Indian Round will be limited to Forty (40) entries. It will be held in One Round

comprising of Two Stages, i.e., arguments from both sides (Petitioner / Respondent).

(3) The Forty (40) entries to the competition will be decided on the basis of first-come-first-

served.

(4) The TOP FIVE Scoring Teams in the Indian Round will qualify for the SAARC Round

representing India.

ARTICLE 2: The Indian Round

4

(5) Each participating team in the Indian Round shall argue the case from both the

petitioner and the respondent sides in Two Stages respectively and in One Round Only,

wherefrom the Top Five Scoring Teams shall qualify further to the SAARC Round and the

Law Students Conference. No derogation is permissible from this rule.

(6) There shall be a Committee of Judges for each Court selected from a Panel of Judges

constituted for the purpose which will include One Law Teacher, One Practising Lawyer

and One National Level Ex-Mooter.

(1) Each team shall consist of Two Counsels and One Researcher in the Indian Round. Each

of whom:-

st(i) must have been born on or after 1 January, 1986; and

th(ii)on the 09 January, 2016 is a bonafide undergraduate law student (for the year 2015-

2016 till June 2016) of the Three Year Scheme or Five Year Scheme from an institution

duly recognized by the Bar Council of India; and

(iii) has not been admitted to the practice of law in any jurisdiction.

(2) Each college or institution shall send only One Team of such eligible participants.

(3) In no case any team shall consist of more than three participants, that is, Two (2)

Mooters and One (1) Researcher. Their number cannot be increased under any

circumstances. The travelling expenses of the participants shall be met by their respective

institution or participants themselves. However transport facility shall be extended during

the competition between Lloyd Law College and nearest metro station, accommodation

and venue inter se.

ARTICLE 3: Team Composition and Eligibility

1)The registration fee for the Indian Round is Rs. 2,500/-

2) All teams participating in the Indian Round shall register themselves through payment

of registration fee by E-Transfer available on Lloyd Law College website and subsequent

Email of (successful) transaction details/ or by Demand Draft and subsequent Email of

Soft Copy of Demand Draft, which shall be submitted alongwith duly filled Registration

ARTICLE 4: Registration

5

Form to profmenonmooting@lloydedu.in by 11:59 p.m. IST on 15-12-2015

3)The Hard Copy of Demand Draft shall be submitted not later than 10:00 a.m. IST by 09-

01-2016 through post or deposit in hand with the Organizing Committee, Lloyd Law

College, Plot No. 11, Knowledge Park- II Greater Noida - 201306, Delhi/NCR.

4)The participating teams are mandatorily required to send the completed registration form

attached herewith on or before 15-12-2015 not later than 05:00 p.m. via e-mail to

profmenonmooting@lloydedu.in

5)No subsequent change in the team composition shall be permitted.

6)The demand draft of Rs.2,500/- shall be drawn in favour of LLOYD LAW COLLEGE,

GREATER NOIDA, and shall be payable at GREATER NOIDA.

th7)Formal registration of the teams shall be done on 09 January, 2016 at the venue of the

competition from 09:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m.

8)Registration forms/demand draft/E-transfer received after deadlines shall in no case be

considered for registration.

(1) The moot proposition for the Indian Round can be downloaded from

http://lloydlawcollege.com from 26 -11- 2015 onwards.

(2) All Queries and Clarifications for the moot problem shall be addressed to

profmenonmooting@lloydedu.in.

(3) No Queries and Clarifications for the moot problem shall be entertained after 20-

12-2015.

(4) Clarifications on the moot problem will be declared on http://lloydlawcollege.com

for everyone's perusal without disclosure of the identity of the teams which raised

them.

ARTICLE 5: The Moot Proposition

ARTICLE 6: Memorials

(1)Each team shall submit soft copies of the Memorials to the Organizing Committee of

Lloyd Law College, Greater Noida by 02-01-2016 through e-mail to

profmenonmooting@lloydedu.in

6

(2)Each team shall also submit five (5) hard copies of the Memorials to the Organizing

Committee of Lloyd Law College, Greater Noida on 09-01-2016 by 10:00 a.m. IST at the

time of formal registration at the venue.

(3)Memorials must be submitted on the standard international A/4 Size Page in Font Type:

Times New Roman, Font Size: 12, Double Spacing. The Font Style of the Footnote should

also be Times New Roman, Font Size:10 and should be singly spaced. Quotations from

sources outside of the memorial of Fifty (50) words or more in any part of the memorial

shall be block quoted (i.e. right and left indented) and must be single spaced.

th(4)The citation should be in compliance with the 20 edition of Bluebook. Speaking

footnotes or Endnotes are not allowed.

(5)No indication shall be made for identifying the Institution/College of the participant and

on arrival, each team will be awarded a CODE NUMBER and that number alone shall be

marked on the memorials.

(6)The petitioner and respondent memorials must be differentiated by 'Blue Cover' and

'Red Cover' respectively.

(7)Memorials for both sides should contain the following:

(a)Title Page

(b)Table of Contents

(c)Index of Authorities

(d) Statement of Jurisdiction

(e) Statement of Facts

(f) Summary of Arguments/Pleadings

(g) Arguments Supported by the Authorities

(h) Conclusion / Prayer

The Title Page shall include:

(a)The Name of the Court

(b)The Year of the Competition

(c)The Name of the Case

(d)The Title of the Document (i.e., “Memorial for the Respondent” or “Memorial

7

for the Petitioner”)

(8)The memorial shall not exceed more than Thirty (30) pages. The following contents

are inclusive within the stipulated page limit:

(a)Pleadings (b)Conclusions

(c)Annexure, if any (d)Appendices and Footnotes

Any issue or pleading, not discussed within the above mentioned contents of the Memorial

shall not be included in any other section of the Memorial.

The following shall not be included in the limit of Thirty (30) pages set out for the

Memorial:

(a)Title Page

(b)Table of Contents

(c)Index of Authorities

(d)Statement of Jurisdiction

(e)Statement of Facts

(f) Issues Presented

(g) Summary of Pleadings

(9)Statement of the Facts: The Statement of the Facts shall be limited to the facts as

stipulated as well as to the necessary inferences drawn from the proposition. The Statement

of the Facts must not include unsupported facts, distortions of stated facts, argumentative

statements, or legal conclusions. An excessive Statement of the Facts shall be a 'Non-

Discretionary Memorial Penalty', but such violation may be taken into account by the

judges while evaluating the written submission.

(10) Summary of the Pleadings: The Summary of the Pleadings shall consist of a

substantive summary of the “Pleadings”, rather than a simple reproduction of the headings

contained in the Pleadings Section. An excessive Summary of Pleadings shall be a Non-

Discretionary Memorial Penalty, while a Summary of Pleadings which is otherwise

improper shall not be subjected to a Memorial Penalty, but such violation may be taken into

account by the judges while evaluating the written submission.

(11) The teams are to submit authorities supporting their contentions referred to in the

memorials at the time of oral presentation but at no stage are they allowed to supplement

the memorial in the form of annexure, compilation etc. which may otherwise amount to

exceeding page limit of the memorial.

8

(1)The memorials shall be assessed by a Committee of Judges and every memorial will be

marked out of total Hundred (100) marks and the Team Memorial will have the average

total of both the sides (Petitioner/Respondent). The Marking Criteria and the Marks

Allocated to each Category are listed below:

ARTICLE 7: Assessment of the Memorials

Criteria

1.Knowledge of facts and law (Minimum: 10 pts; Maximum: 20 pts)

2.Proper and articulate analysis (Minimum: 10 pts; Maximum: 20 pts)

3.Extent and use of research (Minimum: 10 pts; Maximum: 20 pts)

4.Clarity & Organization (Minimum: 10 pts; Maximum: 20 pts)

5.Citation of sources (Minimum: 5 pts; Maximum: 10 pts)

6.Grammar and Style (Minimum: 5 pts; Maximum: 10 pts)

(A)THE INDIAN ROUND

(1)Each Oral Round shall consist of Ninety (90) minutes of oral pleadings. Each team

Petitioner/Respondent shall be allotted Forty Five (45) minutes.

(2)Two (2) members from each team shall make oral presentations during the round. Prior

to the beginning of the Oral Round, each team shall indicate to the bailiff as to how it

wishes to allocate its 45 minutes among:

(a) Its First Oralist,

(b) Its Second Oralist, and

(c) Rebuttal (for the Petitioner) or Sur-Rebuttal (for the Respondent).

(3) No single oralist shall plead for more than Thirty (30) minutes, including rebuttal or sur-

rebuttal. Any team member may act as an oralist during any round of the competition. In

exceptional circumstances, the Bench shall have the discretion to permit a single oralist to

argue beyond Thirty (30) minutes limit.

(4) The order of the pleadings in each Round at all levels of the Competition shall be:

ARTICLE 8: Oral Presentations

9

Petitioner 1 Petitioner 2 Respondent 1 Respondent 2

Rebuttal (Petitioner 1 or 2) Sur-rebuttal (Respondent 1 or 2)

(1)Each team may reserve up to Fifteen (15) minutes of rebuttal or sub- rebuttal. As a

gesture of courtesy to the judges, the participating teams should announce whether they

intend to reserve any time for rebuttal or sub-rebuttal at the beginning of their oral

arguments and how much time they intend to reserve. Failure to announce it will not waive

the right to rebuttal or sub-rebuttal. Only one Team member may deliver the rebuttal or sub-

rebuttal. Although the team member delivering rebuttal or sub- rebuttal must be one of the

two team members who argued during the team's main argument, the team need not

indicate prior to rebuttal or sub- rebuttal which of its two eligible members will offer

rebuttal or sub- rebuttal.

(2)A team's oral pleadings shall not in any way be limited to the scope of the team's

memorial. The scope of the Petitioner's rebuttal shall be limited to responding to the

Respondent's primary oral pleadings, and the scope of the Respondent's sur-rebuttal shall

be limited to responding to the Petitioner's rebuttal. If the Petitioner waives the rebuttal,

there shall be no sur-rebuttal. No legal issues which were not addressed in the primary

pleadings may be raised in the rebuttal or sur-rebuttal.

ARTICLE 9: Marking Criteria for the Oral Presentations

(1)The judges would assign marks to each individual speaker out of Fifty (50)

marks. The team score would be the aggregate of the total marks for oral

presentations of the 2 speakers out of Hundred (100) marks. The following shall be

the Marking Criteria and the Marks allocated to each category;

Oral Presentation Criteria

1. Knowledge of Law (30) Excellent (27-30 pts); Very Good (24-27 pts); Good

(21-24 pts); Adequate (19-21 pts); Poor (15-19 pts.)

2. Application of Law to Facts (25) Excellent (23-25 pts); Very Good

(21-23 pts); Good (19-21pts); Adequate (16-19 pts); Poor (15-16 pts.)

3. Ingenuity and Ability to Answer Questions (30) Excellent (27-30 pts);

Very Good (24-27 pts); Good (21-24 pts); Adequate (19-21 pts); Poor (15-19 pts.)

10

4. Style, Poise, Courtesy and Demeanour (10) Excellent (9-10 pts);

Very Good (8-9 pts); Good (7-8 pts); Adequate (5-7 pts); Poor (4-5 pts.)

5. Time Management and Organization (5) Excellent (5 pts); Very Good

(4 pts); Good (3 pts); Adequate (3 pts); Poor (1 pt.)

ARTICLE 10: Disputes

(1)Any dispute about the Moot Court Competition shall be referred to the Dispute

Resolution Committee, comprising of the Chairperson, the Co-Chairperson and the

Organizing Secretary, before the end of the competition. In all matters of complaints or

disputes, the decision of the Dispute Resolution Committee shall be final.

ARTICLE 11: Code of Conduct

(1)The language for the Moot Court Competition shall be English.

(2)All participants are expected to maintain the decorum in the Court during the

competition and are expected to conduct themselves in a manner befitting the legal

profession.

(3)Scouting: Speakers, a reserve or persons affiliated with the team, will not be permitted

to hear the arguments in any court room in which the team is not one of the contesting teams

whilst the team is still in the competition.

ARTICLE 12: Awards for Indian Round

(1)The Top Five Scoring teams in the Indian Round shall qualify for participation in the

SAARC Round and the Law Students Conference of the First N. R. Madhava Menon

SAARC Mooting Competition – 2016 which is the International SAARC Round to be held th thamong SAARC countries from 4 March, 2016 to 6 March, 2016 at Lloyd Law College,

Greater Noida, India.

(2)The Top Five Scoring Teams shall be awarded certificates of qualification to the

SAARC Round.

ARTICLE 13: Accommodation

(1)The team of Three (3) participants shall be provided accommodation by Lloyd Law

College for the duration of the competition only. However, the interested students are

11

required to inform the Organizing Committee, through their Registration Form, so as to

enable the Committee to make necessary arrangements.

ARTICLE 14: General Section

(1)The duration of each court shall not exceed one hour and thirty minutes.

(2)Depending upon the number of participating teams, the competition may be held in two

or more stages - however it shall comprise only one round i.e. Elimination Round.

(3)The number of qualifying teams for the SAARC Round may be increased or decreased

(not less than Five in any case) subject to the number of participating teams.

(4)Team numbers and the side to be represented (petitioner/respondent) shall be decided

by draw of lots at different Stages during the competition. The scheme of competition thus

drawn out shall be notified to the participating teams.

(5)The organizers reserve the right to make any necessary alterations in respect to the side

to be taken by the competing teams, in case it becomes absolutely necessary due to

withdrawal of any team/teams at the last minute, or if the competing teams had no

opportunity to argue the other side of the problem.

(6)Each team is expected to be ready with written briefs and oral arguments to argue from

either side of the case. The court will follow its own procedure within the accepted norms

and judicial practice, and in case of doubt or dispute in the matter of procedure or facts, the

decision of the Presiding Member of the Committee of Judges of each Court shall be final.

12

ANNEXURE ON DISQUALIFICATION AND PENALTIES

ARTICLE A1: Aims

(1) The present Annexure on Disqualifications and Penalties forms an integral part of the

Official Rules of the First Prof. N. R. Madhava Menon SAARC Competition - 2016

(Indian Round).

(2) The aim of the Annexure on Disqualifications and Penalties is to ensure a fair and

objective contest in the First Prof. N. R. Madhava Menon SAARC Competition - 2016

(Indian Round) by providing guidelines for ensuring compliance with the relevant

provisions of the Official Rules.

ARTICLE A2: Cheating, Intimidation and Misconduct

(1) Cheating or using of unfair means of any kind is strictly prohibited and if indulged

in, shall result in disqualification of the team.

(2) Intimidation in any form is prohibited and if indulged in, shall result in

disqualification of the team.

(3) Misconduct, whether behavioral or otherwise, is not allowed and if indulged in, shall

result in disqualification of the team.

ARTICLE A3: Court Manners (Oral Arguments)

(1) Any form of communication between the Bar table and any person other than those

on the Bench is prohibited, and if indulged in, will result in a penalty point.

(2) Submission of any written material other than the memorials and any other

documents related to the proposition in hand to the Bench prior to, during or after oral

arguments, is not allowed and if indulged in, will result in a penalty point.

(3) Failure to deliver an oral argument shall be considered in entirety, a disqualification.

(4) It shall be the discretion of the Organizing Committee to decide on any violation of

the provisions of Articles 6, 7, or 8 of the Rules and Regulations during the rounds and

whether that violation entails a penalty point. If a participating team, member of the Bench

or the time keeper wishes to claim a violation of Articles 6, 7, or 8, the Bench shall

inform the Organizing Committee of the claim made and shall not consider it as a part of

their deliberations unless directed to do so by the Organizing Committee.

ARTICLE A4: Submission and Formating of the Memorials

(1) Delay in the submission of the memorials, use of incorrect font or font size, use of

font of inconsistent size, or improper line spacing, failure to include all parts of the

memorial, or inclusion of an unremunerated part, substantive legal argument outside of

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

13

approved sections of memorial, improperly formatted index of authorities, excessive

length, failure to include necessary information on the memorial cover, inclusion of any

identifying mark, character or text in the memorial shall result in imposition of penalties.

ARTICLE A5: Dress Code

(1) Strict adherence to the Dress Code is required. The teams are required to be properly

attired for the rounds. The participants are required to wear ‘Black Trousers / Skirts’ and

‘White Shirt’, ‘Black Blazers’ and ‘ Black Neck Tie’.

ARTICLE A6: Non-compliance with the Rules of the Organizing Committee

(1) The participants are required to comply with the rules formulated by the Organizing

Committee at all times during the First Prof. N. R. Madhava Menon SAARC

Competition - 2016.

(2) Total points collected by a team shall be reduced by the penalty points imposed for

the violation of rules specified by the Organizing Committee for each round in which

the violation took place.

(3) Each penalty point shall be imposed for each violation. One penalty point imposed

shall reduce one mark from the score of the team. However, the total number of penalty

points awarded against one team shall not surpass 10 points.

(4) If the number of penalties increases from Ten (10) in numbers, the team can be

debarred from the competition. An opportunity of being heard by the Organizing

Committee can be offered to the team on request. The Committee shall decide whether

to debar that particular team from further participation in the competition or reduce the

marks from the total score obtained by that team.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

14

REGISTRATION FORM (INDIAN ROUND)

Name of the Institution

Address

Telephone No.

Fax No.

E-Mail

Website

Draft Details

FIRST ORALIST

Name

Gender

Year of study

Telephone/ Mobile No.

E-Mail

SECOND ORALIST

Name

Gender

Year of study

Telephone/Mobile No.

E-Mail

RESEARCHER

Name

Gender

Year of study

Telephone/ Mobile No.

E-Mail

OFFICIAL TEAM CONTACT

Name

Designation

Telephone No.

E-Mail

: .........................................................................................

: .........................................................................................

: .........................................................................................

: .........................................................................................

: .........................................................................................

: .........................................................................................

: .........................................................................................

: .........................................................................................

: .........................................................................................

: .........................................................................................

: .........................................................................................

: .........................................................................................

: .........................................................................................

: .........................................................................................

: .........................................................................................

: .........................................................................................

: .........................................................................................

: .........................................................................................

: .........................................................................................

: .........................................................................................

: .........................................................................................

: .........................................................................................

: .........................................................................................

: .........................................................................................

: .........................................................................................

: .........................................................................................

15

ACCOMMODATION

Accommodation Required Yes No

Date and Time of Arrival : ......................................................................................

Mode of Transportation: Train/Bus/Any other (specify) : ......................................

Date and Time of Departure : .................................................................................

Signature and Seal of the Head of Institution

Date :

Place :

Last Date for Submission of Registration Form: 15-12-2015.

Please Email Duly Filled Registration Form to

profmenonmooting@lloydedu.in

NOTE: Instructions relating to food, travel and accommodation shall be

conveyed upon registration.

16

Date of Announcement of Competition

Last Date for Registration by E-Transfer & Uploading Demand Draft

Last Date for Registration by Submission of Demand Draft (Hard Copy)

Release of Moot Problem for Indian Round

Last Date for Clarification on Moot Problem

Submission of Memorials (SOFT COPY) for Indian Round

Submission of Memorials (5 HARD COPIES)

Indian Round Ist Stage

Indian Round IInd Stage

Registration of Participants

Inauguration

Group Photo

Draw of Lots & Exchange of Memorials

Lunch

Competition Ist Stage

''

Tea

Draw of Lots & Exchange of Memorials for IInd Stage

Dinner

Competition IInd Stage

''

Lunch

Declaration of Result of Indian Round

Dispersal

th thIMPORTANT DATES FOR INDIAN ROUND (9 & 10 January, 2016)

DATES FOR REGISTRATIONth

26 November, 2015

th15 December, 2015

th09 January, 2016

th26 November, 2015

th20 December, 2015

nd02 January, 2016

th09 January, 2016

th09 January, 2016

th10 January, 2016

09:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m.

11:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon

12.00 noon

12:15 p.m. to 01:00 p.m.

01:00 p.m. to 02:00 p.m.

02:00 p.m. to 03:30 p.m.

04:30 p.m. to 06:00 p.m.

06:15 p.m.

07:00 p.m.

07:15 p.m. to 08:15 p.m.

09:00 a.m. to 10.30 a.m.

11:00 a.m. to 12.30 p.m.

01:15 p.m.

02:30 p.m.

After 2.30 p.m.

DATES FOR MEMORIALS

DATE OF COMPETITION

SCHEDULE FOR INDIAN ROUND

9th January

10th January

17

FOUNDING COMMITTEE

Chief Patron

Prof. (Dr.) N.R. Madhava Menon

Chairperson

Mr. Manohar Thairani, President,

Lloyd Law College

ADMINISTRATOR - INDIA

Dr. Lisa P. Lukose, Associate Professor GGSIP University, New Delhi

Co - Chairperson

Prof. (Dr.) S. Sivakumar,

Indian Law Institute,

Honorary Secretary, MILAT

ORGANIZING COMMITTEE

Mr. Akhilesh Kumar Khan

Chief Coordinator

Coordinators

+91-8800621117 hod@lloydedu.inHead of Department, Lloyd Law College

Mr. Aakash Sharma +91-9899007303 aakash@lloydedu.inAssistant Professor, Lloyd Law College

Mr. Ankit Rai +91-9935733090 ankit@lloydedu.inAssistant Professor, Lloyd Law College

+91-8826386770 deepika@lloydedu.inMs. Deepika KambojAssistant Professor, Lloyd Law College

18

STEERING COMMITTEE

STUDENT COORDINATORS

General Coordinator Prof. (Dr.) Saleem Akhtar

Logistics Coordinator Mr. Venugopal Menon

Administration Coordinator Ms. Meena Paul

Finance Coordinator Mr. Ratish Mallick

(Judges & Eminent Guests)

Media & Hospitality CoordinatorMr. Piyush Sharma

Faculty Coordinator Prof. (Dr.) Dharmender Patial

Prakhar Pandey

Coordinator thIX Semester Lloyd Law College

Abhinav Srivastava

Monika Bhagta

Ashutosh Pandey

Co- CoordinatorsthVII Semester

thVII Semester

thV Semester

Lloyd Law College

Lloyd Law College

Lloyd Law College

19

FROMMAYURVIHAR

NOIDAENTRY

ILC

IF

M

TY

DN

D F

LYO

VE

R

MA

HA

MA

YA

F

LYO

VE

R

FLY

OV

ER

BotanicalGarden

Metro Station

Sector-37Square

NOIDA- Gr.NOIDA EXPRESSWAY

ATSVILLAGESEC-93 EX

IT- 1

15 KM7 KM

GALGOTIA

Expo GA

E

RET

R

NOIDA

PARICHOWK

Mart

Alpha 2

TD

DR

O AI

YAMAHA

LG

MOSERBAER

FROMASHRAM,

DELHIFROM

KALINDIKUNJ,SARITA VIHAR

TAJEXPRESSWAY

TOWARDSAGRA

NOIDA

Location

LLOYD

Map, The Lloyd Campus..