Organizational Transformation 2.0

64
Organizational Transformation 2.0 Houston Community College

Transcript of Organizational Transformation 2.0

Page 1: Organizational Transformation 2.0

Organizational Transformation 2.0

Houston Community College

Page 2: Organizational Transformation 2.0

Transformation Mosaic

Page 3: Organizational Transformation 2.0

SITUATIONAL AWARENESSLeadership

3

Page 4: Organizational Transformation 2.0
Page 5: Organizational Transformation 2.0
Page 6: Organizational Transformation 2.0

How Twitter Users CanGenerate Better Ideas

Thriving in an IncreasinglyDigital Ecosystem

Is Your Business Ready fora Digital Future

MIT Sloan Management Review

Page 7: Organizational Transformation 2.0

Organizational Lifecycle

Survival

Good Management

Good to Great Leadership

Page 8: Organizational Transformation 2.0

PARADIGM SHIFTSChanging Environment

8

Page 9: Organizational Transformation 2.0
Page 10: Organizational Transformation 2.0
Page 11: Organizational Transformation 2.0
Page 12: Organizational Transformation 2.0
Page 13: Organizational Transformation 2.0
Page 14: Organizational Transformation 2.0
Page 15: Organizational Transformation 2.0
Page 16: Organizational Transformation 2.0

Music paradigms

16

QualityCapacityLower Cost

Page 17: Organizational Transformation 2.0

Digital Equipment Corporation

PARADIGM PARALYSIS

17

Page 18: Organizational Transformation 2.0

DEC as Technology Leader

You have probably never heard of it! BUT its remnants are in most of today’s technology

Source: http://web.archive.org/web/20021121125840/ http://www.falvey.org/hot_neg_ch3.shtml

• Firstinterac0vemini-computeropera0ngsystemVMS.• InventedLAN-Ethernetstd(DECnet).• Firstrela0onaldatabase(RDB,ISAM)• FirstemailsoMware(DECmail)• FirstDigitalLinearTape(DLT)drive• 16bit(1968),32bit(1976),64bit(1992)• Computerswith99%up0me• 19892ndonlytoIBMasWORLD’slargestcomputercompany

Page 19: Organizational Transformation 2.0

Demise of DEC

KenOlsen,president–“Thereisnoreasonforanyindividualtowantacomputerathome…Businesswantscomputerswith100%up0me.”(1977)

Page 20: Organizational Transformation 2.0

Source: IEEE Spectrum July 1992

Page 21: Organizational Transformation 2.0

Demise of DEC

itsoonbecameclearthatthenextgenera0on(processors)…BerkeleyRISCandStanforddesignswouldoutperformthefastestmembersoftheVAXfamily,DEC'scashcow.ConstrainedbythehugesuccessoftheirVAX/VMSproducts,theyfaltered

DEC->Compaq…HP

Page 22: Organizational Transformation 2.0

Cardelli OpSys Semantics - MSFT

Research

deCastro Unix - Data General, Alumni

Cutler VMS - MSFT - WNT - XP(64),

XBox

Gray RDB - MSFT Research

Lamport Print Drivers - MSFT

Gettys X-11 Interface - HP Research

Burrows Altavista - Google

DEC Creative Capital

Page 23: Organizational Transformation 2.0

DEC Force Field Diagram

USER FRIENDLY

LOW COST

ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE

DESKTOP AVAILABILITY CENTRAL PROCESSING

SPECIAL SKILLS

100% UPTIME

MORE TECHNOLOGY

DRIVING FORCES RESTRAINING FORCES

SMALLER APPS

NON-TECH APPLICATIONS

INTEGRATED APPS

ERODING CAUSE-EFFECT LOOP TALENT LOSS <=> INFLEXIBLE CORP. CULTURE

PURITANISM (ENGINEERING)

TALENT/IDEAS DEEP-ROOTED CULTURE

Page 24: Organizational Transformation 2.0

Organizational Lifecycle

Survival

Transform

Change (Good to Great)

Page 25: Organizational Transformation 2.0

The Birth of Silicone Valley

Shockley kept changing objectives and products. Shockley – control knowledge, transistors to big corp Noyce – share knowledge, transistors in every home.

William Shockley 1956 Nobel physics

Shockley Semiconductor

Victor Grinich Jay Last

C.S. Roberts Gene Kleiner Gordon Moore Julius Blank Jean Hoerni

Robert Noyce

Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied. Robert Noyce

Page 26: Organizational Transformation 2.0

Robert Noyce

It is not enough to simply say our objective is to grow and make profit – everyone is trying to do that …

I’d rather develop something that noone has done yet. Robert Noyce

Grinnell College Alumni Gary Cooper – Actor Herbie Hancock – Musician Robert Noyce – Founder Fairchild, Intel Walter Koeing – Actor (Chekov) Peter Coyote – Actor, screenwriter John Garang – President of South Sudan Thomas Cech – Nobel Prize Chemistry

Page 27: Organizational Transformation 2.0

Shockley

Fairchild

Intel

Team Lifecycle

Page 28: Organizational Transformation 2.0

Organizational Lifecycle

Survival

Transform

Change (Good to Great)

Page 29: Organizational Transformation 2.0

ORGANIZATIONAL RECONHCC Situational Awareness

29

Page 30: Organizational Transformation 2.0

30

Innovative 1%

Hierarchy 59%

Market 20%

Parochial 20%

Cultural Assessment

Page 31: Organizational Transformation 2.0

31

Management 52%

Procedures 19%

HR Practices 15%

Finances 5%

IT 4%

Other 6%

Performance Barriers

Page 32: Organizational Transformation 2.0

Organizational Diagnostic

32

Realignment Pockets of strength, feels successful

Start-up Much activity, focus on excellence

1. Low need for change 2. Low urgency (believes it is good) 3. High resistance (uncertainty)

1. High Change (newness driven) 2. High urgency (looking for wins) 3. High resistance (excellence)

Sustaining Success Strong team, is successful

Turnaround Isolated successes, stagnant

1. Low need for change (use existing model of success)

2. Low urgency (already good) 3. Low resistance (confident)

1. High change (needs driven) 2. High urgency (looking for wins) 3. Resistance Low (seeking direction)

URGENCY

RESISTANCE

HIGH

HIGH

LOW

LOW

Page 33: Organizational Transformation 2.0

Customer (Student) Service?

Page 34: Organizational Transformation 2.0
Page 35: Organizational Transformation 2.0

TRANSFORMATIONChange

35

Page 36: Organizational Transformation 2.0

Time (years)

Stakeholder Value

($)

Long-Term Growth inStakeholder Value

Good Citizen

Product Innovation

CustomerManagement

Operational Effectiveness

Short-wave Long-waveMid-wave

12-18 months 12-36 months 24-54 months

Customer Management

Processes

Operations Management

ProcessesInnovationProcesses

Regulatoryand SocialProcesses

1 2 3 4 5

Page 37: Organizational Transformation 2.0

Think …

Page 38: Organizational Transformation 2.0

Think … comments?

• Notbroken?-alwayssomethingtobedone(SamPalmisano,CEOIBMCorp.)

• Rowboatmentality(SirHowardStringer,CEOSonyCorp.)• Heartajacksvs.cancer(FareeedZakaria,journalist)• Informa0onempowersdistributeddecisionmaking

(Prof.ThomasMalone,MITSloanSchool)

• Techcan’tmakeourdecisionsforus(HMKAbdullahIIibnAlHussein)

Page 39: Organizational Transformation 2.0

Eight Steps to Transformation

1 Establish a Sense of Urgencyo Examine market and competitive realities o Identify potential crises, challenges

2 Form Guiding Coalitiono Commission influential group o Build a team environment

3 Create a Visiono Clarify a shared direction o Develop strategy to achieve vision

4 Communicate the Visiono Use multiple channels o Teach new behaviors for teaming

5 Empower Others to Acto Remove obstacles to change o Align org structures thru evolution

6 Plan for Short Term Winso Have visible improvements o Communicate the wins

7 Consolidate Improvementso Embed new culture in policies, practice o Expand change for further alignment

8 Institutionalize the HCC Wayo Link success to the HCC Way o Develop new leaders

Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail, John P. Kotter, 2007.

Page 40: Organizational Transformation 2.0

Transformation Timeline

G65RetreatOrganizationalIdentity(Nov7)

FacultySenateOrgIdentity(Nov14)

G65BuildingonStrategySession(Nov24)

Oct AprMarFebJanDecNovSept2014 2015

May Jun Jul

BoardRetreatVisionStatement(Dec6)

BoardRetreatTransformationPresentation(Dec11)

G65DefiningCentersofExcellence(Dec18)

G65PresidentPitchForCOE(Jan26)

G65OrgStructure(Mar5)

G65PresidentPro.BusinessCanvass(Jul1)

StateoftheCollegeCOEUnveil(Apr13)

AllCollegeDayCOEUnveil(Apr10)

Presidents/Deans/Directors/G65TransformationOrgStructure(Apr5)

G65MBTI(Jul30)

G65TeamBuilding/BusinessModel(31)

Chatw/ChancellorAllCampusesFeedbackSessions(Apr20-24)

StudentAdvisoryFeedbackSession(Apr24)

G31ChargetoG13OrgStructure(Mar5)

OrganizationalAssessments(Sept–Oct)

Page 41: Organizational Transformation 2.0

“Itisgenerallymucheasiertokillanorganizationthanchangeitsubstantially.”

KevinKelly,OutofControl,1994

Kevin Kelly, Out of Control

Note

Page 42: Organizational Transformation 2.0

MATRIXFlexibility

42

Page 43: Organizational Transformation 2.0

Matrix Forms

• Employeeeffortslimitedtofunc0onalgroups

• Parochialpriori0es,valuesandmission

FunctionalMatrix

BalancedMatrix

ProjectMatrix

• Parochialpriorities,valuesandmission

• Employeesmovebetweenfunctionalsandgroups

• Employeemembersofmultiplegroups

• Groupsstriveforbalancefocusingonuniversalmission

• Functionalleadersdefinestaffingandopsdetailswithinsystemguideline

Page 44: Organizational Transformation 2.0

Matrix Properties

• Leveragefunctionaleconomiesofscalewhileremainingtask-focused

• Focusemployeesonmultiplebusinessgoals

• Improvesdistrict-widefocus

• Informationflowincreasethroughlateralchannels

• Distributesdecision-making

WEAKNESSES

• Decouplesauthorityandresponsibility

• Decouplessinglestrandverticalchain

• Createsambiguity

• Likelyincreasesresistanceduetoperceivedlossofstatus,authority

Sy,Thomas.ChallengesandStrategiesofMatrixOrganizations:TopLevelandMid-LevelManager’sperspectives.HumanResourcePlanning,28.1(accessfromBoozAllen.com)

STRENGTH

Page 45: Organizational Transformation 2.0

Challenges to Managing in a Matrix

Top 5 Challenges Iden0fied

0

25

50

75

100

MisalignedGoals AmbiguousAuthority Silo-FocusedEmployees

Mid-LevelMgr Top-LevelMgr

MISALIGNED UNCLEAR AMBIGUOUS LACK OF SILO-FOCUSED GOALS ROLES AUTHORITY GUARDIAN EMPLOYEES

Page 46: Organizational Transformation 2.0

HOUSTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE Transformation 1.0

46

Page 47: Organizational Transformation 2.0

INPUT FROM STAKEHOLDERS HIGHLIGHTSResearchHighlights:

9Trustees

13ExecutiveTeamMembers

63WholeSystemPlanningParticipants

4,275Students

3,262Faculty/Staff

751CommunityMembers

Page 48: Organizational Transformation 2.0

DATA COLLECTION HIGHLIGHTS2. StudiesandResearchtoInformtheProcess

OrganizationalIdentityStudy

CommunityValueStudy

StudentResearch

UrgencyAssessment

TaskInventory

OrganizationalHealthStudy

Page 49: Organizational Transformation 2.0

TRANSFORMATIONBROAD ENGAGEMENT (ADMIN, FACULTY, STAFF, STUDENTS)

1. Research--AnalysisandApplication2. WorkgroupDevelopment(boardvision;interdisciplinary

team;leadership)3. WholeSystemPlanning4. VisioningWorkshop5. OrganizationalAlignment–Values&Competencies6. StrategyMapping7. VisionAgreementSession(board)8. TransformationPlantoAchieveVision

Page 50: Organizational Transformation 2.0

WHATDIDWELEARN?

Page 51: Organizational Transformation 2.0

1. Theneedtoleverageoursizeandresources.

2. Theneedforaclearvision.

3. Theneedtoeliminateinefficiencies.

4. Theneedtoalignprioritiesacrossthesystem.

5. Theneedtocreateopportunities.

RESEARCH FINDINGS

Page 52: Organizational Transformation 2.0

Identity

Page 53: Organizational Transformation 2.0

Purpose

Page 54: Organizational Transformation 2.0

Positivity

Page 55: Organizational Transformation 2.0

Vision

Page 56: Organizational Transformation 2.0

HCC Vision

HCCwillbealeaderinprovidinghighquality,innovativeeducationleadingtostudentsuccessandcompletionofworkforceandacademicprograms.

Wewillberesponsivetocommunityneedsanddriveeconomicdevelopment

inthecommunitiesweserve.

Page 57: Organizational Transformation 2.0

HCC’S BUSINESS MODEL

• Amoreefficientcollege.

• Amoreinterconnectedcollege.

• Amoreresponsivecollege.

• Amorealignedcollege.

• Amoreinnovativecollege.

• Amoresuccessfulstudentandgraduate.

TOMORROW

Page 58: Organizational Transformation 2.0

FOCUSWecannotaffordtoinvestinthehighestlevelsofallthesamethingsateachofourcolleges–itiscostlyandinefficient.

Wemustshiftourfocustooneofexcellenceandinnovation.

Thisrequiresustorethinkandshareinnewanddifferentways.

ORGANIZATIONAL SHIFT

Page 59: Organizational Transformation 2.0

EXCELLENCEWewillfocusourresources,talentsandattentiononhighdemandareasthatprovidethegreatestreturnforourstudents,community,industryaswellasthecollege.

ACHIEVING EXCELLENCE

Page 60: Organizational Transformation 2.0

CenteringExcellence&ConnectingCommunityConceptualView

Page 61: Organizational Transformation 2.0
Page 62: Organizational Transformation 2.0

CreationofSystem-wideAcademicInstituteofExcellence:• Efficientschedulingofcoursesections• Increasedcourseavailabilityinresponsetostudentdemand

• Morecollaborativeapproachtofacultydevelopment

• TimeforCollegeAdministrationtofocusonstudentexperienceandInstitutesofExcellence

ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE

Page 63: Organizational Transformation 2.0

CURRENT

• Diffusedfocusoninstructionaldelivery

• Operationalculture

• Broadapproachtomarketing&outreach

• Limitedalignmentwithindustrydemands

FUTURE

• Laser-focusedleadershipforinstitutesofexcellence

• Innovativeculture

• Strategicapproachtomarketingandoutreach

• Aligninstructionalprogramswithindustrydemands

ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN

Page 64: Organizational Transformation 2.0

Organizational Transformation 2.0

Houston Community College