Organizational Transformation 2.0
-
Upload
houston-community-college -
Category
Education
-
view
11.138 -
download
0
Transcript of Organizational Transformation 2.0
Organizational Transformation 2.0
Houston Community College
Transformation Mosaic
SITUATIONAL AWARENESSLeadership
3
How Twitter Users CanGenerate Better Ideas
Thriving in an IncreasinglyDigital Ecosystem
Is Your Business Ready fora Digital Future
MIT Sloan Management Review
Organizational Lifecycle
Survival
Good Management
Good to Great Leadership
PARADIGM SHIFTSChanging Environment
8
Music paradigms
16
QualityCapacityLower Cost
Digital Equipment Corporation
PARADIGM PARALYSIS
17
DEC as Technology Leader
You have probably never heard of it! BUT its remnants are in most of today’s technology
Source: http://web.archive.org/web/20021121125840/ http://www.falvey.org/hot_neg_ch3.shtml
• Firstinterac0vemini-computeropera0ngsystemVMS.• InventedLAN-Ethernetstd(DECnet).• Firstrela0onaldatabase(RDB,ISAM)• FirstemailsoMware(DECmail)• FirstDigitalLinearTape(DLT)drive• 16bit(1968),32bit(1976),64bit(1992)• Computerswith99%up0me• 19892ndonlytoIBMasWORLD’slargestcomputercompany
Demise of DEC
KenOlsen,president–“Thereisnoreasonforanyindividualtowantacomputerathome…Businesswantscomputerswith100%up0me.”(1977)
Source: IEEE Spectrum July 1992
Demise of DEC
itsoonbecameclearthatthenextgenera0on(processors)…BerkeleyRISCandStanforddesignswouldoutperformthefastestmembersoftheVAXfamily,DEC'scashcow.ConstrainedbythehugesuccessoftheirVAX/VMSproducts,theyfaltered
DEC->Compaq…HP
Cardelli OpSys Semantics - MSFT
Research
deCastro Unix - Data General, Alumni
Cutler VMS - MSFT - WNT - XP(64),
XBox
Gray RDB - MSFT Research
Lamport Print Drivers - MSFT
Gettys X-11 Interface - HP Research
Burrows Altavista - Google
DEC Creative Capital
DEC Force Field Diagram
USER FRIENDLY
LOW COST
ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE
DESKTOP AVAILABILITY CENTRAL PROCESSING
SPECIAL SKILLS
100% UPTIME
MORE TECHNOLOGY
DRIVING FORCES RESTRAINING FORCES
SMALLER APPS
NON-TECH APPLICATIONS
INTEGRATED APPS
ERODING CAUSE-EFFECT LOOP TALENT LOSS <=> INFLEXIBLE CORP. CULTURE
PURITANISM (ENGINEERING)
TALENT/IDEAS DEEP-ROOTED CULTURE
Organizational Lifecycle
Survival
Transform
Change (Good to Great)
The Birth of Silicone Valley
Shockley kept changing objectives and products. Shockley – control knowledge, transistors to big corp Noyce – share knowledge, transistors in every home.
William Shockley 1956 Nobel physics
Shockley Semiconductor
Victor Grinich Jay Last
C.S. Roberts Gene Kleiner Gordon Moore Julius Blank Jean Hoerni
Robert Noyce
Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied. Robert Noyce
Robert Noyce
It is not enough to simply say our objective is to grow and make profit – everyone is trying to do that …
I’d rather develop something that noone has done yet. Robert Noyce
Grinnell College Alumni Gary Cooper – Actor Herbie Hancock – Musician Robert Noyce – Founder Fairchild, Intel Walter Koeing – Actor (Chekov) Peter Coyote – Actor, screenwriter John Garang – President of South Sudan Thomas Cech – Nobel Prize Chemistry
Shockley
Fairchild
Intel
Team Lifecycle
Organizational Lifecycle
Survival
Transform
Change (Good to Great)
ORGANIZATIONAL RECONHCC Situational Awareness
29
30
Innovative 1%
Hierarchy 59%
Market 20%
Parochial 20%
Cultural Assessment
31
Management 52%
Procedures 19%
HR Practices 15%
Finances 5%
IT 4%
Other 6%
Performance Barriers
Organizational Diagnostic
32
Realignment Pockets of strength, feels successful
Start-up Much activity, focus on excellence
1. Low need for change 2. Low urgency (believes it is good) 3. High resistance (uncertainty)
1. High Change (newness driven) 2. High urgency (looking for wins) 3. High resistance (excellence)
Sustaining Success Strong team, is successful
Turnaround Isolated successes, stagnant
1. Low need for change (use existing model of success)
2. Low urgency (already good) 3. Low resistance (confident)
1. High change (needs driven) 2. High urgency (looking for wins) 3. Resistance Low (seeking direction)
URGENCY
RESISTANCE
HIGH
HIGH
LOW
LOW
Customer (Student) Service?
TRANSFORMATIONChange
35
Time (years)
Stakeholder Value
($)
Long-Term Growth inStakeholder Value
Good Citizen
Product Innovation
CustomerManagement
Operational Effectiveness
Short-wave Long-waveMid-wave
12-18 months 12-36 months 24-54 months
Customer Management
Processes
Operations Management
ProcessesInnovationProcesses
Regulatoryand SocialProcesses
1 2 3 4 5
Think …
Think … comments?
• Notbroken?-alwayssomethingtobedone(SamPalmisano,CEOIBMCorp.)
• Rowboatmentality(SirHowardStringer,CEOSonyCorp.)• Heartajacksvs.cancer(FareeedZakaria,journalist)• Informa0onempowersdistributeddecisionmaking
(Prof.ThomasMalone,MITSloanSchool)
• Techcan’tmakeourdecisionsforus(HMKAbdullahIIibnAlHussein)
Eight Steps to Transformation
1 Establish a Sense of Urgencyo Examine market and competitive realities o Identify potential crises, challenges
2 Form Guiding Coalitiono Commission influential group o Build a team environment
3 Create a Visiono Clarify a shared direction o Develop strategy to achieve vision
4 Communicate the Visiono Use multiple channels o Teach new behaviors for teaming
5 Empower Others to Acto Remove obstacles to change o Align org structures thru evolution
6 Plan for Short Term Winso Have visible improvements o Communicate the wins
7 Consolidate Improvementso Embed new culture in policies, practice o Expand change for further alignment
8 Institutionalize the HCC Wayo Link success to the HCC Way o Develop new leaders
Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail, John P. Kotter, 2007.
Transformation Timeline
G65RetreatOrganizationalIdentity(Nov7)
FacultySenateOrgIdentity(Nov14)
G65BuildingonStrategySession(Nov24)
Oct AprMarFebJanDecNovSept2014 2015
May Jun Jul
BoardRetreatVisionStatement(Dec6)
BoardRetreatTransformationPresentation(Dec11)
G65DefiningCentersofExcellence(Dec18)
G65PresidentPitchForCOE(Jan26)
G65OrgStructure(Mar5)
G65PresidentPro.BusinessCanvass(Jul1)
StateoftheCollegeCOEUnveil(Apr13)
AllCollegeDayCOEUnveil(Apr10)
Presidents/Deans/Directors/G65TransformationOrgStructure(Apr5)
G65MBTI(Jul30)
G65TeamBuilding/BusinessModel(31)
Chatw/ChancellorAllCampusesFeedbackSessions(Apr20-24)
StudentAdvisoryFeedbackSession(Apr24)
G31ChargetoG13OrgStructure(Mar5)
OrganizationalAssessments(Sept–Oct)
“Itisgenerallymucheasiertokillanorganizationthanchangeitsubstantially.”
KevinKelly,OutofControl,1994
Kevin Kelly, Out of Control
Note
MATRIXFlexibility
42
Matrix Forms
• Employeeeffortslimitedtofunc0onalgroups
• Parochialpriori0es,valuesandmission
FunctionalMatrix
BalancedMatrix
ProjectMatrix
• Parochialpriorities,valuesandmission
• Employeesmovebetweenfunctionalsandgroups
• Employeemembersofmultiplegroups
• Groupsstriveforbalancefocusingonuniversalmission
• Functionalleadersdefinestaffingandopsdetailswithinsystemguideline
Matrix Properties
• Leveragefunctionaleconomiesofscalewhileremainingtask-focused
• Focusemployeesonmultiplebusinessgoals
• Improvesdistrict-widefocus
• Informationflowincreasethroughlateralchannels
• Distributesdecision-making
WEAKNESSES
• Decouplesauthorityandresponsibility
• Decouplessinglestrandverticalchain
• Createsambiguity
• Likelyincreasesresistanceduetoperceivedlossofstatus,authority
Sy,Thomas.ChallengesandStrategiesofMatrixOrganizations:TopLevelandMid-LevelManager’sperspectives.HumanResourcePlanning,28.1(accessfromBoozAllen.com)
STRENGTH
Challenges to Managing in a Matrix
Top 5 Challenges Iden0fied
0
25
50
75
100
MisalignedGoals AmbiguousAuthority Silo-FocusedEmployees
Mid-LevelMgr Top-LevelMgr
MISALIGNED UNCLEAR AMBIGUOUS LACK OF SILO-FOCUSED GOALS ROLES AUTHORITY GUARDIAN EMPLOYEES
HOUSTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE Transformation 1.0
46
INPUT FROM STAKEHOLDERS HIGHLIGHTSResearchHighlights:
9Trustees
13ExecutiveTeamMembers
63WholeSystemPlanningParticipants
4,275Students
3,262Faculty/Staff
751CommunityMembers
DATA COLLECTION HIGHLIGHTS2. StudiesandResearchtoInformtheProcess
OrganizationalIdentityStudy
CommunityValueStudy
StudentResearch
UrgencyAssessment
TaskInventory
OrganizationalHealthStudy
TRANSFORMATIONBROAD ENGAGEMENT (ADMIN, FACULTY, STAFF, STUDENTS)
1. Research--AnalysisandApplication2. WorkgroupDevelopment(boardvision;interdisciplinary
team;leadership)3. WholeSystemPlanning4. VisioningWorkshop5. OrganizationalAlignment–Values&Competencies6. StrategyMapping7. VisionAgreementSession(board)8. TransformationPlantoAchieveVision
WHATDIDWELEARN?
1. Theneedtoleverageoursizeandresources.
2. Theneedforaclearvision.
3. Theneedtoeliminateinefficiencies.
4. Theneedtoalignprioritiesacrossthesystem.
5. Theneedtocreateopportunities.
RESEARCH FINDINGS
Identity
Purpose
Positivity
Vision
HCC Vision
HCCwillbealeaderinprovidinghighquality,innovativeeducationleadingtostudentsuccessandcompletionofworkforceandacademicprograms.
Wewillberesponsivetocommunityneedsanddriveeconomicdevelopment
inthecommunitiesweserve.
HCC’S BUSINESS MODEL
• Amoreefficientcollege.
• Amoreinterconnectedcollege.
• Amoreresponsivecollege.
• Amorealignedcollege.
• Amoreinnovativecollege.
• Amoresuccessfulstudentandgraduate.
TOMORROW
FOCUSWecannotaffordtoinvestinthehighestlevelsofallthesamethingsateachofourcolleges–itiscostlyandinefficient.
Wemustshiftourfocustooneofexcellenceandinnovation.
Thisrequiresustorethinkandshareinnewanddifferentways.
ORGANIZATIONAL SHIFT
EXCELLENCEWewillfocusourresources,talentsandattentiononhighdemandareasthatprovidethegreatestreturnforourstudents,community,industryaswellasthecollege.
ACHIEVING EXCELLENCE
CenteringExcellence&ConnectingCommunityConceptualView
CreationofSystem-wideAcademicInstituteofExcellence:• Efficientschedulingofcoursesections• Increasedcourseavailabilityinresponsetostudentdemand
• Morecollaborativeapproachtofacultydevelopment
• TimeforCollegeAdministrationtofocusonstudentexperienceandInstitutesofExcellence
ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE
CURRENT
• Diffusedfocusoninstructionaldelivery
• Operationalculture
• Broadapproachtomarketing&outreach
• Limitedalignmentwithindustrydemands
FUTURE
• Laser-focusedleadershipforinstitutesofexcellence
• Innovativeculture
• Strategicapproachtomarketingandoutreach
• Aligninstructionalprogramswithindustrydemands
ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN
Organizational Transformation 2.0
Houston Community College