Organic Rice Production and SRI - Mr. Boondit Varinruk
Transcript of Organic Rice Production and SRI - Mr. Boondit Varinruk
ORGANIC RICE PRODUCTION
Boondit Varinruk Agronomist
Rice Research and Development Division, Rice Department, MOAC, Thailand. E-mail: [email protected] June 2-3, 2015
SRI (System of Rice Intensification) &
Topics ORGANIC RICE PRODUCTION :
1. OR production framework
2. OR farming model development
3. Some OR research & development
4. Case: OR cultivation in Upper Northern Thailand
Comment to SRI : 1. SRI & Conventional techniques
2. Modification of SRI
3. Experiment in the farmer field
1992 : Chiengrai & Phayao : North
* private company, farmers, RD
‚ FRAGRANT RICE‛
1993 : Surin & Yasothon : Northeast
* NGO’s, farmer group
ORGANIC RICE PRODUCTION in THAILAND
*Chiengrai *Payao
*Surin *Yasothorn
“ CHIENGRAI/PHAYAO “ Facilitate by
‘Top Organic Products & Supplies’ (STC)
MARKETING : TOP, Riseria Monferrato
FARMING : 3 farmer groups RRDD
PROCESSING : CRI miller, CapRice
CERTIFY : BAC (Italy)
‚ORGANIC RICE : ThHML, GR‛
3. ORGANIC FARMING MODEL DEVELOPMENT
3 Layers: A: BASIC ASPECTS/GUIDELINE B: FARMERS PRACTICES C: RECOMMENDED TECHNOLOGY (R&D) 3 COMPONENTS :
A: Production site B: Cultivation model C: Product management
Certification system
BASIC ASPACTS OF ORGANIC AGRICULTURE
Emphasize; soil fertility, bio-diversity, balance of nature
Chemical-free, GMO’s free ‘safety food’
Health and environment concern
Certification and traceability
Green business.
1. Production site
Soil fertility, Topography, Water, Climate
Resources, Risk & Support factors
Boundary, Contamination, Treatment & Protection
“Production site management”
2. Cultivation model : (techniques & inputs)
Varieties & seed
Cultural practices
Soil fertility management
Crop protection
Post harvest management
“Cultivation management”
3. PRODUCTION/YIELD MANAGEMENT
• Harvesting date
• Estimated yield
• Tools & Material preparation
• Combined harvester dating
• Paddy rice drying plan
• Paddy bags tagging/coding
• Separation from other paddy rice??
Certification system
Site assessment
Cultivation techniques assessment, monitoring and sampling
Production stock & quality control
Report summary & verify
Certify or not…
OR Model arrangement
A : Conformed components adapted
B : Incompatible components:
replace by local materials/techniques
research and development C : Base on : the advantage of local
resource, traditional cultivar, suitable condition.
4. SELECTED RESEARCH ON ORGANIC RICE :
4.1 Varietal assessment :
Variety Group
ORGANIC CHEMICAL
t/ha % t/ha %
1. Photo-sens. 3.3 102 3.2 100
2. Non-photo-sens. 3.7 86 4.4 100
3. HYV 4.3 84 5.1 100
4. Japonica 2.1 73 2.9 100
a. 1999-2001 Varietal assessment
b. 2002 : Varietal assessment
CV(M)=13.3% CV(S) =8.0% F-test: M x S = 1.75ns
Variety (S) Cultivation (M) Mean-
variety Chemical Organic Untreated
1. KDML105 2.98 2.91 2.68 2.86cd
2. Red jasmine 2.84 2.67 2.05 2.52c
3. Hawm Pitsanulok 1 3.38 3.61 2.88 3.29 b
4. RD6 3.08 3.28 2.72 3.03 c
5. Suphan Buri 1 4.05 4.30 3.45 3.91 a
6. Pathumtani 1 3.18 2.69 2.48 2.79 d
7. Sakolnakorn 3.10 2.90 2.75 2.91cd
8. Sanpatong 1 4.14 3.94 3.54 3.88a
Mean – model 3.34 a 3.28 a 2.82 b -
c. 2003 : Varietal assessment
CV(M)=11.0% CV(S) =7.7% F-test: M x S = 2.11*
Variety (S) Cultivation (M) Mean-
variety Chemical Organic Untreated
1. KDML105 3.71a 3.83a 3.01b 3.52
2. Red jasmine 4.04a 4.11a 3.14b 3.76
3. Hawm Pitsanulok 1 3.96a 3.88a 3.33b 3.72
4. RD6 4.28a 4.09ab 3.68b 4.01
5. Suphan Buri 1 5.03a 4.58a 3.86b 4.49
6. Pathumtani 1 4.66a 3.98b 3.66b 4.10
7. Sakolnakorn 3.98a 3.36b 3.23b 3.52
8. Sanpatong 1 5.15a 4.24b 3.84b 4.41
Mean – model 4.35 4.01 3.47 -
d. RICE VARIETY FOR ORGANIC PRODUCTION
• Most of photo-sensitive tall varieties are suitable
• Some semi-dwarft is suitable (e.g.SPR1)
• Japonica rice is not suitable to organic cultivation (due to high N requirement)
4.2 Planting method improvement :
a. 1999-2001 : at CHR
Plt. methods Grain yield (t/ha)
1998 1999 2000 2001
1. Dibbling 1/ 4.0a 4.1a 2.8b 1.9b
2. Drilled in row 3.9a 4.0a 4.0a 2.1b
3. Broadcasting 4.2a 4.1a 3.6a 2.2b
4. Transplanting 4.0a 3.7a 3.3ab 3.6a
C.V.(%) 11.6 6.9 15.1 11.8
1/ changed to pre-germinated seed broadcasting
b. 2002-2003 average* on 3 locations :
Planting method
Location Mean
PAN PRE SPT
t/ha %ck t/ha %ck t/ha %ck t/ha %ck
1. pre-germinated seed broadcasting
2.51 79 2.88 67 3.61 98 3.00 81
2. Dry-seed broadcasting 2.88 91 2.83 66 3.17 86 2.96 80
3. Dry-seed drilled 2.80 88 3.54 83 3.06 83 3.13 84
4. Transplanting(CK) 3.18 100 4.28 100 3.69 100 3.72 100
Mean 2.84 - 3.38 - 3.38 - 3.20 -
*Average from 3rd to 6th year experiments out of 8 year
c: PLANTING METHOD for OR
• Transplanting is the most preferred
• Dry-seeded drilling and broadcasting can be used in some area
• Recommend to alternate planting method
4.3 Soil fertility management :
a. 1997-2000 at CRI :
* Rice plants were infected by bacterial leaf bright and neck blast.
Treatments Years
1997 1998 1999 * 2000
1. Green manure (mung bean) 2.63b 4.28a 3.22a 3.31b
2. Animal manure (cow dung) 2.90b 4.14a 3.21a 3.36ab
3. T1+T2 3.18b 4.18a 3.39a 3.83a
4. Chemical fertility (9-6-0) 3.63a 4.45a 3.43a 3.37ab
5. Control 2.82b 3.43b 3.21a 2.80b
Means 3.12 4.11 3.29 3.30
C.V. (%) 8.5 11.1 5.2 11.2
b. 1998-2001 average on 4 locations :
Treatments
Locations Means
PAN PSL UBN PTL T/ha %CK
1. Green manure 3.28 2.58 2.48 1.93 2.57 154 2. Compost - - 2.43 1.99 2.21 132 3. Animal manure 3.28 2.98 2.54 2.01 2.16 129 4. Chemical fertilizer
3.64 3.29 2.61 2.39 2.98 178
5. Control (CK) 2.96 2.22 2.00 1.17 1.67 100 Means 3.29 2.77 2.41 1.90 - -
c.Green manure 1999-2001 at CRI
Treatment RD15 KDML105
1999 2000 2001 1999 2000 2001
1. Control 2.56b 3.09b 2.68 abc 2.51b 3.19d 3.38bc
2. Cow pea 2.46b 3.11b 2.21c 2.55b 3.32cd 3.36bc
3. Mung bean 2.68b 3.24ab 2.38bc 2.54b 3.28cd 3.12c
4. Sunn hemp 2.63b 3.31ab 2.53 abc 2.50b 3.66bc 3.31bc
5. Seabania rostrata 3.11a 3.41a 2.78ab 3.06a 3.78ab 3.97a
6. CF (3+3) –4-4 3.46a 3.43a 2.99a 3.06a 4.14a 3.51ab
Mean 2.82 3.27 2.60 2.70 3.56 3.44
C.V.(%) 9.1 4.8 12.5 8.5 7.8 6.3
d. SOIL FERTILITY MANAGMANT FOR OR
• GM (mung bean) + FYM = CF
• KDML 105 average yield vary to location (N S)
• Stubble GM CP FYM
• Organic <10-20% return <Chemical
• GM : Sesbania, Sunn hemp = 18.8 kgN/ha = CF : suited to organic farming (erratic rainfall cond.)
5. ORGANIC RICE CULTIVATION IN NORTHERN THAILAND
• 800 ha rice field
• Soil: 1.0-2.5 % o.m. ; 3-38 ppm P, 25-91 ppm K
• Depend to rainfall
• 1,200-1,400 mm annual rainfall
• rice growing during May-Nov.
before rice : GM crops.
after rice : fallow, animal grazing
5.1 RICE VARIETIES & SEED PRODUCTION
• Fragrant rice :
KDML105, RD15
• seed produced by farmer group with technical recommendation and supported by CHR Rice Research Center
รูปภาพ
• รวงขา้ว • ขา้วเปลือก,กลอ้ง,ขา้วสาร
5.2 LAND PREPARATION & PLANTING METHODS
• Plowed twice : Mar-April รูปภาพ
• รถไถนา • ขา้วนาหวา่น
• แปลงกลา้, ขา้วนาด า
Dry ”seeded - 95kg/ha (mixed w/ mung bean broadcast fb. harrowing) Transplanted - 62 kg/ha - prepare seedling nursery in May & June - puddle soil and left submerged - transplant in June & August
5.3 SOIL FERTILITY MANAGEMENT
A Plow rice stubble & corporate in to the soil
B Grow green manure crops ; sunn hemp, Sesbania, mungbean
C Add rice straw compost (if necessary)
D Apply FYM : cow dung (if necessary)
•
5.4 WATER MANAGEMENT & WEED CONTROL
• 5-10 cm dept of water vigorous plants
• transplanting weed control
• hand/mechanical weeding
(if necessary)
• drain out 10-15 d before harvesting (depend on soil texture)
รูปภาพ
• ขา้วหลงัปักด า • คนถอนหญา้
5.5 PEST CONTROL
A Craps & golden apple snail : drain out ;collect for animal feed & bio-extract application
Toxic plants: oleader, tea waste
B Gall midge : DSR < TPR
C Blast : ORF < CRF
D Natural enamies were observed
5.6 POST HARVEST MANAGEMENT
• Harvested by sickle 2-3 d sun dry
collect & pile in the field 10-50 d.
threshing # manpower # machine
13-15 % M.C. paddy • combined-harvester 4-5 d sun dry
AVERAGE GRAIN YIELD : 3-4 T/ha
5.7 STORAGE & PROCESSING
CR/PY farmer * 2,800 t paddy
Miller (CRI) * 1,000 t w/b rice
CapRice(BKK) * graded/packed rice
Riseria M. * transport to Italy
Consumers * EU markets
รูปภาพ
• ขา้วเปลือก • ขา้วสาร • ขา้วบรรจุถุง • โรงสี
6. FARMERS’ ADOPTION OF TECHNOLOGY
High : “ seed production
“ cultural practices
“ soil & water management
“ weed control
“ post harvest management
Moderate : “ organic fertilizer
“ pest control
Low : “ cropping system
CONCLUSION ‚OR farming in Northern Thailand‛
• high potential rice land ; less risk factors
• favorable conditions w/o serious pest
• long time experienced farmers
• traditional cultivars, local materials
• R&D appropriate technology
• mostly well adpoted by farmers
‚PROTOTYPE FOR
ORGANIC RICE FARMING‛
6 Key elements of SRI
1. Seedlings get transplanted at a much younger age.
2. Only single seedlings, instead of a handful of seedlings get planted in each hill.
3. Plants are spaced wider apart, and in a square pattern.
4. Intermittent water application to create wet and dry soil conditions, instead of continuous flood irrigation.
5. Rotary weeding to control weeds and promote soil aeration.
6. Increased use of organic fertilizer to enhance soil fertility.
SRI concept “growing More with Less”
• Less seed use
• Less water use
• Less imported input
(Chem. Fertilizer & pesticide)
• More vigorous crop
• More grain yield
• More net return
• More labor use ??
Risk factors: 1. Crabs & Golden apple snails damage 2. Weed infestation
Comparison
SRI techniques;
low seed rate>>young seedling >> single plant x wide spacing >> Rice vs. Weed competition >> Require weed control measure = 1 seed/1 plant x space/more tillers/stronger
root & stalk/more panicles x ~150
grains>> 4-6 ton/ha
AWD >> soil aerate >> vigorous root/stem >> high rate of Nutrient uptake
Rotary weeding >> weed control + soil aerate
Organic fertilizer >> soil fertility
Conventional techniques; High seed rate >> High crop density >> Rice vs. Rice competition >> require extra input (Chem.fertilizer, Pesticide, Herbicide) =
1 seed/ 1 plant/ 1panicle x ~100 grains >> ~6 ton/ha
Irrigation continuous flood water,
Adapted to erratic rainfed condition.
Modification of SRI
Rice varietal diversification;
@ Tillering ability are differ between rice varieties and between group of varieties, UR > RFL > IRL > DWR
@ When we plant upland rice in submerged lowland rice, result as no tiller or less tillers.
@ Different rice group, response to different amount of Nitrogen; Japonica > Semi-dwarft indica > traditional tall indica > deep water rice,
@ This must be manage correctly, both for amount & timing.
Modification of SRI
Young seedling /Single plant ;
@ To reduce labor intensive: Seedling nursery for parachute transplanting with single seed in individual holes, transplanting in straight rows by hand or machine for the following rotary weeding.
@ A chance for other rice ecosystem with low labor use: In rainfed area where water is scarce, Dry seed dibbling can be applied using dibbling machine, control for number of seed/hill, and straight rows dibbling for the following rotary weeding.
Experiment in the farmer field
• Technology-generation experiment: to develop new technology w/ higher yield & lower cost in the farmers’ field; compare w/ control CK.
• Technology-verification experiment: To compare new package technology w/ farmer techniques in yield & profit; compare w/ farmer practices.
• Field selection, Expt. design, Comparison, Data collection, Data analysis & presentation.
(P 562-590 in: Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd Edition by Kwanchai A. Gomez and Artiro A. Gomez)