Organic Pedagogical Electronic Network Attachment of Molecular Catalysts on Solid Supports - Rh...
Transcript of Organic Pedagogical Electronic Network Attachment of Molecular Catalysts on Solid Supports - Rh...
Organic Pedagogical Electronic Network
Attachment of Molecular Catalysts on Solid Supports - Rh Complex on a Silica Support
Jones Group, Georgia Tech
Davies Group, Emory University
Introduction to Supported Molecular Catalysts
1) Chepiga, K. M.; Feng, Y.; Brunelli, N. A.; Jones, C. W.; Davies, H. M. L. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 6136. 2) Tokunaga, M.; Larrow, J. F.; Kakiuchi, F.; Jacobsen, E. N. Science 1997, 277, 936. 3) Zheng, X.; Jones, C. W.; Weck, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 1105.
• Increase catalyst turnover number (TON) by facilitating catalyst recovery and recycle1
• May allow enhanced utilization of expensive metals or ligands1
• Allows for design of experiments to probe key aspects of reaction mechanisms, e.g. prevention/limitation of key steps that are kinetically second order in catalyst concentration2,3
Porous oxides (e.g. silica, alumina)
Pros: tolerant to most organic solvents; high surface areas allow good solid-liquid contacting; broad temperature range;
Cons: hydroxyl groups on the surface mildly acidic and surface further covered with oxygen lone pairs (dative bonding to metal complex) - can interact with catalyst or reaction media;
Why Attach a Soluble, Molecular Catalyst to a Support?
Typical Support Characteristics
Polymers [e.g. poly(styrene) resins]
Pros: more tolerant to aqueous acidic or basic media compared to oxides; support backbone less likely to bond with metal complex than oxides;
Cons: resins swell differently in various solvents, affecting accessibility of catalyst sites; narrowing temperature range;
Catalyst Supporting Methodologies
1) Jones, C. W.; McKittrick, M. W.; Nguyen, J. V.; Yu, K. Top. Catal. 2005, 34, 67. 2) Tada, M.; Muratsugu, S.; Kinoshita, M.; Sasaki, T.; Iwasawa, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010. 132. 713. 3) Nakazawa, J.; Smith, B. J.; Stack, T.D.P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012. 134. 2750.
Immobilization Method
Covalent ligand binding
Physisorption Ion pair formation
Encapsulation
Applicability broad restricted restricted restricted
Drawbacks preparation competition with solventsor substrates
competition with polar or ionic substrates
substrate size, diffusion
General Immobilization Methods1
Selected Covalent Binding MethodsAlkene on Ligand and Surface2
Olefincoupling
Alkyne on Ligand and Azide on Surface3
Clickchemistry
support [Cat]AIBN
80 oC+ support [Cat]
support N3 +[Cat] [CuI]
ligandsupport N
N N
[Cat]
Covalent Attachment of Rhodium Catalyst
Chepiga, K. M.; Feng, Y.; Brunelli, N. A.; Jones, C. W.; Davies, H. M. L. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 6136.
Supported catalyst (right) depicts product from two AIBN-initiated radicals reacting with each alkene, followed by coupling. Other products also possible.
Attaching Rh2(S-DOSP)4 analogue on silica
Silica supportwith functionalized
surface
N
S
C12H25
O O
O
O
Rh
Rh
N
S OO
O
O
3
Alkene Functionalized Rh2(S-DOSP)4Derivative
N
S
C12H25
O O
O
O
Rh
Rh
N
S OO
O
O
3
C12H25
Rh2(S-DOSP)4
Single-Ligand Exchange
Functional group for catalystgrafting by alkene coupling
SiOOO O
OMeSi Si
silica
1 eqiv. AIBN, toluene, 80°C
SiOOO O
OMe
silica
SiSi
CN
[Rh2]
CN
SiOOO O
OMe
silica
SiSi
or
NC
[Rh2]
NC
1 eqiv. [Rh2] per Si-styryl group
Supported Rh catalyst
Asymmetric Cyclopropanation: Catalyst Recycling
Chepiga, K. M.; Feng, Y.; Brunelli, N. A.; Jones, C. W.; Davies, H. M. L. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 6136.
Ph
N2
PhPh Ph
CO2Me
CO2Me mesitylenehexanes,rt
+
1 mol%Rh(II)
cycle yield / % ee / %
1 72 80
2 78 81
3 75 79
4 76 77
5 78 79
Rh2(S-DOSP)4 88 88
Reaction, catalyst recovery via filtration, use in subsequent reaction; 5 cycles with consistent yield and enantiomeric excess (ee); Slightly reduced yield and ee compared to parent Rh2(S-DOSP)4 complex.
This reaction was catalyzed by the supported Rh catalyst, shown on the right of the previous slide.
Problems
1) What is the catalyst supporting methodology used in this work adding the Rh2(S-DOSP)4 analogue onto silica?
A. Covalent ligand binding;
B. Physisorption;
C. Ion pair formation;
D. Encapsulation.
2) What modification is needed for Rh2(S-DOSP)4 if click chemistry is used to bind the ligand onto solid supports? How might this be achieved?
N
S
C12H25
O O
O
O
Rh
Rh
N
S OO
O
O
3
C12H25
Rh2(S-DOSP)4