Orbits of Lagrangian Subalgebras of the Double sl(2, R)
-
Upload
nicola-ciccoli -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Orbits of Lagrangian Subalgebras of the Double sl(2, R)
Orbits of Lagrangian Subalgebras ofthe Double slð2;RÞ
NICOLA CICCOLI and LUCIO GUERRADipartimento di Matematica e Informatica, Universita¤ di Perugia, Via Vanvitelli 1,06123 Perugia, Italy. e-mail: [email protected] [email protected]
(Received: 13 March 2000)
Abstract. We describe the variety of Lagrangian subalgebras of the Drinfeld double for anarbitrary bialgebra structure on slð2;RÞ.We determine the irreducible components and the orbitstructure under the natural action of the group SLð2;RÞ.
Mathematics Subject Classi¢cations (2000). primary 17B62; secondary 53D17.
Key words. Lie bialgebras Drinfeld double, Lagrangian subalgebras.
1. Introduction
A Poisson^Lie group G has a tangent Lie bialgebra ðg; dÞ from which the Drinfelddouble DðgÞ is constructed, which is a Lie algebra on g� g� for which the naturalinner product is invariant. The variety La of Lagrangian subalgebras of the doubleadmits a natural action of G. The construction provides a classifying space forPoisson homogeneous spaces, according to the following theorem of Drinfeld (in[2]).
Given a homogeneous space M of the group G, there is a bijective correspondencebetween covariant Poisson structures on M and equivariant mappings M ! La
sending x 7!Lx so that Lx \ g is the Lie algebra of the stabilizer of x. A recent paper[3] contributes a universal Poisson structure on La such that every induced mappingM ! La is a Poisson mapping.
Note that the theorem contains, as special cases, both the classi¢cation of af¢nePoisson structures on a Lie group (for which we refer to [5]) and the classi¢cationof symplectic homogeneous varieties. Related results concerning the classi¢cationof covariant Poisson structures are found in [6,7].
In this paper, we determine the irreducible components and the orbit structure ofthe variety La for an arbitrary bialgebra structure on g ¼ slð2;RÞ. The componentof the point g is a real P3, and the pointed P3
f�g admits an equivariant ¢brationover P2, the projectivized g under the adjoint action of G ¼ SLð2;RÞ. A completedescription of orbits is in Section 4. The component of g� is a quadric surface ina second P3, irreducible but possibly singular, where one orbit is at in¢nity andthe af¢ne piece is a second orbit, except possibly for one ¢xed point. This is shown
Geometriae Dedicata 88: 135^146, 2001. 135# 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.
in Section 5. Finally, in Section 6, we determine the coisotropic orbits, those whichcarry a non-symplectic structure. The orbit decomposition is related to a naturalstrati¢cation according to the possible dimensions of intersections of Lagrangiansubspaces, which is presented in Section 3. A description of the irreduciblecomponents of La for a compact group G can be found in [3].
2. Preliminary Material
2.1. THE VARIETY OF LAGRANGIAN SUBALGEBRAS
Let T be a real vector space of even dimension 2n, endowed with a symmetric bilinearform h ; i of type ðn; nÞ. Up to isomorphism, we may identify T with V � V�, where Vis a vector space of dimension n, with the bilinear form hxþ x; yþ Zi ¼ xðyÞ þ ZðxÞ.We want to describe the variety L which parametrizes the Lagrangian subspacesof T .
The local coordinates in L are de¢ned in the following way. Let L;L0 be a pair of¢xed Lagrangian subspaces which are complementary in T . An open neighborhoodof L consists of all the Lagrangian subspaces which are complementary to L0. Iff : L! L0 is a linear map then the graph Lf ¼ fxþ f ðxÞ : x 2 Lg is complementaryto L0, and every complement to L0 is obtained in this way. Moreover the graphLf is Lagrangian if and only if f is h ; i-antisymmetric. Therefore in the open setof the Lagrangian complements to L0 the local coordinates are the points in the spaceof antisymmetric maps AðL;L0Þ. This gives to L the structure of a smooth realalgebraic variety of dimension nðn 1Þ=2. Moreover in this way L is an algebraicsubvariety of the Grassmannian GrnðT Þ.
We remark that L is naturally a homogeneous space of the group Oðn; nÞ, relativeto the stabilizer of a given Lagrangian subspace. As this stabilizer is a subgroupof SLð2nÞ it follows that L has two connected components. We will look at thecomponents in more detail in the special case of dimension n ¼ 3.
Now assume that T also carries the structure of a Lie algebra, for which the scalarproduct is invariant, i.e. the identity h½x; y�; zi ¼ hx; ½y; z�i holds. We want to describethe subvariety La of L which parametrizes the Lagrangian subspaces which aresubalgebras.
The local equations for La are obtained as follows. Let L be a ¢xed Lagrangiansubalgebra, and let L0 be a complementary Lagrangian subspace. In a neighborhoodof L the Lagrangian subspaces are of the form Lf with f 2 AðL;L0Þ. The condition forLf to be a subalgebra is that the identity
h½xþ fx; yþ fy�; zþ fzi ¼ 0
holds for every x; y; z 2 L.Equivalent is that the equality holds for every sequence x; y; z taken from a given
basis of L. In the special case of dimension n ¼ 3, because the scalar product is
136 NICOLA CICCOLI AND LUCIO GUERRA
invariant, it is enough to check the equation above for a single sequence x; y; z whichis a basis of L.
2.2. THE DRINFELD DOUBLE
On a Lie algebra g the structure of a bialgebra is given by a linear map d : g! gV
g,called cocommutator, such that d� is a Lie bracket on g�, and d is a 1-cocycle of gwithvalues in g� g with respect to the adjoint action.
If ðg; dÞ is a Lie bialgebra there exists a unique Lie algebra structure on g� g� suchthat g and g� are subalgebras (on g� the bracket d�) and for which the inner producthxþ x; yþ Zi ¼ xðyÞ þ ZðxÞ is invariant. The Lie bracket is:
½xþ x; yþ Z� ¼ ½x; y� ad�x ðZÞ þ ad�Z ðxÞ ad�x ðyÞ þ ad�y ðxÞ þ ½x; Z�
½x; Z� ½x; y�
where ad� denotes the dual adjoint action. The space DðgÞ ¼ g� g� endowed with theLie bracket above is called the Drinfel’d double of the bialgebra ðg; dÞ.
On a Poisson^Lie group G, identifying the tangent algebra gwith the space of rightinvariant vector ¢elds, a global 2-form Z : G! g ^ g is obtained from the Poissonbivector ¢eld. Its differential d : g! g ^ g is a cocycle, so there is a tangent bialgebraðg; dÞ.
If dðxÞ ¼ ½x; u� ^ u0 þ u ^ ½x; u0� is the coboundary of o0 ¼ u ^ u0 thenZðgÞ ¼ g u ^ g u0 u ^ u0 ¼ go0 o0. Here we write g u ¼ AdgðuÞ for the adjointaction of the group, and similarly go for the adjoint action on bivectors.
When g ¼ slð2;RÞ then every cocycle is a coboundary (vanishing cohomology) andevery coboundary is a cocommutator (vanishing Yang-Baxter equation). Explicitformulas are given in [1]. A classi¢cation of these bialgebra structures is foundin [4].
The action of G on the double DðgÞ is given by
gðxþ xÞ ¼ g xþ g1xþ g1xb ZðgÞ
where g1x ¼ Ad�g1 ðxÞ denotes the coadjoint action of g, and where the symbol bdenotes contraction of tensors.
2.3. THE ADJOINT ACTION OF SLð2;RÞ
We recall here some basic facts concerning the adjoint action of G ¼ SLð2;RÞ.Denote by H;X ;Y the usual basis in g ¼ slð2;RÞ. Apart from the null orbit, thenon-zero orbits of G in g are the ¢bres of det : g f0g ! R. The orbits of G inPrðgÞ, the projective space of g, are the three subsets
Dþ ¼ fdet > 0g D ¼ fdet < 0g D0 ¼ fdet ¼ 0g
represented by the vectors X Y ; H; X .
ORBITS OF LAGRANGIAN SUBALGEBRAS 137
The stabilizer of a point ½x� 2 PrðgÞ is the subgroup S½x� ¼ fg 2 G :
g x ¼ l x for some l ¼ lxðgÞg. Then lx : S½x� ! R� is a group homomorphism.Two elements which are equivalent under G have equivalent homomorphisms, whichhave the same image. The three basic stabilizers are
S½H� ¼k 0
0 k1
� �; k 6¼ 0
� �¼ R�
S½X Y � ¼ SOð2Þ;
S½X � ¼u v
0 u1
� �u 6¼ 0
� �¼ R� �R;
so for the elements X Y and H one ¢nds lðgÞ ¼ 1 identically, while for X one hasthe homomorphism lðgÞ ¼ u2. Summing up, we have the following
Remark. A point in Dþ [ D determines the trivial homomorphism lðgÞ ¼ 1, apoint in D0 determines an homomorphism such that imðlÞ ¼ R>0.
The adjoint action Ad ^ Ad of G on g ^ g is isomorphic to the adjoint action Ad.More precisely the Lie bracket v ^ w 7!½v;w� induces an isomorphism g ^ g$ g
which determines an isomorphism of actions Ad ^ Ad $ Ad. The non-zero orbitsare the ¢bres of the map D : g ^ g f0g ! R de¢ned by
Dðv ^ wÞ ¼ det ½v;w�
which is expressed asða2 þ 4bcÞ in terms of the coordinates ða; b; cÞ of v ^ w relativeto the basis X ^ Y ; Y ^H; H ^ X . The orbits are represented by the bivectorsa X ^ Y ; b H ^ ðX Y Þ; H ^ X .
The coadjoint action CoAd of G on g� is isomorphic to the action on bivectors. Thedeterminant map induces an isomorphism g ^ g$ g� which gives an isomorphismAd ^ Ad $ CoAd. Here one uses the fact that Ad passes through the special groupSLðgÞ. We will not make use of this.
3. Lagrangian Subspaces of Dimension 3
According to the possible values for the pair of dimensions
d ¼ dim L \ g d 0 ¼ dim L \ g�
the variety L is partitioned into strata
Lðd; d 0Þ
We also de¢ne larger strata
Lðd;Þ Lð; d 0Þ
where the blank means union over all dimensions. In the special case dim g ¼ 3 wewant to relate the strati¢cation to the components of L.
138 NICOLA CICCOLI AND LUCIO GUERRA
LEMMA 3.1. The strata Lð0; 0Þ; Lð2; 0Þ; Lð0; 2Þ are empty.Proof. In the open set d 0 ¼ 0 a Lagrangian subspace is of the form Lf corres-
ponding to some antisymmetric f : g! g�. Since Lf \ g ¼ ker f and since the rankof an antisymmetric f is even it follows that the dimension d is odd. Similarlyd ¼ 0 implies d 0 odd. &
LEMMA 3.2. The stratum Lð1; 1Þ is also empty.Proof. If L � gþ g� is a Lagrangian subspace, call M;M0 the images of the
projections of L into g; g�. If both dimensions d; d 0 are X 1 then there is a basisfor L of the form x; x0; yþ y0, where x 2 L \ g; x0 2 L \ g�. Then M is generatedby x; y and M0 is generated by x0; y0. It is easy to see that L is Lagrangian ifand only if the linear forms x0; y0 are zero on the vectors x; y, that is to sayM0 � AnnðMÞ. Therefore, if d 0 ¼ 1, then M has dimension 2 and thereforeM0 ¼ AnnðMÞ has dimension 1 which implies d ¼ 2. &
LEMMA 3.3. If L is a Lagrangian subspace of type ð1; 2Þ then L ¼M þM0 is a directsum of subspaces M � g and M0 � g� which are orthogonal in the duality. Moreover,M ¼ kerðf Þ and M0 ¼ imðf Þ for an antisymmetric map f : g! g� which is determinedup to proportionality. Similarly a Lagrangian subspace of type ð2; 1Þ is a direct sumL ¼M þM0 of orthogonal subspaces where M ¼ imðf Þ and M0 ¼ kerðf Þ for anantisymmetric map f : g� ! g.
Proof. Continuing the argument in the preceding proof, in the case d 0 ¼ 1. As y0 isa multiple of x0 then a basis for L is given by x; y; x0, hence L ¼M þM0. We havealready seen that M0 ¼ AnnðMÞ. De¢ne L ¼ g�=M0 so that L� ¼M. Anantisymmetric map f : g� ! g such that M ¼ imðf Þ and M0 ¼ kerðf Þ is inducedby an antisymmetric map L! L�. The space of these maps has dimension 1. &
We are now in a position to state the relation of the strati¢cation and thecomponents of the variety L, sketched in the following diagram:
ð1; 0Þ ð0; 1Þ. & . &
ð3; 0Þ ð1; 2Þ ð2; 1Þ ð0; 3Þg g�
G G0
where an arrow from a stratum to another says that the second is in the boundary ofthe former. The two pieces G;G0 are the components of L.
We have the identi¢cation Lð; 0Þ $ Aðg; g�Þ on the af¢ne piece, given by localcoordinates, and the bijection Lð1; 2Þ $ PrðAðg; g�ÞÞ on the boundary, given byLemma 3.3. Thus G is bijective to the projective space PrðV Þ whereV ¼ Aðg; g�Þ �R. Note that this projective space has a natural partition into strata,
ORBITS OF LAGRANGIAN SUBALGEBRAS 139
a distinguished point in the af¢ne part and the space at in¢nity, and that the bijectionabove preserves the strati¢cations.
Similarly one sees that the variety G0, union of the af¢ne open set Lð0;Þ and theclosed stratum Lð2; 1Þ, is bijective to the projective space PrðV 0Þ whereV 0 ¼ Aðg�; gÞ �R, in a bijection which preserves the strati¢cations.
LEMMA 3.4. The natural bijection
PrðV Þ [ PrðV 0Þ ! G [ G0 ¼ L
is an isomorphism which preserves the strati¢cations.Proof. A direct veri¢cation by means of local coordinates is a long computation.
We just sketch a second proof. It is enough to prove that the map is a morphismin the direction PrðV Þ [ PrðV 0Þ ! L. The theorem then follows from a general fact,that a birational bicontinuous map onto a normal variety is an isomorphism. Itis enough to consider the restriction PrðV Þ ! L. Using the embeddingL,!Gr3ðgþ g�Þ one is reduced to prove that PrðV Þ ! Gr3ðgþ g�Þ is a morphism.Locally over small open subsets of PrðAðg; g�ÞÞ there are morphisms ½f �7!x½f �such that x½f � generates kerðf Þ. Over smaller open subset we may also assumethat two given vectors y; z are independent of every x½f �. Now consider thelocal morphism which sends ðf ; kÞ 2 V into the class of the 3-vectorx½f � ^ ðkyþ f ðyÞÞ ^ ðkzþ f ðzÞÞ. It is easy to check that for k ¼ 0 this gives the pointassociated to the Lagrangian kerðf Þ þ imðf Þ, and for k ¼ 1 this gives the pointassociated to Lf . &
4. In the Double slð2;RRÞ, Orbits in the Component C
We are going to describe the orbit structure of the variety of Lagrangian subalgebrasin the double DðgÞ for an arbitrary bialgebra structure on g ¼ slð2;RÞ. The startingpoint is the following:
LEMMA 4.1. The map L 7!L \ g is equivariant.Proof. The statement means that gL \ g ¼ gðL \ gÞ. An element of gL is
gxþ g1x0 þ g1x0bZðgÞ where xþ x0 2 L. It belongs to g if and only ifg1x0 ¼ 0 and hence if and only if x0 ¼ 0. So the element of gL is indeed gx wherex 2 L \ g. &
We ¢rst consider the piece contained in the component G. The subalgebra g is a¢xed point. So consider the stratum Lð1;Þ. Because of the lemma, the mapL 7!L \ g de¢nes an equivariant ¢bration p : Lð1;Þ!PrðgÞ which reduces theorbit structure of the total space to the orbit structure of ¢bres under the actionsof stabilizers. This is indeed the route that we are going to follow.
140 NICOLA CICCOLI AND LUCIO GUERRA
The ¢bre Lðh;Þ is identi¢ed to the space of antisymmetric maps f : h? ! g=h. Tothe map f is associated the Lagrangian L ¼ f xþ x0 : x0 2 h?; x ¼ f ðx0Þmod hg. If abasis x; y; z is given such that x is a generator of h, and if x0; y0; z0 is the dual basis,then there is a scalar k such that f ðy0Þ ¼ kz; f ðz0Þ ¼ ky modulo h. The correspond-ing Lagrangian L is generated by the vectors x; kzþ y0; kyþ z0.
THEOREM 4.2. All these Lagrangians are subalgebras. So the variety G is acomponent of La.
Proof. Let a Lagrangian subspace be given by means of a basis as before. Thecondition for a subalgebra is h½x; kzþ y0�;kyþ z0i ¼ 0, as follows from the lastparagraph in Section 2.1. After some computations one ¢nds that
h½x; kzþ y0�;kyþ z0i ¼ k h½x; y�; y0i þ k h½x; z�; z0i þ hx; ½y0; z0�i;
where
h½x; y�; y0i þ h½x; z�; z0i ¼ tr adx ¼ 0
because tr adx ¼ 0 for an element in a semisimple algebra, and moreover
hx; ½y0; z0�i ¼ 0
because h? is a subalgebra of g�, like all subspaces of dimension 2. In fact if thecoproduct d is the coboundary of the bivector o0 ¼ u ^ u0 then
hx; ½y0; z0�i ¼ hdðxÞ; y0 ^ z0i ¼ h½x; u� ^ u0 þ u ^ ½x; u0�; y0 ^ z0i
¼ hx ^ ½u; u0�; y0 ^ z0i ¼ hx; y0i h½u; u0�; z0i hx; z0i h½u; u0�; y0i ¼ 0
where the equality ½x; u� ^ u0 þ u ^ ½x; u0� ¼ x ^ ½u; u0� follows under the isomorphisma ^ b 7!½a; b� from the Jacobi identity. &
Every antisymmetric map f : h? ! g=h is obtained as contraction f ðx0Þ ¼ x0b �oowith a bivector �oo ¼ �uu ^ �vv in g=h ^ g=h. If L is the Lagrangian over h correspondingto �oo then the Lagrangian gL over h0 ¼ gh in the same way corresponds to a bivector�oo0 in g=h0 ^ g=h0. The action of g on Lagrangians is expressed as a mapg=h ^ g=h!g=h0 ^ g=h0.
LEMMA 4.3. The action of g is the quotient action of o 7!gðoþ o0Þ o0 where o0
is the bivector that gives the coproduct.Proof. Let L ¼ f xþ x0 : x0 2 h?; �xx ¼ x0b �oog. An element of gL is of the form
gxþ g1x0 þ g1x0b ZðgÞ ¼ yþ y0 where y ¼ gxþ g1x0b ZðgÞ and y0 ¼ g1x0.One needs to show that �yy ¼ y0b �oo0 where o0 ¼ gðoþ o0Þ o0. In fact moduloh0 one has gx ¼ gðx0b oÞ ¼ ðg1x0b goÞ ¼ y0b, go. Remind moreover thatZðgÞ ¼ go0 o0. It follows that y ¼ y0b ðgoþ ZðgÞÞ ¼ y0b o0 modulo h0. &
LEMMA 4.4. Action of the stabilizer SðhÞ on the ¢bre Lðh;Þ.
ORBITS OF LAGRANGIAN SUBALGEBRAS 141
(1) If h 2 Dþ [ D then every g 2 SðhÞ stabilizes every L 2 Lðh;Þ.(2) If h 2 D0 then in the ¢bre there is a unique Lagrangian L0 which is a ¢xed point of
SðhÞ. The two components of the complement Lðh;Þ fL0g are two orbits.
Proof. Let g 2 SðhÞ. Then go ¼ ð1=lðgÞÞ �oo for any bivector �oo, where lðgÞ is theeigenvalue of h for g, introduced in Section 2.3. This is because the inducedendomorphism �gg of g=h ^ g=h satis¢es �gg �oo ¼ det �gg �oo and moreover1 ¼ det g ¼ lðgÞ det �gg as the adjoint action factors through SLðgÞ. Therefore theaction of g on the ¢bre is induced by the action o 7! ð1=lðgÞÞ ðoþ o0Þ o0. Point 1.In this case one has lðgÞ ¼ 1 for every g (see the remark in Section 2.3). Point 2. Oneneeds to solve the equation �oo0 þ �oo0 ¼ ð1=lÞ ð �ooþ �oo0Þwith l ¼ lðgÞ. Given �oo; �oo0 thereis a solution l > 0 if and only if �oo; �oo0 belong to the same hal£ine with origin �oo0 inthe line g=h ^ g=h, and then there is g such that lðgÞ ¼ l (same remark quoted above).The equation is satis¢ed for every g if and only if �oo0 ¼ �oo ¼ �oo0. &
THEOREM 4.5. Over the two orbits Dþ;D the ¢bration p admits equivarianttrivializations. Thus over each orbit there is a family of orbits parametrized bythe real line R. Over the orbit D0 there are three orbits.
Proof. Point 1. Because of the preceding lemma, there is an induced map
G=SðhÞ � Lðh;Þ !p1ðG hÞ
It is easily seen to be an isomorphism of varieties. Point 2. There is a bijection
orbits of SðhÞ in Lðh;Þ ! orbits over G h
which to an orbit SðhÞ � L with L 2 Lðh;Þ associates the orbit G � L, and converselyto an orbit V over G h associates the intersection V \ Lðh;Þ. The result then followsagain from the preceding lemma. &
The orbit structure of La implies the classi¢cation of Poisson homogeneous spacesof the group, according to Drinfeld’s theorem in the introduction. For instance onthe upper half plane X an homogeneous Poisson structure is given by an equivariantmorphism X ! La that covers the natural isomorphism X ! Dþ. The theoremabove then implies that the homogeneous Poisson structures on X form a familyparametrized by the real line R. Explicit formulas are given in [4].
5. Orbits in the Component C0
Here we describe the orbit structure of the second piece La \ G0. The variety ofLagrangian subalgebras La inherits from L a decomposition into strata
Laðd; d 0Þ
Consider the piece of type ð2; 1Þ. The map Lð2; 1Þ !Prðg ^ gÞ is an equivariantisomorphism.
142 NICOLA CICCOLI AND LUCIO GUERRA
LEMMA 5.1. A Lagrangian subspace L ¼M þM0 of type ð2; 1Þ is a subalgebra ifand only if M is a subalgebra.
Proof. If L is a subalgebra and if x; y 2M then ½x; y� 2 L and by de¢nition½x; y� 2 g whence ½x; y� 2M. Conversely if M is a subalgebra it is enough to provethat ½x; x0� 2 L for elements x 2M and x0 2M0. Now ½x; x0� ¼ ad�x ðx
0Þ þ ad�x0 ðxÞand one has to prove that ad�x0 ðxÞ 2M and ad�x ðx
0Þ 2M0. For y 2M one hashy; ad�x ðx
0Þi ¼ h½x; y�; x0i ¼ 0 because ½x; y� 2M and x0 2M0. For y0 2M0 one hashad�x0 ðxÞ; y0i ¼ hx; ½x0; y0�i ¼ 0 because ½x0; y0� ¼ 0. &
It is therefore induced an equivariant isomorphism
Lað2; 1Þ!S
onto the subvariety which parametrizes the subalgebras of dimension 2 in g.
PROPOSITION 5.2. The stratum Lað2; 1Þ is an orbit.Proof. Observe that in the list of orbits of the adjoint action on bivectors the only
one that contains subalgebras is the orbit of H ^ X . Therefore S is an orbit. &
Finally consider the action on Lð0;Þ, which is isomorphic to the space ofantisymmetric maps Aðg�; gÞ. Every antisymmetric map f : g� ! g is obtained ascontraction f ðx0Þ ¼ x0bo with a bivector o 2 g ^ g. Therefore the action of Gon Lagrangians is isomorphic to an action on g ^ g.
LEMMA 5.3. If the coproduct d is the coboundary of the bivector o0 then the actionof the element g is given by
o 7! gðoþ o0Þ o0
It follows that the orbits of the action are translates of the orbits of the adjoint action.Proof. To the bivector o corresponds the Lagrangian L ¼ fxþ x0 : x ¼ x0bog.
The Lagrangian gL is the set of vectors of type gðxþ x0Þ ¼ gxþ g1x0 þ g1x0bZðgÞ ¼ yþ y0 where y ¼ gxþ g1x0b ZðgÞ and where y0 ¼ g1x0. One needs to showthat if x ¼ x0b o then y ¼ y0bo0 where o0 ¼ gðoþ o0Þ o0. Sincegx ¼ gðx0b oÞ ¼ g1x0b go it follows that gðxþ x0Þ ¼ y0b ðgoþ ZðgÞÞ ¼ y0bo0. &
THEOREM 5.4. In the coordinates o the variety Lað0;Þ is de¢ned by the equation
Dðoþ o0Þ ¼ Dðo0Þ
where Dðv ^ wÞ ¼ det ½v;w�. If Dðo0Þ 6¼ 0 it is an orbit. If Dðo0Þ ¼ 0 the varietycontains a ¢xed point, corresponding to the bivector o0, and the complement isa second orbit.
ORBITS OF LAGRANGIAN SUBALGEBRAS 143
Proof. Using the one-to-one correspondence between two-dimensional subspacesand bivectors up to scalars, in which the subspace generated by v;w correspondsto the bivector v ^ w. We may write o ¼ x ^ y and o0 ¼ y ^ z, where y belongsto the intersection of the two planes that correspond to the bivectors. Assume thatx; y; z are independent and call x0; y0; z0 the dual basis. The Lagrangian is generatedby the vectors z0; yþ x0;xþ y0. The condition for a subalgebra is written in theform
hx; ½x0; z0�i þ hy; ½y0; z0�i þ h½x; y�; z0i ¼ 0
which is symmetric to the equation found in the proof of Theorem 4.2 and is obtainedin the same way, applying Section 2.1. Computing coproducts we obtainh½x; y�; x0i þ h½y; z�; z0i þ h½x; y�; z0i ¼ 0 whence h½x z; y�; z0i þ h½x; y�; x0i ¼ 0 and
h½x z; y�; z0 þ x0i ¼ h½y; z�; x0i
De¢ne u ¼ x z and consider the basis u; y; z and the dual basis u0; y0; z0. Theequation is written as
h½u; y�; z0i ¼ h½y; z�; u0i
Since u ^ y ^ ½u; y� ¼ h½u; y�; z0i u ^ y ^ z we deduce the equivalent equation
u ^ y ^ ½u; y� ¼ y ^ z ^ ½y; z�
Using the formula
u ^ y ^ ½u; y� ¼ det ½u; y� H ^ X ^ Y
we deduce the ¢nal equation
det ½u; y� ¼ det ½y; z�
Then consider the case x; y; z dependent. If x ^ y ¼ 0 we have the subalgebra g� andthe equation above is satis¢ed. If x ^ y 6¼ 0 we may write y ^ z ¼ a x ^ y and thenwe may assume z ¼ a x. Introduce a basis x; y;w and the dual basis x0; y0;w0.Computing as before the condition for a subalgebra is written asð2aþ 1Þ h½x; y�;w0i ¼ 0 while the equation above becomes ð2aþ 1Þ det½x; y� ¼ 0.We know from Section 2.3 that they are equivalent. &
COROLLARY 5.5. The component of La contained in G0 is a projective quadric.Proof. Use the description of G0 as a projective space given in Section 3. The
stratum Lað0;Þ is the af¢ne quadric surface de¢ned by the equation in the theoremabove. The conic at in¢nity is therefore det½u; v� ¼ 0 and this is the equation ofLað2; 1Þ, according to Section 2.3. &
Remark that the quadric is irreducible. It is singular if and only if Dðo0Þ ¼ 0 and inthis case it has the unique singular point o0. Note that the condition for
144 NICOLA CICCOLI AND LUCIO GUERRA
nonsingularity of the quadric coincides with the condition for the correspondingbialgebra structure to be quasi^triangular (see [1]).
6. Coisotropic Orbits
Let L 2 Lð1;Þ. Recall that such a Lagrangian subspace is in fact a subalgebra. Weconsider the question whether there is some g 2 G such that gL 2 Lð1; 2Þ. If a Poissonhomogeneous space X is given by some map onto the orbit of L then the conditionabove is satis¢ed if and only if the Poisson structure on X is not symplectic (cf.[5]). We call these orbits coisotropic because X is then the quotient of the Poisson^Liegroup by a coisotropic subgroup.
The variety of coisotropic subalgebras is G � Lð1; 2Þ. It is invariant under G and thenatural map to PrðgÞ restricts to an equivariant ¢bration over the image. The dis-tribution of coisotropic orbits follows from the structure of these ¢bres.
There is a natural section PrðgÞ ! Lð1;Þ de¢ned from the bivector o0 whichgives the coproduct. For every h choose in Lðh;Þ the subalgebra correspondingto the bivector �oo0 2 g=h ^ g=h. The section is equivariant and the image L0 there-fore consists of three orbits, one over each orbit in PrðgÞ.
LEMMA 6.1. Let L 2 Lðh;Þ correspond to �oo 2 g=h ^ g=h. The orbit of L iscoisotropic if and only if �ooþ �oo0 2 jðGo0Þ where j : g ^ g!g=h ^ g=h is the naturalprojection.
Proof. The image gL in the ¢bre over g h corresponds to �oo0 whereo0 ¼ gðoþ o0Þ o0. It is of type ð1; 2Þ if and only if �oo0 ¼ 0 modulo g h and thisis if and only if oþ o0 g1o0 ¼ 0 modulo h. &
PROPOSITION 6.2. If o0 ¼ 0 the stratum Lð1; 2Þ is invariant, and is the union ofthree coisotropic orbits. Assume then o0 6¼ 0.
(1) Over Dþ the coisotropic orbits are as follows. If Dðo0Þ < 0 every orbit; if Dðo0Þ ¼ 0every orbit except for the orbit in L0; if Dðo0Þ > 0 the variety of coisotropic orbitsis ¢bred over Dþ and the ¢bre is the complement of an open interval in the real line.
(2) Over D every orbit is coisotropic.(3) Over D0 the coisotropic orbits are as follows. If Dðo0ÞW 0 every orbit; if Dðo0Þ > 0
every orbit except for the orbit in L0.Proof. For o0 ¼ 0 the proof is immediate. Consider the case o0 6¼ 0. We want to
determine the coisotropic subalgebras over a ¢xed h, using Lmma 6.1, and we onlyneed to consider one point h for each orbit in PrðgÞ. The orbit Go0 is the quadricsurface which in coordinates is given by the equation ða2 þ 4bcÞ ¼ u whereu ¼ Dðo0Þ, minus the origin if u ¼ 0 (Section 2.3). The ¢bres of the linear projectionj are the translates of the plane h ^ g.
Choose h ¼ hX Y i as a point in the orbit Dþ. The translates of h ^ g are theplanes b c ¼ v. Then v is a coordinate in the quotient line
ORBITS OF LAGRANGIAN SUBALGEBRAS 145
R ¼ g=h ^ g=h ¼ g ^ g = h ^ g. The quadric a2 þ 4bc ¼ u intersects the planeb c ¼ v at some point different from the origin if and only if v belongs to the imagejðGo0Þ. So by elementary calculations we ¢nd that jðGo0Þ is:R if u < 0,R f0g ifu ¼ 0, the subset v2 uX 0 if u > 0. Point 1 in the statement follows easily.
Choose h ¼ hHi in the orbit D. The ¢bres of j are the planes a ¼ v and withsimilar calculations one ¢nds that jðGo0Þ ¼ R for every u. Finally considerh ¼ hXi in the orbit D0. The ¢bres of j are the planes b ¼ v and jðGo0Þ isfound to be: R if uW 0, and R f0g if u > 0. This proves points 2,3 in thestatement. &
References
1. Aminou, R. and Kosmann-Schwarzbach, Y.: Bige¤ bres de Lie, doubles et carre¤ s, Ann. Inst.H. Poincare¤ Phys. Te¤ or. 49 (1988), 461^478.
2. Drinfeld V. G.: On Poisson homogeneous spaces of Poisson^Lie groups, Theoret. Math.Phys. 95 (1993), 524^525.
3. Evens, S. and Lu, J.-H.: On the variety of Lagrangian subalgebras, Preprintmath.DG/9909005.
4. Leitenberger, F.: Quantum Lobachevskij planes, J. Math. Phys. 7 (1996), 3131^3140.5. Lu, J.-H.: Multiplicative and af¢ne Poisson structures on Lie groups, PhD thesis,
University of California, Berkeley, 1990.6. Lu, J.-H. and Weinstein, A.: Poisson-Lie groups, dressing transformations and Bruhat
decomposition, J. Differential Geom. 31 (1990), 501^526.7. Sheu, A. J. L.: Quantization of the Poisson SUð2Þ and of its Poisson homogeneous space ^
the 2-sphere, Comm. Math. Phys. 135 (1995), 217^232.
146 NICOLA CICCOLI AND LUCIO GUERRA